Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Controlling photophysical properties of ultrasmall conjugated polymer nanoparticles through polymer chain packing


Applications of conjugated polymer nanoparticles (Pdots) for imaging and sensing depend on their size, fluorescence brightness and intraparticle energy transfer. The molecular design of conjugated polymers (CPs) has been the main focus of the development of Pdots. Here we demonstrate that proper control of the physical interactions between the chains is as critical as the molecular design. The unique design of twisted CPs and fine-tuning of the reprecipitation conditions allow us to fabricate ultrasmall (3.0–4.5 nm) Pdots with excellent photostability. Extensive photophysical and structural characterization reveals the essential role played by the packing of the polymer chains in the particles in the intraparticle spatial alignment of the emitting sites, which regulate the fluorescence brightness and the intraparticle energy migration efficiency. Our findings enhance understanding of the relationship between chain interactions and the photophysical properties of CP nanomaterials, providing a framework for designing and fabricating functional Pdots for imaging applications.


New fluorescence microscopy methods often require fluorophores with specific spectroscopic properties. The development of new fluorophores is thus increasingly important. Various types of fluorophores, including organic dyes, fluorescent proteins and semiconductor quantum dots (QDs), have been used in fluorescence microscopy. Conjugated polymer nanoparticles (Pdots) have recently emerged as a new class of fluorescent nanoparticles because their fluorescent properties can be fine-tuned by an appropriate molecular design of conjugated polymers (CPs)1,2. Given their superior fluorescent brightness and photostability as well as low cytotoxicity, the applicability of Pdots as fluorescent tags3,4 and sensors5,6,7 has been expanding significantly during the last few years. Recent studies have demonstrated that, in some cases, the performance of Pdots as fluorescent tags surpasses that of conventional organic dyes and QDs8,9.

Several key factors, including the fluorescence wavelength, brightness of the fluorescence and size of the particle, greatly influence the applications of Pdots. Most bioimaging applications require fluorescence in far-red to near-infrared spectral region3. The bright fluorescence with high photostability always provide better quality of fluorescence images1. The vast majority of the previously reported Pdots were in the 10–100 nm diameter range2. However, when the Pdots are used as fluorescent tags, they should be as small as possible. Especially in clinical applications, the particle sizes should be smaller than 5.5 nm in diameter for complete elimination from the body by renal filtration2. One of the unique features of CP materials is their nanoscale intra- and inter-chain excitation energy transfer (EET)10,11. EET often causes quenching of fluorescence in CP materials at a length scale of a few nanometres up to tens of nanometres due to efficient funnelling of the excitation energy to the trap sites12,13,14. Given the sizes of the particles, fluorescence brightness of Pdots is highly related to EET. In addition, CP-based fluorescence sensing utilizes EET-mediated fluorescence quenching to enhance detection sensitivity15. Clearly, EET is one of the key factors that determines the applicability of Pdots.

Single-molecule spectroscopy studies on single CP molecules and CP aggregates have demonstrated that the conformational state of the polymer chain has a significant effect on their photophysical properties11,16,17. Although those studies implied that controlling the physical interaction between the polymer chains in the particles would be important to regulating the EET process and thus controlling the fluorescence properties of Pdots, including their brightness, little is known about the impact of intraparticle chain conformation and chain interactions on the fluorescence properties of Pdots.

Here we report the fabrication of far-red-emitting ultrasmall (diameter≈3.0–4.5 nm) Pdots with high photostability (photobleaching yield≈1.7–3.3 × 10−11) from an appropriate molecular design combined with proper control of the physical interactions between the polymer chains.


Fabrication of the Pdots

In this study, we fabricated Pdots based on a donor-acceptor-type CPs from a poly(1,8-carbazole)-benzothiadiazole copolymer (PCzBT) and a poly(1,8-carbazole)-dithienylbenzothiadiazole copolymer (PCzDTBT) (Fig. 1a,b). PCzBT and PCzDTBT in tetrahydrofuran (THF) exhibited broad absorption spectra with maxima at 482 and 494 nm, respectively (Fig. 1c,d)18. The bands are attributed to intramolecular charge-transfer (CT) absorption between donor (carbazole (Cz)) and acceptor (benzothiadiazole (BT) or dithienylbenzothiadiazole (DTBT)) moieties. Unlike most CT-type CPs that have a linear/planar shape, our CPs have a nonplanar twisted conformation due to the steric hindrance between the monomer units19. PCzBT and PCzDTBT in THF displayed fluorescence from the CT excited states with maxima at 608 and 652 nm, respectively (Fig. 1c,d). The fluorescence quantum yield (φfl) and the mean fluorescence lifetime (τfl) in THF were respectively determined to be 0.25 and 3.36 ns for PCzBT and 0.50 and 4.63 ns for PCzDTBT (Supplementary Fig. 1, Supplementary Table 1).

Figure 1: Spectroscopic properties of the fabricated Pdots.

Chemical structure of (a) PCzBT and (b) PCzDTBT. (c) Steady-state absorption (solid lines) and fluorescence (broken lines) of PCzBT in THF (black lines) and PCzBT Pdots fabricated at 277 K (PD1-L) (blue lines) and at 343 K (PD1-H) (red lines) dispersed in water. (d) Steady-state absorption (solid lines) and fluorescence (broken lines) of PCzDTBT in THF (black lines) and PCzDTBT Pdots fabricated at 277 K (PD2-L) (blue lines) and at 343 K (PD2-H) (red lines) dispersed in water. The fluorescence spectra were recorded upon 510-nm excitation.

The Pdots were fabricated using a modified reprecipitation method (see Methods for details)20. A highly diluted THF solution of the CPs was rapidly added to excess water under vigorous ultrasonication at either 277 or 343 K, which was followed by an evaporation of THF. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of Pdots obtained from PCzBT (PD1-L) and PCzDTBT (PD2-L) at 277 K (Fig. 2a,f) showed that they were nearly spherical in shape with the mean diameters of 3.0 and 4.5 nm, respectively. The TEM images also demonstrated narrow size distributions of the obtained Pdots (standard deviation of 0.56 and 1.36 nm for PD1-L and PD2-L, respectively) (Fig. 2e,h). Cryo-electron microscopy images also confirmed the 3.0-nm size of the fabricated Pdots in an aqueous environment (Fig. 2c). The ultrasmall particle sizes are likely to be due to the nonplanar shapes of PCzBT and PCzDTBT (Fig. 2i, see Discussion for details). PD1-L and PD2-L in water had highly negative zeta potentials of, respectively, −54 and −51 mV at neutral pH, indicating high dispersion stability. The colloidal solution remained stable in the dispersion for a period of at least six months.

Figure 2: Size distribution of the fabricated Pdots.

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of (a) PD1-L and (b) PD1-H. Cryo-electron microscopy (EM) images of (c) PD1-L and (d) PD1-H. (e) Frequency histogram of the size distribution of PD1-L (blue) and PD1-H (red). TEM images of (f) PD2-L and (g) PD2-H. (h) Frequency histogram of the size distribution of PD2-L (blue) and PD2-H (red). (i) Schematic illustration of the conformational state of PCzBT and PCzDTBT in the solution and in the Pdots. Scale bars=20 nm.

Pdots smaller than 10 nm in diameter have been reported by several groups. Wu et al.21 reported polyfluorene (PF) derivative-based Pdots with 3–7-nm diameters. However, the size was determined by atomic force microscopy (AFM), which usually determines particle sizes to be much smaller than those measured by TEM22. Zeigler et al.23 reported PF-BT copolymer (PFBT)-based Pdots with 7.5-nm diameter (as determined by dynamic light scattering). Only 2% of the total mass was PFBT CPs in the Pdots (that is, on average one PFBT chain per Pdot), and thus the brightness of the Pdots was similar to that of semiconductor QDs of similar size. Also, the zeta potential of the fabricated Pdots was −28 mV, indicating relatively low colloidal stability. Hashim et al.24 fabricated the smallest Pdots reported so far using polyphenylenevinylene, polyphenyleneethynylene and PFBT derivatives, with the diameters in the range of 3–5 nm. The yield of this preparation seemed to be very low2. Pu et al.25 reported a 3.6-nm conjugated oligoelectrolyte that falls into a different category of conjugated polymer nanoparticles (single-molecule nanoparticles). To the best of our knowledge, the Pdots fabricated from PCzBT (PD1-L and PD1-H, 3 nm in diameter) in this study are among the smallest conjugated polymer nanoparticles reported so far.

Spectroscopic properties of the Pdots

The absorption and fluorescence spectra of PD1-L and PD2-L in water exhibited slight red shifts in comparison with those of PCzBT and PCzDTBT in THF (Fig. 1c,d). While the fluorescence quantum yields of PD1-L and PD2-L in water (φfl=0.16 and 0.20, respectively) are smaller than those of PCzBT and PCzDTBT in THF (Supplementary Table 1), a much larger reduction in φfl is usually observed in far-red emitting Pdots1,26. Single particle fluorescence measurements demonstrated that the fluorescence brightness of the obtained Pdots was 5–9 times higher than that of CdSe/ZnS QDs, which emit photoluminescence in the same wavelength range under identical measurement conditions (Supplementary Figs 2–4, Supplementary Table 2). Given the size differences between the particles, PD1-L and PD2-L have more than an order of magnitude higher fluorescence brightness per unit volume compared with those QDs (Supplementary Table 2). This is mainly due to the extremely large molar extinction coefficient (ɛ) of the Pdots (ɛ≈2.8 × 106 and 1.2 × 107 M−1 cm−1 for PD1-L and PD2-L, respectively; see Supplementary Fig. 5, Supplementary Table 1), suggesting that CP chains are densely packed in the particles (see Supplementary Note 1). Fluorescence intensity trajectories obtained from single Pdots exhibited nearly constant intensities without any sign of blinking including triplet-state blinking (Supplementary Fig. 6). This is due to the presence of multiple emitters inside the particles that fluorescence independently (see below). The photobleaching quantum yields (φbl) of PD1-L and PD2-L were estimated to be 3.3 × 10−11 and 1.7 × 10−11, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 7). These findings demonstrate the successful fabrication of one of the smallest Pdots with the highest photostability reported so far in a reliable manner.

Each PCzBT and PCzDTBT chain may adopt different conformational states because of the relatively short chain lengths (on average 7.9 and 3.3 monomers, respectively), and thus may exhibit different fluorescence properties. Indeed, the single-chain experiments revealed the large heterogeneity in the fluorescence properties between the chains19. However, the single-particle experiments showed the narrow distributions of the fluorescence brightness (Supplementary Fig. 4, Supplementary Table 3) and lifetime (Supplementary Fig. 8, Supplementary Table 3), demonstrating the homogeneous fluorescence properties of the fabricated Pdots. This is most likely due to the large number of the CP chains in each Pdot (see Supplementary Note 1).

During optimization of the fabrication protocol, we found that while the reprecipitation temperature did not affect the size and shape of the Pdots (Fig. 2b,d,e,g,h), spectroscopic properties of the Pdots depend significantly on the temperature during ultrasonication. The PCzBT and PCzDTBT Pdots fabricated at 343 K (PD1-H and PD2-H) exhibited smaller CT absorption (Fig. 1c,d) and lower fluorescence quantum yields (φfl=0.08 and 0.09, respectively) compared with the Pdots fabricated at 277 K (φfl=0.16 and 0.20 for PD1-L and PD2-L, respectively) (Supplementary Table 1). The oscillator strength (that is, absorption intensity, f) of the CT absorption band depends on the rotational twist angle between the Cz and BT moiety (that is, smaller f with larger twist angle)19, suggesting larger twist angle between the Cz and BT moiety in PD1-H than in PD1-L. Given the structural similarity of PCzBT and PCzDTBT, the difference in the absorption spectra observed in PD2-L and PD2-H can also be interpreted by twist-angle-dependent f. A drop in φfl is often observed in CP aggregates including Pdots due to the generation of energy trap sites to which the excitation energy is funnelled through EET processes11,16. However, no reduction in φfl was observed in nanoparticles obtained from a dimeric form of CzBT (Supplementary Fig. 9) under the same reprecipitation conditions (data not shown). This excludes simple aggregation-induced fluorescence quenching as the mechanism of the reprecipitation condition-dependent φfl of the Pdots. Rather, this observation implies critical roles of the intraparticle chain conformation and chain interactions in the brightness of the fluorescence.

Photophysical interaction between the emitting sites

We next investigated the spatial orientation of the emitting sites in single Pdots using single-particle excitation polarization modulation (Fig. 3a). PD1-L and PD2-L showed greater modulation depths (mean depth=0.71 and 0.36, respectively) compared with PD1-H and PD2-H (mean depth=0.43 and 0.19, respectively) (Fig. 3b,c). A large modulation depth in multichromophoric systems corresponds to spatially well-ordered orientation of the absorption transition dipoles of the chromophores27. Our results, therefore, demonstrate that the emitting sites in PD1-L and PD2-L are more spatially ordered than those in PD1-H and PD2-H (Fig. 3d).

Figure 3: Spatial orientation of the emitting sites in the individual Pdots.

(a) Schematic illustration of single-particle excitation polarization modulation experiment. (b,c) Frequency histograms of the excitation polarization modulation depths obtained from (b) PD1-L (blue) and PD1-H (red) and (c) PD2-L (blue) and PD2-H (red). The insets show typical examples of the polarization-angle-dependent fluorescence intensity obtained for single (b) PD1-L (blue dots) and PD1-H (red dots) and (c) PD2-L (blue dots) and PD2-H (red dots) particles. The solid lines show the fitting of the data with equation (7). (d) Schematic illustrations of the spatial orders of the emitting sites in the Pdots fabricated at 277 K (top) and 343 K (bottom). Each rectangle corresponds to a single emitting site.

The spatial order of the fluorophores in multichromophoric systems often affects the efficiency of EET between them. Intra- and inter-chain EET in spatially isolated CP chains or CP nanomaterials (such as CP aggregates) are described by either the strong electronic coupling between the subunits (that is, delocalization of excited state over multiple subunits) or weak coupling (that is, localized excited-state hops between the subunits through Förster-type dipole–dipole interactions)16,28,29. The absorption and fluorescence spectra of PCzBT in organic solvents are similar to the dimeric form of CzBT, suggesting that the delocalization of the excited state occurs in up to two monomer units (that is, the dimeric form of CzBT can be treated as the spectroscopic unit of PCzBT)19. The fluorescence spectrum obtained for PD1-L in water has a peak wavelength that is similar to that of PCzBT in THF (Fig. 1c). In addition, a significant change in the fluorescence lifetime between PD1-L in water and PCzBT in THF was not observed (Supplementary Fig. 1, Supplementary Table 1). The small change in the fluorescence lifetime between PD1-L in water and PCzBT in THF can be understood from the twist-angle-dependent radiative deactivation and the chain interaction-induced non-radiative deactivation (see Discussion for details). Large modification to the fluorescence spectrum and lifetime is expected when strong coherent coupling between the subunits occurs16. Such modifications were not observed in PD1-L in water and PCzBT in THF. Our results, therefore, suggest that the contribution of the strong coupling between the spectroscopic units (that is, dimeric form of CzBT) is negligible in the Pdots fabricated in this study.

We conducted single-particle photon coincidence measurements to estimate the numbers of independently fluorescing emitting sites in each Pdot (Fig. 4a)16. The number of independent emitters is estimated from the intensity ratio of the peaks at the delay time of 0 ns (IC) to the neighbouring peaks (IL). While IC/IL=1 is expected for multichromophoric systems with large numbers of independently emitting fluorophores, smaller IC/IL values are obtained from multichromophoric systems with small numbers of independent emitters due to efficient singlet–singlet annihilation30,31. The mean IC/IL values obtained from PD1-L and PD2-L were 0.70 and 0.82, respectively (Fig. 4b,c). These values correspond to 3.3 and 5.5 independent emitters in the PD1-L and PD2-L particles, respectively (Fig. 4d). Since each PD1-L and PD2-L contains more than 100 spectroscopic units (see Supplementary Note 1), the result indicates the high efficiency of intraparticle directional EET. In contrast, any noticeable anti-bunching behaviour was not observed in PD1-H and PD2-H (Fig. 3b,c). Since the fabricated Pdots are similar in size (Fig. 2e,h) and consequently contain a similar number of the emitting sites, the mean IC/IL values obtained from PD1-H and PD2-H (I0/IL=0.90 and 0.98) indicate inefficient directional EET occurring in these particles despite their small size.

Figure 4: Numbers of independently fluorescing emitting sites in the individual Pdots.

(a) Schematic illustration of the single-particle photon coincidence experiment. (b,c) Frequency histograms of the I0/IL values obtained from (b) PD1-L (blue) and PD1-H (red) and (c) PD2-L (blue) and PD2-H (red). The insets show typical examples of the photon correlation statistics obtained for single (b) PD1-L (blue) and PD1-H (red) and (c) PD2-L (blue) and PD2-H (red) particles. (d) Schematic illustrations of the fluorescing emitting sites in the Pdots fabricated at 277 K (top) and 343 K (bottom). The filled rectangles indicate fluorescing emitting sites. The open rectangles are the emitting sites whose excited-state energy is transferred to the lower energy sites through EET.

The difference in the EET efficiency was further demonstrated by the spectral shift in fluorescence during photobleaching (Fig. 5a). Blue shifts of the fluorescence peaks of PD1-L and PD2-L were observed (mean shift of 12 and 21 nm, respectively) (Fig. 5b,c, Supplementary Fig. 10a). Large blue shifts in the fluorescence spectra of multichromophoric systems are an indication of an efficient directional EET to the lowest energy site32. Thus, the result together with photon coincidence data strongly suggest the highly efficient funnelling of the excited state to the lowest emitting sites through EET (Fig. 5d top). In contrast, a small spectral blue shift (mean shift of 1 and 5 nm) was observed in PD1-H and PD2-H (Fig. 5b,c, Supplementary Fig. 10b), confirming inefficient directional EET occurring in these particles (Fig. 5d bottom). The single-particle fluorescence spectroscopy experiments unambiguously demonstrated that the intraparticle EET is regulated by the spatial order of the emitting sites within the particle, even at a length scale as small as three nanometers.

Figure 5: Directional EET occurring inside the individual Pdots.

(a) Schematic illustration of the single-particle fluorescence spectra measurement. (b,c) Frequency histograms of the total spectral shifts during the photobleaching obtained for (b) PD1-L (blue) and PD1-H (red) and (c) PD2-L (blue) and PD2-H (red). The insets show typical time courses of the peak emission wavelengths obtained for single (b) PD1-L (blue) and PD1-H (red) and (c) PD2-L (blue) and PD2-H (red) particles. (d) Schematic illustrations of the EET occurring inside the Pdots fabricated at 277 K (top) and 343 K (bottom). The arrows indicate the direction of the EET between the emitting sites.

Packing of the polymer chains in the Pdots

Next, we investigated how the spatial order of the emitting sites in the particle is established using electron microscopy. Selected area electron diffraction patterns obtained from the fabricated Pdots are shown in Fig. 6a–d. Sharp spots or thin ring structures, which indicate the presence of crystalline structures, are not observed in all Pdots, suggesting amorphous structure of the CP chains in the particles. However, the selected area electron diffraction patterns of PD1-L and PD2-L displayed more recognizable diffuse ring patterns (Fig. 6a,c) than those of PD1-H and PD2-H (Fig. 6b,d), suggesting that the chains in PD1-L and PD2-L are packed in a more structurally ordered manner than they are in PD1-H and PD2-H (inset to Fig. 6e). Since the emitting sites are a part of the main chain of the CPs, the spatially ordered arrangement of the emitting sites in PD1-L and PD2-L is a direct result of the ordered packing of the PCzBT and PCzDTBT chains in the particles.

Figure 6: Intraparticle chain packing of the Pdots.

(ad) Selected area electron diffraction patterns obtained from (a) PD1-L, (b) PD1-H, (c) PD2-L and (d) PD2-H. Scale bars=10 nm−1 (e) 1H NMR spectra of the PD1-L (blue line) and PD1-H (red line). The insets show schematic illustrations of the packing of the polymer chains in the Pdots fabricated at 277 K (top) and 343 K (bottom). The yellow lines signify polymer chains in the particles.

We then used nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy to investigate the packing of the aliphatic side chains in the Pdots. NMR spectra of polymers usually exhibit broad peaks because the conformational flexibility of the chains provides varied local environments surrounding specific atoms in the chain and thus varied shielding effects in each chain. Thus, the widths and shifts of the peaks provide an indication of the packing and order in the polymer chains33. The main peaks of 1H NMR spectra obtained from PD1-L and PD1-H (Fig. 6e) are located around 0.80 and 1.2 p.p.m., which are attributed to aliphatic side chains of PCzBT. A slight broadening of the peak was observed at 1.2 p.p.m. in PD1-H when compared with PD1-L. We also observed a slight spectral shift at 0.80 p.p.m. between PD1-L and PD1-H. These results can be interpreted by the different packing of the aliphatic side chains in PD1-L and in PD1-H. Given the spatially ordered packing of the main chains in PD1-L compared with those in PD1-H (Fig. 6a,b), the different packing of the aliphatic side chains could be governed by the different packing of the main chains in PD1-L and PD1-H, and vice versa.


Our findings provide an important clue to the development of ultrasmall Pdots. While the packing of the PCzBT chains is significantly different in PD1-L and PD1-H (Fig. 6), these two Pdots have similar sizes (Fig. 2e). This indicates that the size of the particle is determined by the PCzBT molecule itself rather than by the interaction of the PCzBT chains inside the particles. Most CPs have a linear shape, and they therefore have to adopt strained conformations if these chains are squeezed into ultrasmall Pdots23. In contrast, PCzBT and PCzDTBT have twisted shapes, which can be easily squeezed into ultrasmall Pdots without introducing energetically unfavourable strained conformations. This allows for the reliable and efficient fabrication of the 3-nm diameter Pdots with very high colloidal stability. Reduced surface energy of the CP chains in a bent conformation inside the Pdots might also contribute to the high stability of the particles34.

Our findings also provide an important clue to the development of brighter Pdots. The brightness of the fluorescence is highly related to the fluorescence quantum yield (φfl). φfl is determined by the ratio of the radiative rate constant (kr) and the non-radiative rate constant (knr) (Supplementary Fig. 11a). Thus, larger kr and smaller knr are required for achieving a high φfl value. Most far-red-emitting Pdots suffer from a significant reduction in φfl compared with the CPs from which they were fabricated. This is mainly due to the significant increase in knr due to the generation of energy trap sites in the particles through aggregations of CP chains. Indeed, it has been widely believed that higher spatial order and better packing of CPs inside Pdots lead to interchain interactions through π–π stacking, which causes fluorescence quenching. The standard method to resolve this problem is to fabricate Pdots by mixing CPs and non-CPs3,26 and/or inserting bulky side groups35 to CPs, which allow for physical separation of the CPs in the Pdots36. While this strategy works well for planar-shaped CPs, large φfl is obtained at the cost of a lower density of fluorescing moieties26. Our comprehensive characterization of the Pdots fabricated using structurally similar but different CPs demonstrates that quenching can largely be suppressed without physical isolation of the CP chains by fabricating Pdots with non-planar CT-type CPs. PD1-L and PD2-L, which were fabricated without any non-CPs and/or bulky side chains, showed marginal increases of knr compared with the corresponding CPs (PCzBT and PCzDTBT; Supplementary Fig. 11b,c). The generation of energy trap sites is thus inefficient in PD1-L and PD2-L. Obviously, this is one of the reasons that relatively high φfl are maintained in PD1-L and PD2-L.

While spatially ordered packing of the chains (that is, PD1-L and PD2-L) resulted in efficient intraparticle EET, it did not cause reduction in φfl, suggesting that fluorescence quenching is governed by local chain interactions rather than by the overall spatial order of the emitting sites within the particles. The main difference between most previous Pdots and PD1-L/PD2-L is the shape of the CPs. While most far-red-emitting CPs have linear and planar shapes, PCzBT and PCzDTBT have twisted nonplanar shapes. Since π–π stacking of the CP chains is responsible for the aggregations of the chains and therefore the generation of quenching sites (that is, energy trap sites), our findings suggest that the unique twisted shape of the CPs used in this study prevents the CP chains from π–π stacking and from forming quenching sites, which results in brighter fluorescence.

The drop in φfl in PD1-H and PD2-H compared with PD1-L and PD2-L is partly explained by the increase in knr values (Supplementary Fig. 11b,c) and therefore by the generation of additional quenching sites (that is, energy trap sites) in PD1-H and PD2-H. Structural characterization (Fig. 6) revealed temperature-dependent polymer chain packing during fabrication, which demonstrated the critical role played by chain packing in the generation of quenching sites in the particles. These results clearly indicate that the brightness of Pdots is partly governed by the packing of CP chains in the particles, which can be optimized by reprecipitation conditions.

Steady-state absorption spectra of PCzBT (Fig. 1c) exhibited the largest CT absorption in the solution phase, followed by PD1-L. PD1-H exhibited smallest CT absorption. Similar trend was observed with PCzDTBT. Since fluorescence brightness is proportional to the absorption cross-section, the results indicate that PD1-L and PD2-L exhibit brighter fluorescence compared with PD1-H and PD2-H. The cross-section (which is proportional to the oscillator strength, f) of the CT absorption between Cz and BT depends on the rotational twist angle between the two moieties (that is, larger f for smaller twist angle)19. Thus, the Cz and BT moieties adopt most planar conformation in THF and a more twisted conformation in PD1-H. Given the different packing of the PCzBT chains in PD1-L and PD1-H, the rotational twist angle between Cz and BT is regulated by the packing of the chains in the Pdots that is controlled by the reprecipitation conditions. According to the Strickler–Berg equation37, f is proportional to kr; the rotational twist thus affects φfl as well (that is, larger kr results in larger φfl) (Supplementary Fig. 11a). As predicted by the Strickler–Berg equation, the CT absorption cross-sections of PCzBT and PCzDTBT are proportional to kr (Supplementary Fig. 11b,c) except for a small deviation in PD1-H. The brighter fluorescence observed in PD1-L and PD2-L is, therefore, partly attributed to the smaller rotational twist between the Cz and BT or DTBT moieties compared with PD1-H and PD2-H. The fabrication temperature-dependent rotational twist angle is most likely due to the different CP chains packing in the Pdots.

All these observations point to a new strategy for obtaining brighter Pdots: design non-planar CPs that prevent the formation of local quenching sites and control the packing of the CP chains in Pdots by optimizing the reprecipitation conditions. EET between different CPs (that is, energy donor CP and energy acceptor CP) in single Pdots has been used to design and fabricate far-red/near-infrared emitting Pdots3,26,38. Although very bright Pdots can be obtained by this approach, residual fluorescence from the energy-donor CP cannot be avoided completely. Also, heterogeneity between individual particles has to be evaluated carefully in such Pdots. This will be a particularly important issue in the fabrication of ultrasmall Pdots. Since the particles consist of a relatively small number of CP chains, the efficiency of intra-particle EET could vary between individual particles. Advanced fluorescence imaging such as fluorescence lifetime imaging and single-particle tracking with such Pdots might not be straightforward. Our new strategy to design and fabricate bright far-red/near-infrared-emitting Pdots would serve as a fundamental framework for the future development of Pdots.

We also demonstrated that EET occurring in Pdots can be regulated by controlling the physical interactions between the chains by modifying the reprecipitation conditions. Intraparticle EET is especially important in the sensing applications of Pdots5,6,7,15. While simultaneous realization of bright fluorescence with high EET efficiency is required in sensing applications, efficient EET often results in quenched fluorescence due to intrachain interactions. Our findings suggest that very bright Pdots with efficient intraparticle EET can be fabricated by selecting proper CT-type CPs and appropriate reprecipitation conditions.

While the number of independent emitters in the particles depends on the reprecipitation conditions, multiple simultaneously emitting sites exist in all the fabricated Pdots that create spatially isotropic fluorescence emitted by the particles (Supplementary Fig. 12). Spatially isotropic fluorescence is essential for accurate localization of the particles39, which is not always straightforward with fluorophores that emit anisotropic luminescence such as organic dyes and QDs. The result together with the small size and high photostability of the obtained Pdots suggests that they could be ideal fluorophores for single-particle tracking studies40.

Given an increasing number of applications of Pdots based on CT-type CPs because of their wide tunability of fluorescence wavelength, our findings provide a fundamental framework for designing and fabricating new functionalized Pdots. Finally, the reliable method to fabricate Pdots with 3-nm size reported here should open the possibility of using Pdots in a wide spectrum of in vivo applications in clinical settings.


Preparation of the Pdots

Procedures for the synthesis of poly(1,8-carbazole)-benzothiadiazole copolymer (PCzBT, Mn=5,400, Mw/Mn=1.6) and poly(1,8-carbazole)-dithienylbenzothiadiazole copolymer (PCzDTBT, Mn=2,800, Mw/Mn=1.1) are described elsewhere18. The molecular weights of the polymers were determined by gel permeation chromatography using polystyrene standards. Similar molecular weights were obtained from matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization—time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry. Semiconductor QDs, Qdot 605 ITK amino (PEG) and Qtracker 655 vascular labels were purchased from Molecular Probes. THF was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Conjugated polymer nanoparticles (Pdots) were fabricated by a modified reprecipitation method. A stock solution was prepared by dissolving 1 mg of PCzBT in 3 ml of fresh THF. The stock solution was diluted into THF at a concentration of 1.65 p.p.m. (3.1 × 10−7 M), briefly sonicated in an ultrasonic bath (37 kHz, Elma Schmidbauer GmbH, Elmasonic P60H), and filtered through a 0.2-μm membrane filter (Advantec MFS., 13HP020AN). One millilitre of the solution was then added to 6 ml of MilliQ water (Millipore, Milli-Q Reference) using a syringe equipped with a 0.1-μm membrane filter (Chemglass Life Sciences, CLS-2005-003) and a 23G × 1″ needle. The solution was rapidly injected into the water in a glass vial, and the mixed solution was kept under sonication in an ultrasonic bath at either 277 or 343 K for 60 min. THF in the mixed solution was removed by evaporation under vacuum 30 min after the injection of the solution, which was followed by a continuous flow of compressed dry air for 2 h to evaporate the water and concentrate the colloidal suspension. The final volume of the colloidal solution was 200–250 μl. The resulting Pdot suspension was further filtered through a 0.1-μm membrane filter (Chemglass Life Sciences, CLS-2005-003). The Pdots fabricated in 4–6 different batches were mixed before we conducted all the experiments, including ensemble spectroscopic measurements, single-particle fluorescence microscopy experiments, electron microscopy experiments and NMR spectroscopy experiments.

Structural characterization of the Pdots

The zeta potential of the Pdots was measured on a dynamic light scattering Malvern Zetasizer NanoZS. TEM images of the Pdots were produced by an FEI Tecnai G2 Spirit TWIN microscope. The samples for the TEM measurements were prepared by dropcasting colloidal solutions of the Pdots onto a holey carbon film on Cu grids (EMS, Q225-CMA) and drying them in air for 1 h immediately before the measurement. The TEM grids were treated with plasma before sample preparation. Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) images were made on an FEI Titan Krios. The samples for the cryo-EM measurements were prepared by placing 2 μl of the Pdot solution on a holey carbon coated Cu grid, quickly blotting the excess solution with filter paper to produce a thin fluid layer (100 nm thickness), and freezing the grids in liquid ethane cryogen. The samples were then placed in the autoloader of the Titan Krios for imaging. The 1D 1H gradient NMR with water suppression using excitation sculpting were conducted on a Bruker Avance III 950 MHz NMR spectrometer equipped with a TCI cryo-probe. The Pdot colloidal solutions were concentrated by evaporating water using a flow of dry air through a 0.1-μm syringe membrane filter. A 4 ml of deuterated oxide was added to a 1 ml of the Pdots solutions. The solutions were concentration to the final volume of 1 ml by evaporation under vacuum. The 1D 1H diffusion NMR experiments using stimulated echo and bipolar gradient pulses and 3–9–19 water suppression sequence measurements to remove sharp signal impurities were performed on a Bruker Avance III 600 MHz NMR spectrometer equipped with a z-gradient broadband BBO probe.

Ensemble spectroscopy measurements

Steady-state absorption and fluorescence measurements were performed in a U-3900 Spectrometer (Hitachi High-Technologies) to collect absorption spectra and in a Fluoromax-4 spectrofluorometer (Horiba Scientific) to collect fluorescence spectra. After subtracting the scattering response from the solvent, fluorescence spectra were corrected using the spectral response of the photodetector. The concentration of the samples was set to 10−6 M for all fluorescence measurements to minimize inner-filter effects. The fluorescence quantum yield (φfl) was determined using Rhodamine 101 (Acros Organics) and 4-(dicyanomethylene)-2-methyl-6-(4-dimethylaminostyryl)-4H-pyran (DCM, Sigma Aldrich) as references. Fluorescence decays were measured using a home-built time-correlated single-photon counting (TCSPC) setup. Samples were excited at 530 nm using an LDH-P-FA-530L picosecond pulsed diode laser (PicoQuant, pulse width≈100 ps, repetition=20 MHz). Fluorescence from the samples was focused on a monochromator (Sciencetech, 9030DS) to obtain spectral separation and detected with a microchannel plate photomultiplier tube (MCP-PMT, Hamamatsu Photonics K.K., R3809U-63) in the photon counting mode. The signal from MCP-PMT was amplified by a high speed amplifier (Hamamatsu Photonics K.K., C5594-12). The TCSPC measurements were conducted using a TCSPC module (PicoQuant, HydraHarp 400). The setup was controlled by SymPhoTime64 software (PicoQuant). The fluorescence decay curves were fitted to multi-exponential decaying functions with deconvolution of the instrument response function using FluoFit software (PicoQuant). Mean fluorescence lifetimes (τfl) were calculated by the equation

where Ai and τi respectively denote the amplitude and lifetime of the component i.

Single-particle confocal microscopy measurements

Single-particle fluorescence measurements were conducted either on a home-built scanning confocal microscope or a wide-field epi illumination microscope, both based on an Olympus IX 71 platform. A picosecond pulsed laser diode operating at 530 nm (PicoQuant, LDH-P-FA-530L) was used as the excitation source in the scanning confocal microscope setup. The circularly polarized excitation light was obtained using a Berek compensator (Newport, Model 5540), and the laser intensity was tuned by neutral density filters (Thorlabs, FW2AND). The excitation light was expanded by a beam expander to fill the back aperture of the objective lens before introducing the light into the microscope. The samples for all the single-particle measurements were prepared by depositing colloidal solutions of the Pdots on clean coverslips. The samples were excited through a high numerical aperture (NA) oil immersion objective (UPlanSApo, × 100, NA 1.40, Olympus). The excitation power at the sample plane was set to 1.5 and 15 kW cm−2 for the measurements of fluorescence intensity trajectories and fluorescence spectra, respectively. Raster scanning of the samples was achieved by moving the objective with a precision piezoelectric translation stage (Physik Instrumente, P-733.2CL,) controlled by a digital piezo controller (Physik Instrumente, E-710.4CL). Fluorescence from the samples was collected by the same objective, passed through a dichroic mirror (Semrock, Di02-R532) and separated from the remaining excitation light by a long-pass emission filter (Semrock, BLP01-532R) after focusing on a 100-μm pinhole (Thorlabs, P100S) by the tube lens of the microscope. Fluorescence spectra were measured by an electron-multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD) camera (Andor Technology, Newton 970P-BV) equipped with a spectrograph (Andor Technology, SR-303i-B). For the measurements of single-particle fluorescence images, fluorescence intensity time trajectories and fluorescence decay curves, the fluorescence signal was detected by a single photon avalanche photodiode (SPAD, PicoQuant, τ-SPAD-50,) and recorded by the TCSPC module (PicoQuant, HydraHarp 400) in the time-tagged time-resolved mode. The brightness of the fluorescence of single particles was estimated by measuring fluorescence images of the individual particles under identical excitation and detection conditions and calculating the integrated intensity of each fluorescence spot.

Photon coincidence measurements

A 530-nm circularly polarized pulsed laser light (PicoQuant, LDH-P-FA-530L; 120 W cm−2 at the sample plane) was used as the excitation source. Hanbury–Brown and Twiss-type photon correlation configurations were applied. The fluorescence photons of all wavelengths were divided by a 50/50 non-polarizing cube beam splitter (Thorlabs, CM1-BS013) and detected by two SPADs (PicoQuant, τ-SPAD-50,) after they pass through a set of bandpass filters (Semrock, FF01-665/150). The signals from the two SPADs were recorded by the TCSPC HydraHarp 400 module in the time-tagged time-resolved mode. SymPhoTime64 software (PicoQuant) was used for both the acquisition of all fluorescence microscopy data and analysis of the data.

Determination of molar extinction coefficient of Pdots

Molar extinction coefficients (ɛ) of the Pdots were calculated based on the peak absorbance of the ensemble absorption spectra (A) and their molar concentrations estimated by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) measurements. FCS can provide concentration values when the size and shape of the confocal volume is known. A 530-nm circularly polarized pulsed laser light (PicoQuant, LDH-P-FA-530L; 1.5 kW cm−2 at the sample plane) was used for the FCS measurements. The confocal volume (Veff) described by the short (r0) and long (z0) axes of an ellipsoid (Veff3/2·r02·z0) was determined by fitting the autocorrelation curve obtained from a calibrating sample, TetraSpec microspheres (0.1 μm, Molecular Probes), with a known concentration (C) and diffusion constant (D=0.044 × 10−6 cm2 s−1 in water) to the following equation:

where τ, τD, and N denote the lag time, diffusion time and average particle number in the confocal volume, respectively. Xt(τ) is the contribution of triplet blinking to the autocorrelation curve and is described by

where T and τtriplet are respectively the fraction of the triplet state and the triplet lifetime. The concentration of the Pdots was determined from the amplitude of the autocorrelation curve (1/(Veff·C)) at τ=0 by fitting the data with equation (1). C was determined for Pdot solutions with three different dilutions, and the ɛ value was calculated from A using the Beer–Lambert law.

Determination of photobleaching yields

Photobleaching yields (φbl) of the Pdots were estimated by comparison with a reference sample41. An ensemble sample of Rhodamine 6G (R6G) dispersed in a thin film of poly(methyl methacrylate) (φblR6G=5 × 10−7)42 was used as the reference. Fluorescence intensity trajectories of individual Pdots deposited on a cover slip and the R6G sample were measured under the same conditions using a 532-nm circulary polarized continuous wave laser light (Cobolt, Samba; 15 kW cm−2 at the sample plane). The intensity trajectories were fitted to double exponential decaying functions. Rate constants of the photobleaching (kbl) were determined from the fast decaying component as their contribution was dominant. φbl was estimated by the following equation:

where kfl is the rate constant of the excited-state deactivation determined by the fluorescence lifetime measurements.

Single-particle wide-field microscopy measurements

A continuous wave diode laser module operating at 488 nm (Cobolt, MLD 488) was used as the excitation source. The laser intensity was tuned with a variable neutral density filter (Thorlabs, RSP1D). A circularly polarized excitation light was obtained using a Berek compensator (Newport, Model 5540). Samples were excited through an oil immersion objective (Olympus, TIRF UApo N, × 100, NA 1.49) by focusing the excitation light at the back aperture of the objective lens. Resulting fluorescence was separated from the excitation laser by a dichroic beam splitter (Semrock, FF506-Di03) followed by an emission filter (Semrock, FF01-609/181) and collected by a high-speed EMCCD camera (iXon Ultra 897, Andor Technology).

Excitation polarization modulation measurements

For the excitation polarization modulation measurements, a linearly polarized excitation beam was obtained by inserting a Glan-laser polarizer (Thorlabs, GL5-A) into the circularly polarized excitation beam (Cobolt, MLD 488). The linearly polarized excitation beam was rotated around the optical axis by using a half-wave plate (Thorlabs, WPMQ05M-488) mounted on a precision rotation mount (Thorlabs, RS1D) while consecutive fluorescence images of the samples were recorded. The excitation power at the sample plane was set to 120 W cm−2. The fluorescence intensities of individual particles were calculated by integrating the intensities of each pixel in the fluorescence spots. The fluorescence intensity at polarization angle θ (Iθ) was fit to the following equation:

where M, I0 and θ0 denote the excitation polarization modulation depth, average fluorescence intensity and polarization angle at maximum fluorescence intensity, respectively. Alternatively, M was calculated by the following equation:

where Imax and Imin are the maximum and minimum fluorescence intensities, respectively.

Defocused fluorescence imaging

Defocused fluorescence imaging was performed by using the circularly polarized excitation laser beam (Cobolt, MLD 488). The excitation power at the sample plane was set to 500 W cm−2. The fluorescence images were recorded by shifting the microscope stage by approximately 1 μm towards the objective from the focal position. The fluorescence images were magnified 2.14 times by inserting a relay lens (Edmund Optics, 43-995) before the EMCCD camera. The defocused images were recorded at a 0.5-Hz frame rate.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Piwoński, H. et al. Controlling photophysical properties of ultrasmall conjugated polymer nanoparticles through polymer chain packing. Nat. Commun. 8, 15256 doi: 10.1038/ncomms15256 (2017).

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1

    Wu, C., Bull, B., Szymanski, C., Christensen, K. & McNeill, J. Multicolor conjugated polymer dots for biological fluorescence imaging. ACS Nano 2, 2415–2423 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Wu, C. F. & Chiu, D. T. Highly fluorescent semiconducting polymer dots for biology and medicine. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 3086–3109 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Wu, C. F. et al. Design of highly emissive polymer dot bioconjugates for in vivo tumor targeting. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50, 3430–3434 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Ahmed, E., Morton, S. W., Hammond, P. T. & Swager, T. M. Fluorescent multiblock pi-conjugated polymer nanoparticles for in vivo tumor targeting. Adv. Mater. 25, 4504–4510 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Wu, C. F., Bull, B., Christensen, K. & McNeill, J. Ratiometric single-nanoparticle oxygen sensors for biological imaging. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 2741–2745 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Pu, K. Y., Shuhendler, A. J. & Rao, J. H. Semiconducting polymer nanoprobe for in vivo imaging of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 10325–10329 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Zhao, Q. et al. Fluorescent/phosphorescent dual-emissive conjugated polymer dots for hypoxia bioimaging. Chem. Sci. 6, 1825–1831 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Liu, H. Y. et al. Quinoxaline-based polymer dots with ultrabright red to near-infrared fluorescence for in vivo biological imaging. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 10420–10429 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Wu, I. C. et al. Squaraine-based polymer dots with narrow, bright near-infrared fluorescence for biological applications. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 173–178 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Schwartz, B. J. Conjugated polymers as molecular materials: how chain conformation and film morphology influence energy transfer and interchain interactions. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 54, 141–172 (2003).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Vogelsang, J., Adachi, T., Brazard, J., Bout, D. A. V. & Barbara, P. F. Self-assembly of highly ordered conjugated polymer aggregates with long-range energy transfer. Nat. Mater. 10, 942–946 (2011).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Habuchi, S., Onda, S. & Vacha, M. Mapping the emitting sites within a single conjugated polymer molecule. Chem. Commun. 4868–4870 (2009).

  13. 13

    Habuchi, S., Onda, S. & Vacha, M. Molecular weight dependence of emission intensity and emitting sites distribution within single conjugated polymer molecules. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13, 1743–1753 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Bolinger, J. C., Traub, M. C., Adachi, T. & Barbara, P. F. Ultralong-range polaron-induced quenching of excitons in isolated conjugated polymers. Science 331, 565–567 (2011).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Zhu, C. L., Liu, L. B., Yang, Q., Lv, F. T. & Wang, S. Water-soluble conjugated polymers for imaging, diagnosis, and therapy. Chem. Rev. 112, 4687–4735 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Stangl, T. et al. Mesoscopic quantum emitters from deterministic aggregates of conjugated polymers. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E5560–E5566 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Vacha, M. & Habuchi, S. Conformation and physics of polymer chains: a single-molecule perspective. NPG Asia Mater. 2, 134–142 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Michinobu, T. et al. Multicolor emission and thin film transistor properties of 1,8-diethynylcarbazole-based conjugated copolymers. Polymer 52, 5756–5763 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Habuchi, S., Fujita, H., Michinobu, T. & Vacha, M. Twist angle plays an important role in photophysical properties of a donor-acceptor-type conjugated polymer: a combined ensemble and single-molecule study. J. Phys. Chem. B 115, 14404–14415 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Pecher, J. & Mecking, S. Nanoparticles of conjugated polymers. Chem. Rev. 110, 6260–6279 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Wu, C. F., Szymanski, C. & McNeill, J. Preparation and encapsulation of highly fluorescent conjugated polymer nanoparticles. Langmuir 22, 2956–2960 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Wu, C. F. et al. Bioconjugation of ultrabright semiconducting polymer dots for specific cellular targeting. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 15410–15417 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Zeigler, M. B., Sun, W., Rong, Y. & Chiu, D. T. Hybrid semiconducting polymer nanoparticles as polarization-sensitive fluorescent probes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 11453–11456 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Hashim, Z., Howes, P. & Green, M. Luminescent quantum-dot-sized conjugated polymer nanoparticles-nanoparticle formation in a miniemulsion system. J. Mater. Chem. 21, 1797–1803 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Pu, K. Y., Li, K. & Liu, B. Cationic oligofluorene-substituted polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane as light-harvesting unimolecular nanoparticle for fluorescence amplification in cellular imaging. Adv. Mater. 22, 643–646 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Liu, P. et al. Red-emitting DPSB-based conjugated polymer nanoparticles with high two-photon brightness for cell membrane imaging. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7, 6754–6763 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Hu, D. H. et al. Collapse of stiff conjugated polymers with chemical defects into ordered, cylindrical conformations. Nature 405, 1030–1033 (2000).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Collini, E. & Scholes, G. D. Coherent intrachain energy migration in a conjugated polymer at room temperature. Science 323, 369–373 (2009).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Collini, E. & Scholes, G. D. Electronic and vibrational coherences in resonance energy transfer along MEH-PPV chains at room temperature. J. Phys. Chem. A 113, 4223–4241 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Hofkens, J. et al. Revealing competitive Forster-type resonance energy-transfer pathways in single bichromophoric molecules. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 13146–13151 (2003).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Hollars, C. W., Lane, S. M. & Huser, T. Controlled non-classical photon emission from single conjugated polymer molecules. Chem. Phys. Lett. 370, 393–398 (2003).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Huser, T., Yan, M. & Rothberg, L. J. Single chain spectroscopy of conformational dependence of conjugated polymer photophysics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 11187–11191 (2000).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Ko, Y. J., Mendez, E. & Moon, J. H. Controlled aggregation in conjugated polymer nanoparticles via organic acid treatments. Macromolecules 44, 5527–5530 (2011).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Hintze, C., Schutze, F., Drescher, M. & Mecking, S. Probing of chain conformations in conjugated polymer nanoparticles by electron spin resonance spectroscopy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17, 32289–32296 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Liu, J., Feng, G. X., Ding, D. & Liu, B. Bright far-red/near-infrared fluorescent conjugated polymer nanoparticles for targeted imaging of HER2-positive cancer cells. Polym. Chem. 4, 4326–4334 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Li, K. & Liu, B. Polymer-encapsulated organic nanoparticles for fluorescence and photoacoustic imaging. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 6570–6597 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Turro, N. J. Modern Molecular Photochemistry Chapter 5 University Science Books, Sausalito, California (1991).

  38. 38

    Koner, A. L., Krndija, D., Hou, Q., Sherratt, D. J. & Howarth, M. Hydroxy-terminated conjugated polymer nanoparticles have near-unity bright fraction and reveal cholesterol-dependence of IGF1R nanodomains. ACS Nano 7, 1137–1144 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Enderlein, J., Toprak, E. & Selvin, P. R. Polarization effect on position accuracy of fluorophore localization. Opt. Express 14, 8111–8120 (2006).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    Shechtman, Y., Weiss, L. E., Backer, A. S., Lee, M. Y. & Moerner, W. E. Multicolour localization microscopy by point-spread-function engineering. Nat. Photonics 10, 590–594 (2016).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41

    Eggeling, C., Widengren, J., Rigler, R. & Seidel, C. A. M. Photobleaching of fluorescent dyes under conditions used for single-molecule detection: evidence of two-step photolysis. Anal. Chem. 70, 2651–2659 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42

    Fouassier, J.-P. & Rabek, J. F. Lasers in polymer science and technology: applications vol. III, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida (1990).

Download references


The research reported in this publication was supported by King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST). We thank Dr Rachid Sougrat for the cryo-EM images and Dr Christian Canlas and Dr Abdelhamid Emwas for the NMR spectra of the fabricated Pdots. We also thank Haruka Osako for the assistance in the polymer synthesis.

Author information




S.H. conceived the project. H.P. and S.H. designed the experiments. H.P. conducted the experiments and analysed the data. T.M. synthesized the polymers. H.P. and S.H. wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the results.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Satoshi Habuchi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures, Supplementary Tables, Supplementary Note and Supplementary References. (PDF 2177 kb)

Peer Review File (PDF 1244 kb)

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Piwoński, H., Michinobu, T. & Habuchi, S. Controlling photophysical properties of ultrasmall conjugated polymer nanoparticles through polymer chain packing. Nat Commun 8, 15256 (2017).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing