Article | Open

Simultaneous loss of interlayer coherence and long-range magnetism in quasi-two-dimensional PdCrO2

  • Nature Communications 8, Article number: 15001 (2017)
  • doi:10.1038/ncomms15001
  • Download Citation
Published online:


In many layered metals, coherent propagation of electronic excitations is often confined to the highly conducting planes. While strong electron correlations and/or proximity to an ordered phase are believed to be the drivers of this electron confinement, it is still not known what triggers the loss of interlayer coherence in a number of layered systems with strong magnetic fluctuations, such as cuprates. Here, we show that a definitive signature of interlayer coherence in the metallic-layered triangular antiferromagnet PdCrO2 vanishes at the Néel transition temperature. Comparison with the relevant energy scales and with the isostructural non-magnetic PdCoO2 reveals that the interlayer incoherence is driven by the growth of short-range magnetic fluctuations. This establishes a connection between long-range order and interlayer coherence in PdCrO2 and suggests that in many other low-dimensional conductors, incoherent interlayer transport also arises from the strong interaction between the (tunnelling) electrons and fluctuations of some underlying order.


Many correlated metals, such as cuprates, ruthenates and iron-based superconductors have highly anisotropic electronic properties, often resulting in an interlayer conductivity that is incoherent, even at low temperatures. Despite intense theoretical and experimental investigation, the origin of this incoherence is unknown, though it is likely due to some combination of strong electron correlations, the lamellar crystalline structure and/or proximity to an ordered phase. In quasi-two-dimensional (Q2D) systems that are both metallic and magnetic, the (weak) electronic coupling between the conducting planes can also influence the interlayer exchange coupling J′. Although the effect of electronic coupling on the magnetic ordering—for example via the Ruderman–Kittel–Kasuya–Yosida (RKKY) interaction1,2,3,4—has been widely studied5,6, there has been very little experimental exploration of the effect of magnetism itself on the interlayer electronic coupling and on the electronic dimensionality.

PdCrO2 is a rare example of a highly metallic 2D triangular antiferromagnet. As shown in Fig. 1a, PdCrO2 has a delafossite structure, consisting of stacked layers of highly conducting Pd layers sandwiched between planes of Mott-insulating CrO2 (refs 7, 8). The Cr ions have a localized spin of 3/2 and are highly frustrated, forming a non-coplanar and non-collinear antiferromagnetic 120° helical structure at TN=37.5 K (refs 7, 9, 10, 11, 12). Quantum oscillation8,13 and angle-resolved photoemission studies14 have mapped out the Fermi surface (FS) of PdCrO2. At T>TN, the FS consists of a single six-fold symmetric electron pocket centered at Γ and is mostly derived from the 4d9 electrons15. At TN, band-folding due to the Cr3+ spin ordering leads to formation of a × supercell and results in FS reconstruction into the more complex FS, indicating a strong coupling between the magnetism and the conduction electrons. A recent magnetothermopower study also revealed a strong interaction between the 4d9 electrons and the short-range spin correlations persisting well above TN (ref. 10).

Figure 1: Magnetic ordering in PdCrO2.
Figure 1

(a) Crystal structure of PdCrO2, with lattice parameters a=b=2.930 Å and c=18.087 Å (ref. 7). The green, blue and red spheres represent the Pd, O and Cr atoms, respectively. The red-shaded planes represent the sides of the edge-shared CrO6 octahedra. (b) One of the possible solutions for magnetic structure of the antiferromagnetically ordered phase below TN=37.5 K, showing a non-coplanar spin structure9. The arrows represent the Cr spins, with arrows of the same color representing spins in the same spin sublattice group (see ref. 9 for details). For clarity only the Cr atoms are shown. (c) The temperature dependence of the interlayer c-axis resistivity ρc, which shows a sub-linear temperature dependence in the paramagnetic regime with a sharp cusp at TN, resulting in a ρc(T) that rises faster than T2 in the FS reconstructed phase. Inset: The derivative dρc/dT of the same resistivity curve, highlighting the sharp peak at the transition temperature. The shaded and unshaded regions indicate the coherent and incoherent regimes, respectively. Crystallographic drawings produced using VESTA37.

