Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Magnetization switching in ferromagnets by adsorbed chiral molecules without current or external magnetic field


Ferromagnets are commonly magnetized by either external magnetic fields or spin polarized currents. The manipulation of magnetization by spin-current occurs through the spin-transfer-torque effect, which is applied, for example, in modern magnetoresistive random access memory. However, the current density required for the spin-transfer torque is of the order of 1 × 106 A·cm−2, or about 1 × 1025 electrons s−1 cm−2. This relatively high current density significantly affects the devices’ structure and performance. Here we demonstrate magnetization switching of ferromagnetic thin layers that is induced solely by adsorption of chiral molecules. In this case, about 1013 electrons per cm2 are sufficient to induce magnetization reversal. The direction of the magnetization depends on the handedness of the adsorbed chiral molecules. Local magnetization switching is achieved by adsorbing a chiral self-assembled molecular monolayer on a gold-coated ferromagnetic layer with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy. These results present a simple low-power magnetization mechanism when operating at ambient conditions.


Ferromagnets are magnetized permanently in domains that are either parallel or antiparallel to the easy axis directions. The magnetization direction can be manipulated using external magnetic fields or spin currents. Using spin currents, that is, electrons spin, could reduce scattering and enhance the devices operational frequency. The Spin currents are commonly employed to magnetize magnetic storage devices or for logical operations utilizing the spin-transfer torque (STT) effect1,2. In this effect the spin angular momentum of the electrons is transferred to the magnetic moments of the ferromagnetic (FM) film. Spin-based devices use the STT effect to reorient magnetization, such as in magnetoresistive random access memory (MRAM)3. Two main problems restrict the use of the STT effect in operating devices: First, the STT usually requires the use of complicated materials and systems, and second, the STT effect efficiency is low. Therefore, large electronic currents are required for inducing magnetization. Usually, the currents are of the order of 1 × 106 A cm−2, or about 1 × 1025 electrons s−1 cm−2 (refs 2, 4). This relatively high current density significantly reduces the total device efficiency and enhances heating effects.

In previous works, it was found that when chiral molecules are self-assembled on gold, the interface has paramagnetic properties5,6,7,8. A similar process occurs in the Magnetism Induced by Proximity of Adsorbed Chiral molecules, or MIPAC effect. Owing to spin-selective electron transfer, the FM layer underneath the molecules becomes spin-polarized and hence magnetized. The magnetization reversal is achieved despite the fact that less than one electron is transferred per adsorbed molecule. The MIPAC effect originates from the well-known phenomenon in which the formation of a self-assembled monolayer (SAM) of molecules with a large dipole moment involves charge transfer that equalizes the electrochemical potential of the adsorbed layer and the sample surface9,10. The charge transfer induced by the SAM formation is responsible for the interesting room temperature (RT) magnetic properties observed when thiolated molecules are adsorbed onto gold2,11,12.

In recent years, it has been established that electron transfer through chiral molecules is spin selective13,14, namely, specific spin orientation is preferred in the transfer process. This effect is referred to as chiral-induced spin selectivity (CISS) where the spin is polarized either parallel or anti-parallel to the electrons’ velocity according to the handedness of the molecules. Hence, as a result of the CISS effect, spin-polarized electron current is produced that can be used to magnetize ferromagnets. This concept was demonstrated in optical15 and electrical16 based devices by driving electrons through chiral layers.

In this work we combined the two properties, the SAM adsorption-induced charge transfer and the CISS effect, to demonstrate the ability to magnetize a FM layer by adsorption of a SAM made from chiral molecules. These results demonstrate magnetization switching of FM thin layers, which is induced solely by adsorption of chiral molecules (magnetism induced by proximity of adsorbed chiral molecules), where less than 1013 electrons per cm2 are sufficient to induce the magnetization reversal on a gold-coated thin FM layer with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy. The locality of magnetization switching is achieved by adsorbing the chiral molecules as a self-assembled monolayer (SAM) in selective adsorption areas. The direction of the magnetization depends on the handedness of the adsorbed chiral molecules.


