Abstract
The ultrafast spatial and temporal dynamics of excited carriers are important to understanding the response of materials to laser pulses. Here we use scanning ultrafast electron microscopy to image the dynamics of electrons and holes in silicon after excitation with a short laser pulse. We find that the carriers exhibit a diffusive dynamics at times shorter than 200 ps, with a transient diffusivity up to 1,000 times higher than the room temperature value, D_{0}≈30 cm^{2}s^{−1}. The diffusivity then decreases rapidly, reaching a value of D_{0} roughly 500 ps after the excitation pulse. We attribute the transient superdiffusive behaviour to the rapid expansion of the excited carrier gas, which equilibrates with the environment in 100−150 ps. Numerical solution of the diffusion equation, as well as ab initio calculations, support our interpretation. Our findings provide new insight into the ultrafast spatial dynamics of excited carriers in materials.
Introduction
Ultrafast lasers have enabled detailed studies of the dynamics of charge carriers in materials in the fs−ns time domain^{1,2}. Yet, the ultrafast spatial dynamics of excited carriers is still challenging to characterize. For example, pumpprobe microscopy with visible light is inherently limited by diffraction, and it remains a nonroutine approach in spite of recent progress^{3}. Studies of the spatiotemporal evolution of excited carriers have recently become possible using scanning ultrafast electron microscopy (SUEM)^{4,5,6,7}, a technique that combines the spatial resolution of electron microscopy and the time resolution of ultrafast lasers.
Knowledge of the spatial distribution of excited carriers provides a more complete understanding of ultrafast carrier dynamics in materials. For example, exciting a silicon pn junction with a laser^{5} induces a socalled superdiffusive transport regime in which the distance covered by excited carriers over a time τ is significantly longer than the diffusion length L_{D}=, where D_{0} is the room temperature carrier diffusivity. Similarly, ultrafast laserinduced demagnetization of ferromagnetic films has been explained using superdiffusion of charge carriers and spin, but this process is still the subject of considerable research to unravel its mechanism^{8,9}.
Theoretical modelling of excited carrier dynamics is still in its infancy. Firstprinciples calculations have recently been employed to study carrier dynamics in the fs−ps time domain for spatially uniform carrier distributions in semiconductors and metals^{10,11,12,13,14}. Yet, modelling from first principles the spatial dynamics of carriers on the μm length scale still constitutes a formidable challenge. On the μm length scale, the dynamics of excited carriers typically occurs in the hydrodynamic regime^{15}, and it can often be modelled satisfactorily through semiclassical transport theory^{16,17}, as is done in this work.
Here, we measure the spatiotemporal evolution of the electron and hole populations after laser excitation in silicon using the SUEM technique^{4,5}. Analysis of the second moment of the carrier spatial distribution reveals two distinct regimes for the carrier dynamics. A transient superdiffusive dynamics is found for times shorter than ∼200 ps, where the carriers exhibit a transient diffusivity D ∝ ∂/∂t larger by a factor of ∼1,000 than the room temperature diffusivity^{18} and monotonically increasing with the laser fluence. For times longer than ∼500 ps, the carriers exhibit a typical steadystate diffusive transport regime, with diffusivity D_{0}≈30 cm^{2} s^{−1} (ref. 18). Treating the excited carriers as a hot nondegenerate electron gas, we attribute the rapid transient expansion to the large pressure gradient in the carrier population induced by the laser pulse. We derive and solve numerically a diffusion equation for an initial gaussian carrier concentration profile, employing a diffusivity that decays exponentially in time as a result of the cooling of the excited carriers. Excellent agreement with the experimental results is found. Taken together, we demonstrate the existence of a transient carrier superdiffusive regime in semiconductors, and explain its origin. Our first direct observation of superdiffusion advances understanding of the excited carrier spatial dynamics in materials.
Results
Imaging the carrier dynamics
We image the carrier dynamics in samples of ptype and ntype silicon using SUEM. Briefly, the samples are excited with a 515 nm wavelength gaussian laser pulse with a fluence in the 0.16−1.28 mJ cm^{−2} range. Electron pulses with a controlled time delay between −760 ps and 3.32 ns rasterscan the surface, generating secondary electrons (SEs) which are then collected to form images. The time and space resolutions are, respectively, 2 ps and 200 nm. To enhance the signal, the background is removed by subtracting a reference image recorded before optical excitation (at −760 ps) from the images recorded at different time delays. This approach yields ‘contrast images’, in which the bright and dark contrasts are interpreted as increased electron and hole concentrations, respectively. Since each excited carrier has a given cross section for generating SEs during its lifetime, the total rate of SE emission is expected to increase linearly with carrier concentration. This result is consistent with the increased intensity of the SUEM images observed for increasing fluence values. For a given material, the number of emitted SEs also depends on the surface topography, chemical composition, and local fields^{19}. Removal of the background ensures that the observed contrast reflects only the changes in local carrier density due optical excitation. A schematic of the experiment is shown in Fig. 1, and experimental details are given in the Methods section.
Figure 2 shows contrast images recorded for our ntype and ptype silicon samples. Because the samples are highly doped, a large excess of excited holes (electrons) are generated in ntype (ptype) silicon upon laser excitation. The contrast images thus represent the evolution of excess electrons and holes in ptype and ntype silicon, respectively. A bright contrast is seen for excess electrons (Fig. 2a), and a dark contrast for excess holes (Fig. 2b), both mapping the spatial distribution of excited carriers. These images, collected at several time delays, are used to construct movies of the carrier dynamics (see Supplementary Movies 1 and 2 for electron and hole dynamics, respectively).
Following the optical excitation, the contrast images for ptype silicon (Fig. 2a) show a bright spot, the intensity of which increases monotonically and peaks at a delay time of t=50 ps. The bright contrast reflects the increased electron concentration near the surface, with a gaussian profile at t=50 ps closely resembling that of the laser intensity on the surface. We attribute the brightness increase up to 50 ps after excitation to a redistribution of the excited electron energy due to ultrafast electronelectron and electronphonon scattering processes^{2,10}. After generating the initial population through a monochromatic excitation, the energy distribution of the excited electrons becomes broader due to scattering, thus transferring carriers in the highenergy states that contribute substantially to the SE emission signal (Fig. 1). The band bending and local potential at the surface can further delay SE emission^{20}.
At times greater than 50 ps, two main trends are visible in Fig. 2a. First, the electrons undergo cooling, thus decreasing their average energy and the SE signal intensity. Second, the electron population diffuses laterally, giving rise to broader spatial concentration profiles. The progressive decrease in brightness and increase in the size of the bright area are consistent with these two trends. Analysis of the population distributions (see below) shows that the lateral diffusion of the electrons is much faster at short times t<250 ps than the typical diffusion in silicon at room temperature. For times longer than ∼500 ps, a slower diffusion regime is established, with an electron diffusivity value typical of silicon at room temperature. The bright contrast ultimately disappears within 30 ns due to carrier recombination. We note that no bright signal is visible at negative times, suggesting that the sample returns to equilibrium between two pulses separated by 200 ns. This guarantees that the measured spatiotemporal dynamics is not biased by the pulsed excitation.
Hole carriers in ntype silicon exhibit a similar spatiotemporal dynamics, as seen by the dark contrast images in Fig. 2b. Here the dark contrast is associated with a decreased electron concentration (with respect to the sample before illumination), representing the formation of an excess concentration of excited holes. The dark contrast reaches a maximum intensity at 107 ps, which is longer than the 50 ps for the the bright contrast maximum seen for electrons (Fig. 2a). We attribute this difference to the different initial energy distributions of the excited electrons and holes, and the fact that the electron mobility in silicon is three times higher than the hole mobility, which induces different carrier dynamics for electrons and holes near the surface.
Similar to the bright contrast for electrons, the hole spatial distribution becomes broader, expanding rapidly between 107 and 260 ps. In addition, the dark contrast decreases beyond 107 ps, due to cooling and lateral diffusion of the holes. Analysis of the hole spatial distributions (see below) shows that, similar to the electron case, after a transient characterized by very high diffusivity values, diffusion at t>260 ps becomes significantly slower, reaching the room temperature diffusivity for holes in silicon at ∼500 ps time delay. The sample then returns to equilibrium after 30 ns, as seen by the disappearance of the dark contrast. For completeness, contrast images showing the electron and hole distributions at the same set of delay times are given in Supplementary Fig. 1.
Analysis of the carrier distributions
To study the excited carrier transport quantitatively, we obtain the second moment of the electron and hole distributions, , by separately analysing the contrast images of electrons and holes:
where I(x_{i}, y_{j}, t) is the intensity of the pixel located at the discrete surface coordinates (x_{i}, y_{j}) scanned by the electron probe, for the snapshot recorded at time t. The center of the distribution, which is determined from the data and does not shift during the dynamics, is taken to be the origin of the x and y axes in equation (1). In an ideally diffusive behaviour, is a linear function of time, with a slope proportional to the diffusivity D (i.e., the diffusion coefficient). For the twodimensional diffusion probed in the SUEM images, the second moment and diffusivity are related by =4Dt, so that the diffusivity is obtained as
Figure 3 shows the time evolution of the second moment of the excited electron and hole distributions. We find two clearly distinct transport regimes for both electrons and holes. An initial transient diffusive regime is characterized by a large diffusivity D≈10,000 cm^{2}s^{−1}, namely, a value ∼100−1,000 times higher than the room temperature diffusivity in silicon, D_{0}≈20−30 cm^{2}s^{−1} (ref. 18). This transient is associated with a superdiffusive expansion of the excited carrier spatial distribution, occurring on an ultrafast time scale of 100−200 ps. A significantly slower diffusion regime rapidly sets in after ∼500 ps, with associated diffusivity values (extracted from the second moment) of 30−40 cm^{2}s^{−1}, in very good agreement with the room temperature diffusivity D_{0}^{18}. While both electrons and holes exhibit the transient superdiffusive behaviour, the transient diffusivity values of the electrons are higher by a factor of 2−3 than those of the holes, consistent with the higher value of the electron mobility.
Figure 4 shows the diffusivity as a function of laser fluence in the two regimes found here, namely, the superdiffusive transport and the slower steadystate diffusive regime. The transient diffusivity is seen to increase monotonically with fluence for both electrons and holes. It follows a nearly linear trend, increasing from ∼8,000 cm^{2}s^{−1} at 0.16 mJ cm^{−2} fluence to ∼30,000 cm^{2}s^{−1} at 1.28 mJ cm^{−2} fluence for the electrons, and from ∼2,000 to ∼11,000 cm^{2}s^{−1} for the holes over the same fluence range. The slow diffusivity, on the other hand, remains relatively constant as a function of fluence. This trend is consistent with our interpretation of the slow diffusion regime as the steadystate diffusion of carriers in equilibrium with the environment, with an associated room temperature diffusivity D_{0} given above.
Theory and numerical modelling
In what follows, we present a model to describe transport of excited carriers in our experiments. Establishing the initial conditions for the model is particularly important, as explained next. Using the experimental absorption in silicon at 515 nm wavelength^{21}, we estimate that excited carrier concentrations of 8 × 10^{19} cm^{−3} are induced by the laser. For the laser power density used here, which is roughly 5 GW cm^{−2} for the highest fluence of 1.28 mJ cm^{−2}, twophoton absorption processes in Si^{22} are negligible as they make up only 2% of the optical transitions. The average initial excited carrier temperature T*(0) can be estimated from the energy E given out to the carriers by a photon^{23}, with E=2.4 eV in our experiment. We thus obtain T*(0)=E/k_{B}≈28,000 K in our conditions, namely, an initial carrier average temperature that far exceeds the Fermi temperature, leading to the formation of a nondegenerate carrier gas.
Following absorption, fast (tens of fs) electronelectron scattering processes rapidly establish a broad distribution of carrier energies; for carriers in the highenergy tail, the effective temperatures can be significantly greater than the average temperature. Gitomer et al.^{24} have obtained the highest temperature reached by hot carriers under highintensity laser illumination by measuring the bremsstrahlung xray spectrum. For the ∼5 GW cm^{−2} power density employed here, they found the highest carrier energy to be of order 30 eV, that is, a maximum T*(0)=3.5 × 10^{5} K. Because the SUEM technique measures emitted SEs, it is highly sensitive to the carrier energy, with more energetic electrons leading to higher SE emission. We reason therefore that our measurements, which rely on emitted SEs, preferentially observe the diffusion of carriers in the high energy tail of the excited carrier distribution (Fig. 1). Accordingly, we expect to observe effective carrier temperatures in the ∼1−5 × 10^{5} K range. Given the large carrier kinetic energies associated with these temperatures, we neglect electronelectron interactions in our model.
In our nondegenerate excited carrier gas, the local equation of state can thus be approximated with that of an ideal gas, P(r,t)=c(r,t)k_{B}T*(r,t), where P is the pressure, c(r,t) the carrier concentration at position r and time t, k_{B} is Boltzmann’s constant, and T*(r,t) is the effective temperature of the excited carriers, which are assumed to achieve a hot FermiDirac distribution shortly (∼1 ps) after excitation^{2}. Since the light absorption depth in silicon at 515 nm wavelength is orders of magnitude greater than the ∼10 nm depth for SE emission, the excited carrier concentration is approximately constant in the surfacenormal direction within 10 nm below the surface. We can thus use polar coordinates to describe the inplane diffusion of the excited carriers, and further approximate the carrier concentration by removing its angular dependence (that is, assuming circular inplane symmetry). The shape of the initial carrier concentration is chosen to be a gaussian in the radial coordinate r, consistent with the SUEM image profile and reflecting the shape of the laser pulse. The carrier distribution at all times, normalized to the total excited carrier concentration c_{0}, reads:
where σ^{2}(t) is the second moment of the spatial concentration distribution, that is, the physical quantity used above to analyse the SUEM images (equation (1)). The gaussian laser beam used in the experiment is elliptical with 40 and 50 μm minor and major radii, respectively. We approximate it with a radial gaussian beam, and fit its initial width to experiment.
The experimentally observed linear dependence of versus time in both the transient and steady state regimes inherently implies a diffusive regime for carrier transport. We thus derive a diffusion model to explain the observed experimental trends. The diffusion equation employed in this work can be obtained from the continuity equation, ∂c/∂t=−∇·J, where J is the carrier flux. In the typical treatment of carrier diffusion at room temperature in semiconductors^{25}, the flux is proportional to the concentration gradient, J=−D_{0}∇c, leading to the diffusion equation ∂c/∂t=D_{0}∇^{2}c. Here we generalize this approach by treating carrier transport as the result of the large pressure gradient within the excited carrier gas. We write the flux as J=c(r,t)v, where the velocity v=μ F/e is defined by the force F=−∇P/c due to the pressure gradient; μ is the electron mobility and e the electron charge. Using the equation of state, we find:
We neglect the temperature gradient within the area excited by the laser, and assume that the effective temperature of the excited carriers decays exponentially with a characteristic relaxation time τ:
to the equilibrium environment temperature T_{0} (here, 300 K), starting from an initial excited carrier temperature . Substituting T*(t) in equation (3), neglecting the temperature gradients and using the continuity equation, we obtain a modified diffusion equation in the radial coordinate r:
where D_{0}=μk_{B}T_{0}/e is the Einstein relation^{25} for the room temperature diffusivity of thermalized carriers, and D*(t)=[μk_{B}T*(0)e^{−t/τ}]/e is the transient diffusivity due to the excess energy of the excited carriers. It is seen that D*(t) decays exponentially over a time scale of a few relaxation times. Note that we neglect the temperature dependence of the mobility, which is weak for our highly doped samples^{26} and controlled by the lattice (as opposed to the much higher electronic) temperature. We stress that our model, through equation (4), implies a continuous cooling of the carriers, with a relaxation time dependent on the particular experimental conditions.
We solved equation (5) both analytically and numerically with a zeroflux boundary condition at large r (see the Methods section). Given the initial gaussian distribution, it can be shown straightforwardly that equation (5) yields a gaussian distribution at all times, so that the spatial dynamics can be characterized by the second moment (t)=σ^{2}(t), computed here from the simulations. Figure 3 shows our numerical results for the second moments of electron and holes as a function of time, along with the experimentally obtained second moments. Our results correctly predict the presence of two distinct diffusion regimes (in spite of the assumed continuous cooling), namely, transient and steadystate diffusion in the presence of an exponentially decaying diffusivity. Our simulations show that the carrier spatial distribution expands rapidly due to the large concentration and pressure gradients. Once the transient diffusivity term D* dies out after ∼500 ps, a steady state diffusion regime with diffusivity D_{0} is reached. When relaxation times and initial conditions obtained from experimental fits are employed, our model achieves excellent quantitative agreement with the experimentally measured second moments, in both the transient and steady state regimes (see Fig. 3). To obtain the numerical data in Fig. 3, we employ bestfit values for the relaxation time τ and initial temperature T*(0) of τ=77 ps and T*(0)≈4 × 10^{5} K for the electrons, and τ=161 ps and T*(0)≈2.7 × 10^{5} K for the holes. As discussed above, these effective carrier temperatures of order 1−5 × 10^{5} K are consistent with our experimental conditions, and are a consequence of the fact that SUEM preferentially measures the signal from highenergy carriers within the excited carrier distribution. We believe other carriers with lower temperature and diffusivity, associated with weaker signal than the higher energy fastdiffusing carriers, are also present though not directly observed.
The relaxation time can be interpreted as the decay time for the sample to return to equilibrium with the environment after excitation with the laser pulse. In this process, the carriers lose energy through phonon emission with a time scale of ∼1 ps eV^{−1} (ref. 10), giving an overall cooling time of up to 10−50 ps for the initial carrier energies in our experiment. Note that the high carrier density regime probed here is distinct from the low density regime, in which hot carriers thermalize in a few ps^{10,27}. Different from the low density regime, both hot phonon effects, which are known to increase the carrier cooling times by 2–3 orders of magnitude at our carrier density, and screening of the electronphonon interaction can contribute in our experiment to increasing the diffusivity decay time constant. While the relaxation time generally depends on carrier density, this dependence does not affect our measured transient diffusivity, since for each given fluence value the average carrier density is nearly constant throughout our experiment. The phonon population also equilibrates and dissipates heat to the environment, with timescales typically one order of magnitude longer than electron cooling. Overall, the known timescales for electron and phonon dynamics are consistent with the 100−500 ps equilibration times obtained here.
Firstprinciples calculations
We close this section by presenting firstprinciples density functional theory (DFT) calculations (see the Methods section). To obtain microscopic insight into the diffusion dynamics, we treat the diffusion process as a twodimensional random walk of excited carriers. Since the pump pulse is short and does not overlap in time with the diffusive dynamics, on the time scale of interest (10 ps−10 ns) the carriers move randomly at their average thermal velocity, and scatter with ionized impurities and phonons with an average scattering time τ_{S}. For carriers with an average square thermal velocity , the diffusivity can be written as D=τ_{S}/4 (ref. 28). We compute the bandstructure and the density of states of silicon to obtain the average square thermal velocity (T) as a function of electron temperature T, for T up to ∼10^{6} K (see the Methods section). We use this information together with the experimental room temperature diffusivity, D_{0}≈30 cm^{2}s^{−1}, to estimate the scattering time τ_{S}=4D_{0}/(T) for electrons at room temperature, and obtain τ_{S}≈0.8 ps. The Brooks–Herring formula^{26} for ionized impurity scattering, applied to silicon in the same conditions, yields a similar value of τ_{S}≈0.4 ps, in agreement with the fact that at room temperature electron scattering in silicon with a dopant concentration of 10^{19} cm^{−3} is dominated by ionized impurity scattering^{26}.
We then estimate the initial excited electron temperature T*(0) using the following argument. As the electrons cool after excitation with the pump pulse, the lattice temperature increases as energy is transferred to the lattice through electronphonon coupling. While the electron temperature reaches high values of up to ∼10^{5} K, the lattice temperature increase is limited by the much higher heat capacity of the lattice compared to the carriers, and also by the fact that the sample dissipates heat into the environment. From the fact that the samples do not melt on the surface, we infer the lattice temperature never exceeds ∼1,000 K in our experiments. The electron mobility, which is proportional to the scattering time τ_{S}, is controlled by electronphonon scattering (and thus by the lattice temperature) above ∼500 K for our dopant concentration^{26}. The mobility varies only by less than an order of magnitude in the 300−1,000 K range for our dopant concentration^{26}, an indication that τ_{S} is only moderately affected by the increased lattice temperature. For these reasons, we assume that τ_{S} is nearly unchanged after the pump excites the carriers.
We thus use the scattering time τ_{S} obtained at room temperature, together with (T) obtained from DFT, to compute the initial excited electron temperature T*(0) for which D*=(T*(0))τ_{S}/4, where D*≈30,000 cm^{2}s^{−1} is the experimental electron diffusivity in the superdiffusive regime. This calculation yields an estimated value of the initial electron temperature of T*(0)≈8 × 10^{5} K, in very good agreement with our fitted electronic temperature of 4 × 10^{5} K. This result confirms that the superdiffusive regime is consistent with the random thermal motion of a very hot degenerate electron gas generated at the surface by the pump pulse.
Discussion
The optimal fitting parameters employed in our diffusion model lead to carrier dynamics in excellent agreement with experiment. We quantitatively reproduce the observed experimental trends, and explain the origin of the ultrafast superdiffusion in terms of a large transient diffusivity induced by the excess energy of the excited carriers. This picture is confirmed by our firstprinciples calculations. We highlight that our model does not bias the interpretation of the experimental data; it merely relies on diffusion theory, in accordance with the observed trends for the second moments. While in this work we employ fitting parameters and simple firstprinciples calculations, future work will attempt to model SUEM experiments entirely from first principles^{10,11} by studying SE emission in the presence of a timedependent excited carrier population.
In summary, we characterize the spatiotemporal dynamics of excited carriers in silicon, and for the first time directly observe a superdiffusive transport regime originating from the high effective temperature and kinetic energy of a fraction of the excited carriers. These findings are critical for understanding ultrafast charge and spin dynamics in materials.
Methods
Experimental details
We employ ptype and ntype silicon wafers with doping concentrations of 2.1 × 10^{19} cm^{−3} and 1.2 × 10^{19} cm^{−3}, respectively. They were purchased from MTI Corp and used without modifications. The samples are cleaved and immediately transferred into the high vacuum (1.2 × 10^{−6} Torr) SUEM chamber. To obtain spatiotemporal evolution images with SUEM (see below), the samples were excited with a 515 nm wavelength gaussian laser pulse with a fluence in the 0.16−1.28 mJ cm^{−2} range and a 5 MHz repetition rate. The SUEM operation is briefly summarized here, and discussed extensively elsewhere^{29}. In the SUEM, femtosecond infrared pulses (1,030 nm wavelength, 300 fs duration, 5 MHz repetition rate) were generated from a ClarkMXR fiber laser system and used to produce green (515 nm) and UV (257 nm) pulses. The green light excites the specimen while the UV light is directed toward the photocathode, which in response emits short electron pulses employed to probe the carrier dynamics (Fig. 1). The time delay between the pump and probe pulses is controlled by a delay line, covering a range between −760 ps to 3.32 ns, here with a snapshot resolution of 2.0 ps. The electron pulses, accelerated to 30.0 kV by electrostatic lenses, rasterscan the surface, generating secondary electrons (SEs) which are then collected by an Everhart–Thornley detector and translated into pixel intensities to form images. Our measurements achieve a 200 nm resolution sufficient to resolve the μmscale spatial dynamics examined in this work. We have additionally shown in previous work^{29} that this resolution can be made better than 10 nm, enabling studies of carrier dynamics in nanomaterials. While the volume excited by the electron pulse can extend deep into the sample, the SEs are only emitted from the top 5−10 nm below the surface, thus providing surface sensitive information^{30}.
Numerical solution of the diffusion equation
We implement and solve the diffusion equation using MATLAB. We employ polar coordinates, and use an adaptive time step integrator to evolve in time the carrier concentration, which is approximated at time zero by a gaussian in the radial coordinate. The second moment of the initial distribution is obtained by fitting the images with maximum contrast, which are collected at delay times of 50 ps for electrons and 107 ps for holes. These times are chosen, respectively, as the initial times for the numerical simulations. Note that our model for carrier diffusion can also be solved analytically; the numerical simulations are employed both to validate the analytical solution and to investigate the effect of a nonuniform temperature, which cannot be studied analytically, as described next. The extent of the spatial region over which the excited carriers thermalize is not obvious a priori. Several scattering events are needed to establish a hot FermiDirac distribution, and thus a region spanning several mean free paths is necessary to establish a local temperature within the carrier gas. Given the large thermal velocities of the excited carriers, this region can span the entire laser spot area. Accordingly, the model presented in the manuscript assumes a nearly constant electron temperature in the region of interest for the dynamics, which allows us to neglect the temperature gradient in equation (3). We have also carried out numerical simulations for a model that includes a spatially varying temperature, which is included in the diffusion equation through the temperature gradient in equation (3). We approximate the initial temperature distribution with a gaussian spatial profile with the same shape as the intensity profile of the laser. Using this nonuniform temperature distribution, which is taken to decay exponentially in time as for the uniform distribution in equation (4), we obtain a diffusion equation that cannot be solved analytically. We solve this modified diffusion equation by timestepping both the carrier concentration and their temperature (see Supplementary Fig. 2 for details), and find that the second moment (t) and the carrier concentration are nearly the same as in the simplified model with uniform temperature presented above. The results comparing the second moment (t) for the uniform and gaussian spatial temperature distributions are shown in Supplementary Fig. 2.
Firstprinciples calculations
We carry out density functional theory (DFT) calculations on silicon with a relaxed lattice constant of 10.2 bohr, using the local density approximation (LDA)^{31} and a plane wave basis with the Quantum ESPRESSO code^{32}. Normconserving pseudopotentials^{33} and a planewave kinetic energy cutoff of 90 Ry are employed to obtain the ground state charge density. The density of states D(E) is obtained for energies E up to 500 eV above the conduction band minimum (CBM) with a 100 × 100 × 100 kpoint grid in the Brillouin zone (BZ). The bandstructure in the [100] direction, which is taken here to be the x direction and corresponds to the Γ−X direction in the BZ, is also computed for energies up to ∼500 eV above the CBM. The calculation includes ∼1,000 empty bands and a fine kpoint grid in the Γ−X direction. The square velocity in the x direction, , is computed for each KohnSham state with band index n and crystal momentum k as , using a discrete derivative obtained from the energy of adjacent kpoints along Γ−X. The square velocities are then binned in energy and averaged within the energy bin, to obtain an average square velocity (E) as a smooth function of the electron energy E. This quantity is then employed, together with the density of states, to compute the average square velocity for the electrons as a function of temperature:
where T is the electronic temperature, and f(E, T, μ) the FermiDirac occupation for a chemical potential μ, which for our value of ∼10^{19} cm^{−3} excited electrons is ∼50 meV below the CBM energy E_{C}^{26}.
Two sets of calculations are then carried out. At room temperature (here T=300 K), we sample the CBM with a fine kpoint grid, so that the ∼25 meV energy window above the CBM for which f(E, T, μ) is nonzero is accurately sampled. Using the square velocity at 300 K computed using equation (6), we first compute the room temperature carrier scattering time τ_{S} from the experimental value of the diffusivity D_{0} at room temperature:
where we used the equation given in the main text, τ_{S}=4D_{0}/(T), together with , as is appropriate for a twodimensional isotropic surface. Using the scattering time computed at room temperature, and thus neglecting the change in the scattering time on excitation as discussed in the main text, we compute the initial excited carrier temperature T*(0) in the superdiffusive regime by solving the equation:
where D*≈30,000 cm^{2}s^{−1} is the electron diffusivity in the superdiffusive regime. We obtain a value of T*(0)=8 × 10^{5} K, in very good agreement with our fitted electronic temperature of 4 × 10^{5} K.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on request.
Additional information
How to cite this article: Najafi, E. et al. Superdiffusion of excited carriers in semiconductors. Nat. Commun. 8, 15177 doi: 10.1038/ncomms15177 (2017).
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
 1
Othonos, A. Probing ultrafast carrier and phonon dynamics in semiconductors. J. Appl. Phys. 83, 1789–1830 (1998).
 2
Shah, J. Ultrafast Spectroscopy of Semiconductors and Semiconductor Nanostructures vol. 115, Springer (1999).
 3
Mehl, B. P., Kirschbrown, J. R., Gabriel, M. M., House, R. L. & Papanikolas, J. M. Pumpprobe microscopy: spatially resolved carrier dynamics in ZnO rods and the influence of optical cavity resonator modes. J. Phys. Chem. B 117, 4390–4398 (2013).
 4
Flannigan, D. J. & Zewail, A. H. 4D electron microscopy: principles and applications. Acc. Chem. Res. 45, 1828–1839 (2012).
 5
Najafi, E., Scarborough, T. D., Tang, J. & Zewail, A. Fourdimensional imaging of carrier interface dynamics in pn junctions. Science 347, 164–167 (2015).
 6
Bose, R. et al. Realspace visualization of energy loss and carrier diffusion in a semiconductor nanowire array using 4D electron microscopy. Adv. Mater. 28, 5106–5111 (2016).
 7
Sun, J., Adhikari, A., Shaheen, B. S., Yang, H. & Mohammed, O. F. Mapping carrier dynamics on material surfaces in space and time using scanning ultrafast electron microscopy. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 7, 985–994 (2016).
 8
Eschenlohr, A. et al. Ultrafast spin transport as key to femtosecond demagnetization. Nat. Mater. 12, 332–336 (2013).
 9
Bigot, J.Y., Vomir, M. & Beaurepaire, E. Coherent ultrafast magnetism induced by femtosecond laser pulses. Nat. Phys. 5, 515–520 (2009).
 10
Bernardi, M., VigilFowler, D., Lischner, J., Neaton, J. B. & Louie, S. G. Ab initio study of hot carriers in the first picosecond after sunlight absorption in silicon. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 257402 (2014).
 11
Bernardi, M., VigilFowler, D., Ong, C. S., Neaton, J. B. & Louie, S. G. Ab initio study of hot electrons in GaAs. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 5291–5296 (2015).
 12
Bernardi, M., Mustafa, J., Neaton, J. B. & Louie, S. G. Theory and computation of hot carriers generated by surface plasmon polaritons in noble metals. Nat. Commun. 6, 7044 (2015).
 13
Palummo, M., Bernardi, M. & Grossman, J. C. Exciton radiative lifetimes in twodimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. Nano Lett. 15, 2794–2800 (2015).
 14
Rozzi, C. et al. Quantum coherence controls the charge separation in a prototypical artificial lightharvesting system. Nat. Commun. 4, 1602–1602 (2012).
 15
Kanter, E. P. et al. Characterization of the spatiotemporal evolution of lasergenerated plasmas. J. Appl. Phys. 104, 073307 (2008).
 16
Haug, H., Jauho, A.P. & Cardona, M. Quantum Kinetics in Transport and Optics of Semiconductors Vol. 2, Springer (2008).
 17
Smith, H. & Jensen, H. H. Transport Phenomena Oxford University Press (1989).
 18
Brunetti, R. et al. Diffusion coefficient of electrons in silicon. J. Appl. Phys. 52, 6713–6722 (1981).
 19
Goldstein, J. et al. Scanning Electron Microscopy and Xray Microanalysis Springer (2007).
 20
Kronik, L. & Shapira, Y. Surface photovoltage phenomena: theory, experiment, and applications. Surf. Sci. Rep 37, 1–206 (1999).
 21
Green, M. A. Selfconsistent optical parameters of intrinsic silicon at 300 K including temperature coefficients. Sol. Energ. Mat. Sol. Cells 92, 1305–1310 (2008).
 22
Reitze, D., Zhang, T., Wood, W. M. & Downer, M. C. Twophoton spectroscopy of silicon using femtosecond pulses at abovegap frequencies. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 7, 84–89 (1990).
 23
Balkan, N. in Hot Electrons in Semiconductors: Physics and Devices 5th edn Oxford University Press on Demand (1998).
 24
Gitomer, S. et al. Fast ions and hot electrons in the laserplasma interaction. Phys. Fluids 29, 2679–2688 (1986).
 25
Streetman, B. G. & Banerjee, S. in Solid State Electronic Devices 5th edn Prentice Hall (2000).
 26
Peter, Y. & Cardona, M. Fundamentals of Semiconductors: Physics and Materials Properties Springer (2010).
 27
Ichibayashi, T. & Tanimura, K. Ultrafast carrier relaxation in Si studied by timeresolved twophoton photoemission spectroscopy: intravalley scattering and energy relaxation of hot electrons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 087403 (2009).
 28
Balluffi, R. W., Allen, S. & Carter, W. C. Kinetics of Materials Wiley (2005).
 29
Mohammed, O. F., Yang, D.S., Pal, S. K. & Zewail, A. H. 4D scanning ultrafast electron microscopy: visualization of materials surface dynamics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 7708–7711 (2011).
 30
Lin, Y. & Joy, D. C. A new examination of secondary electron yield data. Surf. Interface Anal. 37, 895–900 (2005).
 31
Perdew, J. P. & Zunger, A. Selfinteraction correction to densityfunctional approximations for manyelectron systems. Phys. Rev. B 23, 5048–5079 (1981).
 32
Giannozzi, P. et al. QUANTUM ESPRESSO: a modular and opensource software project for quantum simulations of materials. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 21, 395502 (2009).
 33
Troullier, N. & Martins, J. L. Efficient pseudopotentials for planewave calculations. Phys. Rev. B 43, 1993–2006 (1991).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by NSF grant DMR0964886 and Air Force Office of Scientific Research grant FA95501110055 in the Physical Biology Center for Ultrafast Science and Technology at California Institute of Technology, which is supported by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation. M.B. thanks the California Institute of Technology for a startup fund. V.I. and M.B. gratefully acknowledge support by the CaltechGIST program. This research used resources of the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center, a DOE Office of Science User Facility supported by the Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DEAC0205CH11231.
Author information
Affiliations
Contributions
E.N. and A.Z. conceived and designed the experiments. E.N. carried out the experiments and analysed the data. V.I. and M.B. developed the theory and carried out numerical simulations and ab initio calculations. E.N. and M.B. wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Figures (PDF 3585 kb)
Supplementary Movie 1
Ultrafast dynamics of electrons in ptype Si, obtained from a sequence of scanning ultrafast electron microscopy (SUEM) images. (MOV 2058 kb)
Supplementary Movie 2
Ultrafast dynamics of holes in ntype Si, obtained from a sequence of scanning ultrafast electron microscopy (SUEM) images. (MOV 2008 kb)
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Najafi, E., Ivanov, V., Zewail, A. et al. Superdiffusion of excited carriers in semiconductors. Nat Commun 8, 15177 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15177
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Further reading

ExcitedState Imaging of Single Particles on the Subnanometer Scale
Annual Review of Physical Chemistry (2020)

Hotcarrier transfer at photocatalytic silicon/platinum interfaces
The Journal of Chemical Physics (2020)

Generalized FokkerPlanck equations derived from nonextensive entropies asymptotically equivalent to BoltzmannGibbs
Physical Review E (2020)

Hot exciton transport in WSe2 monolayers
Physical Review B (2019)

Extraordinary Carrier Diffusion on CdTe Surfaces Uncovered by 4D Electron Microscopy
Chem (2019)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.