Tumour metastasis, the spread of cancer cells from the original tumour site followed by growth of secondary tumours at distant organs, is the primary cause of cancer-related deaths and remains poorly understood. Here we demonstrate that inhibition of CDK4/6 blocks breast tumour metastasis in the triple-negative breast cancer model, without affecting tumour growth. Mechanistically, we identify a deubiquitinase, DUB3, as a target of CDK4/6; CDK4/6-mediated activation of DUB3 is essential to deubiquitinate and stabilize SNAIL1, a key factor promoting epithelial–mesenchymal transition and breast cancer metastasis. Overall, our study establishes the CDK4/6–DUB3 axis as an important regulatory mechanism of breast cancer metastasis and provides a rationale for potential therapeutic interventions in the treatment of breast cancer metastasis.
Tumour metastasis, the spread of cancer cells to distant vital organs, causes the majority of human cancer-related deaths1,2,3,4,5,6. Metastasis occurs through a complex multistep process including local invasion, intravasation, transport, extravasation and colonization, which requires the concerted action of many genes and signal pathways7,8,9,10,11,12,13. Epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a highly conserved cellular process in which polarized, immobile epithelial cells are converted to migratory mesenchymal cells14; EMT has been accepted as a critical process during embryogenesis15,16. Numerous studies have clearly demonstrated the importance of EMT in tissue regeneration, tumour progression and metastasis13,16,17,18,19, while some studies suggest a major role of EMT in chemoresistance20,21,22,23,24. Loss of the cell adhesion molecule E-cadherin is a functional event of EMT that reinforces the destabilization of adherent junctions. Loss of E-cadherin and other essential events in the EMT process alter the phenotype of epithelial cells from noninvasive to invasive16,25. Downregulation of E-cadherin involves several mechanisms, such as transcriptional repression, mutation and increased cleavage or degradation of E-cadherin1,16. The transcription factor SNAIL1 directly represses the expression of CDH1, the gene encoding E-cadherin, and activates the expression of invasion-associated genes, thereby promoting EMT26,27,28. For example, Peinado et al.29 demonstrated that SNAIL1 interacts with a co-repressor complex SIN3A, and histone deacetylases HDAC1 and HDAC2, to repress E-cadherin expression by modifying local chromatin structure. SNAIL1 also interacts with G9a, a major euchromatin methyltransferase responsible for H3K9me2, and recruits G9a and DNA methyltransferases to the E-cadherin promoter for DNA methylation30.
Expression of SNAIL1 is tightly regulated at the transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels. TGFβ, NOTCH and WNT pathways can transcriptionally increase SNAIL1 expression by directly binding to the SNAIL1 promoter, thus inducing EMT in mammalian cells28,31,32. As a highly unstable protein, SNAIL1 is post-translationally degraded through the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Several E3 ubiquitin ligases, including FBXL14, FBXW1 and FBXO11, have been shown to induce SNAIL1 ubiquitination and degradation33,34,35. However, whether and how SNAIL1 is stabilized post-translationally is unclear. Thus, the identification of the signalling pathway controlling SNAIL1 stabilization will provide important clues for potential therapeutic targets of cancer metastasis. Here we demonstrate CDK4/6 inhibition blocks breast tumour metastasis without affecting tumour growth. Furthermore, we identify deubiquitinating enzyme 3 (DUB3) as a new target of CDK4/6; CDK4/6-mediated activation in DUB3 is essential to deubiquitinate and stabilize SNAIL1. Overall, our study demonstrates the importance of CDK4/6–DUB3 axis in regulating breast cancer metastasis and provides a rationale for potential therapeutic interventions in the treatment of breast cancer metastasis.
CDK4/6 inhibitor PD0332991 decreases human cancer metastasis
A specific inhibitor of CDK4/6, PD0332991 (palbociclib), is a potent anti-proliferative agent in multiple cancer cells36,37,38. More recently, the US Food and Drug Administration granted accelerated approval for palbociclib for use in combination with letrozole for the treatment of postmenopausal women with oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancers39,40. Tumours that are ER negative, progesterone receptor negative and HER2 negative, also known as triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs), usually grow the fastest and are more metastatic. In a previous study, compared with ER-positive breast cancer lines, TNBCs were more resistant to PD0332991 (ref. 36). In our study, PD0332991 treatment inhibited cell proliferation of T47D cells, but had no effect on cell proliferation of TNBC cell lines, BT-549 and MDA-MB-231 (Supplementary Fig. 1a–c). Surprisingly, PD0332991 treatment markedly reduced cell migration of MDA-MB-231 in vitro (Fig. 1a), suggesting a potential role of CDK4/6 inhibitor in blocking cell metastasis. PD0332991 was further tested in a patient-derived xenograft model generated from a triple-negative high-grade invasive ductal carcinoma (from the Breast Cancer Genome-Guided Therapy study (BEAUTY) in Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota). Immunodeficient mice implanted with human breast tumour biopsy sample HCI001 were found to have liver, lung and ovary metastases, reflecting the metastatic pattern in the donor patient. Administration of PD0332991 did not affect the growth of primary tumour as shown in Fig. 1b and Supplementary Fig. 1d. Strikingly, we found that PD0332991 could significantly decrease liver (12.5% versus 75%) and lung (25% versus 75%) metastases compared with the saline group (Fig. 1c–e,f–h). We also investigated PD0332991 function in a xenograft metastasis model. MDA-MB-231 cells were injected into the mammary fat pad of immunodeficient mice. When tumours reached 400 mm3 in size, we removed the primary tumours and treated these mice with either vehicle or PD0332991 for an additional 12 weeks to examine lung metastases. We found that the administration of PD0332991 markedly suppressed lung colonization in these mice, as determined by the number of metastatic lung nodules (Supplementary Fig. 1e,f). These results demonstrate that the CDK4/6 inhibitor PD0332991 can inhibit TNBC metastasis without affecting tumour growth in the two models we tested. This finding could potentially broaden the use of CDK4/6 inhibitor in the treatment of TNBC metastasis.
Numerous studies have clearly demonstrated that EMT is essential for tumour progression and metastasis. As shown in Fig. 1i, PD0332991 treatment decreased vimentin (mesenchymal marker) protein level, while increasing E-cadherin (epithelial marker) protein level in MDA-MB-231. Interestingly, the protein level of SNAIL1, a key factor in EMT, decreased upon PD0332991 treatment (Fig. 1i), which could be rescued by the proteasome inhibitor MG-132 (Fig. 1j,k). These results suggest that CDK4/6 inhibition regulates SNAIL1 protein level in a proteasome dependent manner. Furthermore, PD0332991 treatment markedly decreased the SNAIL1 protein stability (Fig. 1l,m). PD0332991 treatment increased the ubiquitination of SNAIL1 (Fig. 1n,o). Previous studies suggested that several E3 ubiquitin ligases including FBXL14, FBXW1 and FBXO11 regulate SNAIL1 ubiquitination and degradation33,34,35. Neither the direct interaction between CDK4/6 and SNAIL1 (Supplementary Fig. 1g) nor CDK4/6-mediated phosphorylation of SNAIL1 were detected (Supplementary Fig. 1h). These results indicate a potential unidentified factor mediates CDK4/6’s regulation of SNAIL1.
Identification of deubiquitinases for SNAIL1
To identify the potential linker between CDK4/6 and SNAIL1, we used MDA-MB-231 cells stably expressing FLAG-SNAIL1 to perform tandem affinity purification and mass spectrometry analysis. In addition to known SNAIL1 interacting proteins such as ATM, DNMT1 and CSNK2A1 (refs 30, 41, 42), we identified several DUBs, including USP7, USP10, USP11 and DUB3, as major SNAIL1-associated proteins (Fig. 2a). Although SNAIL1 interacted with several DUBs (Supplementary Fig. 2a–d), only overexpression of DUB3, but not USP7, USP10 or USP11, markedly increased the protein level of SNAIL1 in MDA-MB-231 (Fig. 2b). We confirmed the endogenous SNAIL1–DUB3 interaction by co-immunoprecipitation in both MDA-MB-231 and BT-549 cells (Fig. 2c,d; Supplementary Fig. 2e,f). As shown in Fig. 2c and Supplementary Fig. 2e, SNAIL1 co-immunoprecipitated with DUB3. Reciprocal immunoprecipitation with DUB3 antibodies also brought down SNAIL1 (Fig. 2d; Supplementary Fig. 2f). Moreover, GST-DUB3 could interact with recombinant His-SNAIL1 in vitro, indicating a direct interaction between DUB3 and SNAIL1 (Fig. 2e).
DUB3 deubiquitinates and stabilizes SNAIL1
The interaction of DUB3 and SNAIL1 prompted us to examine a potential role for DUB3 in the regulation of SNAIL1 stability and function. First, DUB3 and SNAIL1 protein levels were examined in several luminal- and basal-like breast cancer cell lines. As shown in Fig. 3a, DUB3 and SNAIL1 protein levels are higher in basal-like breast cancer cell lines. To directly test the function of DUB3 on endogenous SNAIL1 protein stability, we knocked down DUB3 with its specific short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) in MDA-MB-231. Depletion of DUB3 significantly decreased SNAIL1 protein level (Fig. 3b). The regulation of SNAIL1 protein stability by DUB3 was not at the level of transcription since no apparent difference of SNAIL1 mRNA level was detected in cells stably expressing control and DUB3 shRNAs (Fig. 3c). On the other hand, MG-132 treatment could rescue the decreased SNAIL1 protein level in cells depleted of DUB3 (Fig. 3d). Moreover, overexpression of wild-type (WT) DUB3, but not the catalytically inactive C89S mutant in both MCF-7 and T47D cells, increased SNAIL1 protein level (Fig. 3e). Furthermore, SNAIL1 protein was less stable in cells depleted of DUB3 in a cycloheximide pulse-chase assay (Fig. 3f,g). These results suggest that DUB3 regulates SNAIL1 stability. To further investigate whether DUB3 functions as a bona fide DUB that deubiquitinates SNAIL1, we performed a deubiquitination assay by cotransfecting cells with WT DUB3 or the C89S mutant. A significant decrease of polyubiquitylated SNAIL1 protein was observed in cells transfected with WT DUB3, whereas the expression of C89S mutant was not able to decrease SNAIL1 ubiquitination (Fig. 3h). In addition, WT DUB3, but not the C89S mutant, markedly decreased SNAIL1 ubiquitination in vitro (Fig. 3i). On the other hand, depletion of DUB3 significantly increased SNAIL1 ubiquitination (Fig. 3j; Supplementary Fig. 3a). When we examined the linkage of SNAIL1 ubiquitination, we found that SNAIL1 was ubiquitinated through both K48- and K63-specific chains (Supplementary Fig. 3b). In addition, we found that DUB3 regulates only K48, but not K63 ubiquitin chains (Supplementary Fig. 3c,d). Taken together, our results suggest that DUB3 is a bona fide DUB targeting SNAIL1 protein for deubiquitination and stabilization.
DUB3 regulates EMT through SNAIL1
Accumulating experimental and clinical evidences demonstrated that SNAIL1 promotes EMT. To investigate the potential function of DUB3 in this process, we overexpressed DUB3 in two luminal breast cancer cell lines, MCF-7 and T47D. Expression of WT DUB3 resulted in decreased E-cadherin (epithelial marker) expression, increased vimentin (mesenchymal marker) expression and converted luminal cells into basal-like phenotype (Fig. 4a,b). Furthermore, the effect of DUB3 overexpression on EMT was not observed in cells transfected with SNAIL1 shRNA, suggesting that DUB3 functions in promoting basal-like phenotype conversion through SNAIL1 (Fig. 4a,b). Collectively, these results suggest that DUB3 regulates EMT by stabilizing SNAIL1.
DUB3 regulates cell migration and cancer metastasis
Repression of E-cadherin expression by SNAIL1 or other EMT factors is one of the critical events in EMT induction and cancer metastasis1,28,43. Since DUB3 deubiquitinates and stabilizes SNAIL1 and consequently decreases E-cadherin expression, we hypothesized that DUB3 is critical for breast cancer cell migration and invasion in vitro. Depletion of DUB3 significantly inhibited the migratory ability and invasiveness of MDA-MB-231 cells (Fig. 4c–f), although it did not affect cell proliferation (Supplementary Fig. 4a,b). However, overexpression of SNAIL1 in cells rescued the decreased migratory ability induced by depletion of DUB3 (Supplementary Fig. 4c–e). Altogether, these results indicate that SNAIL1 is an important factor for DUB3’s effect on migration.
We further investigated DUB3 function in a xenograft metastasis model. We found that knockdown of DUB3 in MDA-MB-231 cells markedly suppresses lung colonization in these mice, as determined by intensity of bioluminescence (Fig. 4g,h) and number of lung nodules present (Fig. 4i,j). Furthermore, overexpression of SNAIL1 in cells with DUB3 depletion significantly increased lung colonization compared with those depleted of DUB3, as determined by intensity of bioluminescence (Supplementary Fig. 4f,g) and number of lung nodules present (Supplementary Fig. 4h). Together, our results demonstrate that DUB3 is critical for cell migration, invasion and lung colonization through stabilizing SNAIL1.
DUB3 is positively correlated to SNAIL1 in breast cancers
Since SNAIL1 plays a critical role in human breast carcinoma metastasis33,43,44 and DUB3 stabilizes SNAIL1 by deubiquitinating SNAIL1, it is possible that DUB3 also facilitates breast carcinoma metastasis. Our results (shown in Fig. 4 and Supplementary Fig. 4) demonstrate DUB3’s ability to increase breast cancer cell migration and metastasis by targeting SNAIL1, thereby supporting our hypothesis that DUB3 promotes breast carcinoma metastasis in patients. To further test this hypothesis, we examined the expression of DUB3 and SNAIL1 in breast cancer tissue samples by using breast cancer tissue microarray. Notably, high DUB3 protein expression positively correlated with metastatic carcinoma (P<0.0001, R=0.347) (Supplementary Fig. 5a,b). High SNAIL1 protein expression was also positively correlated with metastatic carcinoma (P<0.0001, R=0.344; Supplementary Fig. 5a,c). Importantly, DUB3 expression positively correlated with SNAIL1 protein expression in metastatic carcinoma (Supplementary Fig. 5d). In addition, in another tissue array with known breast cancer subtypes, high protein expressions of DUB3 and SNAIL1 were both positively correlated with basal-like breast cancer type (Supplementary Fig. 5e,f), which is consistent with the role of DUB3 in promoting basal-like phenotype conversion we observed in Fig. 4a,b. These results suggest that DUB3 and SNAIL1 are positively correlated in metastatic breast carcinoma.
CDK4/6 phosphorylates Ser41 of DUB3
Our results demonstrate that both CDK4/6 and DUB3 regulate EMT and metastasis through stabilizing SNAIL1. We speculated that DUB3 might be the missing link between CDK4/6 and SNAIL1. Interestingly, we found that PD0332991 could not further induce decrease of SNAIL1 protein level in DUB3 knockdown cells, suggesting that CDK4/6 may regulate SNAIL1 in a DUB3-dependent manner (Fig. 5a). The interaction between CDK4/6 and DUB3 was also detected by endogenous co-immunoprecipitation and in vitro pull down (Fig. 5b,c). We hypothesized that CDK4/6 could phosphorylate DUB3. Indeed, we found that CDK4/6 could phosphorylate DUB3 in vitro (Supplementary Fig. 6a). To further identify the potential phosphorylation sites in DUB3, we generated MDA-MB-231 cells stably expressing FLAG-DUB3 to perform tandem affinity purification and mass spectrometry analysis of potential phosphorylation events in DUB3. We found that Ser41 is a major phosphorylation site on DUB3, which matches with a CDK consensus motif (Supplementary Fig. 6b). To test whether S41 is a CDK4/6 phosphorylation site, GST-fused WT DUB3 and S41A mutants were incubated with active CDK4 or CDK6 and an in vitro kinase assay was performed. As shown in Fig. 5d, mutation at S41 abolished CDK4/6-mediated phosphorylation of DUB3 in vitro. A phospho-Ser41-specific antibody was generated to further study the phosphorylation of Ser41 in cells. HEK293T cells were transfected with DUB3 WT or the S41A mutant. As shown in Fig. 5e, WT DUB3 was phosphorylated in cells. However, S41A mutation completely abrogated the phosphorylation of DUB3 at this site, indicating the specificity of this antibody. We next tested CDK4/6-mediated phosphorylation of DUB3 in cells. We found that CDK4/6 inhibition markedly reduces the phosphorylation of DUB3 at Ser41 (Fig. 5f). Furthermore, depletion of CDK4 or CDK6 in cells only partially decreased the phosphorylation of DUB3, while double knockdown of CDK4 and CDK6 almost completely abrogated DUB3 phosphorylation (Fig. 5g). In addition, depletion of CDK4 or CDK6 alone in cells only partially decreased SNAIL1, while double knockdown of CDK4 and CDK6 decreased SNAIL1 more markedly (Fig. 5h). Interestingly, CDK1 also phosphorylated DUB3 at Ser41 in vitro and the treatment of Roscovitine could decrease the phosphorylation of DUB3 (Supplementary Fig. 7a,b). Thus, the potential function of CDK1 inhibition on EMT and breast cancer metastasis warrants further investigation. To assess whether PD0332991 actions are mediated through CDK4/6–DUB3–SNAIL1 axis, we expressed WT DUB3, S41A or S41D mutants in cells depleted of endogenous DUB3 and then treated these cells with either vehicle or PD0332991. We found that PD0332991 induces decrease in SNAIL1 protein level only in WT DUB3 reconstituted cells but not in cells reconstituted with S41A or S41D mutants (Fig. 5i). These findings provide evidence that Ser41 is the major CDK4/6-mediated phosphorylation site on DUB3, which in turn regulates SNAIL1 protein level.
CDK4/6 phosphorylates and activates DUB3
Next, we investigated whether CDK4/6-mediated phosphorylation affects DUB3 activity. The deubiquitinase activity of WT DUB3 and S41A or S41D mutants towards fluorogenic substrate, Ub-AMC, were measured. Compared with the S41A mutant, WT and the S41D mutant showed much higher activity towards Ub-AMC (Supplementary Fig. 8a,b). This result suggests that S41 phosphorylation is essential for the deubiquitinase activity of DUB3. We next tested how CDK4/6 and S41 phosphorylation of DUB3 affects SNAIL1 ubiquitination. We transfected cells with FLAG-DUB3 and HA-SNAIL1, treated cells with vehicle or CDK4/6 inhibitor PD0332991, and SNAIL1 ubiquitination was determined. As shown in Fig. 6a, SNAIL1 ubiquitination was stronger in cells treated with PD0332991 compared to vehicle, suggesting that CDK4/6 activity is important for the catalytic activity of DUB3. We further tested whether phosphorylation of S41 on DUB3 could affect the ubiquitination of SNAIL1 in cells. As shown in Fig. 6b,c, overexpression of both WT and S41D mutant DUB3 in cells efficiently decreased the ubiquitination of SNAIL1; however, S41A mutant failed to do so. Collectively, these results suggest that phosphorylation of S41 is important for the deubiquitinase activity of DUB3 towards SNAIL1. We further tested whether phosphorylation of S41 on DUB3 could affect the protein level of SNAIL1 in cells. We reconstituted shRNA-resistant WT, S41A and S41D DUB3 mutants in cells depleted of endogenous DUB3 and checked SNAIL1 level. As shown in Fig. 6d, DUB3 knockdown efficiently decreased SNAIL1 protein level. WT DUB3 and the S41D mutant could rescue SNAIL1 protein level, while the S41A mutant failed to do so. Moreover, depletion of DUB3 greatly inhibited the migratory ability of MDA-MB-231 cells. Cells reconstituted with WT DUB3 and the S41D mutant, but not the S41A mutant could rescue this phenotype (Fig. 6e,f). Results from the metastasis model showed that the reconstitution of WT DUB3 and the S41D mutant in MDA-MB-231 cells stably expressing DUB3 shRNA causes stronger lung colonization than that of S41A mutant, as determined by the number of lung nodules (Fig. 6g) and by intensity of bioluminescence (Supplementary Fig. 8c,d). These results establish that CDK4/6-mediated phosphorylation of DUB3 is important for DUB3 activity and SNAIL1 stability.
Overall, our study demonstrates that the CDK4/6–DUB3 axis functions as an important regulatory mechanism of breast cancer metastasis and provides a potential therapeutic approach in the management of breast cancer metastasis (Fig. 6h).
Despite advances in diagnosis and treatment, cancer metastasis is the most common cause of human cancer-related deaths and remains poorly understood. Metastasis occurs through a complex multistep process and requires the concerted action of many genes and signalling pathways7,8. In the past 20 years, accumulated experimental and clinical studies have demonstrated the crucial role of EMT in metastasis8,9,17,18,45,46,47,48,49. Thus, identification and characterization of the genes that regulate metastasis and the associated molecular mechanisms will lead to the development of new markers and potential therapeutic targets for cancer metastasis.
The DUB3 has been reported to regulate DNA damage response by controlling H2AX ubiquitination50. Moreover, overexpression DUB3 has oncogenic potential by stabilizing the Cdc25A protein phosphatase in a subset of human breast cancers and couples G1/S checkpoint to pluripotency in mouse embryonic stem cells51,52. Here our studies indicate that DUB3 is crucial to induce EMT through the stabilization of SNAIL1 protein in breast cancer. In a subset of human breast cancer cell lines and patient tumour samples, the status of DUB3 is correlated with SNAIL1 expression (Fig. 3; Supplementary Fig. 5). Interestingly, elevated DUB3 and SNAIL1 expression are only detected in basal-like type but not luminal-type breast cancer cell lines. Furthermore, the correlation between DUB3 and SNAIL1 only exists in metastatic breast carcinoma but not in non-metastatic breast carcinoma (Supplementary Fig. 5). Thus, it will be important to elucidate how DUB3 expression is under regulatory control in breast cancer metastasis. Curiously, the DUB3 gene, a part of the highly polymorphic RS447 megasatellite sequence, is induced by cytokines interleukin (IL-)4 and IL-6 in certain mammalian cells53,54. IL-6 has been demonstrated to repress E-cadherin expression, promote EMT, invasion and metastasis in several different cancer types including breast cancer and colorectal cancer55,56. Given the link between cytokines and cancer metastasis, it will be intriguing to determine the regulatory mechanisms of DUB3 activation or expression in the cytokine context. SNAIL1 is also stabilized by inflammatory cytokines including IL-6 and tumour necrosis factor-α, in which activation of the nuclear factor-κB pathway is required to block the ubiquitination and degradation of SNAIL1 (ref. 43). Thus, the potential involvement of DUB3-mediated stabilization of SNAIL1 in inflammation-induced breast cancer metastasis is an interesting avenue that warrants further investigation.
Interestingly, we found that DUB3 is under regulatory control of CDK4/6 at the post-translational level. We demonstrate that phosphorylation of DUB3 on Ser41 is critical for activation of the enzymatic function. S41A mutant decreases DUB3 catalytic activity towards the fluorogenic substrate, Ub-AMC. Ser41 is located in an unstructured region of the protein, which is outside of the ubiquitin hydrolase domain. There are several reports implicating the regulatory phosphorylation of DUBs57,58. These post-translational modifications may activate or modulate regulatory subunits, which can control DUB activity and possibly substrate specificity. In addition, the phosphorylation modification of DUBs may trigger structural changes and affect ubiquitin recognition. Further detailed structural studies on DUB3 should be carried out to better understand the role of phosphorylation on its catalytic activity. Although we show that CDK4/6-mediated Ser41 phosphorylation is essential for DUB3 activation, phosphorylation of the other potential sites should be further investigated.
The mechanisms controlling metastasis can be regulated independently from primary tumour development. Recent studies using CDK4/6 inhibitors establish these cell cycle kinases as anti-cancer drug targets59,60. More recently, the Food and Drug Administration granted accelerated approval to the specific inhibitor of CDK 4/6, palbociclib (PD0332991), for use in combination with letrozole for the treatment of postmenopausal women with ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer39,40. TNBCs usually grow the fastest and are more metastatic36. Our study reveals a potential use of CDK4/6 inhibitor in the treatment of TNBC metastasis. Consistent with previous studies, PD0332991 does not affect the growth of the primary tumour derived from human TNBC samples. Instead, PD0332991 induces the inactivation of DUB3, destablization of SNAIL1 protein and decrease in cell migration, thereby reducing metastasis in xenograft models, both from a breast cancer patient and a TNBC cell line. Given the facts that TNBC is particularly aggressive and more likely to metastasize, our study might introduce a new paradigm in the treatment of TNBC metastasis using CDK4/6 inhibitor. However, we only tested two TNBC breast cancer models here. The effect of CDK4/6 inhibitor in more TNBC models and other cancers needs to be further tested.
Cell culture, plasmids and antibodies
293T, MDA-MB-231, BT-549, MCF-7, T47D cells and other lines were purchased from American Type Culture Collection. Identities of all cell lines were confirmed by the medical genome facility at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, using short tandem repeat profiling upon receipt. Periodic Hoechst 33258 staining assays in these cells were performed to detect mycoplasma contamination.
DUB3 and SNAIL1 were cloned into pIRES-EGFP, pCMV-HA, pLV.3-FLAG, pGEX4T-1 and PET28A vectors. All site mutants were generated by site-directed mutagenesis (Stratagene) and verified by sequencing. DUB3, SNAIL1, CDK4 and CDK6 shRNAs were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co. The shRNA targeting sequences for CDK4 and CDK6 shRNAs are 5′-GAGATTACTTTGCTGCCTTAA-3′ and 5′-CAGATGTTGATCAACTAGGAA-3′, respectively. The sequences for SNAIL1 shRNA is 5′-CCAGGCTCGAAAGGCCTTCAA-3′. The sequences for DUB3 shRNAs are 5′-CACAAGCAGGtAGATCATCAC-3′ and 5′-GCAGGAAGATGCCCATGAATT-3′.
Antibodies against SNAIL1 (3895, dilution: 1:500), E-cadherin (14472, dilution: 1:1,000), N-cadherin (14215, dilution: 1:1,000), Vimentin (5741, dilution: 1:1,000), CDK substrate antibody (9477, dilution: 1:500) and Rb (9309, dilution: 1:1,000) were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. Anti-FLAG (m2, dilution: 1:1,000), anti-HA (H3663, dilution: 1:1,000), anti-Myc (SAB4700447, dilution: 1:1,000) and anti-β-actin (A1978, dilution: 1:5,000) antibodies were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co. Ubiquitin, CDK4 (sc-23896, dilution: 1:500) and CDK6 (sc-7961, dilution: 1:500) antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. Antibodies used for immunohistochemistry against SNAIL1 (ab135708, dilution: 1:50) and DUB3 (ab129931, dilution: 1:50) were purchased from Abcam. Rabbit anti-pSer41 (dilution: 1:100) was generated by immunizing rabbits with phospho-peptide, and then affinity-purified. Western blot was performed by using antibodies listed above. Uncropped scans of western blots were presented in Supplementary Figs 9–11.
Patient-derived xenograft model
A patient-derived xenograft model (HCI001) was generated from an oestrogen receptor-negative, progesterone receptor-negative, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (ER−/PR−/HER2−) high-grade invasive ductal carcinoma by the Breast Cancer Genome-Guided Therapy study (BEAUTY) in Mayo Clinic (A17713). Metastasis in immunodeficient mice implanted with human breast tumour biopsy sample HCI001 was found in the liver, lung as well as ovary reflecting the metastatic pattern in the donor patient. In brief, freshly operated human breast tumour biopsy samples were implanted in the flank of female immunodeficient NSG (NOD.Cg-Prkdcscid Il2rgtm1Wjl/SzJ) mice. When tumour size reached 1,000 mm3, mice were killed and tumour fragments (3 mm3) were re-transplanted into mammary fat pads of additional mice. Passage 3 tumours were used to test the effect of PD0332991 on metastasis. When primary tumours reached 100–150 mm3, mice were divided into two groups by stratified randomization and treated either with saline (n=8) or PD0332991 (150 mg kg−1 daily, PO (oral administration), n=8) for an additional 5 weeks. Tumour volumes were measured once per week. After mice were killed, and lung and liver metastatic nodules were examined macroscopically or detected in paraffin-embedded sections stained with haematoxylin–eosin. Data were analysed using Student’s t-test. A P value <0.05 was considered significant. Mice were subjected to euthanasia if they displayed pain or distress, such as lethargy, lying down, not eating or drinking, weight loss >10% body weight or difficulty breathing. According to the blinding procedures, two people as a group performed all the mice experiments. One person performed the experiments and another one totally blinded to the experiment group measured the tumour volume and weight, number of lung and liver nodules, and analysed the data.
Denaturating Ni-NTA pulldown
Transiently transfected or virus infected cells were collected and pellets were washed once in PBS. Cells were lysed in 8 M urea, 0.1 M NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl and 0.01 M Tris (pH 8.0). Lysates were briefly sonicated to shear DNA and incubated with Ni-NTA agarose beads (Qiagen) for 1–2 h at room temperature. Beads were washed five times with 8 M urea, 0.1 M NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl and 0.01 M Tris (pH 8.0). Input and beads were boiled in loading buffer and subjected to SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and immunoblotting.
Denaturing immunoprecipitation for ubiquitination
The cells were lysed in 100 μl 62.5 mM Tris-HCl (PH 6.8), 2% SDS, 10% glycerol, 20 mM NEM and 1 mM iodoacetamide, boiled for 15 min, diluted 10 times with NETN buffer containing protease inhibitors, 20 mM NEM and 1 mM iodoacetamide and centrifuged to remove cell debris. The cell extracts were subjected to immunoprecipitation with the indicated antibodies, and blotted as indicated.
Cells were seeded onto glass coverslips for the experiment. Cells were washed with PBS, fixed with 4% formaldehyde for 10 min, permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 5 min, blocked with 5% goat serum for 1 h, incubated with primary antibodies for 1 h and then with secondary antibodies. The antibodies used in the immunofluorescence staining were E-cadherin (1:200; Cell Signaling) and vimentin (1:500; Cell Signaling). Localization of E-cadherin and vimentin were visualized by confocal microscopy.
For cell migration, invasion and proliferation experiments, data are represented as the mean±s.d. of three independent experiments. In the animal study, data are represented as the mean±s.d. of eight mice. Statistical analyses were performed with the Student’s t-test, Fisher exact test, analsysi of variance or χ2-test. Statistical significance is represented in figures by: #P<0.05; ##P<0.01.
All data generated or analysed during this study are available within the article and Supplementary Files, or available from the authors upon request.
How to cite this article: Liu, T. et al. CDK4/6-dependent activation of DUB3 regulates cancer metastasis through SNAIL1. Nat. Commun. 8, 13923 doi: 10.1038/ncomms13923 (2017).
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Bacac, M. & Stamenkovic, I. Metastatic cancer cell. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 3, 221–247 (2008).
Valastyan, S. & Weinberg, R. A. Tumor metastasis: molecular insights and evolving paradigms. Cell 147, 275–292 (2011).
Chaffer, C. L. & Weinberg, R. A. A perspective on cancer cell metastasis. Science 331, 1559–1564 (2011).
Gupta, P. B., Mani, S., Yang, J., Hartwell, K. & Weinberg, R. A. The evolving portrait of cancer metastasis. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 70, 291–297 (2005).
Thiery, J. P. Metastasis: alone or together? Curr. Biol. 19, R1121–R1123 (2009).
Braun, S. et al. A pooled analysis of bone marrow micrometastasis in breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 353, 793–802 (2005).
Chiang, A. C. & Massague, J. Molecular basis of metastasis. N. Engl. J. Med. 359, 2814–2823 (2008).
Tsai, J. H. & Yang, J. Epithelial-mesenchymal plasticity in carcinoma metastasis. Genes Dev. 27, 2192–2206 (2013).
Kang, Y. & Massague, J. Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions: twist in development and metastasis. Cell 118, 277–279 (2004).
Chaffer, C. L. & Weinberg, R. A. How does multistep tumorigenesis really proceed? Cancer Discov. 5, 22–24 (2015).
Kalluri, R. & Weinberg, R. A. The basics of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. J. Clin. Invest. 119, 1420–1428 (2009).
Polyak, K. & Weinberg, R. A. Transitions between epithelial and mesenchymal states: acquisition of malignant and stem cell traits. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 9, 265–273 (2009).
Yang, J. & Weinberg, R. A. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition: at the crossroads of development and tumor metastasis. Dev. Cell 14, 818–829 (2008).
Nieto, M. A., Huang, R. Y., Jackson, R. A. & Thiery, J. P. Emt: 2016. Cell 166, 21–45 (2016).
Hay, E. D. An overview of epithelio-mesenchymal transformation. Acta Anat. 154, 8–20 (1995).
Thiery, J. P. Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in tumour progression. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2, 442–454 (2002).
Thiery, J. P., Acloque, H., Huang, R. Y. & Nieto, M. A. Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in development and disease. Cell 139, 871–890 (2009).
Turley, E. A., Veiseh, M., Radisky, D. C. & Bissell, M. J. Mechanisms of disease: epithelial-mesenchymal transition--does cellular plasticity fuel neoplastic progression? Nat. Clin. Pract. Oncol. 5, 280–290 (2008).
Thiery, J. P. & Sleeman, J. P. Complex networks orchestrate epithelial-mesenchymal transitions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7, 131–142 (2006).
Fischer, K. R. et al. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition is not required for lung metastasis but contributes to chemoresistance. Nature 527, 472–476 (2015).
Zheng, X. et al. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition is dispensable for metastasis but induces chemoresistance in pancreatic cancer. Nature 527, 525–530 (2015).
Feng, Y. X. et al. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition activates PERK-eIF2alpha and sensitizes cells to endoplasmic reticulum stress. Cancer Discov. 4, 702–715 (2014).
Davis, F. M., Stewart, T. A., Thompson, E. W. & Monteith, G. R. Targeting EMT in cancer: opportunities for pharmacological intervention. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 35, 479–488 (2014).
Vega, S. et al. Snail blocks the cell cycle and confers resistance to cell death. Genes Dev. 18, 1131–1143 (2004).
Takeichi, M. Cadherin cell adhesion receptors as a morphogenetic regulator. Science 251, 1451–1455 (1991).
Batlle, E. et al. The transcription factor snail is a repressor of E-cadherin gene expression in epithelial tumour cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 2, 84–89 (2000).
Cano, A. et al. The transcription factor snail controls epithelial-mesenchymal transitions by repressing E-cadherin expression. Nat. Cell Biol. 2, 76–83 (2000).
Lamouille, S., Xu, J. & Derynck, R. Molecular mechanisms of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15, 178–196 (2014).
Peinado, H., Ballestar, E., Esteller, M. & Cano, A. Snail mediates E-cadherin repression by the recruitment of the Sin3A/histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1)/HDAC2 complex. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 306–319 (2004).
Dong, C. et al. G9a interacts with Snail and is critical for Snail-mediated E-cadherin repression in human breast cancer. J. Clin. Invest. 122, 1469–1486 (2012).
Peinado, H., Olmeda, D. & Cano, A. Snail, Zeb and bHLH factors in tumour progression: an alliance against the epithelial phenotype? Nat. Rev. Cancer 7, 415–428 (2007).
de Herreros, A. G., Peiro, S., Nassour, M. & Savagner, P. Snail family regulation and epithelial mesenchymal transitions in breast cancer progression. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia 15, 135–147 (2010).
Zheng, H. et al. PKD1 phosphorylation-dependent degradation of SNAIL by SCF-FBXO11 regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition and metastasis. Cancer Cell 26, 358–373 (2014).
Vinas-Castells, R. et al. The hypoxia-controlled FBXL14 ubiquitin ligase targets SNAIL1 for proteasome degradation. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 3794–3805 (2010).
Zhou, B. P. et al. Dual regulation of Snail by GSK-3beta-mediated phosphorylation in control of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Nat. Cell Biol. 6, 931–940 (2004).
Finn, R. S. et al. PD 0332991, a selective cyclin D kinase 4/6 inhibitor, preferentially inhibits proliferation of luminal estrogen receptor-positive human breast cancer cell lines in vitro. Breast Cancer Res. 11, R77 (2009).
Rivadeneira, D. B. et al. Proliferative suppression by CDK4/6 inhibition: complex function of the retinoblastoma pathway in liver tissue and hepatoma cells. Gastroenterology 138, 1920–1930 (2010).
Dickson, M. A. et al. Phase II trial of the CDK4 inhibitor PD0332991 in patients with advanced CDK4-amplified well-differentiated or dedifferentiated liposarcoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 31, 2024–2028 (2013).
Beaver, J. A. et al. FDA approval: palbociclib for the treatment of postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 21, 4760–4766 (2015).
Finn, R. S. et al. The cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib in combination with letrozole versus letrozole alone as first-line treatment of oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer (PALOMA-1/TRIO-18): a randomised phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 16, 25–35 (2015).
Sun, M. et al. Activation of the ATM-Snail pathway promotes breast cancer metastasis. J. Mol. Cell Biol. 4, 304–315 (2012).
MacPherson, M. R. et al. Phosphorylation of serine 11 and serine 92 as new positive regulators of human Snail1 function: potential involvement of casein kinase-2 and the cAMP-activated kinase protein kinase A. Mol. Biol. Cell 21, 244–253 (2010).
Wu, Y. et al. Stabilization of snail by NF-kappaB is required for inflammation-induced cell migration and invasion. Cancer Cell 15, 416–428 (2009).
Zhang, K. et al. The collagen receptor discoidin domain receptor 2 stabilizes SNAIL1 to facilitate breast cancer metastasis. Nat. Cell Biol. 15, 677–687 (2013).
Vernon, A. E. & LaBonne, C. Tumor metastasis: a new twist on epithelial-mesenchymal transitions. Curr. Biol. 14, R719–R721 (2004).
Tse, J. C. & Kalluri, R. Mechanisms of metastasis: epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and contribution of tumor microenvironment. J. Cell Biochem. 101, 816–829 (2007).
Guarino, M., Rubino, B. & Ballabio, G. The role of epithelial-mesenchymal transition in cancer pathology. Pathology 39, 305–318 (2007).
Ye, X. & Weinberg, R. A. Epithelial-mesenchymal plasticity: a central regulator of cancer progression. Trends Cell Biol. 25, 675–686 (2015).
Tam, W. L. & Weinberg, R. A. The epigenetics of epithelial-mesenchymal plasticity in cancer. Nat. Med. 19, 1438–1449 (2013).
Delgado-Diaz, M. R., Martin, Y., Berg, A., Freire, R. & Smits, V. A. Dub3 controls DNA damage signalling by direct deubiquitination of H2AX. Mol. Oncol. 8, 884–893 (2014).
Pereg, Y. et al. Ubiquitin hydrolase Dub3 promotes oncogenic transformation by stabilizing Cdc25A. Nat. Cell Biol. 12, 400–406 (2010).
van der Laan, S., Tsanov, N., Crozet, C. & Maiorano, D. High Dub3 expression in mouse ESCs couples the G1/S checkpoint to pluripotency. Mol. Cell 52, 366–379 (2013).
Baek, K. H. Cytokine-regulated protein degradation by the ubiquitination system. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 7, 171–177 (2006).
Burrows, J. F., McGrattan, M. J. & Johnston, J. A. The DUB/USP17 deubiquitinating enzymes, a multigene family within a tandemly repeated sequence. Genomics 85, 524–529 (2005).
Rokavec, M. et al. IL-6R/STAT3/miR-34a feedback loop promotes EMT-mediated colorectal cancer invasion and metastasis. J. Clin. Invest. 124, 1853–1867 (2014).
Sullivan, N. J. et al. Interleukin-6 induces an epithelial-mesenchymal transition phenotype in human breast cancer cells. Oncogene 28, 2940–2947 (2009).
Huang, O. W. et al. Phosphorylation-dependent activity of the deubiquitinase DUBA. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 19, 171–175 (2012).
Lopez-Otin, C. & Hunter, T. The regulatory crosstalk between kinases and proteases in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 10, 278–292 (2010).
Sherr, C. J., Beach, D. & Shapiro, G. I. Targeting CDK4 and CDK6: from discovery to therapy. Cancer Discov. 6, 353–367 (2015).
Asghar, U., Witkiewicz, A. K., Turner, N. C. & Knudsen, E. S. The history and future of targeting cyclin-dependent kinases in cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 14, 130–146 (2015).
This work was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program, grant no. 2013CB530700), National Natural Science Foundation of China (31270806, 81322031, 81572770 and 31371367), Mayo Clinic Breast Cancer SPORE (P50CA116201) and National Institutes of Health grants (CA203971, CA130996, CA189666 and CA203561). Breast Cancer Genome-Guided Therapy study (BEAUTY) was supported by Center for Individualized Medicine of Mayo Clinic.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, T., Yu, J., Deng, M. et al. CDK4/6-dependent activation of DUB3 regulates cancer metastasis through SNAIL1. Nat Commun 8, 13923 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13923
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment (2021)
Science China Materials (2021)
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research (2020)
Targeting deubiquitinating enzyme USP26 by microRNA-203 regulates Snail1’s pro-metastatic functions in esophageal cancer
Cancer Cell International (2020)
USP29 enhances chemotherapy-induced stemness in non-small cell lung cancer via stabilizing Snail1 in response to oxidative stress
Cell Death & Disease (2020)