## Abstract

A quantum spin liquid is a state of matter characterized by quantum entanglement and the absence of any broken symmetry. In condensed matter, the frustrated rare-earth pyrochlore magnets Ho_{2}Ti_{2}O_{7} and Dy_{2}Ti_{2}O_{7}, so-called spin ices, exhibit a classical spin liquid state with fractionalized thermal excitations (magnetic monopoles). Evidence for a quantum spin ice, in which the magnetic monopoles become long range entangled and an emergent quantum electrodynamics arises, seems within reach. The magnetic properties of the quantum spin ice candidate Yb_{2}Ti_{2}O_{7} have eluded a global understanding and even the presence or absence of static magnetic order at low temperatures is controversial. Here we show that sensitivity to pressure is the missing key to the low temperature behaviour of Yb_{2}Ti_{2}O_{7}. By combining neutron diffraction and muon spin relaxation on a stoichiometric sample under pressure, we evidence a magnetic transition from a disordered, non-magnetic, ground state to a splayed ferromagnetic ground state.

## Introduction

The pyrochlore lattice, comprised of corner-sharing tetrahedra, is the archetype of magnetic frustration in three dimensions^{1} (Fig. 1). Since its early study by Anderson in 1956 (ref. 2), frustrated spin Hamiltonians on the pyrochlore lattice have provided a seemingly inexhaustible source for the study of fundamental physics^{3,4}. In particular, spin liquid ground states have been predicted for such a lattice decorated with Heisenberg^{5,6} or XXZ^{7} spins. More recently, pyrochlore magnets have been put forward as realistic vehicles for the realization of a quantum spin ice state, using the generic *S*= nearest-neighbour anisotropic exchange Hamiltonian^{8,9,10}. Yb_{2}Ti_{2}O_{7} is a promising quantum spin ice candidate as it possesses both an (effective) *S*= spin, thanks to the well isolated crystal field Kramers doublet ground state appropriate to Yb^{3+}^{11}, and strong quantum fluctuations brought by anisotropic exchange interactions and an XY *g*-tensor^{12}. Several studies have focused on the nature of the ground state in Yb_{2}Ti_{2}O_{7}, yet a consensus has been elusive to date^{13,14,15,16,17,18}. Early neutron scattering experiments ruled out the presence of conventional static order down to 90 mK in a polycrystalline sample^{15}, whereas other single crystal studies concluded the ground state was ferromagnetic^{14,16}. The results of local probes are even more puzzling. Muon spin relaxation (μSR) measurements evidenced the presence of true static moments on the muon timescale, through the observation of both a drop of asymmetry and a decoupling of the muon spins in longitudinal applied fields^{18}, along with a drastic slowing down of the fluctuation rate below *T*_{c} for certain samples^{13}. In contrast, μSR studies by D’Ortenzio *et al*.^{17} found a non-magnetic, fluctuating ground state, in both stoichiometric polycrystalline and single crystal samples, *despite* the presence of pronounced specific heat anomalies at *T*_{c}=265 mK and *T*_{c}=185 mK, respectively. It is clear that local defects, either oxygen vacancies^{19} or excess magnetic ions^{20} (referred to as stuffing), vary significantly between polycrystalline powders and single crystals, and are likely responsible for such sample dependencies.

Here, by applying hydrostatic pressure to well-characterized Yb_{2+x}Ti_{2−x}O_{7+δ} samples, with *x*=0 and *x*=0.046 (ref. 20), we observe a magnetic transition in the stoichiometric, *x*=0 sample from a disordered ground state into a splayed ferromagnetic ground state. This result sheds light on the origin of the sample dependence in the ground state selection for Yb_{2}Ti_{2}O_{7} and is consistent with the recent theoretical proposal that Yb_{2}Ti_{2}O_{7} lies close to a phase boundary in the generic quantum spin ice Hamiltonian phase diagram^{21}.

## Results

### Muon spin relaxation

μSR measurements under hydrostatic pressures as high as 25 kbar, and at temperatures as low as 0.245 K, were performed on Yb_{2+x}Ti_{2−x}O_{7+δ} samples, with *x*=0 and *x*=0.046, at the GPD beamline of PSI. The muons are implanted inside the bulk of the material, and act as local magnetic probes. The signal coming from the muons that stop inside the pressure cell was measured separately and subtracted (see Supplementary Figs 1 and 2) from the overall signal.

Figure 2a shows the temperature dependence of the μSR signal for the stoichiometric, *x*=0 sample in zero field, *R*_{zf}(*t*), as a function of time *t* and under an applied pressure *P*=19.7 kbar. Well above *T*_{c}=0.265 K, at *T*≥0.97 K, the majority of the Yb^{3+} magnetic moments are paramagnetic and in a fast fluctuating regime, and display single-exponential relaxation. For *T*≤0.5 K, we observe the development of a small magnetic fraction *f* of the Yb^{3+} moments, which grows nonlinearly as the temperature decreases. The absence of oscillations at short time is indicative of a highly disordered magnetic state. The zero-field relaxation is well described by a Gaussian distribution of static internal fields with standard deviation Δ (see Supplementary Note 1), and the following phenomenological function:

In a purely static scenario, the second term (1/3-tail) should be constant. Here, a fluctuating component is nonetheless observed and we modelled this using a relaxation rate *λ*. The third term accounts for the paramagnetic component, and assumes the same relaxation rate *λ*, for simplicity. The unconventional shape of the zero-field longitudinal relaxation was discussed in detail in refs 13, 22. In contrast, the evolution of the relaxation in temperature of the *x*=0 sample under zero applied pressure, shown in Fig. 2b, shows little or no magnetic fraction (*f*≃6%) at any temperature above our base *T*=0.245 K, in agreement with D’Ortenzio *et al*.^{17} previously reported μSR studies. Using equation (1) we extract the magnetic fraction for each pressure and temperature, and collect the results in Fig. 2c. The development of the magnetic fraction with temperature is clearly pressure dependent, and turns on strongly at low temperatures, below *T*_{c}=0.265 K, for our minimum pressure of 1.2 kbar. For each pressure, one can define a critical temperature *T*_{c}, such that for *T*≤*T*_{c}, 50% of the magnetic moments are frozen. The corresponding *P*−*T* phase diagram is shown in Fig. 3. Clearly, the phase transition extrapolated from finite pressure measurements to zero pressure agrees well with the sharp *C*_{p} anomaly at *T*_{c}=0.265 K, appropriate to the *x*=0 sample. However the zero-pressure state for the *x*=0 sample at 0.245 K, below *T*_{c}, is disordered, indicating that the ground state of the stoichiometric, *x*=0 sample, is a spin liquid.

We now turn to the *x*=0.046 sample. The zero-field relaxation at *T*=0.245 K under zero and an applied pressure *P*=24.1 kbar are shown in Fig. 2d. Strikingly, no frozen magnetic fraction is observed upon the application of a pressure as high as *P*=24.1 kbar. Instead, we observe an increase of the relaxation for this *x*=0.046 sample, demonstrating its sensitivity to pressure. The temperature dependence of the relaxation is reported in Fig. 2e,f. One can speculate that a transition to a fully ordered state, as it is observed for the *x*=0 sample, would require higher pressures or lower temperatures, consistent with the lower *T*_{c}=0.185 K of the *x*=0.046 sample.

μSR studies on other samples have reported a drastic slowing down of spin fluctuations^{13}, or static order^{18}, under zero applied pressure for temperatures below 0.25 K. In the light of our results, even relatively low (applied or chemical) pressure can destroy the disordered spin liquid state and induce magnetic order. A low level of defects in the different samples is a natural explanation to the contradictory μSR results. Such disorder, at the ∼2% level, is difficult to characterize, but it is largely absent in polycrystalline samples, synthesized at lower temperatures by solid state methods.

### Neutron diffraction

Armed with the knowledge of the *P*−*T* phase diagram in Fig. 3, we sought to determine the nature of the pressure-induced magnetic order in Yb_{2+x}Ti_{2−x}O_{7+δ} samples, with *x*=0, by performing neutron diffraction on the stoichiometric powder sample at the D20 high-flux diffractometer of the ILL. The detection of small magnetic moments under pressure using neutron diffraction is challenging due to the significant background signal of the pressure cell itself. Figure 4a shows the neutron diffraction data for the maximum hydrostatic pressure of the cell, *P*=11(2) kbar, and temperatures from 400 to 100 mK, from which a background measured at 800 mK was subtracted. We clearly observe the development of magnetic Bragg intensities at the (111), (311), (222) and (004) positions upon cooling below 400 mK. This is firm evidence for the existence of long-range magnetic order in Yb_{2+x}Ti_{2−x}O_{7+δ} samples, with *x*=0, under an applied pressure *P*=11(2) kbar. The refinement of the neutron diffraction data gives us the temperature dependence of the ordered moment, shown in Fig. 4b. The contrast with previous experiments under zero pressure is striking. First, the saturated moment *μ*=0.33(5) *μ*_{B} is much smaller than that *μ*∼1 *μ*_{B} reported previously for different Yb_{2}Ti_{2}O_{7} samples^{16}, although similar to the ordered moment in the Γ_{5} ordered state of Yb_{2}Ge_{2}O_{7} (ref. 23). Second, the ordered moment vanishes cleanly above *T*_{c}∼0.4 K, with no anomalous magnetic Bragg intensity well above *T*_{c} (refs 24, 25). The previously reported order parameter at *P*=0 of our *x*=0 polycrystalline sample is anomalous^{24}; it shows no change across *T*_{c} and only falls off at much higher temperatures. Consistency with our *P*=0 μSR results on the same sample requires that this Bragg-like scattering is dynamic on slow time scales. That notwithstanding, the magnetic structure previously refined on the basis of a very high temperature (∼8 K) background subtraction gave a splayed ice-like ferromagnetic structure^{24}, with the moments on a tetrahedron lying mainly in the [100] direction with a positive splay angle *θ*=14(5)°, such that the moments tilt towards the local [111] direction (Fig. 4c). The components perpendicular to the local [111] axis obey the 2-in/2-out ice rule on a single tetrahedron. A different type of splayed ferromagnet, with the perpendicular components satisfying the all-in/all-out structure, has also been reported recently^{26}, in addition to a nearly collinear ferromagnet (*θ*∼0°)^{16}, for other samples. The magnetic structure associated with the true Bragg scattering we refine here in the stoichiometric *x*=0 sample under *P*=11(2) kbar is also a splayed ice-like structure, but with a much reduced splay angle *θ*=5(4)°, such that it is close to a collinear [100] ferromagnet (Fig. 4d).

## Discussion

These results bring a fresh perspective on the long standing debate about the presence or absence of static magnetic order in the quantum pyrochlore magnet Yb_{2+x}Ti_{2−x}O_{7+δ}. The acute sensitivity to local (through the Yb^{3+} stuffing) or applied pressure is surprising. However, a corollary of our new *P*−*T* phase diagram is that non-stoichiometric samples with non-zero chemical pressure can easily display an ambient applied pressure phase transition to a splayed ferromagnetic state at *T*_{c}. Yet, this interpretation remains challenged by the fact that our *x*=0.046 sample does not show evidence for magnetic order at ambient pressure, and by previous reported observations of a magnetic transition in polycrystalline, likely *x*∼0, sample even under zero pressure^{13,18}. This may indicate that the non-magnetic low-temperature region of the phase diagram is extremely narrow, existing only for a certain range of *x*, whose absolute values are still to be determined. This would actually be reminiscent of the recent findings on the Tb_{2+x}Ti_{2−x}O_{7+δ} pyrochlore magnet, which has been shown to display an ordered phase that is extremely sensitive to disorder, appearing only for 0<*x*<0.01 (refs 27, 28, 29).

Furthermore, the present work illustrates the relevance of applying hydrostatic pressure to tune the magnetic properties of frustrated pyrochlore compounds, a path that was followed by pioneering work on the other spin liquid candidate Tb_{2}Ti_{2}O_{7} (ref. 30). In case of Yb_{2}Ti_{2}O_{7}, we found that the pressure tunes the delicate balance between the anisotropic exchanges of the quantum spin ice Hamiltonian, and selects a splayed ferromagnetic ground state away from the degenerate antiferromagnetic ground states manifold. This scenario confirms recent theoretical proposals that Yb_{2}Ti_{2}O_{7} lies close to phase boundaries derived from the generic *S*_{eff}= quantum spin ice Hamiltonian^{21}, and provides the missing key to understand its exotic magnetic properties. Particularly appealing is the prediction that accidental degeneracies in the vicinity of these phase boundaries can lead to the emergence of a quantum spin liquid^{31}. This would offer a natural explanation for a non-magnetic, disordered state under zero pressure in stoichiometric Yb_{2}Ti_{2}O_{7} and recent observations of a continuum of gapless quantum excitations^{24,32} at low temperatures.

## Methods

### Sample preparation

The Yb_{2+x}Ti_{2−x}O_{7+δ} samples with *x*=0 and *x*=0.046 were prepared at the Brockhouse Institute for Materials Research, McMaster University. The *x*=0 powder sample was obtained through conventional solid-state reaction between pressed powders of Yb_{2}O_{3} and TiO_{2} sintered at 1,200 °C in air. The *x*=0.046 powder sample was obtained by crushing a single crystal grown by the floating zone method in 4 atm of O_{2} with a growth rate of 5 mm h^{−1}. More details on the details of the synthesis and the characterization can be found in ref. 25.

### Muon spin relaxation

μSR measurements were carried out at the GPD instrument of the Paul Scherrer Institut, Switzerland. About 1 g of each powder sample was mixed with ∼3 mm^{3} of a pressure medium (Daphne 7373 oil) and placed inside the sample channel of a double-wall pressure cell. Two different cells were used, labelled as (1) and (2) (see Supplementary Note 1), and are described in more details in ref. 33. The muon momentum was adjusted in order to obtain an optimal fraction of the muons stopping in the sample, with optimal values found at *P*=106 and *P*=107 MeV *c*^{−1}. The relaxation of both cells were measured without any sample down to 0.245 K. The applied pressure was determined by measuring the superconducting transition temperature of a small piece of pure indium inserted in the sample channel^{33}.

### Neutron diffraction

The neutron diffraction experiment was conducted at the D20 beamline, a high intensity two axis diffractometer, at the Institut Laue-Langevin, using a neutron wavelength *λ*=2.4 Å. A mass of 1.5 g of Yb_{2}Ti_{2}O_{7} powder sample and a small amount of NaCl powder, which serves as a pressure calibration, were both mounted in a high pressure clamp cell and inserted in a ^{3}He–^{4}He dilution fridge. Fluorinert was used as a pressure transmitter. A minimum of 12 h of data was collected at each temperature. The diffraction pattern obtained for *T*=800 mK is shown in Supplementary Fig. 3. Structural refinements for both NaCl and Yb_{2}Ti_{2}O_{7} and magnetic refinements for Yb_{2}Ti_{2}O_{7} have been performed using the Fullprof program suite^{34}.

### Data availability

The data sets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

## Authors contributions

E.K., J.G. and B.D.G. wrote the manuscript. E.K., J.G., K.F. and B.D.G. performed the neutron diffraction experiment. E.K. and B.D.G. performed the μSR experiment. K.A.R. and H.A.D. synthesized and characterized the samples. C.R. designed and performed the neutron scattering experiment. Z.G. and R.K. designed and performed the μSR experiment. All the co-authors discussed the results and improved the manuscript.

## Additional information

**How to cite this article:** Kermarrec, E. *et al*. Ground state selection under pressure in the quantum pyrochlore magnet Yb_{2}Ti_{2}O_{7}. *Nat. Commun.* **8,** 14810 doi: 10.1038/ncomms14810 (2017).

**Publisher’s note**: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## References

- 1.
Lacroix, C., Mendels, P. & Mila, F.

*Introduction to Frustrated Magnetism*Springer (2011). - 2.
Anderson, P. W. Ordering and antiferromagnetism in ferrites.

*Phys. Rev.***102**, 1008 (1956). - 3.
Bramwell, S. T. & Gingras, M. J. P. Spin ice state in frustrated magnetic pyrochlore materials.

*Science***294**, 1495–1501 (2001). - 4.
Fennell, T.

*et al.*Magnetic Coulomb phase in the spin ice Ho_{2}Ti_{2}O_{2}.*Science***326**, 415–417 (2009). - 5.
Moessner, R. & Chalker, J. T. Properties of a classical spin liquid: the Heisenberg pyrochlore antiferromagnet.

