Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Time-bin entangled photons from a quantum dot


Long-distance quantum communication is one of the prime goals in the field of quantum information science. With information encoded in the quantum state of photons, existing telecommunication fibre networks can be effectively used as a transport medium. To achieve this goal, a source of robust entangled single-photon pairs is required. Here we report the realization of a source of time-bin entangled photon pairs utilizing the biexciton–exciton cascade in a III/V self-assembled quantum dot. We analyse the generated photon pairs by an inherently phase-stable interferometry technique, facilitating uninterrupted long integration times. We confirm the entanglement by performing quantum state tomography of the emitted photons, which yields a fidelity of 0.69(3) and a concurrence of 0.41(6) for our realization of time-energy entanglement from a single quantum emitter.


A source of entangled photon pairs is essential for quantum communication1,2 and linear optics quantum computing3. Quantum information protocols such as quantum teleportation4,5 and entanglement swapping6,7 use entangled photons to enable long-distance distribution of entanglement through quantum repeaters8. Optical fibres are the medium of choice for distribution, with the existing extensive global telecommunication fibre network. Polarization entangled photons suffer from decoherence in optical fibres due to polarization mode dispersion9,10. This effect results in the wavelength and time-dependent splitting of the principal states of polarization with a differential group delay. Thus the arrival time of the photons carries information about their polarization state causing decoherence. Alternatively, time-bin entangled photons11 are immune to these decoherence mechanisms and are more robust12,13 in optical fibres12. At present, spontaneous parametric down-conversion is widely used as a source of time-bin entangled photons11. Nevertheless, photons produced by a single quantum emitter show inherently sub-Poissonian statistics14. Thus, in this work, we show that the photon cascade in a single semiconductor quantum dot can produce time-bin entangled photon pairs.

So far, experimental efforts have been focused on utilizing the biexciton–exciton cascade of a semiconductor quantum dot as a source of polarization entangled photons15,16,17,18. A major hurdle in the realization of these sources comes from the asymmetry of the self-assembled quantum dots that results in non-degenerate exciton polarization states, thereby revealing the polarization state of the emitted photons. This hurdle has been overcome by some groups with great effort19,20,21,22,23, but these technologies are not generally available.

Our entanglement scheme combines the strength of a quantum dot as a single-photon source and the robustness of time-bin entanglement. We use only one exciton polarization cascade so that the emitted photons are in a well-defined polarization mode. Nevertheless, our scheme is fairly insensitive to the polarization non-degeneracy; the polarization of the detected photon does not contain any information about the creation time-bin of the photon pair. Schemes to generate single pairs of time-bin entangled photons using the biexciton cascade in a quantum dot have been proposed24,25. While these schemes require the quantum dot to be initially prepared in a long-living metastable state, we implement time-bin entanglement through resonant excitation of the biexciton from the ground state. This method can produce maximally entangled states but it does not completely suppress double excitations. In this work we show time-bin entanglement generated by a single quantum emitter. Our measurement yields a fidelity of 0.69(3) and a concurrence of 0.41(6).


Writing the quantum superposition

To excite the quantum dot we use a pump interferometer that transforms the incoming laser pulse into a coherent superposition of two pulses that form well-defined time bins ‘early’ and ‘late’. The delay in the pump interferometer is set such that the time difference (Δt=3.2 ns) between the early and late bins is longer than the width of the laser pulse (4 ps) and coherence time of the biexciton (211 ps) and exciton (119 ps) photons. These laser pulse pairs excite the quantum dot biexciton state through the resonant two-photon excitation process shown in Fig. 1a. Details of the excitation process and experimental set-up can be found in ref. 26. The schematic of time-bin entanglement generation from a quantum dot and its spectrum are shown in Fig. 1c,b, respectively. The relative phase between the pump pulses creating two-photon excitations is given by φP=EXXΔt/, where EXX is the energy of the biexciton photon. Resonant excitation is crucial as it coherently transfers the phase of the pump pulses and thus the coherence created by the pump interferometer to the biexciton state. The coherence of the excitation process was proved in our previous work26, through coherent manipulation experiments demonstrating Ramsey interference. In contrast, other, non-resonant excitation techniques involve phonon transitions, which leak the creation time of the biexciton to the environment27, thereby degrading the coherence. At sufficiently low excitation power the biexciton state is created either by the early or by the late pulse, followed by the emission of a biexciton–exciton photon cascade. The emitted photons are in the time-bin entangled state

Figure 1: Schematic of time-bin entanglement generation and analysis.

(a) Energy-level scheme for resonant two-photon excitation of a biexciton (|b›) from the ground state (|g›). The H-polarized pump laser populates the biexciton state resonantly through a virtual level (dashed grey line). Following the excitation, a V-polarized biexciton (XXV) exciton (XV) photon cascade is generated through the intermediate exciton state (|xV›). Exciton and biexciton photons are detuned from the excitation laser due to the biexciton binding energy Eb. (b) Quantum dot emission spectrum. (c) Scheme to generate and analyse time-bin entangled photons. Outputs of analysing interferometers, X1, X2, XX1 and XX2, are fibre coupled to avalanche photon diodes (APD). Here, φP, φX and φXX are the phases in the pump and analysing interferometers, respectively, and Δt is the time difference between the early and late time bins.

where the photon pairs are in a coherent superposition of being emitted in the early or late time bin. The subscripts X and XX refer to the exciton and biexciton recombination photon, respectively. We analyse the entanglement of the emitted photons in a time-bin-interference experiment11 as shown in Fig. 1c. The exciton and biexciton photons are fed into two separate analysing interferometers that have delays equal to the pump interferometer. Finally, we record the coincidences between the outputs of the analysing exciton and biexciton interferometers. Photon pairs produced by the early pulse and taking the long path in the analysing interferometers are indistinguishable from photon pairs produced by the late pulse and taking the short path. Thus, the probability amplitudes of the two possible indistinguishable events interfere. This interference results in a sinusoidal change of the coincidence rates while the phase of one of the interferometers is varied. The relationship between coincidence counts and interferometer phase can be approximated28 by

with i, j taken as +1(−1) for the XX and X outputs 1(2), respectively. Here, φX(XX) is the phase of the exciton (biexciton) analysing interferometer. The visibility (V) of the interference is connected to the quality of the time-bin entanglement and it is ideally equal to unity. In order to achieve maximum visibility the phase (φXX+φXφP) has to be stable during the experiment. This can be accomplished by active stabilization of all three interferometers with respect to a phase-stable laser. In our experiment, the phase stability is achieved by realizing the pump and analysing interferometers in three different spatial modes of a single bulk interferometer as shown in Fig. 2. We take advantage of the phase relation, such that the relative phase always remains the same independent of the drift in the interferometer. The phase of both the analysing interferometers can be set independently with the phase plates PPX and PPXX.

Figure 2: One bulk interferometer hosts both the pump and analysing interferometers.

The interferometer is built with a 50:50 beam splitter cube and two retro-reflectors. The pump laser and the single photon pairs are in separate spatial modes. In- and out-coupling of photons in the interferometer is made via single-mode fibres. The phases of the biexciton and exciton analysing interferometers are controlled with phase plates, PPXX and PPX.

Detection in post-selection

In order to extract the single events and coincidences between the photons at the outputs of the two analysing interferometers we record the arrival times of the photons with respect to the pump pulse. The triggering to the laser pulse is essential because it allows us to separate distinguishable from indistinguishable events. For example, Fig. 3a shows the recorded single events for the output X1. The photons created by the early (late) pulse and travelling the short (long) path form the first (third) peak. The second peak is formed by photons created by the early excitation taking the long path and the photons created by the late excitation taking the short path. For our analysis we post-select only the photons arriving within a window of 1.28 ns in each of the peaks, shaded with grey in Fig. 3a. From the post-selected events we extract coincidences between the outputs of the two analysing interferometers. The resulting histogram has five peaks (see Fig. 4). The first (last) peak consists of the pairs created by the early (late) pulse and passing through the short (long) paths of the analysing interferometers. Also, the second and the fourth peaks represent distinguishable events, where the biexciton and exciton photons have travelled along opposite interferometer arms. Thus the second (fourth) peak exclusively shows coincidences created by the early (late) pulse. The third peak shows the indistinguishable events that interfere and exhibit entanglement.

