Abstract
Quantum point contacts exhibit mysterious conductance anomalies in addition to wellknown conductance plateaus at multiples of 2e^{2}/h. These 0.7 and zerobias anomalies have been intensively studied, but their microscopic origin in terms of manybody effects is still highly debated. Here we use the charged tip of a scanning gate microscope to tune in situ the electrostatic potential of the point contact. While sweeping the tip distance, we observe repetitive splittings of the zerobias anomaly, correlated with simultaneous appearances of the 0.7 anomaly. We interpret this behaviour in terms of alternating equilibrium and nonequilibrium Kondo screenings of different spin states localized in the channel. These alternating Kondo effects point towards the presence of a Wigner crystal containing several charges with different parities. Indeed, simulations show that the electron density in the channel is low enough to reach onedimensional Wigner crystallization over a size controlled by the tip position.
Introduction
Quantum point contacts (QPCs)^{1} are among the simplest quantum devices made out of a twodimensional electron gas (2DEG). Applying a negative voltage on a splitgate creates a quasionedimensional (1D) channel connected to large 2D reservoirs. This narrow channel behaves as an electron waveguide and transmits a finite number of modes, each of them carrying one quantum of conductance G_{0}=2e^{2}/h (e is the electron charge and h the Planck constant). As a result, the conductance versus gate voltage curve shows a series of quantized plateaus with transitions, which are well reproduced by a singleparticle model^{2}.
However, since the early days of QPCs, a shoulderlike feature is commonly observed^{3} at a conductance around 0.7 G_{0}, which cannot be explained by singleparticle theories. With lowering temperature, this ‘0.7 anomaly’ rises to reach the first plateau, and a zerobias peak called ‘zerobias anomaly’ (ZBA) emerges in the nonlinear differential conductance^{4}. These anomalies have been extensively studied through transport experiments^{3,4,5,6,7}, revealing the complexity of the underlying phenomena. Different theoretical models have been proposed^{8,9,10,11,12,13}, but no consensus could be reached so far on their interpretation^{14}.
Recently, an experiment using several gates to vary the channel length^{15} revealed the possible existence of several emergent localized states responsible for the conductance anomalies. At the same time, a different theoretical model was proposed^{16}, explaining the anomalies without invoking localized states in the channel. As stressed in ref. 17, investigating these anomalies using scanning probe techniques could make it possible to check the existence of spontaneously localized states and discriminate between these two proposals: this is the aim of the present letter.
Here we perform scanning gate microscopy (SGM)^{18}, in which a negatively charged tip is scanned above the sample surface and modifies the electrostatic potential in the 2DEG. This local potential change induces electron backscattering towards the QPC, which can be used to image singleparticle phenomena such as wavefunction quantization in the channel^{19}, branched flow in the disorder potential^{20}, interference patterns induced by the tip^{21,22,23}, or to investigate electron–electron interactions inside^{24} or outside^{25} the QPC. This movable gate can also be used to tune in situ the saddle potential of the QPC, in a more flexible and less invasive way than fixed surface gates, and probe intrinsic properties of the QPC such as the 0.7 anomaly^{26,27}.
Here we show that approaching the tip towards the QPC produces an oscillatory splitting of the ZBA, correlated with simultaneous appearances of the 0.7 anomaly, thereby confirming that both features share a common origin^{4,15}. We interpret these observations as the signature of a small onedimensional Wigner crystal^{28,29,30} forming in the channel^{31} (a quantum chain of charges localized by Coulomb interactions in absence of disorder). The number of charges in this manybody correlated state is tuned by changing the tip position, leading alternatively to a single or a twoimpurity Kondo effect (screening of a localized spin by conducting electrons), with a conductance peak either at zero, or at finite bias, depending on the charge parity.
Our observations therefore strongly support the existence of emergent localized states, as suggested in ref. 15 where the number of localized charges is controlled by changing the effective channel length. Here we show that a similar effect is observed when changing the distance of an additional gate placed around the QPC. To understand this new result, we perform classical electrostatic simulations and evaluate the size of the region where electrons should form a 1D Wigner crystal, thanks to the critically low electron density. We show that the calculated size of this small crystal is in good agreement with the observed change in the number of localized charges, thereby revealing that Wigner crystallization is, to our opinion, the correct way to understand this spontaneous localization.
Results
Transport measurements
The QPC (see Methods and Fig. 1a) is cooled down to a temperature of 20 mK in a cryogenic scanning probe microscope^{32}. In the absence of the tip (moved several microns away), the linear conductance shows the usual staircase behaviour versus gate voltage (Fig. 1b). The shoulder below the first quantized plateau is the puzzling 0.7 anomaly. The sourcedrain bias spectroscopy (Fig. 1c) shows that this shoulder evolves to a clear plateau at 0.85 G_{0} at finite bias^{5,33,34}. The narrow peak around zero bias is the ZBA and disappears above 1 K (Supplementary Fig. 1). Its width of 200 μeV is much smaller than the 1D subband spacing of 4.5 meV (Fig. 1d). Above 0.7 G_{0}, the ZBA splits into finitebias peaks^{15,35} centred at ±250 μV. We show in the following that the presence of the 0.7 anomaly is related to this splitting of the ZBA.
Scanning gate microscopy
When the tip is scanned near the QPC and polarized such as to deplete locally the 2DEG (see Methods), we observe two distinct phenomena. On the first conductance plateau (Fig. 2b), SGM images reveal the electron flow coming out of the QPC, with fringes spaced by half the Fermi wavelength, as already observed by several groups^{20,22,23}. The fringes result from interferences of electrons backscattered by the depleted region below the tip and reflected by impurities^{20,22} in the 2DEG or directly by the gates^{21,36}.
Below the first plateau (Fig. 2a), SGM maps reveal a novel set of concentric rings centred on the QPC, with a spacing increasing with tip distance (see also Supplementary Fig. 2). As opposed to the previous oneparticle interference fringes, these new rings are not linked to the electron flow (black region in Fig. 2b) but extend rather isotropically around the QPC, not only in the horizontal plane but in all three directions of space. This is revealed by scanning the tip in a vertical plane (Fig. 2c), unveiling half spheres centred on the QPC (purple line 1). This behaviour contrasts with that of interference fringes (green line 2) that quickly disappear when the tip is scanned >50 nm above the surface (see also Supplementary Fig. 3). Interferences indeed require electrons at the Fermi level to be backscattered by a depleted region below the tip, a situation which is only obtained for the tip close enough to the 2DEG (and at low enough temperature to avoid thermal averaging of the interferences). We therefore conclude that the new rings are not interferences but result from a direct tuning of the electrostatic potential in the QPC. The larger ring spacing at larger distances results from the smaller potential changes induced by the tip.
Conductance anomalies
To demonstrate that these rings correspond to modulations of the conductance anomalies, the tip is scanned along a single line in a region with almost no interference (line 3 in Fig. 3a) and the QPC parameters (gate and bias voltages) are varied. Figure 3b shows that the ringrelated conductance oscillations are only visible for gate voltages in the transition below the first plateau, just where the ZBA and 0.7 anomaly are observed. Figure 3c shows how the conductance oscillations evolve when the average conductance goes from 0 to G_{0} while changing the gate voltage. The oscillations are clearly visible between 0.4 and 0.8 G_{0}. They are blurred when approaching G_{0} because some interference fringes come into play. The increasing distance between conductance extrema (labelled A to D for maxima and A’ to D’ for minima) is consistent with an oscillatory phenomenon in the QPC, controlled by the decreasing electrostatic coupling to the tip. Plotting the conductance versus gate voltage (Fig. 3d) reveals the oscillatory behaviour of the 0.7 anomaly. The amplitude of this modulation can be read from Fig. 3e, where curves at positions X and X′ are compared twobytwo (curves are shifted horizontally to compensate for the drift of the pinchoff voltage while approaching the tip). Curves at positions A to D are smooth with no shoulder, that is, no anomaly, whereas curves at positions A′ to D′ present a reduced conductance above 0.5 G_{0}, that is, the 0.7 anomaly. The concentric rings observed in SGM images (Fig. 2a) therefore correspond to an alternating modulation of the 0.7 anomaly when the tip approaches the QPC.
We now analyse the behaviour of the ZBA when the 0.7 anomaly repeatedly appears and disappears, and show that both anomalies are linked. Figure 4a shows the differential conductance versus sourcedrain bias for different tip positions (same scan line as in Fig. 3a). Curves at positions A to D have a peak centred at zero bias (ZBA), whereas curves at positions A′ to D′ have a dip at zero bias and local maxima at ±250 μV bias (splitting of the ZBA), on top of the same Vshaped background. Scanning the SGM tip therefore produces a repetitive splitting of the ZBA, which draws a checkerboard pattern in a colour plot of the spectroscopy versus tip position (Fig. 4b). Note that the spontaneous splitting of the ZBA observed without the tip (Fig. 1c) also shows peaks at ±250 μV and probably has the same origin.
Considering the regularity of the concentric rings in Fig. 2a, this oscillatory behaviour of the 0.7 and ZBAs would be observed for any scanning line in a large range of angles (see Supplementary Fig. 4 and Supplementary Note 1). As a consequence, rings with conductance maxima correspond to a simple staircase in the linear conductance and a ZBA in the nonlinear spectroscopy, whereas rings with conductance minima correspond to a 0.7 anomaly and a splitting of the ZBA. This result shows that the ZBA suppresses the 0.7 anomaly at low temperature^{4} only if the ZBA is not split into finitebias peaks.
Discussion
First, we would like to stress again that these new conductance oscillations cannot be explained by interference effects in the 2DEG. One argument already given above is that interferences require backscattering with a tip close to the surface, whereas the new rings are observed up to large tip heights (Fig. 2c). A second argument is that interference fringes would have an increasing spacing for short tip distances because the density is reduced close to the QPC and the electron wavelength is larger, but the opposite behaviour is observed.
We now discuss a possible singleparticle effect inside the QPC that, at first sight, could give similar conductance oscillations. In case of a nonadiabatic transmission, wave functions are scattered by the QPC potential barrier and transmission resonances appear when the barrier length is equal to an integer number of half the longitudinal wavelength. If the effect of the tip is to change the channel length, such resonances could give conductance oscillations versus tip distance. However, this singleparticle mechanism cannot explain the repetitive splittings of the ZBA, which are simultaneous with the observed conductance oscillations, and we therefore need another explanation.
The ZBA in QPCs has been shown to scale with temperature and magnetic field similar to the Kondo effect in quantum dots^{4}. This effect corresponds to the screening of a single degenerate level by a continuum of states, and therefore indicates the presence of a localized spin in the QPC channel^{11}. Splittings of the ZBA have been observed recently in lengthtunable QPCs^{15} and interpreted as a twoimpurity Kondo effect^{37,38}, involving nonequilibrium Kondo screening^{39,40}, as commonly observed in quantum dots with even numbers of electrons^{41}, coupled quantum dots^{42} and molecular junctions^{43}.
We now consider different scenarios to explain the presence of such localized states in our system. In a recent work on QPCs made out of a 2D hole gas, a spontaneous splitting of the ZBA as the QPC opens has been reported^{35}. This effect was attributed to a charge impurity forming a potential well close to the channel, containing one or two charges, leading to different types of Kondo screening. In our case, the spontaneous splitting of the ZBA as the QPC opens (Fig. 1c) could be explained by this effect. However, the fact that approaching the tip towards the QPC results in four successive splittings of the ZBA indicates that this impurity should contain at least eight charges, which is unlikely for a single impurity. Nevertheless, one could imagine that a shallow quantum dot has formed in the QPC due to potential fluctuations induced by residual disorder^{44} and giving Coulomb blockade oscillations as often observed in long 1D wires^{45}. The major argument to exclude this scenario is that the splitgate has a larger capacitive coupling to the channel than the tip has (that is, a larger leverarm parameter), so the splitgate should induce more charging events than the tip, but we observe the opposite: approaching the tip by 600 nm produces four successive splittings of the ZBA and sweeping the gate voltage produces only one splitting. It can therefore not be Coulomb blockade in a disorderinduced quantum dot.
The only remaining possibility to explain the presence of localized states in the channel is a spontaneous electron localization, which is not induced by potential barriers but instead by electron–electron interactions. Indeed, a large number of theoretical and numerical investigations show that interactions can localize a finite number of electrons in the channel^{12,13,46,47}. On the first conductance plateau and below, transport can be considered as 1D, and the electron density is so low that the Coulomb repulsion overcomes the kinetic energy. When the 1D density n_{1D} fulfills the criterion n_{1D} × a_{B}<1, where a_{B} is the effective Bohr radius (10 nm in GaAs), electrons are expected to spontaneously order in a crystal, with an interparticle distance minimizing Coulomb repulsion^{48}. This manybody state, known as a Wigner crystal^{28,29}, has been suggested to be responsible for the 0.7 anomaly in QPCs^{12}. When the electron density in the channel is decreased below the critical value, the density modulations evolve continuously from the λ_{F}/2 periodicity of Friedel oscillations to the λ_{F}/4 periodicity of the Wigner crystal^{49}. Quantum Monte Carlo simulations have also shown that electrons in the crystallized region can be relatively decoupled from the highdensity reservoirs and present an antiferromagnetic coupling J between adjacent spins^{47}. In contrast to the case of quantum dots with real tunnel barriers, electron localization in a QPC is not straightforward and results from emergent barriers in the selfconsistent potential. On the other hand, the Kondo effect requires a relatively open system with a good coupling to the reservoirs, and this makes the QPC a suitable platform to observe Kondo phenomena on an interactioninduced localized state, as shown recently in lengthtunable QPCs^{15}.
This last scenario being the most realistic one in our case, we therefore interpret the four observed oscillations as a signature of eight successive states of a small nonuniform 1D Wigner crystal with an alternating odd and even number of localized charges. Situations with an odd number of electrons in a spin S=1/2 ground state show a ZBA due to Kondo screening of nonzero spin states. Situations with an even number of electrons in a spin singlet S=0 ground state show a splitting of the ZBA due to nonequilibrium Kondo screening^{39,40} of the spin triplet S=1 excited state with peaks at a finite bias eV=J (Fig. 4c). The four oscillations, suggestive of eight successive states, reveal that a large number of electrons can spontaneously localize in the channel of a QPC, as shown in Fig. 4d. Observing Kondo screening on a system with many localized charges is not so surprising if we compare with quantum dots where the Kondo effect is observed up to large numbers of electrons^{50}. Nevertheless, the particular case of a 1D chain of localized charges in the Kondo regime still requires theoretical investigations.
This analysis is consistent with the interpretation given in ref. 15 for similar observations using a QPC with six surface gates to tune the channel length. Our SGM experiment brings additional information on this effect, as scanning the tip around the QPC, laterally or vertically, changes the shape, extension and symmetry of the channel potential. The circular and almost isotropic rings in Fig. 2c show that the localized states survive to all these potential deformations. The regularity of the successive rings also suggests that this localization occurs rather independently of disorder, although possible crystal pinning effects should be investigated in the future.
In ref. 15, the parameter controlling the number of localized states is the effective length of the channel, defined in ref. 51 and computed using an analytical approach assuming a fixed zero potential at the surface^{52}. This method is not suitable to model our SGM experiment, as the tip is situated above the surface. To evaluate the potential landscape in the presence of the tip, we perform 3D classical electrostatic simulations in the Thomas–Fermi approximation (see Methods and Supplementary Note 2) and compute selfconsistently the local potential V(x,y) in the 2DEG and the local 2D electronic density n_{2D}(x,y) (Fig. 5a). In this way, the tipinduced potential is correctly calculated, with the screening effects from the 2DEG and the metallic gates taken into account. We obtain a good agreement between calculated and experimental values regarding the gate voltage required to close the QPC, the tip voltage to reach depletion in the 2DEG and the crosstalk between the tip position and the QPC opening. The effective channel length used in ref. 15 was calculated in ref. 51, using the unscreened gate potential. This length cannot be calculated here from our selfconsistent potential, because screening effects induce nonparabolic transverse confinement potentials.
We propose instead that the parameter controlling the number of localized charges is the size of the region where the 1D Wigner crystallization should occur. This interactioninduced spontaneous ordering is often discussed in terms of the Wigner–Seitz radius r_{s}=1/(2n_{1D}a_{B}), representing the ratio of the Coulomb repulsion to the kinetic energy. A recent numerical investigation of the 1D Wigner crystallization shows that the critical parameter varies between 0.5 and 2, depending on the strength of the transverse confinement potential^{48}. To evaluate the size of the region where r_{s} is larger than a given threshold, we calculate the 1D electron density by integration of the 2D electron density in the transverse direction (Fig. 5b,c). As an example, we choose a critical value corresponding to a critical density , and evaluate the size L_{crystal} where the density is lower than . This size is found to vary from 210 to 290 nm when the tip is approached by 600 nm towards the QPC, which shows that the tip can strongly affect the size of the lowdensity region, and hence the number of localized charges. The tip positions leading to the same L_{crystal} form rings centred on the QPC, both for horizontal and vertical scanning planes (Fig. 5d,e), in the same way as the conductance oscillations observed in the SGM experiment (Fig. 2c).
Our classical simulation holds only for an estimate of the size L_{crystal}, but cannot be used to calculate the number of localized charges, as quantum mechanics dominates at such a low density. Note that charges in this crystal are not expected to be uniformly spaced, because the potential of a QPC shows a strong curvature. This nonuniform situation would require an extension of the concept of Wigner crystal, which is usually studied in a flat potential landscape. A rather crude approach to evaluate how many charges can be added by approaching the tip is to suppose that one charge is added to the crystal each time the region is enlarged by (~14 nm for ). With this assumption, approximately five charges can be added to the crystal when the tip is approached close to the QPC (Fig. 5d). This value is qualitatively consistent with the four oscillations observed in the experiment, and interpreted as the addition of eight charges. Simulations also show that the number of charges can be modified simply by changing the splitgate voltage (see Supplementary Fig. 5). This could explain the ZBA splitting observed above 0.7 G_{0} in absence of the tip (Fig. 1c).
Our assumption that electrons form a 1D system in the lowdensity region is justified a posteriori by the fact that only the first and second transverse modes are occupied over the length L_{crystal}. The presence of the second mode at the extremities of this region indicates that the system is not strictly 1D, but theory still predicts the formation of a Wigner crystal in the second subband of quasi1D wires, forming a zigzag chain^{53}, as possibly observed in experiments^{31,54}. Interestingly, the simulations show that a small crystallized region survives when the second mode reaches the central part of the channel, which could explain the 0.7 analogues often observed between the first and second conductance plateaus.
In summary, we observe a periodic modulation of the conductance anomalies in a QPC at very low temperature while tuning continuously the potential with the polarized tip of a SGM. We explain this experimental observation by the formation of an interactioninduced localized state in the QPC channel, which gives rise to a single or twoimpurity Kondo effect depending on the odd or even number of localized charges, respectively. Indeed, electrostatic simulations show that the electron density in the channel is low enough to result in a spontaneous 1D Wigner crystallization. Our study gives new information on QPC conductance anomalies, which should guide future theoretical works, and will open the way to further experimental investigations involving fine tuning of the QPC potential using various methods.
Methods
Sample and measurement
The QPC is designed on a GaAs/AlGaAs heterostructure hosting a 2DEG 105 nm below the surface with 2.5 × 10^{11} cm^{−2} electron density and 1.0 × 10^{6} cm^{2} V^{−1} s^{−1} electron mobility. A Ti/Au splitgate is defined by ebeam lithography on a mesa with four ohmic contacts and forms a 270nmlong and 300nmwide opening. The device is fixed to the mixing chamber of a dilution fridge, in front of a cryogenic scanning probe microscope^{32,55,56}. The QPC is cooled down to a base temperature of 20 mK at zero gate voltage. The fourprobe differential conductance G=dI/dV_{bias} is measured by a standard lockin technique, using a 10μV AC excitation at a frequency of 123 Hz. A series resistance of 600 Ω is subtracted from all data to have the conductance of the first plateau at 2e^{2}/h. As the temperature evolution of the zerobias peak does not saturate below 90 mK, the temperature of electrons in the QPC is probably below this value.
Scanning gate microscopy
The tip of a commercial platinumcoated cantilever is fixed on a quartz tuning fork, which is mounted on the microscope actuators. The position of the QPC is determined by SGM as the tip position corresponding to the maximum change in conductance while scanning at large tipsurface distance. Next, the tip is lowered to a few tens of nanometres above the surface and scanned at fixed height on a single side of the 200nmthick splitgate in the scanning area shown in Fig. 1a. All the SGM results reported here are obtained for a tip voltage of −6 V and a tiptosurface height of 40 nm (except for vertical scans in Fig. 2c starting at 30 nm). Note that the dilution fridge stays at its base temperature of 20 mK during tip scanning.
Electrostatic simulations
Classical electrostatic simulations are performed with the Comsol software. We model the system in three dimensions as follows. The 2DEG plane is located 105 nm below the surface according to our heterostructure. The region between the 2DEG and the surface is filled with the GaAs dielectric constant ε_{r}=12.9. The initial electron density in the 2DEG is set at 2.5 × 10^{11} e^{−} cm^{−2} by the addition of a uniform plane of positive charges modelling ionized dopants (in the same plane as the 2DEG for better computation stability). The metallic gates are 120 nm thick and define a 270nmwide and 300nmlong constriction, corresponding to our sample geometry. The tip is modelled by a cone with a 30° full angle and a 30nm curvature radius at the apex. The tip voltage is fixed at −6 V as in the experiment. For a given choice of gate voltage and tip position, the local potential and density are computed selfconsistently by successive iterations. These calculations therefore include screening effects in the 2DEG.
Additional information
How to cite this article: Brun, B. et al. Wigner and Kondo physics in quantum point contacts revealed by scanning gate microscopy. Nat. Commun. 5:4290 doi: 10.1038/ncomms5290 (2014).
References
 1.
van Wees, B. J. et al. Quantized conductance of point contacts in a twodimensional electron gas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 848 (1988).
 2.
Büttiker, M. Quantized transmission of a saddle point constriction. Phys. Rev. B 41, 7906 (1990).
 3.
Thomas, K. J. et al. Possible spin polarization in a onedimensional electron gas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1 (1996).
 4.
Cronenwett, S. M. et al. Lowtemperature fate of the 0.7 structure in a point contact: a Kondolike correlated state in an open system. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 226805 (2002).
 5.
Kristensen, A. et al. Bias and temperature dependence of the 0.7 conductance anomaly in quantum point contacts. Phys. Rev. B 62, 16 (2000).
 6.
Reilly, D. J. et al. Densitydependent spin polarization in ultralowdisorder quantum wires. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 246801 (2002).
 7.
Hew, W. K. et al. Spinincoherent transport in quantum wires. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 036801 (2008).
 8.
Wang, C.K. & Berggren, K.F. Local spin polarization in ballistic quantum point contacts. Phys. Rev. B 57, 4552 (1998).
 9.
Spivak, B. & Zhou, F. Ferromagnetic correlations in quasionedimensional conducting channels. Phys. Rev. B 61, 16730 (2000).
 10.
Sushkov, O. P. Conductance anomalies in a onedimensional quantum contact. Phys. Rev. B 64, 155319 (2001).
 11.
Meir, Y., Hirose, K. & Wingreen, N. S. Kondo model for the 0.7 anomaly in transport through a quantum point contact. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 196802 (2002).
 12.
Matveev, K. A. Conductance of a quantum wire in the Wignercrystal regime. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 106801 (2004).
 13.
Rejec, T. & Meir, Y. Magnetic impurity formation in quantum point contacts. Nature 442, 900 (2006).
 14.
Micolich, A. P. What lurks below the last plateau: experimental studies of the 0.7 × 2e^{2}/h conductance anomaly in onedimensional systems. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 23, 443201 (2011).
 15.
Iqbal, M. J. et al. Odd and even Kondo effects from emergent localisation in quantum point contacts. Nature 501, 79–83 (2013).
 16.
Bauer, F. et al. Microscopic origin of the 0.7anomaly in quantum point contacts. Nature 501, 73–78 (2013).
 17.
Micolich, A. Quantum point contacts: Double or nothing? Nat. Phys. 9, 530–531 (2013).
 18.
Eriksson, M. A. et al. Cryogenic scanning probe characterization of semiconductor nanostructures. Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 671 (1996).
 19.
Topinka, M. A. et al. Imaging coherent electron flow from a quantum point contact. Science 289, 2323 (2000).
 20.
Topinka, M. A. et al. Coherent branched flow in a twodimensional electron gas. Nature 410, 183 (2001).
 21.
LeRoy, B. J. et al. Imaging electron interferometer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 126801 (2005).
 22.
Jura, M. P. et al. Unexpected features of branched flow through highmobility twodimensional electron gases. Nat. Phys. 3, 841 (2007).
 23.
Kozikov, A. A. et al. Interference of electrons in backscattering through a quantum point contact. New J. Phys. 15, 013056 (2013).
 24.
Freyn, A. et al. Scanning gate microscopy of a nanostructure where electrons interact. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 226802 (2008).
 25.
Jura, M. P. et al. Spatially probed electronelectron scattering in a twodimensional electron gas. Phys. Rev. B 82, 155328 (2010).
 26.
Crook, R. et al. Conductance quantization at a halfinteger plateau in a symmetric GaAs quantum wire. Science 312, 1359 (2006).
 27.
Iagallo, A. et al. Scanning gate imaging of quantum point contacts and the origin of the 0.7 anomaly. Preprint at: http://arXiv:1311.6303v1 (2013).
 28.
Wigner, E. On the interaction of electrons in metals. Phys. Rev. 46, 1002 (1934).
 29.
Schulz, H. J. Wigner crystal in one dimension. Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1864 (1993).
 30.
Deshpande, V. V. & Bockrath, M. The onedimensional Wigner crystal in carbon nanotubes. Nat. Phys. 4, 314 (2008).
 31.
Hew, W. K. Incipient formation of an electron lattice in a weakly confined quantum wire. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 056804 (2009).
 32.
Hackens, B. et al. Imaging Coulomb islands in a quantum Hall interferometer. Nat. Commun. 1, 39 (2010).
 33.
Patel, N. K. et al. Evolution of half plateaus as a function of electric field in a ballistic quasionedimensional constriction. Phys. Rev. B 44, 13549 (1991).
 34.
Thomas, K. J. et al. Interaction effects in a onedimensional constriction. Phys. Rev. B 58, 4846 (1998).
 35.
Komijani, Y. et al. Origins of conductance anomalies in a ptype GaAs quantum point contact. Phys. Rev. B 87, 245406 (2013).
 36.
Jura, M. P. et al. Electron interferometer formed with a scanning probe tip and quantum point contact. Phys. Rev. B 80, 041303(R) (2009).
 37.
Georges, A. & Meir, Y. Electronic correlations in transport through coupled quantum dots. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 17 (1999).
 38.
Aguado, R. & Langreth, D. C. Outofequilibrium Kondo effect in double quantum dots. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1946 (2000).
 39.
Lopez, R., Aguado, R. & Platero, G. Nonequilibrium transport through double quantum dots: Kondo effect versus antiferromagnetic coupling. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 136802 (2002).
 40.
Kiselev, M. N., Kikoin, K. & Molenkamp, L. W. Resonance Kondo tunneling through a double quantum dot at finite bias. Phys. Rev. B 68, 155323 (2003).
 41.
Sasaki, S. et al. Kondo effect in an integerspin quantum dot. Nature 405, 764 (2000).
 42.
Jeong, H., Chang, A. M. & Melloch, M. R. The Kondo effect in an artificial quantum dot molecule. Science 293, 2221 (2001).
 43.
Roch, N., Florens, S., Bouchiat, V., Wernsdorfer, W. & Balestro, F. Quantum phase transition in a singlemolecule quantum dot. Nature 453, 633 (2008).
 44.
Nixon, J. A., Davies, J. H. & Baranger, H. U. Breakdown of quantized conductance in point contacts calculated using realistic potentials. Phys. Rev. B 43, 12638 (1991).
 45.
Staring, A. A. M., van Houten, H., Beenakker, C. W. J. & Foxon, C. T. Coulombblockade oscillations in disordered quantum wires. Phys. Rev. B 45, 9222 (1992).
 46.
Sushkov, O. P. Restricted and unrestricted HartreeFock calculations of conductance for a quantum point contact. Phys. Rev. B 67, 195318 (2003).
 47.
Guçlu, A. D., Umrigar, C. J., Jiang, H. & Baranger, H. U. Localization in an inhomogeneous quantum wire. Phys. Rev. B 80, 201302(R) (2009).
 48.
Shulenburger, L., Casula, M., Senatore, G. & Martin, R. M. Correlation effects in quasionedimensional quantum wires. Phys. Rev. B 78, 165303 (2008).
 49.
Söffing, S. A. et al. Wigner crystal versus Friedel oscillations in the onedimensional Hubbard model. Phys. Rev. B 79, 195114 (2009).
 50.
GoldhaberGordon, D. et al. Kondo effect in a singleelectron transistor. Nature 391, 156 (1998).
 51.
Iqbal, M. J., de Jong, J. P., Reuter, D., Wieck, A. D. & van der Wal, C. H. Splitgate quantum point contacts with tunable channel length. J. Appl. Phys. 113, 024507 (2013).
 52.
Davies, J. H., Larkin, I. A. & Sukhorukov, E. V. Modeling the patterned two dimensional electron gas: electrostatics. J. Appl. Phys. 77, 4504 (1995).
 53.
Meyer, J. S., Matveev, K. A. & Larkin, A. I. Transition from a onedimensional to a quasionedimensional state in interacting quantum wires. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 126404 (2007).
 54.
Smith, L. W. et al. Row coupling in an interacting quasionedimensional quantum wire investigated using transport measurements. Phys. Rev. B 80, 041306(R) (2009).
 55.
Martins, F. et al. Coherent tunneling accross a quantum point contact in the quantum Hall regime. Sci. Rep. 3, 1416 (2013).
 56.
Martins, F. et al. Scanning gate spectroscopy of transport across a quantum Hall nanoisland. New J. Phys. 15, 013049 (2013).
Acknowledgements
We thank H. Baranger, J. Meyer, X. Waintal, D. Weinmann, J.L. Pichard and S. Florens for discussions. This work was supported by the French Agence Nationale de la Recherche (‘ITEMexp’ project), by FRFC grant number 2.4503.12, and by FRSFNRS grants numbers 1.5.044.07.F and J.0067.13. F.M. and B.H. acknowledge support from the Belgian FRSFNRS, S.F. received support from the FSR at UCL and V.B. acknowledges the award of a ‘chair d’excellence’ by the Nanosciences foundation in Grenoble.
Author information
Affiliations
University Grenoble Alpes, F38000 Grenoble, France
 B. Brun
 , G. Bachelier
 , S. Huant
 , V. Bayot
 , M. Sanquer
 & H. Sellier
CNRS, Inst. NEEL, F38042 Grenoble, France
 B. Brun
 , G. Bachelier
 , S. Huant
 & H. Sellier
IMCN/NAPS, Université catholique de Louvain, B1348 LouvainlaNeuve, Belgium
 F. Martins
 , S. Faniel
 , B. Hackens
 & V. Bayot
CNRS, Laboratoire de Photonique et de Nanostructures, UPR20, F91460 Marcoussis, France
 A. Cavanna
 , C. Ulysse
 , A. Ouerghi
 , U. Gennser
 & D. Mailly
CEA, INACSPSMS, F38054 Grenoble, France
 M. Sanquer
Authors
Search for B. Brun in:
Search for F. Martins in:
Search for S. Faniel in:
Search for B. Hackens in:
Search for G. Bachelier in:
Search for A. Cavanna in:
Search for C. Ulysse in:
Search for A. Ouerghi in:
Search for U. Gennser in:
Search for D. Mailly in:
Search for S. Huant in:
Search for V. Bayot in:
Search for M. Sanquer in:
Search for H. Sellier in:
Contributions
B.B. and F.M. performed the lowtemperature SGM experiment with the assistance of S.F., B.H. and V.B.; B.B. and H.S. analysed the experimental data and wrote the paper; A.C., A.O. and U.G. grew the GaAs/AlGaAs heterostructure; C.U. and D.M. processed the sample; S.F., B.H. and F.M. built the lowtemperature scanning gate microscope; G.B. performed the electrostatic simulations; B.B., F.M., S.F., B.H., U.G., D.M., S.H., G.B, V.B., M.S. and H.S. contributed to the conception of the experiment; all authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Corresponding author
Correspondence to H. Sellier.
Supplementary information
PDF files
 1.
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Figures 15, Supplementary Notes 12 and Supplementary References
Rights and permissions
To obtain permission to reuse content from this article visit RightsLink.
About this article
Further reading

Scanning gate imaging of quantum point contacts and the origin of the 0.7 anomaly
Nano Research (2015)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.