Engineering p-wave interactions in ultracold atoms using nanoplasmonic traps


Engineering strong p-wave interactions between fermions is one of the challenges in modern quantum physics. Such interactions are responsible for a plethora of fascinating quantum phenomena, such as topological quantum liquids and exotic superconductors. Here we propose a method to generate these fermionic interactions by combining recent developments in nanoplasmonics with progress in realizing laser-induced gauge fields. Nanoplasmonics allows for strong confinement, leading to a geometric resonance in the atom–atom scattering. In combination with the laser coupling of the atomic states, this is shown to result in the desired interaction. We illustrate how this scheme can be used for the stabilization of strongly correlated fractional quantum Hall states in ultracold fermionic gases.


Recently, there has been growing interest in plasmonic nanostructures that can be used for various applications in quantum optics and atomic physics1,2,3,4,5,6,7. Of particular interest is the possibility of confining atomic motion over regions in space of order of nanometres, comparable or smaller than typical values of the atom–atom scattering length. In such a regime, atomic scattering undergoes strong modifications due to confinement-induced resonances8,9,10.

Experimental difficulties to provide transverse confinement on the order of the atom–atom scattering length are surmountable, thanks to the new developments in plasmonics. A notable feature of surface-plasmon excitations, which exist along a metal–dielectric interface, is the lack of a diffraction limit. In the context of atom trapping, this enables the generation of fields with dramatically reduced effective wavelengths compared with free space, and a corresponding reduction of parameters, such as trap confinement. The properties of the plasmons can also be greatly engineered through the underlying device geometry. The interaction between Bose–Einstein condensates and tailored plasmonic micropotentials has recently been observed3, and plasmon-based trapping techniques for ultracold atoms with applications in quantum simulation have been proposed1,2,4.

Here we propose to use nanoplasmonic trapping to engineer strong and robust p-wave interactions between fermionic atoms in planar geometries, which overcomes the challenges associated with creating such interactions with previously proposed techniques. This opens a new path towards the realization of exotic fractional quantum Hall states11,12 and superfluid phases13,14. A strong motivation for realizing such states are their intriguing topological properties, which find direct application in topological quantum computation, protected quantum qubits and protected quantum memories15. Similarly, p-wave repulsion can stabilize low-filling fractional quantum Hall states11,16, including the Moore–Read state12. This state has been proposed in the context of a pronounced fractional quantum Hall plateau at filling 5/2 (ref. 14), but formally it also resembles the spinless chiral p-wave superfluid state. In solid-state physics, the most prominent example of p-wave superfluidity occurs in liquid 3He (refs 17, 18). Recently, also in strontium ruthenate, chiral (px+ipy)-wave Cooper pairs are believed to be responsible for the observed superfluidity of electrons19. In the field of quantum gases, strong p-wave interaction can in principle be achieved by using Feshbach resonances. Because of the inelastic loss processes, however, a strong p-wave interaction is hard to achieve experimentally20,21,22. Moreover, in Bose–Fermi mixtures, density fluctuations of bosons can induce attractive p-wave interactions or even higher partial waves between the fermions23,24,25. However, such proposals also run into difficulties due to the phase separation instability of Bose–Fermi mixtures and stringent constraints on temperature.

Here we combine two important concepts: (1) strongly confined two-dimensional (2D) traps via nanoplasmonic fields and (2) strong laser-induced synthetic gauge fields as illustrated in Fig. 1. For simplicity, the synthetic gauge field is produced through a minimal scheme described in ref. 26. It consists of a laser field, coupling two internal levels of the fermionic atoms, and an external electric or magnetic field, which produces a linear variation of the energy of the internal states throughout the sample. Preparing the system in the lower-dressed state, the sample is effectively subjected to a strong synthetic magnetic field27. Being polarized in one dressed state, interactions between the fermionic atoms are prohibited by the Pauli principle. However, the external degrees of freedom provide a small coupling to the higher-dressed state. Remarkably, this will be shown to result in a residual p-wave contact interaction between the fermions, analogous to the synthetic higher partial waves reported in ref. 28. This contribution can be enhanced, thanks to the resonant behaviour of the atom–atom scattering length in strongly confined 2D settings9,10 as demonstrated recently in ultracold atomic systems29,30,31. This not only allows to strengthen the interaction but also to explore both attractive and repulsive p-wave interactions, that is, going from the physics of p-wave pairing to fractional quantum Hall physics. As a straightforward application of the scheme, we will consider the case of repulsive interactions and show by exact diagonalization how the induced p-wave interaction can be used to explore different quantum Hall phases, notably going from filled Landau level (LL) physics to the fractional quantum Hall regime with a ν=1/3 Laughlin state11, passing through a phase with sizable overlap with the Pfaffian state12.

Figure 1: Schematic depiction of the proposed setup.

The ultracold atomic sample is tightly confined above a metallic surface as explained in detail in the Methods section. A laser beam (in blue), shining in from the side, is used to generate the artificial magnetic field felt by the atoms. The mechanism for fermion–fermion contact interaction involves the virtual excitation of one of the atoms into the excited dressed state, as illustrated in the inset.


Generation of the artificial magnetic field

We consider a trapped ultracold gas of fermionic atoms with two internal states |g,|e. The single-particle Hamiltonian Hsp=Hext+HAL consists of an external part Hext=p2/(2M)+V(r) with the anisotropic trapping potential V(r) and an atom–laser coupling HAL, including also the internal energies. This coupling is responsible for a synthetic gauge field, which emerges due to the accumulation of Berry’s geometrical phase when an atom moves within the laser field32. The key to achieve non-vanishing phases on closed contours is to make the internal energies, and thus HAL, spatially dependent via a Stark or Zeeman shift, such that HAL and Hext do not commute (see Methods).

The laser light mixes the ground and excited state, giving rise to position-dependent dressed states, |Ψ1 and |Ψ2, which are the eigenstates of the atom–laser interaction (see Methods section for their explicit form). As detailed in the Methods section, increasing the laser strength, and thus the Rabi coupling between the two bare states, one can energetically favour one dressed manifold, say |Ψ2. By adjusting the external trapping, the single-particle Hamiltonian projected in this lowest dressed manifold can be written as the usual quantum Hall one,

where ω is the effective xy trapping frequency, where and η is the strength of the synthetic gauge field, which depends on the laser wavenumber k and the spatial extent of the Stark or Zeeman shift w (see Methods). This Hamiltonian has the well-known LL structure, and its eigenfunctions are the Fock–Darwin states. Restricting ourselves to the lowest LL, the corresponding wave functions read where z=xiy describes the atom position in the (x, y) plane. The adiabatic approximation requires large Rabi frequencies ħΩ0>>ER (ref. 27), where the recoil energy is . Within this limit, the off-diagonal Hamiltonian elements, H12 and H21, connecting the dressed states are neglected. The explicit expression for H12 is provided in the Methods section. Then, transitions to the higher-dressed manifold are fully suppressed. A general atomic state, becomes a low-lying solution for and . In our approach, however, some amount of non-adiabaticity is crucial, as it will yield a finite value for resulting in non-zero contact interactions.

p-wave fermion–fermion interaction

Now we turn to the atom–atom interactions, which we take as contact interactions. In terms of the bare fermionic states, it reads

Here gc is a number quantifying the interaction strength. A more precise definition will be given later. Of course, in the dressed basis the interaction term maintains its form such that interactions remain restricted to pairs of one atom in |Ψ1 and the other in |Ψ2. Thus, by polarizing the system in the lower-dressed state |Ψ2, no interactions are present in the adiabatic limit Ω0→∞. Still, by making the ratio of the Rabi frequency to recoil energy much bigger than 1, RE≡ħΩ0/ER>>1, we can work in a quasi-polarized regime in which the |Ψ1 level serves only as a virtual manifold.

In this limit, the unperturbed many-body Hamiltonian is given by

where the operator Pi=|Ψ2iΨ2|i projects the ith particle onto the low-lying Hilbert space. The off-diagonal terms, H121Ψ2| and H212Ψ1|, and the atom–atom interaction of equation (2) are taken as perturbations. They give second-order corrections. The effective many-body Hamiltonian can then be written as

Note that the denominator in H(1) has been set to a constant equaling the energy difference between dressed states |Ψ2 and |Ψ1. As this is taken to be large, it is the dominant contribution to the energy gap.

In a previous study of a bosonic system27,33 we have analysed the influence of H(1), but the many-body contribution H(2) has been negligible because of the bosonic nature of the atoms. We will, in the following, show that in the fermionic case, where H(2) is the only many-body contribution, it becomes crucial. As illustrated in Fig. 1, H(2) describes a process where one atom is excited from |Ψ2 to the virtual |Ψ1 manifold, where it interacts with an atom in |Ψ2, to then get de-excited to |Ψ2 again. Importantly, acting among fermions the many-body interaction term gives solely non-zero p-wave contributions. This is seen by using equation (15) to cast H(2) into p-wave form (cf. ref. 16),

with the relative variables, and zij=zizj. The important feature of equation (4) is that the effective interaction is linear in the bare one, Vij, which allows one to change the interaction from attractive to repulsive. This is in contrast to second-order mechanisms like the Kohn–Luttinger34.

The question that arises at this point is whether the interaction term, equation (5), is strong enough to significantly modify the physics of the system. This becomes possible by tuning the interaction strength gc. It is well known that this parameter crucially depends on the geometry of the system. In particular, for transversal confinements of the order of the scattering length, and considering the case of attractive interaction the effective 2D coupling is known to behave as9,35

where ε is the energy of the motion in the xy plane and a3D the 3D (three-dimensional) scattering length. For a value of ħωz/ε=103, it produces a resonant behaviour for values of the transverse confinement λz~0.4|a3D|. Such confinement-induced resonance behaviour has been observed in experiments with optical traps by increasing the scattering length by means of Feshbach resonances29,30,31. This procedure, in particular if an optical Feshbach resonance is involved, suffers from severe loss processes. Approaching the shape resonance by decreasing the confinement length should minimize losses to the inevitable ones due to inelastic scattering of two particles. A candidate species for the gauge field proposal is ytterbium with narrow 1S→3P transitions. In this case, the loss rates for inelastic scattering between 1S0 and 3P2 can be minimized if spin-changing collisions are avoided by choosing the m=−2 hyperfine state36. With optical traps, the trapping on the z direction is usually of the order of hundreds of nanometres far from the resonance region.

Nanoplasmonic trap properties

The transverse confinement lengths of λz~5–10 nm needed to facilitate significant interactions can be achieved using novel plasmon-based trapping techniques, such as those investigated theoretically and experimentally in refs 1, 2, 3, 4. In the following, we present a detailed rendition of a hybrid plasmonic trap formed near a metal–vacuum interface. The stable trapping potential is formed by the combination of attractive Casimir–Polder forces (see Methods) and a repulsive barrier formed by blue-detuned surface plasmons (see Methods) guided along the interface. Below we show how this scheme can produce a transversal confinement of ~10 nm for a realistic implementation in the appropriate range to hit the confinement-induced resonance. This resonant behaviour can in principle be used to produce large values of gc and, importantly, also provides a way of producing both attractive and repulsive p-wave interactions between the fermions.

Specifically, we consider surface plasmons propagating along an interface (at z=0) between vacuum (z>0) and a metallic slab (z<0), as illustrated in Fig. 4a. We assume that the surface plasmons are driven at frequency ωL>ωeg, where ωeg is the frequency of the atomic trapping transition. In this case, an atom near the surface experiences an optical dipole potential of the form , where corresponds to the transverse confinement length of the evanescent surface-plasmon field (see Methods). Here Ω is the corresponding Rabi frequency of the surface-plasmon field at the surface, and Δ=ωLωeg is the field detuning. Here we have assumed that Δ>>Ω, Γ, where Γ is the surface-modified excited state spontaneous emission rate. For positive detuning, the atom is repelled from the surface. In combination with the attractive Casimir–Polder potential (see Methods), the atom sees a total potential

 In certain parameter regimes, this can exhibit a meta-stable trapping potential, as illustrated in Fig. 2, with the position of the local trap minimum given by zt. The presence of the optical field also gives rise to spontaneous photon scattering, at a surface-modified rate . As in conventional optical dipole traps, the effects of spontaneous scattering can be reduced by operating at large detunings and large intensities, as the scattering rate decreases with detuning at a higher rate than the optical dipole potential.

Figure 2: Nanoplasmonic trapping potential.

Total potential U(z) (solid black curve), seen by the atom, versus distance to the metal interface. The contributions of the vacuum force (dashed curve) and of the repulsive plasmonic barrier (dotted) are also shown. The red curve depicts the ground-state wave function of the trap (in arbitrary units), which for the chosen parameters is localized to Δz=10 nm.

In the case of a plasmonic trap, the maximum detunings and intensities will in practice be dictated by residual optical absorption and the subsequent material heating. Specifically, the imaginary part of the material electric permittivity ε(ω) gives rise to a local energy absorption per unit volume and per unit time, , where E2 is the electric field of the surface plasmons in the metal. Given the tight localization of the surface plasmons near the surface, we can approximate the heating as a delta function source, where accounts for the total energy absorption per unit area and per unit time in the metal. The temperature rise of the metal is then governed by the heat equation including the source, . Here cV is the heat capacity of the metal per unit volume and α is the thermal diffusivity. Assuming that the trap is turned on at t=0, the maximum temperature increase (which occurs at the interface z=0) is given by

As a specific example, we consider the trapping of Yb atoms using the strong 6 s2-6s6p transition, which has a resonant wavelength of λ0=399 nm and a spontaneous emission rate of Γ0=2π × 29 MHz. We use a Drude model for the optical response of the metal, where ωp and γ describe the plasma frequency and dissipation rate, respectively. We take material parameters of α=1.66 × 10−4 m2 s−1, cV=2.44 × 106 J m−3 K−1 and , which correspond closely to silver. Note that choosing a particular material fixes the plasmon frequency, whereas ideally this should be a tunable parameter (such that the laser detuning Δ and surface-plasmon wavelength can be independently tuned). It is well known that changing the material geometry from the thick membrane considered here enables such tuning. To facilitate theoretical analysis, however, we restrict ourselves to the case of a thick membrane and assume that ωp is variable.

As described above, we specifically target trap parameters such that the ground-state wave function of the trap has a position uncertainty of Δz<10 nm, with the maximum possible detunings and intensities to minimize spontaneous photon scattering and before heating of the material becomes important on time scales relevant to the experiment. In the case of the parameters above, we find that this can be achieved by choosing atom-trapping parameters Ω/Γ0~3 × 103 and Δ/Γ0~5 × 105, and material parameter (yielding a surface-plasmon wavelength of λSP~120 nm). The trapping potential for these parameters, along with the ground-state wave function, is illustrated in Fig. 2. For these parameters, we find a scattering rate of Rsc~2π × 3 Hz, a ground-state uncertainty of Δx~10 nm and the trap potential minimum located at zt=70 nm from the metal surface. For these parameters, the trap can be sustained for approximately t~100 ms without adverse effects from material absorption and heating.

Stabilization of the ν=1/3 Laughlin state

As an example, we discuss the case of repulsive p-wave interaction. In the context of quantum Hall physics we have to ask whether the obtained p-wave interaction is capable of bringing the system from the integer quantum Hall regime of a non-interacting system to the fractional quantum Hall regime. In that case, a Laughlin-like state should show up as the ground state of the system. Let us recall the Laughlin wave function11 at filling ν,

which has well-defined z component of the angular momentum operator , where Lz=ν−1N(N−1)/2. Note that in the quantum Hall regime, η→1, the contribution of H22 reduces to a constant, as all Fock–Darwin states become (quasi)degenerate. Thus, to bring the system into the fractional quantum Hall regime the interaction term must be comparable to the contribution of the H(1) term, which breaks the rotational symmetry33.

To give definite numerical predictions, we perform an exact diagonalization (see Methods) with a few number of atoms, N=4. The parameters of the system are taken as k=10/λ, ħΩ0=100ER and η=0.98. We discuss the different phases appearing as we vary the interaction strength, gc. For weak interactions, the ground state of the system has a large overlap with the analytical form of the filled LL state, ν=1, as depicted in Fig. 3. The angular momentum of the ground state is found to be slightly larger than the analytical value, L=6. As explained in refs 27 and 33, this is due to the deviation from rotational symmetry. When the interaction is increased, the system undergoes a transition into a phase, where the ground state has large overlaps with the fermionic Moore–Read state12. Even stronger interactions bring the system into a state, which resembles the quasiparticle excitation of the ν=1/3 Laughlin state. At another critical value of gc, one finally reaches a ν=1/3 Laughlin-like state. In particular, as shown in ref. 27, despite the broken rotational symmetry, this state still possesses the typical features of the Laughlin states, namely strong anticorrelations exhibited in the pair-correlation function, in contrast to an almost homogeneous density. As in the case of bosons with contact interactions, these anticorrelations make it a state of zero interaction energy, and thus no more transitions take place when further increasing the interaction parameter. These properties can be used for an experimental detection of the phases and strongly influence also the dynamical behaviour of the system as discussed in ref. 37.

Figure 3: Many-body quantum phases.

Evolution of the ground state as a function of the interaction parameter . (a) The overlap fidelity, |Ψtargetgs| of the ground state with the filled LL state (solid black), the fermionic Pfaffian state (dotted red), the quasiparticle state over the ν=1/3 Laughlin (dashed orange) and the ν=1/3 Laughlin (long-dashed blue). (b) The average angular momentum of the ground state of the system.


We have presented a novel mechanism to realize sizable p-wave interactions between fermionic atoms. The key is the combination of a strongly confining plasmonic field, which allows to explore confinement-induced resonances, with a simple scheme to generate a strong synthetic gauge field. To exemplify the potential of our approach, we have considered the case of repulsive p-wave interaction. We have shown that our proposal allows to stabilize a number of interesting quantum Hall states, such as the Pfaffian, and the ν=1/3 Laughlin state. In our numerical calculation we have considered a small number of atoms, as it has become experimentally feasible recently38,39,40, but we note that the scheme should also be applicable to large systems. A good candidate for realizing the proposal are ytterbium atoms due to the long-lived state of the clock transition. Requiring an ultratight trapping in a 2D geometry, our proposal shall trigger the use of nanoplasmonic fields as a promising technique for achieving that goal.


Single-particle Hamiltonian

The single-particle Hamiltonian reads

where Hext=p2/(2M)+V(r) with the anisotropic trapping potential V(r). HAL is the atom–laser coupling, which includes the internal energies. To make HAL spatially dependent, such that HAL and Hext do not commute, we perform a Stark or Zeeman shift of the internal energies. The strength of this shift can be characterized by a length scale w, which is chosen such that the energies of the bare internal states read Eg=−ħΩ0x/(2w) and EeωA+ħΩ0x/(2w). Here, ωA is the energy difference of the bare states. In this way, preparing the system in the ground state of HAL, the external part will stimulate transitions into the excited manifold of HAL. The probability of such transitions is controlled by the Rabi frequency Ω0 of the coupling. The laser frequency is set to resonance with the atomic transition. Furthermore, we choose the laser to be a running wave in y direction with wavenumber k. Then, within the rotating-wave approximation, the atom–laser Hamiltonian HAL can be written in terms of bare states | e and | g as41

where , tan θ=w/x, and φ=ky. Note that spontaneous emission processes are not considered in the Hamiltonian of equation (11). This is justified if the two atomic states are sufficiently long-lived, as is the case for the 1S03P0 clock transition in ytterbium. In contrast to the bosonic ytterbium isotopes, the finite spin of the fermionic isotopes yields a small magnetic moment, which allows for a strong coupling of the clock states at reasonable laser power. Thus, achieving large Rabi frequencies, as required by our proposal, poses no problem for 171,173Yb (ref. 42).

Diagonalizing equation (11) yields the dressed states, |Ψ1=eiG(Ce/2|g+Se/2| e), |Ψ2=eiG(−Se/2| g+Ce/2| e), where C=cos θ/2, S=sin θ/2, . The single-particle Hamiltonian Hsp can be expressed as a 2 × 2 matrix Hij. In the dressed-state basis, its diagonal terms can be written as27

with ε1=1 and ε2=−1. Full expressions for the vector potential A and the scalar potential U are given in ref. 27. Note that for w<<x, y, we recover the symmetric gauge expression . With a convenient choice of the trapping potential, H22 can be made symmetric with respect to rotations around the z-axis. Then, the Hamiltonian element H22 reads

where ω is the effective xy trapping frequency, and . The recoil energy of the atoms is defined as .

Retaining up to quadratic terms, the off-diagonal Hamiltonian elements, explicitly read

with , , and . Acting on a Fock–Darwin state, the operators () decrease (increase) the l quantum number by one, whereas the operators and change the LL.

As we will be interested in the fractional quantum Hall regime of large synthetic magnetic field, , it is possible to safely neglect the and contributions. In this limit, we have and . In our numerics, we will furthermore choose and k=10/λ, implying , guaranteeing c1<<c3. We can then write

Exact diagonalization

To solve the effective Hamiltonian, we performed exact diagonalization. Therefore, we build many-body states using as single-particle states the Fock–Darwin states, |l. Then, the second quantized form of H(2) is

where anihilates an atom in . The matrix element reads, Vij,kl=(ħΩ0)−2i|j|H21VH12|l|k. Taking into account the Pauli principle, we get

where . With the expression for H12 from equation (15), hl is directly found to be It is worth noting that due to the contact nature of the interaction, equation (16) commutes with .

Casimir–Polder potential

Here we provide a heuristic derivation of the Casimir–Polder potential for an atom in its electronic ground state, while referring the reader to ref. 43 for details. Working within a two-level approximation with atomic ground and excited states |g,|e, the interaction between the electromagnetic field and an atom at position r is given by the dipole Hamiltonian H=−d.E(r). Following a complete decomposition of the electric field into its normal modes k, one can write . Here gk are the vacuum Rabi coupling strengths between the atom and mode k, and σij=|ij| are operators acting on the atomic internal states. The non-rotating terms of this Hamiltonian enable an atom in its ground state |g,0 to couple virtually to the excited state and create a photon, |e,1k. The corresponding frequency shift for the ground state within second-order perturbation theory due to these quantum fluctuations is . This shift results in a position-dependent mechanical potential for the atom when translational symmetry is broken due to dielectric surfaces.

A quantization scheme of the electromagnetic field in the presence of dielectrics in fact allows this expression involving the summation of modes to be conveniently rewritten in terms of the (classical) dyadic electromagnetic Green’s function evaluated at imaginary frequencies ω=iu,

Here Γ0 is the free-space spontaneous emission rate of the atom. The Green’s function is defined through the relation

The shift δωg(r) is independent of the hyperfine or magnetic sublevel of the ground-state atom.

As an example system, we consider the metal–vacuum interface shown in Fig. 4a. We treat the dielectric function of the metal as a Drude response, . Here ωp and γ characterize the plasma frequency and dissipation rate of the material, respectively. This dielectric function is a good approximation for metals, such as silver and gold. For atomic distances to the surface z<<λ0 that are much closer than the atomic resonant wavelength λ0, and for an atomic frequency comparable to the plasmon resonance frequency (where ε=−1), , equation (18) can be evaluated in the near field,

Figure 4: Plasmon illustration.

(a) A metal–vacuum interface (here, with interface located in the z=0 plane) supports guided surface-plasmon modes. These surface plasmons are a combined excitation of a charge density wave localized near the surface and an electromagnetic field (electric field lines depicted in red). The surface-plasmon wavelength λSP and the transverse confinement of the mode can be reduced far below the free-space wavelength λ0 for frequencies where ε(ω)→−1. (b) Blue curve: surface-plasmon dispersion relation, ω versus kx, in the case of the lossless Drude model . The diagonal dashed line indicates the free-space dispersion ω=ck, whereas the horizontal line indicates the plasmon resonance frequency above which the the surface-plasmon modes are cut off.

where k0=2π/λ0 is the resonant free-space wave vector. Although this asymptotic scaling is convenient to understand the trap properties, in numerical solutions presented later, equation (18) is evaluated exactly.

In addition to the Casimir–Polder shifts, the metallic interface can also give rise to a modification of the excited-state spontaneous emission rate. Under weak driving by a laser of frequency ωL, a similar calculation shows that the effective spontaneous emission rate is given by

Here the emission rate depends only on the Green’s function evaluated at the laser frequency, which reflects the interaction between the atom and its Rayleigh emission reflected from the metallic interface.

Surface plasmons

Surface plasmons are polaritonic excitations of an electromagnetic field and a charge density wave, which propagate along the surface of a metal–dielectric interface. Here we specifically consider surface-plasmon excitations at the metal–vacuum interface depicted in Fig. 4(a). On the vacuum (i=1) and metal (i=2) sides, the electric fields are given by

where and . Here, without loss of generality, we have considered excitations in the xz plane. Enforcing proper boundary conditions of the field at the metal–vacuum interface, z=0, yields the dispersion relation for the surface plasmons

and t=−kz/qz. It can be seen that as ε→−1, the in-plane wave vector kx diverges, leading to a very short surface-plasmon wavelength λSP≡2π/kx. It also follows that the perpendicular component kziκz becomes large and imaginary, implying that the surface plasmons are tightly confined to the interface in the transverse direction. For the Drude model, this tight confinement occurs at frequencies near as illustrated in Fig. 4b.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Juliá-Díaz, B. et al. Engineering p-wave interactions in ultracold atoms using nanoplasmonic traps. Nat. Commun. 4:2046 doi: 10.1038/ncomms3046 (2012).


  1. 1

    Chang, D. E. et al. Trapping and manipulation of isolated atoms using nanoscale plasmonic structures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 123004 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Murphy, B. & Hau, L. V. Electro-optical nanotraps for neutral atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 033003 (2009).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Stehle, C. Bender, H. Zimmermann, C. Kern, D. Fleischer, M. & Slama, S. Plasmonically tailored micropotentials for ultracold atoms. Nat. Photon. 5, 494–498 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Gullans, M. et al. Nanoplasmonic lattices for ultracold atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 235309 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Chang, D. E. Sørenson, A. S. Demler, E. A. & Lukin, M. D. A single-photon transistor using nanoscale surface plasmons. Nat. Phys. 3, 807–812 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Akimov, A. V. et al. Generation of single optical plasmons in metallic nanowires coupled to quantum dots. Nature 450, 402–406 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Kolesov, R. et al. Wave particle duality of single surface plasmon polaritons. Nat. Phys. 5, 470–474 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Olshanii, M. Atomic scattering in the presence of an external confinement and a gas of impenetrable bosons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 938 (1998).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Petrov, D. S. Holzmann, M. & Shlyapnikov, G. V. Bose-Einstein condensation in quasi-2D trapped gases. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2551–2555 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Petrov, D. S. Gangardt, D. M. & Shlyapnikov, G. V. Low-dimensional trapped gases. J. Phys, IV France 116, 3–44 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Laughlin, R. B. Anomalous quantum Hall effect: an incompressible quantum fluid with fractionally charged excitations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1395–1398 (1983).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Moore, G. & Read, N. Nonabelions in the fractional quantum Hall effect. Nucl. Phys. B 360, 362–396 (1991).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Read, N. & Green, D. Paired states of fermions in two dimensions with breaking of parity and time-reversal symmetries and the fractional quantum Hall effect. Phys. Rev. B 61, 10267–10297 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Read, N. Non-Abelian adiabatic statistics and Hall viscosity in quantum Hall states and p x+ip y paired superfluids. Phys. Rev. B 79, 045308 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Nayak, C. Simon, S. H. Stern, A. Freedman, M. & Das Sarma, S. Non-Abelian anyons and topological quantum computation. Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1083–1159 (2008).

    ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Regnault, N. & Jolicoeur, T. Quantum Hall fractions in ultracold fermionic vapors. Phys. Rev. B 70, 241307((R)): (2004).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Oshero, D. D. Richardson, R. C. & Lee, D. M. Evidence for a new phase of solid He3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 885–888 (1972).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Leggett, A. J. Interpretation of recent results on He3 below 3 mK: a new liquid phase? Phys. Rev. Lett. 29, 1227–1230 (1972).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Maeno, Y. Rice, T. M. & Sigrist, M. The Intriguing superconductivity of strontium ruthenate. Phys. Today 54, 42–47 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Levinsen, J. Cooper, N. R. & Gurarie, V. Stability of fermionic gases close to a p -wave Feshbach resonance. Phys. Rev. A 78, 063616 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Inada, Y. Horikoshi, M. Nakajima, S. Kuwata-Gonokami, M. Ueda, M. & Mukaiyama, T. Collisional properties of p-wave Feshbach molecules. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 100401 (2008).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Maier, R. A. W. Marzok, C. Zimmermann, C. & Courteille, P. h. W. Radio-frequency spectroscopy of 6Li p-wave molecules: towards photoemission spectroscopy of a p-wave superfluid. Phys. Rev. A 81, 064701 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Efremov, D. V. & Viverit, L. p-wave Cooper pairing of fermions in mixtures of dilute Fermi and Bose gases. Phys. Rev. B 65, 134519 (2002).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Dutta, O. & Lewenstein, M. Unconventional superfluidity of fermions in Bose-Fermi mixtures. Phys. Rev. A 81, 063608 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Massignan, P. Sanpera, A. & Lewenstein, M. Creating p-wave superfluids and topological excitations in optical lattices. Phys. Rev. A 81, 031607((R)): (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Dalibard, J. Gerbier, F. Juzeliūnas, G. & Öhberg, P. Artificial gauge potentials for neutral atoms. Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1523–1543 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Juliá-Díaz, B. et al. Strongly correlated states of a small cold-atom cloud from geometric gauge fields. Phys. Rev. A 84, 053605 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Williams, R. A. et al. Synthetic partial waves in ultracold atomic collisions. Science 335, 314–317 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Haller, E. et al. Confinement-induced resonances in low-dimensional quantum systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 153203 (2010).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Fröhlich, B. Feld, M. Vogt, E. Koschorreck, M. Zwerger, W. & Köhl, M. Radio-frequency spectroscopy of a strongly interacting two-dimensional fermi gas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 105301 (2011).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Sommer, A. T. Cheuk, L. W. Ku, M. J. H. Bakr, W. S. & Zwierlein, M. W. Evolution of fermion pairing from three to two dimensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 045302 (2012).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Berry, M. V. Quantal phase factors accompanying adiabatic changes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 392, 45–57 (1984).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Juliá-Díaz, B. Graß, T. Barberán, N. & Lewenstein, M. Fractional quantum Hall states of few bosonic atoms in artificial gauge fields. New J. Phys. 14, 055003 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Kohn, W. & Luttinger, J. M. New mechanism for superconductivity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 15, 524–526 (1965).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Bloch, I. Dalibard, J. & Zwerger, W. Many-body physics with ultracold gases. Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 885–864 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Uetake, S. Murakami, R. Doyle, J. M. & Takahashi, Y. Spin-dependent collision of ultracold metastable atoms. Phys. Rev. A 86, 032712 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Graß, T. Juliá-Díaz, B. & Lewenstein, M. Quasihole dynamics as a detection tool for quantum Hall phases. Phys. Rev. A 86, 053629 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Kinoshita, T. Wenger, T. & Weiss, D. S. A quantum Newton’s cradle. Nature 440, 900–903 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Gemelke, N. Sarajlic, E. & Chu, S. Rotating few-body atomic systems in the fractional quantum hall regime. Preprint at (2010).

  40. 40

    Serwane, F. Zürn, G. Lompe, T. Ottenstein, T. B. Wenz, A. N. & Jochim, S. Deterministic preparation of a tunable few-fermion system. Science 332, 336–338 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41

    Cohen-Tannoudji, C. Dupont-Roc, J. & Grynberg, G. Atom-Photon Interactions Wiley: New York, (1992).

  42. 42

    Kitagawa, M. et al. Two-color photoassociation spectroscopy of ytterbium atoms and the precise determinations of s-wave scattering lengths. Phys. Rev. A 77, 012719 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43

    Buhmann, S. Y. Knoll, L. Welsch, D.-G. & Dung, H. T. Casimir-Polder forces: A nonperturbative approach. Phys. Rev. A 70, 052117 (2004).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


B.J.D. and T.G. are grateful for stimulating discussions with the “Ytterbium team” at ILP (Hamburg), C. Becker, S. Dörscher, B. Hundt and A. Thobe. We thank M. Koschorreck for helpful correspondence. This work has been supported by EU (SIQS, AQUTE), ERC (QUAGATUA), Spanish MINCIN (FIS2008-00784 TOQATA), Generalitat de Catalunya (2009-SGR1289), Alexander von Humboldt Stiftung and AAII-Hubbard. B.J.D. is supported by the Ramón y Cajal programme. M.L. acknowledges support from the Joachim Herz Foundation and Hamburg University. D.E.C. acknowledges support from Fundació Privada Cellex Barcelona.

Author information




B.J.-D., T.G., O.D., D.E.C and M.L. conceived the idea, performed derivations and calculations, discussed the results and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Juliá-Díaz.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Juliá-Díaz, B., Graß, T., Dutta, O. et al. Engineering p-wave interactions in ultracold atoms using nanoplasmonic traps. Nat Commun 4, 2046 (2013).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.