Article | Open | Published:

Super-Coulombic atom–atom interactions in hyperbolic media

Nature Communications volume 8, Article number: 14144 (2017) | Download Citation


Dipole–dipole interactions, which govern phenomena such as cooperative Lamb shifts, superradiant decay rates, Van der Waals forces and resonance energy transfer rates, are conventionally limited to the Coulombic near-field. Here we reveal a class of real-photon and virtual-photon long-range quantum electrodynamic interactions that have a singularity in media with hyperbolic dispersion. The singularity in the dipole–dipole coupling, referred to as a super-Coulombic interaction, is a result of an effective interaction distance that goes to zero in the ideal limit irrespective of the physical distance. We investigate the entire landscape of atom–atom interactions in hyperbolic media confirming the giant long-range enhancement. We also propose multiple experimental platforms to verify our predicted effect with phonon–polaritonic hexagonal boron nitride, plasmonic super-lattices and hyperbolic meta-surfaces as well. Our work paves the way for the control of cold atoms above hyperbolic meta-surfaces and the study of many-body physics with hyperbolic media.


Dipole–dipole interactions (DDIs) are instrumental in mediating entanglement and superradiance in cold atoms1,2,3, as well as coherent coupling between single molecules or atoms4,5,6,7. Often described by real and virtual photon exchange, they also cause cooperative frequency shifts between superconducting qubits in circuit quantum electrodynamic (QED) systems8,9 and Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) between dye molecules or quantum dots10,11. There are two fundamental ways of controlling the strength and length scales of DDIs. The first method involves the tuning of intrinsic atomic properties such as transition dipole moments and transition frequencies (cf. highly excited Rydberg atoms and superconducting qubits7,12,13). The second method involves the tuning of the QED vacuum, achieved through cavities, waveguides and photonic bandgaps14,15,16,17. Up to now, these electrodynamic methods have relied on resonant effects that require large quality factors along with extensive nanofabrication steps. It is an open question, however, whether there exists alternative non-resonant techniques for controlling DDIs that would be robust to broad spectral lineshapes of atoms or molecules with possible room temperature applications. Here we present work related to this new avenue of research.

In this study, we reveal a class of divergent excited-state atom–atom interactions that can occur in natural and artificial media with hyperbolic dispersion. Unlike the above mentioned approaches, which engineer radiative coupling, we show that the homogeneous hyperbolic medium itself fundamentally alters the Coulombic near-field. The resultant singular long-range interaction, referred to as a super-Coulombic interaction, is described by an effective interaction distance that goes to zero (re→0) along a material-dependent resonance angle. We show that this interaction affects the entire landscape of real photon and virtual photon phenomena such as the cooperative Lamb shift (CLS), the cooperative decay rate (CDR), resonance energy transfer rates and frequency shifts, as well as resonant interatomic forces. Although we find that the singularity is curtailed by material absorption, it still allows for interactions with much larger magnitudes and longer ranges than those found in any conventional media. We also show that atoms in a hyperbolic medium will exhibit a strong orientational dependence that can effectively switch the dipolar interaction off or on, providing an additional degree of freedom to control DDI. Our investigation reveals a marked contrast between ground-state and excited-state interactions which can be used to distinguish the super-Coulombic effect in experiment. Finally, we provide a unified perspective for controlling DDIs on multiple experimental platforms for hyperbolic media including plasmonic super-lattices, hyperbolic metasurfaces and natural hyperbolic media such as hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN).

We emphasize that the materials platform we introduce in this study, to enhance DDIs, is fundamentally different from the cavity QED18,19 or waveguide QED regimes5,8,20,21 (see Supplementary Table 1). We do not rely on atom confinement2,5,6,7,19, cavity resonances or modal effects such as the quasi transverse electromagnetic (TEM) mode in circuit QED8, the band-edge slow light as in PhC waveguides5,6,22, the low-mode volume of plasmonic waveguides21,23 or the infinite phase velocity at the cutoff frequency of epsilon-near-zero (ENZ) waveguides14,24. We also stress that the super-Coulombic effect engineers the conventional non-radiative (longitudinal) near-fields as opposed to radiative (transverse) modes and will occur over a broad range of frequencies due to the broadband nature of the hyperbolic dispersion relation25,26,27,28. Figure 1 depicts a schematic of the proposed super-Coulombic DDI using h-BN29,30,31,32 and two dopant atoms. In the infrared spectral range, h-BN is a uniaxial material that supports ordinary waves (polarization perpendicular to the optic axis) and extraordinary waves (polarization along the optic axis). Extraordinary waves satisfy the hyperbolic dispersion relation when .

Figure 1: Overview of super-Coulombic interaction.
Figure 1

The proposed long-range super-Coulombic DDI may be observed (a) between single-photon defect centres in natural hyperbolic media (for example, h-BN, Bi2Se3 and Bi2Te3) or (b) between ultra-cold atoms trapped above a hyperbolic meta-surface. (c,d) The super-Coulombic interaction occurs over a broad range of frequencies along the resonance angle of a hyperbolic medium and causes the effective interaction distance to approach zero irrespective of the physical distance.


QED theory of hyperbolic media

We begin by formulating the QED theory33 of DDIs between two neutral, non-magnetic atoms in a hyperbolic medium. We focus on dipolar interactions where the electrodynamic field is initially prepared in the vacuum state . Using the multipolar Hamiltonian, the interaction of two neutral atoms [positions rj, transition frequencies ωj and transition electric dipole moments (j=a, b)] is specified by the interaction Hamiltonian

where h.c. stands for the Hermitian conjugate. The matter-assisted electric field is given by

and G(r, r′;ω) is the classical dyadic Green function that satisfies the macroscopic Maxwell equations. Here, and are bosonic field operators, which play the role of the creation and annihilation operators of the matter-assisted electromagnetic (polaritonic) field. The unique interaction properties are a direct result of the dispersion relation of the hyperbolic polariton, as opposed to the photonic dispersion relation, ω=ck, seen in vacuum. The electric field is defined so that it rigorously satisfies the equal-time commutation relations and fluctuation–dissipation theorem33. We use conventional perturbation theory to calculate the various dipolar interactions in a hyperbolic medium. We emphasize that the QED theory captures both ground state–ground state interactions and excited state–ground state interactions, which a semiclassical approach cannot.

Resonant dipole–dipole interaction

If the initial state of the atomic system is prepared in the symmetric or anti-symmetric state, , then one can show that the resonant DDI (RDDI) (see Methods) is given by

where is the transition dipole moment of atom j, assumed to be real. Jdd is the CLS (also known as the virtual photon exchange interaction) and γdd is the CDR commonly associated with superradiant or subradiant effects.

Our result for the RDDI in a hyperbolic medium is

valid when rarb. The first term arises exclusively from extraordinary waves following a hyperbolic dispersion, whereas the second term arises from a combination of ordinary and extraordinary waves. Here we have defined the near-field and far-field dipole orientation matrix factors and , respectively. Equation (4) reduces to the vacuum RDDI expression when , which is applicable both in the retarded (rλ) and non-retarded (r<<λ) regimes. The most unique aspect of DDIs in uniaxial media is the divergence that is predicted from the first term only when the hyperbolic condition is satisfied. In the ideal lossless limit, we find that the effective interaction distance between two atoms, , tends towards the limit

This super-Coulombic effect results in the divergence of the DDI strength |Vdd|/ħ along the resonance angle θR, defined with respect to the optic axis.

Atoms in a hyperbolic medium will then have an associated CLS and CDR

in the limit θθR. Equations (6) and (7) are the dominant factors of the extraordinary wave contribution only.

We now contrast the scaling of CLS with distance when mediated by hyperbolic media as opposed to vacuum modes. In vacuum, for separation distances much larger than the transition wavelength, the CLS scales as and becomes much smaller than the free-space spontaneous emission rate (γo). On the other hand, for distances much smaller than the wavelength, the CLS scales as , which implies that it can become much larger than the spontaneous emission rate. In contrast, the CLS in a hyperbolic medium is dependent on , , for all interatomic distances. The material-dependent factor 1/ diverges in the lossless case and therefore results in giant CLSs for short and large interatomic distances.

This marked contrast is also revealed in the CDR. At large distances, the CDR in vacuum scales as , therefore becoming weak for distances much larger than the wavelength. For distances much smaller than the wavelength, the CDR becomes independent of position, , and remains on the order of the free-space spontaneous emission rate. In contrast, the CDR in a hyperbolic medium along the resonance angle is not dependent on the effective interaction distance re and instead it depends crucially on the orientation angle φ of the dipoles, . When both dipoles are oriented perpendicular to the optic axis (φ=π/2), there exists a unique wavelength when the medium can achieve an anisotropic ENZ medium ( and ) resulting in a divergent CDR. Surprisingly, the effect is independent of interatomic distance. When both dipoles are parallel to the optic axis (φ=0), the same anisotropic ENZ condition gives a null CDR between the two atoms, independent of interatomic distance.

We will now consider the role of material absorption ( and ) on atom–atom interactions in a hyperbolic medium. We find that the effective interaction distance is not zero and tends to the finite value . This curtails the singularity of the hyperbolic dipolar interaction but nevertheless allows for very large interaction strengths compared with conventional media whenever |re|/|r|<1 is satisfied. Material absorption will also modify the spatial scaling laws of the RDDI in equation (3) so that both the CDR and Lamb shift will scale as . Another consequence of material absorption on RDDIs is in the transition from non-retarded (r−3) to retarded (r−1) interactions. In vacuum, the transition occurs when the interatomic separation distance is on the order of wavelength,. In an ideal lossless hyperbolic medium, this transition from near-field to far-field does not occur, as the effective separation distance approaches zero, re→0 specifically along the resonance angle of a hyperbolic medium. Therefore, we find that RDDI should scale with the characteristic power law of near-field (longitudinal) non-radiative interactions (r−3) for all interatomic distances. Once material absorption is included, the transition is expected to occur approximately when . The dipolar interactions will transition from the power law to the exponential scaling law , which is valid at large interatomic distances.

Figure 2 shows the result of the CLS and CDR for two z-oriented dipoles in a hyperbolic medium that includes material absorption. We compare the RDDIs with the conventional results of a lossy dielectric and vacuum. It is noteworthy that the RDDI peaks near the resonance angle θR as predicted theoretically. The spatial field plots in the insets clearly demonstrate the distinguishing features of the RDDI in a hyperbolic medium compared with vacuum. Figure 2c,d demonstrate the super-Coulombic spatial dependence along the resonance angle. It is noteworthy that the sign of the interaction is dependent on the orientation of the dipoles, as well as the relative position of the dipoles within the hyperbolic medium.

Figure 2: Manifestation of super-Coulombic interaction in hyperbolic media.
Figure 2

Angular dependence of (a) CLS Jdd and (b) CDR γdd for two z-oriented dipoles in a lossy hyperbolic medium, lossy dielectric and vacuum. The CLS and CDR have large peaks near the resonance angle of the hyperbolic medium indicative of the super-Coulombic interaction, even for distances of a wavelength. Comparison of (c) CLS and (d) CDR at the resonance angle versus interatomic separation distance. The CLS and CDR both obey a 1/r3 power law dependence in the near-field due to the inclusion of absorption in the hyperbolic medium. It is noteworthy that the giant interactions start occuring at distances on the order of a wavelength (arrows) even in the presence of material absorption, which is in stark contrast to vacuum. The insets show the contrasting spatially-resolved (c) CLS and (d) CDR for vacuum and for a hyperbolic medium.

Orientational dependence

We now turn to the unique orientational dependence of the RDDI between two atoms positioned along the resonance angle θR. In Fig. 3, we plot the normalized CLS of two atoms a full wavelength apart (r=λ) as a function of dipole orientation angle φ. The CLS has a minimum when φ=θR and a maximum when φ=θR+π/2. Assuming that , , and , we find that the ratio between the maximum and minimum is

Figure 3: Unique orientational dependence of RDDI in hyperbolic media.
Figure 3

The plot shows CLS versus orientation angle φ for two dipoles positioned along the resonance angle. The CLS is minimized when the dipoles are collinear with the the resonance angle and it is maximized when the dipoles are perpendicular to the resonance angle. The inset shows the asymmetric nature of the spatially-resolved Jdd/γo when the dipoles are orthogonal to the resonance angle.

showing that it is proportional to the square of the figure of merit of the hyperbolic medium. In Fig. 3, we use the full Green’s function to calculate the orientational dependence of the dipolar interaction in a hyperbolic medium with material absorption and find excellent agreement with the analytical expression.

Resonance energy transfer

We now consider second-order super-Coulombic QED interactions between non-identical atoms arising from initial state preparation consisting of atom A in its excited state and atom B in its ground state, . In the weak-coupling regime, an irreversible resonance energy transfer takes place, transferring a photon from atom A to atom B. This process is FRET and the transfer rate given by Fermi’s golden rule is ΓET=2πħ−1|Vdd|2δ(ħωaħωb). Along the resonance angle, FRET is mediated by hyperbolic modes and the rate is given by

which shows a scaling dependence and giant enhancement—the key signature of second order super-Coulombic interactions in hyperbolic media.

Casimir–Polder potential

In addition to the FRET rate, there is also a predicted frequency shift that comes from the initial state preparation . This is the excited-state Casimir–Polder potential, , composed of a resonant and off-resonant contribution. The resonant excited-state Casimir–Polder potential is of the form (ref. 34). We therefore predict that the excited-state energy potential will also diverge with a scaling dependence similar to the FRET rate.

Figure 4 shows the full numerical results for the second-order DDIs in a lossy hyperbolic medium, a lossy dielectric and vacuum. In the non-retarded regime , we clearly see the effect of the super-Coulombic interaction, which results in a large enhancement of the dipolar interactions Ueg and ΓET (shown in inset). The super-Coulombic enhancement occurs only along the asymptotes of the hyperboloid and is unrelated to the suppression of FRET rate of an ensemble of emitters near a conventional metallic surface or hyperbolic medium35,36,37.

Figure 4: Ground-state and excited-state Casimir–Polder interaction energy in hyperbolic media.
Figure 4

Casimir–Polder interaction energy between two ground-state atoms (Ugg) and between an excited-state atom and ground-state atom (Ueg) show fundamental differences when interacting in hyperbolic medium. UegUgg, as resonant interactions lie completely within the bandwidth of hyperbolic dispersion and are strongly enhanced. The results are normalized to Ugg in vacuum, evaluated at the near-field interatomic distance of ro=λ/100. The inset shows the giant enhancement of the FRET rate, ΓET, as compared with vacuum. The FRET rate is normalized to the vacuum energy transfer rate evaluated at ro.

It is interesting that the dispersive van der Waals interaction between two ground-state atoms does not diverge in a hyperbolic medium. Using fourth-order perturbation theory38, the interaction energy between two ground-state atoms is given by , where αA,B(ω) is the isotropic electric polarizability of atom A or B. In the non-retarded limit, the dominant contribution is given by

which reduces to the well-known free-space non-retarded van der Waals interaction energy when . It is important to note that the integral is performed over the entire range of positive imaginary frequencies (η=). In general, the hyperbolic condition is only satisfied within a finite bandwidth of the electromagnetic spectrum. We therefore expect that it would not alter the broadband cumulative effect of the entire electromagnetic spectrum and, as a result, we predict that the ground state–ground state interaction energy will not diverge in a hyperbolic medium. From Fig. 4, it is also clear that the ground state–ground state Casimir–Polder potential Ugg does not show any type of enhancement for the hyperbolic medium, in agreement with our discussion. It is noteworthy that the distance scaling dependence in the non-retarded regions is in agreement with equations (9) and (10), as expected. In the retarded regime (rλ), the excited-state interactions Ueg and ΓET display an exponential damping behaviour due to material absorption, whereas the ground-state interaction Ugg displays the typical Casimir–Polder power law dependence, r−7 (Fig. 4).


In the following, we discuss multiple experimental platforms for hyperbolic media paving the way for the experimental demonstration of the long-range super-Coulombic interactions and unique many-body physics in hyperbolic media.

Figure 5a–b propose a practical plasmonic super-lattice system to enhance atom-atom interactions taking into account the role of dissipation, dispersion and finite unit cell size. We show the large enhancement of CLS (Jdd) for an effective medium model and compare it with a 40-layer structure consisting of Ag and TiO2 with a total slab thickness of 100 nm. For such a system, effective medium theory predicts a type I response for wavelengths smaller than 492 nm and a type II response for wavelengths larger than 492 nm. Atom A is 4 nm away from the top interface (see Fig. 5 inset), whereas atom B is assumed to be adsorbed to the bottom interface. Atom B has a fixed horizontal displacement of xb=5 nm and therefore there is a fixed separation angle θo between atom A and atom B with respect to the normal to the interface. The two large peaks seen in Fig. 5 occur when the dispersive resonance angle θR(λ) is equal to the fixed separation angle, that is, θR(λ)=θo in agreement with theory. For the material system shown here, this occurs both in the type I and type II hyperbolic regions. The inset shows the directional sensitivity of the interaction as a function of atom B’s horizontal displacement. It is noteworthy that accurate agreement between the effective medium model and the super-lattice structure is achieved when the unit-cell size is smaller than the separation distance between atom A and the top interface (Supplementary Note 1).

Figure 5: Giant long-range CLS in practical structures.
Figure 5

(a,b) Plasmonic super-lattice in visible range and (c,d) natural hyperbolic medium in infrared range. (a) The effective hyperbolic model is compared with (b) a 40-layer multilayer system taking into account dissipation, dispersion and finite unit cell size. Atom A is 4 nm away from top interface, whereas atom B is adsorbed to the bottom interface with a horizontal displacement of xb=5 nm. The inset shows the CLS dependence on atom B’s horizontal displacement when λ=550 nm. Good agreement is seen between the EMT model and practical multilayer design paving the way for an experimental demonstration of the super-Coulombic effect with cold atoms. CLS for (c) two atoms above h-BN and (d) two atoms across an h-BN structure; dashed lines denote bulk vacuum results. It is noteworthy that a smaller spontaneous emission rate in the infrared range will contribute to a larger normalized CLS Jdd/γo. The orange and blue curves denote the two orientations of the transition dipole moment of the atoms. The total slab thickness for both structures is 100 nm.

Figure 5c,d propose a two-dimensional van der Waals bonded natural material, hBN, as a candidate material to control optically active vibrational transitions between molecules, or electronic intersubband transitions between quantum wells. hBN is a natural hyperbolic medium in the mid-infrared spectral range. We show giant CLSs Jdd for the case of two atoms 10 nm away from the top interface of an h-BN structure, as well as for two atoms across an h-BN film. In the first case, the atom–atom interaction is due to a super-Coulombic ray-like interaction that reflects from the bottom interface (see insets). In the second case, the interatomic interaction is primarily due to a direct super-Coulombic interaction from atom A to atom B. Atom A is 10 nm above the top interface, whereas atom B is assumed to be adsorbed to the bottom interface. It is noteworthy that these long-range DDIs are seen equally in the type I hyperbolic region (λ12–13μm) and in the type II hyperbolic region (λ6–7 μm). We have used the experimentally verified permittivities for h-BN from Caldwell et al.29 for our numerical simulations.

Finally, Fig. 6 proposes a two-dimensional material system to enhance RDDIs, using hyperbolic metasurfaces. Our theoretical proposal provides additional future directions for designer metasurfaces based on graphene, black phosphorous, h-BN, gold/air or silver/air nanogratings39,40,41,42 (see Fig. 6a). We must emphasize that all of the experimental and theoretical studies thus far have focused on Purcell factor enhancements or the photonic spin-Hall effects. Here we propose hyperbolic metasurfaces to control many-body DDIs. Figure 6a shows the key difference from bulk hyperbolic media where a two dimensional resonance cone mediates giant long-range interactions due to in-plane hyperbolic dispersion (xy plane anisotropy). In Fig. 6b, we show an enhancement of the CLS Jdd versus angle θxy of atom B. The angle θxy is defined with respect to the optic axis that lies parallel to the interface, such that . A clear enhancement is seen along the resonance angle θR compared with the vacuum and the dielectric half-space cases. Furthermore, when the position of atom B lies along the resonance angle we find a clear order-of-magnitude enhancement in the CLS up to distances of 200 nm (Fig. 6b,c). Numerical simulations of the hyperbolic meta-surface were done using a dyadic Green function approach (Supplementary Note 2).

Figure 6: Super-Coulombic CLS above hyperbolic meta-surface.
Figure 6

CLS, Jdd, above hyperbolic metasurface with optic axis in the direction, calculated via dyadic Green function approach. Atom A and atom B are 2 nm above the interface. (a) Two-dimensional resonance cone on hyperbolic metasurfaces which causes giant in-plane long-range DDIs (b) CLS dependence on angle θxy of atom B for a fixed separation distance of r=λ/2=250 nm. The clear enhancement of the RDDI near the resonance angle θR is worth noting. (c) Separation distance dependence of CLS along the resonance angle θxy=θR. Inset shows giant FRET enhancement (>2,000) for separation distances of 100 nm in the metasurface plane.

To summarize, we have revealed a class of singular excited-state atom–atom interactions in hyperbolic media that arise from a fundamental modification of the Coulombic near-field. The experimental observation of such effects will require careful isolation of medium-induced cooperative interactions between atoms from the effect of independent atoms interacting with the hyperbolic medium. Preliminary results have shown signatures of such interactions between molecules via FRET43. Future work should also focus on understanding the intricate role of non-locality44,45 on DDIs in hyperbolic media. Our work motivates the search for defect centers in natural hyperbolic media such as h-BN, where the interaction is mediated by hyperbolic phonon–polaritons. It should also motivate the study of unique many-body physics in atomic lattice quantum metamaterials with hyperbolic response46. Our work also paves the way for studies of long-range entanglement and self-organization6. It is also a first step towards cold-atom studies with hyperbolic meta-surfaces exhibiting unique effects that are not found in photonic crystals, waveguides or cavities.


Atomic system

In the following, we only consider the interaction between two identical atoms for the case of RDDIs. We then consider the interaction between two non-identical atoms for the case of second-order DDIs such as FRET and the excited-state Casimir–Polder interaction. For the simulations, we took the transition frequency of atom A to be ωa/2π=500 THz, whereas the transition frequency of atom B was ωb/2π=460 THz.

In the study, we provided equations for the interaction between two two-level systems for illustrative purposes. The generalized interaction between two N-level atoms can be easily extended with the general perturbation results. Furthermore, it is noteworthy that h-BN is considered due its high-quality factors and its low-loss phonon–polaritonic nature. The super-Coulombic effect will occur even in the presence of rapid dispersion in the dielectric constant of h-BN as long as the emitter linewidths are not significantly broader than the Reststrahlen bands of h-BN where optically active hyperbolic phonon-polaritons are found. For our simulations, representative values of loss and dielectric constants have been chosen from recent experiments in the mid-infrared spectral range.

Perturbation theory

All DDIs can be calculated from the transition matrix element:

where the summation in the second- and higher-order terms runs over all possible intermediate states; the summation can be replaced by integration for the case of continuum states. The energy level shift of the initial state is then given by

where it is understood that the principal value is taken during the integration of continuum intermediate states. The probability transition rate from initial state to final state is given by Fermi’s Golden rule

where the summation runs over all initial and final states.

Resonant dipole–dipole interaction

We now consider the interaction between two identical atoms, labelled atom A and atom B, respectively. The probability transition rate between state and is found through equation (13) to give the CDR

Assuming the dipole moments of both atoms are oriented along the same direction, the total decay rate of two identical atoms will be γtot=γa±γdd, where γa is the bare spontaneous emission rate of atom A (or atom B). The initial state is and final state . It is noteworthy that represents the single-photon Fock state with position r and frequency ω.

The first-order dipole–dipole frequency shift of initial state is then found through evaluation of equation (12), which results in a resonant and off-resonant contribution , specified by


In the Letter, we only retain the resonant contributions (4) and (5), as they give rise to the super-Coulombic DDIs. The results agree with those of ref. 47.

Resonance energy transfer rate

Using equation (3), the resonance energy transfer rate between state and can be calculated to give

where we have taken and final state (ref. 48).

Excited state–ground state interaction

The excited-state Casimir–Polder potential is given by34

where the resonant component is

and off-resonant component is given by

is the isotropic electric polarizability of atom A in the kth energy eigenstate, defined as

Ground state–ground state interaction

The ground state–ground state Casimir–Polder potential is given by38

which is applicable in the retarded and non-retarded regimes. It is noteworthy that we have dropped the spatial coordinate dependence of the Green function in equations (19), (20) and (22).

It is worth noting that for the numerical calculation of the integrals, we considered an anisotropic medium with a Lorentz resonance parallel to the optic axis with parameters ωPz/2π=550 × 1012 Hz, ωTz/2π=450 × 1012 Hz and γz=0.01ωPz, and a Lorentz resonance perpendicular to the optic axis with parameters ωPx/2π=770 × 1012 Hz, ωTx/2π=600 × 1012 Hz and γz=0.01ωPx. The isotropic medium had the same relative permittivity as the x axis of the anisotropic medium.

Applicability of perturbation theory

It is noteworthy that the perturbative formalism used in this work is strictly applicable for the case of finite absorption with a sufficiently large interatomic separation distance. This is in agreement with our simulations for practical experimental systems such as plasmonic super-lattices and hyperbolic metasurfaces. For the case of low losses and extremely short separation distances, a non-perturbative treatment will be required to treat the dipole–dipole singularity in a self-consistent manner. It is also noteworthy that the presence of emitters do not alter the hyperbolic polaritonic branches in the weak coupling limit.

Green function in a uniaxial medium

The Green tensor is the unique solution to the homogeneous Helmholtz equation with permittivity tensor ,

and radiation condition G(r, r′; ω)=0 for |rr′|→∞. The coordinate-free form of the Green function is given by49

where we have fixed the spatial coordinate of the source at the origin, that is, r′=0. It is noteworthy that this Green function is only applicable when rr′, as we have excluded the singularity term that occurs when r=r′.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Cortes, C. L. et al. Super-Coulombic atom-atom interactions in hyperbolic media. Nat. Commun. 8, 14144 doi: 10.1038/ncomms14144 (2017).

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1.

    Quantum coherence and entanglement with ultracold atoms in optical lattices. Nature 453, 1016–1022 (2008).

  2. 2.

    et al. Superradiance in ultracold rydberg gases. Phys. Rev. A 75, 033802 (2007).

  3. 3.

    et al. Single-photon superradiance in cold atoms. Phys. Rev. A 90, 023848 (2014).

  4. 4.

    et al. Nanometer resolution and coherent optical dipole coupling of two individual molecules. Science 298, 385–389 (2002).

  5. 5.

    et al. Superradiance for atoms trapped along a photonic crystal waveguide. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 063601 (2015).

  6. 6.

    , , , & Subwavelength vacuum lattices and atom-atom interactions in two-dimensional photonic crystals. Nat. Photonics 9, 320–325 (2015).

  7. 7.

    et al. Coherent dipole-dipole coupling between two single rydberg atoms at an electrically-tuned forster resonance. Nat. Phys. 10, 914–917 (2014).

  8. 8.

    et al. Photon-mediated interactions between distant artificial atoms. Science 342, 1494–1496 (2013).

  9. 9.

    et al. Coupling superconducting qubits via a cavity bus. Nature 449, 443–447 (2007).

  10. 10.

    & Energy transfer across a metal film mediated by surface plasmon polaritons. Science 306, 1002–1005 (2004).

  11. 11.

    et al. Nanophotonic control of the frster resonance energy transfer efficiency. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 203601 (2012).

  12. 12.

    , & Quantum information with rydberg atoms. Rev. Modern Phys. 82, 2313 (2010).

  13. 13.

    , & Superconducting qubits: a short review. Preprint at (2004).

  14. 14.

    & Enhanced superradiance in epsilon-near-zero plasmonic channels. Phys. Rev. B 87, 201101 (2013).

  15. 15.

    , , & Experimental realization of an epsilon-near-zero metamate-rial at visible wavelengths. Nat. Photonics 7, 907–912 (2013).

  16. 16.

    , , & Resonance energy transfer and superradi-ance mediated by plasmonic nanowaveguides. Nano Lett. 10, 3129–3134 (2010).

  17. 17.

    & Large enhancement of forster resonance energy transfer on graphene platforms. Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 243112 (2013).

  18. 18.

    et al. Quantum information processing using quantum dot spins and cavity qed. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4204 (1999).

  19. 19.

    , & Trapping of single atoms in cavity qed. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4987 (1999).

  20. 20.

    , & Waveguide QED: many-body bound-state effects in coherent and fock-state scattering from a two-level system. Phys. Rev. A 82, 063816 (2010).

  21. 21.

    , , & A single-photon transistor using nanoscale surface plasmons. Nat. Phys. 3, 807–812 (2007).

  22. 22.

    Slow light in photonic crystals. Nat. Photonics 2, 465–473 (2008).

  23. 23.

    et al. Dissipation-driven generation of two-qubit entanglement mediated by plasmonic waveguides. Phys. Rev. B 84, 235306 (2011).

