Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Towards colloidal spintronics through Rashba spin-orbit interaction in lead sulphide nanosheets


Employing the spin degree of freedom of charge carriers offers the possibility to extend the functionality of conventional electronic devices, while colloidal chemistry can be used to synthesize inexpensive and tunable nanomaterials. Here, in order to benefit from both concepts, we investigate Rashba spin–orbit interaction in colloidal lead sulphide nanosheets by electrical measurements on the circular photo-galvanic effect. Lead sulphide nanosheets possess rock salt crystal structure, which is centrosymmetric. The symmetry can be broken by quantum confinement, asymmetric vertical interfaces and a gate electric field leading to Rashba-type band splitting in momentum space at the M points, which results in an unconventional selection mechanism for the excitation of the carriers. The effect, which is supported by simulations of the band structure using density functional theory, can be tuned by the gate electric field and by the thickness of the sheets. Spin-related electrical transport phenomena in colloidal materials open a promising pathway towards future inexpensive spintronic devices.


Though in the last decades developments in semiconductor device engineering led to constantly improved performances, nowadays it is very difficult to keep this pace1,2. Further challenges in terms of manufacturing cost, flexibility, power consumption and device functionality are ahead, for example, for the internet of things2,3. Recent ideas try to address these issues by the introduction of new materials as the active semiconductor channel or new mechanisms of information processing2,4. One solution is replacing the electron charge by its spin as an information carrier4,5. For this purpose, materials with strong spin–orbit coupling (SOC) are particularly interesting since in these materials spin orientation can be manipulated by an external electrical field5,6,7,8. In semiconductors, SOC can originate from bulk inversion asymmetry (Dresselhaus SOC) or from structural inversion asymmetry (Rashba SOC)5,6,7,9,10. Since Rashba SOC can be influenced by customizing the structure (for example, by confining the material) or by a gate voltage, it is being studied comprehensively5,6,7,10. As a further development in data processing, the concept of valleytronics has been introduced for materials with multiple valleys (multiple extrema with equal energies) in the band structure11,12,13,14. By controlling the number of carriers in each valley, a so-called valley-polarized current can be produced, which leads to an additional degree of freedom4,12,13,14. As a consequence of spin–valley coupling in these materials, it has been shown that the valleys can be also populated selectively based on the spin of the carriers11,12,13,15.

Up to now, spin/valley-dependent transport phenomena have been investigated mostly in two-dimensional nanostructures prepared by industry-incompatible methods (for example, mechanical exfoliation) or by cost-intensive instruments such as molecular-beam epitaxy6,9,16. In this work, we demonstrate the presence of easily accessible SOC in nanomaterials synthesized by colloidal chemistry. The solution-based synthesis of colloidal nanomaterials offers enormous opportunities in the production of inexpensive and high-quality crystals for electronic and, as we will show, spintronic devices17,18,19. Colloidal lead sulphide (PbS) nanosheets as continuous 2D crystals with promising properties do not suffer from tunnel barriers like other colloidal systems, such as thin films of nanoparticles17,18,20. However, their rock salt crystal structure is centrosymmetric. In order to break the inversion symmetry, we apply an electric field (gate) to the crystal as well as different boundaries underneath and above the PbS nanosheet (SiO2 and vacuum)6,21. In combination with strong SOC, this suggests Rashba-type band splitting, which is confirmed by Kohn-Sham density functional theory (KS-DFT). In PbS nanosheets, the band splitting occurs in momentum space at the four M points. Upon illumination with circularly polarized light, the circular photo-galvanic effect (CPGE) leads to a net current that can be explained by an unconventional selection mechanism, depending on the spin orientation of the carriers. The observed effect is precisely tunable by changing the gate voltage or by changing the confinement (thickness of the sheets).


Circular photo-galvanic measurements on the nanosheets

We synthesized PbS nanosheets with lateral dimensions of up to 5 μm and tunable thickness of 2–20 nm by introducing different amounts of oleic acid to the synthesis19,20,22 (for crystallographic characterization see Supplementary Fig. 1). The height of the nanosheets directly determines the band gap of the material by confinement23. This tunability is of advantage for the performance of applications such as transistors, photodetectors and solar cells17,18,20,23. The synthesis of the nanosheets is independent of the fabrication of the devices, which makes it practical for industrial applications. The nanosheets were spin-coated on Si/SiO2 substrates and contacted individually with Au electrodes by electron-beam lithography (see Supplementary Fig. 2). The contacts were placed in <110> direction of the crystal (corresponding to the M point direction in k-space) which is also the lateral growth direction of the nanosheets.

In order to evidence the possibility of spin manipulation in PbS nanosheets, we performed measurements on the CPGE as a function of light polarization6,7,9,10,11,12. For this purpose, photo-excited charge carriers with preferred spin orientation were prepared by illumination with circularly polarized light produced by a linearly polarized laser beam (λ=627 nm) through a quarter-wave plate. The helicity of the exciting light was determined by the angle of the quarter-wave plate, which controls the spin orientation of the carriers. The beam was pointed to the sample obliquely in the yz plane (x is the direction of the current flow, z is normal to the nanosheet and y is perpendicular to these two).

Figure 1a schematically illustrates the experimental setup. This configuration provides the required inversion asymmetry (including the gate electric field and asymmetric vertical boundaries) in order to detect the CPGE. Bulk PbS with a rock salt crystal structure obeys the Oh point group symmetry which is inversion symmetric. By confining the material in z direction (height of the nanosheets), the symmetry is reduced first to the D4h point group and then, by application of asymmetric vertical interfaces on top and underneath (SiO2 and vacuum) as well as by the gate electric field, to C4v. For this symmetry group, the inversion centre is absent, which supports the band splitting by SOC (Fig. 1b). Figure 1c depicts the variation of the photocurrent with changing the angle of the quarter-wave plate. It shows that illumination of the unbiased devices can yield a non-zero helicity-dependent photocurrent whose direction can be reversed by changing the light polarization from right-handed to left-handed, which is a sign for a spin-polarized current, generated as a consequence of spin injection into a spin–orbit coupled system5,6,12. In addition to that, other polarization-independent currents are detected which should be distinguished from the spin-related current.

Figure 1: Circular photo-galvanic effect in lead sulfide nanosheet devices.

(a) Schematic image of the experimental setup. The semiconductor channel (PbS nanosheet, shown in grey) experiences an electric field and asymmetric interfaces (vacuum and SiO2, shown in blue) and is illuminated with circularly polarized light. (b) Breaking the inversion symmetry in a PbS crystal. The symmetry is reduced from Oh point group (for the bulk crystal) to C4v (2D crystal with external asymmetries). The blue and violet spheres represent lead and sulfur atoms respectively. The arrow shows the asymmetry in the crystal, including the gate electric field and the asymmetric interfaces. (c) Photocurrent at zero bias as a function of the quarter-wave plate angle (with a small non-zero incidence illumination angle). Fitting the results shows the existence of a non-zero CPGE current, suggested to originate from Rashba SOC in PbS nanosheets (LPGE: linear photo-galvanic effect). The arrows show the quarter-wave plate angles, in which the light is circularly or linearly polarized.

The generated photocurrent is described by the expression

which can be employed for fitting the measurement results to determine the contribution of each effect5,9,10,11,12,16. In the equation, J0 is the background current, resulting from, for example, photovoltaic effects, the Damber effect or hot electron injection. This component is independent of the helicity of the light. JLPGE is the amplitude of the linear photo-galvanic effect which is due to asymmetric scattering of electrons along the conduction path. Although the LPGE is a function of the quarter-wave plate angle, it is equal for the right-handed and left-handed polarized light, which implies its independency from the helicity or respectively the spin orientation of the carriers. The oscillation period of the LPGE is equal to 90°. Eventually, JCPGE is the amplitude of the CPGE, the current which is attributed to the population of the conduction band with spin-polarized charge carriers. In contrast to the LPGE, the CPGE oscillates with a period of 180°. It is maximum at a helicity of +1 (45° and 225°), minimum when the helicity is −1 (135° and 315°) and zero when the light is linearly polarized (0°, 90°, 180° and 270°) (refs 11, 16).

Origin of the effect

Generally, different phenomena can lead to the existence of a CPGE in a 2D material, including Rashba/Dresselhaus SOC5,6,9, orbital interactions16, spin–valley coupling11,12 or topological surface states24. Even in centrosymmetric materials with negligible SOC, in silicon or graphene for instance, this effect has been detected due to the asymmetry at the edges or contacts16,25 (in-plane asymmetries). Lead sulphide as a crystal including high atomic-number Pb atoms (Z(Pb)=82) can be considered as having strong SOC15,26. Further, the band structure of 2D PbS consists of a rectangular Brillouin zone with four equal valleys at the corners, the M points. By selectively exciting the carriers in each valley, a valley-polarized current might occur11,12,13,15,27. Such effects can be detected by the CPGE current since the angular momentum of circularly polarized photons couples to the spin or valley index of the carriers, or leads to asymmetric scattering of the carriers. In any case, an inversion asymmetry must be present in the structure, which results in an asymmetric distribution of carriers in momentum space or asymmetric movement of the carriers in a certain direction. Therefore, a net CPGE current can be observed5,6,9,10,11,12,16,25.

As the first step to explain the effect, we show that it mainly originates from the imposed vertical asymmetry to the crystal and not from the contacts/edges. For this purpose, we measured the CPGE current while we shadowed different parts of the device, to control the position of the beam and to intentionally enhance the asymmetry between the contacts/edges. Figure 2a shows the measured CPGE according to the position of the shadow. The measurements were done with a high incidence angle (about 15 degrees, the max. incidence angle due to the size of the view port of the vacuum chamber) and a lower one (around 6 degrees). By moving the shadow from one side of the device to the other one under the low incident angle, it is possible to reverse the direction of the in-plane asymmetry12,16,24,25, expressed by a sign change of the shadowed CPGE current Ishadow (Fig. 2a, positions C and E). On the other hand, the function shows an offset which implies that a part of the current is independent of the in-plane asymmetry. In the following, this part will be shown to be the current originating from the vertical asymmetry (Ivertical), caused by the two interfaces and the gate. By increasing the incidence angle, firstly it can be observed that the unshadowed current (Ifull) increases, which shows that the vertical asymmetry is an effective factor for generating Ifull. In fact, to observe the CPGE based on in-plane asymmetry (Iin-plane), illumination should be perpendicular to the surface of the nanosheets. For a vertical asymmetry, such illumination leads to a zero CPGE current, and Ivertical increases with increasing the incidence angle6,12,16,24,25,26, which explains the increase of the measured Ifull with the larger angle. When the shadow is applied, the imbalance of Ishadow (difference between the currents in positions C and E) becomes more pronounced with the higher illumination angle. It shows that Ivertical has a larger part in Ishadow, while Iin-plane is almost constant. By shadowing, we cover half of the device, which decreases the effective part of the crystal to generate Ivertical. In contrast, it leads to a higher Iin-plane, as we magnify the asymmetry. Since the share of Ivertical is larger now, Ishadow becomes less than Ifull (for the ideal contribution of Ivertical and Iin-plane see Supplementary Fig. 3). All of these observations prove that the vertical asymmetry is indeed able to generate a net CPGE current by changing the distribution of the carriers in the band structure, although they do not exclude the possibility of local in-plane asymmetries, such as contacts or edges.

Figure 2: Origin of the circular photo-galvanic effect in lead sulfide nanosheets.

(a) The generated CPGE by shadowing different positions of the device, and with different illumination angles. The blue and the red lines represent the high and the low illumination angles respectively. The letters indicate the position of the centre of the shadow. The contribution of the vertical asymmetry and the enhanced in-plane asymmetry can be observed (Ivertical and Iin-plane). The inset is a schematic top view of the device to illustrate the position of the shadow during the experiment. In position D the whole device is covered, in C and E half of the device (Ishadow), and A, B, F, and G represent the full illumination of the device (Ifull). (b) Illustration of the possible selection mechanism for exciting the carriers over the band gap. Illumination of the PbS crystal with circularly polarized light leads to transitions in both valleys but excitation of only one spin orientation. (kM,M’: momentum of the excited carriers in a valley). Here, the angular momentum of exciting photons is −1, which is added to the spin-angular momentum of electrons. The states are labeled as |J,M_J>.

Simulation of the band structure and the selection mechanism

In order to further investigate the origin of CPGE in PbS nanosheets, we calculated the band structure of clean PbS (001) slabs (with 15 atomic layers) including an external electric field using DFT based on the general-gradient approximation, employing the Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBE) exchange-correlation functional28 (see Supplementary Fig. 4). SOC was taken into account by using fully relativistic projector-augmented-wave (PAW) potentials. It should be pointed out that when SOC is considered, general-gradient approximation functionals are known to underestimate the band gap in bulk PbS and even predict a band inversion29,30. The usage of hybrid functionals (for example, Heyd–Scuseria–Ernzerhof) or many-body corrections like the GW approximation were shown to improve the agreement with experimental band gaps, but they are much more computationally demanding than pure DFT29,30. The qualitative trend of the influence of an external electric field on the band structure is expected to be described well enough by PBE to get reliable results, as this functional was already used to describe Rashba systems31,32,33.

Without an external electric field, inversion symmetry is maintained, and no Rashba spin splitting can be observed along the Γ–M–X path (see Supplementary Fig. 5a). At the band gap (M point), the two highest filled bands split in direction of the Γ point. Adding an external electric field along the surface normal breaks the inversion symmetry, and Rashba spin splitting occurs at the M point (see Supplementary Fig. 5b), which is confirmed by a spin texture typical for the Rashba effect (see Supplementary Fig. 5c). The Rashba spin splitting of the highest filled band differs from the splitting of the second highest filled band. Rashba spin splitting can be also observed for the conduction band.

The calculated band structure implies that by exciting the material with right-handed (left-handed) polarized light, that is photons with angular momentum of +1 (−1), some of the possible transitions between the valence and conduction bands are forbidden since energy and angular momentum must be conserved during the transition. The possible excitation mechanism of the carriers over the band gap is illustrated schematically in Fig. 2b. The bands are split around the M point. However, in contrast to other multi-valley materials, the splitting occurs in momentum space and the split bands, corresponding to the two opposite spin orientations, have equal energies. For materials with rectangular Brillouin zone, both valleys (M and M′) represent similar orbital characters. Therefore, they are not selectively populated by adjusting the angular momentum of the exciting photons (which is done by selecting the handedness of the circular polarization)27. On the other hand, by splitting the bands in momentum space, the angular momentum of the split bands becomes different for each spin. As it can be observed in Supplementary Fig. 6, total angular momentum of the valence band and the conduction band are respectively 3/2 and 1/2 with spin-angular momentum of 1/2 (ref. 34). By controlling the helicity of the exciting light, carriers can be selectively excited based on their spin orientation12,14,26. Upon illumination with circularly polarized light and population of the conduction band with spin-polarized electrons, the number of excited carriers is equal in the M valley and in the M′ valley, but the linear momentum differs, since splitting is asymmetric at these two points. For instance, the spin-up band is shifted away from the Gamma point (to higher momentum) at the M point, but towards the Gamma point (to lower momentum) at M′. Therefore, spin-up electrons at the M point have higher momentum compared to those at the M′ point. This results in the generation of the spin-polarized CPGE current based on Rashba SOC which splits the valleys of the band structure.

The current generated by the CPGE in the direction of a specific crystal orientation (λ) can be expressed by

where μ is one of the different crystal orientations (x, y, z), χ is the CPGE second-rank pseudo tensor which is directly affected by the crystal asymmetry, E0 is the electric field (complex amplitude) of the light wave, Pcirc is the helicity of the circularly polarized light (degree of polarization), e=q /q is the unit vector for the light propagation, and q is the wave vector of the light in the medium5,6,9. For the C4v point group, the pseudo tensor χ has non-zero elements, which results in a non-zero CPGE current35,36.

Gate dependency of the effect

Having introduced confinement and symmetry breaking by the gate electric field as the factors influencing the SOC, we separately studied these elements under the low illumination angle in order to tune the band splitting in the PbS nanosheets. Figure 3 shows the dependence of the CPGE current on the gate voltage (see also Supplementary Fig. 7). Changing the gate voltage can influence the photocurrent in two ways: First, it affects the band splitting by modification of the inversion asymmetry5,6,12. Second, the band alignment of the material with the contact metals is altered, which results in changing the extraction probability and the recombination rate of all the excited carriers including the spin-polarized ones37,38,39. The former is observable only for the CPGE current, whereas the latter is a general effect and can govern all three components of the photocurrent (J0, JCPGE, JLPGE). As a result, comparable responses to the gate can be observed for these components (Fig. 3a). In order to extract the pure gate dependence of SOC, the change in the band alignment or any other spin-independent effect should be excluded from the results. This can be done by normalizing the CPGE current by the background current6,9,16. The normalized value represents the internal tunability of the band splitting by the gate voltage.

Figure 3: Dependency of the effect on the back-gate voltage.

(a) Dependence of different components of the photocurrent on the gate voltage. Similar gate dependencies can be observed for J0, JLPGE and JCPGE (background current, linear photo-galvanic effect and circular photo-galvanic effect). (b) The measured CPGE current and its normalized value as a function of back-gate voltages for an 18 nm thick sheet. (c) Calculated (DFT) valence and conduction bands at the M point with application of different external electric fields—modelling the gate (15 layers). Σ denotes the path from Γ to M. The red and the blue colours denote the sign of the spin projection on the in-plane axis perpendicular to the Γ–M path (<SiΣ>).The valence-band maximum was set to 0 eV.

As shown in Fig. 3b, by sweeping the back-gate voltage from −8 to 8 V, the CPGE current of the nanosheets changes significantly. The gate dependency of the normalized CPGE current also shows the clear tunability of the band splitting by the gate electric field. By changing the electric field in the semiconductor channel, resulting from the back gate, the potential profile of the confined crystal can be modulated6, resulting in the modulation of the degree of reduction in symmetry. As a result, by increasing the gate voltage, a larger band splitting can be expected12, which causes a wider distribution of the carriers in momentum space and hence a higher CPGE current is generated. The DFT band structure calculations show that the strength of the gate electric field can modify the Rashba splitting of the valence and conduction bands (Fig. 3c). The gate effect is superimposed on the boundary conditions resulting from the asymmetric interfaces. Therefore, even at zero gate voltage, a CPGE current is generated (Fig. 3b). Dependency on the gate voltage is another confirmation that the vertical asymmetry is effective in the CPGE, since the vertical electric field is not expected to affect the in-plane asymmetry.

Thickness dependency of the effect

Moreover, we performed the CPGE measurements on devices based on nanosheets with three different thicknesses of 6, 9, and 18 nm to investigate the influence of the quantum confinement on the Rashba effect (Fig. 4a and Supplementary Fig. 8). By sweeping the gate voltage, it can be seen that thicker sheets produce higher CPGE currents. The character of the gate dependency for the CPGE current is similar to the background current for all devices. Since the channel dimensions (thickness and width) are different for each sample, the absorption capability of the devices is different as well. In order to make the results comparable, the CPGE normalized by the background current was calculated (Fig. 4b). The measurements indicate that by decreasing the thickness of the sheets, which corresponds to an increase of the confinement effect, structural inversion asymmetry and consequently the Rashba SOC becomes more pronounced in PbS nanosheets. Despite the different gate dependencies of the CPGE currents, all thicknesses of nanosheets show comparable gateabilities for the normalized CPGE. To clearly see the effect of the thickness on the vertical asymmetry, tunability of the normalized CPGE with the gate voltage can be observed, which is only a character of the band splitting due to the vertical asymmetry and excludes the effects of any in-plane asymmetry. As shown in Fig. 4b, the thinner the nanosheet, the more effective is the gate voltage. By sweeping the back-gate voltage from −8 to 8 V, the normalized CPGE for the 6 nm sheets changes six times more than that for the 18 nm sheets. The gate voltage and the asymmetric boundaries result in an electric field in the crystal which breaks the symmetry. The thinner the nanosheets the stronger is the effective field. By increasing the effective electric field in the crystal, splitting becomes larger, and a stronger CPGE can be detected.

Figure 4: Circular photo-galvanic current for different thicknesses.

(a) The CPGE current for 6, 9 and 18 nm thick sheets, measured as a function of the gate voltage. (b) CPGE current normalized by the background current, as a function of the gate voltage. Thinner sheets show higher gate dependencies.


A CPGE has been observed in colloidal PbS nanosheets, which could be assigned to Rashba SOC. The inversion symmetry in the rock salt crystal of bulk PbS was broken by quantum confinement, by asymmetric interfaces on two sides of the material, and by a gate electric field. The effect of these parameters was investigated experimentally, and the results were substantiated by DFT simulations of the band structure. The latter shows a splitting of the bands in momentum space, which results in an unconventional selection mechanism based on the spin of the photo-excited carriers. Our results are consistent with a higher Rashba SOC in thinner sheets. The observation of spin-related electrical transport phenomena in colloidal materials is promising in terms of future industrial applications, which supports the recently emerging spintronic approaches with simplicity, inexpensiveness and scalability of the colloidal synthesis of nanomaterials.



All chemicals were used as received: lead(II) acetate tri-hydrate (Aldrich, 99.999%), thioacetamide (Sigma-Aldrich, ≥99.0%), diphenyl ether (Aldrich, 99%+), dimethyl formamide (Sigma-Aldrich, 99.8% anhydrous), oleic acid (Aldrich, 90%), trioctylphosphine (ABCR, 97%), 1,1,2-trichloroethane (Aldrich, 96%). In a typical synthesis, a three neck 50 ml flask was used with a condenser, septum and thermocouple. 806 mg of lead acetate trihydrate (2.3 mmol) was dissolved in 10 ml of diphenyl ether. Depending on the targeted thickness, 2–10 ml of OA (5.7–28 mmol) was added. The mixture was heated to 75 °C until the solution turned clear. Then, vacuum was applied for 3.5 h to transform lead acetate into lead oleate and to remove acetic acid in the same step. The solution was heated under nitrogen flow to the desired reaction temperature of 130 °C, while at 100 °C, 0.7 ml of TCE (7.5 mmol) was added under reflux to the solution and the time has been started. After 12 min 0.23 ml of 0.04 g TAA (0.5 mmol) in 6.5 ml DMF was added to the reaction solution. After 5 min, the heat source was removed and the solution was let to cool down below 60 °C which took approximately 30 min and afterwards, centrifuged at 4,000 rpm for 3 min. The precipitant was washed two times in toluene before the nanosheets were finally suspended in toluene again for storage.

Device preparation

PbS nanosheets with lateral dimensions of up to 5 μm suspended in toluene were spin-coated on silicon wafers with 300 nm thermal silicon oxide as the gate dielectric. The highly doped silicon was used as the back gate. The individual nanosheets were contacted by e-beam lithography followed by thermal evaporation of Ti/Au (1/40 nm) and lift-off.


Immediately after device fabrication, we transferred the samples to a probe station (Lakeshore-Desert) connected to a semiconductor parameter analyser (Agilent B1500a). All the measurements have been performed in vacuum at room temperature. The vacuum chamber had a view port above the sample which is used for sample illumination. For illumination of the nanosheets, an 18 mW red laser (627 nm) with a spot size of 4 mm was used. The laser was able to excite the electrons over the band gap, while its energy was not enough for excitations to higher levels of the conduction band40. The polarization of the laser beam was controlled by a polarization filter and a quarter-wave plate.

Density functional theory simulations

Density functional theory calculations were done by employing the electronic structure code Quantum Espresso 5.2.1 (ref. 41) in combination with the PBE exchange-correlation functional28 and the PAW method. Relativistic effects (scalar- and spin–orbit coupling) were considered through the PAW potentials (Valence configuration: Pb: 5d106s26p2; S: 3s23p4) self-consistently (the used PAW potentials for lead and sulphur were taken from the pslibrary.1.0.0 downloadable at: A kinetic-energy cut-off for the wavefunction of 46 Ry and a kinetic-energy cut-off of the electronic density of 460 Ry were used. The Brillouin zone was sampled with a shifted 8 × 8 × 8 grid for bulk PbS and a shifted 8 × 8 × 1 mesh for two-dimensional (001)-PbS sheets. The default convergence thresholds were used for all calculations.

The atomic positions in the slab were allowed to relax, while the lattice constant was kept fixed at the value calculated for bulk PbS using the same computational settings (6.002 Å). SOC and dispersion interactions were not considered during the relaxation. The slabs were separated by a vacuum of 15 Å.

Band-structure calculations were carried out on those optimized structures considering SOC. External electric fields were simulated with a saw-like potential, changing along the surface normal. A larger vacuum layer (20 Å) was used, and the decrease of the saw-like potential to its initial value was set to be in the middle of the vacuum. Symmetry was not used to reduce the number of k points during the self-consistent field calculation.

The projected density of states resolved on the band structure was calculated using a Gaussian smearing with a broadening of 0.0001 Ry. The projected density of states was summed over all atoms for any type of orbital.

Data availability

All the theoretical and experimental data supporting this study are available from the corresponding author.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Ramin Moayed, M. M. et al. Towards colloidal spintronics through Rashba spin-orbit interaction in lead sulphide nanosheets. Nat. Commun. 8, 15721 doi: 10.1038/ncomms15721 (2017).

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1

    Normile, D. The end—not here yet, but coming soon. Science 293, 787 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Mack, C. A. in Proc. SPIE 5037, Emerging Lithographic Technologies VII (ed. Engelstad R. L. Vol. 5037, 1Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers.

  3. 3

    Waldrop, M. M. More than Moore. Nature 530, 144–147 (2016).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Zeng, H., Dai, J., Yao, W., Xiao, D. & Cui, X. Valley polarization in MoS2 monolayers by optical pumping. Nat. Nanotech. 7, 490–493 (2012).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Zhang, S. et al. Generation of Rashba spin–orbit coupling in CdSe nanowire by ionic liquid gate. Nano Lett. 15, 1152–1157 (2015).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Yin, C. et al. Tunable surface electron spin splitting with electric double-layer transistors based on InN. Nano Lett. 13, 2024–2029 (2013).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Kohda, M. et al. Gate-controlled persistent spin helix state in (In,Ga) as quantum wells. Phys. Rev. B 86, 081306 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Datta, S. & Das, B. Electronic analog of the electro‐optic modulator. Appl. Phys. Lett. 56, 665 (1990).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Zhang, Q. et al. Strong circular photogalvanic effect in ZnO epitaxial films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 041907 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    He, X. W. et al. Circular photogalvanic effect of the two-dimensional electron gas in Al x Ga 1−x N/GaN heterostructures under uniaxial strain. Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 071912 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Eginligil, M. et al. Dichroic spin–valley photocurrent in monolayer molybdenum disulphide. Nat. Commun. 6, 7636 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Yuan, H. et al. Generation and electric control of spin–valley coupled circular photogalvanic current in WSe2 . Nat. Nanotech. 9, 851–857 (2014).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Mak, K. F., He, K., Shan, J. & Heinz, T. F. Control of valley polarization in monolayer MoS2 by optical helicity. Nat. Nanotech. 7, 494–498 (2012).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Yao, W., Xiao, D. & Niu, Q. Valley-dependent optoelectronics from inversion symmetry breaking. Phys. Rev. B 77, 235406 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Xiao, D., Liu, G., Feng, W., Xu, X. & Yao, W. Coupled spin and valley physics in monolayers of MoS2 and other group-VI dichalcogenides. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 196802 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Dhara, S., Mele, E. J. & Agarwal, R. Voltage-tunable circular photogalvanic effect in silicon nanowires. Science 349, 726–729 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Dogan, S., Bielewicz, T., Cai, Y. & Klinke, C. Field-effect transistors made of individual colloidal PbS nanosheets. Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 073102 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Dogan, S., Bielewicz, T., Lebedeva, V. & Klinke, C. Photovoltaic effect in individual asymmetrically contacted lead sulfide nanosheets. Nanoscale 7, 4875–4883 (2015).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Bielewicz, T. et al. From dots to stripes to sheets: shape control of lead sulfide nanostructures. Chem. Mater. 27, 8248–8254 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Bielewicz, T., Dogan, S. & Klinke, C. Tailoring the height of ultrathin PbS nanosheets and their application as field-effect transistors. Small 11, 826–833 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Wu, S. et al. Electrical tuning of valley magnetic moment through symmetry control in bilayer MoS2 . Nat. Phys. 9, 149–153 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Schliehe, C. et al. Ultrathin PbS sheets by two-dimensional oriented attachment. Science 329, 550–553 (2010).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Aerts, M. et al. Highly efficient carrier multiplication in PbS nanosheets. Nat. Commun. 5, 3789 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    McIver, J., Hsieh, W., Steinberg, D., Jarillo-Herrero, H. & Gedik, P. N., Control over topological insulator photocurrents with light polarization. Nat. Nanotech. 7, 96–100 (2012).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Karch, J. et al. Terahertz radiation driven chiral edge currents in graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 276601 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Dyakonov M. I. ed. Spin Physics in Semiconductors, vol. 157 of Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences Springer-Verlag (2008).

  27. 27

    Rodin, A. S., Gomes, L. C., Carvalho, A. & Castro Neto, A. H. Valley physics in tin (II) sulfide. Phys. Rev. B 93, 045431 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Svane, A. et al. Quasiparticle self-consistent GW calculations for PbS, PbSe, and PbTe: Band structure and pressure coefficients. Phys. Rev. B 81, 245120 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Hummer, K., Grüneis, A. & Kresse, G. Structural and electronic properties of lead chalcogenides from first principles. Phys. Rev. B 75, 195211 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Ma, Y., Dai, Y., Yin, N., Jing, T. & Huang, B. Ideal two-dimensional systems with a gain Rashba-type spin splitting: SrFBiS2 and BiOBiS2 nanosheets. J. Mater. Chem. C 2, 8539–8545 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Eremeev, S. V., Tsirkin, S. S., Nechaev, I. A., Echenique, P. M. & Chulkov, E. V. New generation of two-dimensional spintronic systems realized by coupling of Rashba and Dirac fermions. Sci. Rep. 5, 12819 (2015).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Shanavas, K. V. & Satpathy, S. Electric field tuning of the Rashba effect in the polar perovskite structures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 086802 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Liu, J., Qian, X. & Fu, L. Crystal field effect induced topological crystalline insulators in monolayer IV–VI semiconductors. Nano Lett. 15, 2657–2661 (2015).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Ganichev, S. D. & Golub, L. E. Interplay of Rashba/Dresselhaus spin splittings probed by photogalvanic spectroscopy—a review. Phys. Status Solidi B 251, 1801–1823 (2014).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Vajna, S. z. et al. Higher-order contributions to the Rashba-Bychkov effect with application to the Bi/Ag(111) surface alloy. Phys. Rev. B 85, 075404 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Vélez, S. et al. Gate-tunable diode and photovoltaic effect in an organic–2D layered material p–n junction. Nanoscale 7, 15442–15449 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Hong, T. et al. Polarized photocurrent response in black phosphorus field-effect transistors. Nanoscale 6, 8978–8983 (2014).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Chen, C., Zhang, W., Kong, E. S. & Zhang, Y. Carbon nanotube photovoltaic device with asymmetrical contacts. Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 263501 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    Herman, F., Kortum, R., Ortenburger, I. & Van Dyke, J. P. Relativistic band structure of GeTe, SnTe, PbTe, PbSe, and PbS. J. Phys. Colloques 29, C4-62–C4-77 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41

    Giannozzi, P. et al. QUANTUM ESPRESSO: a modular and open-source software project for quantumsimulations of materials. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 21, 395502–395520 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


M.M.R.M., T.B. and C.K. gratefully acknowledge financial support of the European Research Council via the ERC Starting Grant ‘2D-SYNETRA’ (Seventh Framework Program FP7, Project: 304980). C.K. thanks the German Research Foundation DFG for financial support in the frame of the Cluster of Excellence ‘Center of ultrafast imaging CUI’ and the Heisenberg scholarship KL 1453/9-2. M.S.Z. and C.H. thank the DFG for funding via the project SFB668 (project B17) and the North-German Supercomputing Alliance (HLRN) for computational resources. The authors thank Vladimiro Mujica (Arizona State University) for discussion and Sascha Kull for support in the synthesis of the nanosheets.

Author information




M.M.R.M. and C.K. conceived the main concepts. M.M.R.M. designed the experiments, prepared the samples and performed the electrical measurements. T.B. performed the nanosheets synthesis and characterization. M.S.Z. and C.H. performed the simulations and theoretical analysis of the results. M.M.R.M., T.B., M.S.Z., C.H. and C.K. wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Klinke.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures and Supplementary References (PDF 946 kb)

Peer Review File (PDF 538 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ramin Moayed, M., Bielewicz, T., Zöllner, M. et al. Towards colloidal spintronics through Rashba spin-orbit interaction in lead sulphide nanosheets. Nat Commun 8, 15721 (2017).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing