Structural basis for full-spectrum inhibition of translational functions on a tRNA synthetase

Abstract

The polyketide natural product borrelidin displays antibacterial, antifungal, antimalarial, anticancer, insecticidal and herbicidal activities through the selective inhibition of threonyl-tRNA synthetase (ThrRS). How borrelidin simultaneously attenuates bacterial growth and suppresses a variety of infections in plants and animals is not known. Here we show, using X-ray crystal structures and functional analyses, that a single molecule of borrelidin simultaneously occupies four distinct subsites within the catalytic domain of bacterial and human ThrRSs. These include the three substrate-binding sites for amino acid, ATP and tRNA associated with aminoacylation, and a fourth ‘orthogonal’ subsite created as a consequence of binding. Thus, borrelidin competes with all three aminoacylation substrates, providing a potent and redundant mechanism to inhibit ThrRS during protein synthesis. These results highlight a surprising natural design to achieve the quadrivalent inhibition of translation through a highly conserved family of enzymes.

Introduction

Borrelidin (BN) was originally isolated from culture broths of the marine antagonistic actinomycete strain Streptomyces rochei or Streptomyces parvulus, and exhibits multiple biological functions on a wide range of organisms1,2,3. BN activities include antibacterial, antifungal, antimalarial, insecticidal and herbicidal, and recently anti-vascular endothelial growth factor-induced angiogenesis activities4,5,6,7,8. BN protects mice from lethal malaria infection9. The antimalarial activities of BN against drug-sensitive FCR3 strain and drug-resistant K1 strain of P. falciparum (IC50: 1.8–1.9 nM) are even more effective than the most potent antimalarials currently used in clinics, including artemether, artesunate and chloroquine10. BN inhibits in vivo blood vessel formation and angiogenesis of the rat aortic tube with an IC50 of 0.8 nM (ref. 11). BN also inhibited spontaneous lung metastasis of B16-BL6 melanoma at the same dose that inhibited angiogenesis12. These diverse activities stand in marked contrast to the apparent unitary nature of its target, the essential translation enzyme threonyl-tRNA synthetase (ThrRS or TARS)13,14,15,16.

ThrRS is one of the 20 (in general) aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (AARSs) that are essential enzymes responsible for charging corresponding amino acids to their cognate tRNAs and providing the correct substrates for high-fidelity protein synthesis17,18. A two-step aminoacylation reaction involving the binding of amino acid and activation of ATP, followed by a transfer of the aminoacyl-group from the high-energy intermediate aminoacyl-adenylate (AA-AMP) to the 3′-OH of tRNA, is essential for establishing the genetic-code linkage, and is a fundamental process in all cellular life18. As the first characterized AARS inhibitor, BN was initially linked to AARS through its antibiotic action in microorganisms, which involves selective inhibition of threonine incorporation in tRNA4.

The inhibition of BN was soon confirmed in a variety of ThrRSs from bacteria to human cells4,5,19. BN suppresses threonyl-tRNA formation in Escherichia coli4, yeast5 and human acute lymphoblastic leukaemia cells19. The subsequent rise in the levels of uncharged tRNA in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia cells further leads to the induction of the general control nonderepressible-2 kinase stress responsive pathway, and eventual cellular apoptosis19. Other reports have demonstrated that an expression level increase or sequence alteration of ThrRS is associated with BN resistance in E. coli, yeast and Chinese hamster ovary cells (CHO cells)14,15,16. BN-resistant E. coli K12 strains can be selected with a frequency of 1 × 10−8, and include strains with an increased level of wild-type ThrRS, and strains that harbour a mutated thrS gene14. BN-resistant CHO cells also displayed threefold increased level of ThrRS activity16. In fact, BN inhibits the threonine activation step of bacterial ThrRS with a Ki value of about 4 nM (ref. 20), and a Ki of about 7 nM for human ThrRS (Supplementary Fig. 1a), placing it among the most potent AARS inhibitors described (Table 1). How BN acts on ThrRS to potently control its function across a variety of species remains unclear.

Table 1 List of characterized AARS inhibitors.

Here we present a detailed structural and functional analysis of the binding of BN to ThrRS. We determined the crystal structures of both human and E. coli ThrRS in complex with BN, and identified a unique structural inhibition mechanism of BN against ThrRS. BN occupies a significant fraction of the total volume of the ThrRS enzymatic pocket, physically excluding all three of the physiological substrates of ThrRS, namely L-threonine (L-Thr), ATP and tRNA. Inhibition of translation by BN can be rescued by the addition of each substrate, indicating that BN acts as a triple-competitive inhibitor. Although occupying the canonical active site cavity, BN also extends into a fourth ‘orthogonal’ pocket. This fourth pocket is not evident in the substrate-bound ThrRS structures, underscoring the induced-fit nature of BN’s interaction with ThrRS. Occupancy of the fourth subsite further intervenes the aminoacylation activity of ThrRS, producing a redundant mechanism for inhibition of protein translation. These results highlight the surprising design of a natural polyketide to achieve quadrivalent binding and inhibition of a tRNA synthetase in two of the three kingdoms of life.

Results

Structural basis of specific ThrRS–BN recognition

To elucidate the species-independent, full-spectrum inhibitory mechanism of BN, we co-crystallized a fragment of human ThrRS containing the essential catalytic domain and anticodon-binding domain (residues 322–723, Supplementary Fig. 1b) with BN and determined the structure to a resolution of 2.6 Å (Table 2). As a typical class II AARS21, human ThrRS forms a dimer through the catalytic domain, with each subunit binding one molecule of BN (Supplementary Fig. 2). The polyketide BN binds tightly in the aminoacylation active site cavity of human ThrRS (Fig. 1a,b), constituted by class II AARS signature motif 2 (residue 432–469), motif 3 (585–613)22 and surrounding hydrophobic loops 386–393, 411–413, 538–540 and 564–567 (Fig. 1c,d). The plane of the 18-membered ring in BN fits perpendicularly to the seven-stranded β-sheet of the catalytic domain (Fig. 1d).

Table 2 Crystallographic statistics of ThrRS–BN complex structures.
Figure 1: Structural basis of specific ThrRS–Borrelidin (BN) recognition.
figure1

(a) Chemical structure of BN. (b) BN is deeply buried in an induced-fit pocket of human threonyl-tRNA synthetase (ThrRS). The compound is shown as orange sticks; the surface view of one human ThrRS monomer is shown in grey. (c) Two-dimensional presentation of BN binding in human ThrRS. BN and hydrogen-bonding residues are shown in stick representations, and other residues within 4.5 Å of BN are shown in grey. (d) Zoom-in view of BN localization in the conserved catalytic core of ThrRS. The classical motifs 2 and 3 in class II aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (AARSs) are coloured in orange and green, respectively. BN and interacting residues are shown as sticks.

We also crystallized an E. coli ThrRS fragment containing the catalytic and anticodon-binding domains with BN (Supplementary Fig. 3a). The structures of human ThrRS and E. coli ThrRS exhibit high similarity, with an r.m.s.d. (root mean square distance) of 0.664 Å for 279 Cα atoms superimposed over the catalytic domains (Supplementary Fig. 3b). Consistent with the 48% sequence identity between human and E. coli ThrRS’s in the catalytic domain, BN is bound in the active site cavity with a nearly identical structure in human and E. coli ThrRS–BN complex structures. The binding modes of BN in both the human and E. coli ThrRSs are therefore closely similar. The r.m.s.d. of all 35 non-hydrogen atoms of the bound BNs from the two structures is only 0.314 Å. By virtue of its location deep within the catalytic pocket, BN interacts with the enzyme in all directions (Fig. 1c and Supplementary Fig. 4). Thirty-three of its thirty-five non-hydrogen atoms (except C4 and C8) form six hydrogen bonds and a total of 155 interactions with the protein within 4.5 Å (Fig. 1d). Eighteen residues from the ThrRS active site contribute to these interactions, fifteen of which are strictly conserved in bacterial, fungal, plasmodium and other eukaryotic ThrRSs (Supplementary Figs 5 and 6). Therefore, the inhibition mechanism of ThrRS by BN appears to be conserved from bacteria to human.

In contrast, archaeal ThrRSs are resistant to BN20. Out of the 18 key BN-interacting residues in bacteria and eukaryotes, 12 are altered in archaeal ThrRS, and may account for its kingdom specificity (Supplementary Figs 5,7 and 8). These residues include S386, G387, H388, H391, Y392, M411, Q460, F539, Y540, Q566, L567 and A592 (numbering by human ThrRS). For instance, Q460 on the floor of motif 2 in human ThrRS forms a key hydrogen bond with the only carboxylic group of BN. The corresponding residue is a methionine in archaeal ThrRS, representing a critical hydrogen bond with BN would be lost (Supplementary Figs 5 and 8). Similarly, A592 in motif 3 in human ThrRS forms a hydrophobic interaction with the C20 methylene groups of BN that would not be possible in the archaeal enzymes, owing to a substitution by hydrophilic serine (Supplementary Figs 5 and 8). Among other hydrophobic interactions, van der Waals contacts between Q566, L567, S386, G387 and H388 on the back wall of the cavity with the 8′ methyl and 12′ cyano groups of BN (Fig. 1c and Supplementary Fig. 4) would be prevented with archaeal ThrRS, because of non-conserved substitutions of these residues (Supplementary Figs 4 and 7a).

The incompatibility of BN with archaeal ThrRSs may be associated with the early separation of archaeal ThrRS from bacterial and eukaryotic ThrRS in evolution23. Similarly, archaeal ThrRSs also contain a unique D-amino-acid deacylase-like editing domain that is orthogonal to the typical bacterial/eukaryotic-editing domain24. In support of the discriminative role of these residues, mutations at H309 and L489 in E. coli ThrRS (corresponding to H388 and L567 in human) confer 300- to 1,000-fold increases in Ki, representing significant resistance to BN20 (Supplementary Fig. 7c,d). In summary, the preponderance of amino-acid substitutions at key BN-interacting residues in archaeal ThrRS provides a highly redundant basis for the essentially kingdom-wide resistance to BN (Supplementary Fig. 8).

BN simultaneously occludes the 3 substrate-binding sites

The two-step reaction of aminoacylation involves the binding of amino acid and activation of ATP, followed by a transfer of the activated amino acid to the 3′-OH of appropriate tRNA25. However, the polyketide structure of BN does not resemble any of the substrates of ThrRS. To understand the mechanism of inhibition of BN on ThrRS aminoacylation activity, we compared the ThrRS–BN structure with ThrRS structures in which one or more substrates are bound. With respect to L-Thr, BN’s location in the enzymatic centre of each ThrRS subunit (Fig. 2) creates a steric clash between the BN cyclopentanecarboxylic group (C18–23) and the amino-acid carboxyl group (Fig. 2b). Ten of eighteen BN-interacting residues are involved in the interactions with L-Thr during normal aminoacylation (Supplementary Figs 5 and 9), including two residues H590 and C413 that chelate the conserved zinc atom26 (Fig. 2b). In ThrRS complexes with bound L-Thr, these latter residues collaborate with H464 (which does not interact with BN) to chelate the essential zinc atom that recognizes the β-OH group of L-Thr27. BN also triggers side chain rearrangements that disrupts the L-Thr-binding site, stabilizing rotamer conformations of T560, Y540 and Q562 that would be incompatible with L-Thr binding (Supplementary Fig. 9). Co-crystallization of the ThrRS–BN complex in the presence of excess L-Thr (5 mM), ATP analogue AMPCPP (5 mM), and Mg2+ (10 mM) revealed density only for BN (2 mM) but not for L-Thr or AMPCPP. This suggests that L-Thr and BN cannot bind to ThrRS simultaneously (Supplementary Fig. 3c,d).

Figure 2: BN excludes all substrates of ThrRS for protein translation.
figure2

(a) Section view of BN (orange) occupying the catalytic site cavity of ThrRS. (b) Close-up view of L-Thr pocket of superimposed E. coli ThrRS–L-Thr structure (blue, PDB: 1EVK) with ThrRS–BN structure (cyan). Numbering of residues is according to human ThrRS and the corresponding E. coli ThrRS residues are shown in parenthesis. (c) Close-up view of ATP pocket of superimposed Staphylococcus aureus ThrRS–ATP structure (magenta, PDB: 1NYR) with ThrRS–BN structure (cyan). (d) Close-up view of tRNA pocket of superimposed E. coli ThrRS–tRNAThr structure (yellow, PDB: 1QF6) with ThrRS–BN structure (cyan). (e) Close-up view of extra hydrophobic pocket occupied by BN (orange), which is beyond the substrate-binding pockets.

Further structural inspection reveals that BN also simultaneously occludes binding of ATP and tRNA. The C22–23 atoms of the cyclopentanecarboxylic group of BN overlap with the superimposed α-phosphate group of ATP (Fig. 2c). Notably, the carboxyl acid group on BN precludes a key interaction in aminoacylation by forming a bifurcated salt-bridge with R442 (Fig. 2c). As a characteristic residue conserved in all class II AARSs, R442 activates AA-AMP formation by stabilizing the pentacoordinate transition state of the α-phosphate28,29. By interacting with the guanidine group of R442, BN prevents R442 binding to L-Thr and ATP, thereby blocking the formation of the threonyl-adenylate (Thr-AMP; Fig. 2c). C4–5 of BN further pushes Y392 into the tRNAThr A76 adenosine-binding pocket, whereas in the tRNA-bound structure of the E. coli ThrRS, the corresponding Y313 stacks with the adenine ring of A76 for aminoacylation27 (Fig. 2d). In addition, the C1–3 portion of BN also creates a steric clash with the A76 ribose of tRNAThr (Fig. 2d), thereby preventing the productive binding of tRNA. All together, these structural observations indicate that BN occupies the central ThrRS active site cavity that joins the three substrate-binding pockets for L-Thr, ATP and tRNA, and effectively excludes substrate binding to ThrRS (Fig. 2).

BN competes with all 3 substrates of ThrRS for translation

To further explore the mechanism of BN inhibition on protein translation, we used a rabbit reticulocyte lysate-based in vitro translation system (Fig. 3a). This system contains all the machinery necessary to translate proteins but lacks endogenous DNA or mRNA, effectively minimizing background translation in the absence of exogenous transcript30. BN inhibited the translation of luciferase mRNA in a dose-dependent manner (IC50=79.86±3.51 nM, Fig. 3b). The inhibition was rescued by addition of exogenous human full-length ThrRS or C-ThrRS (322–723) alone (Fig. 3c). In contrast, an N-ThrRS construct (1–322) lacking the catalytic domain failed to rescue the translation at any tested concentration, consistent with the absence of BN-binding determinants in this region of the protein (Fig. 3c). Together, these results indicate that BN can inhibit protein translation through the direct binding and inhibition of ThrRS.

Figure 3: BN competes with all three substrates of ThrRS for protein translation.
figure3

(a) Rabbit reticulocyte lysate (RRL) was incubated with luciferase mRNA and translation of luciferase enzyme was quantified in a luminescence assay. BN was used to inhibit the translation, whereas human ThrRS protein or ThrRS substrates were used to rescue the inhibition by BN. (b) Serial diluted BN (0.08 nM–100 μM) was added to inhibit the translation of luciferase mRNA. (c) Human ThrRS full-length (WT) and fragments (N: 1–322; C: 322–723) were added to rescue the protein translation inhibited by 250 nM BN. (d) Serial diluted L-Thr (1 μM–3 mM) was added to rescue the protein translation inhibited by 250 nM BN. (e) Similarly, individual amino acids were added to the final concentration of 1 mM in the reaction to rescue the inhibited translation by 250 nM BN. (f,g) ATP and tRNA rescued the inhibition of translation by BN in a diluted in vitro translation system (see Methods). (f) 10–250 nM ATP was tested with or without 10 nM BN. (g) E. coli expressed human tRNAThr (78–1250, nM) was assayed with or without 10 nM BN. Luciferase activity was normalized to the corresponding reactions without 10 nM BN. All error bars represent standard deviations (s.d.) of experimental triplicates.

To further explore the competitive nature of BN inhibition on ThrRS, we tested the ability of L-Thr to compete out the inhibitory effect of BN (Fig. 3d). Translation was recovered in BN-inhibited reactions (250 nM) by the addition of 1 mM L-Thr, consistent with the three orders of magnitude weaker binding affinity of L-Thr relative to BN. Moreover, only L-Thr was able to rescue translation among all 20 amino acids (Fig. 3e). To examine the effect of ATP and tRNAThr, we prepared a diluted system where the reaction sensitivity was increased because of the reduced concentration of the endogenous ThrRS. Again, ATP and tRNAThr showed a concentration-dependent rescue in the diluted in vitro translation system (Fig. 3f,g). In an earlier study, increase of L-Thr concentration was observed to suppress BN-induced apoptosis in endothelial cells31, whereas limiting L-Thr promoted BN sensitivity in cultured CHO cells16. Together, these results indicate that the cellular effects of BN are the result of the direct inhibition of ThrRS. By occupying the core site of catalytic cavity, BN competes with all three substrates of ThrRS for translation (Supplementary Movie 1).

BN occupies the fourth site by its macrolide ring structure

Interestingly, previous studies investigating the BN mechanism of inhibition concluded that it was a noncompetitive inhibitor for L-Thr, with slow tight binding kinetics20,32. However, it is appreciated that slow, tight binding active site-directed inhibitors can form weak encounter complexes that are readily competed by reaction substrates, before isomerizing to a high-affinity non-productive state that may be distinct from that favoured by substrates such as L-Thr and ATP33. This behaviour will generate a noncompetitive kinetic pattern for an inhibitor that behaves competitively in functional assays34.

We investigated whether BN induces such a state by comparing the E. coli ThrRS–BN structures with those of canonical ligands: L-Thr26, ATP35 and AMP together with tRNA27. By comparison with all three standard aminoacylation substrates, L-Thr, ATP, and AMP+tRNAThr (Fig. 4b–d), BN is inserted 4 Å deeper into the active site cleft (Fig. 4a). The additional interactions associated with the deeper binding lead to a significant conformational opening at the upper side of active site, thus highlighting an induced-fit component to the binding mechanism of BN (Supplementary Fig. 10). This upper active site opening also distinguishes the ThrRS–BN complex from the comparatively modest conformational change observed when ThrRS is bound to its aminoacylation substrates (Supplementary Fig. 10a). Prior fluorescence observations suggested that a strong conformational change of ThrRS occurs upon binding to BN20,36. In our structures, a major feature of the BN-induced conformational change is a 14° rotation of the α helix comprised by residues 431–448 that produce a 10-Å displacement of the preceding loop (Supplementary Fig. 10b). This structural change is observed in both the human and E. coli ThrRS–BN complexes (Supplementary Fig. 3b).

Figure 4: Critical regulation of ThrRS conformation and activity through the extra binding site of BN.
figure4

(ad) Binding cavity of ThrRS–BN complex in comparison with those of ThrRSs in complex with L-Thr (PDB: 1EVK), ATP (PDB: 1NYR) and AMP+tRNAThr (PDB: 1QF6). The approximate L-Thr pocket boundary is shown as a red line with bound ligands as sticks. BN binds 4 Å deeper and induces a cavity ~8 Å below the bottom of L-Thr pocket. (e) Extra hydrophobic pocket occupied by BN (orange). Interacting residues are shown as sticks. (f) In addition to human ThrRS full-length (WT) and fragments (N: 1–322; C: 322–723), four indicated mutants were tested to rescue the RRL-based in vitro protein translation inhibited by 250 nM BN. D462L misses one hydrogen bond with the hydroxyl group of L-Thr; F458A misses the stacking interaction with the adenine group of ATP; Y392E causes repulsion to the tRNA backbone phosphate group and L567R fills the space of the fourth subsites. (gj) Schematic diagrams of the conformational change in ThrRS. The BN-induced upper active site opening (UASO) is denoted, whereas BN is shown as orange lines. Bulky space-filling mutation (L567R) and shorter mutation (L567V) are shown as black lines. (k) Yeast ThrRS (yTHS1) was replaced by human wide-type ThrRS or mutants in supporting yeast growth. Empty vector and human lysyl-tRNA synthetase (LysRS) are used as control. The expression of endogenous yeast ThrRS was switched off by the addition of doxycycline (Dox) to the yeast growth medium. Tenfold serial dilutions of freshly gown yeast cells were spotted onto selective media synthetic complete medium without histodine (SCM-HIS) containing 2% galactose with or without Dox. (l) Schematic map showing BN occupied four sites on ThrRS: L-Thr site, ATP site, tRNA site and an extra site. Each site inhibits the translational activity of ThrRS.

In addition to the segments of the polyketide ring (C15-C3) that overlap with the canonical substrate-binding sites, additional portions of the BN polyketide ring project into the back of the active site cavity, effectively creating a fourth BN-binding subsite (Fig. 2b–e and Fig. 4e). This fourth BN-binding site consists of six highly conserved residues in bacterial and eukaryotic ThrRSs that constitute the back of the L-Thr pocket and have minimal exposure to solvent. This extra site provides interactions with the C4–C14 moeity of the polyketide ring, which represents a majority of carbons in the 18-membered macrolide ring (Fig. 4e). Notably, the 12′ cyano moiety, which strongly contributes to BN potency37, forms van der Waals contacts with the residues C413, L567, H388. The nearby 10′-OH group is hydrogen-bound to D564, representing the only hydrophilic interaction in this binding site. The rest of the macrolide is enveloped by hydrophobic contacts with the floor of the fourth subsite, principally contributed by S386, G387, H388, H391 and Y392. Interestingly, when ThrRS is not bound by BN, residues of this extra site are packed inside ThrRS forming a hydrophobic cluster (Fig. 4b–d). These residues are less conserved than those of the three substrate-binding sites (Supplementary Fig. 5). With the exception of C413 and D564, which are used for L-Thr recognition, all others are highly variable in archaeal ThrRS, and may contribute to the resistance of archaeal ThrRS to BN (Supplementary Figs 5 and 8). In summary, this fourth BN-binding subsite is distinguished from the aminoacylation substrate subsites by its induced-fit character, which arises from the unique manner in which the macrolide structure is inserted into the distal portion of the ThrRS active site cavity.

The extra binding site redundantly regulates ThrRS activity

These observations raised the question of whether the extra BN-binding subsite regulates the activity of ThrRS to the degree seen with the canonical substrate sites. To investigate this hypothesis, various binding site mutants were tested for their ability to rescue translation in rabbit reticulocyte lysates incubated with inhibitory concentrations of BN. Several mutants (D462L, F458A and Y392E) that perturb key contacts with aminoacylation substrates were employed as positive controls, along with a construct consisting of the first 322 amino acids of ThrRS (1–322). All four controls were dramatically reduced in their ability to rescue BN-dependent inhibition of translation, indicating the significant loss of aminoacylation activities (Fig. 4f). Notably, the D462L mutant failed to rescue the translation at any tested concentration, indicating that it lost both the aminoacylation and BN-binding abilities (Fig. 4f). L567 is located at the bottom of the fourth subsite, and its side chain forms direct contacts to C11-C12 of BN (Fig. 4e). As observed with D462L, L567R failed to rescue translation at all concentrations (Fig. 4f).

To further confirm the importance of the extra binding site for translation in cell, we used an in vivo yeast complementary survival assay. To probe the consequences of filling the extra BN-binding site, L567 was substituted with the bulkier tryptophan and arginine side chains, generating the mutants L567W and L567R (Fig. 4g–i). Both mutants completely lost the rescuing activity (Fig. 4k). The effect of leaving the fourth site less occupied was tested by examining the phenotype of L567V ThrRS, which removes one methyl group from this key side chain (Fig. 4j). Earlier work investigating the properties of L567V showed that its Ki for the BN-related derivative BC194 is increased eightfold relative to wild type8. Indeed, L567V fully rescued the yeast strain (Fig. 4k). Thus, although the L567V substitution affects a key interaction with BN, it leaves aminoacylation and protein synthesis unaffected. Therefore, these results revealed that the filling of the induced extra space by BN redundantly blocks the aminoacylation activity of ThrRS, making the BN a novel potent, quadrivalent inhibitor for translation (Fig. 4l).

Discussion

Collectively, these results represent a step towards implementation of small molecule based specific regulation of the AARSs. After 48 years of investigation of its inhibition of cellular function4, BN is now shown to be distinguished from other small molecules that inhibit the canonical function of AARSs, and that mimic the structures of substrates of AARSs.

Because of their important functions, inhibitors of AARSs have been used as medicine or rigorously tested in clinical trials for therapeutic applications in microbial infections, cancers and autoimmune diseases38,39,40,41,42,43. For example, the natural product mupirocin inhibits isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase activity and is approved as a topical treatment for bacterial skin infections. Febrifugine is the active component of the Chinese herb Chang Shan (Dichroa febrifuga Lour.), which has been used for treating malaria-induced fever for about 2,000 years. Halofuginone (HF), the halogenated derivative of febrifugine, has been tested in clinical trials for potential therapeutic applications in cancer and fibrotic disease44. Recently, HF was reported to inhibit Th17 cell differentiation by activating the amino-acid response pathway, via inhibition of the aminoacylation function of human prolyl-tRNA synthetase38,45. The recently developed inhibitor AN2690 binds to fungal leucyl-tRNA synthetase and is licensed for the treatment of onychomycosis46. These examples highlight the tremendous potential of AARS inhibitors in medical applications, and illustrate how knowledge of the inhibition mechanism can promote the development of novel therapies.

Three classes of inhibition have been found for AARS inhibitors (Table 1). The most common compounds (Type Ia) either mimic the reaction intermediate AA-AMP (AA-AMS)29 or occupy the AA-AMP-binding site (mupirocin, for isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase)40. HF functions by binding prolyl-tRNA synthetase in an ATP-dependent way and mimics both the amino acid and tRNA 3′-A76 (Type Ib)38,41. AN2690 inhibits fungal leucyl-tRNA synthetase by binding to the editing site and covalently immobilizing the 3′ A76 nucleotide of tRNA (Type Ic)39. In contrast, our structural and experimental data indicate that BN binds to all three key substrate-binding subsites in the ThrRS enzymatic pocket, physically excluding all three physiological ThrRS substrates. Inhibition of translation by BN can be rescued by the addition of each substrate, indicating that BN functions as a triple-competitive inhibitor. Despite its absence of structural resemblance to any substrate and lack of chemically similar interactions, the macrolide ring of BN extends into each of the core substrate-binding subsites of the ThrRS active site cavity, thereby defining a new class (Type II) of AARS inhibitor (Fig. 5).

Figure 5: BN represents a new class of AARS inhibitor.
figure5

All aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (AARSs) contain three pockets for binding its natural substrates (amino acid, ATP and tRNA-A76) to catalyse the two-step aminoacylation reaction. It involves the activation of amino acid by ATP to form an aminoacyl adenylate (AA-AMP), followed by a transfer of the aminoacyl-group from the high-energy intermediate AA-AMP to the 3′-OH of tRNA. Type Ia inhibitors including AA-AMS, Agrocin 84, mupirocin etc., mimic AA-AMP and occupy amino acid and ATP pockets (see also Table 1). The type Ib inhibitor halofuginone (HF) mimics prolyl-tRNA 3′-A76, and binds to proline and tRNA-A76 pockets on prolyl-tRNA synthetase (ProRS). The type Ic inhibitor AN2690 co-binds and traps tRNA in the leucyl-tRNA synthetase (LeuRS)-editing domain. The new (type II) inhibitor Borrelidin (BN) binds at a joint region of amino acid, ATP and tRNA pockets, as well as an extra induced-fit pocket in the active site cavity of ThrRS. As an 18-member macrolide, BN does not resemble the native substrates, but binds to the active site of ThrRS through an unseen geometrically fitting mechanism.

In addition to the simultaneous competition with all three substrates of ThrRS, the complex structures indicate that BN wedges open the floor of the ThrRS active site and induces an extra binding site by virtue of its unique macrolide structure. This fourth ‘orthogonal’ site does not overlap with the substrate-binding sites and is formed by mostly hydrophobic residues that close up the cavity in the absence of BN (Fig. 4e,i). Owing to their role in forming inner core packing interactions of the enzyme, these hydrophobic residues are less conserved than other residues forming the catalytic cavity. Most alterations of the BN-binding residues in archaeal ThrRSs are located in this fourth site (Supplementary Fig. 8). Interestingly, BN-resistant mutations (L489 in E. coli) identified in survival screens are also found to be at the fourth site (Supplementary Fig. 7d). The ThrRS of BN-producing and self-resistant bacteria, Streptomyces parvulus, only has 4 out of the 18 key residues (Y334, H488, Y515 and T516) unconserved from the other BN-sensitive bacteria. These residues correspond to H391, F539, Q566 and L567 in human. All of them are located in the fourth site, and oriented to potentially clash with BN in our structure model (Supplementary Fig. 7b). The observation that many substitutions associated with BN resistance map to the fourth BN-binding pocket suggests that it serves as a key site for the kingdom-wide resistance to BN and a hotspot for developing BN resistance (Supplementary Fig. 8). In fact, our results indicate that simply filling the extra site space (L567R) is sufficient to inactivate aminoacylation of ThrRS (Fig. 4f,k) and inhibits its function for protein synthesis. Thus, this fourth BN-binding site further defines BN as a quadrivalent inhibitor that redundantly blocks protein translation through ThrRS.

With an IC50 of 0.8–7 nM against ThrRS function, BN represents one of the most potent of all known AARS inhibitors (Table 1). Recent studies reveal that several clinically significant drug–enzyme complexes are similarly high-affinity active site-directed inhibitors that compete with substrates and isomerize the target to a non-productive conformation34. These results raise the possibility that additional compounds like BN with no structural similarity to amino acids, ATP and tRNAs might be developed to modulate the functions of other AARSs. By visualizing the modular nature of ThrRS-specific recognition by BN, this study may facilitate the rational design of additional novel active site-binding reagents with a range of useful applications.

Methods

Protein preparation

The N-terminal His-tagged human ThrRS (residues 322–723) was constructed in a pET28a vector. The protein was expressed in strain BL21 (DE3) and induced with 0.2 mM isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactoside for 20 h at 16 °C. The cell pellet (from 4 to 8 litres) was lysed in NTA-wash buffer (500 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 30 mM imidazole), loaded onto a Ni-HiTrap column and washed with NTA-wash buffer. The protein was eluted with NTA-elution buffer (500 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 250 mM imidazole). The eluted protein was further purified by a QAE anion exchange column with NaCl gradient. The peak fractions of the protein were then concentrated for crystallization. The N-terminal His-tagged E. coli ThrRS (aa242–642), and the full-length N-terminal His-tagged human ThrRSs (aa1–723) were also prepared similarly.

Crystallization and structure determination

Crystallizations were all done by the sitting drop method. To crystallize human ThrRS–BN complex, protein solution (10 mg ml−1) was pre-mixed with 2 mM BN (BN) at 4 °C. The protein was then crystallized by mixing 0.5 μl of protein solution with 0.5 μl of precipitant solution, containing 0.1 M calcium acetate, 10% PEG4000 and 0.1 M sodium acetate, pH 4.5. After incubation at 18 °C for 3–7 days, the crystals were flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen for data collection with a cryo solution consisting of 0.8 M calcium acetate, 8% PEG4000, 0.8 M sodium acetate, pH 4.5, and 20% glycerol. Diffraction data were obtained from the LS-CAT 21-ID-G beamline at the Advanced Photon Source (APS).

To crystallize E. coli ThrRS–BN complex, protein solution (30 mg ml−1) was pre-mixed with 2 mM BN at 4 °C with/without 5 mM L-Thr, 5 mM AMPcPP and 10 mM MgCl2. The protein was then crystallized by mixing 0.5 μl of protein solution with 0.5 μl of precipitant solution, containing 15% PEG400, 0.1 M MES, pH6.5. After incubation at 18 °C for 3–7 days, the resulting crystals were flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen for data collection using a cryo solution containing 12% PEG400, 0.8 M MES, pH 6.5, and 20% glycerol. Data sets were obtained from beamline 7-1 at the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource (SSRL).

All data sets were integrated and scaled with HKL2000 (ref. 47). The structures were determined by molecular replacement based on the E. coli ThrRS structure (PDB: 1EVK) in programme Molrep48. After corrections for bulk solvent and overall B values, data were refined by iterative cycles of positional refinement and TLS refinement with PHENIX49 and model building with COOT50. All current models have good geometry and no residues are in the disallowed region of the Ramachandran plot. Data collection and model statistics are given in Table 2.

Aminoacylation assay with BN

The aminoacylation assay was carried out in a buffer containing 50 mM HEPES-KOH (pH 7.6), 25 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 5 mM ATP, 2 mg ml−1 yeast tRNA, 10 μM [3H] L-Thr, 0.5–10 nM BN (dissolved in dimethylsulphoxide) and 100 nM of human ThrRS. Reactions were initiated with enzyme and conducted in a 37 °C heat block. After 20 min, reactions were quenched on Whatman filter pads that were presoaked with 5% trichloroacetic acid. The pads were washed three times for 10 min each with cold 5% trichloroacetic acid, once with cold 100% ethanol. The washed pads were then dried. Radioactivity was quantified in a scintillation counter (Beckman Coulter).

In vitro translation assay

The effects of BN and added amino acids on cell-free protein translation were assayed in a rabbit reticulocyte lysate according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Promega), with the exception that no extra amino-acid mix was added in the assays. Firefly luciferase mRNA of 0.02 mg ml−1 was used in all the translation assays. BN of 250 nM was used in the amino acids-rescue assay. To increase the sensitivity to observe the rescuing effect of ATP and tRNAThr on BN inhibition, the original rabbit reticulocyte lysate was diluted by tenfold with buffer A and T, respectively. Buffer A contains 10 μg ml−1 yeast total tRNA, 80 mM KCl, 0.25 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM spermidine and 50 μM amino-acid mixture. Buffer T contains 80 mM KCl, 0.25 mM MgCl2 and 0.1 mM spermidine. The incubation time was increased from 1.5 to 20 h, and everything else was kept the same as non-diluted system.

Yeast viability assay

The translation activities of different human ThrRS mutants were checked in the yeast viability assay, when the yeast ThrRS was replaced with human ThrRS proteins. The cDNA sequences encoding full-length human ThrRS and its mutations were constructed in the p413-GAL1 vector multi-cloning site. The plasmids were then transformed into the yeast tet-promoters Hughes collection (yTHC) mutant strain obtained from Open Biosystems according to the LiAc/ssDNA/PEG method. yTHC was provided in the haploid strain R1158 background (URA: CMV-tTA MATa his3-1 leu2-0 met15-0). The endogenous promoter of yeast cytoplasmic ThrRS gene (ths1) has been replaced with a TET-titratable promoter in the yTHC genome. Thus, the expression of the gene can be switched off by the addition of doxycycline to the yeast’s growth medium. Tenfold serial dilutions of freshly grown yeast cells were spotted onto selective media synthetic complete medium without histodine containing 2% galactose (with or without doxycycline). Plates were incubated at 30 °C for 4 days and then photographed.

Additional information

Accession codes. The atomic coordinates and structure factors of human ThrRS–BN and the two E. coli ThrRS–BN complexes have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) with the accession codes 4P3N, 4P3O and 4P3P, respectively.

How to cite this article: Fang, P. et al. Structural basis for full-spectrum inhibition of translational functions on a tRNA synthetase. Nat. Commun. 6:6402 doi: 10.1038/ncomms7402 (2015).

Accession codes

Accessions

Protein Data Bank

References

  1. 1

    Dickinson, L., Griffiths, A. J., Mason, C. G. & Mills, R. F. Anti-viral activity of two antibiotics isolated from a species of Streptomyces. Nature 206, 265–268 (1965) .

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Liu, C. X. et al. Antifungal activity of borrelidin produced by a Streptomyces strain isolated from soybean. J. Agric. Food Chem. 60, 1251–1257 (2012) .

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Olano, C. et al. Biosynthesis of the angiogenesis inhibitor borrelidin by Streptomyces parvulus Tu4055: insights into nitrile formation. Mol. Microbiol. 52, 1745–1756 (2004) .

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Hutter, R., Poralla, K., Zachau, H. G. & Zahner, H. [Metabolic products of microorganisms. 51. On the mechanism of action of borrelidin-inhibition of the threonine incorporation in sRNA]. Biochem. Z 344, 190–196 (1966) .

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Nass, G. & Hasenbank, R. Effect of Borrelidin on the threonyl-tRNA-synthetase activity and the regulation of threonine-biosynthetic enzymes in Saccharomyces cerivisiae. Mol. Gen. Genet. 108, 28–32 (1970) .

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Sugawara, A. et al. Borrelidin analogues with antimalarial activity: design, synthesis and biological evaluation against Plasmodium falciparum parasites. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 23, 2302–2305 (2013) .

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Dorgerrloh, M. et al. Borrelidin insecticide and herbicide and its peparation by fermentation. Ger Offen 11,, DE 3607287 (1988) .

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Williams, T. F., Mirando, A. C., Wilkinson, B., Francklyn, C. S. & Lounsbury, K. M. Secreted Threonyl-tRNA synthetase stimulates endothelial cell migration and angiogenesis. Sci. Rep. 3, 1317 (2013) .

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Novoa, E. M. et al. Analogs of natural aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase inhibitors clear malaria in vivo. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, E5508–E5517 (2014) .

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Otoguro, K. et al. In vitro and in vivo antimalarial activities of a non-glycosidic 18-membered macrolide antibiotic, borrelidin, against drug-resistant strains of Plasmodia. J. Antibiot. (Tokyo) 56, 727–729 (2003) .

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Wakabayashi, T. et al. Borrelidin is an angiogenesis inhibitor; disruption of angiogenic capillary vessels in a rat aorta matrix culture model. J. Antibiot. (Tokyo) 50, 671–676 (1997) .

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Funahashi, Y. et al. Establishment of a quantitative mouse dorsal air sac model and its application to evaluate a new angiogenesis inhibitor. Oncol. Res. 11, 319–329 (1999) .

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Poralla, K. & Zahner, H. [Metabolic products of microorganisms. 62. The inhibition of the incorporation of threonine in sRNA in cell-free systems and of the synthesis of proteins and nucleic acids in the cell by the antibiotic borrelidin]. Arch. Mikrobiol. 61, 143–153 (1968) .

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Nass, G. & Thomale, J. Alteration of structure of level of threonyl-tRNA-synthetase in Borrelidin resistant mutants of E. coli. FEBS Lett. 39, 182–186 (1974) .

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Nass, G. & Poralla, K. Genetics of borrelidin resistant mutants of Saccharomyces cerivisiae and properties of their threonyl-tRNA-synthetase. Mol. Gen. Genet. 147, 39–43 (1976) .

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Gantt, J. S., Bennett, C. A. & Arfin, S. M. Increased levels of threonyl-tRNA synthetase in a borrelidin-resistant Chinese hamster ovary cell line. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 78, 5367–5370 (1981) .

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Carter, C. W. Jr. Cognition, mechanism, and evolutionary relationships in aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 62, 715–748 (1993) .

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Ibba, M. & Soll, D. Aminoacyl-tRNA synthesis. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 69, 617–650 (2000) .

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Habibi, D. et al. Borrelidin, a small molecule nitrile-containing macrolide inhibitor of threonyl-tRNA synthetase, is a potent inducer of apoptosis in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Invest. New Drugs 30, 1361–1370 (2012) .

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Ruan, B. et al. A unique hydrophobic cluster near the active site contributes to differences in borrelidin inhibition among threonyl-tRNA synthetases. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 571–577 (2005) .

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Francklyn, C., Musier-Forsyth, K. & Martinis, S. A. Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases in biology and disease: new evidence for structural and functional diversity in an ancient family of enzymes. RNA 3, 954–960 (1997) .

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Cusack, S. Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 7, 881–889 (1997) .

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Woese, C. R., Olsen, G. J., Ibba, M. & Soll, D. Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, the genetic code, and the evolutionary process. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 64, 202–236 (2000) .

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Rigden, D. J. Archaea recruited D-Tyr-tRNATyr deacylase for editing in Thr-tRNA synthetase. RNA 10, 1845–1851 (2004) .

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Ibba, M. & Soll, D. Aminoacyl-tRNAs: setting the limits of the genetic code. Genes Dev. 18, 731–738 (2004) .

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Sankaranarayanan, R. et al. Zinc ion mediated amino acid discrimination by threonyl-tRNA synthetase. Nat. Struct. Biol. 7, 461–465 (2000) .

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Sankaranarayanan, R. et al. The structure of threonyl-tRNA synthetase-tRNA(Thr) complex enlightens its repressor activity and reveals an essential zinc ion in the active site. Cell 97, 371–381 (1999) .

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Moras, D. Structural and functional relationships between aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. Trends Biochem. Sci. 17, 159–164 (1992) .

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Belrhali, H. et al. Crystal structures at 2.5 angstrom resolution of seryl-tRNA synthetase complexed with two analogs of seryl adenylate. Science 263, 1432–1436 (1994) .

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Pelham, H. R. & Jackson, R. J. An efficient mRNA-dependent translation system from reticulocyte lysates. Eur. J. Biochem. 67, 247–256 (1976) .

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Kawamura, T. et al. Anti-angiogenesis effects of borrelidin are mediated through distinct pathways: threonyl-tRNA synthetase and caspases are independently involved in suppression of proliferation and induction of apoptosis in endothelial cells. J. Antibiot. (Tokyo) 56, 709–715 (2003) .

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Paetz, W. & Nass, G. Biochemical and immunological characterization of threonyl-tRNA synthetase of two borrelidin-resistant mutants of Escherichia coli K12. Eur. J. Biochem. 35, 331–337 (1973) .

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Copeland, R. A. in Evaluation of Enzyme Inhibitors in Drug Discovery: A Guide for Medicinal Chemists and Pharmacologists 2nd edn 203–244John Wiley and Sons (2013) .

  34. 34

    Blat, Y. Non-competitive inhibition by active site binders. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 75, 535–540 (2010) .

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Torres-Larios, A., Sankaranarayanan, R., Rees, B., Dock-Bregeon, A. C. & Moras, D. Conformational movements and cooperativity upon amino acid, ATP and tRNA binding in threonyl-tRNA synthetase. J. Mol. Biol. 331, 201–211 (2003) .

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Gao, Y. M. et al. Borrelidin, a potent antifungal agent: insight into the antifungal mechanism against Phytophthora sojae. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 60, 9874–9881 (2012) .

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Schulze, C. J. et al. Borrelidin B: isolation, biological activity, and implications for nitrile biosynthesis. J. Nat. Prod. 77, 2570–2574 (2014) .

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Sundrud, M. S. et al. Halofuginone inhibits TH17 cell differentiation by activating the amino acid starvation response. Science 324, 1334–1338 (2009) .

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Rock, F. L. et al. An antifungal agent inhibits an aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase by trapping tRNA in the editing site. Science 316, 1759–1761 (2007) .

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    Silvian, L. F., Wang, J. & Steitz, T. A. Insights into editing from an ile-tRNA synthetase structure with tRNAile and mupirocin. Science 285, 1074–1077 (1999) .

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41

    Zhou, H., Sun, L., Yang, X. L. & Schimmel, P. ATP-directed capture of bioactive herbal-based medicine on human tRNA synthetase. Nature 494, 121–124 (2013) .

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42

    Gadakh, B. & Van Aerschot, A. Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase inhibitors as antimicrobial agents: a patent review from 2006 till present. Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 22, 1453–1465 (2012) .

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43

    Kim, D. G. et al. Chemical inhibition of prometastatic lysyl-tRNA synthetase-laminin receptor interaction. Nat. Chem. Biol. 10, 29–34 (2014) .

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44

    Pines, M., Snyder, D., Yarkoni, S. & Nagler, A. Halofuginone to treat fibrosis in chronic graft-versus-host disease and scleroderma. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 9, 417–425 (2003) .

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45

    Keller, T. L. et al. Halofuginone and other febrifugine derivatives inhibit prolyl-tRNA synthetase. Nat. Chem. Biol. 8, 311–317 (2012) .

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46

    Baker, S. J. et al. Discovery of a new boron-containing antifungal agent, 5-fluoro-1,3-dihydro-1-hydroxy-2,1- benzoxaborole (AN2690), for the potential treatment of onychomycosis. J. Med. Chem. 49, 4447–4450 (2006) .

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47

    Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Methods Enzymol. 276, 307–326 (1997) .

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48

    Vagin, A. & Teplyakov, A. Molecular replacement with MOLREP. Acta. Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 22–25 (2010) .

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49

    Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta. Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 213–221 (2010) .

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50

    Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta. Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 486–501 (2010) .

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51

    Hughes, J. & Mellows, G. Interaction of pseudomonic acid A with Escherichia coli B isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase. Biochem. J. 191, 209–219 (1980) .

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52

    Racher, K. I., Kalmar, G. B. & Borgford, T. J. Expression and characterization of a recombinant yeast isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase. J. Biol. Chem. 266, 17158–17164 (1991) .

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53

    Capobianco, J. O., Doran, C. C. & Goldman, R. C. Mechanism of mupirocin transport into sensitive and resistant bacteria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 33, 156–163 (1989) .

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54

    Pope, A. J. et al. Characterization of isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase from Staphylococcus aureus. I: Kinetic mechanism of the substrate activation reaction studied by transient and steady-state techniques. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 31680–31690 (1998) .

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55

    Teng, M. et al. Identification of bacteria-selective threonyl-tRNA synthetase substrate inhibitors by structure-based design. J. Med. Chem. 56, 1748–1760 (2013) .

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56

    Hoepfner, D. et al. Selective and specific inhibition of the Plasmodium falciparum lysyl-tRNA synthetase by the fungal secondary metabolite cladosporin. Cell. Host. Microbe. 11, 654–663 (2012) .

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57

    Werner, R. G. Uptake of indolmycin in gram-positive bacteria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 18, 858–862 (1980) .

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58

    Reader, J. S. et al. Major biocontrol of plant tumors targets tRNA synthetase. Science 309, 1533 (2005) .

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59

    Stefanska, A. L., Fulston, M., Houge-Frydrych, C. S., Jones, J. J. & Warr, S. R. A potent seryl tRNA synthetase inhibitor SB-217452 isolated from a Streptomyces species. J. Antibiot. (Tokyo) 53, 1346–1353 (2000) .

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60

    Chu, T. L., Guan, Q., Nguan, C. Y. & Du, C. Halofuginone suppresses T cell proliferation by blocking proline uptake and inducing cell apoptosis. Int. Immunopharmacol. 16, 414–423 (2013) .

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61

    Derbyshire, E. R., Mazitschek, R. & Clardy, J. Characterization of Plasmodium liver stage inhibition by halofuginone. ChemMedChem 7, 844–849 (2012) .

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62

    Hu, Q. H. et al. Discovery of a potent benzoxaborole-based anti-pneumococcal agent targeting leucyl-tRNA synthetase. Sci. Rep. 3, 2475 (2013) .

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr P. Schimmel, R.A. Copeland and L. Hedstrom for comments, Dr D.J. Slade for assistance in data collection. Use of the Advanced Photon Source and Advanced Light Source are supported by the US Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357, DE-AC02-05CH11231. Use of the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, is supported by the US Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC02-76SF00515 and by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences including P41GM103393. This work was supported by the Korean Global Frontier Project grant NRF-M1AXA002-2010-0029785 to S.K., grants from the National Institutes of Health NIEHS T32 ES007122-23 to A.M., GM54899 to C.S.F., GM100136 and GM106134 to M.G.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

P.F., X.Y., S.K., C.S.F. and M.G. designed all experiments. P.F., X.Y., S.J., A.M., K.C., X.C. and M.G. performed the experiments. All authors analysed the data and contributed to manuscript preparation. P.F., X.Y., C.S.F. and M.G. wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Christopher S. Francklyn or Min Guo.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures 1-10 and Supplementary References (PDF 2792 kb)

Supplementary Movie 1

This movie shows the detailed binding of BN to human and E. coli ThrRS. Clearly seen in how tightly bound BN sterically clashes with all 3 substrates of ThrRS: L-Thr, ATP and tRNA. The renderings used 6 structures analyzed in this work (PDB: 4P3N, 4P3O, 4P3P, 1EVK, 1NYR, 1QF6). This movie is prepared with ICM molecular modeling suite (Molsoft LLC) and PyMOL (www.pymol.org). (MOV 7594 kb)

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fang, P., Yu, X., Jeong, S. et al. Structural basis for full-spectrum inhibition of translational functions on a tRNA synthetase. Nat Commun 6, 6402 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7402

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter for a daily update on COVID-19 science.
Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing