The amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere continues to rise and rather rapidly due to unparalleled cumulative CO2 emissions, provoking the undesirable greenhouse gas effect. Certainly, it is becoming critical to develop economical and practical pathways to reduce the CO2 emissions; and appropriately prospective routes to address this enduring challenge are considered: (i) CO2 emission reduction from post-combustion stationary and mobile sources1 where CO2 concentration is in the range of 10–15% and (ii) CO2 removal from air called direct air capture (DAC), which is another alternative option to reduce greenhouse gases emissions in a uniform way globally1,2,3,4. Although DAC is relatively more challenging than post-combustion capture, it is recognized that it might be practical, provided that suitable adsorbent combining optimum uptake, kinetics, energetics and CO2 selectivity is available at trace CO2 concentration5.

In addition, efficient and cost-effective removal of trace CO2 is of prime importance in various key industrial applications pertaining to energy, environment and health. From an industrial perspective, the removal of trace CO2 from air is a growing area of research and development due to its substantial importance for prepurification of air and particularly when atmospheric air is used during the separation of nitrogen and oxygen. In fact, before air separation using cryogenic distillation or pressure swing adsorption, air must be CO2 free to avoid (i) blockage of heat-exchange equipment as a result of frozen CO2 during the liquefaction process6,7 and (ii) adsorbents (for example, zeolites) contamination used for oxygen production by pressure swing adsorption8,9,10.

Equally important, alkaline fuel cells require a CO2 free feedstock of oxygen and hydrogen gases as it is widely recognized that trace amounts of CO2 (that is, 300 p.p.m.) degrade the electrolyte in alkaline fuel cells11. Furthermore, efficient removal of CO2 at low concentrations is also vital for the proper operation of breathing systems in confined spaces such as submarines and aerospace shuttles12,13,14. In fact, in long-term space flight and submarine missions, CO2 must be removed from the air and recycled because resupply opportunities are scarce. An average crew member requires approximately 0.84 kg of oxygen and emits approximately 1 kg of CO2 per day14. Thus, the ability to continuously purify the exhaled air (with a maximum CO2 concentration of 2–5%) will lead to an optimal recycling and considerable reduction in fresh air supply in remote confined spaces.

Efficient CO2 removal and resupply of fresh air is also critical in mining and rescue missions15, diving and most importantly in medical applications such as anaesthesia machines16. The use of anaesthesia machines is still a growing clinical trend worldwide, driven by the need to reduce cost and improve patient care via the use of efficient CO2 sorbents. The CO2 removal feature in anaesthesia machines is particularly important in semi-closed or closed rebreathing systems, as the rebreathing fraction is at least 50% of the exhaled gas volume, directed back to the patient after proper CO2 removal in the next exhalation. Sodalime is currently the sorbent of choice in most commercially available anaesthesia machines. This sorbent exhibits a high CO2 removal efficiency from exhaled air, with an average continuous operation of about 24 h using a prepacked commercial cartridge17. Nevertheless, a major drawback of this technology is that one sodalime cartridge can only be used for a single cycle and is non-recyclable, therefore generating undesirable waste as it should be disposed properly.

Evidently, there is a pressing need to develop novel porous materials18 that can adequately address the growing interest in low CO2 concentration removal applications10. It is important to mention that only few materials were reported to efficiently adsorb traces of CO2, particularly with regards to DAC using a variety of amine-supported materials (for example, porous silica)10,19.

Our quest for made-to-order materials that can address efficiently the separation and capture of trace CO2 has prompted us to explore the potential of a burgeoning class of modular and tunable porous materials, namely metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), to tackle this ongoing challenge. Recently, MOFs were investigated intensively for intermediate and high CO2 concentration removal applications such as post-combustion and precombustion capture, natural gas and biogas upgrading20,21,22,23. Nevertheless, the potential of MOFs to remove trace and low CO2 concentration from gas streams was rarely debated24,25,26,27,28. The main reason for this lack of studies is that most of MOFs reported so far, with or without unsaturated metal centres or/and functionalized ligands, exhibit relatively low CO2 uptake and selectivity particularly at relatively low CO2 partial pressure. To overcome this downfall, various research groups have adopted the amine grafting chemistry and the acquired knowledge from amine-supported silica19,22 as a prospective pathway to enhance the CO2 adsorption energetics and uptake in MOFs and covalent organic frameworks27,28,29. Particularly, Jones and co-workers28 reported for the first time the effect of ethylenediamine grafting on Mg-MOF-74 as a support for CO2 adsorption from ultradilute gas streams such as ambient air. Correspondingly, Long and co-workers investigated the effect of N,N-dimethylethylenediamine grafting for DAC using an expanded isostructure of Mg-MOF-74 (ref. 27)27. Markedly, the few reported strategies targeting air capture using MOFs are centred on the aptitude of grafted amines to form a strong chemical bond (at least 70 kJ mol−1) with CO2, affording high affinity toward CO2 and therefore high CO2 selectivity.

There is no reported study hitherto, to the best of our knowledge, on tuning the pore size of physical adsorption–based MOFs to target trace and low-concentration CO2 removal. In this communication, we report how the reasoned choice of the appropriate MOF platform (here, SIFSIX-3-Cu material), characterized by suitable pore size, combined with the optimal CO2 energetics (that is, strong, uniform and relatively low to allow reversible physical adsorption–desorption), is the key to target made-to-order porous materials for trace and low CO2 concentration removal in general and DAC application in particular.


Preparation and characterization of SIFSIX-3-Cu analogue

The SIFSIX-3-Cu analogue was successfully prepared by layering a methanol solution of pyrazine in a glass tube onto a methanol solution of CuSiF6 × H2O. On layering, an extremely fast formation of light violet powder was observed, which was left for 24 h in the mother solution. The powder was then collected and washed extensively with methanol then dried under vacuum and characterized using powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD).

The PXRD diagram of SIFSIX-3-Cu analogue studied in this work was found not to match any related reported structures, that is, the Cu-2D structures or the 3D Zn analogue reported by Kita and co-workers30 (Supplementary Fig. 1). Despite extensive attempts, we were not able to isolate synthetic conditions affording single crystals of sufficient size suitable for single crystal diffraction studies and therefore structural determination by powder diffractometry was explored.

The PXRD pattern of the crystalline powder, resulting from the reaction of CuSiF6 × H2O with pyrazine in methanolic solution, was recorded on a high resolution PANalytical X’Pert MPD-PRO diffractometer with Cu–Kα radiation (λ=1.5406 Å) in the range of 4 to 80° using a step of 0.05° (250 s per step). The indexation of the PXRD diagram, carried out using the McMaille software30, yielded a primitive orthorhombic cell (M(20)=42.3 and F(20)=39.9 (0.0139, 36)). The cell parameters, a=b=6.919(1) Å, c=7.906(1) Å, were refined by a whole powder pattern fit using the Le Bail method31, implemented in the FULLPROF software32, and were consistent with those of the previously described SIFSIX-3-Zn. Hence, atomic positions of the latter were used as structure solution. The final Rietveld refinement permitted access to satisfactory results: RBragg=0.051 and RFactor=0.056 (Supplementary Fig. 2). The crystallographic data and refinement parameters of SIFSIX-3-Cu are summarized in Supplementary Table 1.

As initially expected, it is in very good agreement with the 3D structure of the Zn analogue reported previously (Fig. 1), but with a slightly smaller unit cell (378 versus 388 Å3) attributed to the relatively stronger bonding between the Cu(II) and the pyrazine (Supplementary Data 1, Supplementary Table 2). The smaller unit cell of the Cu analogue is in good agreement with the relatively sharp pore size distribution analysis centred at 3.5 Å (average pore size), as determined from the CO2 adsorption isotherms, using NLDFT model, which shows a smaller average pore size than the SIFSIX-3-Zn (3.5–4 Å) (Fig. 2a). The thermal gravimetric analysis of the SIFSIX-3-Cu showed a weight loss of about 10% for the dried sample in the range of 50–150 °C attributed to guest molecules (Supplementary Fig. 3). Further gradual loss was observed above 150 °C and attributed to the framework decomposition. The thermal gravimetric analysis data for the SIFSIX-3-Cu is in a good agreement with the one reported for the SIFSIX-3-Zn analogue. Infrared spectrum for the SIFSIX-3-Cu (Supplementary Fig. 4) exhibits bands characteristic of the C–H aromatic bonds associated to the pyrazine moiety at 3,114 and 3,073 cm−1 and bands characteristic for the C–N bond at 1,445, 1,122 and 1,070 cm−1. Furthermore, the characteristic bands associated with the octahedral SiF6 were also observed at 743 and 833 cm−1 (ref. 33).

Figure 1: Pore size tuning.
figure 1

Pore size tuning of the channel structures of (a) SIFSIX-2-Cu-i, (b) SIFSIX-3-Zn or/and SIFSIX-3-Cu. (a) SIFSIX-2-Cu-i; pores size 5.15 Å, Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) apparent surface area (N2 adsorption) 735 m2 g−1. (b) SIFSIX-3-Zn; pores size 3.84 Å, BET apparent surface area 250 m2 g−1 (determined from the CO2 adsorption isotherm at 298 K); SIFSIX-3-Cu; pores size 3.50 Å (NLDFT), BET and langmuir apparent surface area ca. 300 m2 g−1 (determined from the CO2 adsorption isotherm at 298 K). Colour code: Dipyridylacetylene (dpa, thick light green polygon), pyrazine (pyz, blue polygon), Zn, Cu (purple polyhedra), Si (light blue spheres), F (light green spheres). All guest molecules are omitted for clarity. Note that the grey net represents the interpenetrated net in SIFSIX-2-Cu-i.

Figure 2: CO2 adsorption isotherms.
figure 2

CO2 adsorption isotherms at variable temperatures for SIFSIX-3-Cu. The SIFSIX-3-Cu analogue shows asteeper variable temperature adsorption isotherms at very low pressure indicative of strong CO2-SIFSIX-3-Cu interactions. (a) pore size distribution (PSD) derived from the CO2 sorption isotherm (CO2 at 273 K NLDFT) for SIFSIX-3-Cu. The PSD extracted from adsorption isotherms, shows an average pore size for SIFSIX-3-Cu centred at 3.5 Å(b).

CO2 adsorption studies

In order to evaluate the potential of SIFSIX-3-Cu for CO2 capture, we performed various CO2 adsorption studies. It was our preconception that this new Cu analogue should at least show the same promising adsorption properties as the SIFSIX-3-Zn23. The Cu analogue shows even steeper variable temperature adsorption isotherms (Fig. 2a) at very low pressure indicative of relatively stronger CO2- SIFSIX-3-Cu interactions than the Zn analogue

In order to further explore the possible sorption mechanistic behind this relatively enhanced uptake at low CO2 loading, we explored the competitive adsorption kinetics of CO2/N2:10/90, CO2/CH4:50/50, CO2/H2:30/70 gas mixture adsorption (Supplementary Fig. 5). As anticipated and based on similar studies carried out on the Zn analogue23, the uptake at equal times, including at equilibrium, for variable CO2 compositions mixtures follows the behaviour of pure CO2. These findings suggest that similarly to the mechanistic suggested for SIFSIX-3-Zn, when CO2 containing mixtures are in contact with SIFSIX-3-Cu, CO2 adsorbs more strongly (Supplementary Fig. 6) and rapidly than N2 and by analogy also O2, CH4 and H2 (Supplementary Fig. 5), thus occupying favourably most of the available space and adsorption sites and subsequently exclude other gases, a desirable feature in many CO2 separation and purification applications.

Interestingly, on the substitution of Zn by Cu, the Qst of CO2 adsorption in the contracted structure increased by 20%, from 45 to 54 kJ mol−1 (Fig. 3b), in perfect agreement with the relatively steeper CO2 adsorption isotherms in the case of the Cu analogue at very low pressure.

Figure 3: CO2 volumetric uptake.
figure 3

CO2 volumetric uptake for SIFSIX-3-Cu at 298 K compared with SIFSIX-3-Zn, SIFSIX-2-Cu-I and Mg-MOF-74. The adsorption results at very low pressure (400 p.p.m.-5%) for the SIFSIX-3-Cu showed that the Cu analogue exhibits steeper adsorption isotherms at very low CO2 concentration in comparison with other materials. At 7.6 torr (0.01 bar), SIFSIX-3-Cu uptakes 82.6 cm3(STP)/cm−3 versus 55 and 28 cm3(STP)/cm−3 for SIFSIX-3-Zn and Mg-MOF-74, respectively (a). Isosteric heats of adsorption at low coverage for SIFSIX-3-Cu, SIFSIX-3-Zn and SIFSIX-2-Cu-I. The Qst for SIFSIX-3-Cu was observed to be higher than the Zn analogue and steady constant up to relatively higher recorded CO2 loadings. This is indicative of the presence of homogenous binding sites over the full range of CO2 loading for SIFSIX-3-Cu (b).

Column breakthrough experiments

Furthermore, the CO2 selectivity for SIFSIX-3-Zn and SIFSIX-3-Cu was investigated experimentally at trace CO2 using column breakthrough tests for binary CO2/N2: 1,000 p.p.m./99.9% mixture (Fig. 4a) at 298 K in dry as well as in humid conditions. The derived selectivity at breakthrough time (and not equilibrium) is intended to reflect the real selectivity in real processes. In a dry condition, the first CO2 signal downstream the column was observed only after ca. 798 and ca. 1,922 min g−1 for SIFSIX-3-Zn and SIFSIX-3-Cu, respectively, after starting continuous CO2/N2 gas mixture flux (5 cm3 min−1), while N2 breakthrough occurred immediately in few seconds. Accordingly, at 1,000 p.p.m. CO2 and breakthrough time, SIFSIX-3-Cu shows higher selectivity (ca. 10500) than SIFSIX-3-Zn (7259). It is to mention that calculated and measured selectivity exceeding 1,000–2,000 are often subject to uncertainties associated with measurement of the gas uptake of weakly adsorbed gases (N2; Supplementary Fig. 6) in the mixture, thus the reported selectivity is aimed mainly for relative comparison of the studied compounds in this work. In view of that, a direct comparison between the SIFSIX-3-Cu and the SIFSIX-3-Zn sorption properties show a 50% relative increase in CO2 selectivity at 1,000 ppm CO2 in a N2 stream (ca. 10500 versus 7259). The steeper CO2 signal after breakthrough for SIFSIX-3-Cu as compared with the Zn analogue is a direct indication of the steeper CO2 adsorption for the Cu analogue as shown in Fig. 3a.

Figure 4: Column breakthrough experiments.
figure 4

Column breakthrough test of CO2/N2:1,000 p.p.m./99.9% for SIFSIX-3-Cu, SIFSIX-3-Zn in dry condition (a). Column breakthrough test of CO2/N2:1,000 p.p.m./99.9% for SIFSIX-3-Cu in dry as well as at 74% RH (b). The CO2 selectivity for SIFSIX-3-Zn and SIFSIX-3-Cu was investigated experimentally at trace CO2 using column breakthrough tests for binary CO2/N2: 1,000 p.p.m./99.9% mixture at 298 K in dry as well as in humid conditions. In dry condition, the first CO2 signal downstream the column was observed only after ca. 798 and ca. 1922, min g−1 for SIFSIX-3-Zn and SIFSIX-3-Cu, respectively, after starting continuous CO2/N2 gas mixture flux (5 cm3 min−1), while N2 breakthrough occurred immediately in few seconds.


Recently, we reported CO2 adsorption study on a series of isoreticular MOFs with periodically arrayed hexafluorosilicate (SIFSIX) pillars, called SIFSIX-2-Cu-i and SIFSIX-3-Zn (Fig. 1)23. The aforementioned porous MOFs having a combination of tunable pore size (rather than large surface area) coupled with the requisite chemistry led to materials with uniformly aligned strong CO2 adsorption sites and subsequently exhibiting a relatively fast and highly selective CO2 behaviour over N2, CH4 and H2 (ref. 23). Particularly, the denser isoreticular analogue, namely SIFSIX-3-Zn, revealed steeper variable CO2 adsorption isotherms (Supplementary Fig. 7) than SIFSIX-2-Cu-i (Supplementary Fig. 8). This material exhibits unique key features suitable for post-combustion capture (that is, the CO2 partial pressure of 100 mbar), as well as precombustion capture (that is, high CO2 concentration and high pressure).

The pronounced steep CO2 adsorption isotherms over a wide range of temperatures, particularly for this class of MOF materials, has inspired and compelled us to explore the potential of these SIFSIX MOFs for CO2 adsorption in trace concentrations (that is, diluted streams in vacuum or in mixture containing a large fraction of N2 up to 95%). In order to highlight the concealed potential of these MOFs for low CO2 concentration applications (that is, involving CO2 concentration below 5% or 50 mbar CO2 partial pressure, such as anaesthesia machines and prepurification before air separation and air capture), single gas CO2 adsorption properties were evaluated for SIFSIX-2-Cu-i and SIFSIX-3-Zn. Interestingly, the contraction of the pore size from 5.15 Å (for SIFSIX-2-Cu-i) to 3.84 Å (for SIFSIX-3-Zn) has prompted a drastic increase in CO2 uptake (Supplementary Fig. 9) and consequently a recorded highest CO2 uptake ever reported for a given MOF in the range under 5% CO2. Specifically, SIFSIX-3-Zn showed an order of magnitude higher volumetric CO2 uptake (55 cm3 (STP)/cm3) than to date best MOF materials such as Mg-MOF-74, (28 cm3 (STP)/ cm3) at 10 mbar (1% CO2), while UTSA-16 (ref. 34)34, exhibits much lower CO2 uptake similar to SIFSIX-2-Cu-i.

The noticeable impact of pore size contraction on the adsorption energetics and uptake has impelled us to explore various pathways to further reduce the pore size of the SIFSIX-3-M derivative via metal substitution and evaluate its effect on the CO2 adsorption properties. The rational is based on conventional coordination chemistry suggesting that replacement of Zn(II) by Cu(II) to form an isostructural SIFSIX-3-Cu will potentially induce an additional pore contraction due to Jahn–Teller distortions of the octahedral coordination geometry of Cu(II), CuN4F2. The Cu(II) has an open shell valence electron configuration 3d9, in contrast to Zn(II) with a close shell 3d10, and thus will experience a distorted octahedral coordination geometry with potentially elongated Cu–F (fluorine) bonds and relatively shorter Cu–N (nitrogen) bonds (Supplementary Fig. 10 and Supplementary Table 2). Indeed, our analysis of readily available coordination polymers constructed from hexafluorosilicate ions with pyrazine supports our proposal and shows that the bonding of the Cu(II) with pyrazine leads to a slightly shorter M–N bond than the zinc analogue (see Supplementary Table 2)35. Accordingly, it is anticipated that successful substitution of Zn(II) by Cu(II) will permit access to the desired isostructural SIFSIX-3-Cu with relatively contracted pore size than the parent SIFSIX-3-Zn analogue and subsequent evaluation of its relative CO2 adsorption properties.

Examination of the SIFSIX-3-M adsorption results in the spectra of low-concentration applications (400 p.p.m.-5%) showed that the Cu analogue exhibits even steeper adsorption isotherms at very low CO2 concentration (Fig. 3a) translated into the highest uptake ever reported for MOFs without unsaturated metal centres or exposed amino functionality at low CO2 pressures below 38 torr (0.05 bar). This unprecedented finding is even more appealing owing to its fully physical adsorption nature where complete desorption of CO2 was established under vacuum at only 323 K. At 7.6 torr (0.01 bar) SIFSIX-3-Cu uptakes 82.6 cm3(STP).cm−3 versus 55 and 28 cm3(STP).cm−3 for SIFSIX-3-Zn and Mg-MOF-74, respectively. Interestingly, the gravimetric uptake of SIFSIX-3-Cu at 400 p.p.m. and 298 K (1.24 mmol g−1) is ca. 10 and 15 times higher than the corresponding uptakes for SIFSIX-3-Zn (0.13 mmol g−1) and Mg-MOF-74 (0.08 mmol g−1) and even higher than the observed uptakes for most amine-supported silica materials (with optimal compromise of amine loading and kinetics)22 at 298 K (for example TRI-PE-MCM-4 (1 mmol g−1)10,22). Table 1 summarizes the CO2 adsorption uptake at variable low CO2 concentration (partial pressures) for SIFSIX compounds as compared with Mg-MOF-74 and amine-supported materials (including MOFs), relevant to different trace CO2 removal applications. It is to notice that SIFSIX-3-Cu shows even higher CO2 uptake at 400 p.p.m. and 328 K as compared with the corresponding uptake at 323 K for amine functionalized Mg-dobpdc-mmen (Supplementary Table 3).

Table 1 CO2 adsorption uptake comparison.

This increase is mainly attributed to the contracted pore size of the Cu analogue, which in turn (i) results in a relative increase of the charge density surrounding the adsorbed CO2 molecules and (ii) favors the relatively faster CO2 adsorption kinetics in comparison with N2. Indeed, the four flourine atoms pointing to the channel, in the same plane, are creating a proximal local charge density to the adsorbed CO2 molecule, that is, the CO2–F average distance is much narrower in the case of the Cu analogue than the relatively open Zn analogue. It is suggested that the relatively narrower pore size allows and reinforces each CO2 molecule to interact mutually with four fluorine centres, that is, the CO2 molecule can interact potentially with four different surfaces of the square encompassing four fluorine adsorption sites at the same time. The Qst of CO2 adsorption is an intrinsic property that dictates the affinity of the pore surface toward CO2; this in turn plays a major role in determining the adsorption selectivity and the necessary energy to release CO2 during the regeneration step. Although the Qst for CO2 was slightly above the typical range of fully reversible CO2 adsorption (30–50 kJ mol−1)22, SIFSIX-3-Cu was fully and promptly evacuated at 323 K in vacuum (or under N2 flow environment). As in case of SIFSIX-3-Zn and SIFSIX-2-Cu-i, the Qst for CO2 adsorption was steady constant up to relatively high CO2 loadings indicating homogenous binding sites over the full range of CO2 loading (Fig. 3b))23. The aforementioned competitive sorption kinetics of CO2/N2:10/90, CO2/CH4:50/50, CO2/H2:30/70 gas mixture adsorption experiments (Supplementary Fig. 3) suggest a relatively high selective CO2 adsorption that is plausible due to a synergistic interplay between CO2 sorption thermodynamics and kinetics. This high selectivity was confirmed by performing prediction of CO2/N2 gas mixture adsorption at equilibrium using Ideal Adsorption Solution Theory (Supplementary Fig. 11). It is important to notice that the derived selectivity at breakthrough time is non-equilibrium data where, similarly to equilibrium Ideal Adsorption Solution Theory results, a complex interplay between strong electrostatic interactions and favourable kinetics toward CO2 drive the high selectivity of CO2 versus N2. The experimental results of the CO2/N2 gas mixture adsorption testing in dry and humid conditions revealed that the CO2 apparent selectivity at 1,000 p.p.m. CO2 on SIFSIX-3-Cu was not affected by the presence of humidity as shown from the column breakthrough tests performed on both compounds at the relative humidity (RH) of 74% (Fig. 4a). This unprecedented finding was also valid in case of SIFSIX-3-Zn for the removal of low and higher CO2 concentration23.

Finally, as was demonstrated for SIFSIX-3-Zn, SIFSIX-3-Cu is a recyclable and moisture stable MOFs as inferred from the PXRD performed on associated samples after at least four cycles of CO2 adsorption and breakthrough runs under dry and humid conditions (74% RH) (Supplementary Fig. 12).

In conclusion, we showed herein how a material design and engineering approach to pore size control in combination with suitable energetics of favourable electrostatics from an array of inorganic anions affords novel SIFSIX-3-Cu MOF with exceptional CO2 uptake and selectivity in the context of air capture and trace CO2 removal. This unique material exhibits very high CO2 sorption energetics but fully reversible physical driven adsorption–desorption operations at very mild conditions, without the well-documented drawbacks associated with amine reactive chemistry.

This work shows for the first time that MOFs, thanks to their ability for rational pore size modification and inorganic-organics moieties substitution, offer remarkable CO2 physical adsorption attributes in highly diluted gas streams that other class of plain materials are unable to attain. Further work is underway to use the learning gained in the case of SIFSIX-3-M compounds to develop topologically and chemically different MOFs, aiming to target novel MOFs with suitable pore size and high charge density, for use in trace CO2, low and high concentration CO2 removal.


Preparation of SIFSIX-3-Cu

A methanol solution (5.0 ml) of pyrazine (pyz, 0.30 g, 3.0 mmol) was layered in a glass tube onto a methanol solution (5.0 ml) of CuSiF6 × H2O (0.325 g, 0.6 mmol). On layering, a fast formation of light violet powder was observed, and the powder was left for 24 h in the mother solution. The powder was then collected and washed extensively with methanol and then dried under vacuum.


The PXRD patterns were recorded using a Panalytical X’pert PRO MPD X-ray Diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation (λ=0.15418, nm, 45 kV, 40 mA).

Low-pressure adsorption

The low-pressure gas sorption isotherms were collected on Autosorb-1C (Quantachrome Instruments) Surface Area and Porosity Analyzer after activation of SIFSIX-3-Cu as follows. As-synthesized SIFSIX-3-Cu was exchanged with methanol for 3 days. The sample was degassed at room temperature under high vacuum (<5 μm Hg) for 12 h, then to 323 K for another 12 h before adsorption analysis. The apparent surface areas of SIFSIX-3-Cu were determined from the CO2 adsorption isotherm collected at 298 K, respectively by applying the BET and Langmuir models. The determination of the isosteric heat of adsorption (Qst) for CO2 was estimated by applying the Clausius–Clapeyron expression using the CO2 adsorption isotherms measured at 298, 308, 318 and 328 K. The bath temperature was precisely controlled using a Julabo recirculating control system containing a mixture of ethylene glycol and water. Data points below 0.76 Torr were not used for this calculation, in order to avoid possible artifacts at very low coverage.

Measurement of equilibrium and kinetics of adsorption

Adsorption equilibrium measurements of pure gases were performed using a Rubotherm gravimetric–densimetric apparatus (Bochum, Germany) (Supplementary Fig. 13), composed mainly of a magnetic suspension balance and a network of valves, mass flowmeters and temperature and pressure sensors. The magnetic suspension balance overcomes the disadvantages of other commercially available gravimetric instruments by separating the sensitive microbalance from the sample and the measuring atmosphere and is able to perform adsorption measurements across a wide pressure range, that is, from 0 to 20 MPa. The adsorption temperature may also be controlled within the range of 77 to 423 K. In a typical adsorption experiment, the adsorbent is precisely weighed and placed in a basket suspended by a permanent magnet through an electromagnet. The cell in which the basket is housed is then closed and vacuum or high pressure is applied. The gravimetric method allows the direct measurement of the reduced gas adsorbed amount Ω. Correction for the buoyancy effect is required to determine the excess and absolute adsorbed amount using equations 1 and 2, where Vadsorbent and Vss and Vadsorbed phase refer to the volume of the adsorbent, the volume of the suspension system and the volume of the adsorbed phase, respectively.

The buoyancy effect resulted from the adsorbed phase maybe taken into account via correlation with the pore volume or with the theoretical density of the sample.

Kinetic studies of CO2 and CO2/N2:10/90 adsorption on SIFSIX-3-Cu was carried out using the Rubotherm gravimetric apparatus operating in dynamic regime. Initially, SIFSIX-3-Cu was properly evacuated at 323 K in vacuum. In order to achieve an immediate constancy of pressure (0.5 bar) during kinetics tests and avoid the often noisy uptake during the rapid introduction of the studied gas, an initial baseline was set-up using helium gas at 0.5 bar for single gases and 1 bar for mixture, then the studied single gas or mixture is flushed with a flow of 300 ml min−1 to avoid any dependence of the kinetics on the mass flow controller.

Column breakthrough tests

The experimental set-up used for dynamic breakthrough measurements is shown in Supplementary Fig. 13. The gas manifold consisted of three lines fitted with mass flow controllers Line ‘A’ is used to feed an inert gas, most commonly helium, to activate the sample before each experiment. The other two lines, ‘B’ and ‘C’ feed a mixture of CO2 and other gases like N2, CH4 and H2. Hence, gas mixtures with concentrations representative of different industrial gases may be prepared. Whenever required, gases flowing through lines ‘B’ and ‘C’ may be mixed before entering a column packed with SIFSIX-3-Cu using a four-way valve. The stainless steel column was 27 mm in length with 4 mm of inner (6.4 mm outer) diameter. The column downstream was monitored using a Hiden analytical mass spectrometer. In a typical experiment, 0.1–0.4 g of adsorbent was treated at 298 K overnight under helium flow of 5 ml min−1 at 323 K, then the gas flow was switched to the desired gas mixture at the same flow rate. The complete breakthrough of CO2 and other species was indicated by the downstream gas composition reaching that of the feed gas. Experiments in the presence of 74% RH were performed by flowing the gas mixture through water vapour saturator at 20 °C.

The selectivity of CO2 over N2 is calculated using the equation below:

Additional information

How to cite this article: Shekhah, O. et al. Made-to-order metal-organic frameworks for trace carbon dioxide removal and air capture. Nat. Commun. 5:4228 doi: 10.1038/ncomms5228 (2014).

Accession codes: The X-ray crystallographic data for structure reported in this article has been deposited at the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC), under deposition number CCDC 970790. The data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center via