Here we report the observation that the interlayer coherence of the Pd electrons is lost upon transition from the magnetically ordered to the paramagnetic regime above TN. Through high-field angle-dependent magnetoresistance (ADMR) measurements at temperatures above and below TN, we chart the evolution of the so-called Hanasaki coherence peak—one of the most definitive and sensitive probes of electronic coherence16,17,18,19,20,21—as a function of temperature. We show that the coherence peak is fully suppressed just above TN, implying a close correlation between the magnetic order on the Cr sites and the coherence of the Pd electronic states. This finding raises the question of whether it is the interlayer electron coherence that renormalizes J′ and hence TN, or whether it is the melting of the magnetism that induces a dimensional crossover in the conduction electrons. We extract the interlayer hopping parameter from the Hanasaki peak, and through comparison with the isostructural non-magnetic PdCoO2, we argue that it is the loss of long-range magnetic order that ultimately decouples electronically the conducting planes.


Angle-dependent magnetoresistance

Figure 2b shows the c-axis magnetoresistance ρc(θ) of PdCrO2 at T=4.2 K in magnetic fields of 15 and 30 T as the sample is rotated around the polar axis, from the field perpendicular (θ=0°, H||[001]) to parallel (θ=90°, H||[110]) to the conduction planes. The data show a broad near-sinusoidal background with a minimum at θ=0° (the Lorentz force-free configuration), on which is superimposed a series of complex ADMR oscillations (AMROs). These peaks, also known as Yamaji oscillations, occur at certain orientations of the magnetic field whenever the interplane electron velocity, when averaged over its corresponding cyclotron orbit22, is minimized23. The angular location of these peaks is governed by the relation for each FS pocket, where n is an integer, d=6.03 Å is the interplanar distance and is the projection of the Fermi wave-number on the conducting plane23. While the multi-component nature of the FS in PdCrO2 leads to some ambiguity when assigning individual peaks to a specific pocket, some peaks can still be identified. As an example, the series of peaks indicated by arrows in Fig. 2b correspond to a pocket of radius (see inset of Fig. 2b), consistent with that of the γ pocket identified by Shubnikov–de Haas oscillations8,13. The presence of polar AMRO, however, is not by itself evidence for a fully coherent three-dimensional (3D) FS (ref. 17).

Figure 2: ADMR at high fields.
Figure 2

(a) Schematic diagram of the four-contact setup used to measure c-axis resistivity, showing the definition of the polar (θ) and azimuthal (φ) angles. (b) Evolution of ρc during a polar rotation at 15 T (red line) and 30 T (blue line), at 4.2 K. The direction of the applied field at 0° and 90° are given. The top right inset shows tan θ for the peaks indicated by the arrows, forming a straight line as expected for Yamaji oscillations. Fits (dashed line in the inset) to this give kf=0.57(3) Å−1, consistent with that found for the γ orbits from quantum oscillation measurements13. The left inset is a schematic showing the coherent FS orbits that are formed when the field is applied parallel to the crystal planes. (c,d) The reduction in the amplitude of the c-axis coherence peak at θ=90° as a function of temperature for PdCrO2 (μ0H=30 T) and for its non-magnetic isostructural analogue PdCoO2 (μ0H=35 T)28. For clarity, the PdCrO2 data is plotted as δρc=ρc(θ)−ρc(θ=0). The 4.2 K data for PdCrO2 have been scaled by 0.43. The PdCoO2 data are reproduced with kind permission from Kikugawa et al.28

Temperature dependence of the interlayer coherence peak

We turn now to the most dominant feature of the ADMR data, namely the sharp peak observed when the field is applied exactly parallel to the conducting planes (θ=90). This peak is unambiguously resolved at fields as low as 10 T (see Supplementary Fig. 2b), with the variation in field having no effect on the width of the peak, only its amplitude. First discussed in depth by Hanasaki et al.16, the peak arises due to formation of closed orbits parallel to the conducting planes in a warped FS column, as shown schematically in the inset of Fig. 2b (Note that although open orbits can also contribute to the interlayer conductivity for in-plane fields, they do not lead to a peak in the resistance19). Thus, in contrast to polar AMRO, the Hanasaki peak is a direct signature of interlayer coherence and implies the existence of a FS that extends in all three dimensions16,17,18,19,20,21,24.

Figure 2c shows the evolution of the Hanasaki peak as the temperature is raised through the magnetic transition. (It should be stressed that the magnetic field has a negligible effect on the value of TN, at least at the field strengths employed in this study8). With increasing temperature, the amplitude of the coherence peak gradually diminishes, until eventually, only the broad sinusoidal background is visible. In order to follow its evolution more closely, we plot in Fig. 3a the temperature dependence of dρK(θ)/dθ, where ρK(θ) is the Kohler-scaled resistivity ρc(θ)/ρc,0 with ρc,0 being the zero-field c-axis resistivity for that particular temperature. In this plot, a change in gradient from positive to negative at 90° indicates the presence of the coherence peak (as explained in the Supplementary Note 2, a near-sinusoidal background has been subtracted first from the raw data before differentiation). A change in gradient is indeed seen for all temperatures below TN, but not at 40, 42 or 44 K. The sharpness of the peak can be quantified by looking at the magnitude of the second-derivative of ρK(θ). This quantity, plotted in Fig. 3b, is found to decrease almost linearly with increasing temperature, reaching zero just above TN=37.5 K. In other words, the coherence peak is found to be fully suppressed above the magnetic ordering temperature, implying that the c-axis FS warping becomes ill-defined and the original 3D FS is transformed into a stack of 2D sheets (see insets of Fig. 3b).

Figure 3: Loss of electronic coherence at TN.
Figure 3

(a) Evolution of dρK/dθ as a function of the polar angle for a range of temperatures above and below TN. The 4.2 K curve is scaled by 0.03. (b) |d2ρK/dθ2| at θ=90°, showing the reduction in the sharpness of the coherence peak as temperature is increased. The shaded and unshaded backgrounds indicate the coherent and incoherent regimes, respectively. The temperature error bar is given by the temperature drift during the rotation, while the |d2ρK/dθ2| error bar is given by the maximum uncertainty introduced in the peak amplitude due to the necessary smoothing of the dρK/dθ curve. The error bars are not shown if they are smaller than the data points. In both figures the broad sinusoidal background was subtracted prior to differentiation, as described in the Supplementary Note 2. Inset: representation of a 3D FS in the coherent regime (c), and a Fermi surface that is only defined in two-dimensions in the incoherent regime (d).


The near-coincidence of the loss of the Hanasaki peak and TN raises the intriguing conundrum of whether it is the change in electronic coherence which determines the value of TN in PdCrO2, or conversely, if it is the loss of long-range order at TN that causes the interlayer hopping to become incoherent. In quasi-1D PrBa2Cu4O8, a field-induced reduction in the dimensionality of the chain carriers drives a spin–flop transition of the local moments on the Pr sites25. There, the persistence of the dimensional crossover beyond TN (ref. 26) confirms its key role in the spin–flop transition, the latter being attributed to a change in the effective RKKY interaction JRKKY induced by the corresponding reduction in of the mediating chain carriers. In PdCrO2, a similar renormalization of JRKKY (via ) could also act to destabilize the long-range order and thereby renormalize TN to a value far below the Curie–Weiss temperature ΘW.

To determine which is the dominant effect in PdCrO2, we need to compare first the energy scales that define the interlayer coherence. Interlayer conductivity is assumed to become incoherent once the interlayer hopping integral becomes less than other relevant energy scales, such as temperature kBT (in which case, the c-axis warping becomes ill-defined) or the intraplanar scattering rate ħ/τ (in which case, the individual carriers are scattered many times within the plane before tunnelling to an adjacent plane)17,27. The interlayer transfer integral can be obtained from the ADMR via the relation

where m* is the effective mass and Δθ is the full width of the coherence peak as measured from its base16. Before comparing the various energy scales in PdCrO2, we first consider the case of isostructural PdCoO2, which has an identical crystal structure and Fermiology to PdCrO2 (above ) but has a non-magnetic ground state. The temperature evolution of the Hanasaki coherence peak in PdCoO2 is shown in Fig. 2d (ref. 28). From its width, we obtain ≈17 meV=200 K, in good agreement with the value (=21 meV) obtained from a recent quantum oscillation study15. The coherence peak in PdCoO2 persists to temperatures of order 90 K, consistent with these estimates for . For PdCrO2, we find Δθ=8.0(5)°, and assuming that the coherence peak is dominated by the largest non-breakdown orbital (γ) for which kF=0.57(3) Å−1 and m*=1.37(2)me (ref. 13), we obtain ≈18(1) meV=210(20) K, that is, a very similar magnitude to that found in PdCoO2, as reflected in their comparable resistive anisotropies. Thus, despite the similarity in the magnitudes, the coherence peak in PdCrO2 vanishes at a significantly lower temperature.

We can also estimate ħ/τ just below from the magnitude of the in-plane resistivity and find ħ/τ(TN)≈0.8(1) meV (see Supplementary Note 3). Correspondingly, ωcτ≈3 at 30 T and 37.5 K. In the quasi-2D organic superconductor κ-(ET)2Cu(NCS)2, the coherence peak itself was found to survive down to ωcτ values of order 1 (ref. 24), while in the high-Tc cuprate Tl2Ba2CuO6+δ, polar AMRO have been observed down to (ref. 29). More concretely, it is instructive to compare directly the absolute magnitude of the resistivity in PdCrO2 and in PdCoO2 at the corresponding temperatures where the Hanasaki peak is found to vanish. Given that the carrier densities (and their effective masses 1.5me) are essentially identical above 37.5 K (refs 13, 15), the ratio of their resistivities should correspond to the ratio of their scattering rates. According to Hicks et al.13, the resistivity in PdCrO2 at TN is a factor of two larger than that of PdCoO2 at 90 K, implying that the ωcτ value in PdCrO2 when the Hanasaki peak vanishes is only half the corresponding value in PdCoO2. Consequently, the suppression of the Hanasaki peak does not appear to be correlated with the carrier lifetime reaching a certain threshold. Moreover, given that both kBT and ħ/τ are almost one order of magnitude smaller than at T=TN, there is no obvious reason a priori why the coherence peak in PdCrO2 should vanish beyond TN. Therefore we conclude that it is not the change in electronic coherence which determines the value of TN in PdCrO2, but that conversely, it is the loss of long-range magnetic order that induces the dimensional crossover of the conduction electrons and causes the interlayer hopping to become incoherent.

PdCrO2 is an anisotropic-layered antiferromagnet with an interlayer exchange interaction J′ that is much smaller than the in-plane interaction J. This leads to the existence of a broad temperature range above TN, TN<TW≈500 K within which short-range antiferromagnetic fluctuations persist7,9,11. Such a state can be described via self-consistent spin-wave theory30. Analysis of the corresponding equations (see equations (20–23) of ref. 30) shows that whereas the in-plane correlation length remains much larger than interatomic distance up to TW, the interplane correlation length ξc becomes comparable to the c-axis lattice spacing d at a much reduced temperature within TNW of the Néel ordering temperature,

Once ξc<d, the magnetic coupling becomes strongly fluctuating. For PdCrO2 the estimate of the right-hand side is <0.1. A relatively compact explicit expression can be found in the limit of classical spins (which only effects numerical factors of the order of one):

where κ=d/ξc. Note that this expression is meaningful only for κ<1, that is, very close to TN. The motion of electrons in an in-plane magnetic field becomes incoherent at an even smaller where rc is the cyclotron radius along the c axis. This implies that enhanced scattering of electrons off the spin fluctuations makes the interlayer electron motion incoherent even very close to the Néel temperature, that is, it is the magnetism that suppresses the electronic coherence at TTN and not vice versa. Importantly, short-range magnetic order within the plane survives until .

Our analysis follows from the Heisenberg model where exchange interactions are considered as fixed parameters. By including an RKKY-type interaction in the calculation, one might expect that the incoherence of electron motion along the c-axis should in turn lead to a reduction in the effective RKKY coupling and a decrease in J′, thereby amplifying the effect discussed above. However, the RKKY interaction itself does not appear to be the driving force for setting TN.

It will be interesting to explore whether a similar relationship between interlayer coherence and long-range order exists in other metallic antiferromagnets, such as AgNiO2 or NaxCoO2, where a highly anisotropic electronic state co-exists with frustrated local moment magnetism31,32. More generally, the present finding may also have important implications for our understanding of interlayer decoherence in a host of other low-dimensional systems such as underdoped cuprates, ruthenates, iridates or Fe-based superconductors where short-range spin and/or charge fluctuations proliferate over a wide range of their respective phase diagrams. Looking further ahead, it also raises the prospect of bespoke electronic dimensionally control via tuning of the magnetism, for example through a combination of conduction metal layers and coordination polymer magnets, whose J and J′ are highly tunable33,34.


Crystal synthesis and selection

Single crystals of PdCrO2 were grown using a flux method, as described in ref. 7. A number of samples were contacted for standard four-contact transport measurements along the c axis. To ensure optimal quality of the electrical contacts, DuPont 6838 conductive silver paste was used to contact the gold wires to the sample. The contacts were then cured in an Oxygen atmosphere. The evolution of the c-axis resistance ρc(T) upon cooling from 300 to 2 K was measured using a Cryogen Free Measurement System, see Supplementary Fig. 1. The highest quality sample, with a residual resistivity ratio ρc(300 K)/ρc(2 K) of 108 and dimensions of 0.6 × 0.6 × 0.2 mm3, was chosen for the ADMR measurements.

Angle-dependent magnetoresistance measurements

All measurements were carried out at the High Field Magnet Laboratory (HFML) in Nijmegen, NL, using a custom-built two-axis rotator which allows the sample to be rotated in-situ around the polar angle θ or the azimuthal axis φ individually. The two-axis rotator was used in one of the He4 flow-cryostats available at the HFML. The temperature is stabilized using the capacitance of a dielectric capacitor, which is known to have negligible field dependence above 4 K (refs 35, 36).

The sample was cooled in zero field at a rate of 0.5 K per min to prevent thermal shocks, and the c-axis resistivity was measured as the sample was rotated around the polar axis, from θ=0° (field normal to crystal planes) to θ=90° (field parallel to the the conduction planes) in a fixed field of 30 T. This measurement was repeated at a range of temperatures above and below the long-range magnetic ordering temperature TN=37.5 K, from 4.2 to 44 K. In addition, the field dependence was explored by performing polar rotations at fixed fields of 10–30 T in 5 T increments and at a temperature of 4.2 K.

Please see the Supplementary Note 1 for further details.

Data availability

All relevant data are available from S.G. and N.E.H.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Ghannadzadeh, S. et al. Simultaneous loss of interlayer coherence and long-range magnetism in quasi-two-dimensional PdCrO2. Nat. Commun. 8, 15001 doi: 10.1038/ncomms15001 (2017).

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1.

    & Indirect exchange coupling of nuclear magnetic moments by conduction electrons. Phys. Rev. 96, 99–102 (1954).

  2. 2.

    Magnetic properties of Cu-Mn alloys. Phys. Rev. 106, 893–898 (1957).

  3. 3.

    A theory of metallic ferro- and antiferromagnetism on Zener’s model. Prog. Theor. Phys. 16, 45–57 (1956).

  4. 4.

    Indirect RKKY interaction in any dimensionality. Phys. Rev. B 55, 8064–8066 (1997).

  5. 5.

    , & Magnetism of Ce(Pd1−xMx)2Al3 (M=Ag, Cu) based on RKKY interaction. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 80, SA128 (2011).

  6. 6.

    et al. Pd magnetism induced by indirect interlayer exchange coupling. Phys. Rev. B 86, 144403 (2012).

  7. 7.

    , , & Critical behavior of the metallic triangular-lattice Heisenberg antiferromagnet PdCrO2. Phys. Rev. B 79, 104424 (2009).

  8. 8.

    et al. Quantum oscillations of the metallic triangular-lattice antiferromagnet PdCrO2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 176405 (2013).

  9. 9.

    et al. Magnetic structure of the conductive triangular-lattice antiferromagnet PdCrO2. Phys. Rev. B 89, 104408 (2014).

  10. 10.

    et al. Anomalous magnetothermopower in a metallic frustrated antiferromagnet. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 087202 (2016).

  11. 11.

    , , , & Magnetic structure of antiferromagnetic PdCrO2 possible degenerate helices on a rhombohedral lattice. Phys. B 213–214, 221–223 (1995).

  12. 12.

    , , , & On magnetic properties of some oxides with delafossite-type structure. Mater. Res. Bull. 21, 745–752 (1986).

  13. 13.

    et al. Quantum oscillations and magnetic reconstruction in the delafossite PdCrO2. Phys. Rev. B 92, 014425 (2015).

  14. 14.

    et al. Direct observation of localized spin antiferromagnetic transition in PdCrO2 by angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy. Sci. Rep. 4, 3680 (2014).

  15. 15.

    et al. Quantum oscillations and high carrier mobility in the delafossite PdCoO2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 116401 (2012).

  16. 16.

    , , , & Contribution of small closed orbits to magnetoresistance in quasi-two-dimensional conductors. Phys. Rev. B 57, 1336–1339 (1998).

  17. 17.

    & Incoherent interlayer transport and angular-dependent magnetoresistance oscillations in layered metals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 4492–4495 (1998).

  18. 18.

    & Comment on ‘Contribution of small closed orbits to magnetoresistance in quasi-two-dimensional conductors’. Phys. Rev. B 60, 11207–11209 (1999).

  19. 19.

    , , , & Reply to ‘Comment on ‘Contribution of small closed orbits to magnetoresistance in quasi-two-dimensional conductors’’. Phys. Rev. B 60, 11210–11211 (1999).

  20. 20.

    Studies of quasi-two-dimensional organic conductors based on BEDT-TTF using high magnetic fields. Rep. Prog. Phys. 63, 1111 (2000).

  21. 21.

    et al. Test for interlayer coherence in a quasi-two-dimensional superconductor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 037001 (2002).

  22. 22.

    The kinetic formulation of conduction problems. Proc. Phys. Soc. A 65, 458 (1952).

  23. 23.

    On the angle dependence of the magnetoresistance in quasi-two-dimensional organic superconductors. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 58, 1520–1523 (1989).

  24. 24.

    et al. Persistence to high temperatures of interlayer coherence in an organic superconductor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 027004 (2007).

  25. 25.

    et al. Dimensionality-driven spin-flop transition in quasi-one-dimensional PrBa2Cu4O8. Phys. Rev. B 81, 224435 (2010).

  26. 26.

    et al. Three-dimensional fermi-liquid ground state in the quasi-one-dimensional cuprate PrBa2Cu4O8. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 086601 (2002).

  27. 27.

    & Temperature dependence of the c-axis resistivity of high-Tc layered oxides. Phys. Rev. B 45, 5001–5004 (1992).

  28. 28.

    et al. Interplanar coupling-dependent magnetoresistivity in high-purity layered metals. Nat. Commun. 7, 10903 (2016).

  29. 29.

    , , , & Tracking anisotropic scattering in overdoped Tl2Ba2CuO6+δ above 100 k. New J. Phys. 11, 055057 (2009).

  30. 30.

    , & Self-consistent spin-wave theory of layered Heisenberg magnets. Phys. Rev. B 60, 1082–1099 (1999).

  31. 31.

    et al. Cascade of field-induced magnetic transitions in a frustrated antiferromagnetic metal. Phys. Rev. B 90, 020401 (2014).

  32. 32.

    et al. Coherence-incoherence and dimensional crossover in layered strongly correlated metals. Nature 417, 627–630 (2002).

  33. 33.

    et al. Experimentally determining the exchange parameters of quasi-two-dimensional Heisenberg magnets. New. J. Phys. 10, 083025 (2008).

  34. 34.

    et al. Evolution of magnetic interactions in a pressure-induced Jahn-Teller driven magnetic dimensionality switch. Phys. Rev. B 87, 241102 (2013).

  35. 35.

    A low temperature glass-ceramic capacitance thermometer. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 42, 561–566 (1971).

  36. 36.

    , & Magnetic field dependence of a capacitance temperature sensor. J. Low Temp. Phys. 147, 517–524 (2007).

  37. 37.

    & VESTA 3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 44, 1272–1276 (2011).

Download references


We gratefully acknowledge illuminating discussions with A.P. Mackenzie and N. Shannon, and N. Kikugawa for allowing us to reproduce the PdCoO2 data. We also acknowledge the support of HFML-EMFL, a member of the European Magnetic Field Laboratory (EMFL). This work is part of the research program of the Foundation for Fundamental Research on Matter (FOM), which is part of the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO).

Author information


  1. High Field Magnet Laboratory (HFML-EMFL), Faculty of Science, Radboud University, Toernooiveld 7, 6525ED Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    • S. Ghannadzadeh
    • , S. Licciardello
    • , S. Arsenijević
    • , P. Robinson
    •  & N. E. Hussey
  2. Institute of Molecules and Materials, Faculty of Science, Radboud University, 6525 AJ Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    • S. Ghannadzadeh
    • , S. Licciardello
    • , S. Arsenijević
    • , P. Robinson
    • , M. I. Katsnelson
    •  & N. E. Hussey
  3. Oxford Instruments NanoScience, Tubney Woods, Abingdon, Oxfordshire OX13 5QX, UK

    • S. Ghannadzadeh
  4. Dresden High Magnetic Field Laboratory (HLD-EMFL), Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01328 Dresden, Germany

    • S. Arsenijević
  5. Department of Physics, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo 192-0397, Japan

    • H. Takatsu
  6. Department of Energy and Hydrocarbon Chemistry, Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University, Kyoto 615-8510, Japan

    • H. Takatsu


  1. Search for S. Ghannadzadeh in:

  2. Search for S. Licciardello in:

  3. Search for S. Arsenijević in:

  4. Search for P. Robinson in:

  5. Search for H. Takatsu in:

  6. Search for M. I. Katsnelson in:

  7. Search for N. E. Hussey in:


S.G. and N.E.H. initiated the project. S.G., S.L., S.A. and P.R. performed the measurements, H.T. grew the high-quality crystals, S.G., M.I.K. and N.E.H. analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript, with input from all the other authors.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to S. Ghannadzadeh or N. E. Hussey.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Figures, Supplementary Notes and Supplementary References

  2. 2.

    Peer Review File


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Creative Commons BYThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit