Article | Published:

Rapid fabrication of hierarchically structured supramolecular nanocomposite thin films in one minute

Nature Communications volume 5, Article number: 4053 (2014) | Download Citation


Functional nanocomposites containing nanoparticles of different chemical compositions may exhibit new properties to meet demands for advanced technology. It is imperative to simultaneously achieve hierarchical structural control and to develop rapid, scalable fabrication to minimize degradation of nanoparticle properties and for compatibility with nanomanufacturing. Here we show that the assembly kinetics of supramolecular nanocomposites in thin films are governed by the energetic cost arising from defects, the chain mobility and the activation energy for inter-domain diffusion. By optimizing only one parameter, the solvent fraction in the film, the assembly kinetics can be precisely tailored to produce hierarchically structured thin films of supramolecular nanocomposites in one minute. Moreover, the strong wavelength-dependent optical anisotropy in the nanocomposite highlights their potential applications for light manipulation and information transmission. The present study may open a new avenue in designing manufacture-friendly continuous processing for the fabrication of functional nanocomposite thin films.


Developments in colloidal particle synthesis enable one to engineer nanoparticles with controlled size, shape and chemical composition1,2,3,4,5,6,7. Numerous studies have demonstrated the significant impact of nanoparticle-based materials in life sciences, microelectronics, light manipulation, energy harvesting and storage8,9,10. Co-assemblies of nanoparticles and organic building blocks clearly hold promise for generating nanocomposites using different elements on the periodic table that combine the advantages of both families of building blocks11,12,13,14,15. To fulfill these promises, at least two requirements must be satisfied. One is to control the spatial arrangement of nanoparticles spanning multiple length scales in a reproducible manner, so as to modulate inter-particle coupling and the collective properties of nanocomposites16,17,18,19,20,21. The other is to understand and manipulate the kinetics of the assembly process to ensure compatibility with existing fabrication infrastructures. To be relevant, the fabrication process must be rapid, completed within a few minutes to minimize degradation of nanoparticle properties because of exposure to the processing environment and for compatibility with nanomanufacturing22.

In comparison to many current approaches such as DNA and controlled solvent evaporation, block copolymers (BCPs) provide scalable platforms to obtain nanoscopic organization of nanoparticles, but require favourable nanoparticle–polymer interactions to achieve nanoparticle dispersion, and it remains difficult to control inter-particle ordering within BCP microdomains14,23,24,25. In addition, their self-assembly processes typically require tens of minutes or hours to complete and can lead to degradation of inherent optoelectronic properties of the nanoparticles. Thermal annealing alone or in conjunction with solvent annealing has been used to accelerate the assembly process, but is not suitable for temperature-sensitive nanoparticles26,27.

BCP-based supramolecules are constructed by non-covalently attaching small molecules to polymer side chains. The presence of small molecules eliminates the need to modify either the nanoparticle ligand or polymer for nanoparticle incorporation and improve inter-particle ordering within BCP microdomains. One-, two- and three-dimensional (3D) nanoparticle arrays can be obtained in thin films of supramolecular nanocomposites via solvent annealing for a range of nanoparticles or nanoparticle mixtures17,19,20,28,29. Kinetically, the presence of small molecules also provides unique opportunities to manipulate the energy landscape of the assembly process and to accelerate the assembly kinetics so that inherent properties of nanoparticles can be maintained and continuous thin film processing techniques can be implemented for device fabrication. However, the supramolecular nanocomposite has at least five components during solvent annealing, making it extremely challenging to manipulate the assembly process.

Here, we systematically analyse the thermodynamics and kinetics of self-assembly in thin films of supramolecular nanocomposite upon exposure to solvent vapour. The assembly kinetics depends on the energetic penalty of the excess interfacial area because of defects, the chain mobility and the activation energy for inter-domain diffusion. It is the solvent content in the film, fs, during solvent annealing, rather than the swelling rate, which governs the ordering kinetics and pathway. By optimizing only one parameter, that is, fs, a marked acceleration in the assembly process can be achieved to generate hierarchically structured nanocomposite films in 1 min. The timescale of ordering process demonstrated here, that is, 1 min, is clearly compatible with many scalable manufacturing processes, such as draw coating, ink-jet printing and roll-to-roll fabrication of functional thin films. Furthermore, upon formation of 3D ordered arrays of gold nanoparticles, nanocomposite thin films exhibit a wavelength-dependent optical anisotropy and a rapid switch of polarization states in the visible light regime, confirming the feasibility to generate new functional materials by forming hierarchically structured nanocomposites.


Fabrication of supramolecular nanocomposite thin films

The supramolecular nanocomposite is a blend of 5 nm Au nanoparticles capped with 1-dodecanethiol (Supplementary Fig. 1) and the supramolecule, polystyrene-b-poly-4-vinylpyridine (PS(19 kDa)-b-P4VP(5.6 kDa))(PDP)1.7, prepared by hydrogen-bonding 3-pentadecylphenol (PDP) to the 4VP units of a BCP, PS-b-P4VP at a PDP/4VP ratio of 1.7 (ref. 30). In thin film, after solvent annealing using chloroform, it forms hexagonally packed 3D nanoparticle arrays where the Au nanoparticles are selectively located at the interstitial sites in the P4VP(PDP) matrix (Fig. 1)29.

Figure 1: Supramolecular nanocomposite thin films.
Figure 1

After solvent annealing, the nanocomposite thin film assumes 3D nanoparticle arrays packed in a distorted hexagonal lattice parallel to the surface.

Assembly kinetics during solvent annealing

The solvent fraction during solvent annealing, fs, is determined by monitoring film thickness in situ (Fig. 2a). Figure 2b–e shows the cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of the films quenched at fs=0, 0.13, 0.23 and 0.31, respectively. The diffusion coefficient of CHCl3 in polymer is 10−12 m2 s−1 (refs 31, 32). The solvent molecules are distributed uniformly in the film for the timescale considered here. The as-spun film is microphase-separated with a poorly ordered structure (Fig. 2b). The excess interface resulting from defects results in a sufficient thermodynamic driving force to form ordered nanostructure, provided the components are mobile. Initially, a nanostructure normal to the film surface developed at fs=0.13 (Fig. 2c). This can be attributed to the solvent gradient field normal to the surface during spin casting. Upon further annealing at fs=0.23, the supramolecule locally arranged itself and formed distorted hexagonally packed cylinders oriented parallel to the surface and the nanoparticles ordered within the P4VP(PDP) matrix (Fig. 2d)33. With time, the grain size of the in-plane hexagonal lattice increased from the film surface, resulting in highly ordered hexagonally packed 3D nanoparticle arrays parallel to the surface throughout the film (Fig. 2e).

Figure 2: Structural evolvement as a function of fs.
Figure 2

Cross-sectional TEM images of a 220-nm thin film of a blend of PS(19 kDa)-b-P4VP(5.6 kDa)(PDP)1.7 and 6 vol% of 5 nm Au nanoparticles that was solvent annealed under chloroform vapour at different fs. The film thickness profile during solvent annealing is shown in a. The film was characterized at fs=(b) 0, (c) 0.13, (d) 0.23 and (e) 0.31, respectively. Scale bar=100 nm.

The ex situ TEM results nicely capture the self-assembly pathway of supramolecular nanocomposites in thin films and can be described in terms of the thermodynamics and kinetics in a qualitative manner. Figure 3 shows the energy landscape of the assembly process for two solvent fractions fs, low and fs, high. Gas cast and Gordered refer to the overall energy of the as-cast film and that of the ordered one. Overall, the main driving force for the structural evolution, that is, the energy difference, ΔG, between the as-cast and ordered films, is to minimize the interfacial area at the defects. ΔG can be approximated as γ.ΔA, where γ is the interfacial energy between PS and P4VP(PDP)1.7/nanoparticles and ΔA is the interfacial area because of the defect. , and χeffo(1—fs), where χeff and χo are the Flory–Huggins interaction parameters of the supramolecule with and without solvent, respectively34. As fs, increases, the energetic cost of defects and the thermodynamic driving force to form ordered structure decreases, and thus may lead to a lower assembly rate following the Arrhenius equation.

Figure 3: Qualitative free energy diagram of the assembly pathway.
Figure 3

The as-cast film has the largest value of free energy Gas cast because of the interfacial energy associated with defects. The energy difference between the as-cast and ordered states ΔG is the thermodynamic driving force of the assembly process. G reduces as a function of fs as the solvent mediates energy cost of defects. ΔE corresponds to the activation energy barrier for the supramolecular nanocomposite to order.

Kinetically, the formation of the nanostructure requires the re-arrangement of material in the nanocomposite. The diffusion rate depends on the chain mobility and the energy barrier, ΔEa, for the inter-domain diffusion. The presence of solvent lowers the Tg of the supramolecule, which is estimated to be 34.7, 13.4 and 0 °C at fs=0.13, 0.23 and 0.31, respectively35. The chain mobility of the supramolecule increases as a function of fs. The diffusion constant of the supramolecular nanocomposite should be similar to that of supramolecule or BCP. At the interface between two blocks, a diffusing chain experiences a uniform potential when diffusing parallel to the interface but a periodic potential for perpendicular diffusion, resulting in an anisotropy in the diffusion coefficients parallel to the interface Dpara and normal to the interface Dperp (refs 36, 37, 38). Dperp follows a hindered diffusion mechanism and is expressed as Dperpexp(−ΔEa). ΔEa is proportional to χeff, the enthalpic penalty for pulling one block through the other domain39. The anisotropic diffusion explains the assembly pathway observed in the cross-sectional TEM images in Fig. 2. At low fs, Dpara is higher than Dperp because of the high χeff and the nanocomposite forms cylinders perpendicular to the surface. As fs increases, χeff decreases, so the inter-domain diffusion is less costly, allowing the supramolecule and nanoparticles to rearrange and form a parallel cylindrical morphology.

In situ X-ray scattering measurements

Figure 4 shows the in situ grazing incidence small angle X-ray scattering (GISAXS) studies of 200 nm thin films of PS(19 kDa)-b-P4VP(5.6 kDa)(PDP)1.7/5 nm Au nanoparticle blend that underwent three different solvent treatments. The corresponding atomic force microscopy (AFM) images of the films are also shown. The ordering in the as-cast film is poor, as evidenced by the broad Bragg peak and the structure has an overall vertical alignment biased by the solvent field during spin casting. Upon exposure to the solvent under solvent treatment A where fs was increased from 0 to 0.23 in 10 min, the GISAXS pattern A1 at fs=0.12 shows a diffraction ring from the nanostructure (Fig. 4b). The corresponding AFM image shows the cylindrical microdomains with different orientations with respect to the interface. When fs is between 0.13 and 0.23, there are two spots of increasing intensity along the first Bragg rod, indicating that the cylindrical microdomains are beginning to align parallel to the surface. At fs=0.23, the scattering pattern corresponds to hexagonally packed nanoparticle arrays oriented parallel to the surface. Under solvent treatment B where fs was increased from 0 to 0.31 in 10 min, the film is allowed to reach a higher fs. In GISAXS pattern B3 at fs=0.25 (Fig. 4c), higher order peaks in the diffraction pattern are seen, which shows the completion of the re-orientation of the cylindrical microdomains and the formation of distorted hexagonally packed nanoparticle arrays parallel to the surface. Further annealing (fs=0.31) leads to a larger grain size of the in-plane morphology evidenced by a set of sharper Bragg diffraction peaks in the GISAXS pattern and the improved long-range order seen in the AFM image corresponding to B4. However, when 0.31<fs<0.35 under solvent treatment C, the GISAXS patterns and the corresponding AFM images indicate that the ordered structure deteriorates and becomes disordered at high fs (Fig. 4d). When fs=0.4, the GISAXS pattern at C4 is dominated by the ‘correlation hole’ effect and no clear structure factor features are observed. The lateral grain size for each nanocomposite thin film was estimated using the Scherrer equation and plotted in Fig. 4e as a function of fs. All results fall on one master curve and the largest grain size, 0.47 μm, is obtained at fs=0.31.

Figure 4: In situ GISAXS studies on the assembly pathway and kinetics.
Figure 4

(a) Film thickness versus time profiles of the 220 nm nanocomposite thin films annealed under different solvent treatments during in situ GISAXS measurements. Solvent treatments A, B and C allowed the three nanocomposite thin films to reach fs=0.23, 0.31 and 0.40 in 10 min, respectively. The GISAXS patterns and the corresponding AFM phase images during solvent treatments A, B and C at the points indicated in a are shown in b,c and d, respectively. (e) The plot of the grain size as a function of fs, showing that the ordered nanostructure is optimized at fs=0.31. The dotted line is intended as a visual guide to further elucidate the trend in the grain size change. Scale bar, 100 nm.

Hierarchically structured nanocomposites in 1 min

In addition to fs, the swelling rate is another parameter during the solvent treatments. A series of in situ GISAXS studies were conducted to reach a specific fs at different swelling rates and the grain size was plotted against annealing time for each fs (Fig. 5a). The results show a time-fs superposition phenomenon. The system needs longer annealing time to reach an ordered state at relatively low fs as the assembly rate is facilitated by ΔG but limited by ΔEa and chain mobility. Near the optimal fs, the grain growth rate is very fast initially due to the dominant driving force but eventually experiences retardation as a result of the competition between the kinetic terms and ΔG. The results indicate that fs determines the assembly rate and the solvent entry rate has a minimal role in the assembly kinetics. Similar grain sizes of the optimized nanostructure were observed in the film that reached the same fs at three different swelling rates during annealing (Fig. 5b). Ordered films of hierarchically structured supramolecular nanocomposite can be readily obtained in 1 min. However, the decreasing ΔG at high fs limits the growth of the nanostructure over micrometer scales. To optimize nanostructure in a short period of annealing time at high fs, the solvent treatment is applied to the nanocomposite film on lithographically patterned surface (Fig. 5c). The film reached the optimal fs in 1.5 min during solvent annealing, yielding unidirectional nanoparticle arrays in the nanocomposite film over macroscopic distances in the trenches.

Figure 5: Time-fs superposition during solvent annealing.
Figure 5

A series of in situ GISAXS studies were conducted on six identical nanocomposite thin films. (a) The grain size of the nanostructure was plotted against the required annealing time to reach certain fs. (b) The GISAXS patterns of three identical thin films treated with different swelling rates. Hierarchically structured nanoparticle assemblies can be readily obtained in 1 min. (c) AFM phase image of a 50-nm nanocomposite thin film in lithographically patterned trenches that forms unidirectional nanoparticle arrays over macroscopic distances in 1.5 min. The bright circular dots in the image represent the 5 nm nanoparticles as illustrated by the schematics. Scale bar=100 nm.

Wavelength dependence optical anisotropy

Once the nanocomposite is ordered, the inter-particle distance and coupling are defined, leading to new properties unique to ordered arrays of nanoparticles (Fig. 6)40,41,42,43. For the solvent annealed nanocomposite thin films, the in-plane inter-particle distance is 9.6 nm, smaller than that of out-of-plane (26 nm), thereby leading to a stronger in-plane inter-particle plasmonic coupling to the first approximation. Indeed, a wavelength-dependent optical anisotropy was observed and the optical birefringence, Δn, is close to −0.05 between 400 and 600 nm (Fig. 6b). In contrast, the as-cast film mainly consists of randomly distributed Au nanoparticles and is fairly optically isotropic (Supplementary Figs 2 and 3). Different from other materials with optical anisotropy, the refractive indices of the ordered nanocomposite have strong wavelength dependence. The highest Δn is −0.087 at 544 nm, comparable to that of lithium niobate (Fig. 6c). The complex reflectivity ratio (ρ=rp/rs=tan(Ψ) eiΔ) was measured as a function of wavelength to evaluate the optical properties of nanocomposite thin films, where rp and rs are the complex reflection coefficients for p- and s-polarized light and tan(ψ) and Δ are the changes in amplitude and phase between p and s components of polarized light reflected from the film as shown in Fig. 6d,e, respectively. When the incident angle was close to the Brewster angle, θ=55° in this case, the reflection from the film of supramolecule alone is s-polarized over a broad range of wavelength as expected. For nanocomposites, on the contrary, the presence of Au nanoparticles leads to large changes in both tan(ψ) and Δ (Fig. 6c). The wavelength-dependent polarization was clearly seen between 400 and 550 nm for the nanocomposite thin films before and after solvent annealing. Notably, there is a strong blue shift from 457 to 472 nm (15 nm) when Au nanoparticles are rearranged from disordered to ordered arrays.

Figure 6: Wavelength-dependent optical anisotropy in nanocomposite thin films.
Figure 6

(a) Schematics of the ellipsometry measurements of the in-plane (no+iko) and out-of-plane (ne+ike) components of the complex refractive indices. (b) Real refractive index, no, of different films as a function of wavelength. Ordered nanocomposite thin film shows a pronounced peak near λ=544 nm (highlighted in grey) because of the strong interaction between the incident electromagnetic wave and the collective plasmonic coupling of the ordered nanoparticle chains parallel to the surface. This leads to a wavelength-dependent optical birefringence of the film (Δn−0.087 at 544 nm) for light manipulation applications as shown in c and a wavelength dependence of the reflectivity ratio and the phase difference shown in d and e, respectively.

Thus, the nanocomposite thin films can polarize lights of different wavelength by simply varying the spatial arrangement of nanoparticles. The Au nanoparticle used here is only 5 nm in size and the edge-to-edge distance between two particles is approximately 3–4 nm. Thus, the plasmonic coupling between the nanoparticles is fairly weak as can be seen in the ultraviolet–visible spectra of the nanocomposite thin films (Supplementary Fig. 4). However, simply by varying the nanoparticle assemblies in thin films via the solvent treatment demonstrated here, the macroscopic optical properties of the nanocomposites can be tailored along different directions. It is worthwhile to note that the dimensions of the nanoparticle arrays are at least one order of magnitude smaller than that of visible wavelength. However, the nanocomposite still exhibits quite large optical anisotropy, clearly demonstrating the potential of supramolecular nanocomposites as metamaterials. More importantly, the spatial arrangement of nanoparticles after annealing leads to anisotropic collective properties with strong wavelength dependence even though the inter-particle coupling is rather weak. Thus, the nanocomposite films presented here open an opportunity to manipulate how light of different wavelength interacts with the film to tune the functional wavelength range of the optical coating.


The apparent assembly rate and the pathway in the supramolecular nanocomposite thin film reflect a balance between ΔG, the mobility of the supramolecules and ΔEa, all of which depend on fs. Modulating fs during solvent annealing enables control over the assembly kinetics and pathway in the system. At low fs (for example, fs<0.12), ΔG is large and so is ΔEa. Dperp is lower than Dpara, allowing only short-range diffusion along the interface to improve the perpendicular morphology at intermediate fs (for example, 0.12<fs<0.23), the presence of solvent lowers the ΔEa to make Dperp appreciable. As fs approaches an optimal value, in this case fs=0.31, the nanocomposite orders rapidly. At high fs (for example, fs>0.31), ΔG decreases significantly and assemblies with high defect density or in disordered state were observed even though the increased chain diffusion and lowered ΔEa should facilitate the defect annihilation.

The processing parameters used for supramolecular nanocomposite thin films may also be applicable to other BCP-based systems. However, to achieve the assembly within the absolute timescale presented here, that is, 1 min, which is required to be compatible with current film processing techniques and on-line continuous fabrication, the following factors are unique to supramolecular systems and need to be taken into consideration to design the nanocomposite. Small molecules were shown to control inter-particle ordering, incorporate functionalities and modulate the local environment of nanoparticles28. Here, the presence of PDP modulates the thermodynamics and kinetics and facilitates the fast assembly process during solvent annealing (Supplementary Fig. 5 and Supplementary Discussion). PDP molecules form hydrogen bonds with P4VP to change the polymer chain architecture from coil to comb and reduce chain entanglement. Unbound PDP molecules act as a plasticizer to modulate chain mobility and their spatial arrangement influences χeff. In addition, as PDP has a higher solubility in CHCl3 than the supramolecule, it can act as a solvent absorber to make the entire film swell faster than those with a lesser amount of or no unbound PDP. Thus, the supramolecular system gains mobility rapidly.

In summary, these studies show a comprehensive investigation of the assembly kinetics in the nanocomposite thin films during solvent annealing. By understanding the interplay between the energetic driving forces and kinetic pathways, a fast ordering process with a minimal amount of solvent can be designed to achieve hierarchically structured nanocomposite thin films over macroscopic distances. The mechanism shown provides fundamental guidance for designing manufacturing-friendly processing techniques to enable scalable nanofabrication of nanocomposite-based devices using blade coating, ink-jet printing, and dynamic zone annealing. Furthermore, the wavelength-dependent anisotropic optical properties for 3D ordered arrays of gold nanoparticles clearly demonstrated the potential and feasibility for engineering nanocomposites for light manipulation and require further in-depth investigation. The optical properties of nanocomposite thin films depend on the properties of individual nanoparticles and, equally importantly, well-defined inter-particle distance along different directions. As the supramolecular approach is compatible with nanoparticles of different chemical compositions and can lead to a library of nanoparticle assemblies, present studies clearly open a viable approach to generate a new family of optical coating for light manipulation, wave plates, optical modulators and, potentially, information transmission.


Preparation of supramolecular nanocomposite thin films

PS(19 kDa)-b-P4VP-(5.2 kDa) (PDI=1.09) was purchased from Polymer Source, Inc. 3-n-Pentadecylphenol (95%) was purchased from Acros. Chloroform was purchased from Fisher. All chemicals were used as received. The Au nanoparticles were synthesized using the method reported by Peng et al.44 Blends of supramolecules and nanoparticles were prepared as described previously. Thin films were prepared by spin-coating the mixed solutions onto silicon wafers (200 nm thermal oxide/Si) with spinning speeds ranging from 1,000 to 3,000 r.p.m. For solvent annealing, samples were annealed using CHCl3 injected inside a 250-ml Teflon chamber at room temperature. The amount of solvent injected was varied from 0.3 to 2 ml to tailor the swelling rate. The thickness of the film was monitored using Filmetrics F20 as a function of annealing time. Once the film thickness of the nanocomposite thin film reached the desired value, the chamber was opened and the CHCl3 vapour was allowed to freely evaporate.


To prepare the cross-section of a nanocomposite thin film for TEM imaging, the sample was floated off from the substrate on the surface of a pool of 5 vol% hydrogen fluoride solution. An epoxy block (Araldite 502, Electron Microscopy Sciences) was used to catch the film such that the sample is on top of the epoxy block with the air/polymer interface in contact with the epoxy block. The epoxy along with the sample were cured at 60 °C for at least 4 h to ensure good contact between the epoxy and the nanocomposite thin film. Thin sections, 50 nm in thickness, were microtomed using an RMC MT-X ultramicrotome (Boeckler Instruments) and picked up on copper TEM grids on top of water. The cross-sectional TEM images were collected using a FEI Tecnai 12 transmission electron microscope at an accelerating voltage of 120 kV.

In situ GISAXS measurements

GISAXS measurements were made at beamline 8-ID-E in Advanced Photon Source in Argonne National Laboratory. X-ray wavelength of 1.687 Å was used and the scattering spectra were collected on a Pilatus 1M detector (Pilatus) during solvent annealing at an incident angle larger than the critical angle of the Si substrate, usually around 0.25°. With CHCl3 vapour in the annealing chamber, the exposure time was chosen to be shorter than 5 s to avoid serious beam damage on the film. Line averaged intensities were reported as I versus q, where q=(4π/λ) sin(θ/2), λ is the wavelength of incident X-rays, and θ is the scattering angle.


AFM was performed on a Veeco Dimension 3100 equipped with a NanoScope IIIa controller and Quadrex signal processor. The spring constant of the cantilever was 10–130 N m−1 with a resonant frequency in the range of 250–400 kHz. The set point for autotune was 2.5 V. The set-point amplitude was 90% of the free vibration value.

Optical property measurements

Reflection ellipsometry experiment was conducted using a spectroscopic ellipsometer (M2000U, J.A. Woollam) to measure the complex refractive index of the as-cast and annealed supramolecular nanocomposite thin films (Supplementary Table 1). The white light source used had a broad spectrum of wavelength ranging from 250 to 1,000 nm. When the light source is perpendicular to the sample, the diameter of the incident light spot was around 2 mm. At incident angle 75°, the spot size increased to 6 mm in the projection direction. Biaxial model was used to retrieve the refractive index of the samples. The fitting had small mean square error (<5), which confirms the reliability of the retrieved data.

Fabrication of lithographic trench pattern

The rectangular trenches were fabricated using e-beam lithography and have average width and height around 135 and 50 nm, respectively.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Kao, J. et al. Rapid fabrication of hierarchically structured supramolecular nanocomposite thin films in 1 min. Nat. Commun. 5:4053 doi: 10.1038/ncomms5053 (2014).


  1. 1.

    , & Synthesis and characterization of nearly monodisperse CdE (E=sulfur, selenium, tellurium) semiconductor nanocrystallites. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 115, 8706–8715 (1993).

  2. 2.

    , , & Epitaxial growth of highly luminescent CdSe/CdS core/shell nanocrystals with photostability and electronic accessibility. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119, 7019–7029 (1997).

  3. 3.

    , & Synthesis of soluble and processable rod-, arrow-, teardrop-, and tetrapod-shaped CdSe nanocrystals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122, 12700–12706 (2000).

  4. 4.

    et al. Shape control of CdSe nanocrystals. Nature 404, 59–61 (2000).

  5. 5.

    et al. A novel organometallic synthesis of highly luminescent CdTe nanocrystals. J. Phys. Chem. B 105, 2260–2263 (2001).

  6. 6.

    & Shape-controlled synthesis of gold and silver nanoparticles. Science 298, 2176–2179 (2002).

  7. 7.

    , , & Localized surface plasmon resonances arising from free carriers in doped quantum dots. Nat. Mater. 10, 361–366 (2011).

  8. 8.

    & Hierarchical self-assembly of metal nanostructures on diblock copolymer scaffolds. Nature 414, 735–738 (2001).

  9. 9.

    , & Hybrid nanorod-polymer solar cells. Science 295, 2425–2427 (2002).

  10. 10.

    & PbSe nanocrystal solids for n- and p-channel thin film field-effect transistors. Science 310, 86–89 (2005).

  11. 11.

    et al. Organization of 'nanocrystal molecules' using DNA. Nature 382, 609–611 (1996).

  12. 12.

    , , & A DNA-based method for rationally assembling nanoparticles into macroscopic materials. Nature 382, 607–609 (1996).

  13. 13.

    et al. Organically modified aluminosilicate mesostructures from block copolymer phases. Science 278, 1795–1798 (1997).

  14. 14.

    , & Nanoparticle polymer composites: where two small worlds meet. Science 314, 1107–1110 (2006).

  15. 15.

    et al. Ordered mesoporous materials from metal nanoparticle–block copolymer self-assembly. Science 320, 1748–1752 (2008).

  16. 16.

    , , & Predicting the mesophases of copolymer-nanoparticle composites. Science 292, 2469–2472 (2001).

  17. 17.

    , , & Size-selective organization of enthalpic compatibilized nanocrystals in ternary block copolymer/particle mixtures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 5276–5277 (2003).

  18. 18.

    , , & Three-dimensional binary superlattices of magnetic nanocrystals and semiconductor quantum dots. Nature 423, 968–971 (2003).

  19. 19.

    , , & Control of nanoparticle location in block copolymers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 5036–5037 (2005).

  20. 20.

    et al. Self-directed self-assembly of nanoparticle/copolymer mixtures. Nature 434, 55–59 (2005).

  21. 21.

    , , , & Structural diversity in binary nanoparticle superlattices. Nature 439, 55–59 (2006).

  22. 22.

    Semiconductor Industry Association. International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (Emerging Research Materials) edn 2007 Semiconductor Industry Association: San Jose, CA, (2007).

  23. 23.

    , & Block copolymer nanocomposites: Perspectives for tailored functional materials. Adv. Mater. 17, 1331–1349 (2005).

  24. 24.

    et al. General strategies for nanoparticle dispersion. Science 311, 1740–1743 (2006).

  25. 25.

    et al. Anisotropic self-assembly of spherical polymer-grafted nanoparticles. Nat. Mater. 8, 354–359 (2009).

  26. 26.

    , , , & Fast assembly of ordered block copolymer nanostructures through microwave annealing. ACS Nano 4, 7021–7029 (2010).

  27. 27.

    et al. Directed self-assembly with sub-100 degrees celsius processing temperature, sub-10 nanometer resolution, and sub-1 minute assembly time. Small 8, 3762–3768 (2013).

  28. 28.

    et al. Small-molecule-directed nanoparticle assembly towards stimuli-responsive nanocomposites. Nat. Mater. 8, 979–985 (2009).

  29. 29.

    et al. Nanoparticle assemblies in thin films of supramolecular nanocomposites. Nano Lett. 12, 2610–2618 (2012).

  30. 30.

    & Hierarchical self-assembly in polymeric complexes: towards functional materials. Chem. Commun. 19, 2131–2137 (2004).

  31. 31.

    & An evaluation of the diffusion coefficient for chloroform in polystyrene from simple absorption experiments. Trans. Faraday Soc. 45, 240–249 (1949).

  32. 32.

    Concentration dependence of diffusion of chloroform in polystyrene. J. Polym. Sci. 5, 139–140 (1950).

  33. 33.

    , , , & Phase behavior of solvent vapor annealed thin films of PS-b-P4VP(PDP) supramolecules. Macromolecules 41, 3199–3208 (2008).

  34. 34.

    , , , & Ordering in asymmetric block copolymer films by a compressible fluid. J. Phys. Chem. B 111, 16–25 (2006).

  35. 35.

    et al. Supramolecular routes to hierarchical structures: comb-coil diblock copolymers organized with two length scales. Macromolecules 32, 1152–1158 (1999).

  36. 36.

    & Parallel and perpendicular chain diffusion in a lamellar block copolymer. Macromolecules 26, 859–861 (1993).

  37. 37.

    & Self-diffusion and tracer diffusion in sphere-forming block copolymers. Macromolecules 36, 7158–7164 (2003).

  38. 38.

    , & Effect of film thickness and domain spacing on defect densities in directed self-assembly of cylindrical morphology block copolymers. ACS Nano 6, 2629–2641 (2012).

  39. 39.

    Diffusion in strongly segregated block copolymers. Macromolecules 25, 492–493 (1992).

  40. 40.

    & Optical Properties of Metal Clusters Vol. 25, Springer: Berlin, (1995).

  41. 41.

    , & Electromagnetic energy transfer and switching in nanoparticle chain arrays below the diffraction limit. Phys. Rev. B 62, R16356–R16359 (2000).

  42. 42.

    , & Collective plasmonic modes in two-dimensional periodic arrays of metal nanoparticles. Phys. Rev. B 78, 035419 (2008).

  43. 43.

    , , , & Long-wavelength optical properties of a plasmonic crystal. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 016402 (2010).

  44. 44.

    et al. A facile synthesis of monodisperse Au nanoparticles and their catalysis of CO oxidation. Nano Res. 1, 229–234 (2008).

Download references


We thank B. Rancatore, Z. Jiang and J. Strzalka at Advanced Photon Source, and Detlef Smilgie at CHESS for their valuable inputs and assistance. In situ GISAXS experiments were first carried out at station D1 in CHESS and optimized at beamline 8-ID-E in the Advanced Photon Source. We also thank C. Ross for providing trench patterned substrates. Initial ex situ studies on the solvent annealing conditions using AFM was supported by the NSF-DMR under contract NSF-DMR-1007002. The in situ studies were supported by the Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Science under Contract DE-AC02-05CH11231 through the ‘Organic-inorganic Nanocomposites’ program at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Use of the Advanced Photon Source was supported by the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, under Contract DE-AC02-06CH1135. Optical characterization of the supramolecular nanocomposite thin films was supported by the NSF CAREER award under contract NSF-CMMI-0955195.

Author information


  1. Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-1760, USA

    • Joseph Kao
    • , Kari Thorkelsson
    • , Peter Bai
    •  & Ting Xu
  2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208-3111, USA

    • Zhen Zhang
    •  & Cheng Sun
  3. Department of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-1760, USA

    • Ting Xu
  4. Materials Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720-1760, USA

    • Ting Xu


  1. Search for Joseph Kao in:

  2. Search for Kari Thorkelsson in:

  3. Search for Peter Bai in:

  4. Search for Zhen Zhang in:

  5. Search for Cheng Sun in:

  6. Search for Ting Xu in:


T.X. and J.K. conceived the idea and designed the experiments. J.K. conducted the synthesis of nanoparticles, AFM measurements, cross-sectional TEM experiments and GISAXS data analysis. J.K., K.T. and P.B. co-designed the solvent annealing chamber, the experimental setups and carried out the in situ GISAXS measurements. C.S. and Z.Z. characterized the optical properties of the supramolecular nanocomposite thin films using ellipsometry. T.X. and J.K. co-wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the results.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ting Xu.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Figures 1-5, Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary Discussion

About this article

Publication history






By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.