Article | Open | Published:

Evidence for spin-to-charge conversion by Rashba coupling in metallic states at the Fe/Ge(111) interface

Nature Communications volume 7, Article number: 13857 (2016) | Download Citation


The spin–orbit coupling relating the electron spin and momentum allows for spin generation, detection and manipulation. It thus fulfils the three basic functions of the spin field-effect transistor. However, the spin Hall effect in bulk germanium is too weak to produce spin currents, whereas large Rashba effect at Ge(111) surfaces covered with heavy metals could generate spin-polarized currents. The Rashba spin splitting can actually be as large as hundreds of meV. Here we show a giant spin-to-charge conversion in metallic states at the Fe/Ge(111) interface due to the Rashba coupling. We generate very large charge currents by direct spin pumping into the interface states from 20 K to room temperature. The presence of these metallic states at the Fe/Ge(111) interface is demonstrated by first-principles electronic structure calculations. By this, we demonstrate how to take advantage of the spin–orbit coupling for the development of the spin field-effect transistor.


Nowadays the field of spintronics mainly relies on the exchange coupling in ferromagnetic (FM) materials to generate and detect spin-polarized currents1. However, the spin–orbit coupling (SOC) appears now as a very efficient way to complete both operations2. Indeed, it has been shown that spin-polarized currents can be generated and detected by the spin Hall effect (SHE) in bulk materials3 and the Rashba effect at interfaces4,5. Although both effects have been first observed in semiconductors6,7,8,9, they are intensively studied into pure heavy metals10, alloys11 or at metallic interfaces12. Meanwhile the field of semiconductor spintronics is evolving fast to develop the spin field-effect transistor13 that would represent a real technological breakthrough in microelectronics. Its development in silicon (Si) or germanium (Ge) requires the spin injection, detection and manipulation at room temperature. Although the SHE is very weak in bulk germanium14, it can be greatly enhanced at the interface between Ge(111) with heavy metals due to the Rashba effect15. In ref. 15, a single layer of Pb deposited on Ge(111) leads to a giant spin splitting of 200 meV along the MΓM direction. Moreover, this type of spin-split surface states are believed to be ubiquitous in any kind of interfaces between Ge(111) and other metals16. Hence, beyond providing a way to manipulate the electron spin state, these Rashba states could also be used to generate and detect spin currents in germanium at room temperature, which represents a very new paradigm in the field of semiconductor spintronics.

In this study, we demonstrate a giant spin-to-charge conversion at the Fe/Ge(111) interface due to the Rashba effect into spin-split metallic states, despite the relative lightness of Fe and Ge atoms. Spin accumulation is dynamically generated by direct spin pumping into interface states and converted into a two-dimensional (2D) charge current as a result of the Rashba SOC. Ab initio calculations allow us to demonstrate the presence of Rashba states at the Fe/Ge(111) interface and explain, by simple arguments, the large spin-to-charge conversion.



In open-circuit conditions and for a 200 mW radio frequency (RF) excitation, the generated voltage normalized to the RF power (that is, to in G2 where hrf is the radio frequency magnetic field) is 25 μV G−2 at 20 K when the Ge(111) substrate is insulating, highlighting the interfacial character of the conversion. It reaches 50 μV G−2 at room temperature. This voltage is proportional to the generated charge current and to the resistance of the sample in between the two electrical contacts. For a 2.4 × 0.4 mm2 sample, we find a generated charge current of 1 μA G−2 constant with temperature. As a comparison, for the same sample dimensions, Rojas-Sánchez et al.5 found 0.5 μA G−2 in NiFe(15 nm)/Ag(10 nm)/Bi(8 nm) by the inverse Edelstein effect (IEE) at the Ag/Bi interface and 0.5 μA G−2 in Co(15 nm)/Pt(20 nm) by the inverse SHE in platinum at room temperature17. It shows that the spin-to-charge conversion is highly efficient at the Fe/Ge(111) interface. First-principles electronic band structure calculations based on the density functional theory confirm the existence of pd hybridized metallic states at the Fe/Ge(111) interface. Those states exhibit a Rashba spin splitting up to 50 meV along the ΓK direction of the surface Brillouin zone. Moreover, owing to their hybridization with localized Fe d states, spin-up and spin-down subbands are energy split due to an exchange coupling of the order of 180 meV. In this case, the effect of the Rashba SOC together with the exchange coupling leads to an electronic structure with a lack of mirror symmetry with respect to the plane normal to the surface and containing the in-plane Fe magnetization. Considering this particular symmetry breaking of the Fermi surface (FS), we present simple arguments to explain the large charge current generation by spin pumping into Fe/Ge(111) interface states.

Sample growth

For the purpose of this study, we have grown several samples by molecular beam epitaxy (see Methods for details) as follows: Fe/Ge(111), Fe/MgO(5 nm)/Ge(111), Fe/MgO(20 nm)/Ge(111) and Fe/Ge(100), as well as two reference samples Fe/MgO(001) and Fe/SiO2/Si. In Fe/MgO(5 nm)/Ge(111), we reduce the exchange coupling between Ge p states and Fe d states by inserting a 5 nm-thick MgO layer, whereas for a 20 nm-thick MgO spacer, we completely suppress the signal18. In Fe/Ge(100), we reduce the spin-to-charge conversion efficiency due to the weak SOC at the Ge(100) surface19. The small mismatch (≈1.3%) between the lattice constant of Ge and twice the unit cell constant of bcc Fe makes possible the growth of single crystalline Fe films on Ge(100) and Ge(111) surfaces. As shown in Fig. 1a–c, bcc Fe grows epitaxially on Ge(111) with the (111) texture and a 60° lattice rotation with respect to the Ge diamond lattice. The epitaxial relationship is thus Fe(111)[11] || Ge(111)[2]. The high-resolution scanning transmission electron microscopy image in Fig. 1d confirms the epitaxial growth of Fe on Ge(111) and the very sharp interface. Similarly, bcc Fe grows epitaxially on Ge(100) and X-ray diffraction data give the epitaxial relationship Fe(001)[100] || Ge(001)[100] (see Methods). In both Ge(100) and Ge(111) samples, the Fe lattice parameter deduced from X-ray diffraction data is in agreement with the value for bulk Fe: aFe=2.86(1) Å. Based on these results and on ab initio calculations, we propose an ideally sharp Fe/Ge(111) interface in Fig. 1e that minimizes the interface energy. This same atomic configuration is used to perform the first-principles electronic band structure calculations.

Figure 1: Atomic structure of the Fe/Ge(111) interface.
Figure 1

(a) X-ray diffraction data for the Fe/Ge(111) sample: (211) pole figure for 2θ=99.8° with a 3° detector angular acceptance. Φ and Ψ are the azimuth and declination angles, respectively. (b,c) ω/2θ scan of the Fe (112) and Ge (224) X-ray diffraction lines, respectively. (d) High-resolution scanning transmission electron microscopy image of the Fe/Ge(111) interface in cross-section along the [01] Ge cristallographic axis. Scale bar, 2 nm. Inset: large-scale image of the Fe/Ge(111) interface along the same cristallographic axis. Scale bar, 20 nm. (e) Atomic model for the Fe/Ge(111) interface. Light green Fe atoms substitute the dark magenta Ge atoms. (f) Sketch of the experimental geometry for spin pumping-transverse voltage measurements. The top Fe layer is contacted using Ti/Au electrodes and the sample is inserted into an X-band cavity working at f=9.7 GHz. The static magnetic field (HDC) is applied in the film plane along y and the radiofrequency magnetic field (hrf) along x.

Spin-to-charge conversion

Spin pumping-voltage measurements are carried out using the experimental configuration shown in Fig. 1f. The results are shown in Fig. 2. At 293 K, we find a large electrical signal of the order of 50 μV G−2 for Fe/Ge(111), whereas it drops by a factor 2.5 for Fe/MgO(5 nm)/Ge(111) and almost disappears for Fe/MgO(20 nm)/Ge(111) and Fe/Ge(100). It clearly demonstrates that the Fe/Ge(111) interface plays a crucial role in obtaining huge spin-to-charge conversion: the signal decreases when separating the Fe(111) and Ge(111) surfaces with a thin MgO barrier and even disappears when increasing the MgO thickness or changing the surface symmetry. The MgO layers grown on Ge(111) are polycrystalline as shown by in-situ electron diffraction and contain a high concentration of oxygen vacancies, which favours inelastic tunnelling as emphasized by Fukuma et al.20. For transparent tunnel barriers, a non-zero exchange coupling sets in between the ferromagnet (Fe) and the semiconductor interface states (MgO/Ge), which can produce a spin-to-charge conversion. This exchange coupling, even small, may be mediated by direct tunnelling through evanescent waves within the MgO barrier or via localized defects, for example, oxygen vacancies. Such physical process has already been addressed to explain the efficient spin injection in Si or Ge by spin pumping through a tunnel barrier21,22,23 and is also at the origin of the voltage signal detected through the 5 nm-thick MgO barrier. On the other hand, for a 20 nm-thick MgO barrier, we do not observe any voltage signal at the FM resonance (FMR) due to the vanishing tunnelling exchange coupling. Moreover, the measurements on the reference samples presented in the Methods allow us to rule out any electrical signal originating from the Fe electrode itself by the inverse SHE24,25, the IEE at the Fe/MgO interface, anisotropic magnetoresistance (AMR) effects26 or magnonic charge pumping27. Electrical measurements on the Fe/Ge(111) sample are shown in Fig. 3a–c. Using the two-probe resistance in Fig. 3a, we can then convert the measured voltage into an electrical current as shown in Fig. 3d. We find a generated current of the order of 1 μA G−2 and constant with temperature. Owing to this large current amplitude, one can merely disregard the inverse SHE in bulk Ge to be the cause of the spin-to-charge conversion because of the relatively small spin Hall angle measured in n-type Ge of the order of ≤0.1%8,9,14. Moreover, the electrical signal is constant with temperature, whereas both the Ge(111) substrate and the Fe/Ge(111) Schottky interface become insulating when decreasing the temperature (Fig. 3b,c). This is another strong indication that the conversion mechanism is of pure interface type. The Ge substrate only influences the shape of the electrical signal. As shown in Fig. 3b,c, the Ge substrate becomes conducting and the Fe/Ge(111) Schottky contact more transparent above 200 K. This can be seen in Fig. 3a, where the two-probe resistance starts to drop above 200 K due to the short into the substrate. As a consequence, the generated electrical current is partly shorted into the substrate above 200 K, which gives an additional asymmetric contribution to the signal as shown in Fig. 3f. At 20 K, the signal is completely symmetric with respect to the resonance magnetic field. Moreover, it changes its sign when the static field is reversed and the signal scales linearly with the RF power (see Fig. 3g).

Figure 2: FMR and transverse voltage measurements.
Figure 2

The FMR spectrum and transverse voltage are recorded simultaneously for Fe/Ge(111), Fe/MgO/Ge(111) and Fe/Ge(100) at 293 K in a,b and 20 K in c,d, respectively. Fe/MgO(5 nm)/Ge(111) corresponds to the dark green curve and Fe/MgO(20 nm)/Ge(111) to the light green curve. Fe/MgO(20 nm)/Ge(111) was only measured at room temperature.

Figure 3: Electrical properties of Fe/Ge(111).
Figure 3

(a) Two-probe resistance of the Fe/Ge(111) sample as a function of temperature. (b,c) Temperature dependence of the Ge(111) substrate resistance and Fe/Ge(111) Schottky contact resistance, respectively. (d) Generated charge current as a function of temperature. The current is defined as: I=V/(R × ) where V is the measured transverse voltage at the resonance field, R is the two-probe resistance shown in a and hrf=0.535 G is the radiofrequency field corresponding to a 50 mW RF power. The static magnetic field HDC is applied along y. (e) Low temperature dependence of the generated current for the applied field HDC along y (blue, parallel configuration) and along −y (red, antiparallel configuration). (f) Shape evolution of the electrical signal as a function of temperature. A clear asymmetric component appears above 200 K. (g) Electrical signal recorded at 20 K as a function of the RF power and the static field direction.

Ab initio calculations

Our first-principles calculations confirm the existence of metallic exchange and spin–orbit split Fe/Ge(111) interface states. Figure 4a,b display the calculated 2D-FS at the Fe/Ge(111) interface within the first Brillouin zone (see Methods for details). The calculations demonstrate the existence of a large density of metallic states in which spin-to-charge conversion might occur. These states exhibit both p and d characters originating from hybridized Ge and Fe states, respectively. In Fig. 4a, without SOC, the FS is sixfold degenerate. The inner blue part shows a snowflake-like structure such as the pristine Ge(111) surface (not shown here) and thus corresponds mostly to Ge p states with a majority spin character due to the exchange coupling with Fe d states. The loops close to the K points, as the one highlighted in green (for minority spins) and black (for majority spins) along the ΓK1 direction, have a dominant d character from Fe states. By including the SOC in Fig. 4b, minority and majority states are no more pure spin states and two main features become visible in the FS. First, the snowflake-like structure at low k values remains but exhibits a strong left–right asymmetry giving rise to a lack of mirror symmetry with respect to the (yz) plane containing the Fe magnetization. Then, the SOC modifies the loops close to the K points by introducing a strong spin mixing between majority and minority spin subbands, as well as the same left–right asymmetry. Figure 4c,d display the calculated band structures at the interface along the ΓK1 and ΓM directions, respectively. Only one-third of the first Brillouin zone corresponding to the snowflake-like structure is represented. At the Γ point, the exchange splitting is of the order of 180 meV. The Rashba coupling varies from ≈10 to ≈50 meV, from the Γ to the K1 point.

Figure 4: Results of ab initio calculations.
Figure 4

Two-dimensional Fermi surfaces (2D-FS) in the hexagonal Brillouin zone (a) without and (b) with SOC for spin-polarized (SP) calculations. The blue dotted line gives the Fe magnetization direction along y. In a, the blue and red curves correspond to four majority and one minority bands, respectively, crossing the Fermi level. In b, the same bands are represented irrespective of the electron spin state. The colour scale relates to the distance of the energy band E(k) from the Fermi level EF at given k value as Log(1/|E(k)−EF|). Hence, max. means a band crossing the Fermi level. Without SOC, the Fermi contours are sixfold degenerate. For convenience, the six equivalent K points are labelled as K1 to K6. Along the ΓK direction, majority and minority states are degenerate at the crossing points with zero exchange splitting, which, however, becomes finite due to the SOC and the sixfold degeneracy is broken. This splitting is dominantly contributed by the SOC at the Fe/Ge(111) interface. (c,d) Calculated band structures of the Fe/Ge(111) interface states along the ΓK1 and ΓM directions, respectively. The bands experience a k-shift under the action of SOC, in directions indicated by blue arrows, which are opposite for minority and majority bands. Majority and minority states are indicated in black and red dots, respectively. With SOC, majority and minority states lose their meaning and the bands are indicated in light blue.


The first mechanism to consider for spin-to-charge conversion at interfaces is the IEE recently demonstrated experimentally in other systems involving Rashba interactions5,12,28. The charge current is produced by the spin accumulation generated at the interface between the FM and the non-magnetic 2D material and diffusing out of the FM source. The out-of-equilibrium spin accumulation transforms at the spin–orbit split FS of the non-magnetic 2D material into a charge current, owing to the different electron diffusion coefficients at the majority and minority spin Fermi contours29. This can be viewed as an extrinsic contribution. The IEE is well described by a characteristic length, λIEE=jC/jS, where jC is the lateral 2D charge current density (in A m−1) and jS is the pumped spin current density (in A m−2). This constant reflects the spin-to-charge conversion efficiency and can be written λIEE= for a 2D electron gas with Rashba interaction. λSO is the spin–orbit strength (in eV nm) and is the momentum relaxation time also scaling with the spin-flip time in the limit of large spin–orbit interaction. As detailed in the Methods, we estimate λIEE=jC/jS≈0.13 nm at room temperature in Fe/Ge(111), which is comparable to the value obtained for Ag/Bi (0.3 nm)5. However, ab initio calculations show the presence of a substantial exchange interaction within Fe/Ge(111) interface states. It makes possible alternate mechanisms such as direct spin pumping and spin-to-charge conversion into the exchange split interface electron gas. This intrinsic scenario has already been suggested to explain the generation of lateral charge currents by spin pumping at the MgO/Ge interface21 and at the FM/Topological insulator interface30,31. It differs from the IEE by the localization of exchange coupling in the 2D electron gas itself. Moreover, the occurence of a large signal in the Fe/MgO/Ge(111) sample rules out the IEE picture due to the negligible tunnelling transmission through MgO, whereas a small reminiscent exchange coupling is sufficient for the intrinsic scenario. At the FMR of the Fe electrode, the electron spins at the Fe/Ge(111) interface precess following the Fe magnetization under the action of an effective exchange field, which comes from the hybridization of Ge p states with Fe d states. This spin precession creates a steady state out-of-equilibrium spin component along y, leading to a chemical potential splitting between majority and minority spins. A net charge current then sets in along the x direction due to the lack of mirror symmetry of the electronic density of states with respect to the (yz) plane as shown in Fig. 4b. The generated charge current corresponds to the one we detect experimentally. However, an exact estimation of this charge current would require the knowledge of spin accumulation and Rashba coupling in the k-space, as well as the electron scattering mechanisms at interfaces, which requires more experimental and theoretical works. It is worth noting that, if we rotate the Fe magnetization by 90° along x (or equivalently, along the ΓM direction of the surface Brillouin zone), the generated charge current will be along y with a different intensity due to the anisotropy of the 2D electronic band structure of the Fe/Ge(111) interface states. Finally, as shown in Fig. 3e, we observe a sign change of the generated transverse charge current below T≈14 K. Although the physical origin of this sign change is not yet elucidated, it suggests that this interconversion could be modulated by a gate voltage.

In summary, we have experimentally and theoretically shown giant spin-to-charge conversion at the interface between two light atoms, one of them being germanium, which is compatible with silicon-based technology. This work suggests that spin currents can be generated from charge currents at the single-crystalline Fe/Ge(111) interface. We thus believe that it will motivate future works on spin transport at model interfaces between metal and semiconductor light atoms. Moreover, spin-to-charge conversion at the Fe/Ge(111) interface gives an experimental demonstration in spintronics of spectroscopic predictions. Finally, it shows that SOC in silicon and germanium could be used to generate and detect spin currents, which are the basic operations of the spin field-effect transistor but also to develop interfacial spin-orbit torques for the manipulation of magnetization.


Sample growth and characterization

Before the sample growth, Ge(111) substrates are degreased 5 min in ultrasonic baths using aceton and isopropyl alcohol, and transferred in deionized water to the growth chamber. Ge surfaces are then annealed up to 850° under ultra-high vacuum conditions, to thermally remove the oxide layer and smooth the surface. The resulting Ge(111) surfaces are atomically flat and not reconstructed as shown by the streaky reflection high-energy electron diffraction (RHEED) patterns in Fig. 5a,b. All the 20 nm-thick Fe layers are grown under ultra-high vacuum conditions with a base pressure <5 × 10−10 mbar on low-doped n-type (111) and (100) Ge substrates with n≈1016 cm−3. The growths are performed at low rates and at room temperature, in order to limit atomic interdiffusion at the Fe/Ge interface32,33. As-grown Fe films are single crystalline but their surface is rough as shown by the spotty RHEED patterns in Fig. 5c,d. This surface roughness is a consequence of the low growth temperature. The X-ray diffraction data for the Fe/Ge(100) sample are shown in Fig. 6. They confirm the epitaxial relationship Fe(001)[100] || Ge(001)[100]. Moreover, using the Scherrer equation, the width of the Fe(200) diffraction line yields an iron thickness of 20 nm as expected. The 5 and 20 nm-thick MgO spacer layers are grown on Ge(111) at 300 °C and a low growth rate of 0.025 Å s−1. The Ge substrate resistivity is of the order of 1 Ω cm at room temperature. The Fe films are finally protected against oxidation by a 8 nm-thick aluminum capping layer. For the Fe/MgO(001) reference sample, a 20 nm-thick Fe layer is epitaxially grown on MgO(001) at room temperature and a growth rate of 0.5 Å s−1. The film is then annealed at 630 °C during 20 min to reach a very high crystalline quality as shown by the streaky RHEED pattern. For the Fe/SiO2/Si reference sample, a 20 nm-thick Fe film is grown at room temperature and a growth rate of 0.5 Å s−1. Owing to the amorphous character of the SiO2 substrate, the Fe layer is polycrystalline as shown by the presence of rings in the RHEED pattern.

Figure 5: RHEED patterns of Ge(111) and Fe(111) surfaces.
Figure 5

The RHEED patterns are shown along two different azimuths of the Ge(111) surface in a,b and Fe(111) surface in c,d, respectively.

Figure 6: X-ray diffraction data for the Fe/Ge(100) sample.
Figure 6

(a) Reciprocal space map of the Fe(211) and Ge(422) reflections. The perpendicular and parallel components of the corresponding momentum transfers Qperp and Qpar are along [100] and [011], respectively. (b) θ/2θ Scans for the Fe/Ge(100) sample and Ge(100) substrate showing the Fe(200) and Ge(400) diffraction lines.

X-ray measurements are performed with a Panalytical Empyrean diffractometer equipped with a Cobalt anode beam tube (λ=1.789 Å), a Göbel Mirror and a 2D PIXcel detector used in both zero-dimensional and one-dimensional modes. The cross-sectional electron microscopy specimen was prepared by a focused ion beam. Scanning transmission electron microscopy operation was carried out under a 300 keV acceleration energy using a probe aberration-corrected microscope (Titan Themis FEI).

Spin pumping and transverse voltage measurements

After the epitaxial growth, samples are cut into small rectangular pieces of 2.4 mm length and 0.4 mm width. Electrical connections are achieved using aluminum wire bonding. The samples are finally glued on a sample holder made of printed circuits and placed in the centre of a cylindrical X-band resonator cavity (f≈9.7 GHz, TE011 mode). The spin pumping and transverse voltage measurements are obtained on two different samples with similar results. In some other samples, we observe a strong symmetric voltage at the resonance field with the same sign for HDC applied along y and −y. We attribute this signal to the Seebeck effect in germanium. When the radiofrequency power is not equally distributed over the length of the sample, a temperature gradient appears between both ends of the sample, which gives rise to a large Seebeck voltage. It can be almost removed by precisely positioning the sample inside the cavity to put the maximum radiofrequency power in the middle of the sample.

The FMR spectra and voltage measurements on the reference samples Fe/MgO(001) and Fe/SiO2/Si are shown in Fig. 7 and in Fig. 8, respectively. In both samples, we could not detect any voltage signal at room temperature.

Figure 7: FMR spectra of the reference samples.
Figure 7

The spectra are recorded at room temperature under 200 mW for the following: Fe(20 nm)/MgO(20 nm)/Ge(111) substrate; Fe(20 nm)/MgO(001) substrate; and Fe(20 nm)/SiO2/Si. Owing to the single crystalline character of Fe(20 nm)/MgO(001), the magneto-crystalline anisotropy shifts the resonance field to higher values.

Figure 8: Transverse voltage measurements on reference samples.
Figure 8

Room-temperature transverse voltage (normalized to the RF power) generated by spin-to-charge conversion at the FMR of the Fe electrode at two different RF powers 50 and 200 mW in the following: Fe(20 nm)/Ge(111); Fe(20 nm)/MgO(20 nm)/Ge(111) substrate; Fe(20 nm)/MgO(001) substrate; and Fe(20 nm)/SiO2/Si.

To estimate the characteristic IEE length λIEE, we consider the Fe/Ge(111) system as a simple bilayer system where the spin accumulation level is maintained constant in Fe by the spin pumping mechanism and spin flips occur into the Fe/Ge(111) interface states. The Fe/Ge(111) metallic interface states are not an ideal spin sink but their spin absorption efficiency nonetheless scales with the change of the FMR spectra linewidth, whereby the effect of the spin backflow process34 is involved in the change of the Fe damping parameter α. To take this spin backflow process into account, we define an effective spin mixing conductance35: . Meff is the effective saturation magnetization defined as: . MS is the saturation magnetization of the Fe electrode and Hu corresponds to the perpendicular uniaxial anisotropy field. tF=20 nm is the thickness of the Fe electrode, geff is the Landé factor and μB the Bohr magneton. α (resp. αFe bulk) is the damping factor of Fe/Ge(111) (resp. bulk Fe). The Landé factor geff, the effective saturation magnetization of Fe Meff and the Gilbert damping factor α are deduced from broadband FMR measurements at room temperature. The measurements are summarized in Fig. 9. The frequency dependence of the resonance field is fitted using the following equation:

Figure 9: Broadband FMR measurements at room temperature
Figure 9

The static magnetic field is applied in the film plane. (a) FMR lines recorded at different excitation frequencies from 4 GHz (left) to 24 GHz (right). Black dots are experimental data and solid lines are fits using a Lorentzian shape for the absorption line. The resonance fields and peak-to-peak linewidths are extracted from the fits. (b) Resonance field μ0Hres as a function of the excitation frequency. Black dots are experimental data and solid lines are fits using equation (1). (c) Peak-to-peak linewidth ΔHpp as a function of the excitation frequency. Black dots are experimental data and the solid line is a fit using equation (2).

where ω=2πf and γ=geffμB/ħ is the electron gyromagnetic ratio. In the same way, the frequency dependence of the peak-to-peak linewidth is given by:

where the ΔH0 term accounts for the frequency-independent contributions due to inhomogeneities in the FM layer. From the fits, we find the following: μ0Meff≈1.83 T, geff=2.1 and α=0.0032. Using αFe bulk=0.0018 (ref. 36), we obtain ≈2.6 × 1019 m−2. The vertical spin current density transferred from the Fe layer to the Fe/Ge(111) interface states is then given by37:

Using f=9.7 GHz, ω=2πf and hrf=0.535 G, we find jS≈1.73 × 107 A m−2. The spin-to-charge conversion only occurs into the Fe/Ge(111) interface states, as no signal could be detected in the reference samples Fe/MgO(001) and Fe/SiO2/Si. The generated charge current density jC writes: jC=V/(Rw) where V≈46 μV is the measured voltage at room temperature, R≈51 Ω is the sample resistance between the two voltage probes and w=0.4 mm is the sample width. We find the generated charge current: jC=2.257 × 10−3 A m−1 and derive λIEE=jC/jS≈0.13 nm.

Ab initio calculations

The electronic structure calculations were performed employing the full-potential linearized augmented plane wave method38,39 as implemented in the FLEUR code ( A mixed functional was used for the exchange-correlation potential based on the approximation by Perdew40 where all the gradient terms were set to zero within the Ge muffin-tin spheres. In this way, both Fe and Ge were treated with optimal functionals: the Fe atoms were better described within the generalized gradient approximation while the lattice constant of Ge was well reproduced in the local-density approximation (LDA). Generalized gradient approximation overestimates the lattice constant of Ge by 2.5%, whereas in LDA it is only 0.6% smaller compared with the experimental lattice constant 5.657 Å. However, it is well known that LDA produces a metallic ground state for Ge. To model a semiconducting ground state, we follow the suggestion in ref. 41 using an LDA+U scheme that optimizes the band-gap energy at experimental lattice constant. The on-site Coulomb parameters Udd=6 eV applied on the 3d electrons and Upp=−3 eV on the 4p electrons were used to optimize the position of d-like and p-like states, respectively. Now, instead of a metallic ground state, this approach opens up indirect and direct band gap energies of 0.4 and 0.5 eV at the Γ and L points in the Brillouin zone (BZ), respectively, in close vicinity to the experimental values, although the energies are slightly underestimated in comparison with the experimental values, for example, 0.66 eV at the L point. Our asymmetric film consist of 10 layers of Fe in fcc stacking on 23 layers of the Ge(111) substrate terminated with hydrogen atoms, to simulate the semi-infinite substrate. The total energy of different Fe-Ge stackings were calculated. The stacking of Fe-Ge with lowest energy is consistent with the experimental results and the surface unit cell comprises one atom per layer. The distances between the different layers were relaxed until the forces on the atoms comprising the top three Fe layers, as well as the Fe/Ge interface and sub-interface layers were smaller than 1 mRyd per a.u. For the structurally optimized system we have calculated the electronic structure and the FS properties with and without SOC. For the convergence of self-consistently determined quantities, the plane wave cutoff energy and the k-points in the 2D BZ were checked carefully. The calculations were totally converged with and without SOC using k||=256 in the full 2D BZ with a charge-density cutoff parameter of 15.0 per a.u. and a plane-wave cutoff parameter of 3.8 per a.u. to expand the linearized augmented plane wave basis functions. The 2D-FS was calculated for k||=2,304 in the full BZ using converged charge density and a linear interpolation scheme was used to calculate the k|| points close to the Fermi level by a threshold value of 1 meV.

Data availability

The experimental data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request. The results of ab initio calculations are also available from AKN upon reasonable request.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Oyarzún, S. et al. Evidence for spin-to-charge conversion by Rashba coupling in metallic states at the Fe/Ge(111) interface. Nat. Commun. 7, 13857 doi: 10.1038/ncomms13857 (2016).

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1.

    Maekawa S. (ed.) Concepts in Spin Electronics Oxford UnivPress (2006).

  2. 2.

    & Current-induced spin orientation of electrons in semiconductors. Phys. Lett. A 35, 459–460 (1971).

  3. 3.

    & Direct electronic measurements of the spin Hall effect. Nature 442, 176–179 (2006).

  4. 4.

    et al. Spin polarization of conduction electrons induced by electric current in two-dimensional asymmetric electron systems. Solid State Commun. 73, 233–235 (1990).

  5. 5.

    et al. Spin-to-charge conversion using Rashba coupling at the interface between non-magnetic materials. Nat. Commun. 4, 2944 (2013).

  6. 6.

    , , & Observation of the spin Hall effect in semiconductors. Science 306, 19101913 (2004).

  7. 7.

    et al. Energy structure and quantized Hall effect of two-dimensional holes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 126–129 (1983).

  8. 8.

    & Experimental evidence of the anomalous hall effect in a nonmagnetic semiconductor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 29, 1676–1679 (1972).

  9. 9.

    Spin-dependent Hall effect in semiconductors. Phys. Rev. B 11, 3918–3934 (1975).

  10. 10.

    et al. Room-temperature reversible spin Hall effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 156601–156604 (2007).

  11. 11.

    et al. Experimental evidences of a large extrinsic spin Hall effect in AuW alloy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 142403–142405 (2014).

  12. 12.

    , , , & Spin pumping and inverse Rashba-Edelstein effect in NiFe/Ag/Bi and NiFe/Ag/Sb. J. Appl. Phys. 117, 17C727 (2015).

  13. 13.

    & Electronic analog of the electrooptic modulator. Appl. Phys. Lett. 56, 665–667 (1990).

  14. 14.

    et al. Crossover from spin accumulation into interface states to spin injection in the germanium conduction band. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 106603–106607 (2012).

  15. 15.

    et al. Large Rashba spin splitting of a metallic surface-state band on a semiconductor surface. Nat. Commun. 1, 17 (2010).

  16. 16.

    et al. Different types of Rashba spin-split surface states on Ge(111). J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 201, 74–80 (2015).

  17. 17.

    et al. Spin pumping and inverse spin Hall effect in platinum: the essential role of spin-memory loss at metallic interfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 106602–106606 (2014).

  18. 18.

    , , , & Suppression of spin-pumping by a MgO tunnel-barrier. Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 022502 (2010).

  19. 19.

    , , , & Electronic states of the clean Ge(001) surface near Fermi energy. Phys. Rev. B 72, 241308R–241311R (2005).

  20. 20.

    et al. Giant enhancement of spin accumulation and long-distance spin precession in metallic lateral spin valves. Nat. Mater. 10, 527–531 (2011).

  21. 21.

    et al. Spin pumping and inverse spin Hall effect in germanium. Phys. Rev. B 88, 064403–064417 (2013).

  22. 22.

    et al. Ferromagnetic resonance spin pumping and electrical spin injection in silicon-based metal-oxide-semiconductor heterostructures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 246602 (2015).

  23. 23.

    et al. Spin transport in p-type germanium. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 28, 165801 (2016).

  24. 24.

    et al. Self-induced inverse spin Hall effect in permalloy at room temperature. Phys. Rev. B 89, 235317–235322 (2014).

  25. 25.

    , , & Detection of the DC inverse spin Hall effect due to spin pumping in a novel meander-stripline geometry. IEEE Magn. Lett. 5, 3700104 (2014).

  26. 26.

    , , , & Analysis of the line shape of electrically detected ferromagnetic resonance. Phys. Rev. B 84, 054423–054434 (2011).

  27. 27.

    et al. Electrical detection of ferromagnetic resonance in single layers of permalloy: evidence of magnonic charge pumping. Phys. Rev. B 92, 024402–024408 (2015).

  28. 28.

    et al. Control of the spin to charge conversion using the inverse Rashba-Edelstein effect. Appl. Phys. Lett. 106, 172403 (2015).

  29. 29.

    & Current-induced spin-orbit torques. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 369, 3175–3197 (2015).

  30. 30.

    et al. Spin-electricity conversion induced by spin injection into topological insulators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 196601–196605 (2014).

  31. 31.

    et al. Giant spin pumping and inverse spin Hall effect in the presence of surface and bulk spinorbit coupling of topological insulator Bi2Se3. Nano Lett. 15, 7126–7132 (2015).

  32. 32.

    & Crystalline quality of α-Fe films on Si(111) and Ge(111) substrates grown by direct ion beam deposition. Thin Solid Films 281–282, 46–51 (1996).

  33. 33.

    et al. Growth of Fe/Ge(100) heterostructures by molecular beam epitaxy: interface structure, electronic and magnetic properties. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 20, 1586–1590 (2002).

  34. 34.

    & Spin backflow and ac voltage generation by spin pumping and the inverse spin Hall effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 217602–217606 (2013).

  35. 35.

    , , & Nonlocal magnetization dynamics in ferromagnetic heterostructures. Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 1375–1421 (2005).

  36. 36.

    , , , & Low relaxation rate in epitaxial vanadium-doped ultrathin iron films. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 117601 (2015).

  37. 37.

    et al. Inverse spin-Hall effect induced by spin pumping in metallic system. J. Appl. Phys. 109, 103913 (2011).

  38. 38.

    , , & Full-potential self-consistent linearized-augmented-plane-wave method for calculating the electronic structure of molecules and surfaces: O2 molecule. Phys. Rev. B 24, 864–875 (1981).

  39. 39.

    , & Linearized augmented plane-wave method for the electronic band structure of thin films. Phys. Rev. B 19, 1706–1719 (1979).

  40. 40.

    in Electronic Structure of Solids 1991 (eds Ziesche, P. & Eschrig, H.) (Akademie Verlag, 1991).

  41. 41.

    & Improved electronic structure and optical properties of sp-hybridized semiconductors using LDA+USIC. Braz. J. Phys. 36, 286–290 (2006).

Download references


We acknowledge the financial support from the French National Research Agency through the ANR projects SiGeSPIN ANR-13-BS10-0002 and SOspin ANR-13-BS10-0005. They also acknowledge Nicolas Mollard for the preparation of electron microscopy specimens. Professor Aurélien Manchon and Dr Nicolas Reyren are also acknowledged for fruitful scientific discussions.

Author information


  1. Institut des Nanosciences et l'Energie Atomique et Cryogénie, INAC, Commissariat á aux Energies Alternatives-Univ. Grenoble Alpes, 17 rue des Martyrs, F-38000 Grenoble, France

    • S. Oyarzún
    • , F. Rortais
    • , M.-T. Dau
    • , P. Noël
    • , S. Pouget
    • , H. Okuno
    • , L. Vila
    • , C. Vergnaud
    • , C. Beigné
    • , A. Marty
    • , J.-P. Attané
    • , S. Gambarelli
    •  & M. Jamet
  2. CEA, INAC, F-38000 Grenoble, France

    • S. Oyarzún
    • , F. Rortais
    • , M.-T. Dau
    • , P. Noël
    • , S. Pouget
    • , H. Okuno
    • , L. Vila
    • , C. Vergnaud
    • , C. Beigné
    • , A. Marty
    • , J.-P. Attané
    • , S. Gambarelli
    •  & M. Jamet
  3. Departamento de Fisica, CEDENNA, Universidad de Santiago de Chile (USACH), 9170124 Santiago, Chile

    • S. Oyarzún
  4. Peter Grünberg Institute and Institute for Advanced Simulation, Forschungszentrum Jülich and JARA, 52425 Jülich, Germany

    • A. K. Nandy
    •  & S. Blügel
  5. Unité Mixte de Physique, CNRS, Thales, Univ. Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, 91767, Palaiseau, France

    • J.-C. Rojas-Sánchez
    • , P. Laczkowski
    • , J.-M. George
    •  & H. Jaffrès


  1. Search for S. Oyarzún in:

  2. Search for A. K. Nandy in:

  3. Search for F. Rortais in:

  4. Search for J.-C. Rojas-Sánchez in:

  5. Search for M.-T. Dau in:

  6. Search for P. Noël in:

  7. Search for P. Laczkowski in:

  8. Search for S. Pouget in:

  9. Search for H. Okuno in:

  10. Search for L. Vila in:

  11. Search for C. Vergnaud in:

  12. Search for C. Beigné in:

  13. Search for A. Marty in:

  14. Search for J.-P. Attané in:

  15. Search for S. Gambarelli in:

  16. Search for J.-M. George in:

  17. Search for H. Jaffrès in:

  18. Search for S. Blügel in:

  19. Search for M. Jamet in:


S.O. and M.J. supervised the project. M.J. proposed the study. S.O., J.-C.R.-S., M.-T.D. and P.N. performed the spin pumping measurements with the help of S.G., A.K.N. and S.B. performed and interpreted the ab initio calculations. S.O., F.R., C.V. and C.B. performed the electrical measurements on the Fe/Ge(111) sample. M.J. and A.M. performed the epitaxial growth of Fe/Ge samples. S.P. performed and analysed the X-ray diffraction data. H.O. made the transmission electron microscopy observations. H.J., S.B. and M.J. proposed the physical model for the spin-to-charge conversion. S.O., A.K.N. and M.J. wrote the paper with the comments of P.L., J.-M.G., J.-P.A. and L.V.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to S. Oyarzún or M. Jamet.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Peer Review File

About this article

Publication history






By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.