Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Majorana modes and p-wave superfluids for fermionic atoms in optical lattices


The quest for realization of non-Abelian phases of matter, driven by their possible use in fault-tolerant topological quantum computing, has been spearheaded by recent developments in p-wave superconductors. The chiral px+ipy-wave superconductor in two-dimensions exhibiting Majorana modes provides the simplest phase supporting non-Abelian quasiparticles and can be seen as the blueprint of fractional topological order. Alternatively, Kitaev’s Majorana wire has emerged as an ideal toy model to understand Majorana modes. Here we present a way to make the transition from Kitaev's Majorana wires to two-dimensional p-wave superconductors in a system with cold atomic gases in an optical lattice. The main idea is based on an approach to generate p-wave interactions by coupling orbital degrees of freedom with strong s-wave interactions. We demonstrate how this design can induce Majorana modes at edge dislocations in the optical lattice, and we provide an experimentally feasible protocol for the observation of the non-Abelian statistics.


Candidates for topological phases supporting non-Abelian anyons1 with potential application in topological quantum computing2,3 are found among a variety of systems including superfluid 3He-A (ref. 4), the layered superconductor Sr2Ru O4 (ref. 5), the fractional quantum Hall state at (refs 6, 7) and superconductor/topological insulator or similar heterostructures8,9,10,11. Most recently, indium antimonide nano-wires in contact with an s-wave superconductor have shown promising experimental evidence consistent with the presence of the sought-after non-Abelian zero-energy Majorana states12,13. However, many questions still ask for a definitive answer.

Alongside the tremendous progress in solid-state systems, cold atomic gases provide a different angle when looking at p-wave superconductors. Thanks to their largely different strengths and shortcomings compared with solid-state systems, cold atomic gases might offer solutions to problems that are yet hard to address otherwise. For instance, it is well-known that the spatial dimension of a setup can easily be controlled by optical lattices, while Feshbach resonances allow one to tune the interaction strength almost at will14. Unfortunately, the lifetime of p-wave resonant gases was found to be very limited15,16 due to a number of well-understood decay channels17,18. Identifying realizations of atomic p-wave superfluids with a sufficient lifetime emerged as a central challenge in this field. This led to proposals such as Bose–Fermi mixtures in optical lattices19,20,21, microwave dressed polar molecules22, the introduction of synthetic spin-orbit coupling23,24,25,26, the quantum Zeno effect27 or driven dissipation28. However, the complexity in these proposed setups has so far precluded an experimental realization.

Here we present a simple approach to create a strong p-wave interaction for fermions in an optical lattice. The main idea is based on a resonant coupling from the lattice sites to a molecular state residing in the center of the plaquette in analogy to refs 29, 30. The crucial step is that the combination of a lattice setup with different orbital states and s-wave interactions can give rise to a strong induced p-wave pairing; similar ideas have recently been proposed31. We will demonstrate the appearance of p-wave superfluid phases via this coupling. Moreover, a setup intrinsically based on an optical lattice allows one to naturally explore the transition from a two-dimensional (2D) p-wave superfluid to Kitaev's Majorana wire32. Hence we identify different topological transitions33, where the combination of the Fermi surface topology with the symmetry of the p-wave superfluid order parameter gives rise to a rich phase diagram. Most remarkably, we find the appearance of Majorana modes localized at edge dislocations; such edge dislocations correspond to vortices in the phase of the lasers generating the lattice. In combination with another realistic ingredient to modern cold atoms experiments, single site addressability in the lattice34,35, we provide a protocol for the observation of the non-Abelian braiding statistics.


Effective Hamiltonian

We start with the presentation of the Hamiltonian underlying our system. We focus on a setup of spinless fermionic atoms in an optical square lattice. Then, the Hamiltonian is well-described by the tight-binding model

Here and ci denote the fermionic creation (annihilation) operators at lattice site i, while μ is the chemical potential fixing the average particle number and tij denotes the hopping energy between the nearest neighbour sites ‹ij›. To study the transition from a bulk 2D setup to weakly coupled one-dimensional (1D) chains, we allow for an anisotropic hopping tij, where tij=tx(y) for hopping along a link in the x-(y-)direction, respectively. The interaction between the fermions is driven by resonant couplings Hx(y) to two distinct lattice bound states Xp and Yp residing in the center of each plaquette as shown in Fig. 1; similar setups for bosonic atoms have been previously proposed29. Such a coupling is very similar to the well-known two channel model for Feshbach resonances, however, the molecular state only exists due to the presence of the optical lattice, and is localized in space. For spinless fermions on the lattice sites, these bound states must exhibit an odd parity symmetry for a non-vanishing interaction, which in our situation is a twofold degenerate p-wave symmetry. Then, the coupling Hamiltonians reduce to

Figure 1: Lattice setup.
figure 1

Spinless fermions residing at the lattice sites are coupled to a molecular state in the center of each plaquette. The molecular states exhibit a p-wave symmetry and are doubly degenerate. Anisotropic hoppings ty/tx allow for the transition from coupled wires to the 2D isotropic system.

where the summation ∑p runs over all plaquettes. The four lattice sites surrounding each plaquette are labelled as shown in Fig. 1. The couplings to the lattice bound states respect the p-wave symmetry with coupling strength g, while the detuning from resonance is given by . The latter quantity also includes the chemical potential with the energy difference between the molecular state and two free fermions.

The most crucial part is the possibility to induce a strong p-wave interaction by the combination of orbital degrees of freedom and s-wave interactions. Here we provide a sketch of this fundamental idea (for details we refer to the methods section): the two-particle states Xp and Yp in the center of the plaquette consist of two orbital states in the optical lattice forming a repulsively bound state36. For these lattice molecules to fulfil the p-wave symmetry, we choose the lowest (s-wave) and the first excited (p-wave) state in the lattice confining the atoms in the center of the plaquette. Furthermore, the two fermions in the two orbital states have to be in different hyperfine states to profit from a stable s-wave interaction, which can be tuned by conventional Feshbach resonances37. This requires the coupling to the plaquette states to induce transitions between hyperfine states. To summarize: the s-wave interaction leads to the formation of repulsively bound pairs, while the orbital degree of freedom is responsible for the p-wave character of these lattice bound molecules. It is via this mechanism that the optical lattice breaks rotational symmetry and couples to states with different orbital symmetry allowing for the conversion of s-wave to p-wave interactions.

Mean-field theory

We first study the zero temperature phase diagram within mean-field theory. Such a mean-field analysis is well-justified as recent density matrix renormalization group simulations30 have demonstrated the appearance of a p-wave superfluid exhibiting Majorana modes in a double wire setup. The authors of ref. 30 studied a similar interaction between the wires, and demonstrated the qualitative agreement with the mean-field theory predictions. Using density matrix renormalization group simulations, we verified that this qualitative behaviour remains valid also for three-wires for our effective Hamiltonian. As we are here interested in a higher dimensional setup, we expect that the influence of thermal and quantum fluctuations are even further suppressed and the phase diagram is again well-captured within mean-field theory. The resonant coupling between the fermions and the molecular state gives rise to a p-wave pairing for the fermions and leads to a p-wave superfluid. Within mean-field theory the superfluid order parameters take the form Δx=4g‹∑pXp›/N and Δy=4g‹∑pYp›/N, and describe the macroscopic occupation of the zero momentum mode for the molecular states. Then, the Hamiltonian reduces to a quadratic fermionic theory

Here , and N denotes the number of lattice sites. accounts for the conventional operator-independent parts. Furthermore, the tight-binding dispersion for the fermions reduces to , while the gap parameter takes the form of a p-wave superfluid

where a denotes the lattice spacing. Using a Bogoliubov transformation, we obtain the superfluid excitation spectrum , and the ground-state energy per unit cell

with denoting the volume of the first Brillouin zone. The order parameters Δx and Δy are determined by the gap equation minimizing the ground-state energy

The results of the mean-field theory are shown in Fig. 2b: we find a px+ipy superfluid for the fully isotropic setup with tx=ty where ΔxiΔy. In addition to the U(1) symmetry breaking, this phase also breaks time-reversal symmetry. For finite interaction strength the px+ipy superfluid is stable to a small anisotropy in the hopping. Note that the anisotropic behaviour is reflected in the order parameter, that is, |Δx|≠|Δy|. However, we denote a px+ipy superfluid as a phase with a finite order parameter Δx and Δy obeying the fixed phase relation Δxyixy|. For increasing anisotropy txty, transitions into a px (py) superfluid can appear, depending on the value of the chemical potential μ.

Figure 2: Topological phases and mean-field phase diagram.
figure 2

(a) Topological phase diagram: we can distinguish between three different topological regions. However, the topological indices also depend on the order parameter of the superfluid (see main text). The different phases are denoted as for time-reversal invariant and for chiral superfluids with ν the strong topological index and the weak ones. The pictorial insets show the topology of the Fermi surface within each phase. (b) Mean-field phase diagram for : for the rotationally symmetric setup with tx=ty the ground state is given by a px+ipy superfluid, while for strong anisotropy txty a pure px or py superfluid order parameter dominates. The grey dots mark the points where the gap parameters are too small for a convergence of the numerical calculations, and therefore no superfluid phase is accessible for experimentally realistic temperatures. (c,d) Show the gap parameters |Δx|/tx, |Δy|/tx and (|Δx|−|Δy|)/(|Δx|+|Δy|) along a cut through the phase diagram at ty=tx/2 (see arrow in b), as well as the different topological indices. The colour shading corresponds to the topological classification in a, solid (dashed) lines indicate the topological (mean-field) transitions. It is important to stress, that the topological index νy jumps to 1 at a different position than the vanishing of Δy (cf. c and d), that is, the topological transitions are essentially decoupled from the mean-field transitions.

Finally, we point out that at zero temperature true long-range order as predicted within mean-field theory survives, while thermal fluctuations will lead to (quasi) long-range order for our 2D setup. Here we are mainly interested in the topological properties of the system, which are not affected by these phase fluctuations of the order parameter.

Topological phase transitions

In addition to the mean-field transitions, the lattice system also exhibits a series of topological quantum phase transitions beyond those found in the classification of continuum 2D superfluids38. These topological properties are most conveniently studied by analyzing the quadratic Hamiltonian in equation (3), where the superfluid order parameters Δx and Δy determine the symmetries. In the parameter regime, where the superfluid exhibits an excitation gap, the topological properties are characterized by three topological indices33; see the methods section for a simple method to determine the topological indices in our setup. The first one denotes the strong topological index given by the Chern number ν characterizing the 2D px+ipy superfluid, and takes values , see Fig. 2a. In addition, the system exhibits two weak topological indices39,40, which we denote as and . The latter quantities are the topological indices, which characterize the appearance of Majorana modes in Kitaev's Majorana wire32, and can be finite in px superfluids as well as chiral px+ipy superfluids. It is important to stress that the phase boundaries for the topological phase transitions are independent of the strength of the superfluid order parameters, and they only depend on the topology of the Fermi surface. Therefore, we can distinguish between three different regions, see Fig. 2a: region (I) with a closed Fermi surface, region (II) with an open Fermi surface and finally the strong pairing regime (III), where in absence of interactions the system is in a trivial band insulating (vacuum) state. In the latter region (III), the superfluids exhibit no topological order with ; thus it is not of interest in the following.

The combination of the topological indices with the superfluid order parameter allows us now to characterize the different phases. We use the notation for time-reversal invariant superfluids and for chiral superfluids. First, we start with the chiral px+ipx superfluid. Here we obtain two fundamentally different topological phases, see Fig. 2a: (I) the strong topological superfluids cSF−1:00 and cSF1:11 with a finite Chern number . Within the standard symmetry classification scheme41,42,43, the phase is in the symmetry class D (particle–hole symmetry). It is a special property of this phase that the weak indices depend on the chemical potential, that is, we obtain for μ>0 and for μ<0. This property will strongly influence the Majorana modes, see below. In region (II), we find a weak topological superfluid in the symmetry class D (cSF0:01). On the other hand, for the px superfluid, we obtain a weak topological superfluid (SF0:01) in region (II) which belongs to the class BDI, see Fig. 2a. While in the region with closed Fermi surface (I), the superfluid phase becomes gapless (that is, nodal) without any topological properties. For completeness, we point out that the py superfluid is gapless in region (I) and (II).

The full phase diagram is then obtained by combining the mean-field phase diagram in Fig. 2b with the topological properties in Fig. 2a. Its details strongly depend on the strength of the coupling parameters. Here we are mainly interested in strong couplings with with large superfluid gaps. Most remarkably, we find that for all of the above discussed topological phases are realized for varying values of μ/tx and ty/tx, see Fig. 2.

Majorana modes at edge dislocations

Associated with the topological index, we expect the appearance of Majorana modes at topological defects in the system. Here such topological defects can either be vortices or—as a distinct feature of the lattice setup—also lattice dislocations. The Majorana modes are most conveniently derived as zero-energy modes of the quadratic Hamiltonian

where the symmetry properties of the gap Δij are determined by mean-field theory. Then the spatial dependence of the gap allows to imprint vortices, while dislocations are directly implemented into the lattice structure. Generally, we expect the Majorana modes in the vortex core for Chern number , while the weak index gives rise to Majorana modes localized at lattice dislocations with Burgers vector ±ex,y. The latter can be easily understood in the limit ty=0, where the system reduces to coupled 1D wires: then, a pair of dislocations corresponds to the inclusion/removal of a 1D wire of finite length into the bulk 2D system, see Fig. 3a. This bulk superfluid induces a p-wave pairing order parameter onto this single chain realizing the ideal toy model of a single Majorana chain32; this behaviour is in analogy to the proposals for the realization of Majorana modes in solid-state systems8,9.

Figure 3: Braiding of dislocation based Majorana modes as touchstone of non-Abelian statistics.
figure 3

(a) Majorana modes at lattice dislocations: an edge dislocation pair with Burgers vector ±ey (black arrow) forming a single quantum wire (red line) immersed into the bulk superfluid. For a finite weak topological index such a setup generates two Majorana modes at the ends of the wire. The localized wave function of the two Majorana modes is determined by solving the quadratic theory (see equation (7)) in a parameter regime with (see Fig. 2b) on the shown lattice geometry by means of a Bogoliubov transformation. The radii of the blue circles are proportional to the square of the Majorana modes’ wave function. (b) Four Majorana modes are generated by the formation of two dislocation pairs, and then spatially separated: first along path 1 and subsequently along path 2. (c) The braiding operation is achieved by recombining the Majorana modes along path 3 and then path 4. (d) The braiding transforms the initially unoccupied state at each dislocation pair into an occupied fermion mode. The subsequent measurement of the unpaired fermions is a unique signature of the non-Abelian braiding statistics of the Majorana modes.

For the verification of the presence of Majorana modes, we diagonalize the Hamiltonian (7), which can be efficiently achieved numerically; an example is illustrated in Fig. 3a. In summary, we find for the phase Majorana modes in the core of vortices. Most remarkably, the system also exhibits Majorana modes at edge dislocations ex,y, but only for positive chemical potential μ>0 with a finite weak topological index νx=νy=1. Similarly, the cSF0:01 and SF0:01 only exhibit Majorana modes at edge dislocations with Burgers vector ±ey. Nevertheless, the two phases show distinct features due to their different symmetry classification: for the chiral phase cSF0:01 in symmetry class D, the topological index is a index. Therefore, a pair of double dislocations with Burgers vector ±2ex,y leads to a hybridization of the Majorana modes, and consequently no ground-state degeneracy. In turn, the time-reversal symmetric phase SF0:01 is in the symmetry class BDI, which gives rise to a topological index. Consequently, a pair of double dislocations essentially describes a two wire setup and provides four Majorana modes with a fourfold ground-state degeneracy. This behaviour is well-confirmed within the numerical solution of the Bogoliubov-de Gennes equations.


The described lattice setup allows us to provide a protocol for the observation of the non-Abelian braiding statistics of the Majorana modes residing at edge dislocations. In cold atomic gases, an edge dislocation corresponds to a vortex in the optical field generating the optical lattice44. Such edge dislocations are most conveniently generated in a setup with local site addressability34,35,45, where arbitrary shapes of the lattice can be achieved. In combination with a time-dependent modulation of the masks generating the lattice, a full spatial and temporal control on edge dislocations is foreseeable in the near future. Such a setup then offers the opportunity for the observation of the non-Abelian statistics of Majorana modes by braiding the dislocations. While the braiding of vortices in a superfluid has previously been predicted for the observation of the non-Abelian statistics46,47, such experiments suffer from the difficulty to control a collective degree of freedom such as the superfluid phase, and the problem to insert adiabatically vortices into a superfluid. Here edge dislocations in the lattice are much more favourable due to the precise and simple control on the lattice structures available in cold atomic gases. In addition, the lattice eliminates the localized subgap states which occur at energies of small fractions of the bulk gap in the vortices of continuum p-wave superfluids, and which may render braiding experiments difficult to realize in neutral superfluids48,49.

In the following, we present the protocol for measuring the non-Abelian statistics of the Majorana fermions, see Fig. 3b–d. It is important that all operations are performed adiabatically, that is, slower than the characteristic time scale given by the superfluid gap.

In a first step, we initialize the system by adiabatically creating two dislocation pairs. At each pair, we obtain a single fermionic mode described by the operators cr,b with a finite energy gap. This fermion mode is unoccupied as at low temperatures all fermions are Cooper paired. The next step separates the two dislocation pairs first along path 1 and then along path 2. This operation splits the fermionic modes into Majorana modes localized at the edge dislocations, and gives rise to a fourfold degenerate ground state of which two are accessible at fixed fermion number parity. However, adiabaticity of the process ensures a well-defined initial state with cr,b|g›=0.

Next, we perform the braiding by recombining the two dislocation pairs along path 3 and finally path 4. This process corresponds to moving the two Majorana modes around each other. According to the general non-Abelian braiding rules for Majorana modes50, this transforms the fermionic operators via ; here we drop a phase factor, which is irrelevant for the protocol. As a consequence, the initially unoccupied state becomes occupied by one fermion each, that is, . In a physical picture, the braiding operation takes one Cooper pair from the superfluid condensate and splits it into two fermions with one residing at each dislocation pair. It is the strength of the non-Abelian braiding statistics, that this characteristic signature is independent of the braiding path, as well as any dynamical phase picked up during the adiabatic motion. We tested numerically that the gap remains always on the order of the superfluid gap for the full braiding protocol.

To probe the system, one ramps the energy difference of the molecular state to the free fermionic states ω to negative values, which drives the system into the strong pairing phase with all paired fermions residing in the center of the plaquettes. This procedure is the analogue to the process of forming pairs via a Feshbach resonance36. Finally, a measurement of the fermionic density on the original lattice sites34 probes the unpaired fermions in the system. Here we expect one unpaired fermion at each dislocation pair. To test the protocol against induced noise, finite temperature or violation of adiabaticity, one can test the process against a background measurement with a reversed order of path 3 and 4. Since this process does not braid the two Majorana modes, no unpaired fermions should be present in an ideal experiment.

In summary, we have proposed an experimentally realistic setup for the realization of a p-wave superfluid supporting Majorana fermions at lattice dislocations in a 2D optical lattice. Furthermore, we have explained how this setup allows for an efficient braiding of the Majorana fermions and might thus pave the way towards the experimental demonstration of the anyonic nature of Majorana fermions.


Topological indices

The topological classification of quadratic fermionic theories is based on their membership in one of the 10 Altland–Zirnbauer symmetry classes41,42,43. Perturbations that neither violate these symmetries nor close the gap cannot alter the topological class of the theory. In particular, there is no necessity for translational symmetry, which, in fact, is one of the peculiarities of topological phases. Nevertheless, the only viable labelling scheme for such phases makes use of topological invariants that are defined as functionals of the momentum space representation of the theory under consideration. Hence the mathematical machinery enforces us to fall back to translationally invariant theories to obtain the topological invariants (‘labels’), which then characterize the topological phases even in the case of weak disorder.

The momentum space representation of our theory reads

and, for a finite excitation gap Eq≠0, the Hamiltonian can be parametrized by a (normalized) Bloch vector ,

where denotes the vector of Pauli matrices. The Bloch vector defines a continuous mapping n:T2S2 with from the first Brillouin zone T2 (the torus) to the Bloch sphere S2. The strong topological index is the integral of the Berry curvature over the Brillouin zone T2 and given by the first Chern number

It can be interpreted as the winding or Skyrmion number of the vector field as q wraps around the torus.

The weak topological indices are given by the Berry phase along paths through the high symmetry points (qx,qy)=(π,0), (π,π) for νx and (0,π), (π,π) for νy, respectively. They can be interpreted as winding numbers of about the origin, since the Bloch vector is constrained to a great circle on the paths through the high symmetry points. This winding number is easily calculated via

and analogously for νy. The strong and weak topological phases of our 2D theory are then completely classified by the triple ν:νxνy (ref. 33) which gives rise to our notation in Fig. 2.

Microscopic setup

The fermionic states described by the operators reside on the sites of the optical lattice and are in the lowest Bloch band. The design of the interaction requires the coupling of these states to different internal states trapped by an optical lattice with the minima in the center of the plaquettes. Such a setup is most conveniently achieved for cold atomic gases with a metastable 3P2 state such as 87Sr or 171Yb. Then, the metastable 3P2 states are trapped at the sites of the lattice, while the ground state 1S0 is trapped in the center of the plaquette for an optical lattice close to the anti-magic wavelength. Therefore, the setup requires only a single 2D optical lattice. The experiment maintains the population of fermionic atoms on the lattice sites |i› in a single hyperfine state. Consequently, light assisted two-particle losses from the metastable 3P2 are quenched due to their fermionic statistic.

Next, we focus on the state trapped in the center of the plaquette. We are interested in two different hyperfine states in the electronic ground state 1S0, which will be denoted by a spin index σ with σε{↓, ↑}, and a setup with suppressed tunnelling between different plaquettes. The lowest lying state at each plaquette p exhibits s-wave symmetry and will be denoted as |0, σp, while the first excited state |α, σp with αε{x,y} is twofold degenerate and exhibits a p-wave symmetry, see Fig. 4b.

Figure 4: Microscopic setup.
figure 4

(a) The lattice sites |i› are coupled to two different internal states trapped in the center of the plaquette. The first one |0, ↑›p exhibits an s-wave orbital symmetry, while the second one |α, ↓›p shows a p-wave symmetry and is twofold degenerate. (b) Single particle level structure with the relevant transitions (solid lines). The additional transitions (dashed lines) are required for the design of the desired coupling Hamiltonian. (c) Energy levels for the two-particle states with the two interfering paths: describes the state with two fermions on the lattice sites surrounding the plaquette, while describes the near resonant repulsively bound molecule with p-wave symmetry.

The coupling between the states on the lattice to the center of the plaquette is driven by two Raman transitions or alternatively by direct transitions. The first Raman transition with detuning δa couples to the state |0, ↑›p providing the Hamiltonian with , and the operator creating a fermion in the state |0, ↑›p. The coupling strength wa accounts for the Rabi frequency as well as the wave function overlap. Note that the form of the coupling is determined by the s-wave symmetry of the state |0, ↑›p. In analogy, the second Raman transition couples to the states |α, ↓›p with fermionic operators and the detuning δb. To simplify the discussion, we set δb=−δa and wa=wb. Then, the coupling Hamiltonian reduces to with . Note, the different couplings due to the orbital p-wave symmetry of the states |α, ↓›p.

The main idea for the design of the interaction is now the fact that the state with two fermions in the center of the plaquette exhibits a strong onsite interaction U due to the s-wave scattering between two different hyperfine states. Within the rotating frame its energy is given by ω=δa+δb+U=U, see Fig. 4c. This motivates the introduction of two bosonic molecular states and exhibiting orbital p-wave symmetry. For a choice of the detunings with , we can then adiabatically eliminate all states with a single fermion in the center of the plaquette and arrive at the effective coupling Hamiltonian

with . Note that we have omitted additional terms describing an induced hopping of the fermionic operator ci; these terms will be discussed below. The resonant coupling of the fermionic states ci to the p-wave molecules Xp and Yp residing in the center of the plaquette reduces to

This coupling term differs from the desired interaction in equation (2); the last two terms describe a second representation of the p-wave symmetry for the coupling. While this coupling Hamiltonian gives rise to interesting p-wave superfluids, it is desirable to suppress these additional coupling terms.

In the following, we present a scheme, which completely quenches these terms, while for an experimental realization it is sufficient to weakly suppress them. The scheme is achieved by an additional transition with opposite detunings but equal coupling strengths, where the phase is spatially varying. The main requirement on the phase is that the coupling to the state c1 exhibits the opposite sign than the coupling to c2, while c1 and c3 have the same sign. The desired behaviour is achieved employing the principles of ref. 51, by adding Raman lasers with a contribution of the wave vector within the plane of the optical lattice, that is, with k0 the wave vector of the square lattice potential. By contrast, the Raman lasers for transitions must be incident at a right angle to the system. Then, we obtain the additional coupling terms and . The full coupling Hamiltonian exhibits interference between the two independent excitation channels for the molecules, see Fig. 4c, and reduces to

which reveals the desired coupling in equation (2) with ω=U and . In addition, the induced hopping terms via the single excitation in the center of the plaquette reduces to an additional conventional hopping as in equation (1) with tx=ty=2|wa|2a. Its interference with the direct hopping allows us to tune the ratios g/U and t/U independently.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Bühler, A. et al. Majorana modes and p-wave superfluids for fermionic atoms in optical lattices. Nat. Commun. 5:4504 doi: 10.1038/ncomms5504 (2014).


  1. Moore, G. & Read, N. Nonabelions in the fractional quantum Hall effect. Nucl. Phys. B 360, 362–396 (1991).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kitaev, A. Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons. Ann. Phys. 303, 2–30 (2003).

    CAS  ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nayak, C., Simon, S. H., Stern, A., Freedman, M. H. & DasSarma, S. Non-Abelian anyons and topological quantum computation. Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1083–1159 (2008).

    CAS  ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Volovik, G. E. Exotic Properties of Superfluid 3He World Scientific, Singapore (1992).

  5. Ishida, K. et al. Spin-triplet superconductivity in Sr2RuO4 identified by 17O Knight shift. Nature 396, 658–660 (1998).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jiang, P. et al. Braiding of Abelian and Non-Abelian Anyons in the Fractional Quantum Hall Effect. Preprint at (2011).

  7. Willett, R. L., Nayak, C., Shtengel, K., Pfeiffer, L. N. & West, K. W. Magnetic-field-tuned aharonov-bohm oscillations and evidence for non-abelian anyons at ν=5/2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 186401 (2013).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sau, J. D., Lutchyn, R. M., Tewari, S. & DasSarma, S. Generic new platform for topological quantum computation using semiconductor heterostructures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 040502 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Alicea, J. Majorana fermions in a tunable semiconductor device. Phys. Rev. B 81, 125318 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Oreg, Y., Refael, G. & von Oppen, F. Helical liquids and majorana bound states in quantum wires. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 177002 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Beenakker, C. W. J. Search for majorana fermions in superconductors. Annu. Rev. Con. Mat. Phys. 4, 113 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mourik, V. et al. Signatures of majorana fermions in hybrid superconductor-semiconductor nanowire devices. Science 336, 1003–1007 (2012).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Das, A. et al. Zero-bias peaks and splitting in an Al-InAs nanowire topological superconductor as a signature of Majorana fermions. Nat. Phys. 8, 887–895 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gurarie, V. & Radzihovsky, L. Resonantly paired fermionic superfluids. Ann. Phys. 322, 2–119 (2007).

    CAS  ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang, J. et al. P-wave feshbach resonances of ultracold 6Li. Phys. Rev. A 70, 030702 (2004).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gaebler, J. P., Stewart, J. T., Bohn, J. L. & Jin, D. S. p-wave feshbach molecules. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 200403 (2007).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Levinsen, J., Cooper, N. R. & Gurarie, V. Stability of fermionic gases close to a p -wave Feshbach resonance. Phys. Rev. A 78, 063616 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jona-Lasinio, M., Pricoupenko, L. & Castin, Y. Three fully polarized fermions close to a p-wave Feshbach resonance. Phys. Rev. A 77, 043611 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Efremov, D. V. & Viverit, L. p-wave Cooper pairing of fermions in mixtures of dilute Fermi and Bose gases. Phys. Rev. B 65, 134519 (2002).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang, D. W., Lukin, M. & Demler, E. Engineering superfluidity in Bose-Fermi mixtures of ultracold atoms. Phys. Rev. A 72, 051604 (2005).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Massignan, P., Sanpera, A. & Lewenstein, M. Creating p-wave superfluids and topological excitations in optical lattices. Phys. Rev. A 81, 031607 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cooper, N. R. & Shlyapnikov, G. V. Stable topological superfluid phase of ultracold polar fermionic molecules. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 155302 (2009).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang, C., Tewari, S., Lutchyn, R. M. & Das Sarma, S. p x+ip y superfluid from s-wave interactions of fermionic cold atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 160401 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sato, M., Takahashi, Y. & Fujimoto, S. Non-abelian topological order in s-wave superfluids of ultracold fermionic atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 020401 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Williams, R. A. et al. Synthetic partial waves in ultracold atomic collisions. Science 335, 314–317 (2012).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Juliá-Díaz, B., Graß, T., Dutta, O., Chang, D. E. & Lewenstein, M. Engineering p-wave interactions in ultracold atoms using nanoplasmonic traps. Nat. Commun. 4, 2046 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Han, Y. J. et al. Stabilization of the p-wave superfluid state in an optical lattice. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 070404 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bardyn, C.-E. et al. Majorana modes in driven-dissipative atomic superfluids with a zero chern number. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 130402 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Büchler, H. P., Hermele, M., Huber, S. D., Fisher, M. P. A. & Zoller, P. Atomic quantum simulator for lattice gauge theories and ring exchange models. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 040402 (2005).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kraus, C. V., Dalmonte, M., Baranov, M. A., Läuchli, A. M. & Zoller, P. Majorana edge states in atomic wires coupled by pair hopping. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 173004 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Liu, B., Li, X., Wu, B. & Liu, W. V. p-wave chiral superfluidity from an s-wave interacting atomic Fermi gas. Preprint at (2014).

  32. Kitaev, A. Y. Unpaired Majorana fermions in quantum wires. Physics-Uspekhi 44, 131–136 (2001).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Asahi, D. & Nagaosa, N. Topological indices, defects, and Majorana fermions in chiral superconductors. Phys. Rev. B 86, 100504 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Bakr, W. S., Gillen, J. I., Peng, A., Folling, S. & Greiner, M. A quantum gas microscope for detecting single atoms in a Hubbard-regime optical lattice. Nature 462, 74–77 (2009).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sherson, J. F. et al. Single-atom-resolved fluorescence imaging of an atomic Mott insulator. Nature 467, 68–72 (2010).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Winkler, K. et al. Repulsively bound atom pairs in an optical lattice. Nature 441, 853–856 (2006).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Chin, C., Grimm, R., Julienne, P. & Tiesinga, E. Feshbach resonances in ultracold gases. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1225–1286 (2010).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Read, N. & Green, D. Paired states of fermions in two dimensions with breaking of parity and time-reversal symmetries and the fractional quantum Hall effect. Phys. Rev. B 61, 10267–10297 (2000).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Fu, L., Kane, C. & Mele, E. Topological insulators in three dimensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 106803 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Fu, L. & Kane, C. Topological insulators with inversion symmetry. Phys. Rev. B 76, 045302 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Altland, A. & Zirnbauer, M. R. Nonstandard symmetry classes in mesoscopic normal-superconducting hybrid structures. Phys. Rev. B 55, 1142–1161 (1997).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Schnyder, A., Ryu, S., Furusaki, A. & Ludwig, A. Classification of topological insulators and superconductors in three spatial dimensions. Phys. Rev. B 78, 195125 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Kitaev, A., Lebedev, V. & Feigelman, M. Periodic table for topological insulators and superconductors. AIP Conf. Proc. 22, 22–30 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Schonbrun, E. & Piestun, R. Optical vortices for localized optical lattice site manipulation. Opt. Eng. 45, 028001 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Nogrette, F. et al. Single-atom trapping in holographic 2D arrays of microtraps with arbitrary geometries. Phys. Rev. X 4, 021034 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Tewari, S., Das Sarma, S., Nayak, C., Zhang, C. & Zoller, P. Quantum computation using vortices and majorana zero modes of a p x+ip y superfluid of fermionic cold atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 010506 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Zhu, S.-L., Shao, L.-B., Wang, Z. D. & Duan, L.-M. Probing non-abelian statistics of majorana fermions in ultracold atomic superfluid. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 100404 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Akhmerov, A. R. Topological quantum computation away from the ground state using Majorana fermions. Phys. Rev. B 82, 020509(R) (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Möller, G., Cooper, N. R. & Gurarie, V. Structure and consequences of vortex-core states in p-wave superfluids. Phys. Rev. B 83, 014513 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Kitaev, A. Anyons in an exactly solved model and beyond. Ann. Phys. 321, 2–111 (2006).

    CAS  ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Jaksch, D. & Zoller, P. Creation of effective magnetic fields in optical lattices: the Hofstadter butterfly for cold neutral atoms. New J. Phys. 5, 56 (2003).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We acknowledge support by the Center for Integrated Quantum Science and Technology (IQST) and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) within SFB TRR 21, the Leverhulme Trust (ECF-2011-565), the Newton Trust of the University of Cambridge, the Royal Society (UF120157), SFB FoQus (FWF Project No. F4006-N16), the ERC Synergy Grant UQUAM, SIQS and Swiss National Science Foundation. G.M., S.D.H., C.V.K. and H.P.B. thank the Institut d'Etudes Scientifiques Cargèse and CECAM for their hospitality.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



H.P.B., S.D.H., G.M. and C.V.K. conceived the idea of the project. A.B. and N.L. performed the analytical and the numerical calculation, including the derivation of the phase diagram and the verification of Majorana modes in the system. C.V.K. performed DMRG calculations on a three wire setup to test the existence of Majorana modes beyond mean-field approximation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H.P. Büchler.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bühler, A., Lang, N., Kraus, C. et al. Majorana modes and p-wave superfluids for fermionic atoms in optical lattices. Nat Commun 5, 4504 (2014).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing