Abundant molecular oxygen was discovered in the coma of comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko. Its origin was ascribed to primordial gaseous O2 incorporated into the nucleus during the comet’s formation. This thesis was put forward after discounting several O2 production mechanisms in comets, including photolysis and radiolysis of water, solar wind–surface interactions and gas-phase collisions. Here we report an original Eley–Rideal reaction mechanism, which permits direct O2 formation in single collisions of energetic water ions with oxidized cometary surface analogues. The reaction proceeds by H2O+ abstracting a surface O-atom, then forming an excited precursor state, which dissociates to produce O2−. Subsequent photo-detachment leads to molecular O2, whose presence in the coma may thus be linked directly to water molecules and their interaction with the solar wind. This abiotic O2 production mechanism is consistent with reported trends in the 67P coma and raises awareness of the role of energetic negative ions in comets.
Although oxygen is the third most abundant element in the universe, its molecular form (dioxygen, O2) is very rare. Molecular oxygen has only been detected in two interstellar clouds, the Orion Nebula1 and the ρ Oph A dense core2. In contrast to Earth, where oxygenic photosynthesis has made O2 abundant, only tenuous amounts of dioxygen are found elsewhere in our solar system, for example, in the moons of Jupiter3, Saturn4 and on Mars5. Remarkably, molecular oxygen was detected recently in the coma of comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko by the Rosetta spacecraft, with local O2 abundances ranging between 1 and 10% relative to water6. The O2 was proposed to be of primordial origin in conflict with Solar System formation theories6.
Understanding the origin of molecular oxygen in space is important for the evolution of the Universe and the origin of life on Earth7,8,9. In fact, molecular oxygen in abundance has been suggested as a promising biomarker10. Interstellar and cometary oxygen is strongly bound chemically to other elements in compounds, such as H2O, CO2, CO, silicates and metal oxides. Release of O2 from these reservoirs is practically difficult and energetically very expensive. Energetic particles, such as photons, electrons and ions, exist in abundance in astrophysical environments and can initiate dissociation reactions that ultimately produce O2. Apropos, photolysis and radiolysis of water, solar wind interactions with the nucleus surface, and gas-phase collisions in the coma have been considered but found deficient in explaining the origin of O2 in the coma of comet 67P (ref. 6). Despite their cometary abundance, energetic molecular ions such as H2O+ and H3O+ have not been discussed in the context of O2 production.
When energetic molecules collide with surfaces, they may dissociate promptly, undergo electronic excitation or participate in surface reactions. The latter include Eley–Rideal (ER) reactions, where energetic projectiles collide with surfaces and react with adsorbates to produce projectile-adsorbate molecules without equilibration with the surface11. This dynamic process is driven by the projectile energy, a large fraction of which is carried away by the product molecule. Despite the implied similarity, the ER reaction process is different from sputtering (physical ejection of surface matter): a targeted new bond is formed, typically at hyperthermal incidence energies (10–200 eV). Notably, ER reactions have no surface temperature dependence and thus could be important in cometary environments during active periods, when energetic molecular ions are generated through interactions with the solar wind. Indeed, ‘accelerated’ water ions have been discovered in the inner coma of comet 67P (refs 12, 13). These ions possess kinetic energy between 120 and 800 eV, and impact and sputter the nucleus surface at fluxes comparable to the typical solar wind flux13. The outer crust of the 67P nucleus facing the Sun is dehydrated14, thus exposing mineral surfaces to the ions. Minerals found on the comet, such as olivine and pyroxene silicates15,16 and Fe/Ni oxides17, are oxidized offering another potential source of oxygen. Thus, collisions of energetic water ions with oxidized minerals on the nucleus surface are probable, with several possible outcomes: (1) collision-induced dissociation (CID) of H2O+ produces atomic O, atomic H and OH radicals and ions; (2) physical sputtering ejects mineral constituents, including metal and oxygen atoms; and (3) collisional excitation of H2O+ drives an intramolecular water-splitting reaction18, producing molecular H2 directly. But there is also a surprising forth outcome.
We have discovered and verified in laboratory experiments that energetic water ions can also participate in ER abstraction reactions on oxidized surfaces to directly form molecular O2 anions. When oxygen is abstracted from such surfaces, it is readily replenished by (a) O fragments from the CID of H2O+ and (b) freshly exposed O atoms from physical sputtering of the mineral surface by H2O+. Thus, the ER reaction mechanism may generate O2− continually on the cometary surface, which is emitted into the coma with high kinetic energy.
O2 − and HO2 − production on cometary surface analogues
We first demonstrate the production of molecular oxygen and hydroperoxyl radicals, detected as anions, from H2O+ ions bombarding Si, and Fe targets. These surfaces are covered with amorphous native oxide (hereafter SiOx and FeOy), selected as analogues of two inorganic minerals commonly found on comets. Scattering on these surfaces produces multiple species from dissociation and physical sputtering, but also from direct reactions. Negative ion formation (Supplementary Figs 1 and 2) is of particular interest, since surface scattering has not been considered before as a production mechanism in cometary environments. Figure 1 shows energy distributions for O2− and HO2−, scattered off from SiOx and FeOy as a function of the H2O+ incidence energy (E0). For both surfaces, O2− signal appears above E0∼50–60 eV. The peak position shifts to higher energy and the peak intensity goes through a maximum with increasing incidence energy. The scattering signal dies out above ∼200 eV (Fig. 1a,c). The same is true for HO2−, though this peak appears earlier and dies out sooner than O2− (Fig. 1b,d). These trends will be understood below considering that HO2− is a precursor to O2−. Are these anions sputtering products? Experiments with Ne+ beams scattering on SiOx and FeOy surfaces indicate that O2− is produced with intensity of ∼1–2% of that seen for H2O+ at E0=110 eV. Increasing the energy to E0=310 eV, causes the O2− signal to increase to 3% and 25% for SiOx and FeOy, respectively, compared to H2O+ at the same energy (Supplementary Fig. 3). Under 18O2 dosing, the sputtering contribution to O2− signal increases to ∼15% for H2O+/FeOy, while undetectable for H2O+/SiOx at E0=110 eV (Supplementary Fig. 4; Supplementary Table 1). Of course, sputtering is expected to increase for incidence energies above 300 eV, but the focus here is on much lower energies. With sputtering ruled out, the origin of O2− is puzzling.
Isotopic water scattering experiments on a model Pt surface
Owing to the light atomic mass of Fe and Si, H2O+ scattering on cometary surface analogues produces dynamic O2− peaks with energies over a limited range, with little separation from sputtering signal, thus hindering kinematic analysis. Collisional energy transfer is reduced on Pt, yielding larger spread in exit energies and much reduced overlap with sputtering peaks. Of course, the Pt surface needs to be oxidized first to render O-atom abstraction experiments possible. As mentioned above, CID of water ions is expected to supply O atoms to the Pt surface (proven below). However, neither H2O+ nor D2O+ ions, scattering on clean Pt, produce any discernible O2− signal. This is likely due to molecular hydrogen, present in the ultrahigh vacuum background or formed in situ by an intramolecular water-splitting reaction18, which scavenges O atoms from the Pt surface. The O-atom surface coverage must therefore be increased to overcome this problem, which is achieved readily by dosing the surface in situ with O2 gas. Molecular O2 dissociates spontaneously on Pt at room temperature19, covering the surface with adsorbed O atoms—denoted hereafter as Pt(O).
Upon exposure of the Pt surface to 16O2 gas, a strong dynamic 16O2− peak appears for both H216O+ and D216O+ beams (Supplementary Fig. 5). What is the origin of the observed 16O2−? Isotopic 18O2 dosing experiments on Pt, bombarded with normal H216O+ projectiles, can help distinguish possible contributions from sputtering or gas-phase collisions. Indeed, fast 18O16O− and 16O16O− peaks are detected, as shown in Fig. 2a,b. In contrast, there is no signal at 36 a.m.u. for all 18O2 dosing pressures tried, confirming that no molecular 18O18O− is produced (Fig. 2c). Since sputtered atomic 18O− is detected (Fig. 2d), the latter observation signifies that there is no 18O2 on the Pt surface, whether adsorbed as a whole or formed by recombination of 18O atoms. The formation of fast 18O16O− is easily explained by an ER reaction of H216O+ abstracting adsorbed 18O. The formation of fast 16O16O− may appear curious at first, as it requires the presence of 16O on the surface. But it is readily accounted for by CID of H216O+ ions18, which introduce 16O or 16OH to the Pt surface. As discussed above, H216O+ bombardment produces no 16O16O− signal unless the Pt surface is dosed with molecular oxygen. Water dissociation alone cannot provide enough 16O-atom coverage owing to reactions with background hydrogen. Extra 18O2 exposure reacts off such surface hydrogen, permitting beam-delivered 16O to compete with 18O atoms for surface sites.
Energy distributions for 18O16O− (Fig. 3a), produced from direct abstraction of 18O by H216O+ scattering on Pt(18O), are almost identical to those for 16O16O−, produced from H216O+/Pt(16O) (Fig. 3b). In both instances, the product O2− peak position varies with H216O+ incidence energy, confirming further that the observed O2− does not originate from sputtering. To avoid confusion, all subsequent references to oxygen—alone or in compounds—will be for 16O. Fast O2− is also observed from D2O+/Pt(O) with similar incidence energy dependence (Fig. 3c). The peaks are narrow and well defined, providing accurate measurement of the exit energy. In addition to O2−, H2O+/Pt(O) produces scattered H2O+, O2+, OH±, O±, H+ and H2+ (Supplementary Fig. 6). Surviving molecular H2O+ is only observed for E0≤100 eV. The O2+ signal is weak and noisy, indicating that O2 mainly exits as O2− (neutral O2 is not studied). The kinematics of OH± and O± exits can be described by binary collision theory (BCT)20, assuming that the collision produces an excited H2O, which subsequently dissociates spontaneously (Supplementary Fig. 7).
O2 − formation mechanism
We propose that molecular O2 forms by means of an ER reaction mechanism driven by energetic H2O collisions on oxidized surfaces (Fig. 4a). Following neutralization on approach, a transient state is formed at the distance-of-closest-approach (apsis) between the projectile (H2O), the surface atom (S) and the adsorbate (O). Though short-lived, this state promotes a link between projectile and adsorbate. As the projectile rebounds, the transient state disintegrates, producing an energetic molecular product, H2O–O*, in an excited state. We conjecture that this product is the elusive oxywater, a structural isomer of hydrogen peroxide and possible intermediate in oxidation reactions initiated by the latter21. The H2O–O* is unstable22 and splits rapidly into a pair of ions, H+ and HO2−, both of which are observed on FeOx and SiOy (Fig. 1). Weaker HO2− signal is also observed for H2O+/Pt(O) (Supplementary Fig. 6i). The difference in scattered signal intensity from insulating versus metallic surfaces is noteworthy and important for determining HO2− abundance in cometary comae (vide infra). The corresponding H+ fragment possesses surprisingly high kinetic energy, larger than that estimated from mass-weighted energy partitioning of the H2O–O* parent. This is remarkable and must be contrasted with the second hydrogen atom, now on HO2−, which must also be ejected to produce O2−. This dissociation is promoted by remaining internal energy in the HO2− fragment.
The proposed ER reaction mechanism is supported by an analysis of the collisional kinematics. The peak exit energies of H2O+, O2− and H+ product ions from H2O+/Pt(O) are summarized in Fig. 4b, as a function of the H2O+ incidence energy. Obviously, linear fittings capture the data well. Can the slopes be predicted? First, the kinematics of the H2O+ exit can be described very well by a slope of 0.8311, which is predicted by BCT when H2O+ scatters as a whole molecule. The intercepts of such fittings have been correlated to inelastic energy loss, termed ‘inelasticity’, associated with the production of a particular excited or ionic state11. The H2O+ inelasticity of ∼5 eV seems small for the production of a highly excited state, so we ascribe this energy loss to a surviving water ion. The kinematics of the O2− and H+ products cannot be predicted by simple scattering arguments as they are fragments of an excited state, requiring knowledge of how the excitation energy is partitioned when the parent molecule breaks apart.
The critical element of the proposed mechanism is the oxywater transient state, which is not detected in our experiments. If it exists as a parent molecule, its energetics should be reflected in the daughter fragments, H+ and HO2−. A simple summation of their measured kinetic energies may be used to estimate the energy of the H2O–O* parent, assuming late fragmentation. Given that HO2− signal from scattering on Pt(O) is extremely weak, we must look at the HO2− fragments, H and O2−, to estimate its energy. Since neutral H is not detected, the HO2− kinetic energy is estimated from the mass-weighted energy of O2− fragment. Finally, the kinetic energy of H2O–O* is obtained: E(H2O–O*)=33/32·E(O2−)+E(H+). This simple formula produces a number of points (Fig. 4b), which can be fitted relatively well by a straight line with a slope of 0.7729, corresponding to the kinematic factor predicted from BCT for H2O–O* formation by an ER reaction11.
The estimation method for the exit energy of the transient state is validated with data for D2O+/Pt(O). The peak exit energies of the D2O+, O2− and D+ product ions are summarized in Fig. 4c, as a function of the D2O+ incidence energy. Again, the kinematics of the D2O+ exit is described well by the predicted kinematic factor of 0.8140, when D2O+ scatters intact. The formula for calculating the D2O–O* exit energy now becomes: E(D2O–O*)=34/32·E(O2−)+E(D+). The calculated points, shown in Fig. 3c, can be fitted by a straight line with a predicted11 slope of 0.7576, though not as well as before.
The slopes of the data for O2−, H+ (Fig. 4b) and O2−, and D+ (Fig. 4c) cannot yet be predicted. Unconstraint, two-parameter linear fitting captures the data very well, suggesting a simple excited-energy partitioning mechanism between the oxywater molecule fragments. Comparing inelasticities, it appears that about the same energy is consumed to form O2− from H2O+ versus D2O+. The H+ and D+ fittings (currently not understood) show positive inelasticity, implying an energy gain. Most of the internal energy of the oxywater transient state is likely converted into kinetic energy for the lighter fragments23.
Similar ER reaction mechanisms yielding O2− product also occur for OH+, OD+ and O+ bombardment of Pt(O) (Supplementary Fig. 8). The O2− exit energy data versus incidence energy for all incident ions can be described very well by BCT, confirming the validity of the kinematic analysis (Supplementary Fig. 9). The OH+ and O+ species are important because the ‘accelerated water ions,’ found in the 67P coma, include ions with molecular mass between 16 and 19 a.m.u. (ref. 12). Some of these H2O+ dissociation fragments are re-introduced into the coma, where the solar wind may pick them up and recycle them back to the comet surface, thus increasing O2 production.
We have uncovered high-energy reaction channels for dynamic production of negative ions from collisions of energetic water ions with oxidized surfaces. The latter surfaces include: SiOx, FeOy, Pt(O), NiOz, Pd(O), Au(O) and TiOw (see also Supplementary Figs 10–12). Such interactions are applicable to plasmas and astrophysical environments whenever H2O+ ions are encountered with kinetic energies between 50 and 300 eV. We propose that the scattering interactions occur in cometary comae during periods of activity, where they produce energetic negative ions, including: O−, OH−, O2− and HO2−. The latter two ions, in particular, are produced by a novel ER reaction, and contribute to the O2 abundance in the coma after photodetachment24,25. The lifetime of O2− against photo-detachment is 2.6 s (at 1 a.u.)25, which suggests that O2− should be able to reach Rosetta. Negative ions should be present in the coma of 67P but they have yet to be reported, baring H− (ref. 26). Thus, our work actually predicts the existence of O2− and HO2− in the coma at distances sufficiently close to the nucleus to avoid photodetachment. Negative ions of cometary origin have been detected in the coma of comet 1P/Halley, though without sufficient mass resolution to distinguish individual ions25. Three broad peaks were observed, which were denoted as the 17-, 30- and 100-a.m.u. peaks. Chaizy et al.24 argued that the first peak included O− and OH−, while the second peak comprised CN−. Furthermore, these authors considered several negative ion production mechanisms and found them inadequate to explain the signal intensity observed in the Halley coma. We propose that energetic water ion scattering off of the nucleus surface or dust grains in the coma of 1P/Halley could populate both the 17- and 30-a.m.u. peaks, and that the latter peak must have also included O2− and HO2−.
The ER reaction mechanism is consistent with most reported6 cometary O2 observations and trends and must be an important contributor to its abundance. All necessary conditions for ER reactions on comet 67P are met: (i) water ions with the correct hyperthermal energies exist in the coma, and (ii) they impact the nucleus or dust grain surfaces, which (iii) contain oxidized materials. The mechanism explains well the strong correlation of O2 to water abundance in the coma, and also the O2 signal increase closer to the nucleus—scattering makes the surface appear as a point source of O2, thus justifying the observed 1/r2 dependence, where r=cometocentric distance. The connection to solar wind may account for the relative invariance in the O2/H2O ratio with heliocentric distance. That is, as the comet approaches the Sun, more subsurface sublimation leads to more water molecules in the coma; the solar wind also strengthens, increasing ionization and water ion flux to the surface, ultimately producing more O2. The surface reaction is independent of the nucleus surface temperature or comet illumination conditions. The ER mechanism goes beyond these trends to explain the presence of significant amounts of HO2 and the absence of O3, which have baffled Bieler et al.6 The findings are generic to comets irrespective of their origin in the early Solar System27.
The primordial origin of cometary O2 requires first a mechanism for O2 formation. Water ice radiolysis by galactic cosmic rays during primordial times has been suggested6 as that mechanism, despite evidence for very low O2 abundance in protostellar envelopes28. Radiolysis is known to produce the chemically related species O3, H2O2 and HO2 (refs 29, 30, 31). The former two molecules are stable and should have also been incorporated into the comet at the same time as O2. However, no O3 has been detected in the 67P coma, a concern identified by Bieler et al.6 that also applies to other efforts at explaining the primordial origin32,33,34. On the other hand, H2O2 and HO2 have been detected and their gaseous abundance ratios were reported for the 67P coma: H2O2/O2=0.6 × 10−3 and HO2/O2=1.9 × 10−3. These were compared with the abundance ratios measured in the ρ Oph A dense core29, where O2 has also been detected and is likely to originate from radiolysis: H2O2/O2≈HO2/O2≈0.6 × 10−3. The H2O2 abundance relative to O2 is clearly a perfect match but the value for the HO2/O2 ratio is 3 × larger in the coma of 67P. This difference suggests that HO2 is formed at higher rates than it can be destroyed, thus accumulating in the coma. It is likely that HO2 forms by a mechanism different from or perhaps in addition to that operating under interstellar conditions. Apart from the mechanism discussed in this communication, there is actually another reaction mechanism enabled by the presence of O2 in the coma, which involves a different ER reaction35. Like H2O+, photo-ionized O2+ can be picked up by solar wind and accelerated back to the comet, where it can abstract atomic H from cometary materials to form HO2.
There have been other attempts to justify the primordial O2 formation and its survival for 4.6 billion years. Mousis et al.32 considered the radiolysis of icy grains in the low-density proto-solar nebula, which may produce large amounts of O2 though ‘its incorporation as crystalline ice is highly implausible’. These authors discussed two extreme O2 production scenarios for dense and early proto-solar nebula, which require very large galactic cosmic ray fluxes and O2 trapping in clathrates. Taquet et al.33 used sophisticated astrochemical models to compare various primordial O2 formation mechanisms, proposing oxygen atom recombination at the surface of interstellar ices as a possibility, albeit under ‘warmer and denser conditions than usually expected in dark clouds’. Finally, Dulieu at al.34 proposed that O2 forms in situ during the evaporation of water ice via a dismutation reaction of co-evaporating H2O2. This mechanism requires the incorporation of primordial H2O2 in large amounts into the nucleus and its complete conversion into O2 to be consistent with the low levels of H2O2 in the coma. All these mechanisms appear to be in conflict with the relative abundances of the related species O3, H2O2 and HO2.
In contrast, the ER reaction mechanism comprises cometary ions and minerals actually found on 67P. It produces O2 in situ through the putative oxywater state, which dissociates spontaneously into HO2− as an intermediate on its way to O2− or HO2 following photodetachment. That is, HO2 is co-produced by this new reaction and should add to any amounts formed by other mechanisms. It is reasonable then to expect that the HO2/O2 ratio should be larger than interstellar values30. The remaining factor, H2O2, can form collisionally in the extended coma by hydrogen atom transfer from scattered HO2− or HO2 to ambient H2O. Finally, no O3 is produced during the ER reaction, consistent with observations.
The crux of any proposed O2 production mechanism is whether it can explain the observed O2 abundance in the 67P coma. The O2− production rate by the ER reaction is proportional to the accelerated water ion flux, which has been measured to be 3 × 109–3 × 1011 m−2 s−1 at 2 a.u. with the caveat that it may be underestimated by at least two orders of magnitude13,36. The proportionality constant (O2 yield) cannot be estimated at this time. Regardless, the reported flux is too low to make ‘accelerated’ water ions entirely responsible for the reported O2 abundance. However, it is noteworthy that there are other water-derived ions present in the coma, which can participate in similar ER reactions on the nucleus surface. For example, the extended coma also contains abundant H3O+, OH+ and O+ (ref. 36), all of which can be picked up by the solar wind and accelerated to energies sufficient to drive ER reactions (Supplementary Figs 8 and 9). Unfortunately, the flux and energy distributions of these additional ions have not been reported—H3O+, in particular, may be a serious contributor as its density in the inner coma varies considerably and can reach 100 times the density of H2O+ (ref. 37). Furthermore, the ‘cold’ water ions5 have two orders of magnitude larger flux and possess kinetic energies up to 50 eV but move away from the comet, so they can produce O2 only in collisions with dust grains. Without some knowledge of these additional species flux and energy distributions and of the dust grain density in the coma, we cannot quantify the magnitude of the ER reaction contributions to the cometary O2.
Nevertheless, we note that a unique feature of the ER reaction mechanism is its ability to produce energetic O2− anions, moving away from the nucleus towards the orbiting Rosetta spacecraft with kinetic energy between 10 and 50 eV. The Rosetta double focus mass spectrometer (ROSINA/DFMS) entrance slit plate is biased in gas mode to reject ambient ions38. Positive bias will attract and accelerate O2− into the ionizer box. Depending on cometocentric distance, some or all of the O2− anions in transit to Rosetta will undergo photodetachment24, producing neutral O2 molecules, which retain their kinetic energy and will enter the ionizer regardless of bias. Energetic collisions of hyperthermal O2− ions or neutralized O2 molecules with the gold-coated internal surfaces of the ROSINA/DFMS ionizer will produce O2+ ions by surface re-ionization39 (Supplementary Fig. 11). It is worth pondering how O2+ formed inside the ROSINA/DFMS by a mechanism other than electron impact ionization will contribute to the detected O2+ signal40.
In conclusion, energetic water ions in cometary comae, produced and accelerated by solar wind, can drive scattering interactions on cometary surfaces that alter the relative speciation in the coma. CID of water ions on the comet can generate negative ions (O− and OH−). Abstraction of chemisorbed oxygen from oxidized surfaces by water ions can also produce dynamically O2− and HO2−, by means of a previously unknown ER reaction. Kinematic analysis of the ER reaction products provides indirect evidence for the elusive oxywater state as a reaction intermediate, which may form during the hard collision, then dissociate promptly on the rebound from the surface. When this reaction occurs in comets, it can populate the coma with energetic O2− anions, which are converted readily to molecular O2 by photo-detachment. This abiotic way to produce molecular O2 informs our understanding of cometary chemistry and could be important in other astrophysical environments.
Polycrystalline Pt and Fe foils (4 N purity, ESPI) were used as received or sputter-cleaned in situ as needed. Doped Si wafers (n-type) covered with native silicon oxide (thickness 2–3 nm) were degreased but otherwise left untreated. Research grade 16O2 and 18O2 gases (5 N) were used for the dosing experiments.
Scattering apparatus operation
Laboratory experiments were carried out in an ultra-high vacuum ion scattering system connected to an ion beam line, as described in detail elsewhere41,42. Positive ions were extracted from an inductively coupled plasma of H2O or D2O in Argon carrier gas, operated at 5 mtorr and 500 W of radio-frequency power supplied at 13.56 MHz. The ions were launched into the ion beam line at −15 KV and were magnetically mass-filtered to produce isotopically pure beams of O+, OH+, OD+, H2O+ and D2O+, with fluxes between 2 and 5 μA. Ion energy was tuned by adjusting the plasma potential with respect to ground using external bias. The energy width of all incident beams was constant at ∼5 eV (full width at half maximum), determined by the electron temperature in the plasma. The ion beams were then decelerated and delivered to grounded target surfaces, held at room temperature. The beam waist on the sample was ∼3 mm. Gas dosing of the target surfaces was accomplished using a tube situated ∼2 cm from the surface. O-atom coverage was adjusted (but not measured) by changing the background O2 pressure using a leak valve. The ions impinged on the surface at 45° angle of incidence and the scattered products were detected at 45° angle of exit in the scattering plane. Though some incident ions survive the collision as charged species, most are typically neutralized efficiently on the incoming trajectory via charge exchange with the surface43. The violent collision with the metal surface causes hyperthermal surface ionization39, a process that allows some of the scattered products to exit the surface as positive or negative ions without resorting to electron-impact or photo-ionization schemes. In fact, studies of scattering at high energies would not be possible without surface ionization, as most conventional electron-impact ionizers are very inefficient at high product exit velocities. It is for this reason that no neutral products could be resolved in continuous wave experiments; their presence has been verified in calibration experiments by pulsing the beam and using lock-in detection schemes. All charged scattered products were chemically identified with a high-resolution mass spectrometer (Extrel QPS) and their translational energies were measured using a calibrated 90o-sector energy analyser. All signals reported were normalized to the corresponding beam current.
Cometary surface analogues
Thin oxides are used as analogues of cometary materials in order to avoid localized surface charging, which occurs during beam exposure at high ion flux. Surface charging interferes with the measurement of ion exit energies. When using native silicon or iron oxide (∼2–3 nm), electron tunnelling to the underlying conductive substrate allows removal of the surface charge. The presence of solar wind in the cometary environment mitigates this problem, by providing electrons to the exposed cometary materials (silicates, quartz and so on) to neutralize this charge. The choice of the oxides is obvious: (1) oxygen atoms on the silicon oxide surface are bonded to Si in a similar fashion to surface oxygen atoms in silicates, and (2) elemental Fe has been found on 67P, and given the oxidizing conditions in the coma, oxidized Fe surfaces are to be expected. Furthermore, the charging effect has been verified by scattering on titanium oxide, which is a semiconductor and has mild conductivity, but exhibits the same scattering behaviour as silicon oxide (Supplementary Fig. 12).
All relevant data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
How to cite this article: Yao, Y. & Giapis, K. P. Dynamic molecular oxygen production in cometary comae. Nat. Commun. 8, 15298 doi: 10.1038/ncomms15298 (2017).
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This report was based on work funded by the National Science Foundation/Department of Energy Partnership for Basic Plasma Science and Engineering (Award No. 1202567).
About this article
Topics in Catalysis (2018)