Article

Experimental protocol for high-fidelity heralded photon-to-atom quantum state transfer

  • Nature Communications 5, Article number: 5527 (2014)
  • doi:10.1038/ncomms6527
  • Download Citation
Received:
Accepted:
Published online:

Abstract

A quantum network combines the benefits of quantum systems regarding secure information transmission and calculational speed-up by employing quantum coherence and entanglement to store, transmit and process information. A promising platform for implementing such a network are atom-based quantum memories and processors, interconnected by photonic quantum channels. A crucial building block in this scenario is the conversion of quantum states between single photons and single atoms through controlled emission and absorption. Here we present an experimental protocol for photon-to-atom quantum state conversion, whereby the polarization state of an absorbed photon is mapped onto the spin state of a single absorbing atom with >95% fidelity, while successful conversion is heralded by a single emitted photon. Heralded high-fidelity conversion without affecting the converted state is a main experimental challenge, in order to make the transferred information reliably available for further operations. We record >80 s−1 successful state transfer events out of 18,000 s−1 repetitions.

Introduction

Trapped single atomic ions are well suited for implementing quantum memories and processors, as they allow for long quantum information storage times and high-fidelity state manipulation and read-out1,2,3,4. Optical photons, on the other hand, are the most viable carriers of quantum information over long distances5,6. The integration of ion-based quantum processing nodes and photonic quantum communication in order to form a quantum network7,8 appears therefore particularly attractive. Remarkable fidelity and efficiency have been achieved in experiments on photon storage and read-out with atomic ensembles9; we focus on single-atom systems because of their prospect of processing the transmitted quantum information via local quantum gate operations10. Using single ions or atoms as senders and receivers of single photons requires controlling the emission11 and absorption processes, which, however, suffers from low efficiencies, most of all because of incomplete overlap between the spatial profile of the atomic emission or absorption and the photonic mode12. Even with approaches that employ optical resonators13,14,15 or a deep parabolic mirror16,17, results have so far remained limited to overall fidelities below 10%. A possible remedy, which makes the fidelity of the state transfer process independent from its efficiency, is to filter out successful events by a heralding signal; this has been proposed18,19,20 and successfully applied for the creation of remote atom–atom entanglement21,22. It has also been proposed for mapping a photonic polarization state onto an atomic quantum bit by heralding the single-photon absorption with the detection of another single photon emitted in a Raman process23,24, but experimental approaches so far have only used a fluorescence signal as herald, which does not preserve the atomic state12,25,26.

Here we present the experimental implementation of a protocol for high-fidelity photon-to-atom state mapping heralded by Raman emission of a single photon. Out of 18,000 s−1 runs of the protocol, we obtain >80 s−1 successful state transfer events with 97% state fidelity and 95% process fidelity. The single absorption events in this proof-of-principle experiment are driven by multi-photon laser pulses, but the results demonstrate that the state transfer protocol may be readily implemented with true single photons.

Results

Experimental protocol and setup

Figure 1 illustrates the principle of the experiment, which adapts an earlier proposal23 to our atomic system, a single 40Ca+ ion24. A superposition state in the D5/2 manifold is prepared as initial state for heralded absorption. Photons at 854 nm wavelength excite this state to P3/2. For any photon polarization, the corresponding superposition of the σ+ and σ transition is driven. Upon absorption of a photon, the ion returns to the S1/2 ground state (with 93.5% probability, given by the P3/2 branching fractions27), releasing a single photon at 393 nm wavelength28. State mapping is completed by the detection of a π-polarized 393 nm photon; it heralds the absorption process while creating a superposition of the S1/2 sublevels that corresponds to the polarization of the absorbed photon.

Figure 1: Experimental scheme for photon-polarization storage.
Figure 1

Black bars denote the Zeeman sublevels of the involved atomic levels S1/2, D5/2 and P3/2. (a) Preparation: first the ion is optically pumped into the |−1/2› Zeeman sublevel of the S1/2 ground-state manifold (filled green circle); then a sequence of one radio-frequency (RF, gray arrow) and two optical (pink arrows) pulses creates a coherent superposition between |D5/2, m=−3/2› and |D5/2, m=+3/2› (open green circles). (b) Storage: the absorption of an 854 nm photon of arbitrary polarization (red arrows) triggers the emission of a single 393 nm photon (wavy arrows). The detection of a π-polarized 393 nm photon (dark blue) projects the atom into a superposition state in S1/2 that corresponds to the polarization of the absorbed 854 nm photon. (c) Read-out: electron shelving (pink arrow) and atomic-fluorescence detection distinguish the S1/2 sublevels; depending on the desired measurement basis, another RF pulse (gray arrow) is applied before.

In order to verify the state transfer and quantify its fidelity, standard atomic-state analysis29 is performed after the detection of the heralding photon. For measuring the ion in the |±1/2› basis of the S1/2 manifold, the |+1/2› state is transferred (shelved) to the D5/2 manifold. Switching on the cooling lasers then either reveals a fluorescence signal (ion in |−1/2›) or not (ion in |+1/2›). For projecting onto a superposition basis of |±1/2›, a resonant radio-frequency (RF) pulse effects a basis rotation before shelving.

Our experimental setup is sketched in Fig. 2. A single 40Ca+ ion is trapped in a linear radio-frequency (Paul) trap and Doppler cooled by frequency-stabilized diode lasers30. Cooling is facilitated by a static magnetic field, also defining the quantization axis. A narrow-band laser at 729 nm is used for coherent manipulations on the S1/2–D5/2 transition. A laser at 854 nm with variable polarization provides the photons to excite the D5/2–P3/2 transition. For the purpose of demonstrating our experimental protocol, we send many identical photons to the atom in each individual run; quantum state transfer from a single photon to the atom would be attained by the same procedure. In order to coherently control the magnetic-dipole transition coupling the two S1/2 Zeeman states, we use a copper-wire coil placed below the trap. An RF current at 7.8 MHz creates an oscillating magnetic field (perpendicular to the quantization axis) at the position of the ion, driving the magnetic-dipole transition. Blue photons emitted by the ion are collected through two in-vacuum high-numerical aperture (NA) laser objectives (HALOs)31. Photons at 393 nm wavelength are filtered by a polarizer such that only those scattered on π transitions are transmitted. The photons are then coupled to optical fibers and detected by photomultiplier tubes whose output pulses are fed into the sequence-control unit. For single photons at 393 nm, the pulses are in addition time-tagged and stored for later processing.

Figure 2: Experimental setup.
Figure 2

HALO, high-NA laser objective; PMT, photomultiplier tube; PBS, polarizing beam splitter; B, magnetic-field direction. The ion is trapped between the HALOs.

State transfer in circular polarization basis

In a first experiment, we choose the 854 nm light polarization to be right-handed circular, driving σ+ transitions in the atomic system. Hence, only the population in the |D5/2, m=−3/2› state is excited. The detection of a single 393 nm photon in the state |π› then ideally leaves the ion in the state |−1/2›. After detecting a photon, the atomic state is measured in the |±1/2› basis. According to the measurement outcome, the photon arrival times are sorted into two histograms. As can be seen from Fig. 3a, the emission of photons followed by a projection of the atomic state onto |+1/2› is almost completely suppressed. As a reasonable trade-off between high quantum-state fidelity and high photon-detection efficiency, we select only detection events within the first 450 ns of the photonic wave packet. From the number of events in each histogram within this time window, we obtain a fidelity with respect to the ideal atomic state |−1/2› of 97.8(1)%. The measurement was then repeated for left-handed circularly polarized 854 nm light, yielding a fidelity of the atomic state with respect to |+1/2› of 96.4(3)%.

Figure 3: Conditional arrival-time histograms of single 393 nm photons.
Figure 3

(a) Projection onto |+1/2› (blue) and |−1/2› (green) for right-handed circularly polarized 854 nm light. (b) Projection onto the superposition basis for linearly polarized 854 nm light. The red curve shows the sum of the two histograms, that is, the unconditional arrival-time distribution. For each graph, the bin size is 2 ns and the overall measuring time is 20 min.

State transfer of linear polarization

In a second step, we change the 854 nm light polarization to linear. Thus, a superposition of both σ transitions is driven, with the relative phase given by the angle of the linear polarization (which is defined with respect to the plane spanned by the axis of fluorescence collection and the quantization axis). The detection of a scattered |π› photon then heralds the projection of the atomic state onto the superposition of |+1/2› and |−1/2› that corresponds to the 854 nm light polarization. Finally, a π/2 RF pulse is applied before shelving and fluorescence detection, thereby measuring the atomic state in the superposition basis. Figure 3b shows the arrival-time histograms for the two possible measurement outcomes. The oscillations visible in the shapes of the conditional photon wave packets are explained by the difference between the Larmor frequency of the initial superposition of |D5/2, m=±3/2› and that of the final superposition of |S1/2, m=±1/2›. Taking into account the Landé factors, the oscillation period is given by T=h/(1.6 μBB)=160 ns for a static magnetic field B=2.8 G. In addition, the wave packets are approximately twice as long as for circularly polarized 854 nm light, as linear polarizations have a relative overlap with σ transitions of only . This results in lower Rabi frequencies and hence longer wave packets.

In order to show that the detection of a Raman-scattered photon indeed heralds the successful transfer of the polarization state of a laser photon onto the atomic ground state, we analyze contrast and phase of the oscillations in the Raman-photon wave packets. As the phase accumulated in the |D5/2, m=±3/2› superposition before returning to the ground state is directly given by the time duration until the photon is detected, each detection-time value t converts into a phase value . As detection times differing by integer multiples of the Larmor period T yield equivalent final atomic states, we use the reduced phase φ=ϕ mod 2π. For each such phase, we derive from the arrival-time histograms the probability of projecting the ion onto the state |+1/2› after the π/2 RF pulse. For the 450 ns time window, these probabilities are depicted in Fig. 4 for different linear polarizations of the 854 nm light. We observe the expected sinusoidal behaviour as a function of the reduced phase φ, as well as the expected consecutive relative phase shift of π/2 going from V to D, H and A polarized light. From the fitted visibility values V, we obtain the fidelities F of the four generated atomic states with respect to the ideal states corresponding to V, H, D and A polarization, %, 96.4(1)%, 97.0(2)% and 96.9(2)%, respectively. Including the previously determined fidelities for circular polarization, we arrive at an average fidelity of all six reconstructed atomic states with respect to the ideal states of 96.9(1)%.

Figure 4: Atomic-state analysis.
Figure 4

Shown is the probability to find the ion in state |+1/2› after the π/2 RF pulse as a function of the reduced phase φ for the 854 nm light polarizations vertical (V), horizontal (H), diagonal (D) and antidiagonal (A). The solid lines are sinusoidal fits.

The observed quantum-state fidelities are mainly limited by two effects: first, detector dark counts mimic the detection of 393 nm photons (1.7%). Second, spontaneous decay of population from the P3/2 back to the D5/2 state leaves the ion in a mixed state from which it is subsequently transferred to S1/2; the observed contribution (1.4%) is on the order of what is expected from the P3/2 branching fractions. This limitation will not matter in experiments employing true single photons at 854 nm as there is no second photon available for re-exciting the ion. The state fidelity may also be reduced by magnetic-field noise, but here the other two effects were more relevant; in a different realization of the protocol, described below, magnetic-field noise was found to be significant.

Quantum process tomography

Another way of quantifying the transfer fidelity of the mapping process is to perform quantum process tomography. The quantum process ε mapping the photon polarization state ρ onto the atomic state can be expressed as with the Pauli matrices {σi=1,..,4}={, σx, σy, σz} and the process matrix χ (ref. 32). The value |χ11| represents the identity part of the quantum process and is known as the process fidelity. It can be computed using four mutually unbiased polarization states and the resulting atomic states. For a 450 ns time window, we derive a process fidelity of 95.0(2)%, with which the atomic state reproduces the polarization of the absorbed laser photon. It is instructive to analyze the figures of merit of the transfer for different choices of the time window. Figure 5 shows the process fidelity and average state fidelity as a function of the photon-detection probability, the latter being set by the choice of the detection-time window. For our 450 ns time window, we achieve 0.438(1)% average detection efficiency.

Figure 5: State-transfer fidelity.
Figure 5

Process fidelity (blue dots) and average quantum-state fidelity (green dots), characterizing the mapping process, for different heralding probabilities (set through the time-window length indicated by red dots).

Discussion

Reference 2424 discusses various schemes for mapping the polarization state of an absorbed 854 nm photon onto the atomic ground-state qubit, of which we also implemented an alternative one: instead of preparing the ion in a coherent superposition of the |D5/2, m=±3/2› states for absorption, we create a superposition of the states |D5/2, m=±5/2›. The 854 nm light then transfers the ion to the S1/2 ground state by emitting a 393 nm photon on either the σ+ or σ transition. For linearly polarized 854 nm light, the polarization of the scattered photon is maximally entangled with the final atomic spin state: . As emitted photons are collected perpendicularly to the quantization axis, only one specific superposition of |σ+› and |σ› is observed (after removing the polarizer). The detection of the scattered photon thus projects the atomic state onto the superposition of |+1/2› and |−1/2› that corresponds to the 854 nm light polarization. For the 450 ns detection-time window, we achieve 91.7(5)% process fidelity, 94.8(2)% average state fidelity and 0.318(1)% heralding probability. The reduced fidelity as compared with the previous scheme is mostly attributed to the non-linearly33 higher sensitivity of the |±5/2› states to magnetic-field noise.

In conclusion, we demonstrated heralded, high-fidelity mapping of a photonic polarization state onto an atomic quantum bit. After preparing a single 40Ca+ ion in a coherent superposition state, the absorption of a photon on the D5/2–P3/2 transition maps the photonic polarization state onto the atomic S1/2 Zeeman qubit. Successful mapping is heralded by the detection of a Raman-scattered photon at 393 nm wavelength, without perturbing the atomic qubit state. By virtue of our high-NA light-collection optics, the heralding probability amounts to 0.438(1)%. The process fidelity is 95.0(2)% and the average fidelity of the resulting atomic state with respect to the initial polarization amounts to 96.9(1)%. Although in this demonstration we used laser photons to obtain a high interaction rate, the scheme can readily be applied to single photons, for example, from a spontaneous parametric down-conversion (SPDC) source34. Upon absorption of one photon, detection of a 393 nm Raman photon will then herald the entanglement of the partner photon with the ion. This scheme shall be extended to having both entangled partner photons absorbed by ions in remote traps35. Coincidental detection of two 393 nm photons then heralds the entanglement of the two spatially separated ions and completes photon-to-atom entanglement transfer.

Methods

Experimental sequence

All laser beams are controlled through acousto-optic modulators. The sequence starts with a 5 μs pump pulse of σ-polarized light at 397 nm. This prepares the ion in the |−1/2› state of the S1/2 manifold with 99.82(1)% probability. Then a coherent superposition of the |±1/2› states is created by an RF pulse of 2.8 μs duration. Subsequent 729 nm pulses, each lasting 9.6 μs, transfer the superposition to the |±3/2› states of the D5/2 manifold. The 854 nm beam from which a single photon is absorbed is switched on for 3 μs at 12 μW optical power, yielding ~9 MHz Rabi frequency for a 125 μm beam waist. If the Raman-scattered photon is not detected (in most cases), we apply Doppler cooling for 10 μs. Including delays in the control electronics, we achieve a repetition rate of 18 kHz.

Fluorescence detection

Light emitted by the ion is collected through two high-NA laser objectives (NA=0.4), each covering ~4.2% of the total solid angle, and coupled to multi-mode optical fibers with 83% efficiency. The light is then detected by photomultiplier tubes with ~28% quantum efficiency. For isotropic emission, this yields a total detection efficiency of 0.98%.

Atomic-state analysis

After detecting the Raman photon at 393 nm, the atomic state is analyzed: depending on whether a superposition basis is used, first a rotation in the S1/2 manifold is performed by another RF pulse. Then we apply a shelving pulse at 729 nm, which transfers the |+1/2› state to the D5/2 manifold, before switching on the cooling lasers. A projection onto the S1/2 state is signaled by the onset of resonance fluorescence, detected at a rate of 1.07 × 105 s−1. A projection onto D5/2 leaves the ion dark, resulting in a detection rate of 60 s−1 from detector dark counts and laser stray light. Integrating the detection rate for 100 μs allows us to discriminate between the two atomic states with 99.986% fidelity.

Indistinguishability of 393 nm photons

It is important to note that in a single-photon realization of the protocol, the arrival-time distribution of the Raman-scattered photon at 393 nm will not contain any information about the polarization of the single absorbed 854 nm photon. With 854 nm laser light we observe different distributions for different polarizations, as in Fig. 3a,b, . For a single-photon realization, however, the relevant quantity is the peak value of this measured distribution, which is identical for the two cases; the subsequent shape only reflects the temporal behavior of the D5/2-state population for the case of laser excitation.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Kurz, C. et al. Experimental protocol for high-fidelity heralded photon-to-atom quantum state transfer. Nat. Commun. 5:5527 doi: 10.1038/ncomms6527 (2014).

References

  1. 1.

    et al. Experimental demonstration of a robust, high-fidelity geometric two ion-qubit phase gate. Nature 422, 412–415 (2003).

  2. 2.

    et al. Long-lived qubit memory using atomic ions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 060502 (2005).

  3. 3.

    , , & Towards fault-tolerant quantum computing with trapped ions. Nat. Phys 4, 463–466 (2008).

  4. 4.

    et al. A quantum information processor with trapped ions. New J. Phys. 15, 123012 (2013).

  5. 5.

    , , , & Violation of Bell's inequality under strict Einstein locality conditions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5039 (1998).

  6. 6.

    et al. Quantum teleportation over 143 kilometres using active feed-forward. Nature 489, 269–273 (2012).

  7. 7.

    The quantum internet. Nature 453, 1023–1030 (2008).

  8. 8.

    & Quantum networks with trapped ions. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1209 (2010).

  9. 9.

    , , , & Heralded single-magnon quantum memory for photon polarization states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 043601 (2009).

  10. 10.

    et al. Modular entanglement of atomic qubits using both photons and phonons. Preprint at (2014).

  11. 11.

    et al. Quantum-state transfer from an ion to a photon. Nat. Photon. 7, 219–222 (2013).

  12. 12.

    , , , & Heralded photonic interaction between distant single ions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 213603 (2013).

  13. 13.

    , , , & Reversible state transfer between light and a single trapped atom. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 193601 (2007).

  14. 14.

    et al. A single-atom quantum memory. Nature 473, 190–193 (2011).

  15. 15.

    et al. An elementary quantum network of single atoms in optical cavities. Nature 484, 195–200 (2012).

  16. 16.

    et al. Stylus ion trap for enhanced access and sensing. Nat. Phys. 5, 551–554 (2009).

  17. 17.

    et al. Efficient saturation of an ion in free space. Appl. Phys. B (in press) doi:10.1007/s00340-014-5817-y (2014).

  18. 18.

    , , & Creation of entangled states of distant atoms by interference. Phys. Rev. A 59, 1025 (1999).

  19. 19.

    , , , & Entangling distant atoms by interference of polarized photons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 217902 (2003).

  20. 20.

    & Robust long-distance entanglement and a loophole-free Bell test with ions and photons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 110405 (2003).

  21. 21.

    et al. Entanglement of single-atom quantum bits at a distance. Nature 449, 68–71 (2007).

  22. 22.

    et al. Heralded entanglement between widely separated atoms. Science 337, 72–75 (2012).

  23. 23.

    , , & Long distance, unconditional teleportation of atomic states via complete Bell state measurements. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 167903 (2001).

  24. 24.

    & Single calcium-40 ion as quantum memory for photon polarization: a case study. Appl. Phys. B 114, 303–306 (2014).

  25. 25.

    et al. Heralded single-photon absorption by a single atom. Nat. Phys. 7, 17–20 (2011).

  26. 26.

    et al. Photon entanglement detection by a single atom. New J. Phys. 15, 025033 (2013).

  27. 27.

    et al. Precision measurement of the branching fractions of the 4p2P3/2 decay of Ca II. Eur. Phys. J. D 50, 13–19 (2008).

  28. 28.

    , , , & A high-rate source for single photons in a pure quantum state. New J. Phys. 15, 055005 (2013).

  29. 29.

    , & Quantum computing with trapped ions. Phys. Rep. 469, 155–203 (2008).

  30. 30.

    et al. A diode laser stabilization scheme for 40Ca+ single-ion spectroscopy. J. Phys. B 43, 115401 (2010).

  31. 31.

    et al. Quantum interference from remotely trapped ions. New J. Phys. 11, 013032 (2009).

  32. 32.

    & Prescription for experimental determination of the dynamics of a quantum black box. J. Mod. Opt. 44, 2455–2467 (1997).

  33. 33.

    et al. Single qubit manipulation in a microfabricated surface electrode ion trap. New J. Phys. 15, 093018 (2013).

  34. 34.

    , , & Tunable narrowband entangled photon pair source for resonant single-photon single-atom interaction. Opt. Lett. 34, 55–57 (2009).

  35. 35.

    , , , & Heralded mapping of photonic entanglement into single atoms in free space: proposal for a loophole-free Bell test. New J. Phys. 15, 085004 (2013).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge support by the BMBF (QuOReP project, QSCALE Chist-ERA project) and the German Scholars Organization/Alfried Krupp von Bohlen und Halbach-Stiftung.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Universität des Saarlandes, Experimentalphysik, Campus E2 6, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany

    • Christoph Kurz
    • , Michael Schug
    • , Pascal Eich
    • , Jan Huwer
    • , Philipp Müller
    •  & Jürgen Eschner

Authors

  1. Search for Christoph Kurz in:

  2. Search for Michael Schug in:

  3. Search for Pascal Eich in:

  4. Search for Jan Huwer in:

  5. Search for Philipp Müller in:

  6. Search for Jürgen Eschner in:

Contributions

C.K., M.S. and P.E. contributed equally to this work; J.H. set up the narrow-band laser; C.K., M.S. and P.E. prepared the experiment and acquired and analyzed the data; P.M. performed numerical calculations; J.E. planned and supervised the project; C.K. and J.E. wrote the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christoph Kurz.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.