Photostriction of strontium ruthenate


Transition metal oxides with a perovskite crystal structure exhibit a variety of physical properties associated with the lattice. Among these materials, strontium ruthenate (SrRuO3) displays unusually strong coupling of charge, spin and lattice degrees of freedom that can give rise to the photostriction, that is, changes in the dimensions of material due to the absorption of light. In this study, we observe a photon-induced strain as high as 1.12% in single domain SrRuO3, which we attribute to a nonequilibrium of phonons that are a result of the strong interaction between the crystalline lattice and electrons excited by light. In addition, these light-induced changes in the SrRuO3 lattice affect its electrical resistance. The observation of both photostriction and photoresistance in SrRuO3 suggests the possibility of utilizing the mechanical and optical functionalities of the material for next-generation optoelectronics, such as remote switches, light-controlled elastic micromotors, microactuators and other optomechanical systems.


In recent decades, developing clean energy technology has become a major scientific challenge. As we aim to relieve our dependence on fossil fuels, scientists have studied new ways of generating electrical energy, such as solar cells1, fuel cells2, nanogenerators3 and more. However, another approach to green technology is the development of novel materials that use clean sources of energy directly to produce a physical response, thus bypassing the need to generate electricity altogether. One example of this is photostriction, the property in which a material directly converts light into mechanical energy. This generation of strain can then be harnessed for wireless remote control applications, such as photostrictive actuators4,5, energy harvesting devices6 and other optomechanical sensors7.

Many materials show photostrictive behaviour, including ferroelectrics8,9,10, organic polymers11,12 and inorganic semiconductors13,14,15. However, the mechanisms of the photostrictive effect vary depending on the material and are often poorly understood, thus limiting practical applications. For example, light-induced deformation in nonpolar semiconductors, such as crystalline germanium and silicon, is due to a slight change in the atomic bond length induced by excess excited carriers in the conduction band. However, the resulting strain is very small (0.08% and 0.09% for germanium and silicon, respectively)16. In organic polymer systems, larger strain is obtained through photo-induced molecular reorientation or ionization reactions17. However, these materials are often unstable in air or at high temperatures. Finally, the photostrictive effect in most ferroelectric materials occurs through a combination of the photovoltaic effect and the converse piezoelectric effect, yet it can only be observed below the Curie temperature18,19 or in nanoscale structures20. Kundys et al.21 measured a substantial visible-light-induced size change in ferroelectric BiFeO3 (BFO) crystals using a capacitance dilatometer that has to date displayed the fastest photostrictive response (ps to ns)17.

In our search for new photostrictive materials, we decided to explore the transition metal oxide with perovskite structure, SrRuO3 (SRO). SRO has received increasing attention due to its high absorption across the visible spectrum22 and strong coupling of charge, spin and lattice degrees of freedom at room temperature23. The absorption coefficient of SRO at 532 nm is 2 × 105 cm−1, and this is 25 times higher than silicon and one order of magnitude greater than BFO23,24. In addition, transition metal oxides are among the most interesting materials due to their unique blend of multiple physical properties, including superconductivity25,26, piezoelectricity27,28,29, ferroelectricity30,31, semiconductivity32 and thermoelectricity33,34.

The deformation or rotation of the corner-sharing octahedral oxygen (for example, BO6) in perovskite structures plays an important role in determining the magnetic and electronic properties35,36,37 of the material. The metallic perovskite SRO shows significant hybridization between the O 2p and Ru 4d orbitals38, thus leading to a strong coupling of the lattice degrees of freedom39 and electromagnetic properties40,41. Therefore, we expected that a large physical deformation of SRO could be induced by visible light at room temperature, though this has yet to be explored.

In this study, we use micro-Raman scattering to monitor shifts in the optical phonon Ag mode of SRO to indicate light-induced deformation of the SRO thin films42. We also explore how excitation power and temperature affected photostriction in single- and multi-domain SRO structures. In single-domain SRO films at 300 K, we measure the maximum light-induced deformation and photostrictive efficiency to be as high as 1.12% and 7 × 10−16 m3 W−1, respectively. Moreover, we observe that the magnitude of SRO electrical resistance could be controlled with light that also originates from the material’s photo-induced deformation behaviour. The strong photostrictive effect of SRO at room temperature offers an attractive route for future devices that can be controlled by means of light alone.


Characterization of sample

We began the study by growing 40 nm thick (001)-oriented SRO thin films on a pseudocubic (001) SrTiO3 (STO) substrate using pulsed laser deposition (see Methods for more details). A cross-sectional high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM) image of the SRO/STO sample is shown in Supplementary Fig. 1, demonstrating that the SRO features superior crystallinity and a clear lattice structure. The SRO/STO sample features a sharp interface without observable interdiffusion of the species across the boundary.

Raman selection rules

At room temperature, SRO has an orthorhombic perovskite structure with the space group Pnma43. According to nuclear site group analysis, there are 24 Raman active zone-centre optical phonon modes in SRO (7Ag, 5B1g, 7B2g and 5B3g)44. We first examined SRO thin films using Raman spectroscopy, bearing in mind the Raman selection rules. Fig. 1a shows the polarized Raman spectra of (001)-oriented SRO thin films on the STO substrate, employing a normal-incidence backscattering geometry. The sample was rotated around the perpendicular axis with a rotation angle, θ. We assigned the intense peak at 372 cm−1 to the Ag symmetry mode (an in-plane vibrational mode of O atoms)45. Since the Ag mode is an in-plane vibrational mode, which shows much higher intensity than other modes, we analysed the in-plane photostrictive effect of SRO by measuring the shift in this peak. The corresponding Raman tensor and scattering intensity of the Ag mode are given by:

Figure 1: Polarization-dependent Raman scattering.

(a) Raman spectra of the Ag phonon mode recorded at the rotation angle, θ, of an (001)-oriented SrRuO3 thin film epitaxially grown on an (001) SrTiO3 substrate. The vertical dashed lines indicate the positions of the Ag phonon modes of SrRuO3. (b) The rotation angle dependence of the intensity of the Ag phonon mode at 372 cm−1. The solid line represents the best fit to the calculated intensity of the Ag phonon mode. The inset shows the normal backscattering geometry used in the polarized Raman scattering system. The arrow represents the propagation and polarization directions of the incident and scattered light, respectively.

where α, β and γ are the Ag tensor components along the x, y and z directions, respectively46. Considering the expression of the Raman scattering tensor, the Ag mode can be detected in both Z(XX)Z and Z(YY)Z configurations due to the symmetry properties of the material, in which X,Y and Z represent the lattice directions a,b and c, respectively. Using Z(XX)Z and Z(YY)Z, the two letters on both sides of the brackets represent the propagation direction of the incident and scattered light, respectively. The two letters inside the parentheses represent the polarizations of incident and scattered light, respectively. According to Raman selection rules, the intensity of the Ag mode of monocrystalline SRO is periodic with the polarization direction of the incident light. The intensity of the Ag mode as a function of θ is shown in Fig. 1b. The scattering intensity of the SRO thin films shows a 90° periodicity with a maximum amplitude at θ=10°,100°,190° and 280°, demonstrating that our SRO thin film sample was monocrystalline47.

Light-induced deformation of SRO

The generation of a reversible mechanical deformation in materials by the irradiation of light can be estimated from shifts in the Raman spectra, as the vibrational frequencies of the phonon modes change causing a Raman peak shift through the interatomic distances change48. We chose a polarized potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) laser with a wavelength of 532 nm to study the photostriction of SRO on the STO substrate under visible-light illumination (Fig. 2). As we monitored shifts in the Ag mode of the Raman spectra, we were able to estimate the light-induced SRO lattice strain using the following equation:

Figure 2: Photon-induced strain measurement of SrRuO3/SrTiO3.

The change in Raman frequency of the Ag phonon modes and the in-plane lattice variations are shown as a function of excitation intensity.

in which Δωj is the phonon frequency shift, Ki is the phonon deformation potential, assuming Ki associated with the stress along the lattice a,b and c axes is the same and equal to 845.93 cm−1 for the Ag mode (372 cm−1)49,50,51 and ɛxx, ɛyy and ɛzz are the lattice variations along the a,b and c axes, respectively52. Because the Ag mode is independent on the c axis, the equation becomes Δωj=Kiɛxx+Kiɛyy. Then, assuming the lattice variation along the a and b axes is the same (ɛxx=ɛyy), the equation can be further simplified to Δωj=2Kiɛxx (ref. 53).

Figure 2 summarizes the excitation power intensity-dependent Raman peak positions of the Ag mode and the corresponding SRO lattice variation (that is, strain). The Raman scattering spectra appear in the Fig. 3a. The peak position of the Ag mode exhibited an obvious redshift from 377.2 to 364.6 cm−1 with increased laser intensity, implying a significant correlation between excitation power intensity and lattice strain that would suggest SRO is a photostrictive material. After the laser intensity exceeded 50 W cm−2, the redshift of the Raman peak and deformation of the SRO thin film remained constant, indicating saturation of photostriction. Based on the previously derived equation (3), the SRO lattice strain reached a maximum value of 0.76%. We observed this phenomenon over several measurements, demonstrating the reversibility of the photostrictive effect in SRO thin films.

Figure 3: Dependence of photostriction of SrRuO3/SrTiO3 on temperature and excitation-power intensity.

Power-intensity-dependent Raman scattering spectra of SrRuO3 thin films at (a) 300 K, (b) 100 K and (c) 35 K, respectively. The arrow indicates the redshift of the Ag phonon mode induced by the photostrictive effect. (d) The Raman frequency of the Ag phonon mode (filled symbols) and lattice variation (open symbols) as a function of the power intensity at 300 K (circle symbols), 100 K (triangle symbols) and 35 K (square symbols), respectively.

To understand the substrate contributions for the photostrictive effect, we also measured the laser intensity-dependent Raman spectra of the STO substrate, as shown in Supplementary Fig. 2. As the 532 nm laser excitation intensity increased from 7.5 to 125 W cm−2, there was no obvious shift in the Raman peaks of the STO substrate. Therefore, we can rule out any contribution of the photostrictive effect from this material.

To also exclude laser-induced thermal expansion of the SRO thin film as the reason for the observed Ag mode peak shift, we also measured the ratio of the Stokes and anti-Stokes Raman scattering intensity to estimate the effective local temperature (Teff) at the laser focal point (Supplementary Fig. 3a). Teff as a function of the incident laser intensity is shown in the Supplementary Fig. 3b. There was no significant change in Teff with the laser intensity, demonstrating that we can neglect the laser-induced thermal expansion in the Raman measurements. (see Supplementary Note 1 for more details).

Additionally, the photostrictive effect of SRO saturates at laser intensities of >50 W cm−2 that is also inconsistent with light-induced heating effects11. To further exclude laser-induced thermal expansion, we also measured the temperature of the SRO thin films using a thermal camera under laser illumination. The noncontact temperature measurements of the SRO samples are shown in Supplementary Fig. 4. We observed a similar change in the surface temperature (2.3 °C increase) under laser illumination. This increase in temperature is too small to result in the large lattice strain on the scale of the photon-induced strain demonstrated in this study (see Supplementary Note 2 for more details).

Temperature-dependent photostriction of SRO

The temperature-dependent Raman spectra of SRO on the STO substrate using different laser illumination intensities are shown in Fig. 3a-c. The frequency shift, Δωj, and the calculated lattice variation of the SRO thin films are summarized in Fig. 3d. It is notable that the light-induced deformation of SRO decreases at lower temperatures. We hypothesize that above the Curie temperature (TC,SRO ≈ 144 K), SRO is paramagnetic and essentially has no magnetostriction23, which is the effect that occurs when the dimensions of ferromagnetic materials change during the process of magnetization. We believe the light-induced deformation of SRO can be attributed to a phenomenon involving a nonequilibrium of phonons that results from the strong interaction of the lattice and electrons excited by light. Generally, the mechanism of this nonequilibrium of phonons is related to the transfer of energy from light-excited carriers to optical phonons. These excited carriers can induce a large amplitude of lattice motions and then structural deformations by anharmonic couplings via strong electron–electron and electron–phonon interactions54. However, below the Curie temperature (< TC,SRO), SRO becomes ferromagnetic and displays magnetostrictive behaviour. As the laser illuminates SRO thin films, the polarized light changes the distribution of magnetic moments and static magnetization due to the inverse Faraday effect. As a result, such reoriented magnetization by light generates magnetostrictive stress to compress the lattice of SRO due to its negative magnetostriction coefficient55 (η −2.5 × 10−3) that competes with the phonon-mediated lattice expansion. Finally, the superposition of these two mechanisms leads to an insensitive photostrictive effect at lower temperatures (Fig. 3d).

Lattice domains impact the photostrictive effect

To further investigate how lattice domains impact the photostrictive effect, we used X-ray diffraction to examine two 40 nm thick (001) SRO thin films deposited on top of (001) STO and (001) DyScO3 (DSO) substrates. Figure 4a,b are the reciprocal space maps around the (104) reflection, showing that both the SRO films were coherently grown on the STO and DSO substrates, respectively. Moreover, to carefully inspect the detailed structural information of SRO on these two substrates, we took radial scans along the horizontal vector, H=1, with four orthogonal azimuthal angles, φ=0o, 90o, 180o and 270o (that is, (104), (014), (04) and (04) reflections of the substrates; Fig. 4c,d).

Figure 4: The reciprocal space maps of SrRuO3/SrTiO3 and SrRuO3/DyScO3.

The reciprocal space maps were taken around the (104) reflection of (a) SrTiO3 and (b) DyScO3. The corresponding radial scans along the horizontal vector, H=1 (the vertical dashed lines), with four orthogonal angles, φ=0o (black line), 90o (green line), 180o (orange line) and 270o (red line), were collected to inspect the domain structures of SrRuO3 thin films grown on (c) SrTiO3 and (d) DyScO3 substrates, respectively. In (c), the shift in peak due to the tilted angle along the a axis of SrRuO3 is labelled as I and III. Position II represents diffraction characteristics from the b axis of SrRuO3.

It is worth noting that all the main peaks of the SRO film on the STO substrate exhibited an asymmetric shape that can be viewed as the convolution of two peaks (Fig. 4c). These deconvoluted peaks can be attributed to the presence of multiple domains in the SRO because the pseudocubic forms a tilted angle along the a axis and a rectangular angle along the b axis in distorted orthorhombic SRO. This tilted angle causes the peak to shift when the sample is rotated from φ=0o to 180o, labelled as positions I and III in the radial scans. In addition, position II represents diffraction characteristics from the b axis of SRO. Therefore, the two peaks observed in each radial scan shows that the SRO film on the STO substrate possesses two domains. On the other hand, all the main peaks of SRO on the DSO substrate have a symmetric shape, indicating that the SRO film is a single domain (Fig. 4d). Such variation of the lattice domains can be ascribed to the structural difference of the STO and DSO substrates. Usually, there is no preferred growth direction for the tilted SRO lattice structure on the STO substrate since the STO has a cubic structure. However, DSO is also an orthorhombic structure and has the same symmetry group as SRO (Pbmn). Hence, the clamping effect of the DSO substrate can easily result in the formation of single-domain SRO thin films.

Interestingly, we observed that the light-induced deformation of SRO thin films was related to these lattice domains. Fig. 5a presents the Raman peak positions of the Ag phonon mode and the in-plane lattice variation of SRO films on the STO and DSO substrates at different intensities of laser illumination. SRO thin films on the STO (that is, multi-domain SRO) and DSO substrates (that is, single-domain SRO) show different Raman shifts at low excitation intensity that is caused by the different in-plane strain states. As the laser intensity increased, the redshift in the Raman spectra and the expansion of the SRO on the DSO substrate was larger than that of the SRO on the STO substrate. We hypothesize that the counteracting light-induced stress of multi-domain SRO diminishes the total amount of photo-induced deformation of SRO on the STO substrate (0.76%). Meanwhile, the maximum light-induced deformation of the single-domain SRO was measured as high as 1.12% on the DSO substrate. Note that photoexcitation of the substrates did not occur because the energy of the laser (2.33 eV) used in the Raman experiments was lower than the bandgap energy of STO (3.2 eV) and DSO (5.7 eV), and hence there was no possibility of photo-induced strain from these materials.

Figure 5: Photostriction and transient photoresistance of SrRuO3 thin films.

(a) The Raman frequency of the Ag phonon mode (filled symbols) and in-plane lattice variation (open symbols) as a function of excitation power intensity for single- and multi-domain SrRuO3 films (that is, grown on DyScO3 and SrTiO3 substrates, respectively). (b) The wavelength dependence of the photoresistive effect measured in SrRuO3 thin films on DyScO3 substrates as a function of time with fixed bias voltage (2 V) and excitation power intensity (1.0 × 105 W m−2). (c) The optical absorbance (orange line) and the photoresistance (blue circles) as a function of wavelength for the SrRuO3 thin films on DyScO3 substrates. (d) The transient photoresistance of SrRuO3 thin films on DyScO3 substrates measured at room temperature under 532 nm laser illumination (excitation power intensity was 1.0 × 105 W m−2). The vertical dashed lines indicate the 10 and 90% of the maximum photocurrent.

We can also evaluate the photostrictive behaviour of single- and multi-domain SRO by estimating the photostrictive efficiency at a fixed wavelength using equation (4):

where t is the phostrictive material thickness in the direction of illumination, λhv (= ΔL/L) is the light-induced deformation and I is the intensity of the light17. As we increased the excitation intensity of the 532 nm laser to 62.5 W cm−2, the photostrictive efficiency of single-domain SRO reached a maximum value of 7 × 10−16 m3 W−1 that was much higher than the values for nonpolar semiconductors (3.7 × 10−20 m3 W−1 for cyrstalline germanium and silicon)16, and also over 108 times greater than other metal oxides (for example, 5.2 × 10−26 m3 W−1 for PbTiO3 and 4 × 10−25 m3 W−1 for BFO)8,56. We attribute the high photostrictive efficiency of single-domain SRO to its strong optical–structural coupling effects.

Light-induced photoresistive effect in SRO

As photostriction causes variation in the lattice structure of SRO, it will also induce changes in the electrical resistance of the material. Therefore, in addition to studying light-induced deformation, we also investigated the light-induced photoresistive effect in SRO thin films on DSO substrates. The photoresistive effect can be defined as:

in which Rhv and Rdark are the resistances of SRO under illuminated and dark conditions, respectively57. We determined the wavelength-dependent photoresistance of SRO using different lasers at various wavelengths (325,405,532 and 780 nm). Note that the measurements of the SRO resistance were taken at room temperature and at a fixed laser intensity of 1.0 × 105 W m−2 for all wavelength conditions. The sheet resistance was 18.088 ohm sq−1 measured using a standard four-point-probe technique at room temperature. We observed that the change in photoresistance of the samples was fully reversible when the light source was switched between the ON and OFF states (Fig. 5b).

We also compared the photoresistance under different laser wavelengths. As shown in Fig. 5c, the photoresistance of SRO reached its maximum value of 2.4% under 532 nm illumination. The spectral absorption of SRO is also shown in Fig. 5c. We attributed the strong optical absorption-dependent photoresistance response of SRO to the illumination-induced excitation of electrons, consistent with previous observations of CoFe films deposited on BFO58. This finding implies that optical absorption is an important factor in determining the photoresistance of SRO. Further investigation is required to understand the correlation between the photoconductivity and photostriction of SRO as a function of wavelength.

As shown in Fig. 5d, the transition between the ON and OFF states revealed the response and recovery speeds of photoresistance in the SRO thin films. The rise and fall times under 532 nm illumination (defined as the time between 10 and 90% of the maximum photocurrent) were estimated to be 2.2 and 1.9 s, respectively. There was no obvious variation in the photoresistance response times at different incident wavelengths.

To rule out the effects of temperature on the photoresistance, we also measured the surface temperature of the SRO/DSO sample using a thermometer attached to the SRO film for 90 s during the illumination time period. As shown in Supplementary Fig. 5, the temperature increase caused by the laser was 1.58±0.15 °C. Meanwhile, the time response of the photoresistance of the material was much faster than the change in temperature. Therefore, we feel confident that the photostrictive effect of SRO is not due to thermal expansion by laser illumination.

As compared with the response/recovery speeds of organic polymers59,60, the SRO thin films demonstrate a fast photoresistance response that can be attributed to the ultrafast dynamics of electrons excited by light and direct electronic-excitation-induced strain in SRO55. We expect that the response speed can be further increased by doping57 that we are currently investigating.


In summary, we have demonstrated the controlled in-plane photostrictive effect of SRO at room temperature under visible-light illumination. In Raman scattering measurements, the Ag mode of the SRO thin film showed an increased redshift with laser intensity, indicating a change in the physical dimensions of the material caused by the tensile strain produced by photons. We attribute the underlying mechanism of the observed light-induced deformation to a strong nonequilibrium of phonons in SRO. The excellent light-induced deformation (1.12%) and photostrictive efficiency (7 × 10−16 m3 W−1) generated in single crystallographic domain SRO opens the possibility of utilizing this perovskite in future applications that combine mechanical and optical functionalities. We believe that photostrictive materials like SRO will be the breakthrough needed for the next generation of photostrictive actuators and optomechanical sensors.



We grew 40 nm thick (001)-oriented SRO thin films on (001) STO and DSO substrates by pulsed laser deposition equipped with in situ high-pressure reflection high energy electronic diffraction diagnostics. A KrF excimer laser (λ=248 nm) at a repetition rate of 10 Hz and fluence of 2.5 J cm−2 was used to ablate the SRO target. All the samples were grown at the same substrate temperature of 700 °C and a dynamic oxygen pressure of 100 mTorr. After growth, the samples were cooled to room temperature at a rate of 20 °C min−1 in oxygen at 1 atm.

Raman analysis

To study the photostrictive effects of SRO thin films, we carried out confocal Raman analysis using a Jobin-Yvon T64000 triple spectrometer system equipped with a liquid nitrogen cooled CCD (charge-coupled device) detector. The micro-Raman spectra were measured using a backscattering geometry and a polarized KTP laser (532 nm) (Coherent, Inc.) with a spot size of 40 μm2. A temperature-controlled stage was used to measure the spectra from 35 to 300 K. We used an optical filter to control the laser intensity from 7.5 to 125 W cm−2. The incident and scattered laser light propagated parallel to the c axis of SRO.

X-ray diffraction techniques

Structural details of the samples were confirmed by synchrotron-based X-ray diffraction at beamline BL-13A at the National Synchrotron Radiation Research Center in Hsinchu, Taiwan. The reciprocal space maps and radial scans were recorded in reciprocal lattice units that were normalized to the substrates (1 r.l.u.=2π/(aSTO or aDSO,pc)), in which the cell lattice parameters aSTO and aDSO,pc are 3.905 Å in the cubic form of STO and 3.950 Å in the pseudocubic form of DSO, respectively.

Photoresistance measurements

The photoresistance of the SRO thin films at various wavelengths (325,405,532 and 780 nm) was measured with a Keithley 4200-SCS semiconductor characterization system. This irradiation experiment was performed at room temperature using a He-Cd laser (325 nm), a GaN laser (405 nm), a KTP laser (532 nm) and a Tm:YAG laser (785 nm) (Coherent, Inc.). The measurements of the SRO resistance were taken at a fixed laser intensity of 1.0 × 105 W m−2 for all wavelength conditions.

HR-TEM image analysis

The crystallinity and atomic structures at the interfaces of the films were investigated using a JEOL-2010 HR-TEM (JEOL Co., Ltd) featuring a high resolution of 0.194 nm operated at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. The cross-sectional HR-TEM samples were prepared by a standard method, involving mechanical grinding, pre-thinning and a low-angle ion thinning process (Leica EM RES102, Leica Microsystems, Inc.).

Noncontact temperature measurements

The surface temperatures of the SRO thin films were measured with an InfReC Thermo Gear G100EXD thermal camera (Nippon Avionics Co., Ltd). The camera has 320 × 240 pixels and can take 30 frames s−1. It also has a resolution of 0.04 °C at 30 °C and can measure temperatures between −40 and 1,500 °C with an accuracy of ±2%. We measured the temperature of the SRO thin films under 532 nm laser illumination for 3 min using an excitation intensity that was the same as that for the Raman experiments in this study (125 W cm−2).

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Wei, T.-C. et al. Photostriction of strontium ruthenate. Nat. Commun. 8, 15108 doi: 10.1038/ncomms15108 (2017).

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1

    Wang, H. P. et al. Photon management in nanostructured solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. C 2, 3144–3171 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Carrette, L., Friedrich, K. A. & Stimming, U. Fuel cells–fundamentals and applications. Fuel Cells 1, 5–39 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Wang, Z. L. Towards self-powered nanosystems: from nanogenerators to nanopiezotronics. Adv. Funct. Mater. 18, 3553–3567 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Poosanaas, P., Tonooka, K. & Uchino, K. Photostrictive actuators. Mechatronics 10, 467–487 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Sun, D. C. & Tong, L. Y. Modeling of wireless remote shape control for beams using nonlinear photostrictive actuators. Int. J. Solids Struct. 44, 672–684 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Lafont, T. et al. Magnetostrictive–piezoelectric composite structures for energy harvesting. J. Micromech. Microeng. 22, 094009 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Datskos, P. G. et al. Chemical detection based on adsorption-induced and photoinduced stresses in microelectromechanical systems devices. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 19, 1173–1179 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Daranciang, D. et al. Ultrafast photovoltaic response in ferroelectric nanolayers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 087601 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Takagi, K. et al. Ferroelectric and photostrictive properties of fine-grained PLZT ceramics derived from mechanical alloying. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 87, 1477–1482 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Kundys, B. et al. Wavelength dependence of photoinduced deformation in BiFeO3 . Phys. Rev. B 85, 092301 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Finkelmann, H., Nishikawa, E., Pereira, G. G. & Warner, M. A. New opto-mechanical effect in solids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 015501 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Yu, Y., Nakano, M. & Ikeda, T. Photomechanics: directed bending of a polymer film by light. Nature 425, 145–145 (2003).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Buschert, J. R. & Colella, R. Photostriction effect in silicon observed by time-resolved x-ray diffraction. Solid State Commun. 80, 419–422 (1991).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Figielski, T. Photostriction effect in germanium. Phys. Status Solidi 1, 306–316 (1961).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Gauster, W. B. & Habing, D. H. Electronic volume effect in silicon. Phys. Rev. Lett. 18, 1058–1061 (1967).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Peng, C. Y. et al. Comprehensive study of the Raman shifts of strained silicon and germanium. J. Appl. Phys. 105, 083537 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Kundys, B. Photostrictive materials. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2, 011301 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Tatsuzak, I., Itoh, K., Ueda, S. & Shindo, Y. Strain along c axis of SbSI caused by illumination in dc electric field. Phys. Rev. Lett. 17, 198–200 (1966).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Ogasawara, T. et al. General features of photoinduced spin dynamics in ferromagnetic and ferrimagnetic compounds. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 087202 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Shih, H. Y. et al. Size-dependent photoelastic effect in ZnO nanorods. Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 021908 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Kundys, B., Viret, M., Colson, D. & Kundys, D. O. Light-induced size changes in BiFeO3 crystals. Nat. Mater. 9, 803–805 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Lee, S., Apgar, B. A. & Martin, L. W. Strong visible-light absorption and hot-carrier injection in TiO2/SrRuO3 heterostructures. Adv. Energy Mater. 3, 1084–1090 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Klein, L. et al. Perpendicular magnetic anisotropy and strong magneto‐optic properties of SrRuO3 epitaxial films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 66, 2427–2429 (1995).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Singh, A., Khan, Z. R., Vilarinho, P. M., Gupta, V. & Katiyar, R. S. Influence of thickness on optical and structural properties of BiFeO3 thin films: PLD grown. Mater. Res. Bull. 49, 531–536 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Maeno, Y. et al. Superconductivity in a layered perovskite without copper. Nature 372, 532–534 (1994).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Cava, R. J. et al. Superconductivity near 30 K without copper: the Ba0.6K0.4BiO3 perovskite. Nature 332, 814–816 (1988).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Saito, Y. et al. Lead-free piezoceramics. Nature 432, 84–87 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Guo, Y. P., Kakimoto, K. & Ohsato, H. Phase transitional behavior and piezoelectric properties of (Na0.5K0.5)NbO3–LiNbO3 ceramics. Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 4121–4123 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Park, K. I. et al. Piezoelectric BaTiO3 thin film nanogenerator on plastic substrates. Nano Lett. 10, 4939–4943 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Haertling, G. H. Ferroelectric ceramics: history and technology. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 82, 797–818 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Cohen, R. E. Origin of ferroelectricity in perovskite oxides. Nature 358, 136–138 (1992).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Shimizu, Y., Fukuyama, Y., Narikiyo, T., Arai, H. & Seiyama, T. Perovskite-type oxides having semiconductivity as oxygen sensors. Chem. Lett. 14, 377–380 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Okuda, T., Nakanishi, K., Miyasaka, S. & Tokura, Y. Large thermoelectric response of metallic perovskites: Sr1-xLaxTiO3(0 ≤ x ≤ 0.1). Phys. Rev. B 63, 113104 (2001).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Bocher, L. et al. CaMn1−xNbxO3 (x ≤ 0.08) perovskite-type phases as promising new high-temperature n-type thermoelectric materials. Inorg. Chem. 47, 8077–8085 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    He, J., Borisevich, A., Kalinin, S. V., Pennycook, S. J. & Pantelides, S. T. Control of octahedral tilts and magnetic properties of perovskite oxide heterostructures by substrate symmetry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 227203 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Vailionis, A. et al. Misfit strain accommodation in epitaxial ABO3 perovskites: lattice rotations and lattice modulations. Phys. Rev. B 83, 064101 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Lu, W. L. et al. Strain engineering of octahedral rotations and physical properties of SrRuO3 films. Sci. Rep. 5, 10245 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Zhou, W. P. et al. Electric field manipulation of magnetic and transport properties in SrRuO3/Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3-PbTiO3 heterostructure. Sci. Rep. 4, 6991 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Liu, H. J. et al. Epitaxial photostriction-magnetostriction coupled self-assembled nanostructures. ACS Nano 6, 6952–6959 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    Chen, C. L. et al. Epitaxial SrRuO3 thin films on (001) SrTiO3 . Appl. Phys. Lett. 71, 1047–1049 (1997).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41

    Singh, D. J. Electronic and magnetic properties of the 4d itinerant ferromagnet SrRuO3 . J. Appl. Phys. 79, 4818–4820 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42

    Sui, Z. & Herman, I. P. Effect of strain on phonons in Si, Ge, and Si/Ge heterostructures. Phys. Rev. B 48, 17938–17953 (1993).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43

    Kennedy, B. J., Hunter, B. A. & Hester, J. R. Synchrotron X ray diffraction reexamination of the sequence of high-temperature phases in SrRuO3 . Phys. Rev. B 65, 224103 (2002).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44

    Iliev, M. N. et al. Raman spectroscopy of SrRuO3 near the paramagnetic-to-ferromagnetic phase transition. Phys. Rev. B 59, 364–368 (1999).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45

    Lucazeau, G. Effect of pressure and temperature on Raman spectra of solids: anharmonicity. J. Raman Spectrosc. 34, 478–496 (2003).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46

    Herranz, G. et al. Domain structure of epitaxial SrRuO3 thin films. Phys. Rev. B 71, 174411 (2005).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47

    Sorianello, V., Colace, L., Nardone, M. & Assanto, G. Thermally evaporated single-crystal germanium on silicon. Thin Solid Films 519, 8037–8040 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48

    Schadler, L. S., Giannaris, S. C. & Ajayan, P. M. Load transfer in carbon nanotube epoxy composites. Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 3842–3844 (1998).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49

    Deluca, M. & Pezzotti, G. First-order transverse phonon deformation potentials of tetragonal perovskites. J. Phys. Chem. A 112, 11165–11171 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50

    Kiyama, T., Yoshimura, K., Kosuge, K., Ikeda, Y. & Bando, Y. Invar effect of SrRuO3: itinerant electron magnetism of Ru 4d electrons. Phys. Rev. B 54, R756–R759 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51

    Kirillov, D. et al. Phonon anomalies at the magnetic phase transition in SrRuO3 . Phys. Rev. B 51, 12825–12828 (1995).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52

    Liao, M. H., Kuo, P. S., Jan, S. R., Chang, S. T. & Liu, C. W. Strained Pt Schottky diodes on n-type Si and Ge. Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 143509 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53

    Antonakos, A., Palles, D., Liarokapis, E., Filippi, M. & Prellier, W. Evaluation of the strains in charge-ordered Pr1−xCaxMnO3 thin films using Raman spectroscopy. J. Appl. Phys. 104, 063508 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54

    Yang, D. S., Gedik, N. & Zewail, A. H. Ultrafast electron crystallography. 1. Nonequilibrium dynamics of nanometer-scale structures. J. Phys. Chem. C 111, 4889–4919 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55

    Schmising, C. V. et al. Ultrafast magnetostriction and phonon-mediated stress in a photoexcited ferromagnet. Phys. Rev. B 78, 060404 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56

    Schick, D. et al. Localized excited charge carriers generate ultrafast inhomogeneous strain in the multiferroic BiFeO3 . Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 097602 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57

    Kundys, B. et al. Light controlled magnetoresistance and magnetic field controlled photoresistance in CoFe film deposited on BiFeO3 . Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 262411 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58

    Jin, Z. M. et al. Strain modulated transient photostriction in La and Nb codoped multiferroic BiFeO3 thin films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 242902 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59

    Sánchez-Ferrer, A., Merekalov, A. & Finkelmann, H. Opto-mechanical effect in photoactive nematic side-chain liquid-crystalline elastomers. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 32, 671–678 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60

    Vanderve, G. & Prins, W. Photomechanical energy conversion in a polymer membrane. Nature 230, 70–72 (1971).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We are especially grateful to Ching-Cheng Chuang and Chia-Yen Lee from the Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Chiao Tung University, and Department of Electrical Engineering, National United University, for their contribution in the noncontact temperature measurements.

Author information




T.-C.W., H.-P.W. and J.-H.H. designed, directed the experiments and wrote this paper. T.-C.W. performed the Raman experiments, interpreted the results and wrote the manuscript. D.-S.T., J.-J.K. and C.-L.W. guided and assisted the experiments. H.-J.L. performed the X-ray diffraction characterization. Y.-P.Y. and Q.Z. performed the cross-sectional HR-TEM analysis. J.-H.H., Y.-H.C. and G.-R.L. supervised the project. All the authors read and commented on the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jr-Hau He.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures, Supplementary Notes and Supplementary References (PDF 995 kb)

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wei, T., Wang, H., Liu, H. et al. Photostriction of strontium ruthenate. Nat Commun 8, 15018 (2017).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.