  24. 24.

    & Quantum optical properties of a dipole emitter coupled to an -near-zero nanoscale waveguide. Opt. Express 21, 32279–32290 (2013).

  25. 25.

    , & The searchlight effect in hyperbolic materials. Opt. Express 21, 14926–14942 (2013).

  26. 26.

    , , & Hyperbolic metamaterials. Nat. Photonics 7, 948–957 (2013).

  27. 27.

    , , & Quantum nanophotonics using hyperbolic metamaterials. J. Opt. 14, 063001 (2012).

  28. 28.

    , , , & Topological transitions in metamaterials. Science 336, 205–209 (2012).

  29. 29.

    et al. Sub-diffractional volume-confined polaritons in the natural hyperbolic material hexagonal boron nitride. Nat. Commun. 5, 5221 (2014).

  30. 30.

    et al. Graphene on hexagonal boron nitride as a tunable hyperbolic metamaterial. Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 682–686 (2015).

  31. 31.

    , , , & Quantum emission from hexagonal boron nitride monolayers. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 37–41 (2016).

  32. 32.

    et al. Characterization and manipulation of individual defects in insulating hexagonal boron nitride using scanning tunnelling microscopy. Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 949–953 (2015).

  33. 33.

    , & Qed in dispersing and absorbing media. Tech. Rep. (2000).

  34. 34.

    & Body-assisted Van der Waals interaction between excited atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 013201 (2015).

  35. 35.

    et al. Control of forster energy transfer in the vicinity of metallic surfaces and hyperbolic meta-materials. Farad. Discuss. 178, 395–412 (2015).

  36. 36.

    Collective forster energy transfer modified by a planar metallic mirror. Phys. Rev. B 92, 155418 (2015).

  37. 37.

    , , & Green function for hyperbolic media. Phys. Rev. A 86, 023848 (2012).

  38. 38.

    , , & Body-assisted van der waals interaction between two atoms. Phys. Rev. A 74, 042101 (2006).

  39. 39.

    & Optical hyperspace for plasmons: Dyakonov states in metamaterials. Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 221109 (2008).

  40. 40.

    et al. Visible-frequency hyperbolic metasur-face. Nature 522, 192–196 (2015).

  41. 41.

    , & Hyperbolic plasmons and topological transitions over uniaxial metasurfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 233901 (2015).

  42. 42.

    , , & Black phosphorus and two-dimensional hyperbolic materials: tunable surface plasmons, green function and complex-plane analysis. Preprint at (2015).

  43. 43.

    et al. in Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics FTh4D.1 (Optical Society of America (2016).

  44. 44.

    , & Hyperbolic metamaterials: nonlocal response regularizes broadband supersingularity. Phys. Rev. B 86, 205429 (2012).

  45. 45.

    , , & Nonlocal response of hyperbolic metasurfaces. Opt. Express 23, 29434–29448 (2015).

  46. 46.

    et al. Coherence-driven topological transition in quantum metamaterials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 165502 (2016).

  47. 47.

    , & Resonant dipole-dipole interaction in the presence of dispersing and absorbing surroundings. Phys. Rev. A 66, 063810 (2002).

  48. 48.

    , & Intermolecular energy transfer in the presence of dispersing and absorbing media. Phys. Rev. A 65, 043813 (2002).

  49. 49.

    Theory of electromagnetic waves a coordinate-free approach McGraw-Hill Book Company (1983).

Download references


Research was funded by the National Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) as well as the National Science Foundation (NSF).

Author information


  1. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2V4

    • Cristian L. Cortes
    •  & Zubin Jacob
  2. Birck Nanotechnology Center and Purdue Quantum Center, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Purdue University, 1205 West State Street, West Lafayette, Indiana 47906, USA

    • Cristian L. Cortes
    •  & Zubin Jacob


  1. Search for Cristian L. Cortes in:

  2. Search for Zubin Jacob in:


C.L.C developed the theoretical formalism, performed the analytic calculations and performed the numerical simulations. Both authors contributed to the final version of the manuscript. Z.J supervised the project.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Cristian L. Cortes or Zubin Jacob.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Figure 1, Supplementary Table 1, Supplementary Notes 1-2 and Supplementary References.

About this article

Publication history






By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.