*Phys. Rev. Lett.***80**, 2929–2932 (1998). - 6.
Canals, B. & Lacroix, C. Pyrochlore antiferromagnet: a three-dimensional quantum spin liquid.

*Phys. Rev. Lett.***80**, 2933–2936 (1998). - 7.
Hermele, M., Fisher, M. P. A. & Balents, L. Pyrochlore photons: the U(1) spin liquid in a three-dimensional frustrated magnet.

*Phys. Rev. B***69**, 064404 (2004). - 8.
Savary, L. & Balents, L. Coulombic quantum liquids in spin-1/2 pyrochlores.

*Phys. Rev. Lett.***108**, 037202 (2012). - 9.
Benton, O., Sikora, O. & Shannon, N. Seeing the light: experimental signatures of emergent electromagnetism in a quantum spin ice.

*Phys. Rev. B***86**, 075154 (2004). - 10.
Gingras, M. J. P. & McClarty, P. A. Quantum spin ice: a search for gapless quantum spin liquids in pyrochlore magnets.

*Rep. Prog. Phys***77**, 056501 (2014). - 11.
Gaudet, J.

*et al.*Neutron spectroscopic study of crystalline electric field excitations in stoichiometric and lightly stuffed Yb_{2}Ti_{2}O_{7}.*Phys. Rev. B***92**, 134420 (2015). - 12.
Ross, K., Savary, L., Gaulin, B. D. & Balents, L. Quantum excitations in quantum spin ice.

*Phys. Rev. X***1**, 021002 (2011). - 13.
Hodges, J. A.

*et al.*First-order transition in the spin dynamics of geometrically frustrated Yb_{2}Ti_{2}O_{7}.*Phys. Rev. Lett.***88**, 077204 (2002). - 14.
Yasui, Y.

*et al.*Ferromagnetic transition of pyrochlore compound Yb_{2}Ti_{2}O_{7}.*J. Phys. Soc. Jpn***72**, 3014–3015 (2003). - 15.
Gardner, J. S., Ehlers, G., Rosov, N., Erwin, R. W. & Petrovic, C. Spin-spin correlations in Yb

_{2}Ti_{2}O_{7}: a polarized neutron scattering study.*Phys. Rev. B***70**, 180404 (2004). - 16.
Chang, L.-J.

*et al.*Higgs transition from a magnetic Coulomb liquid to a ferromagnet in Yb_{2}Ti_{2}O_{7}.*Nat. Commun.***3**, 992 (2012). - 17.
D’Ortenzio, R. M.

*et al.*Unconventional magnetic ground state in Yb_{2}Ti_{2}O_{7}.*Phys. Rev. B***88**, 134428 (2013). - 18.
Chang, L.-J.

*et al.*Static magnetic moments revealed by muon spin relaxation and thermodynamic measurements in the quantum spin ice Yb_{2}Ti_{2}O_{7}.*Phys. Rev. B***89**, 184416 (2014). - 19.
Sala, G.

*et al.*Vacancy defects and monopole dynamics in oxygen-deficient pyrochlores.*Nat. Mater.***13**, 488–493 (2014). - 20.
Ross, K. A.

*et al.*Lightly stuffed pyrochlore structure of single-crystalline Yb_{2}Ti_{2}O_{7}grown by the optical floating zone technique.*Phys. Rev. B***86**, 174424 (2012). - 21.
Jaubert, L. D. C.

*et al.*Are multiphase competition and order by disorder the keys to understanding Yb_{2}Ti_{2}O_{7}.*Phys. Rev. Lett.***115**, 267208 (2015). - 22.
Yaouanc, A., Maisuradze, A. & Dalmas de Réotier, P. Influence of short-range spin correlations on the μSR polarization functions in the slow dynamic limit: application to the quantum spin-liquid system Yb

_{2}Ti_{2}O_{7}.*Phys. Rev. B***87**, 134405 (2013). - 23.
Hallas, A. M.

*et al.*XY antiferromagnetic ground state in the effective*S*=1/2 pyrochlore Yb_{2}Ge_{2}O_{7}.*Phys. Rev. B***93**, 104405 (2016). - 24.
Gaudet, J.

*et al.*Gapless quantum excitations from an icelike splayed ferromagnetic ground state in stoichiometric Yb_{2}Ti_{2}O_{7}.*Phys. Rev. B***93**, 064406 (2016). - 25.
Ross, K. A.

*et al.*Dimensional evolution of spin correlations in the magnetic pyrochlore Yb_{2}Ti_{2}O_{7}.*Phys. Rev. B***84**, 174442 (2011). - 26.
Yaouanc, A., Dalmas de Réotier, P., Keller, L., Roessli, B. & Forget, A. A novel type of splayed ferromagnetic order observed in Yb

_{2}Ti_{2}O_{7}.*J. Phys. Condens. Matter***28**, 426002 (2016). - 27.
Taniguchi, T.

*et al.*Long-range order and spin-liquid states of polycrystalline Tb_{2+x}Ti_{2x}O_{7+y}.*Phys. Rev. B***87**, 060408(R) (2013). - 28.
Kermarrec, E.

*et al.*Gapped and gapless short-range-ordered magnetic states with (1/2, 1/2, 1/2) wave vectors in the pyrochlore magnet Tb_{2+x}Ti_{2x}O_{7+δ}.*Phys. Rev. B***92**, 245114 (2015). - 29.
Takatsu, H.

*et al.*Quadrupole order in the frustrated pyrochlore Tb_{2+x}Ti_{2x}O_{7+y}.*Phys. Rev. Lett.***116**, 217201 (2016). - 30.
Mirebeau, I.

*et al.*Pressure-induced crystallization of a spin liquid.*Nature***420**, 54–57 (2002). - 31.
Yan, H., Benton, O., Jaubert, L. D. C. & Shannon, N. Living on the edge: ground-state selection in quantum spin-ice pyrochlores. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1311.3501 (2013).

- 32.
Robert, J.

*et al.*Spin dynamics in the presence of competing ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic correlations in Yb_{2}Ti_{2}O_{7}.*Phys. Rev. B***92**, 064425 (2015). - 33.
Khasanov, R.

*et al.*High pressure research using muons at the Paul Scherrer Institute.*High Press. Res.***36**, 140–166 (2016). - 34.
Rodriguez-Carvajal, J. Recent advances in magnetic structure determination by neutron powder diffraction.

*Physica B***192**, 55–69 (1993).

## Acknowledgements

Work at McMaster University was supported by NSERC of Canada. This work is based on experiments performed at SμS, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland and at the Institut Laue-Langevin, Grenoble, France. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under the NMI3-II Grant number 283883. E.K. acknowledges useful discussions with P. Mendels, F. Bert, S. Petit, L. D. C. Jaubert and C. Decorse.

## Author information

## Affiliations

### Laboratoire de Physique des Solides, CNRS, Univ. Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay Cedex 91405, France

- E. Kermarrec

### Department of Physics and Astronomy, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8S 4M1

- E. Kermarrec
- , J. Gaudet
- & B. D. Gaulin

### Laboratoire National des Champs Magnétiques Intenses, CNRS, Grenoble BP 166-38042, France

- E. Kermarrec

### Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie, Hahn-Meitner-Platz 1, Berlin 14109, Germany

- K. Fritsch

### Laboratory for Muon Spin Spectroscopy, Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen PSI CH-5232, Switzerland

- R. Khasanov
- & Z. Guguchia

### Institut Laue Langevin, BP 156, Grenoble 38042, France

- C. Ritter

### Department of Physics, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523-1875, USA

- K. A. Ross

### Brockhouse Institute for Materials Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8S 4M1

- H. A. Dabkowska
- & B. D. Gaulin

### Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, 180 Dundas St. W., Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1Z8

- B. D. Gaulin

## Authors

### Search for E. Kermarrec in:

### Search for J. Gaudet in:

### Search for K. Fritsch in:

### Search for R. Khasanov in:

### Search for Z. Guguchia in:

### Search for C. Ritter in:

### Search for K. A. Ross in:

### Search for H. A. Dabkowska in:

### Search for B. D. Gaulin in:

### Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

## Corresponding authors

Correspondence to E. Kermarrec or B. D. Gaulin.

## Supplementary information

## PDF files

- 1.
### Supplementary Information

Supplementary figures, supplementary notes and supplementary references.

- 2.
### Peer review file

## Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/