Magnetic force microscopy probing

The FM structure used was Al2O3/Pt/Au/Co (thickness-1.5–2.2 nm)/Au (thickness-5 nm), which is perpendicularly magnetized in the out-of-plane (OOP) direction. Different Co layer thicknesses were employed, resulting in different coercive fields (Supplementary Fig. 1) and domain sizes5,17,18.

The SAMs were made with two enantiomers of the oligopeptide, which are based on α-helix polyalanine L and D (see Methods section). Both oligopeptides were adsorbed onto predetermined areas on the top gold layer, which caps the under-layer and prevents its oxidation. The L and D enantiomers are referred to as AHPA-L and AHPA-D, respectively, throughout this paper.

The electroresist-coated sample was patterned using electron-beam (e-beam) lithography. The molecules were adsorbed only in the designated areas, after removing the electroresist (Fig. 1). Atomic force microscopy (AFM) and X-ray photospectroscopy (XPS) were used to verify the adsorption of the SAM. Different selective adsorption area sizes were tested ranging from 50 × 50 nm2 to 1 × 1 μm2 (Fig. 1b).

Figure 1: Selective adsorption.
figure 1

(a) Poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) was spin coated on the top of the sample (red) with the top two layers made of Cobalt (grey) and Gold (yellow). (b) Selective areas were patterned using e-beam lithography. (c) The sample was immersed in an ethanolic solution containing the organic molecules (AHPA-L or AHPA-D) (blue). (d) The molecular residue and remaining PMMA were removed by rinsing in ethanol and acetone several times under inert conditions. Selective adsorption areas ranged from 50 × 50 nm2 to 1 × 1 μm2 squares. The molecules were adsorbed at a 40° angle relative to the surface.

The local magnetization was measured using magnetic force microscopy (MFM), a Hall probe and a superconducting quantum interference device with vibrating sample magnetometer (SQUID-VSM). During all MFM measurements the tip scanned at an elevated height, 25–30 nm above the surface, to prevent the topography from influencing the measurement.

The magnetic-induced phase shift in the MFM was measured on the same selective adsorbed areas as the topography ones, as shown in Fig. 2. The slight differences in height between AHPA-L and AHPA-D topography images are attributed to different synthesized purity levels and consequently, to differences in self-assembled monolayer quality. Although the topography appears similar for the two enantiomers (Fig. 2a,b), the measured magnetization is different and correlates with the handedness of the chiral molecules, namely, OOP magnetization that is parallel to the molecules’ major axis for AHPA-L (Fig. 2c) and anti-parallel to the molecules’ major axis for AHPA-D (Fig. 2d). The results were reproducible for many samples and various thicknesses of the cobalt FM layer, and were observed even when the molecules were adsorbed by drop-casting (Methods secion and Supplementary Fig. 2). When the magnetization was recorded over time, we found that it diminished after about nine days. This was true only for samples that were not fully covered with the chiral molecules’ monolayer.

Figure 2: Topography and magnetic phase images.
figure 2

AFM topography images of the SAMs of AHPA-L (a) and AHPA-D (b) adsorbed onto ferromagnetic Co thin layers, including z (nm) and x (μm) scale bars, coated with a 5nm gold over-layer and their corresponding magnetic force microscopy molecular-induced magnetic phase images and colour bars of AHPA-L (c) and AHPA-D (d) magnetization orientation, displaying the same area as seen in the topography images (scale bar is set to 1 μm).

By reducing the dimensions of the selective adsorption area, it was possible to demonstrate a switching of the magnetization on the nanometer scale. The magnetization switching at RT could be observed down to a single domain size. The size of the domains is related to the thickness of the FM layer; therefore, in our samples the minimum size was 250 nm (Fig. 3a). The inset of Fig. 3a shows the average domain size without the adsorbed chiral molecules. Since the FM layers are thin, we expect Néel walls and not Bloch walls between magnetic domains, favouring efficient domain wall motion in the plane19. This property may be useful for moving magnetically induced matrices, thus creating surface memory logic attributes.

Figure 3: Device topography and molecular-induced magnetization.
figure 3

(a) Magnetic force microscopy magnetic phase image of a molecular-induced magnetization direction by AHPA-L chiral molecules in a matrix of 250 × 250 nm2 selective adsorption areas (scale bar is set to 300 nm). The inset shows magnetic domain sizes before adsorbing the molecules (left) with a cross section view (right) along the dashed line. (b) Atomic force microscopy topography image of 1 × 1 μm2, 500 × 500, 250 × 250, 100 × 100 and 50 × 50 nm2 (the latter is shown in the inset) chiral self-assembled monolayer selective adsorption areas (scale bar is set to 500 nm).

When we attempted to probe selective adsorption areas smaller than 250 nm, that is, smaller than the size of a domain in our samples, we managed to see the surface topography but not the MFM magnetic phase image. We attribute this outcome to the inability to reorient magnetization in an area smaller than a single domain size. Furthermore, the MFM magnetic phase measurement of selective adsorption areas patterned on a sample with a very large coercive field on the order of 3,000 Oe (an order of magnitude larger than the proximity-induced coercivity) showed very little response (Supplementary Fig. 3). These results further support the existence of the FM-chiral SAM coupling.

Anomalous Hall Effect

In order to test a variety of FM thin samples, and because the molecular beam epitaxy (MBE)-grown Co samples are difficult to pattern, additional Anomalous Hall Effect (AHE) measurements20,21 were conducted on 7 nm Ni FM e-beam evaporated film, capped with a thin 2 nm gold over-layer (see Methods section). Here too, a similar molecular proximity-induced magnetization behaviour was obtained using this measurement technique with a different magnetic film. It was previously shown that an evaporated 7 nm Ni film on a Si substrate has an OOP easy axis22. The thin FM Ni layer acts as the conductive channel in which the AHE occurs. As in the MFM measurements, the adsorption of molecules resulted in magnetization switching of the FM layer. Initially, a calibration measurement of the Hall coefficient and the Hall probe asymmetry was done before molecular adsorption was performed15. Later, the molecules were drop-casted onto the device and dried under inert conditions, without any additional changes made in the electrical setup. Hall measurements were performed after molecules were chemisorbed onto the gold over-layer that covers the conductive Ni channel, resulting in a constant induced magnetic field. Hence, the unchanged nature of the Hall resistance during the time scale shown in Fig. 4c is the manifestation of that fixed induced magnetic field. The resistance was measured, where Vy is the potential measured between the Hall electrodes and Ix is the source-drain current.

Figure 4: Anomalous Hall effect device configuration scheme and results.
figure 4

Current Ix=1 mA is driven along the x-axis, voltage, Vy, is measured along the y-axis at room temperature. (a,b) AHPA-L (AHPA-D) chiral molecules adsorbed onto the conducting channel induce upwards (downwards) magnetization H as denoted by a blue (red) arrow, respectively. (c) The difference between Rxy for a bare sample and Rxy after AHPA-L (blue) and AHPA-D (red) adsorption. The unchanged Hall resistance seen during the time of measurement is the manifestation of a constant induced magnetic field caused by the molecular adsorption. Different devices display different asymmetries although all have a consistent ΔRxy opposite sign for both molecule types. (c, inset) Superconducting quantum interference device with vibrating sample magnetometer M(H) data for the AHPA-L adsorbed and bare configurations of the thin multilayer sample. The AHPA-L adsorption shifted the magnetization loop by 10–15 Oe, which is around 50% of the full magnetization value of the thin multilayer sample (not the anomalous Hall effect sample).

The results of the AHE measurements are presented in Fig. 4, accompanied by a scheme describing the experimental setup. Since the AHPA-L and AHPA-D molecules induced magnetization in opposite directions, the Hall voltage, Vy, in both cases has an opposite sign, resulting in a change of sign of Rxy. The asymmetry between the values measured for the two enantiomers may result from asymmetry in the current flow through the Hall channel due to differences arising from the fabrication process. Several devices were tested, all of which showed opposite ΔRxy signs for the two different enantiomers.

Magnetic moment analysis

The MIPAC effect was also verified using a SQUID-VSM. In these studies, the FM layer was 10 Al2O3|2 TaN|1.5 Pt|0.2 Au|0.3 Co|0.7 Ni|0.15 Co|1 Au (thicknesses in nanometers). Here the magnetization of the sample was first saturated and then the molecules were deposited. The sample size was 4 × 4 mm2 and had a saturation magnetic moment of ±1.5 × 10−5 e.m.u., where the sign refers to the direction of the magnetic moment, namely, the plus sign denotes a magnetic moment pointing away from the surface, whereas the negative sign refers to the moment pointing towards the surface. We saturated the magnetization in each sample using an external magnetic field, and then adsorbed the chiral molecules with the opposite sign, which should reverse the magnetization. This was done for both directions of magnetic field. Samples were measured with and without molecules. The molecular-induced magnetization was compared to the saturated magnetization of the sample. We found that the adsorption of the chiral molecules changed the magnetic moment of the sample by about 35% relative to the saturation magnetization, with a positive sign for AHPA-L and a negative one for AHPA-D. Taking into account the molecular density of 1013 molecules per cm2, sample size and the 35% molecular-induced change in magnetic moment 0.525 × 10−5 emu, we can deduce that the magnetic moment per molecule is 3.28 × 10−18 e.m.u. Since the MFM measurements show no domain formation under the chiral adsorbed layer, we relate the partial magnetization reversal to the rotation of the magnetic easy axis due to the molecular adsorption angle, as was measured in other materials23,24. The angle of the chiral molecules was measured to be 40° relative to the surface normal. It is important to realize that the orientation of the molecules is defined by this angle and therefore the average direction of magnetization will be perpendicular to the surface normal but with a lower value. Figure 4c inset shows M(H) magnetization loop for the sample, comparing between the magnetization loop after AHPA-L adsorption and bare samples. The AHPA-L adsorption shifted the magnetization loop by 10–15 Oe, which is around 50% of the full magnetization value of the sample.


The experimental results show that adsorbed chiral molecules induce magnetization switching in the FM samples at RT. We ascribe the observed results to a proximity effect where the wavefunction of the electrons in the FM is coupled to the SAM through the Au layer (Fig. 5). Since only the wavefunction with the preferred spin orientation can penetrate into the SAM, the density of states in the FM is not the same for the two spin orientations and as a result, magnetization in a specific direction is observed. This model explains the dependence of the switching direction upon the adsorption of the two enantiomers. Similarly to the CISS effect, here too the delocalized wavefunction is influenced by the molecules’ chirality. The delocalization of sample surface states, upon adsorption of a top layer, is well documented in the literature17,18. Weak adsorption-induced paramagnetic behaviour was observed when thiolated molecules were adsorbed onto gold5,6,7,8, and the effect of wavefunction penetration from the surface to the adsorbed layer was calculated for various organic-inorganic interfaces25. From a semi-classical perspective in can be understood that when chiral molecules are adsorbed onto a gold layer covering a Co thin film, the SAM dipoles lower the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital state (LUMO) to be partially below the Fermi level. As a result, electrons are transferred to the SAM and fill the empty states. The transferred electrons are spin-polarized due to the molecules’ chirality. Consequently, stimulated spin-splitting takes place, which dictates the directionality. It was found that up to one electron per molecule can be transferred26. Therefore, with the SAMs used in the current study, this results in 1013 electrons·cm−2 that are being transferred. Note that the electrons that transfer to the LUMO state lose coherence much faster than the FM layer electrons.

Figure 5: Experimental concept.
figure 5

In the semi-classical approach the adsorption induces transfer of electrons with a specific spin from the FM layer to the SAM (denoted by the green arrow). Owing to the SAM dipoles, the LUMO is partially below the Fermi level (dashed line). Electrons are transferred to the SAM to fill the now empty states below the Fermi energy. The transferred electrons have a specific spin because of the chirality of the AHPA-D (a) or AHPA-L (b) molecules. Consequently, splitting in the spin states’ density in the FM is created, hence directional magnetization. (c) In the suggested quantum mechanical approach the electronic wave function (green) delocalization induces imbalances in spin-up (blue) and spin-down (red) populations, indicated as anisotropic magnetization H pointing upwards or downwards, respectively.

The results obtained from the SQUID-SVM measurements indicate that the FM magnetization easy axis rotates due to the MIPAC effect. This may explain the reduction in magnetization over time if the film is only partly covered by molecules. This partial coverage leads to greater tilting of the molecules and as a result, to weaker FM molecular coupling. With time, the neighboring FM domains orient the magnetization according to the original orientation. This is attributed to the exchanged interaction that causes the domains outside the selective adsorption areas to gradually reorient the molecular-induced magnetization back to an average state. Longer-lasting magnetization could probably be achieved by changing the ferromagnetic materials and linkers’ angle. The fact that MIPAC affects a very thin layer can be utilized for the specific magnetization of one thin layer in a multilayer structure. Selective etching and adsorption of local chiral molecules can be used to write three-dimensional matrices (Supplementary Fig. 4), which can be moved by domain wall motion.

To summarize, MIPAC presents a way to achieve simple and local magnetization on ferromagnetic material. MIPAC is a surface effect in which OOP magnetization is induced in FM thin films by the adsorption of chiral molecules. The magnetization is realized without the use of an external magnetic field or electrical current. The direction of magnetization depends on the chirality of the adsorbed molecules. The magnetization can be induced on preselected small areas by controlling the adsorption of the chiral molecules. In principle, the magnetization can be localized to an area as small as a single domain, thereby overcoming the tendency of FM materials to become super-paramagnetic on shrinking their size to the dimensions of a single domain. This concept can be used to achieve simple surface spintronic logic devices.


MFM probing of selective adsorption areas

Thin film samples were grown by the molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) method, in the configuration Al203 (0001)/Pt (5 nm)/Au (20 nm)/Co (1.5–2.2 nm)/Au (5 nm). A Pt buffer layer was deposited at 650 °C to ensure an atomically flat buffer layer surface—sharp streaks were visible in the RHEED image. Crystallographic orientation of the grown layers was as follows: Pt(1110), Au(111), Co(0001) and Au(111). Pt was deposited using an electron gun; Co and Au—from effusion cells. Samples differed in their Co thickness, ranging from 1.5 nm (used most often) to 2.2 nm, thus resulting in different coercive field Hc values, but all had rectangular hysteresis loops for a magnetic field direction perpendicular to the plane, which is characteristic of the OOP easy axis. Hysteresis loops were measured by a polar magneto-optic Kerr effect (P-MOKE) for each sample (Supplementary Fig. 1).

Sample cleaning was performed with N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) at 80 °C for 10 min, followed by washing in isopropanol and water. Owing to FM layer sensitivity to exerted forces, no aggressive cleaning was done (for example, no plasma asher or ozonator). Alignment marks were evaporated in order to locate the adsorption areas, during which samples were spin coated with conventional lift-off resist (LOR) followed by a hard bake for 5 min at 200 °C. After cool down, the samples were then spin-coated with AZ1505 photoresist followed by an additional bake for 90 s at 110 °C. Alignment marks were patterned by Laser writer Microtech LW405B and later developed by AZ726 developer. Marks were produced by evaporation of 15 nm Cr and 150 nm Au at −5 °C, followed by a conventional liftoff procedure of 10 min in NMP at 80 °C, washing in isopropanol and rinsing in water. To pattern selective adsorption areas, PMMA electroresist was spin-coated onto the sample surface followed by a 2 min hard bake at 180 °C, resulting in a 44nm coating layer (Fig. 1a). Test samples that underwent this entire procedure exhibited unchanged magnetic behaviour, suggesting that all samples used were magnetically intact. An e-beam was used to pattern the selective areas of different sizes ranging from 1 × 1 μm2 to 50 × 50 nm2 (Fig. 1b). Here we used SAMs of opposite chirality: AHPA-L and its mirror image AHPA-D, which are based on α-helix L and D amino acids (H-CAAAAKAAAAKAAAAKAAAAKAAAAKAAAAKAAAAK-OH), where C, A, and K represent cysteine, alanine and lysine, respectively. Adsorption was performed under inert conditions. Initially, samples were immersed in absolute ethanol for 20 min, dried in nitrogen and later placed into a solution consisting of 1 mM AHPA-L (or D) in ethanol and left overnight (Fig. 1c). Following the SAM adsorption, the samples were immediately washed in absolute ethanol to remove the un-bonded molecular residue, followed by washing in absolute acetone to remove the remaining PMMA layer, and finally bathed in ethanol again (Fig. 1d). This cleaning procedure was repeated several times (for both AHPA-L and AHPA-D). Although some resist residue still remained, and appeared corrugated in the force microscopy images, the AFM images clearly show the adsorbed SAMs inside the selective e-beam-patterned areas (Fig. 2a,b).

During the MFM measurements, simultaneous topography and magnetic phase images were obtained. The samples were investigated by Atomic Force Microscopy (D3100, Nanoscope V controller, Bruker, Santa Barbara, CA, USA). The AFM non-contact mode and tapping mode were used to determine the magnetic domains simultaneously with the surface topography of the samples. The images, ranging from 1 × 1 to 10 × 10 μm2, were obtained in air by using Si probes with Co-Cr coating (MESP, k5 N/m, F75 kHz, Bruker). Interleave scanning was applied to obtain the magnetic images. For scanning, we raised the tip height to 25–30 nm from the surface to prevent the topographic and magnetic forces from interacting. The phase-detection mode was used to collect the magnetic signal, where the signal of the phase shift was around 1.2°. Without a magnetic field, the phase shift was zero, corresponding to the maximum of the resonance peak.

Anomalous Hall Effect measurements

The AHE device was constructed from a 4 × 40 μm2 Hall channel made from 7 nm Ni capped with 2 nm Au on top of a thermally induced SiO2 surface. The Au over-layer prevents oxidation of the FM sub-layer. A current of Ix=1 mA was driven along the channel (only in the Ni layer) while Voltage, Vy, was measured perpendicular to the current direction (Fig. 4a,b). The AHE device was placed on a chip and its contact pads were bonded to the chip using gold ball bonders. During the AHE measurements, the device remained attached to its carrying chip, where 4 μl of the 1 mM molecules in ethanolic solution were drop-casted (Supplementary Fig. 2) onto the top of the device and later dried in an inert environment. Drop-casting is used to prevent changes in the assembly of the bonders connecting the sample to the chip, thus ensuring that any change in the Hall Voltage readout is only due to the added molecules.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on request.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Ben Dor, O. et al. Magnetization switching in ferromagnets by adsorbed chiral molecules without current or external magnetic field. Nat. Commun. 8, 14567 doi: 10.1038/ncomms14567 (2017).

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. Tsoi, M. et al. Excitation of a magnetic multilayer by an electric current. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4281–4284 (1998).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Myers, E. B., Ralph, D. C., Katine, J. A., Louie, R. N. & Buhrman, R. A. Current-induced switching of domains in magnetic multilayer devices. Science 285, 867–870 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hosomi, M. et al. A novel nonvolatile memory with spin torque transfer magnetization switching: spin-ram. IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting, 2005. in Proc. IEDM Technical Digest 459–462 (2005).

  4. Diao, Z. et al. Spin-transfer torque switching in magnetic tunnel junctions and spin-transfer torque random access memory. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 19, 165209 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Carmeli, I., Leitus, G., Naaman, R., Reich, S. & Vager, Z. Magnetism induced by the organization of self-assembled monolayers. J. Chem. Phys. 118, 10372–10375 (2003).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hernando, A., Crespo, P. & García, M. A. Origin of orbital ferromagnetism and giant magnetic anisotropy at the nanoscale. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 57206 (2006).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Crespo, P. et al. Permanent magnetism, magnetic anisotropy, and hysteresis of thiol-capped gold nanoparticles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 087204 (2004).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yamamoto, Y. et al. Direct observation of ferromagnetic spin polarization in gold nanoparticles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 11680 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ishii, H., Sugiyama, K., Ito, E. & Seki, K. Energy level alignment and interfacial electronic structures at organic metal and organic interfaces. Adv. Mater. 11, 605–625 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Vager, Z. & Naaman, R. Surprising electronic–magnetic properties of close-packed organized organic layers. Chem. Phys. 281, 305–309 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Callsen, M., Caciuc, V., Kiselev, N., Atodiresei, N. & Blügel, S. Magnetic hardening induced by nonmagnetic organic molecules. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 106805 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Vager, Z. & Naaman, R. Bosons as the origin for giant magnetic properties of organic monolayers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 087205 (2004).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Naaman, R. & Waldeck, D. H. Chiral-Induced spin selectivity effect. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 3, 2178–2187 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Naaman, R. & Waldeck, D. H. Spintronics and chirality: spin selectivity in electron transport through chiral molecules. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 66, 263–281 (2015).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ben Dor, O., Morali, N., Yochelis, S., Baczewski, L. T. & Paltiel, Y. Local light-induced magnetization using nanodots and chiral molecules. Nano Lett. 14, 6042–6049 (2014).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ben Dor, O., Yochelis, S., Mathew, S. P., Naaman, R. & Paltiel, Y. A chiral-based magnetic memory device without a permanent magnet. Nat. Commun. 4, 2256 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kisielewski, M., Maziewski, A., Tekielak, M., Wawro, A. & Baczewski, L. T. New possibilities for tuning ultrathin cobalt film magnetic properties by a noble metal overlayer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 087203 (2002).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kisielewski, M. et al. Magnetic ordering in ultrathin Cobalt film covered by an overlayer of noble metals. J. Appl. Phys. 93, 7628–7630 (2003).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Franken, J. H., Herps, M., Swagten, H. J. M. & Koopmans, B. Tunable chiral spin texture in magnetic domain-walls. Sci. Rep. 4, 5248 (2014).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chang, C.-Z. et al. Experimental observation of the quantum anomalous hall effect in a magnetic topological insulator. Science 340, 167–170 (2013).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Qiao, Z. et al. Quantum anomalous Hall effect in Graphene proximity coupled to an antiferromagnetic insulator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 116404 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Milana, S., Barbone, M., Ferrari, A. C., Ramos, H. & Majima, Y. Characterization of Ni thin films following thermal oxidation in air. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 32, 051808 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zakrassov, A., Leitus, G., Cohen, S. R. & Naaman, R. Adsorption-induced magnetization of PbS Self-assembled nanoparticles on GaAs. Adv. Mater. 20, 2552–2555 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zakrassov, A. et al. Controlling the anisotropic magnetic dipolar interactions of PbSe self-assembled nanoparticles on GaAs. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 11, 7549–7552 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Natan, A., Zidon, Y., Shapira, Y. & Kronik, L. Cooperative effects and dipole formation at semiconductor and self-assembled-monolayer interfaces. Phys. Rev. B 73, 193310 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ito, E. et al. Spontaneous buildup of giant surface potential by vacuum deposition of Alq3 and its removal by visible light irradiation. J. Appl. Phys. 92, 7306–7310 (2002).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


Y.P. acknowledges support from the Volkswagen Foundation (VW 88 367), from the Israel Science Foundation (ISF grant no. 1248/10), and the MOS Israel. R.N. acknowledges support in part from the European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Program (FP7/2007–2013) / ERC grant agreement no (338720), from the MOS Israel and from the VW Foundation (VW 88 367). O.B.D. would also like to acknowledge the Israeli Ministry of Science, Technology and Space grant 0399174. Y.P. and O.B.D. thank I. Eisenberg for his helpful and professional graphical contribution to this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



The manuscript was written with contributions from all authors. All authors have approved the final version of the manuscript and participated in the discussions related to the work. L.T.B. and A.C. were responsible for growth and characterization of the thin film samples using the M.B.E. method. O.B.D. and K.V. fabricated and characterized the devices and performed the experimental work. A.R. performed the M.F.M. measurements. S.Y. and E.C. were in charge of the chemical aspects of the paper. Y.P. and R.N. supervised the work. O.B.D., S.Y., R.N. and Y.P. developed the narrative and major concepts presented in the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yossi Paltiel.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures (PDF 570 kb)

Peer Review File (PDF 221 kb)

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ben Dor, O., Yochelis, S., Radko, A. et al. Magnetization switching in ferromagnets by adsorbed chiral molecules without current or external magnetic field. Nat Commun 8, 14567 (2017).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing