Due to their well-defined three-dimensional geometry, spiro compounds are widely utilized in drug research. From the central tetrahedral carbon atom, besides the regular structure, an inverted spiro connectivity may be envisioned. Here we disclose the synthesis of this molecule class that we have coined quasicatenanes. Next to their fascinating and aesthetic shape, the higher compactness as compared to regular spiro bicycles is noteworthy. To enable synthetic access to compact entangled multimacrocyclic molecules, we have developed a new strategy. The key element is a template, which is covalently connected to the linear precursors, and spatially directs the sterically congested backfolding macrocyclizations that are required to give quasicatenanes. Similarly, quasirotaxanes are made.
Entangled molecular architectures inspire synthetic chemists for creative endeavours and find application in nanotechnology and materials research1. Striking natural examples are the lasso peptides2, and also catenane structures found in some proteins3 and DNA4. Synthetically, an impressive array of entangled molecules such as catenanes and rotaxanes have been made that are mainly applied in nanotechnology research1. Supramolecular three-dimensional templating via metal coordination, π-stacking or hydrogen bonding as developed by the respective Sauvage5/Leigh6, Stoddart7,8 and Hunter9/Vögtle10 groups gave access to the vast majority of the catenane and rotaxane series11. However, the prerequisite of moieties able to form non-covalent interactions limits the structural diversity of the entangled molecules that can be obtained. Remarkably, the first example of a non-statistical catenane synthesis was reported back in 1964 by Schill and Lüttringhaus12 using a covalent approach12,13,14. Over the past years, there has been a comeback of covalent approaches towards entangled structures15,16,17,18,19. Currently, we are developing covalent template-directed synthetic concepts to disclose unknown or ‘impossible’20 entangled or mechanically interlocked molecular geometries with access to the natural rotaxane-type lasso peptide series as the ultimate goal21. Here we report a synthetic concept based on template-directed backfolding macrocyclization of which the utility is demonstrated by the efficient synthesis of an uncommon spiro geometry22. The regular spiro geometry is obtained after connection of two rings to the same core tetrahedral carbon atom and can be considered as the molecular equivalent of the figure of eight23. The fascinating spirocyclic geometry is found in many natural compounds and due to their rigid and well-defined three-dimensional shape, characterized by a perpendicular arrangement of the two rings, spiro compounds find wide application in drug research24. Besides the regular geometry (as for structure 1, Fig. 1), an alternative connectivity may be envisioned by backfolding of the two rings at the central tetrahedral carbon atom to give an inverted spiro configuration (that is, 2, Fig. 1). An intermediate in the landmark catenane synthesis by the Schill group already displayed a similar inverted spiro geometry12. Despite the fact that both spiro geometries do not contain any stereocentre, they are still interesting from a stereochemical point of view. Uniquely, in the spiro connectivity case, after inverting the centre-of-symmetry tetrahedral carbon, a diastereomer is obtained with different properties while retaining the C2 symmetry around the same axis. Although we realize that every name is a compromise because no mechanical bond is present, we coined the topologically trivial inverted spiro geometry a quasicatenane 2 (ref. 25). Similarly, a quasirotaxane 3 can be drawn, of which unwinding to give conformer 4 is prevented by large stoppers (Fig. 1).
For steric reasons, the synthesis of the quasicatenane 2 and quasirotaxane 3 architectures requires specifically tailored methodologies. We have tackled this challenge, as will be pointed out first for quasicatenane 2, by using a covalent template directing the required backfolding cyclization. Template 6 (Fig. 2, route A) will be temporarily connected to two of the four linear ring precursors in 5 and will eventually be part of the spirocyclic ring formed with the other precursor chains. Due to the tetrahedral geometry of the central carbon atom, cyclization of the first ring on the template in 7 will occur in a perpendicular and backfolded fashion over the linear precursor of the second ring to form a pseudo-quasirotaxane 8 (ref. 26). Subsequent backfolding cyclization of the second ring to give the inverted spiro connectivity, followed by cleavage of the temporal scaffolding bonds provides bicyclic quasicatenane 2. Essentially, spiro quasicatenane 2 may be obtained from the tetrahedral precursor 5 in just four steps, of which three are macrocyclizations27. Without making the temporal connections to the template, the regular spiro bicycle 1 will be obtained (Fig. 2, routes B and C). An alternative route to the regular spiro bicycle 1 opens up after breaking the temporary bonds in 8 (Fig. 2, route D), initiating unwinding of the sterically congested quasi-thread fragment to give 10, followed by closure of the second ring. Capping the end-groups in pseudo-quasirotaxane 8 by large stoppers (Fig. 2, route E) to give 12 prevents the unwinding process after temporal bond cleavage to give quasirotaxane 3. Stopper attachment to 10 (Fig. 2, route F) gives the sterically relaxed conformer 4.
Design of the building blocks
To avoid the requirement of protective groups and to facilitate the sterically difficult macrocyclizations, robust transformations were selected, that is, transesterification/lactonization28 for the scaffolding temporal connection to the template, Cu-catalysed azide alkyne cycloaddition29,30 (CuAAC) for the first ring closure and olefin metathesis31 for the second and final ring closure or introduction of the quasi-rotaxane stopper elements. For synthetic reasons and to ensure the perpendicular mutual arrangement of the two pairs of ring-precursor chains at precursor 5, we have chosen a spiro-linkage via the tetrahedral carbon atom of a 9H-fluorene moiety (Fig. 3)32. The design of the temporal covalent scaffolding tether at the central precursor 5 is based on amide-N-benzylic moieties containing phenolic hydroxyl groups that will be esterified to template 6 and may be removed from the final spiro or rotaxane compounds by consecutive transesterification and protolytic cleavage of the amide benzylic linkages33. As the template, 2,5-bis(pent-4-yn-1-yloxy)-1,4-benzenedicarboxylic ester 6 was chosen. The tether length in precursor 5 and template 6 gives access to spiro architectures of 27- and 31-membered rings, resulting from CuAAC and ring-closing metathesis (RCM) macrocyclizations, respectively. These ring sizes are significantly larger than the smallest accessible rotaxane ring fragment of 21 atoms and in the same range as the natural peptide rotaxanes34. For mechanically locking the conformation of the 31-membered ring of the quasirotaxane by cross-metathesis, we selected tris(4-(tert-butyl)phenyl)methane-functionalized acrylamide 11 as the stopper element35. For the multigram scale synthesis of the central tetrahedral precursor 5, template 6 and rotaxane stopper 11, please see the Supplementary Information.
Synthesis of the quasicatenane
We first followed the strategy to quasicatenane 2 incorporating the inverted spiro[27,31] framework (Fig. 2, route A). Connection of 5 via transesterification of the pentafluorophenol ester 6a using Cs2CO3 as the base in acetonitrile (2 mM) gave the 21-membered macrocyclic bislactone 7 in 69% isolated yield (Fig. 4a). The subsequent backfolding double CuAAC reactions required careful optimization to avoid competing intermolecular reactions over the challenging process to the 31-membered cage-type macrocycle36. Slow addition of a 5 mM solution of 7 to a solution of CuI (2 equiv) and DIPEA/lutidine (4 equiv) in acetonitrile gave 8 in poor and irreproducible yields due to extensive insoluble polymer formation. Simply stirring a 5 mM dichloromethane solution of 7 at reflux for 24 h using tetrakis(acetonitrile)copper(I)tetrafluoroborate (0.25 equiv) and tris[(1-benzyl-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methyl]amine (TBTA, 0.25 equiv) as the catalytic complex gave, after work-up and purification, 8 in a 79% reproducible yield37. The final backfolding closure of the 27-membered cycloalkene via RCM using Grubbs’ second-generation catalyst at high dilution (1 mM) in dichloromethane at reflux gave the tricyclic product in an isolated yield of 71% as a mixture of E/Z isomers. As a coeluting side product, the liquid chromatography mass spectrometry trace also showed some presence of the 26-membered cycloalkene analogue, due to double bond migration before cyclization38. After removal of the temporary tether by consecutive transesterification using NaOMe and trifluoroacetic acid (TFA)/Et3SiH-mediated protolytic cleavage of the benzylic linkages, the quasicatenane 2 was isolated in a last-three-steps yield of 66%. 1H NMR studies confirmed the solution phase C2-symmetric conformation of the inverted spiro quasicatenane 2 as drawn in Fig. 4a. Most protons of the nine pairs of cycloalkene methylene protons gave well-separated signals. In addition, the strong nOe contacts between the fluorene 8 and 8′ protons and the majority of the aliphatic protons of the macrocycloalkene confirm the folding of the macrocycle over the fluorene moiety (see Supplementary Information). Fortunately, after catalytic hydrogenation to remove the alkene E/Z mixture, crystals of 2-H2 could be obtained of sufficient quality for X-ray diffraction (Fig. 4b). Besides unequivocal proof of the backfolded quasicatenane configuration, the solid-state structure showed a similar conformation as in solution, albeit with the flexible C20-macrocycloalkane offset folded over the fluorene moiety.
Next, the regular spiro[27,31] macrobicycle 1 was made. Ironically, initial attempts were troublesome. Subjection of 5 to the high-dilution RCM macrocyclization conditions (Fig. 2, route B) led to complex and inseparable mixtures. Fortunately, by beginning with the CuAAC reaction from 5 and 6b, monocycle 10 was obtained, although in a yield of 42% only (Fig. 4a, route C). It should be noted that this yield is significantly lower than the CuAAC reactions to 8 that both occurred in a template/scaffold-preorganized intramolecular fashion. As an elegant detour, monocycle 10 could be obtained quantitatively after methoxide-induced cleavage of the tether in pseudo-quasirotaxane 8 inducing immediate steric relaxation (Fig. 4a, route D). By lowering the temperature to 30 °C at high dilution, the RCM reaction proceeded cleanly and no truncated cycloalkene was observed. Protolytic removal of the 2-hydroxy-4-methoxybenzyl groups led to an unexpectedly stable adduct of TFA and 1, which could not be separated. However, treatment with methanolic 3 M HCl at 50 °C gave a clean removal of the benzyl groups and the resulting triazolium ions were neutralized with aqueous NaHCO3 to give the regular spiro macrocycle 1 in a yield of 51%. Catalytic hydrogenation removed the RCM-derived olefin E/Z mixture to give 1-H2. The different geometries of 1-H2 and 2-H2 are obvious from the 1H NMR spectra (Fig. 5) showing almost no overlapping signals. In quasicatenane 2 especially, the four pairs of methylene protons (Fig. 5, protons f–i) experience an upfield shift to the 0.5 p.p.m. region due to their presence in the shielding region above the plane of the aromatic fluorene phenyl groups. For the same reason, a dramatic upfield shift of over 3 p.p.m. of the NH triplets (Fig. 5, protons k) of 2 is observed. The inverted spiro geometry in 2 is also reflected by the hydrogen bonds between the triazole CH’s (Fig. 5, protons s) and the amide carbonyls resulting in a 0.8 p.p.m. downfield shield as compared to the same protons in regular spiro compound 1. In addition, donor–acceptor distances in the crystal structure of 2.2 and 2.4 Å, respectively, show these hydrogen bonds in the solid state of 2. The different chromatographic retention times of the two spiro diastereomers visualizes the different physical properties showing a higher polarity for the densely packed quasicatenane 2.
Synthesis of the quasirotaxane
The backfolded intermediate 8 also provides access to quasirotaxane 3 (Fig. 4c). Cross-metathesis39 of the terminal thread alkenes in 8 with the acrylamide-functionalized stopper 11, followed by tether detachment by consecutive transesterification and protolysis gave quasirotaxane 3 in a yield of 39% over three steps. The unthreaded conformation 4 was obtained via cross-metathesis-mediated stopper attachment to unwound intermediate 10 and protolytic debenzylation in a two-step yield of 28%. The structural dissimilarity between the quasirotaxane 3 and conformer 4 was reflected by comparing the 1H NMR spectra showing, as in the quasicatenane series, remarkable shift differences, especially for the methylene protons in the thread fragment close to the fluorene moiety, the central amide NH’s and the triazole proton (Fig. 5). Quasirotaxane 3 and the unwound isomer 4 only differ in conformation of which interconversion is mechanically blocked by the stoppers. In contrast to the very facile unwinding of the pseudo-thread in 8 through the 31-membered ring to give 10 (Fig. 4a, route D), the tris(4-(tert-butyl)phenyl)methane stoppered quasirotaxane 3 conformation was completely stable, even after heating in dimethylsulphoxide at 110 °C for 18 h as was confirmed by 1H NMR spectroscopy.
Generally, spiro compounds are obtained after two ring closures of the four linear-chain ring precursors connected to a central tetrahedral carbon atom. We have shown that after prior temporal covalent connection via a template of two of the four ring-precursor chains, ring closure of the second pair to the template is forced in a backfolded fashion. Final closure of the first pair of ring-precursor chains followed by cleavage of the temporary linkers to the template provides an inverted spiro geometry coined here as a quasicatenane. Although the regular spiro and quasicatenane geometries only differ by inversion of the configuration of the centre-of-symmetry tetrahedral carbon, they relate as diastereomers with inherently different physical properties as reflected by their contrasting 1H NMR spectra. By starting from the same tetrahedral carbon-centred acyclic precursor and the same backfolding concept, the structurally related mechanically locked quasirotaxane and its unwound conformer were obtained. The next step in the backfolding cyclization concept will be replacing the permanent perpendicular spiro connectivity by structurally similar but cleavable moieties, such as a 1,3-dioxolane, to give rotaxanes and catenanes. The longer-term goal is to apply the covalent tether-directed backfolding cyclization concept to synthetically disclose the natural rotaxane-type lasso peptide series by incorporation of two amides of the thread section of the peptide backbone into a imidazolidin-4-one as the perpendicular and cleavable thread/ring connecting moiety. Covalent linking in a perpendicular fashion of the ring over thread fragment, as is the case with the backfolding cyclization concept, ensures the atom-precise mutual positioning of these components, which is a prerequisite for the eventual total synthesis of the lasso peptides.
Macrolactonization of the tetrahedral precursor 5 to template 6a
5 (1.94 g, 1.89 mmol), 6a (1.38 g, 2.08 mmol, 1.1 equiv), Cs2CO3 (2.45 g, 7.58 mmol, 4 equiv) and 4 Å molecular sieves (1.00 g) were dissolved in dry CH3CN (750 ml) and the mixture was stirred overnight at 60 °C under a N2 atmosphere. The solvent was evaporated and the residue was taken in ca. 20 ml CH2Cl2 and filtered through a plug of Celite, which was washed with CH2Cl2. The organic layer was concentrated in vacuo and dry-loaded on silica and purified by column chromatography (petroleum ether (PE):EtOAc 4:1→3:1) to give 7 (1.72 g, 1.31 mmol, 69%) as a thick colourless oil.
Double CuAAC macrocyclizations towards cage 8
7 (420 mg, 0.319 mmol) and TBTA (42 mg, 0.080 mmol, 0.25 equiv) were dissolved in 65 ml dry CH2Cl2 and degassed with 5 vacuum/N2 cycles, after which Cu(CH3CN)4BF4 (25 mg, 0.080 mmol, 0.25 equiv) was added and the mixture was stirred overnight at reflux under N2 atmosphere. The reaction mixture was concentrated in vacuo and dry-loaded on silica and purified by column chromatography (PE:EtOAc 1:1→1:2→0:1) to give 8 (333 mg, 0.253 mmol, 79%) as a colourless foam.
Ring-closing metathesis to the pseudo-quasicatenane
8 (79 mg, 0.060 mmol) was dissolved in dry CH2Cl2 (60 ml) and degassed with 5 vacuum/N2 cycles. To the solution was added Grubbs second-generation catalyst (10 mg, 0.012 mmol, 0.2 equiv) and the mixture was stirred overnight at 40 °C. The mixture was concentrated in vacuo, dry-loaded on silica and purified by column chromatography (PE:EtOAc 1:2→1:3→1:4) to give the pseudo-quasicatenane (55 mg, 0.0427, mmol, 71%) as a beige solid.
Temporary tether removal to liberate quasicatenane 2
The pseudo-quasicatenane (55 mg, 0.043 mmol) was dissolved in dry THF/CH3OH (2 ml, 1:1) and anhydrous NaOCH3 (12 mg, 0.21 mmol, 5 equiv) was added and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 1 h. The reaction was quenched by addition of 0.5 ml AcOH and the reaction was diluted with 15 ml EtOAc and 10 ml saturated NaHCO3. The water layer was extracted with 2 × 5 ml EtOAc and the combined organic layers were dried over MgSO4 and concentrated in vacuo to give the dimethyl ester (58 mg, 0.0427, mmol, quantitative) as a slight yellow film. To this, TFA/CH2Cl2 (5 ml, 9:1) and Et3SiH (0.136 ml, 0.854 mmol, 20 equiv) were added. The mixture was stirred overnight at room temperature and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (10 ml) and Et3N (0.5 ml) was added and stirred for 5 min. The organic layers were washed with 1 M HCl (10 ml), saturated NaHCO3 (10 ml), dried over MgSO4 and concentrated in vacuo. The crude product was dry-loaded on silica and purified by column chromatography (CH2Cl2/CH3OH 96:4→94:6) to give 2 (43 mg, 0.040 mmol, 93%) as a colourless foam.
Additional data supporting the findings reported in this article are available within the Supplementary Information file. For the experimental procedures and spectral data of all compounds described, see the Supplementary Methods. For 1H and 13C NMR spectra of all compounds, see Supplementary Figs 5–71. CCDC 1517772 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for compound 2-H2. These data can be obtained free of charge from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.
How to cite this article: Steemers, L. et al. Synthesis of spiro quasicatenanes and quasirotaxanes via a templated backfolding strategy. Nat. Commun. 8, 15392 doi: 10.1038/ncomms15392 (2017).
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Xue, M., Yang, Y., Chi, X., Yan, X. & Huang, F. Development of pseudorotaxanes and rotaxanes: from synthesis to stimuli-responsive motions to applications. Chem. Rev. 115, 7398–7501 (2015).
Hegemann, J. D., Zimmerman, M., Xie, X. & Marahiel, M. A. Lasso peptides: an intriguing class of bacterial natural products. Acc. Chem. Res. 48, 1909–1919 (2015).
Taylor, W. R. A deeply knotted protein structure and how it might fold. Nature 406, 916–919 (2000).
Dean, F. B., Stasiak, A., Koller, T. & Cozzarelli, N. R. Duplex DNA knots produced by Escherichia coli topoisomerase I. Structure and requirements for formation. J. Biol. Chem. 260, 4975–4983 (1985).
Dietrich-Buchecker, C. O., Sauvage, J. P. & Kintzinger, J. P. Une nouvelle famille de molécules: les métallo-caténanes. Tetrahedron Lett. 24, 5095–5098 (1983).
Crowley, J. D., Goldup, S. M., Lee, A.-L., Leigh, D. A. & McBurney, R. T. Active metal template synthesis of rotaxanes, catenanes and molecular shuttles. Chem. Soc. Rev. 38, 1530–1541 (2009).
Odell, B. et al. Cyclobis(paraquat-p-phenylene). A tetracationic multipurpose receptor. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 27, 1547–1550 (1988).
Ashton, P. R. et al. Self-assembling - and rotaxanes from secondary dialkylammonium salts and crown ethers. Chem. Eur. J. 2, 729–736 (1996).
Hunter, C. A. & Purvis, D. H. A binary quinone receptor. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 31, 792–795 (1992).
Vögtle, F., Dünnwald, T. & Schmidt, T. Catenanes and rotaxanes of the amide type. Acc. Chem. Res. 29, 451–460 (1996).
Gil-Ramírez, G. & Leigh, D. A. Catenanes: fifty years of molecular links. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 6110–6150 (2015).
Schill, G. & Lüttringhaus, A. The preparation of catena compounds by directed synthesis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 3, 546–547 (1964).
Schill, G. & Zollenkopf, H. Justus. Rotaxan verbindungen. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 721, 53–74 (1969).
Schill, G. Catenanes, Rotaxanes and Knots Academic Press (1971).
Ünsal, Ö. & Godt, A. Synthesis of a catenane with functionalities and 87-membered rings. Chem. Eur. J. 5, 1728–1733 (1999).
Hiratani, K. et al. A new synthetic method for rotaxanes via tandem Claisen rearrangement, diesterification, and aminolysis. Tetrahedron Lett. 43, 5747–5750 (2002).
Sugino, H., Kawai, H., Umehara, T., Fujiwara, K. & Suzuki, T. Effects of axle-core, macrocycle, and side-station structures on the threading and hydrolysis processes of imine-bridged rotaxanes. Chem. Eur. J. 18, 13722–13732 (2012).
Schweez, C., Shuskov, P., Grimme, S. & Höger, S. Synthesis and dynamics of nanosized phenylene-ethynylene-butadiynylene rotaxanes and the role of shape persistence. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 3328–3333 (2016).
Cantin, K., Lafleur-Lambert, A., Dufour, P. & Morin, J. F. Studies toward the synthesis of phenylacetylene macrocycle based rotaxane precursors as building blocks for organic nanotubes. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 5335–5349 (2012).
Hannam, J. S. et al. Controlled submolecular translational motion in synthesis: a mechanically interlocking auxiliary. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 43, 3260–3264 (2004).
Allen, C. D. & Link, A. J. Self-assembly of catenanes from lasso peptides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 14214–14217 (2016).
Zheng, Y., Tice, C. M. & Singh, S. B. The use of spirocyclic scaffolds in drug discovery. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 24, 3673–3682 (2014).
Megan, M. et al. Stereochemistry of molecular figures-of-eight. Chem. Eur. J. 18, 10312–10323 (2012).
Smith, L. K. & Baxendale, I. R. Total syntheses of natural products containing spirocarbocycles. Org. Biomol. Chem. 13, 9907–9933 (2015).
Sauvage, J. P. Interlacing molecular threads on transition metals: catenands, catenates, and knots. Acc. Chem. Res. 23, 319–327 (1990).
Vohlıdal, J. et al. Terminology and nomenclature for macromolecular rotaxanes and pseudorotaxanes. Pure Appl. Chem. 84, 2135–2165 (2012).
Martí-Centelles, V., Pandey, M. D., Burguete, M. I. & Luis, S. V. Macrocyclization reactions: the importance of conformational, configurational, and template-induced preorganization. Chem. Rev. 115, 8736–8834 (2015).
Parenty, A., Moreau, X., Niel, G. & Campagne, J. M. Update 1 of: macrolactonizations in the total synthesis of natural products. Chem. Rev. 113, PR1–PR40 (2013).
Rostovtsev, V. V., Green, L. G., Fokin, V. V. & Sharpless, K. B. A stepwise Huisgen cycloaddition process: copper(I)-catalyzed regioselective ‘ligation’ of azides and terminal alkynes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 41, 2596–2599 (2002).
Tornøe, C. W., Christensen, C. & Meldal, M. Peptidotriazoles on solid phase: [1,2,3]-triazoles by regiospecific copper(I)-catalyzed 1,3-dipolar cycloadditions of terminal alkynes to azides. J. Org. Chem. 67, 3057–3064 (2002).
Trnka, T. M. & Grubbs, R. H. The development of L2X2Ru=CHR olefin metathesis catalysts: an organometallic success story. Acc. Chem. Res. 34, 18–29 (2001).
Abbel, R., Schenning, A. P. H. J. & Meijer, E. W. Fluorene-based materials and their supramolecular properties. J. Polym. Sci. A 47, 4215–4233 (2009).
Packman, L. C. N-2-hydroxy-4-methoxybenzyl (Hmb) backbone protection strategy prevents double aspartimide formation in a ‘difficult’ peptide sequence. Tetrahedron Lett. 36, 7523–7526 (1995).
Dasgupta, S. & Wu, J. Formation of rotaxanes by encircling ,  and crown ethers onto the dibenzylammonium dumbbell. Chem. Sci. 3, 425–432 (2012).
Gibson, H. W. et al. New triarylmethyl derivatives: ‘blocking groups’ for rotaxanes and polyrotaxanes. J. Org. Chem. 58, 3748–3756 (1993).
Chouhan, G. & James, K. CuAAC macrocyclization: high intramolecular selectivity through the use of copper–tris(triazole) ligand complexes. Org. Lett. 13, 2754–2757 (2011).
Chan, T. R., Hilgraf, R., Sharpless, K. B. & Fokin, V. V. Polytriazoles as copper(I)-stabilizing ligands in catalysis. Org. Lett. 6, 2853–2855 (2004).
Fürstner, A., Thiel, O. R., Ackermann, L., Schanz, H.-J. & Nolan, S. P. Ruthenium carbene complexes with N,N′-bis(mesityl)imidazol-2-ylidene ligands: RCM catalysts of extended scope. J. Org. Chem. 65, 2204–2207 (2000).
Choi, T. L., Chatterjee, A. K. & Grubbs, R. H. Synthesis of α,β-unsaturated amides by olefin cross-metathesis. Angew. Chem. Intl. Ed 113, 1317–1319 (2001).
The Netherlands Research Council (NWO) is acknowledged for financial support (ECHO-Grant 711.012.009) to J.H.v.M. and for financing the X-ray diffractometer. We thank E. Zuidinga and J.M. Ernsting for high-resolution mass spectrometry and NMR analysis. C. van Tilburg (Mercachem B.V., Nijmegen, The Netherlands) is thanked for the purification of quasirotaxane 3. L. van Maarseveen and T. Slot are acknowledged for the artwork in Figs 1, 2, 3.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
About this article
Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry (2019)
Chemical Communications (2019)
Journal of Molecular Structure (2019)
Trends in Chemistry (2019)
RSC Advances (2019)