Figure 3: Time-bin qubit and Bloch sphere representation.

(a) Arrival time of the exciton photons recorded with respected to the pump pulse. The grey-shaded regions are the 1.28 ns windows taken for extracting the triple coincidences (laser–biexciton–exciton). The side peaks are the projections onto the time-basis states |0› and |1›. The middle peak is the projection onto the energy bases |±X› and |±Y› for the phase settings φX=0 and π/2, respectively. Here, subscript A stands for the analysing and P for the pump interferometer. (b) The time-bin qubit states are represented on a Bloch sphere.

Figure 4: Coincidences between biexciton and exciton outputs of the analysing interferometers.

The coincidences are triggered on the laser-pulse arrival. The coincidences were recorded for phase settings: (a) φXX+φX=0 and (b) φXX+φX=π. The arrival time is represented as the sum tXX+tX, where tXX(X) is the arrival time of the biexciton (exciton) recombination photon with respect to the laser trigger.

Tomography measurements

We quantify the time-bin entanglement of the emitted photon pairs by measuring their quantum state through quantum state tomography29. With this method we reconstruct the density matrix of the generated time-bin entangled photons. We record coincidence events for different projections of the individual qubits (exciton and biexciton photons) to the states |0›, |1›, |+X› and |+Y› (represented on the Bloch sphere shown in Fig. 3b). Projections onto the states |X› and |Y› (energy basis) are achieved by setting the phase in the analysing interferometer to 0 and , respectively. It takes four measurements (see Methods) to obtain all 16 projections of the entangled two-qubit state that are required for the tomographic state reconstruction29. The analysing interferometers phase settings for these four measurements are . The real and imaginary parts of the reconstructed density matrix are shown in Fig. 5, from which we obtain a fidelity of 0.69(3) with respect to the |Φ+› state, a tangle of 0.17(5) and a concurrence of 0.41(6). In addition, the visibilities in three orthogonal bases 0/1, +X/−X and +Y/−Y were measured to be 78.94(2)%, 41.40(3)% and 37.79(3)%, respectively. The raw counts used to reconstruct the density matrix are given in Supplementary Table 1.

Figure 5: Reconstructed density matrix ρ plotted as a bar chart.

(a) Real part. (b) Imaginary part. The reduced value of 0.44 for the 00 (early-early) and 11 (late–late) populations is a consequence of the double excitations that appear as 01 (early–late) and 10 (late–early) populations. The reduced value of the off-diagonal elements (coherences) of about 0.24 comes from the lack of finite coherence of the excitation and emission processes in the quantum dot.


The imperfect interference visibility and hence the reduced fidelity and concurrence of the entangled state can mainly be attributed to double excitation and environment-induced dephasing. Ideally, we expect pairs to be produced in only one of the two pulses. Nevertheless, there is a finite probability that both early and late pulse generate a photon pair. For this first realization of time-bin entanglement we chose a relatively high excitation power as a compromise between the quality of the entanglement and count rate. For this power we calculate from our data a 12.4% contribution of such events. The coincidences between these double excitations form an incoherent background, hence reducing the visibilities in all three orthogonal bases. For example, if we reduced the excitation pulse power by 75% we estimate visibilities of 95.11(3)%, 48.47(3)% and 51.34(3)%, for 0/1, +X/−X and +Y/−Y bases, respectively. Correspondingly we would then obtain 0.48(6) for the tangle, 0.61(6) for the concurrence and 0.79(4) for the fidelity (for details see Supplementary Note 1).

Beyond double excitations some decoherence of the entangled state originates from the pure dephasing of excitons and biexcitons in the solid-state environment due to phonon interactions and spectral diffusion. These interactions leak information about the creation time of the biexciton27 and energy fluctuations of the excitons reduce the visibility of two-photon interference. The dephasing in the quantum dot used for the experiment is characterized with lifetime (biexciton: 405 ps, exciton: 771 ps) and coherence length (biexciton: 211 ps, exciton: 119 ps) measurements, which are far from the ideal transform limited condition. Time-bin entanglement measures the mutual coherence between the emission of the early and the late cascade, not the coherence between the individual photons. Therefore we cannot directly use these numbers to calculate the required mutual coherence without a full quantum optical model of the quantum dot and its environment.

We generate time-bin entangled photons from a quantum dot using the biexciton–exciton cascade. As far as we know this is the first realization of energy-time entanglement from a single quantum emitter of any type. This was made possible by our method of coherent excitation of the biexciton26. Reconstructing the density matrix through quantum state tomography unambiguously confirms the entanglement of the generated photon pairs. At the same time, our source is distinguished from spontaneous parametric down-conversion sources by its sub-Poissonian photon statistics. Because our scheme is not affected by fine-structure splitting it can be applied to a much larger variety of quantum dots than polarization entanglement and it also directly provides the most robust kind of entanglement.

Higher extraction efficiencies, which can be achieved with quantum dots in coupled pillar microcavities19, would immediately improve the entanglement of our source in two ways: (1) one would be able to measure at lower excitation power for the same count rate, thus reducing the unwanted double excitations, and (2) the Purcell enhancement of the microcavity would improve the indistinguishability30 of the emitted photons and in turn the two-photon interference. In the long run, to achieve scalability of the source we will need to eliminate the double excitations that reduce the entanglement by identifying a metastable state24,25 that can serve as an initialization state. We expect that such an initialization state will also reduce the dephasing during the coherent excitation process and therefore allow us to reach levels of entanglement achievable by parametric down-conversion (Supplementary Tables 2 and 3).


A measurement of the arrival time of a photon at the output of the analysing interferometer with respect to the excitation laser gives rise to the three peaks shown in Fig. 3a. Here, the first and the last peak carry the information on classical correlations (between |0› and |1›) and the middle peak shows quantum correlations. For example, |+Y, 0› is a projection where the biexciton photon is projected onto the energy basis and the exciton is projected onto the time basis. The joined projections onto the time basis (|0, 0›, |0, 1›, |1, 0›, |1, 1›) are obtained as coincidence events in respective combination of the time intervals measured between the outputs of the analysing interferometers for biexciton and exciton. Projections onto the energy bases (|Y›, |X›) are obtained from respective specific phase settings by extracting coincidence events in the time of arrival of the middle peak for the exciton and biexciton signals. Projections with energy and time bases combinations (|0, +Y›, |+Y, 0›, |+Y, 1›, |1, +Y›, |0, +X›, |+X, 0›, |1, +X›, |+X, 1›) are collected from coincidence events in the interval of arrival of the respective middle and side peaks. In order to obtain the measurement errors we performed a 100-run Monte Carlo simulation of the data with a Poissonian noise model applied to the measured values. The single count rate in the measurements was 4k counts for both exciton and biexciton, collected and detected in a single-mode fibre. The wavelength of the entangled photons is around 920 nm (Fig. 1b). The time resolution of the avalanche photo detector is 200 ps and the quantum efficiency is 20%. We estimate the rate of entangled photon pairs to be 0.6 counts s−1.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Jayakumar, H. et al. Time-bin entangled photons from a quantum dot. Nat. Commun. 5:4251 doi: 10.1038/ncomms5251 (2014).


  1. 1

    Gisin, N. & Thew, R. Quantum communication. Nature Photon. 1, 165–171 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Duan, L.-M., Lukin, M. D., Cirac, J. I. & Zoller, P. Long-distance quantum communication with atomic ensembles and linear optics. Nature 414, 413–418 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Knill, E., Laflamme, R. & Milburn, G. J. A scheme for efficient quantum computation with quantum optics. Nature 409, 46–52 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Bouwmeester, D. et al. Experimental quantum teleportation. Nature 390, 575–579 (1997).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    de Riedmatten, H. et al. Long distance quantum teleportation in a quantum relay configuration. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 047904 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Pan, J.-W., Bouwmeester, D., Weinfurter, H. & Zeilinger, A. Experimental entanglement swapping: entangling photons that never interacted. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3891–3894 (1998).

    ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    de Riedmatten, H. et al. Long-distance entanglement swapping with photons from separated sources. Phys. Rev. A 71, 050302 (2005).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Briegel, H. J., Dür, W., Cirac, J. I. & Zoller, P. Quantum repeaters: the role of imperfect local operations in quantum communication. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5932 (1998).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Brodsky, M., George, E. C., Antonelli, C. & Shtaif, M. Loss of polarization entanglement in a fiber-optic system with polarization mode dispersion in one optical path. Opt. Express 36, 43–45 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Antonelli, C., Shtaif, M. & Brodsky, M. Sudden death of entanglement induced by polarization mode dispersion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 080404 (2011).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Brendel, J., Gisin, N., Tittel, W. & Zbinden, H. Pulsed energy-time entangled twin-photon source for quantum communication. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2594 (1999).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Dynes, J. F. et al. Efficient entanglement distribution over 200 kilometers. Opt. Express 17, 11440–11449 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Honjo, T. et al. Long-distance distribution of time-bin entangled photon pairs over 100 km using frequency up-conversion detectors. Opt. Express 15, 13957–13964 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Predojević, A. et al. Efficiency vs. multi-photon contribution test for quantum dots. Opt. Express 22, 4789–4798 (2014).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Stevenson, R. M. et al. A semiconductor source of triggered entangled photon pairs. Nature 439, 179–182 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Akopian, N. et al. Entangled photon pairs from semiconductor quantum dots. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 130501 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Ghali, M., Ohtani, K., Ohno, Y. & Ohno, H. Generation and control of polarization-entangled photons from GaAs island quantum dots by an electric field. Nature Commun. 3, 661 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Muller, A., Fang, W., Lawall, J. & Solomon, G. S. Creating polarization-entangled photon pairs from a semiconductor quantum dot using the optical stark effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 217402 (2009).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Dousse, A. et al. Ultrabright source of entangled photon pairs. Nature 466, 217–220 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Kuroda, T. et al. Symmetric quantum dots as effcient sources of highly entangled photons. Phys. Rev. B 88, 041306(R) (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Trotta, R. et al. Universal recovery of the energy-level degeneracy of bright excitons in InGaAs quantum dots without a structure symmetry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 147401 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Juska, G. et al. Towards quantum-dot arrays of entangled photon emitters. Nature Photon. 7, 527–531 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Trotta, R. et al. Highly entangled photons from hybrid piezoelectric-semiconductor quantum dot devices. Nano Lett. 14, 3439–3444 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Simon, C. & Poizat, J.-P. Creating single time-bin-entangled photon pairs. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 030502 (2005).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Pathak, P. K. & Hughes, S. Coherent generation of time-bin entangled photon pairs using the biexciton cascade and cavity-assisted piecewise adiabatic passage. Phys. Rev. B 83, 245301 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Jayakumar, H. et al. Deterministic photon pairs and coherent optical control of a single quantum dot. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 135505 (2013).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Roszak, K., Machnikowski, P. & Jacak, L. Phonon-induced dephasing in quantum dots - interpretation in terms of information leakage. Acta Phys. Polon. A 110, 325 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Franson, J. D. Bell inequality for position and time. Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2205–2208 (1989).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Takesue, H. & Noguchi, Y. Implementation of quantum state tomography for time-bin entangled photon pairs. Opt. Express 17, 10976–10989 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Huber, T. et al. Measurement and modification of biexciton-exciton time correlations. Opt. Express 21, 9890–9898 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was funded by the European Research Council (project EnSeNa) and the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research through its Quantum Information Processing program. G.S.S. acknowledges partial support through the Physics Frontier Center at the Joint Quantum Institute (PFC@JQI).

Author information




The quantum dot sample was fabricated by G.S.S. H.J., A.P., and G.W. conceived the experiments. H.J.and T.K. performed the experiments and A.P. and T.H. the data analysis. Density matrix reconstruction and entanglement tests were performed by A.P.. H.J, A.P, and G.W wrote the article with inputs from all the other co-authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana Predojević.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Tables 1-3, Supplementary Note 1 and Supplementary References (PDF 109 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jayakumar, H., Predojević, A., Kauten, T. et al. Time-bin entangled photons from a quantum dot. Nat Commun 5, 4251 (2014).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing