Abstract
Solidstate spin systems such as nitrogenvacancy colour centres in diamond are promising for applications of quantum information, sensing and metrology. However, a key challenge for such solidstate systems is to realize a spin coherence time that is much longer than the time for quantum spin manipulation protocols. Here we demonstrate an improvement of more than two orders of magnitude in the spin coherence time (T_{2}) of nitrogenvacancy centres compared with previous measurements: T_{2}≈0.6 s at 77 K. We employed dynamical decoupling pulse sequences to suppress nitrogenvacancy spin decoherence, and found that T_{2} is limited to approximately half of the longitudinal spin relaxation time over a wide range of temperatures, which we attribute to phononinduced decoherence. Our results apply to ensembles of nitrogenvacancy spins, and thus could advance quantum sensing, enable squeezing and manybody entanglement, and open a path to simulating driven, interactiondominated quantum manybody Hamiltonians.
Introduction
In recent years, the electronic spin of the negatively charged nitrogenvacancy (NV) colour centre in diamond has become a leading platform for applications ranging from quantum information processing^{1} to quantum sensing and metrology^{2,3,4}. Importantly, the NV spinstate can be optically initialized and detected on a timescale of ~300 ns (^{5}) and coherently driven at up to gigahertz rates^{5}. Single NV centres in isotopically engineered highpurity diamond can possess long electronic spin coherence times on the order of a few millisecond at room temperature^{6}. By applying dynamical decoupling sequences, similar coherence times can be achieved for single NV centres^{7,8,9} and NV ensembles^{10} in diamond containing higher impurity concentration.
Here we apply dynamical decoupling techniques to ensembles of NV centres over a range of temperatures (77 K–300 K) in order to suppress both decoherence^{10} and phononic spin relaxation^{11}. We demonstrate an extension of the NV spin coherence time (T_{2}) to T_{2}≈0.6 s at 77 K, which corresponds to an improvement of more than two orders of magnitude compared with previous measurements^{6,10} and is on par with the longest coherence times achieved for electronic spins in any solidstate system^{12}. Over a wide range of temperatures we also find that the NV spin T_{2} is limited to approximately half of the longitudinal spin relaxation time (T_{1}), T_{2}≈0.5T_{1}, a finding that could be relevant to other solidstate spin defects (such as P donors in Si). The present result of NV T_{2} approaching 1 s, in combination with single NV optical addressability and the practicality and scalability of diamond, advance NV centres to the forefront of candidates for quantum information, simulation and sensing applications^{1,2}.
Results
Coherence decay and longitudinal relaxation
As an example of our data, we plot in Fig. 1 the measured NV spin coherence as a function of time for CarrPurcellMeiboomGill (CPMG) pulse sequences^{13} with different numbers of pulses n, at room temperature T=300 K (a) and at T=160 K (b), for an isotopically pure (0.01% ^{13}C) diamond sample with nitrogen density ~10^{15} cm^{−3} and NV density ~3 × 10^{12} cm^{−3} (see Methods section for details). For each of these decoherence curves, we extracted T_{2} by fitting the data to a stretched exponential function , where the p parameter is related to the dynamics of the spin environment and inhomogeneous broadening due to ensemble averaging^{14}. For both temperatures T_{2} increases with the number of pulses in the CPMG sequence and is limited to about half of T_{1}: at 300 K, T_{2}=3.3(4) ms and T_{1}=6.0(4) ms; and at 160 K, T_{2}=40(8) ms and T_{1}=77(5) ms.
Coherence versus number of pulses at different temperatures
Figure 2a summarizes the measured dependence of T_{2} on the number of CPMG pulses n for several temperatures ranging from liquidnitrogen temperature (77 K) to room temperature (300 K). Notably, at liquid nitrogen temperature, an 8192pulse CPMG sequence achieved a coherence time of T_{2}=580 ms, which is more than two orders of magnitude longer than previous NV T_{2} measurements^{6,10}. Accumulated pulse errors limited sequences with larger n. At T=160 K, a temperature that can be reached using thermoelectric cooling rather than cryogenic fluids, we found T_{2}=40(8) ms, which is an order of magnitude longer than any previous NV T_{2} measurement. Thus, combined dynamical decoupling and thermoelectric cooling provides a practical way to greatly increase the NV spin coherence time, which could benefit many applications of NV ensembles, for example, precision magnetometry^{10} and rotation sensing^{15,16}.
The CPMG pulse sequence used here is quite robust against noise (for example, external magnetic field fluctuations) and pulse errors, allowing us to apply thousands of pulses. This robustness allows us to extract a nearideal limit to the coherence time T_{2} achievable with perfect pulses, although it is obtained only for one specific spin component. The other transverse spin component is more sensitive to pulse errors and has a shorter decay time, which can be improved to T_{2} with more optimal pulses and symmetrized pulse sequences (such as XY). The longitudinal spin component is unaffected by these pulse errors and decays with a timescale given by T_{1}. We note that the measurement scheme that we use (see Methods) allows for commonmode rejection of noise, but does not remove the effect of pulse errors. We noticed a modest reduction in signal contrast and increased noise for pulse sequences of ~10,000 pulses or more (Fig. 3). The resulting reduction in signaltonoise, together with the long integration times needed, currently prevents us from increasing the coherence time to beyond ≈0.6 s (see Methods for additional technical details). In future work, we will address these issues using various approaches, including more robust composite pulses^{17} that could be better suited to manipulate an inhomogeneously broadened ensemble. This will allow the long coherence times demonstrated here to be employed for enhanced spin sensing and quantum information processing.
Relationship between maximal coherence and relaxation times
The T_{1} relaxation time measured for each temperature is also indicated in Fig. 2a (except for 77 K, which had T_{1}>10 s). In the figure inset, we plot the maximum T_{2} achieved vs. T_{1} at each temperature in the interval of 160–300 K and find , which differs starkly from the previously expected T_{2} limit of 2T_{1} (^{9}). Under the assumption that spin–phonon coupling only causes spin–lattice relaxation (T_{1}), one cannot recover the measured T_{2}≈0.5T_{1} limit, even taking into account the possibility of unequal relaxation rates between the three groundstate NV spin sublevels. This can be seen by assuming that only statechanging relaxation processes exist and, therefore, the decoherence rate between two states a› and b›, , is given by^{18}
where is the transition rate from state m› to state n›. Solving rate equations allows one to calculate the measured relaxation rate (γ_{1}=1/T_{1}) as a function of these transition rates, and thus compare it with the decoherence rate (γ_{2}=1/T_{2}) given by Equation (1). Through this approach one can show that for a twolevel system, at temperatures ranging from zero to infinite temperature, the relation is always T_{2}=2T_{1}. For three or more levels the coefficient changes, but the general statement T_{2}>T_{1} holds (see Supplementary Methods for further details). Therefore we conclude that in our case, as we measure T_{2}<T_{1}, spin–phonon coupling contributes directly and significantly to NV spin decoherence^{19}. Such phononinduced decoherence is generally relevant to any quantum system in which transitions between two levels can be driven by a twophonon (Raman) process^{11}, and could have a role in the coherence properties of many other solidstate defects. At lower temperatures, to be studied in future work, spin–spin interactions should dominate both T_{1} and T_{2}, and thus we expect will deviate from the ≈0.5T_{1} limit demonstrated here (see Supplementary Methods).
Discussion
It is evident from Fig. 2a that the scaling of the coherence time with the number of CPMG pulses varies with temperature. In order to study the scaling behaviour of the ‘pure’ spinenvironmentinduced decoherence, we subtracted from the measured decoherence rate the temperature dependent phononic rate 1/[0.53(2)T_{1}] (see inset of Fig. 2a). The corrected coherence time is plotted against the number of CPMG pulses n in Fig. 2b, exhibiting striking universal behaviour for all temperatures. We fit the corrected data to a power law scaling, and find . This value is consistent with the expected scaling power of 2/3 for a Lorentzian noise spectrum of an electronic spin bath^{14,20}.
Even though our measurements were performed on an isotopically pure sample (0.01% ^{13}C), we expect that similar results can be obtained for natural abundance diamond (1.1% ^{13}C), as the dynamical decoupling sequences we employ are also effective in suppressing dephasing caused by the nuclear spin bath^{8,10}. However, special care must be taken in aligning the applied static magnetic field along the NV axis for natural abundance diamond since for ensembles of NVs in the presence of ^{13}C nuclear spins, additional decoherence is caused by variations in the effective Larmor frequency of nearby nuclear spins due to magnetic field misalignment^{21,22}. At present we have performed measurements on one additional sample obtaining consistent results (see Methods). From this reproducibility and the ensemble nature of our experiments, we conclude that the data presents the behaviour of typical NVs, averaged over inhomogeneous broadening effects such as strain.
The demonstrated improvement in coherence times for large ensembles of NV spins is directly relevant to enhanced metrology and magnetic field sensitivity^{23,24}, which scales as (N_{NV}T_{2})^{−1/2}, where N_{NV} is the number of sensing NVs^{2,10,25}. Thus, the hundredfold increase in T_{2} measured in this work at 77 K enables a 10fold improvement in magnetic field sensitivity. Using samples with higher densities of NVs could further improve this sensitivity; although at high NV concentrations (1 p.p.b.) the coherence time may be limited by NV–NV interactions, as CPMG pulse sequences affect the NV spin and its NV spinbath at the same time, thus cancelling the decoupling effect. Other techniques, such as WAHUHA and MREV pulse sequences^{26,27}, may be applied to address this issue.
We note that achieving long NV spin coherence times in diamond samples with high impurity concentration (~1 p.p.m.) is a crucial step towards creating nonclassical states of NV ensembles. Such nonclassical states could form the basis for highsensitivity quantum metrology, potentially allowing significantly improved sensitivity and bandwidth^{28,29}, and could also serve as a resource for quantum information protocols. To observe significant entanglement between neighbouring NV centres, their decoherence rate must be small compared with the frequency associated with their interaction. For a realistic diamond sample with [N] ~1 p.p.m. and [NV] ~10 p.p.b., coherence times larger than ~50 ms are needed for significant entanglement, which is within reach given the results presented here. For example, collective spin squeezing using oneaxis squeezing techniques^{30} could be created through application of pulse sequences that averageout the X,Y components of the spin–spin dipolar coupling^{31}. Such pulse sequences can be straightforwardly applied in conjunction with the CPMG pulse sequences used here for extending the NV spin coherence time.
In conclusion, we demonstrated more than two orders of magnitude improvement in the coherence time (T_{2}) of ensembles of NV electronic spins in diamond compared with previous results: up to T_{2}≈0.6 s by combining dynamical decoupling control sequences with cryogenic cooling to 77 K; and ms for temperatures achievable via thermoelectric cooling (>160 K). By studying the dependence of T_{2} and of the NV spin relaxation time (T_{1}) on temperature, we identified an effective limit of T_{2}≈0.5T_{1}, which we attribute to phononinduced decoherence. Given this limit, we expect that for low NV densities an electronic spin T_{2} of a few seconds should be achievable at liquidnitrogen temperatures (T=77 K).
The greatly extended NV spin coherence time presented in this work, which does not require an optimally chosen NV centre, could form the building block for wideranging applications in quantum information, sensing, and metrology in the solidstate^{32,33}. In particular, the fact that such long coherence times can be achieved with highdensity ensembles of NVs suggests that spin squeezing and highly entangled states can be created, since T_{2}>NV–NV dipolar interaction time. Finally, this work could provide a key step toward realizing interactiondominated topological quantum phases in the solidstate, as well as a large family of driven manybody quantum Hamiltonians^{34}.
Methods
NV structure
The NV centre consists of a substitutional nitrogen atom and a vacancy occupying adjacent lattice sites in the diamond crystal (Fig. 4a). The electronic ground state is a spin triplet (Fig. 4b), in which the m_{s}=0 and ±1 sublevels experience a ~2.87 GHz zerofield splitting. The NV centre can be rendered an effective twolevel system by applying a static magnetic field to further split the m_{s}=±1 states and addressing, for example, the m_{s}=0 and +1 Zeeman sublevels. The NV spin can be initialized with optical excitation, detected via the statedependent fluorescence intensity, and coherently manipulated using microwave pulse sequences^{35}.
Experimental setup
We performed measurements on an isotopically pure (0.01% ^{13}C) diamond sample (Element Six) with nitrogen density ~10^{15} cm^{−3} and NV density ~3 × 10^{12} cm^{−3}. The sample was mounted inside a continuousflow cryostat (Janis ST500) with active temperature control (Lakeshore 331). Optical excitation was done with a 532nm laser beam focused on the diamond surface through a microscope objective (NA=0.6), and the resulting NV fluorescence was collected through the same objective and directed to a multimode fibre coupled to a singlephoton counting module (PerkinElmer). The ~30 μm^{3} detection volume contained ~100 NV centres. Microwave control pulses were delivered to the NV spins using a 70μm diameter copper wire at the diamond surface. The experiments were performed in an unshielded environment.
We measured an additional, higher density isotopically pure (0.01% ^{13}C) diamond sample (Element Six), with a nitrogen density ~10^{17} cm^{−3} and NV density ~10^{15} cm^{−3}. Owing to the higher density of the sample, the coherence times achieved were consistently lower. At T=77 K with n=4,096 pulses, we obtained a coherence time of T_{2}=50(9) ms, with a scaling of the coherence time with the number of pulses of T_{2}(n)=n^{0.54(1)}.
Pulse sequences
We applied multipulse control sequences to decouple NV spins from the magnetic environment and thus extend the coherence time. Specifically, we used the CPMG pulse sequence^{13} (Fig. 4c), with a varying number n of π control pulses. It has been shown previously^{7,8,9,10} that such pulse sequences are effective in extending the coherence time T_{2} of NV spins. The coherence time increases as a power law of the number of pulses T_{2}n^{s}, where the specific scaling s is determined mainly by the spin bath surrounding the NV^{14} until spinlattice relaxation begins limiting T_{2} (assuming no pulseerror effects).
Measurement normalization schemes
The coherence measurements were performed by applying the CPMG pulse sequence with the last π/2 pulse either along the x axis or the −x axis (Fig. 4c). The two signals, labelled r_{1} and r_{2}, were then subtracted and normalized to give the measurement results m(t)=(r_{1}−r_{2})/(r_{1}+r_{2}) such that commonmode noise is rejected. The final signal m(t) is proportional to the coherence of the NV spin, defined as the magnitude of the offdiagonal density matrix element of the m_{s}=0,+1 twolevel system C(t)=Trace[ρ(t)S_{x}] (with ρ(t) being the density matrix, and S_{x} the transverse spin operator), at the end of the pulse sequence (before the final π/2 pulse). For a given pulse sequence (with n pulses), the NV spin coherence as a function of time was measured by varying the free precession time between pulses and thus the total sequence time.
Measurements of the NV longitudinal spin relaxation followed a procedure similar to that used for the coherence measurements, with one of the two ‘commonmode’ measurements initialized to m_{s}=0 (using an optical pumping pulse) and the other initialized to m_{s}=+1 (using an optical pumping pulse followed by a MW π pulse). The normalized signal is proportional to the population difference between the spin states at time t, allowing measurement of the longitudinal spin relaxation and fitting to extract the T_{1} relaxation time.
The normalized signal contrast (Fig. 3) is calculated by extracting the contrast of each decoherence curve (for example, Fig. 1) through a fit to a decaying stretched exponential (see Supplementary Methods), and then normalizing this contrast by the average contrast for all pulse sequences (at a given temperature).
Pulse errors
The effect of pulse errors is due to amplitude and timing jitter originating in our microwave source and pulse generator. One aspect of the timing jitter is related to the pulse generator timing, which includes an output jitter of ~2 ns (negligible compared with the long duration of the pulse sequences) and a timebase accuracy of ~10^{−4}. The other aspect of the timing jitter is related to the timebase of the microwave synthesizer, which has an accuracy of ~10^{−10}. Timing jitter for both the pulser and the microwave synthesizer can be improved by using an external timebase.
Additional information
How to cite this article: BarGill, N. et al. Solidstate electronic spin coherence time approaching one second. Nat. Commun. 4:1743 doi: 10.1038/ncomms2771 (2013).
References
 1
Ladd, T. et al. Quantum computers. Nature 464, 45–53 (2010) .
 2
Taylor, J. M. et al. Highsensitivity diamond magnetometer with nanoscale resolution. Nat. Phys. 4, 810–816 (2008) .
 3
Pham, L. M. et al. Magnetic field imaging with nitrogenvacancy ensembles. New J. Phys. 13, 045021 (2011) .
 4
Dolde, F., Fedder, H., Doherty, M. & Nbauer, T. Electricfield sensing using single diamond spins. Nat. Phys. 7, 459–463 (2011) .
 5
Fuchs, G. D., Dobrovitski, V. V., Toyli, D. M., Heremans, F. J. & Awschalom, D. D. Gigahertz dynamics of a strongly driven single quantum spin. Science 326, 1520–1522 (2009) .
 6
Balasubramanian, G. et al. Ultralong spin coherence time in isotopically engineered diamond. Nat. Mater. 8, 383–387 (2009) .
 7
de Lange, G., Wang, Z. H., Rist, D., Dobrovitski, V. V. & Hanson, R. Universal dynamical decoupling of a single solidstate spin from a spin bath. Science 330, 60–63 (2010) .
 8
Ryan, C. A., Hodges, J. S. & Cory, D. G. Robust decoupling techniques to extend quantum coherence in diamond. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 200402 (2010) .
 9
Naydenov, B. et al. Dynamical decoupling of a singleelectron spin at room temperature. Phys. Rev. B 83, 081201 (2011) .
 10
Pham, L. M. et al. Enhanced solidstate multispin metrology using dynamical decoupling. Phys. Rev. B 86, 045214 (2012) .
 11
Jarmola, A., Acosta, V. M., Jensen, K., Chemerisov, S. & Budker, D. Temperature and magneticfielddependent longitudinal spin relaxation in nitrogenvacancy ensembles in diamond. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 197601 (2012) .
 12
Tyryshkin, A. et al. Electron spin coherence exceeding seconds in highpurity silicon. Nat. Mater. 11, 143–147 (2012) .
 13
Meiboom, S. & Gill, D. Modified spinecho method for measuring nuclear relaxation times. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 29, 688–691 (1958) .
 14
BarGill, N. et al. Suppression of spinbath dynamics for improved coherence of multispinqubit systems. Nat. Commun. 3, 858 (2012) .
 15
Ledbetter, M. P., Jensen, K., Fischer, R., Jarmola, A. & Budker, D. Gyroscopes based on nitrogenvacancy centers in diamond. Phys. Rev. A 86, 052116 (2012) .
 16
Ajoy, A. & Cappellaro, P. Stable threeaxis nuclearspin gyroscope in diamond. Phys. Rev. A 86, 062104 (2012) .
 17
Shim, J. H., Niemeyer, I., Zhang, J. & Suter, D. Robust dynamical decoupling for arbitrary quantum states of a single NV center in diamond. Europhys. Lett. 99, 40004 (2012) .
 18
CohenTannoudji, C., DupontRoc, J. & Grynberg, G. AtomPhoton Interactions: Basic Processes and Applications John Wiley & Sons (1998) .
 19
Doherty, M. W. et al. Theory of the groundstate spin of the NV^{−} center in diamond. Phys. Rev. B 85, 205203 (2012) .
 20
de Sousa, R. in Electron Spin Resonance and Related Phenomena in LowDimensional Structures Vol. 115, (ed. Fanciulli M. 183–220Springer (2009) .
 21
Stanwix, P. L. et al. Coherence of nitrogenvacancy electronic spin ensembles in diamond. Phys. Rev. B 82, 201201Springer, (2010) .
 22
Maze, J. R., Taylor, J. M. & Lukin, M. D. Electron spin decoherence of single nitrogenvacancy defects in diamond. Phys. Rev. B 78, 094303 (2008) .
 23
Pham, L. M. et al. Enhanced metrology using preferential orientation of nitrogenvacancy centers in diamond. Phys. Rev. B 86, 121202 (2012) .
 24
Le Sage, D. et al. Efficient photon detection from color centers in a diamond optical waveguide. Phys. Rev. B 85, 121202 (2012) .
 25
Acosta, V. M. et al. Diamonds with a high density of nitrogenvacancy centers for magnetometry applications. Phys. Rev. B 80, 115202 (2009) .
 26
Waugh, J. S., Huber, L. M. & Haeberlen, U. Approach to highresolution NMR in solids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 20, 180–182 (1968) .
 27
Rhim, W.K., Elleman, D. D. & Vaughan, R. W. Analysis of multiple pulse NMR in solids. J. Chem. Phys. 59, 3740–3749 (1973) .
 28
Gross, C., Zibold, T., Nicklas, E., Estve, J. & Oberthaler, M. Nonlinear atom interferometer surpasses classical precision limit. Nature 464, 1165–1169 (2010) .
 29
Gross, C. et al. Atomic homodyne detection of continuousvariable entangled twinatom states. Nature 480, 219–223 (2011) .
 30
Kitagawa, M. & Ueda, M. Squeezed spin states. Phys. Rev. A 47, 5138–5143 (1993) .
 31
Cappellaro, P. & Lukin, M. D. Quantum correlation in disordered spin systems: applications to magnetic sensing. Phys. Rev. A 80, 032311 (2009) .
 32
van der Sar, T. et al. Decoherenceprotected quantum gates for a hybrid solidstate spin register. Nature 484, 82–86 (2012) .
 33
Maze, J. R. et al. Nanoscale magnetic sensing with an individual electronic spin in diamond. Nature 455, 644–647 (2008) .
 34
Yao, N. Y. et al. Topological flat bands from dipolar spin systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 266804 (2012) .
 35
Childress, L. et al. Coherent dynamics of coupled electron and nuclear spin qubits in diamond. Science 314, 281–285 (2006) .
Acknowledgements
This research has been supported by the DARPA QuASAR, QuEST and MURIQuISM programs, NSF, IMOD, and the NATO Science for Peace Programme. We gratefully acknowledge the provision of diamond samples by Element Six, and helpful technical discussions with Ran Fischer, Daniel Twitchen, Matthew Markham, Alastair Stacey, Keigo Arai, Chinmay Belthangady, David Glenn and David Le Sage.
Author information
Affiliations
Contributions
All authors discussed the results, analysed the data and commented on the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Correspondence to N. BarGill or R.L. Walsworth.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Figure S1 and Supplementary Methods (PDF 85 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
BarGill, N., Pham, L., Jarmola, A. et al. Solidstate electronic spin coherence time approaching one second. Nat Commun 4, 1743 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2771
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Further reading

Entanglement of two quantum memories via fibres over dozens of kilometres
Nature (2020)

SingleSpin Magnetomechanics with Levitated Micromagnets
Physical Review Letters (2020)

Coherent remote control of quantum emitters embedded in polymer waveguides
APL Photonics (2020)

Dynamical nuclear decoupling of electron spins in molecular graphenoid radicals and biradicals
Physical Review B (2020)

Spin mechanics with levitating ferromagnetic particles
Physical Review B (2020)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.