Abstract
Ocean eddies (with a size of 100–300 km), ubiquitous in satellite observations, are known to represent about 80% of the total ocean kinetic energy. Recent studies have pointed out the unexpected role of smaller oceanic structures (with 1–50 km scales) in generating and sustaining these eddies. The interpretation proposed so far invokes the internal instability resulting from the largescale interaction between upper and interior oceanic layers. Here we show, using a new highresolution simulation of the realistic North Pacific Ocean, that ocean eddies are instead sustained by a different process that involves smallscale mixedlayer instabilities set up by largescale atmospheric forcing in winter. This leads to a seasonal evolution of the eddy kinetic energy in a very large part of this ocean, with an amplitude varying by a factor almost equal to 2. Perspectives in terms of the impacts on climate dynamics and future satellite observational systems are briefly discussed.
Introduction
The oceanic flow is known to be highly turbulent involving a very broad range of scales from O(1,000 km) down to O(1 m) and even smaller scales^{1}. As such, it is driven by nonlinear scale interactions that can transfer energy upscale or downscale. Oceanic eddies (100–300 km), also called mesoscale eddies, are known to explain not only most of the total kinetic energy (KE) in the oceans^{1}, but also most of the turbulent dispersion and transport of tracers such as heat and carbon dioxide in oceanic basins^{1,2,3,4}. KE associated with mesoscale eddies is monitored from space by satellite altimeters and these eddies are also explicitly resolved in presentday realistic ocean numerical simulations. Until recently, the broadly accepted paradigm is that these eddies are generated and sustained by the instability of the largescale vertical current shear (or horizontal gradient of quasigeostrophic potential vorticity (QGPV)) in the ocean interior. Such instability occurs when the sign of QGPV horizontal gradients changes with depth and related studies showed that this depth is around 800–1,000 m. The resulting mesoscale turbulent dynamics is referred to as the Phillips regime^{5} (after the seminal work of Phillips^{6} related to baroclinic instability in the ocean interior) and leads to a velocity spectrum with a k^{−3} slope, with k being the wavenumber. In this regime, smallerscale structures (O(1–50 km)), also called submesoscales, are therefore very weakly energetic and have little impact on mesoscale eddies, except in terms of KE dissipation.
However, recent reanalysis of satellite altimeter and in situ data^{7,8,9,10} have pointed out that submesoscales are much more energetic than expected in many regions of the oceans, involving a k^{−2} spectrum slope over a large range of scales, which suggests an impact of these small scales on larger scales. This questioned the paradigm related to the Phillips regime. Idealized modelling studies of the last 8 years^{2,11,12,13,14,15} led to the proposition of an alternative interpretation. This interpretation invokes the instability derived from the interaction between the largescale positive QGPV gradient in the upper layers (induced by largescale surface density anomalies) and the negative QGPV gradient in the interior. The resulting mesoscale turbulent regime is known as the Charneylike regime^{5,15} (after the original work of Charney^{16}). Properties of this surfaceintensified regime involve a velocity spectrum with a k^{−2} slope (instead of a k^{−3} slope for the Phillips regime). In this Charney regime, submesoscale structures, which result from frontogenesis triggered by the convergences induced by mesoscale eddies^{12,15,17}, are associated with a vigorous vertical velocity field, indicating a significant transformation of potential energy (PE) into KE at these scales^{11,14}. The resulting submesoscale KE then feeds up mesoscale eddies and larger scales through an inverse KE cascade^{11,14} (that is, KE fluxing from small to larger scales through the nonlinear interactions). However, subsequent investigations of these different regimes in the global ocean^{5} have revealed a dominance of the Phillips regime in energetic eastward currents such as the Gulf Stream and the Kuroshio, whereas the Charney regime may dominate in some other parts of the oceans. This questions the validity of the interpretation of observational results in terms of the Charneylike regime in many regions including the energetic eastward currents.
In the present study, we address this question using a new realistic simulation of the North Pacific Ocean at high resolution (in both the horizontal and vertical directions, see Methods section)^{18} forced by atmospheric reanalysis data. Results highlight the dominance of a class of submesoscales different from what is expected from the Charney regime. These submesoscales are mostly energetic in winter and are related to mixedlayer instabilities^{19} (MLIs, a specific frontal instability occurring when the mixedlayer depth (MLD) is large and vertical mixing vigorous^{20}). They emerge in a very large region of the North Pacific Ocean that covers areas such as the Kuroshio and the whole subtropical gyre. These MLIs have been recently revisited in the oceanic case^{20,21,22,23,24} but their specific impacts on mesoscale eddies and larger scales are still unknown. We estimate these impacts through a 2year analysis of the new realistic simulation. Results indicate that the impact of the winter MLIs on mesoscale KE clearly overcomes other dynamical regimes: the resulting submesoscale KE feeds larger scales through an efficient inverse KE cascade, leading to a strong seasonal modulation of the eddy KE (in the 100–300 km band).
Results
Seasonality of submesoscales in the North Pacific Ocean
The surface relative vorticity fields in the western part of the North Pacific Ocean (Fig. 1) reveal a strong seasonality of submesoscales, with winter being much more energetic than summer. This western part captures most of the seasonality of submesoscales of the whole North Pacific Ocean (Supplementary Fig. 1a,b). The field on 15 March 2002 (Fig. 1a) displays mesoscale eddies and a very large number of submesoscale features, such as elongated filaments and smallscale vortices. It is characterized by a strong positive skewness indicating a dominance of cyclones with maximum values close to 2.2 f (with f the Coriolis frequency). During this period, vertical motions with small scales and large amplitudes (>10 m per day) are present within the ML (Fig. 2a,c), whose depth, averaged over 1 month, varies between 100 and 300 m (Supplementary Fig. 2a). Some vertical motions notably extend well below the ML (Fig. 2a,c). On 15 September 2002 (Fig. 1b), there is a less dense population of submesoscales and the root mean squared (r.m.s.) value of the relative vorticity is smaller by a factor close to 1.7. Amplitudes of vertical motion within the ML, whose thickness is less than 60 m (Supplementary Fig. 2b), are commonly weaker (mostly <5 m per day; Fig. 2b,d). Below the ML, vertical motions have amplitudes larger than 5 m per day, but their horizontal scales are not as small as in winter. The vigorous submesoscale activity in winter is further illustrated by the Ertel potential vorticity (EPV; see Methods section) field at 25 m depth in March (Fig. 3) and in particular by the existence of strong negative EPV (lesser than −2e−9 s^{−3}) associated with submesoscale fronts. Such features, not observed in summer, indicate that submesoscale filaments can be affected by frontal/ML instabilities and produce smallscale vortices^{20}.
These differences between winter and summer are quantified by the time series of the r.m.s. values of relative vorticity estimated from surface motions (black curve in Fig. 4a) in the domain (~4,000 km × 2,300 km) indicated in Fig. 1. This time series exhibits a significant seasonality, with large (small) values in late winter (summer), with a factor close to 1.7 consistent with Fig. 1a,b. Such seasonality is corroborated by the time evolution of the total length of zero relative vorticity contours (green curve in Fig. 4a). The relative vorticity obtained from surface motions has been found to be conspicuously close to the geostrophic relative vorticity (obtained from geostrophic currents estimated by assuming that the Coriolis forces balance the sea surface height (SSH) horizontal gradients in the momentum equations; red curve in Fig. 4a). Correlation between the two time series is 0.97. This indicates that, despite the large r.m.s. relative vorticity values (close to 0.2 f in winter), the surface flow is statistically in geostrophic equilibrium as reported in previous studies^{11}. This result is also confirmed by the closeness of velocity spectra deduced from geostrophic currents and surface currents (Supplementary Fig. 3): spectra of ageostrophic currents (the difference between surface and geostrophic currents) exhibit amplitudes 10 (4) times smaller at a wavelength of 50 (25) km. In other words, highresolution SSH data capture not only mesoscale eddies and largerscale motions but also most of the submesoscale horizontal motions and their seasonality. Interestingly, the time series of the r.m.s. geostrophic relative vorticity (related to SSH by a Laplacian operator) differs much from that of the r.m.s. SSH (blue curve in Fig. 4a): correlation between the two is −0.44. On one hand, this indicates that geostrophic relative vorticity well characterizes the strong emergence of energetic submesoscales in winter. On the other hand, it reveals that the largest scales (that dominate the r.m.s. SSH) are not affected by seasonality and therefore are driven by other mechanisms as discussed later.
Dynamical impact of submesoscales on larger scales
Figure 4b shows the time series of the transformation of PE into KE (see Methods section; black curve). Its positive sign indicates a net source for KE over the western part of the North Pacific Ocean. This time series displays strong seasonal variations and is close to that of the r.m.s. values of the vertical velocity within the ML (red curve). Both time series correlate well with that of the MLD averaged over the whole domain (blue curve in Fig. 4b): correlation between MLD and vertical velocity (transformation of PE into KE) is close to 0.96 (0.93), which is consistent with the previous studies^{22,23}. These time series, and in particular that related to the KE source (black curve in Fig. 4b), display a seasonality in phase with the relative vorticity (black curve in Fig. 4a), suggesting that the submesoscale field is seasonally forced. However, the time series in Fig. 4b exhibit a sudden decay in late winter not observed for the relative vorticity. As a result, correlation of these times series with the relative vorticity is merely 0.69. Thus, abrupt decay of these time series, and in particular that related to the transformation of PE into KE, have no immediate impact on the meso/submesoscale field. Since this field is no more forced after this abrupt decay, this suggests that it evolves, at least in the submesoscale range, as a twodimensional (2D) turbulent flow in free decay^{25}. The MLD seasonal evolution is induced by atmospheric forcing as already pointed out by previous studies^{23,26}, suggesting that production of submesoscales in winter is controlled by largescale atmospheric forcing via the mixedlayer deepening. These results, however, do not provide detailed information on the different scales involved in this seasonality.
To further investigate the production of submesoscales and their dynamical impact (in terms of KE) on larger scales through the nonlinear interactions, several spectral analyses in the wavenumber space have been conducted in four subdomains covering the western part of the North Pacific Ocean and then averaged to get reliable statistics in the full domain (see Methods section). The velocity spectrum in March (black curve in Fig. 5a) displays a peak around 250 km and a k^{−2} slope for smaller scales. The September velocity spectrum (red curve in Fig. 5a) exhibits a peak at 300 km with slightly larger amplitude than that in March but involves a steeper slope (close to k^{−3}) for smaller scales. Differences between these spectral slopes explain the factor 2 increase in winter (relative to summer) displayed by the KE time series in the 10–200 km band (black curve in Fig. 4c). Spectrum of the ML vertical velocity in winter (black curve in Fig. 5b) is closely related to MLIs: it displays a peak at a wavenumber corresponding to a wavelength close to 30 km (that is, close to the most unstable MLI wavelength (24 km), see Methods section), whereas the September spectrum (red curve in Fig. 5b) displays a peak at a wavelength of 150 km.
Spectra of the transformation of PE into KE (Fig. 5c) have been estimated to better highlight the scales involved in the KE source. They display similar features as for the vertical velocity. The winter spectrum (black curve) reveals a peak at a wavelength close to 30 km, whereas the summer spectral peak (red curve) is close to 125 km. Differences between the two spectra highlight the enhanced KE source in winter relative to summer with a dominant KE source at small scale (30 km). Note that these characteristics do not display much dispersion in subdomains (Supplementary Fig. 4).
Impact of submesoscales on larger scales (through nonlinear interactions) has been examined by estimating KE spectral fluxes. From its definition (see Methods section), this quantity, at a given wavenumber k, corresponds to the KE that fluxes from smaller wavenumbers (larger scales) to larger wavenumbers (smaller scales). Thus, a positive (negative) value corresponds to a direct (inverse) KE cascade. Results in winter (black curve in Fig. 5d) reveal a significant inverse KE cascade, that is, a KE flux from scales close to 25 km to larger scales (a smaller direct KE cascade is observed for scales smaller than 25 km). As a result, about 70% (40%) of the KE flux at 200 km in winter is explained by the contributions of scales smaller than 100 km (50 km). This highlights the significant dynamical impact of submesoscales on larger scales: a large part of the KE produced at submesoscales feeds up larger scales. During summer (red curve in Fig. 5d), contribution of scales smaller than 100 km (50 km) corresponds to only 25% (0%) of the KE flux at 200 km. Note that these winter and summer fluxes do not display much dispersion in eastern and western subdomains (Supplementary Fig. 5). These spectral fluxes explain the shallower slope of the velocity spectrum in winter (k^{−2}) relative to summer (close to k^{−3}) indicating that all scales are fed by winter submesoscales. They also explain the seasonal tendency of the KE time series in the 10–100 and 100–200 km bands (purple and green curves in Fig. 4d): the seasonal variations in the 10–100 km (100–200 km) band display a factor 3 (1.8) increase in winter relative to summer. Furthermore, the KE peaks in the 100–200 km band emerge about 1 month after the ones in the 10–100 km band. This is consistent with the smooth decrease of the relative vorticity (black curve in Fig. 4a) after the abrupt decay of the transformation of PE into KE (black curve in Fig. 4b) mentioned before as well as that of the KE in the 10–100 km band (purple curve in Fig. 4d), whereas the KE in the 100–200 km band continues to increase (green curve in Fig. 4d). Indeed, it takes time for the KE to cascade from small to larger scales. The same tendency is observed for the time series in the 200–300 km band, although the seasonal variations are smaller (factor close to 1.5) and not so pronounced. Furthermore, mean amplitudes of time series in the 100–200 and 200–300 km bands are more than twice than that in the 10–100 km band (Fig. 4c,d). These larger scales are indeed affected by mechanisms other than MLIs (such as the interior baroclinic instability). All these results emphasize, in the western North Pacific Ocean, a significant seasonal modulation of a large part of oceanic mesoscale eddies by largescale atmospheric forcing (via the winter mixedlayer deepening). This modulation occurs through an energy pathway involving the transformation of PE into KE enhanced at submesoscales and an inverse KE cascade towards larger scales.
The time series of vertical motions below the ML (Supplementary Fig. 6) indicate that the seasonal modulation also affects deeper layers down to 500 m. Spectra of the vertical motions and transformation of PE into KE at 300 m in March and September exhibit different slopes for smaller scales (pastel curves in Fig. 5b,c), suggesting a larger contribution of these scales in winter. However, their spectral peaks (close to 200 km) indicate a dominant KE source at mesoscales, suggesting again instability mechanisms other than MLIs. This is consistent with the KE time series in the 200–300 km band (red curve in Fig. 4c) that exhibits a seasonality not so pronounced as the one for the 100–200 km band. However, the mean amplitude of this time series (200–300 km band) is smaller than that for the 10–200 km band (black curve in Fig. 4c), which emphasizes that most of the KE in the submesoscale–mesoscale band are affected by seasonality induced by the production of submesoscales in winter.
Discussion
A new realistic simulation of the North Pacific Ocean at high resolution highlights an efficient energy pathway, involving winter frontal instabilities at submesoscale set up by largescale atmospheric forcings, which catalyses a significant seasonal modulation of the KE over a broad scale range (including submesoscales and mesoscales). This leads, in most of the western part of the North Pacific Ocean, to a factor 2 KE increase in winter relative to summer for this scale range. These results depart from the previous interpretation involving the Charneylike regime about the generation of submesoscales, although the connection with mesoscale eddies (through an inverse KE cascade) and the resulting k^{−2} velocity spectrum slope are similar. They much better explain the observational results^{7,8,9,10} in regions known to be dominated by the Phillipslike regime (such as the Kuroshio). At last, they clearly highlight the dominant role of MLIs on the seasonality of the mesoscale eddy KE in a large region of the North Pacific Ocean. An exception is the Subtropical Countercurrent located in the southern boundary of our domain where the seasonality of mesoscale turbulence appears to result from two concurring baroclinic instabilities^{27}.
Results of our study point out to the need to further analyse satellite and in situ data with a specific focus on the seasonality. The strength of the seasonally varying atmospheric forcing indeed varies from one year to the other and this should affect the interannual variability of the meridional heat fluxes since these fluxes strongly depend on the upper ocean turbulence^{2}. The ocean biogeochemical system, on the other hand, is known to strongly depend on the vertical velocity field (that uplifts nutrients from deeper layers into the lighted surface layer) at small scale in the first 300–400 m below the ocean surface^{28,29,30} as well as on the phase relationship of this vertical velocity field with horizontal motions^{30,31}. The mechanisms described in this study, which point to the importance of the seasonally varying eddies and smallscale fronts, the ocean weather, may significantly affect this biogeochemical system and consequently (using the same argument as before) affect the part of its interannual variability explained by the atmospheric forcing. At last, monitoring such seasonal modulation requires highresolution observations on a global scale, which is a major challenge. However, the resulting meso/submesoscale field has been found to be statistically in geostrophic equilibrium at all seasons. This means that such modulation can be diagnosed (using the geostrophic approximation) from SSH data from the future Surface Water Ocean Topography (SWOT)^{32} and Coastal and Ocean Measurement Mission with Precise and Innovative Radar Altimeter (COMPIRA)^{33} wideswath altimeter missions (see Methods section) that should capture scales 10 times smaller (about 10 km) than what conventional altimeters can do.
Results of this paper highlight the tremendous wealth of the dynamical impact of small scales on the ocean circulation and, as such, suggest further studies with increasing spatial resolution. Thus, the emergence of structures with negative EPV during winter emphasizes the need to further investigate their impact in terms of KE source or dissipation, which requires nonhydrostatic models with higher spatial resolution than the one considered in this study. In the real mixed layer, smallscale turbulence (driven by buoyancy losses and wind stresses) is another important source of energy which also peaks in winter. This turbulence is likely to be confined to scales smaller than the MLIs, but it may interact and modify the instabilities. These interactions are not captured by the model used in this paper because they are too small to be resolved.
Methods
Mixedlayer depth
The MLD in this study is defined as the depth at which potential density is different from the sea surface density by 0.03 σ_{θ}.
Realistic simulation at high resolution
We analyse output from a highresolution (1/30° in the horizontal and 100 vertical levels) hindcast simulation of the North Pacific (100°E–70°W and 20°S–66°N) using the Ocean General Circulation Model for the Earth Simulator (OFES)^{18,34,35}. For horizontal mixing of momentum and tracers, a biharmonic operator is applied to reduce numerical noise and the vertical mixing scheme of ref. 36 is used. The model is forced by surface wind stresses and heat fluxes estimated from the 6hourly Japanese 25year Reanalysis (JRA25)^{37}. As the initial state, the output on 1 January 2000 from a 1/10° hindcast simulation starting from 1979 is used. The simulation has been integrated for 3 years from 2000 to 2002 (ref. 18) and a longer integration is in progress.
Ertel potential vorticity
The 3D field of the EPV is estimated by
where ω_{a} and b are the absolute vorticity and buoyancy vectors, respectively vectors. A negative EPV should lead to symmetric instabilities^{38}.
Transformation from PE into KE
The net release of PE transferring into KE within the MLD has been estimated from the following equation^{20,21,22,23},
where the angle bracket is averaging over the horizontal box region, w is vertical velocity and b is buoyancy. The PK in the full domain is estimated by averaging those in the four subdomains.
Wavenumber spectral analyses
Wavenumber spectral analyses^{18} have been conducted in four subdomains, each with a size of 11° in the longitude and 23° in the latitude. Each subdomain is made double periodic (that is, periodic in both zonal and meridional directions) by doubling its size. To focus on the mesoscale part of the ocean turbulence, zonal mean values are removed. Note that these zonal mean values have been found to affect only scales larger than 300 km. In each subdomain (148–159°E, 159–170°E, 170°E–179°W, or 179–168°W, and 20–43°N), the wavenumber spectra are calculated with the spectral slope estimated down to 10 km. The spectra in the full domain (148°E–168°W and 20–43°N) are then obtained from the average of those estimated in the four subdomains. Only the results in 2002 are shown, because the results in 2001 and 2002 are similar.
Length scale of the most unstable wave in the mixed layer
The length scale of the most unstable wave in the mixed layer is estimated by using the expression given by the previous studies^{20,21,39},
where N, h, Ri and f are respectively the buoyancy frequency, MLD, Richardson number and Coriolis frequency. The resulting wavelength averaged in the full domain in March and September 2002 is 2πL=23.8 and 18.0 km, respectively.
The spectral KE flux
The spectral KE flux is defined as the integral of the local horizontal advective term in the KE equation from the wavenumber k to the largest wavenumber k_{s} corresponding to the grid size^{11,40},
where u_{g} denotes the horizontal velocity vector estimated from SSH and ∇_{H} is the horizontal gradient operator. is the horizontal spectral transform and ()* stands for complex conjugate with Re() indicating the real part. To get reliable statistics in the full domain (148°E–166°W and 20–43°N), the spectral KE flux has been estimated by averaging the fluxes calculated in 21 subdomains, 11.5° × 11.5° each, using a Hanning filter. Note that each subdomain is shifted by 5.75° in the both zonal and meridional directions. We use the geostrophic motions, u_{g}, to estimate the spectral fluxes, although these fluxes are known to be also affected by the ageostrophic motions^{11,14}. However, this geostrophic estimation is principally used to differentiate the winter and summer regimes.
SWOT and COMPIRA altimeter missions
Future wideswath satellite altimeter missions, with a resolution 10 times higher than the conventional nadirlooking altimeters, include the SWOT ( http://swot.jpl.nasa.gov/; http://smsc.cnes.fr/SWOT/)^{32} and the COMPIRA^{33} missions. These new missions should provide an unprecedented global measurement of the SSH, in particular, in the submesoscale range.
Additional information
How to cite this article: Sasaki, H. et al. Impact of oceanicscale interactions on the seasonal modulation of ocean dynamics by the atmosphere. Nat. Commun. 5:5636 doi: 10.1038/ncomms6636 (2014).
References
Ferrari, R. & Wunsch, C. Ocean circlation kinetic energy: reservoirs, souces and sinks. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 41, 253–282 (2009).
Lévy, M. et al. Modifications of gyre circulation by submesoscale physics. Ocean Model. 34, 1–15 (2010).
Haza, A. C., Ozgökmen, T. M., Griffa, A., Garaffo, Z. D. & Piterbarg, L. Parameterization of particle transport at submesoscales in the Gulf Stream region using Lagrangian subgridscale models. Ocean Model. 42, 31–49 (2012).
Zhong, Y. & Bracco, A. Submesoscale impacts on horizontal and vertical transport in the Gulf of Mexico. J. Geophys. Res. 104, 5651–5668 (2013).
Tulloch, R., Marshall, J. & Hill, C. Scales, growth rates and spectral fluxes of baroclinic instability in the ocean. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 41, 1057–1076 (2011).
Phillips, N. A. Energy transformations and meridional circulations associated with simple baroclinic waves in a two level, quasigeostrophic model. Tellus 6, 273–286 (1954).
Le Traon, P. Y., Klein, P., Hua, B. L. & Dibarboure, G. Do altimeter wavenumber spectra agree with the interior or surface quasigeostrophic theory? J. Phys. Oceanogr. 38, 1137–1142 (2008).
Lumpkin, R. & Elipot, S. Surface drifter pair spreading in the North Atlantic. J. Geophys. Res. 115, C1207 (2010).
Xu, Y. & Fu, L.L. Global variability of the wavenumber spectrum of oceanic mesoscale turbulence. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 41, 802–809 (2011).
Xu, Y. & Fu, L.L. The effects of altimeter instrument noise on the estimation of the wavenumber spectrum of sea surface height. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 42, 2229–2233 (2012).
Klein, P. et al. Upper ocean turbulence from highresolution 3D simulations. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 38, 1748–1763 (2008).
McWilliams, J. C., Colas, F. & Molemaker, M. J. Cold filamentary intensification and ocanic surface convergence lines. Geophys. Res. Lett. 36, L18602 (2009).
Capet, X., McWilliams, J. C., Molemaker, M. J. & Shchepetkin, A. F. Mesoscale to submesoscale transition in the California current system. part I: flow structure, eddy flux, and observational tests. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 38, 29–43 (2008).
Capet, X., McWilliams, J. C., Molemaker, M. J. & Shchepetkin, A. F. Mesoscale to submesoscale transition in the California current system. part III: energy balance and flux. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 38, 2256–2269 (2008).
Lapeyre, G. & Klein, P. Dynamics of the upper oceanic layers in terms of surface quasigeostrophy theory. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 36, 165––176 (2006).
Charney, J. G. Dynamics of long waves in a baroclinic westerly current. J. Meteor. 4, 135–162 (1947).
Ferrari, R. A. Frontal challenge for climate models. Science 332, 316–317 (2011).
Sasaki, H. & Klein, P. SSH wavenumber spectra in the North Pacific from a highresolution realistic simulation. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 42, 1233–1241 (2012).
Stone, P. H. On nongeostrophic baroclinic instability. J. Atmos. Sci. 23, 390–400 (1966).
Boccaletti, G., Ferrari, R. & FoxKemper, B. Mixed layer instabilities and restratification. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 38, 2228–2250 (2007).
FoxKemper, B., Ferrari, R. & Hallberg, R. Parameterization of mixed layer eddies. Part I: theory and diagnosis. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 38, 1145–1165 (2008).
Capet, X., Campos, E. J. & Paiva, M. Submesoscale activity over the Argentinian shelf. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, 2–6 (2008).
Mensa, J. A. et al. Seasonality of the submesoscale dynamics in the Gulf Stream region. Ocean Dyn. 63, 923–941 (2013).
Shcherbina, A. et al. Statistics of vertical vorticity, divergence, and strain in a developed submesoscale turbulence field. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 4706–4711 (2013).
McWilliams, J. C. Statistical properties of decaying geostrophic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 198, 199–230 (1989).
Qiu, B. & Kelly, K. A. Upper ocean heat balance in the Kuroshio Extension region. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 23, 2027–2041 (1993).
Qiu, B., Chen, S., Klein, P., Sasaki, H. & Sasai, Y. Seasonal mesoscale and submesoscale eddy variability along the North Pacific Subtropical Countercurrent. J. Phys. Oceanogr. doi:10.1175/JPOD140071.1 (in press).
Lévy, M., Ferrari, R., Franks, P. J. S., Martin, A. P. & Rivière, P. Bringing physics to life at the submesoscale. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, L14602 (2012).
Lévy, M., Klein, P. & Treguier, A.M. Impacts of submesoscale physics on phytoplankton production and subduction. J. Mar. Res. 59, 535–565 (2001).
Klein, P. & Lapeyre, G. The oceanic vertical pump induced by mesoscale and submesoscale turbulence. Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci. 1, 351–375 (2009).
Lévy, M. & Martin, A. P. The influence of mesoscale and submesoscale heterogeneity on ocean biogeochemical reactions. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 27, 1139–1150 (2013).
Fu, L.L. & Ferrari, R. Observing oceanic submesoscale processes from space. Eos Trans. AGU 89, 488–488 (2008).
Uematsu, A., Nakamura, R., Nakajima, Y., Yajima, Y. & the JAXA COMPIRA Team., in Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), Melbourne Australia, 2943–2946 (2013).
Masumoto, Y. et al. A fiftyyear eddyresolving simulation of the World Ocean: preliminary outcomes of OFES (OGCM for the Earth Simulator). J. Earth Simul. 1, 35–56 (2004).
Komori, N. et al. Description of seaice component of coupled ocean seaice model for the earth simulator (oifes). J. Earth Simul. 4, 31–45 (2005).
Noh, Y. & Kim, H. J. Simulations of temperature and turbulence structure of the oceanic boundary layer with the improved near‐surface process. J. Geophys. Res. 104, 15621–15634 (1999).
Onogi, K. et al. The jra25 reanalysis. J. Met. Soc. Jpn 85, 369–432 (2007).
Hoskins, B. J. The role of potential vorticity in symmetric stability and instability. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 100, 480–482 (1974).
Nakamura, N. Scale selection of baroclinic instability  effects of stratification and nongeostrophy. J. Atmos. Sci. 45, 3253–3268 (1988).
Scott, R. B. & Wang, F. Direct evidence of an oceanic inverse kinetic energy cascade from satellite altimetry. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 35, 1650–1666 (2005).
Acknowledgements
The simulation was done on the Earth Simulator. This work is partially supported by MEXT/JST KAKENHI (H.S. and Y.S.: 25400473; H.S.: 22106006). P.K. acknowledges the support of IFREMER (through the MOU IFREMERJAMSTEC), CNRS (France) and the Agence Nationale pour la Recherche (Contracts ANR09BLAN036502 (REDHOT) and ANR10LABX1901 (LabexMER)). B.Q. acknowledges support from NASA’s SWOT mission through Grant NNX13AD91G. We thank Pascal Riviere and Aurelien Ponte for their useful remarks on the manuscript, Daisuke Matsuoka for making the images. At last, we dedicate this study to our colleague and friend BachLien Hua, whose intellectual curiosity and scientific ideas much inspired our thoughts during this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
H.S. conceived the central idea and performed the simulation. H.S., P.K. and B.Q. carried out the analysis and wrote the paper. Y.S. provided guidance for the analysis and commented on the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Figures
Supplementary Figures 16 (PDF 471 kb)
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Sasaki, H., Klein, P., Qiu, B. et al. Impact of oceanicscale interactions on the seasonal modulation of ocean dynamics by the atmosphere. Nat Commun 5, 5636 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6636
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6636
This article is cited by

Numerical modeling of internal tides and submesoscale turbulence in the US Caribbean regional ocean
Scientific Reports (2023)

Ocean Circulation from Space
Surveys in Geophysics (2023)

Highresolution simulation of upperocean submesoscale variability in the South China Sea: Spatial and seasonal dynamical regimes
Acta Oceanologica Sinica (2022)

Multisatellite observations of smaller mesoscale eddy generation in the Kuroshio Extension
Acta Oceanologica Sinica (2022)

On the variability of vertical eddy heat flux in the upper ocean
Acta Oceanologica Sinica (2022)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.