Abstract
The mobility of drops on surfaces is important in many biological and industrial processes, but the phenomena governing their adhesion, which is dictated by the morphology of the threephase contact line, remain unclear. Here we describe a technique for measuring the dynamic behaviour of the threephase contact line at micron length scales using environmental scanning electron microscopy. We examine a superhydrophobic surface on which a drop’s adhesion is governed by capillary bridges at the receding contact line. We measure the microscale receding contact angle of each bridge and show that the Gibbs criterion is satisfied at the microscale. We reveal a hitherto unknown selfsimilar depinning mechanism that shows how some hierarchical textures such as lotus leaves lead to reduced pinning, and counterintuitively, how some lead to increased pinning. We develop a model to predict adhesion force and experimentally verify the model’s broad applicability on both synthetic and natural textured surfaces.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The adhesion of liquid drops to solid substrates, whether it be the ratcheting of drops up a bird’s beak^{1} or the anisotropic wetting on butterfly wings^{2} and spider silk^{3}, is determined by the morphology of the threephase contact line^{4}. Similarly, controlling the mobility of drops and bubbles along surfaces is crucial for many industrial processes, ranging from phasechange heat transfer^{5,6,7,8} to biomedical devices^{9,10}. The dynamic behaviour of the contact line is in turn governed by surface heterogeneities that act as pinning sites to produce local deformations, ultimately leading to contact angle hysteresis and the adhesion of a macroscopic contact line^{11,12,13,14}. Recent studies have highlighted the need for a more complete picture of the contact line across multiple length scales^{15,16}. Despite their importance, dynamic imaging of these microscale deformations has been challenging and particularly elusive in the case of nonwetting drops.
Superhydrophobic surfaces utilize a combination of surface chemistry^{17} and texture to promote a Cassie–Baxter (CB) wetting state, in which the drop rests atop roughness features forming a composite interface^{18,19,20,21}. Adhesion is substantially reduced in the CB state, particularly when multiple length scales are employed^{22}, but it is not altogether eliminated. In fact, the adhesion of CB drops represents an almost ideal case of strong dilute defects for investigating the effects of contact line pinning^{23}. When a CB drop is moved across a surface, the advancing portion of the contact line simply lies down onto the next roughness features and contributes negligible resistance to drop motion. The deformations due to pinning are localized at the receding region, and as the contact line is displaced, it is hypothesized that microcapillary bridges are formed at each pinning site^{11,24,25}. For the contact line to move, the microcapillary bridges must somehow detach from the surface, either by depinning and receding from each roughness feature, or by necking and rupturing. Although the complete mechanism is not known, the global adhesion of the entire liquid drop is dependent on the detachment of these microcapillary bridges. After numerous studies^{24,26,27,28,29,30,31,32}, several details of the behaviour of these microcapillary bridges remain uncertain. Currently, models based on perpillar adhesion force rely on a correction factor^{23,33} and computational models rely on satisfying the Gibbs criterion to result in depinning of the capillary bridges^{34}. This latter assumption states that as a contact line recedes around a sharp corner, it will remain pinned until it reaches the intrinsic receding angle^{35}. This assumption remains to be validated experimentally, as the microscopic receding contact angle of a Cassie droplet on a superhydrophobic surface has not yet been measured. In a study by Chibbaro et al.,^{36} the authors investigated capillary filling using three computational methods: molecular dynamics, lattice Boltzmann equations and computational fluid dynamics. Surprisingly, they found that for a meniscus advancing over obstacles below a certain size, the Gibbs criterion breaks down due to coalescence of the meniscus with nearby condensed molecules. However, these violations of the Gibbs criterion disappear once the obstacles are made large enough. Therefore, it would be important to also experimentally establish the smallest length scale at which the Gibbs criterion is still satisfied.
Experimental investigations of wetting and contact angles at very small length scales are rare. Recently, Mirsaidov et al.^{37} used an electron beam to induce movement of drops of water as small as 10–80 nm in diameter and observed unusuallyshaped toroidal drops. Although they did not measure nanoscale contact angles directly, the drops nevertheless exhibited advancing and receding fronts as they moved along a surface. There have been only a handful of experimental investigations of microcapillary bridges, and all highresolution imaging has been restricted to static drops^{24,38,39,40,41,42,43}. Though some have examined the dynamic behaviour, the limited resolution of the threedimensional details leaves the deformation processes unclear^{23,33,44,45}. Furthermore, the effect of multiple length scales on both the behaviour of microcapillary bridges and macroscopic adhesion of drops remains unresolved.
Here we present a method that allows for direct observation of the dynamics of the microscopic contact lines of nonwetting drops to provide quantitative measurements of the deformations at micron length scales. This method allows us to relate the deformations of the contact line to the geometry of the pinning sites. We apply this approach to the specific situation of superhydrophobic surfaces and reveal a selfsimilar mechanism of contact line depinning. This understanding leads to the prediction of the adhesion force of a drop to a hierarchically textured surface based on the geometry of the roughness features.
Results
Dynamic imaging of microscale deformations
An environmental scanning electron microscope (ESEM) was used to observe the moving contact line of a water droplet at micron length scales. A 10 μl water drop was affixed to the end of a copper wire, which allowed the drop to be held against a vertically oriented surface and also provided a cooling flux to minimize evaporation (Fig. 1a). By rotating the motorized stage of the ESEM, the droplet was swept across the surface at a velocity of 2 μm s^{−1} while observing the depinning events of the contact line at micron length scales (Fig. 1b). The surfaces consisted of silicon micropillars with width w=10 μm, height h=10 μm, edgetoedge spacing s varying from 3.3 μm to 75 μm. The surfaces were coated with a hydrophobic modifier (tridecafluoro1,1,2,2, tetrahydrooctyltrichlorosilane). Advancing and receding contact angles of DI water on a smooth silicon surface treated with the hydrophobic modifier were 120°±2° and 90°±3°, respectively.
A single frame from an ESEM movie is shown in Fig. 1c depicting the formation of capillary bridges. Movies of the depinning events on various surfaces are provided in Supplementary Movies 1, 2, 3, 4. Some important observations can be immediately drawn from the highresolution images (Fig. 2). It is clear that the macroscopic contact line is not continuous, but is instead composed of a multitude of microscopic contact lines at the top of each pillar. The difference in behaviour between the advancing and receding contact line is apparent in Fig. 2a, in which the advancing contact line lays down onto the next roughness features with a contact angle of ~180° before advancing further. At the receding contact line, numerous microcontact lines sit at the bases of capillary bridges, which are stretched vertically until they detach from the pillars (see Supplementary Table S1 and Supplementary Note 1 for detailed discussion of bridge detachment). The deformations range from severely distorted capillary bridges sitting on top of micropillars at the periphery of the contact patch to smaller distortions at interior micropillars (Fig. 1c). Because the vapour–liquid interface at the centre of the contact patch sags between pillars^{46,47}, there should be a region over which the vapour–liquid interface is nearly flat, as it begins to deform vertically upwards near the periphery of the contact patch. The extent of the deformation depends on the surface tension of the liquid, and on the density and strength of the pinning features. Lower surface tensions should result in only partially formed peripheral capillary bridges and no interior bridges, as observed recently with cured epoxy drops^{41,42}. Nevertheless, we observe fully formed peripheral capillary bridges that can be approximated as catenoids atop a sharpedged disk^{48,49}. The details of the shape of the multiple catenoids at the base of a spherical drop would be difficult to describe analytically, so we make further simplifying assumptions. We approximate the capillary bridges in the vicinity of the microcontact lines to have two constant principal radii of curvature, as highlighted in Fig. 3: r_{1} in the plane of the surface, corresponding to the radius of the bridge, r_{2} corresponding to the arch between adjacent bridges. The first radius of curvature is constrained by the pinned microcontact line to be approximately equal to the halfwidth of a pillar: r_{1}~w/2. The second radius of curvature can be calculated by considering the mean curvature of the drop. Neglecting the effects of gravity, the mean curvature of the drop H must remain constant everywhere: H=2/R, where R is the radius of the drop. Locally to the capillary bridges, the mean curvature can be estimated by H=1/r_{1}+1/r_{2}. In the limit that the radius of the drop R >> r_{1}, the second radius of curvature between peripheral micropillars can attain a minimum value approximately equal to the halfwidth of the pillar: r_{2}~w/2. The radius of curvature between micropillars close to the centre of the contact patch can be much larger than w/2, and simply scales as the radius of the drop: r_{2}~R (ref. 46). Thus, the extent of the deformations around each peripheral capillary bridge scales with the dimensions of the roughness features. This is consistent with previous observations of contact line distortions at larger length scales^{14,43}. When the micropillars are sparsely spaced (s>2w), the deformations of a capillary bridge will not interact with those of an adjacent capillary bridge (Fig. 3a), corresponding to the condition of dilute defects^{11}. As the spacing between roughness features decreases, we see that adjacent bridges begin to interact (Fig. 3b). This leads to a shorter capillary bridge with a larger contact angle. A similar interaction of menisci has been shown in the case of liquid imbibition through square pillar arrays^{50}.
Most significantly, we are able to directly measure the microscopic contact angle θ_{μ} at the base of each microcapillary bridge as shown in Fig. 4. Our observations show that it can take any value ranging from the advancing contact angle to the intrinsic receding contact angle. The microscopic contact angle reaches a minimum receding value immediately before a capillary bridge detaches from a micropillar: . This microscopic receding contact angle is consistent across all micropillars and is approximately equal to the intrinsic receding angle on a smooth silanized substrate measured using a goniometer: θ^{r}=90°±3°. This observation indicates that the Gibbs criterion for depinning is indeed met at the top surface of the micropillars. In the current study, the microscopic contact angle at the outer edge of a peripheral micropillar is less than that at the interior edges by more than 5° as seen in Fig. 3a, indicating that a capillary bridge will depin from the outer edge of a micropillar as put forth in recent studies^{29,31}. As the receding angle condition for depinning is always met first on the outer portion of a flattopped micropillar, the depinning condition is never reached at the interior portion.
Depinning from hierarchical textures
We imparted a second roughness scale by etching silicon nanograss^{51} into the tops of the micropillars while leaving the dimensions of the first scale unchanged. The contact line of a water drop on these samples was observed with the ESEM in the same manner as before. Figure 4 shows a comparison of the microscale receding contact angle observed on these two types of surfaces measured immediately before detachment of the outermost capillary bridge. On nanograsscovered micropillars, the microscale receding contact angle increases to and is about equal to the macroscopic receding angle measured using a goniometer on a sample with only a nanograss texture (), indicating that the Gibbs criterion is met for each of the two classes of surfaces (smooth micropillars and nanograsscovered micropillars).
Discussion
We observe a higher microscale receding angle for the capillary bridges on the nanograsscovered micropillars as compared with the smooth micropillars. We propose that this is due to a selfsimilar depinning mechanism, for which the total pinned length of the contact lines at each level of the hierarchical roughness must be taken into account.
Considering a droplet sitting on a surface comprising multiple levels of roughness features (Fig. 5a), the apparent macroscopic contact line of the drop comprises the zeroth level of hierarchy and will actually be divided into many smaller contact lines, each sitting on top of a roughness feature at the first level (Fig. 5b). The receding angle exhibited by the capillary bridges local to the first level of hierarchy will be different from that exhibited by a drop observed at the zeroth level (the macroscopic contact angles measured by a goniometer). The microscale contact angle on smooth micropillars observed by the ESEM is synonymous with . If the contact lines of these firstlevel capillary bridges are observed at an even smaller length scale, we hypothesize that they will be divided into even smaller contact lines, each sitting on top of a roughness feature at the second level of hierarchy (Fig. 5c). The receding angle of these secondlevel capillary bridges local to the second level of hierarchy will in turn be different from that observed at the first length scale. This selfsimilar pattern of subdivided contact lines and differing local contact angles may be continued down successive levels until reaching a level n that exhibits a homogeneous wetting interface^{25}. At this cutoff level, the contact line on each roughness feature will be continuous. Thus, the actual pinned length of the apparent contact line at any level will be determined by the geometry of the roughness features at all smaller levels, if they exist. If the tops of the roughness features at the cutoff level are also flat, as is the case with the smooth micropillars, the local receding angle should approach the intrinsic receding angle, that is, .
The apparent contact line at any level can be projected onto the tops of the roughness features of the next smallerscale level. The projected contact line will traverse a number of individual roughness elements, as illustrated in Fig. 6a, in which a portion of a projected contact line traverses seven square micropillars. This hypothetical drop will be pinned to both the peripheral micropillars and the interior micropillars, but significant distortion occurs only at the micropillars that sit directly under the projected contact line. The total pinned length is simply the perimeter of each micropillar P multiplied by the number of peripheral micropillars N. The effective pinned fraction φ of a projected contact line of length l can then be found as φ=NP/l. As the number of micropillars per length N/l is equal to the inverse of the average micropillar pitch τ, the pinned fraction can be rewritten as φ=P/τ. Thus, if the roughness features are sparsely spaced, only a small fraction of the projected contact line will be pinned (Fig. 6b, row 1). However, if the pillars are packed densely, then the pinned fraction will increase. In some cases, φ may be greater than 1, indicating that the sum of the lengths of the contact lines of the peripheral capillary bridges is greater than the length of the projected contact line (Fig. 6b, row 2).
The pinned fraction concept can be further applied to structures with multiple hierarchies. Just as the apparent macroscopic contact line of a millimetric drop can be projected onto the tops of the micropillars to obtain the number of peripheral microcapillary bridges, the contact lines of the microcapillary bridges can be projected onto the tops of the nanoscale features to find the number of peripheral nanocapillary bridges. The total pinned fraction of a macroscopic contact line at the zeroth level Φ_{0} can be calculated for a surface with n hierarchical roughness levels by the product of the pinned fraction at each level:
where P_{i} and τ_{i} are the perimeter and average pitch, respectively, of the roughness features at the i^{th} level of the hierarchy. The quantity l_{0}Φ_{0} then gives the total pinned length of a projected contact line of length l_{0} sitting on a surface with n roughness levels. This total pinned length is equal to the sum of the lengths of contact lines of all peripheral capillary bridges at the n^{th} hierarchical level. Similarly, if we wish to find the total pinned length for a subset of levels starting at j<n, we calculate Φ_{j} by evaluating equation (1) from i=j+1 through n:
The total pinned length is then given by l_{j}Φ_{j}, where l_{j} is the perimeter of a roughness feature at the j^{th} level. This is useful, for example, in calculating the total pinned length of an individual microcapillary bridge sitting on a micropillar that itself has additional finer roughness levels. In this case, l_{j} is equal to the perimeter of the micropillar, and is equal to the product of the pinned fractions on the second level and all finer levels. Finally, as the contact line at the n^{th} level is continuous, it is not subdivided any further and the pinned fraction Φ_{n}=1.
Surprisingly, equation (1) indicates that adding multiple roughness levels does not necessarily decrease the total pinned fraction. As an example, consider a surface with one roughness scale consisting of sparse micropillars, such that Φ_{0}=φ_{1}<1. If we impart an additional level consisting of sparse nanograss such that φ_{2}<1, then the total pinned fraction becomes Φ_{0}=φ_{1}φ_{2}, which is less than the original pinned fraction. Indeed, for many familiar hierarchical superhydrophobic surfaces such as lotus leaves, there are two roughness scales, and the pinned fraction at both levels is less than one^{52}. However, if the nanograss features had been very densely packed such that φ_{2}>1, then the total pinned fraction of the duallevel surface would have been greater than that of the singlelevel micropillar surface: φ_{1}φ_{2}>φ_{1}. This is the case for some nanotube surfaces for which the pinned fraction can be greater than 3, leading to very high droplet adhesion^{53}.
The adhesion force of a drop to a hierarchical superhydrophobic surface with discrete roughness features can be determined by considering the force due to surface tension acting along the bases of the capillary bridges. By considering a vertical force balance on the drop (Supplementary Note 2 and Supplementary Fig. S1), the adhesion of the entire drop is predominantly dictated by the vertical component of surface tension acting at the peripheral capillary bridges. The force pinning a single capillary bridge at the j^{th} level can be written as , where P_{j} is the perimeter of an individual roughness feature onto which the bridge is pinned, σ is the liquid–vapour surface tension, θ_{j} is the contact angle local to j^{th} level, and ds is a differential length along the perimeter. In the present case, to estimate the maximum adhesion force before detachment, we approximate the contact angle as being uniform around the entire perimeter of the micropillar and equal to the receding angle local to the j^{th} level , so the previous expression simplifies to (see Supplementary Note 3 for discussion of error analysis). If there exist additional roughness levels, the adhesion of the j^{th}level capillary bridges will be determined by depinning of capillary bridges at the smaller levels. This will in turn affect the value of .
Because of the mechanism of selfsimilar depinning, the adhesion of the entire j^{th}level bridge will be governed by the detachment of the capillary bridges atop features at the n^{th} level. As the local receding contact angle at this final level, will be approximately equal to the intrinsic receding angle θ^{r}, the vertical force exerted by a single n^{th}level peripheral capillary bridge due to surface tension will be , where P_{n} is the perimeter of a roughness feature at the n^{th} level, and θ^{r} is the intrinsic receding contact angle. Finally, the vertical adhesion force of the entire drop can be found by summing the forces due to all of the peripheral n^{th}level capillary bridges:
where l_{0} is the length of the projected macroscopic contact line. By normalizing the vertical adhesion force predicted by equation (3) to the adhesion force of a drop with an equivalent base radius on a smooth surface, given by (F/l)_{s}=σsin(θ^{r}), the resulting ratio suggests that Φ_{0} can be considered as a multiplier that reflects the strength of the pinning on the textured surface as compared with that on a smooth surface. Therefore, when Φ_{0}>1, the adhesion force per unit length of a contact line on a textured surface should be greater than that on a smooth surface, and vice versa. Because of selfsimilarity, the adhesion force per unit length of a single capillary bridge atop a feature at the j^{th} level is the same as that of a macroscopic drop sitting on a surface consisting of a texture with levels j+1 through n:
In other words, the adhesion force per unit length of the microscopic contact line of a microcapillary bridge on a single nanograssed micropillar is the same as that of a macroscopic drop on a surface with just a nanograss texture.
To validate our hypothesis of selfsimilar depinning, we compared the adhesion force predicted by equation (3) with experimental observations. Using a tensiometer, we measured the force required to pluck a millimetric drop vertically off of two types of surfaces: smooth micropillars and nanograsscovered micropillars (Fig. 7a). There is a significant decrease in adhesion to the nanograsscovered micropillars as compared with the smooth micropillars. Additionally, as the spacing ratio s/w increases, the density of micropillars and the adhesion force both decrease. For both the smooth and nanograsscovered micropillars, the pinned line fraction at the first level is given by φ_{1}=4w/(w+s). In the case of the nanograsscovered micropillars, there is a second roughness level (n=2) at a nanometre scale with a pinned fraction φ_{2}=0.18±0.05 measured from SEM images (Supplementary Fig. S3).
Figure 7b shows (F/l)_{0}/(F/l)_{s}— the measured adhesion force per unit projected length of the contact line of a macroscopic droplet normalized to that on a smooth surface—versus the total pinned fraction Φ_{0}. For both single and dualhierarchy surfaces, and even the lotus leaf, the data collapse onto the line predicted by equation (3). There is a deviation at denser pillar spacings because the roughness features are no longer in the regime of sparse defects, and the peripheral capillary bridges begin to interact with one another. This leads to a larger local receding angle between adjacent pillars as shown in Fig. 3b, thus we would expect the vertical component of surface tension to decrease. Indeed, we find that the normalized adhesion at larger pinned fractions (Φ_{0}≥1.5), which corresponds to the regime of dense spacings, is lower than that predicted by equation (3).
The effect of the second level of hierarchy can be factored out by normalizing the measured vertical adhesion force per unit projected length of the contact line of a macroscopic drop from equation (3) with the force per unit length of a capillary bridge on top of the micropillars from equation (4) evaluated at j=1 to obtain the ratio (F/l)_{0}/(F/l)_{1}. Hence, plotting (F/l)_{0}/(F/l)_{1} against φ_{1} should yield similar results for both smooth micropillars and nanograssed micropillars, as the effect of the texture on top of the micropillars is cancelled. Indeed, Fig. 7c shows that the normalized adhesion forces measured on nanograssed micropillars match well with those measured on smooth micropillars, and as predicted, both lie along a line with a slope of 1. Furthermore, the normalized adhesion forces on the nanograssed micropillars display a similar plateau due to capillary bridges interacting at the microscale level, as seen with the smooth micropillars. However, as the receding angle local to the micropillars is greater for the nanograssed micropillars, they will begin interact at wider spacings than for smooth micropillars and exhibit normalized adhesion forces that are lower than predicted. One might expect that adding any additional level of microtexture to the nanograss would have decreased the adhesion force per unit length. Interestingly, we find that the normalized adhesion of nanograssed micropillars with small s is greater than that of a surface with just a nanograss texture. This can be explained by realizing that the total pinned fraction involves the product of the pinned fractions at both levels, and since φ_{1}>1 for s<30 μm, we see how dense nanograssed micropillars (φ_{1}≥1.5) can exhibit greater normalized adhesion per unit length than a surface with just a nanograss texture. This result is counterintuitive, and shows how additional roughness levels will decrease the adhesion force per length only if the pinned fraction at that level is less than one. As the pinned fraction of a particular level is increased beyond one, that level will act to increase the adhesion force per unit length. However, the adhesion force will saturate when the pinned fraction at that level reaches a critical value (φ_{i}≥1.5 in the current case) above which the capillary bridges at that level begin to interact.
Using a novel technique for observing the dynamic behaviour of a threephase contact line and quantitatively measuring contact angles at micron length scales, we show direct evidence that the Gibbs criterion is satisfied at these length scales. We introduce a model that describes a selfsimilar depinning mechanism and accounts for the effects of the hierarchical roughness features. The model described in equation (4) shows that the adhesion force per unit length of the projected contact line may be either increased or decreased by adding multiple length scales of roughness depending on the pinned fraction of each level of hierarchy. This finding is important for designing surfaces with minimal adhesion, as it quantifies the effect of multiple length scales on the adhesion of a liquid drop on a textured surface: to reduce adhesion, the product of the pinned fractions at all length scales must be less than one. Furthermore, two micropillar geometries that have identical area fractions may have different pinned fractions depending on their perimeter and spacing, whereas any attempt to calculate pinning or hysteresis based on area fraction would yield identical results for the two surfaces. In agreement with our mechanism, experiments have shown that the hysteresis differs depending on the micropillar perimeter and tip geometry^{24,40,53}. Our technique could also enable the detailed imaging of contact line behaviour on complex pillar geometries and on intricate biological surfaces, such as water strider legs^{54} and fibre arrays^{55}.
Methods
Fabrication of superhydrophobic substrates.
Silicon substrates (ntype ‹100›) were patterned with arrays of square micropillars 10 μm high and 10 μm wide, with spacings ranging from 3.3–75 μm, using standard positive photolithography techniques and deep reactiveion etching. By performing a plasma etch with O_{2} and SF_{6}, a silicon nanograss texture was etched into the top surfaces of the micropillar structures. All surfaces were coated with a hydrophobic modifier (tridecafluoro1,1,2,2, tetrahydrooctyltrichlorosilane). Advancing and receding contact angles of DI water on a smooth silicon surface treated with the hydrophobic modifier were measured with a goniometer (Model 500, raméhart) at 25 °C to be 120°±2° and 90°±3°, respectively. Lotus leaves were generously provided by Marilyn Eigsti of Wonderful Water Lilies, Sarasota, FL.
Insitu imaging using ESEM apparatus
A Zeiss EVO55 ESEM was used for imaging. A custom fixture was fabricated to mount the samples vertically in the ESEM and provide cooling with a Deben Coolstage Mk II Peltier cooling stage. A 10 μl water drop was affixed to the end of a copper wire that allowed the drop to be held against a vertically oriented surface, and also provided a cooling flux to minimize evaporation. By rotating the motorized stage of the ESEM, the droplet was swept across the surface at a velocity of 2 μm s^{−1} while observing the depinning events of the contact line at micron length scales. The chamber of the ESEM was maintained at a pressure of 1,000 Pa.
Nanograss pinned fraction
Highresolution SEMs were used to estimate the pinned fraction of the silicon nanograss. The perimeters of the tops of the roughness features were identified and measured manually, as well as the distances between adjacent roughness features. A representative frame is shown in Supplementary Fig. S2. The pinned fraction was taken as the average of the perimeters of the roughness features divided by the average distance between the centroid of each feature. A pinned fraction of 0.18±0.05 was determined as the average value from five SEM images taken at different locations.
Macroscale tensiometer adhesion measurements
A Sigma KSV 700 tensiometer was used to measure the adhesion force of water drops on superhydrophobic surfaces (Supplementary Fig. S3). A 3 μl drop was held at the end of the force balance and lowered onto a test surface at 0.5 mm min^{−1} until a compressive force of 1 nN was measured, indicating contact with the surface. The drop was then lifted at 0.5 mm min^{−1} until detachment, at which point the tensile force and contact patch radius were measured. Measurements were repeated at five locations on each sample.
Additional information
How to cite this article: Paxson, A.T. and Varanasi, K.K. SelfSimilarity of contact line depinning from textured surfaces. Nat. Commun. 4:1492 doi: 10.1038/ncomms2482 (2013).
References
Prakash M., Quéré D. & Bush J. W. M. . Surface tension transport of prey by feeding shorebirds: the capillary ratchet. Science 320, 931–934 (2008) .
Zheng Y., Gao X. & Jiang L. . Directional adhesion of superhydrophobic butterfly wings. Soft Matter 3, 178–182 (2007) .
Zheng Y. et al. Directional water collection on wetted spider silk. Nature 463, 640–643 (2010) .
Dussan V. E. B. & Davis S. H. . On the motion of a fluidfluid interface along a solid surface. J. Fluid Mech. 65, 71–95 (1974) .
Carey V. P. . Liquid Vapor Phase Change Phenomena: An Introduction to the Thermophysics of Vaporization and Condensation Processes in Heat Transfer Equipment 2nd edn Taylor & Francis (2007) .
Chen et al. Nanowires for enhanced boiling heat transfer. Nano Lett. 9, 548–553 (2009) .
Boreyko J. & Chen C. . Selfpropelled dropwise condensate on superhydrophobic surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 184501 (2009) .
Patankar N. A. . Supernucleating surfaces for nucleate boiling and dropwise condensation heat transfer. Soft Matter 6, 1613 (2010) .
Koc Y. et al. Nanoscale superhydrophobicity: suppression of protein adsorption and promotion of flowinduced detachment. Lab Chip 8, 582–586 (2008) .
Choi W. et al. Bubbles navigating through networks of microchannels. Lab Chip 11, 3970–3978 (2011) .
Joanny J. F. & De Gennes P. G. . A model for contact angle hysteresis. J. Chem. Phys. 81, 552–562 (1984) .
Pompe T. & Herminghaus S. . Threephase contact line energetics from nanoscale liquid surface topographies. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1930 (2000) .
Vedantam S. & Panchagnula M. V. . Phase field modeling of hysteresis in sessile drops. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 176102 (2007) .
Decker E. L., Frank B., Suo Y. & Garoff S. . Physics of contact angle measurement. Colloids Surf. A 156, 177–189 (1999) .
Pagonabarraga I. . Wetting dynamics: adsorbed colloids relax slowly. Nat. Mater. 11, 99–100 (2012) .
Kaz D. M., McGorty R., Mani M., Brenner M. P. & Manoharan V. N. . Physical ageing of the contact line on colloidal particles at liquid interfaces. Nat. Mater. 11, 138–142 (2011) .
Giovambattista N., Debenedetti P. G. & Rossky P. J. . Enhanced surface hydrophobicity by coupling of surface polarity and topography. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 15181–15185 (2009) .
Lafuma A. & Quéré D. . Superhydrophobic states. Nat. Mater. 2, 457–460 (2003) .
Tuteja A., Choi W., Mabry J. M., McKinley G. H. & Cohen R. E. . Robust omniphobic surfaces. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 18200–18205 (2008) .
Koishi T., Yasuoka K., Fujikawa S., Ebisuzaki T. & Zeng X. C. . Coexistence and transition between Cassie and Wenzel state on pillared hydrophobic surface. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 8435–8440 (2009) .
Bocquet L. & Lauga E. . A smooth future? Nat. Mater. 10, 334–337 (2011) .
Shirtcliffe N. J., McHale G., Newton M. I., Chabrol G. & Perry C. C. . Dualscale roughness produces unusually waterrepellent surfaces. Adv. Mater. 16, 1929–1932 (2004) .
Reyssat M. & Queéreé D. . Contact angle hysteresis generated by strong dilute defects. J. Phys. Chem. B 113, 3906–3909 (2009) .
Oner D. & McCarthy T. . Ultrahydrophobic surfaces. Effects of topography length scales on wettability. Langmuir 16, 7777–7782 (2000) .
Herminghaus S. . Roughnessinduced nonwetting. Europhys. Lett. 52, 165–170 (2000) .
Bico J., Marzolin C. & Quéré D. . Pearl drops. Europhys. Lett. 47, 220–226 (1999) .
Extrand C. W. . Model for contact angles and hysteresis on rough and ultraphobic surfaces. Langmuir 18, 7991–7999 (2002) .
Gao L. & McCarthy T. J. . Contact angle hysteresis explained. Langmuir 22, 6234–6237 (2006) .
Dorrer C. & Rühe J. . Advancing and receding motion of droplets on ultrahydrophobic post surfaces. Langmuir 22, 7652–7657 (2006) .
Kusumaatmaja H. & Yeomans J. M. . Modeling contact angle hysteresis on chemically patterned and superhydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir 23, 6019–6032 (2007) .
Patankar N. A. . Hysteresis with regard to cassie and wenzel states on superhydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir 26, 7498–7503 (2010) .
Krumpfer J. W. & McCarthy T. J. . Contact angle hysteresis: a different view and a trivial recipe for low hysteresis hydrophobic surfaces. Faraday Discuss. 146, 103 (2010) .
Lv C., Yang C., Hao P., He F. & Zheng Q. . Sliding of water droplets on microstructured hydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir 26, 8704–8708 (2010) .
Mognetti B. M. & Yeomans J. M. . Modeling receding contact lines on superhydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir 26, 18162–18168 (2010) .
Gibbs J. W. . The Scientific Papers, Vol I: Thermodynamics Dover Publications (1961) .
Chibbaro S. et al. Capillary filling in microchannels with wall corrugations: a comparative study of the concus−finn criterion by continuum, kinetic, and atomistic approaches. Langmuir 25, 12653–12660 (2009) .
Mirsaidov U. M., Zheng H., Bhattacharya D., Casana Y. & Matsudaira P. . Direct observation of stickslip movements of water nanodroplets induced by an electron beam. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 7187–7190 (2012) .
Choi W., Tuteja A., Mabry J. M., Cohen R. E. & McKinley G. H. . A modified CassieBaxter relationship to explain contact angle hysteresis and anisotropy on nonwetting textured surfaces. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 339, 208–216 (2009) .
Luo C. et al. Direct threedimensional imaging of the buried interfaces between water and superhydrophobic surfaces. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49, 9145–9148 (2010) .
Krumpfer J. W., Bian P., Zheng P., Gao L. & McCarthy T. J. . Contact angle hysteresis on superhydrophobic surfaces: an ionic liquid probe fluid offers mechanistic insight. Langmuir 27, 2166–2169 (2011) .
Dufour R. et al. Zipping effect on omniphobic surfaces for controlled deposition of minute amounts of fluid or colloids. Small 8, 1229–1236 (2012) .
Dufour R., Harnois M., Thomy V., Boukherroub R. & Senez V. . Contact angle hysteresis origins: investigation on superomniphobic surfaces. Soft Matter 7, 9380–9387 (2011) .
Papadopoulos P. et al. Wetting on the microscale: shape of a liquid drop on a microstructured surface at different length scales. Langmuir 28, 8392–8398 (2012) .
Chatain D., Lesueur C. & Baland J.P. . Wetting of Pb on oxidized micropatterned Si wafers. Langmuir 22, 4230–4236 (2006) .
Priest C., Albrecht T. W. J., Sedev R. & Ralston J. . Asymmetric wetting hysteresis on hydrophobic microstructured surfaces. Langmuir 25, 5655–5660 (2009) .
Reyssat M., Yeomans J. M. & Quéré D. . Impalement of fakir drops. Europhys. Lett. 81, 26006 (2008) .
Rathgen H. & Mugele F. . Microscopic shape and contact angle measurement at a superhydrophobic surface. Faraday Discuss. 146, 49 (2010) .
Huh C. & Scriven L. E. . Shapes of axisymmetric fluid interfaces of unbounded extent. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 30, 323–337 (1969) .
Padday J. F., Pitt A. R. & Pashley R. M. . Menisci at a free liquid surface: surface tension from the maximum pull on a rod. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1 71, 1919 (1975) .
Mognetti B. M. & Yeomans J. M. . Capillary filling in microchannels patterned by posts. Phys. Rev. E 80, 056309 (2009) .
Dorrer C. & Rühe J. . Wetting of silicon nanograss: from superhydrophilic to superhydrophobic surfaces. Adv. Mater. 20, 159–163 (2008) .
Neinhuis C. & Barthlott W. . Characterization and distribution of waterrepellent, selfcleaning plant surfaces. Ann. Bot. 79, 667 (1997) .
Cheng Z., Gao J. & Jiang L. . Tip geometry controls adhesive states of superhydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir 26, 8233–8238 (2010) .
Prakash M. & Bush J. W. M. . Interfacial propulsion by directional adhesion. Int. J. Non Linear Mech. 46, 607–615 (2011) .
Duprat C., Protière S., Beebe A. Y. & Stone H. A. . Wetting of flexible fibre arrays. Nature 482, 510–513 (2012) .
Acknowledgements
We thank A. Graham at Harvard CNS for his invaluable assistance with the ESEM, A. Rotem and Professor D.A. Weitz for the use of their tensiometer, and Professor G.H. McKinley and Professor J.W.M. Bush for their valuable input to the manuscript. We are grateful for support from NSF Career Award no. 0952564 and the DuPontMIT Alliance. A.T.P. acknowledges support from NSF GRFP. This work was performed in part at the Center for Nanoscale Systems (CNS), a member of the National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network (NNIN), which is supported by the National Science Foundation under NSF award no. ECS0335765. CNS is part of Harvard University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A.T.P. and K.K.V. conceived the project, analysed the data, and wrote the paper. A.T.P. carried out the experiments.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Figures S1S3, Supplementary Table S1, Supplementary Notes 13 and Supplementary References (PDF 595 kb)
Supplementary Movie 1
A 10 μL water droplet receding to the left atop smooth silicon micropillars with 40 μm edgetoedge spacing. Playback speed is 2x realtime. (MOV 1514 kb)
Supplementary Movie 2
A 10 μL water droplet being swept back and forth across smooth silicon micropillars with 3.3 μm edgetoedge spacing. Playback speed is 2x realtime. (MOV 3693 kb)
Supplementary Movie 3
Comparison of capillary bridge formation on dense and sparse micropillar structures. Both Movies depict a 10 μL drop receding to the left atop smooth micropillars. Upper Movie depicts micropillars with 15 μm edgetoedge spacing; lower Movie depicts micropillars with 75 μm edgetoedge spacing. (MOV 228 kb)
Supplementary Movie 4
Comparison of receding events on single and duallevel hierarchical surfaces. Both Movies depict a 10 μL drop receding to the left. Upper Movie depicts smooth micropillars with 15 μm edgetoedge spacing. Bottom Movie depicts nanograsscovered micropillars with 25 μm edgetoedge spacing. (MOV 268 kb)
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons AttributionNonCommercialShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/byncsa/3.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Paxson, A., Varanasi, K. Selfsimilarity of contact line depinning from textured surfaces. Nat Commun 4, 1492 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2482
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2482
This article is cited by

Live imaging of micro and macro wettability variations of carbonate oil reservoirs for enhanced oil recovery and CO2 trapping/storage
Scientific Reports (2022)

A droplet reactor on a superhydrophobic surface allows control and characterization of amyloid fibril growth
Communications Biology (2020)

Explaining EvaporationTriggered Wetting Transition Using Local Force Balance Model and Contact LineFraction
Scientific Reports (2019)

Adhesion energy per unit area various liquid droplets on PMMA, Parylene C and PPFC coated flat solid surfaces
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology (2019)

Insitu ATRFTIR for dynamic analysis of superhydrophobic breakdown on nanostructured silicon surfaces
Scientific Reports (2018)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.