Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

PAXX promotes KU accumulation at DNA breaks and is essential for end-joining in XLF-deficient mice

Abstract

Non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) is the most prominent DNA double strand break (DSB) repair pathway in mammalian cells. PAXX is the newest NHEJ factor, which shares structural similarity with known NHEJ factors—XRCC4 and XLF. Here we report that PAXX is dispensable for physiological NHEJ in otherwise wild-type mice. Yet Paxx−/− mice require XLF and Xlf−/− mice require PAXX for end-ligation. As such, Xlf−/−Paxx−/− mice display severe genomic instability and neuronal apoptosis, which eventually lead to embryonic lethality. Despite their structural similarities, only Xlf−/− cells, but not Paxx−/− cells require ATM/DNA-PK kinase activity for end-ligation. Mechanistically, PAXX promotes the accumulation of KU at DSBs, while XLF enhances LIG4 recruitment without affecting KU dynamics at DNA breaks in vivo. Together these findings identify the molecular functions of PAXX in KU accumulation at DNA ends and reveal distinct, yet critically complementary functions of PAXX and XLF during NHEJ.

Introduction

DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) are the most severe form of DNA damages. In mammalian cells, most DSBs are repaired by the non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) pathway, which directly ligates two DNA ends together. NHEJ is not only critical for general DNA repair, but also exclusively required for lymphocyte development and the viability of post-mitotic neurons1. Accordingly, human patients and mouse models with defects in any of the seven well-characterized NHEJ factors develop severe primary immunodeficiency and variable degrees of microcephaly1,2. Among these factors, KU70 and KU80 (KU86 in human) form a heterodimer (referred to as KU) that binds and protects DNA ends from nucleases and recruits the DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNA-PKcs). DNA-PKcs in turn recruits and activates the Artemis endonuclease for end-processing (for example, hairpin opening). Finally, DNA Ligase 4 (Lig4), in complex with XRCC4 and XLF (also called Cernunnos or NHEJ1), ligates the ends together. The five ‘core’ NHEJ factors, KU70, KU80, XRCC4, Lig4 and XLF, are essential for end-ligation and conserved in all eukaryotes. In contrast, complete loss of DNA-PKcs or Artemis, both of which are only found in vertebrates, abolishes end-processing (that is, hairpin opening), but not end-ligation. We recently reported that expression of a kinase-dead DNA-PKcs protein blocks end-ligation, suggesting that DNA-PKcs coordinates end-processing and end-ligation during NHEJ through auto-phosphorylation3.

Normal lymphocyte development requires the assembly of functional antigen receptor genes from germline variable (V), diversity (D) and joining (J) gene segments through V(D)J recombination. V(D)J recombination is initiated by products of the recombination activating gene (RAG), which cleaves germline antigen receptor genes to generate a pair of blunt signalling ends (SEs) and a pair of hairpin coding ends (CEs)4. The two SEs are precisely joined by the core NHEJ factors to form a signalling joint (SJ), while the two hairpin CEs are first opened by DNA-PKcs and Artemis before being joined by the core NHEJ factors to generate a coding joint (CJ). The unique structures of CEs and SEs and the exclusive requirement for NHEJ during V(D)J recombination provide a sensitive and well-characterized physiological system to evaluate end-ligation and end-processing functions of the NHEJ factors. While loss of the conserved core NHEJ factor abrogates both CJs and SJs, complete loss of DNA-PKcs or Artemis only abrogates CJ formation. CJs comprise part of the exons encoding the antigen receptor genes and are thus required for lymphocyte development. As such, loss of all previously characterized NHEJ factors, except XLF (see below), abrogates lymphocyte development at the progenitor stage, leading to TB severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) in patients and animal models. RAG holds the DNA ends generated during V(D)J recombination in a post-synaptic complex, which promotes end-ligation in the absence of XLF5. In peripheral lymphoid organs (for example, the spleen), naive B cells further modify the constant region of the immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) through class switch recombination (CSR) to achieve different antibody effector functions. CSR is initiated by activation-induced deaminase. The DSB intermediates generated during CSR, which do not harbour hairpins, are joined together primarily by core NHEJ factors to complete CSR. Thus, loss of any core NHEJ factor, including XLF, leads to frequent IgH chromosomal breaks and reduces CSR efficiency by 50–75% (refs 6, 7, 8). In addition, post-mitotic neurons require NHEJ for survival. Complete loss of core NHEJ factors causes widespread neuronal apoptosis and eventually late embryonic lethality in Lig4- or XRCC4-deficient mice1,3,9,10,11. Efficient and accurate NHEJ on chromatinized DNA also requires ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase and ATM-mediated DNA damage responses6. While not essential for V(D)J recombination, loss of ATM or its substrates (for example, H2AX and 53BP1) abrogates chromosomal V(D)J recombination in XLF-deficient mice and cells, underscoring the intricate interaction between DNA damage response and core NHEJ factors12,13,14,15.

Paralog of XRCC4 and XLF (PAXX, also called C9ORF142 or XLS) was proposed as a NHEJ factor based on its structural similarity with XRCC4 and XLF16,17,18. Since patients or animal models with defects in PAXX are not yet found, the physiological function of PAXX remains largely unknown. XRCC4, XLF and PAXX all have an N-terminal globular head domain followed by a C-terminal coil-coiled stalk, and each forms stable homodimers via their respective coil-coiled stalks19,20. XRCC4 deficiency phenocopies Lig4 deficiency, likely because the stalk of the XRCC4 homodimer binds and stabilizes Lig4 protein. In contrast, the coiled-coil stalks of XLF and PAXX are much shorter and do not bind Lig4 directly16,17,21,22. While not absolutely required for NHEJ, XLF dimers promote end-ligation by forming high-order helical filaments with XRCC4 dimers through direct interactions between their respective head domains7,12,23,24. PAXX does not directly interact with either XLF or XRCC4. Instead, PAXX binds KU through a conserved C-terminal region16,17,18. A PAXX mutant that cannot bind to KU fails to rescue the severe IR sensitivity in human cells16,18. Notably, co-deletion of PAXX partially rescues the severe IR sensitivity of XRCC4-knockout DT40 cells17, but accentuates the zeocin sensitivity of XLF-deficient HCT116 cells24. The exact role of PAXX in NHEJ and DSB repair is yet to be demonstrated.

To elucidate the functions of PAXX in NHEJ and determine the physiological function of PAXX in vivo, we generated PAXX-deficient mice. Interestingly, although not required for NHEJ in otherwise wild-type mice, PAXX is essential for both chromosomal and extra-chromosomal end-ligation in Xlf-deficient animals. Our data further suggest that PAXX and XLF support NHEJ through distinct mechanisms, with PAXX facilitating the accumulation of KU at DNA ends and XLF enhancing the recruitment of Lig4 to achieve efficient end-ligation together.

Results

Generation of PAXX-deficient mice

To determine the physiological functions of PAXX, we generated Paxx knockout mice (Paxx−/−) by a gene targeting strategy in which all coding exons of the Paxx gene and part of the non-coding exon 1 were replaced by a Neomycin resistant (NeoR) cassette flanked by frt sequences (Fig. 1a). Correct targeting, which removes an EcoRV site within the Paxx gene, was confirmed by Southern blotting analyses (Fig. 1b). Eight independently targeted embryonic stem (ES) cell clones (in 129/sv background) were obtained and two were injected for germline transmission. The resulting chimeras were bred with ROSA26FLIP/FLIP mice expressing FLIPase constitutively25 (Jackson Laboratory, Stock No. 003946) to remove the NeoR cassette and generate Paxx+/− mice. Intercrosses between Paxx+/− mice produced Paxx−/− pups at the expected Mendelian ratio (Fig. 1c). Southern blotting confirmed complete deletion of the Paxx gene in Paxx−/− mice and western blotting validated the absence of PAXX protein in Paxx−/− murine embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) (Fig. 1d,e). Both male and female Paxx−/−mice are of normal size (Fig. 1f), and spontaneous tumour development has not yet been observed. Given the embryonic lethality and severe growth retardation of XRCC4- and KU-deficient mice, these data suggest that PAXX is not essential for end-ligation in mice.

Figure 1: Generation of Paxx−/− mice.
figure1

(a) The schematic diagram represents the murine Paxx locus (top), targeting vector (2nd row), targeted allele (3rd row) and the neo-deleted allele (Paxx, bottom). The 5′ and 3′ probe are marked as thick black lines. The exons and frt sites are shown as solid boxes and open triangles, respectively. Restriction site designation: RV=EcoRV. The map is not drawn to scale. (b) Southern blot analyses of EcoRV-digested DNA from WT and Paxx+/Targeted ES cells, blotted with the 3′ probe. (c) The number of live-birth mice obtained from intercrossing Paxx+/− mice. The P value was calculated with the chi-square test. (d) Western blot for PAXX in primary murine embryonic fibroblasts derived from E14.5 WT or Paxx−/− embryos. (e) Southern blot analyses of BamHI-digested DNA from Paxx+/+ and Paxx−/− mice tissue DNA and probed with mPaxx probe diagrammed in Fig. 5a. (f) The total body weight of Paxx+/+ and Paxx−/− littermates at 50 days of age. The data represent the average and s.d. of more than four mice of each genotype.

Lymphocyte development is normal in Paxx−/− mice

Since Xlf−/− mice develop normally, but have reduced lymphocyte cellularity and CSR defects7, we next analysed Paxx−/− mice for lymphocyte development. The weights and total cellularity of the thymus and spleens of 7–8-week-old Paxx−/− mice (4 male, 6 female) were indistinguishable from those of Paxx+/+ (4 male, 3 female) littermates (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Fig. 1A). Fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) analyses showed that the frequencies of immature pro-B (CD43+B220+IgM), pre-B (CD43B220+IgM), newly generated naive B (IgM+B220low) and re-circulating B (IgM+B220hi) cells in bone marrow from Paxx−/− mice were also comparable to those of Paxx+/+ mice (Fig. 2b and Supplementary Fig. 1C). Successful V(D)J recombination at the IgH locus is required for the transition from pro-B to pre-B cells. The ratio of bone marrow-derived pre-B/pro-B cells was the same in both Paxx−/− mice and their Paxx+/+ littermates (Fig. 2b). Likewise, the number and frequency of T-cell progenitors and mature T cells are also indistinguishable in Paxx−/− and Paxx+/+ mice (Fig. 2c and Supplementary Fig. 1B). Sequential rearrangements of the TCRα locus in CD4+CD8+ double positive (DP) thymocytes are coupled with both positive and negative selections, creating a stressful situation that reveals minor V(D)J recombination defects in ATM or 53BP1-deficient cells previously, indicated by reduced surface expression of TCRβ and its co-receptor CD3 in the DP cells26,27 (Supplementary Fig. 1D). Nevertheless, surface expression of TCRβ/CD3 in DP cells was not affected by PAXX deficiency (Fig. 2c). Consistent with normal lymphocyte development, endogenous V(D)J recombination junctions in Paxx−/− and Paxx+/+ mice are also indistinguishable (Supplementary Table 1). Moreover, CSR is not affected by Paxx deficiency. In vitro stimulation with bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and interleukin 4 (IL-4) induced robust CSR to IgG1, and expression of surface IgG1 in 30% of Paxx+/+ as well as Paxx−/− B cells in 4 days (Figs 2d,e and Supplementary Fig. 2A), while only 10% of Xlf−/− B cells express IgG1 at Day 4, consistent with 50–75% reduction in CSR7. Likewise, proliferation of in vitro-stimulated Paxx−/− and Paxx+/+ B cells is also similar (Supplementary Fig. 2B). Together, these results indicate that PAXX, unlike XLF and other NHEJ factors, is not required for either V(D)J recombination or CSR, two physiological gene rearrangements mediated by NHEJ.

Figure 2: Lymphocyte development in Paxx−/− mice.
figure2

(a) Weight and total cell count of thymus and spleen from Paxx+/+ and Paxx−/− littermates at 50 days of age (7–8 weeks). The data represent the average and s.d. of >3 mice of each genotype. (b,c) Representative flow cytometry analyses of 7–8-week-old Paxx+/+ and Paxx−/− mice. (d) Representative flow cytometry analysis of IL-4/LPS stimulated B cells (CD43 splenocytes) from Paxx+/+, Paxx−/− and Xlf−/− mice. (e) Statistical analyses of the class-switching results in d. Three biological repeats were performed for each genotype. The bar graphs represent the average and s.e.

Xlf−/−Paxx−/− mice die during embryonic development

Previous studies by us and others suggest that the apparently efficient chromosomal end-joining in XLF-deficient cells is quite vulnerable and requires both ATM and DNA-PK kinase activities and their substrates (for example, 53BP1 and H2AX)5,12,13,14,24,28. Given the structural similarity between PAXX and XLF, we asked whether PAXX is necessary for end-joining in Xlf−/− mice. Intercrossing double-heterozygous Xlf+/−Paxx+/− mice yielded Xlf−/−Paxx+/− and Xlf+/−Paxx−/− pups at the expected Mendelian ratios, similar to those of Xlf−/−Paxx+/+ and Xlf+/+Paxx−/− pups (Fig. 3a). However, double-homozygous Xlf−/−Paxx−/− progeny were not obtained, suggesting embryonic lethality (Fig. 3a). Embryonic lethality caused by Lig4 or Xrcc4 deficiency occurs shortly after embryonic day 15.5 (E15.5) with severe neuronal apoptosis3,9,10,11. Notably at E14.5, Xlf−/−Paxx−/− embryos, which were slightly smaller in size than their littermates, were found at the expected Mendelian ratios (Fig. 3b). Neuronal apoptosis, as indicated by condensed nuclei and positive staining for cleaved (activated) Caspase 3, was rare in Xlf−/− or Paxx−/− embryos and increased >40-fold in Xlf−/−Paxx−/− embryonic brains, to a level comparable to end-ligation defective Xrcc4−/− or DNA-PKcsKD/KD embryos (Fig. 3c,d)3,11. Moreover, apoptotic inclusions were most prominent in the post-mitotic intermediate zone, but not the proliferating ventricular zone, of Xlf−/−Paxx−/− embryos, in a manner reminiscent of Xrcc4−/− embryos29. Together, these findings reveal a critical role of PAXX in the survival of post-mitotic neurons and embryonic development in mice lacking XLF.

Figure 3: Embryonic lethality and severe neuronal apoptosis in Xlf−/−Paxx−/− mice.
figure3

(a) Live birth and E14.5 embryos obtained from intercross between Xlf and Paxx-deficient mice. (Upper table) All E14.5 embryo or birth with Xlf+/+ or Xlf+/− genotypes and various Paxx genotypes. (Lower table) All E14.5 embryos or birth with Xlf−/− genotypes. Xlf−/−Paxx−/− were not found at birth and found at expected ratio at E14.5 (P>0.5). The P value was calculated with the chi-square test. (b) Representative Xlf+/−Paxx+/− and littermate Xlf−/−Paxx−/− embryos at E14.5. The length of the scale bar is 1 cm. (c) Haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of E14.5 embryonic brains from littermate Xlf−/− or Xlf−/−Paxx−/− mice. The ventricular zone (VZ) contains the proliferating cells. The intermediate zone (IZ) and cortical plate (CP) contain post-mitotic neurons. Black arrowheads denote condensed nuclei. The scale bar in c stands for 100 μm. (d) Immunostaining of E14.5 embryonic brain using antibodies against Cleaved (activated) Caspase3. Brown staining represents apoptotic cells. The scale bar in d stands for 100 μm. (e) The frequency of condensed nuclei per 1/20 of × 400 field in E14.5 brain were quantified. The data represent nine different fields from at least two biological repeats of each genotype. The P value was calculated with the chi-square test.

Severe genomic instability in Xlf−/−Paxx−/− cells

To determine whether DNA repair defects and genomic instability contribute to the embryonic lethality of Xlf/Paxx double-deficient mice, we generated MEFs from E14.5 Xlf−/−Paxx−/− and control (wild type (WT) and Xlf- or Paxx single deficient) embryos. Consistent with our previous study30 and the normal development of Paxx−/− mice, the Paxx−/− and Xlf−/− primary MEFs proliferated at rates comparable to that of WT MEFs. In contrast, Xlf−/−Paxx−/− MEFs displayed severe proliferation defects and failed to thrive at early passages (Fig. 4a). Correspondingly, cell cycle analyses revealed 25% reduction (from 25 to 18%) in the percentage of S phase (BrdU+) cells from Xlf−/−Paxx−/− primary MEFs (Supplementary Fig. 3A). Despite normal proliferation, Paxx−/− MEFs were moderately, yet significantly, more sensitive to IR and Etoposide than Paxx+/+ cells, while less sensitive than Xlf−/− MEFs (Fig. 4b and Supplementary Fig. 3B). Meanwhile, Xlf−/−Paxx−/− MEFs were highly sensitive to IR and Etoposide, consistent with their severe proliferation defects (Fig. 4b). In addition, Paxx−/− and Xlf−/− primary MEFs are very moderately sensitive to hydroxyurea (HU) at the highest dose, while Xlf−/−Paxx−/− primary MEFs are not apparently sensitive to HU (Supplementary Fig. 3C). Since HU primarily targets replicating cells, the lack of HU sensitivity might be due to the lower frequency of S phase cells among Xlf−/−Paxx−/− primary MEFs (Supplementary Fig. 3A). Cytogenetic analyses of spontaneous genomic instability using telomere-specific fluorescence in situ hybridization (T-FISH) revealed that 18.9±2.6% Xlf−/−Paxx−/− primary MEFs had at least one cytogenetic abnormality, in comparison with only 2.0±0.1% in Xlf+/+Paxx+/+(WT), 3.4±0.3% in Paxx−/− and 9.6±0.1% in Xlf−/− primary MEFs (Fig. 4c and Supplementary Fig. 3D). T-FISH can distinguish two types of cytogenetic abnormalities31: (1) chromosomal breaks involving both sister chromatids, which reflect repair defects occurring in the G1 phase of the cell cycle, and (2) chromatid breaks involving only one chromatid, which reflect damage that occurs after DNA replication. Of note, almost all of the cytogenetic abnormalities in Xlf−/−Paxx−/− cells were chromosomal breaks (Fig. 4c and Supplementary Fig. 3D), similar to the cytogenetic defects observed in cells deficient for other core NHEJ factors. Together, these findings reveal a critical complementary function between PAXX and XLF in maintaining genomic stability during normal cell growth and in response to IR or etoposide challenges. The skew towards chromosomal breaks together with the presense of IR and etoposide hypersensitivity strongly suggest defects in the NHEJ pathway in Xlf−/−Paxx−/− cells.

Figure 4: Proliferation defects and IR hypersensitivity of Xlf−/−Paxx−/− MEFs.
figure4

(a,b) Proliferation and IR sensitivity assays were performed using P2 primary MEFs with different genotypes. Three independent repeats were performed. The average and s.d. were plotted. The Y axis is the relative cell number measured by hemocytometer (for a) or the fluorescence-based nucleotide dye (CyQuant Cell Proliferation Assay, Invitrogen, CA) (for b). (c) Left: the examples of normal chromosome, chromosomal breaks and chromatid breaks (one of two sister chromatids is broken). Middle: frequency of metaphases with one or more cytogenetic abnormalities in P1 primary MEFs of different genotypes. At least two independently derived lines were assayed for each genotype. The scale bar stands for 1 μm. Right: the frequency of chromatid (grey box) and chromosomal (white box) breaks measured by T-FISH analyses in P1 primary MEF of different genotypes. The average and s.d. of at least three independent biological repeats were shown. X−/−=Xlf−/−, P−/−=Paxx−/− and X−/−P−/−=Xlf−/−Paxx−/−. The P value was calculated by two-tailed Student’s t-test. The raw data were summarized in Supplementary Fig. 3D.

End-joining is abrogated in Xlf−/−Paxx−/− cells

To further characterize the function of PAXX and XLF in NHEJ, we used CRISPR/Cas9 technology to delete the entire murine Paxx gene from WT or Xlf−/−Eμ-Bcl2+ Abelson Murine Leukemia Virus (A-MuLV)-transformed pre-B cell lines (v-abl cells) (Fig. 5a). These CRISPR/Cas9-deleted cells are referred to as PaxxΔ/Δ, to distinguish them from germline Paxx−/− mice and cells. Successful deletion of the Paxx gene was monitored by Southern blotting (Fig. 5b) and the absence of PAXX protein was confirmed by western blot analyses (Fig. 5c). Consistent with the results from primary MEFs (Fig. 4b), v-abl kinase-transformed Xlf−/−PaxxΔ/Δ pre-B cells were hypersensitive to IR, similar to the Xrcc4−/− control, while PaxxΔ/Δ pre-B cells are, at most, moderately sensitive to IR (Fig. 5d). Also consistent with the data from MEFs, Xlf−/−PaxxΔ/Δ pre-B cells display higher levels of spontaneous genomic instability, especially chromosomal breaks (Fig. 5e and Supplementary Fig. 3E).

Figure 5: Generation and characterization of isogenic Xlf−/−PaxxΔ/Δ pre-B cell lines.
figure5

(a) Scheme for murine Paxx locus and CRISPR/Cas9 mediated knockout strategy. The open triangles indicate the location of the guided RNA. The horizontal arrows indicate the location of the primers used for primary screen. Southern blot confirmation was performed using BamHI-digested DNA with the mPaxx probe (show as thick black line). (b,c) Southern blot and western blot assays confirmed the homozygous deletion of Paxx and the absence of Paxx protein in WT or Xlf−/− v-abl transformed pre-B cells with inverted substrates. (d) IR sensitivity of WT, Paxx−/−, Xlf−/−, Xlf−/− PaxxΔ/Δ and Xrcc4−/− pre-B cells measured, determined by cell counting. At least triplicates were plated and counted for each genotype at each dosage. (e) Left: frequency of metaphases with cytogenetic abnormalities of WT, Xlf−/− or Xlf−/−PaxxΔ/Δ v-abl transformed pre-B cells. At least three independent experiments were performed. The data represent the average and the s.d. of the three repeats. Right: the frequency of chromatid (grey box) and chromosomal (white box) breaks measured by T-FISH analyses in the pre-B cells. The raw data were summarized in Supplementary Fig. 3E. X−/−=Xlf−/−, PΔ/Δ=PaxxΔ/Δ and X−/−PΔ/Δ=Xlf−/−PaxxΔ/Δ.

To measure NHEJ function specifically, we utilized the chromosomal V(D)J recombination assay15. In this system, v-abl kinase inhibitor STI571 (also called Gleevec) induces a G1 phase cell cycle arrest in the v-abl cells that allows accumulation of RAG protein, which initiates efficient V(D)J recombination at a chromosomal integrated pMX-INV inversional substrate15. pMX-INV contains an inverted green fluorescent protein (GFP) cassette flanked by recombination signal sequences (RSS, triangles in Fig. 6a) that can be cleaved and inverted back to the same orientation as the promoter by RAG-mediated recombination reaction. NHEJ-mediated repair and the formation of both SJs and CJs are necessary and sufficient for the expression of GFP protein (Fig. 6a)3,15. Using this assay, we found that the integrated pMX-INV substrate was rearranged robustly in two isogenic clones of PaxxΔ/Δ cells derived from parental WTInv4 cells (pMX-INV at the same genomic locus in both WT and PaxxΔ/Δ cells), as measured by the appearance of CJs in Southern blots (Fig. 6b and Supplementary Fig. 4B) and the accumulation of GFP expressing cells by FACS (Supplementary Fig. 4A). Thus, PAXX itself is not required for chromosomal V(D)J recombination. In contrast, while parental Xlf−/− cells can be induced to express GFP efficiently, Xlf−/−PaxxΔ/Δ cells failed to express GFP upon STI571 induction and accumulated both 3′-CEs and the small CEs–SEs fragment similar to those seen in Xrcc4−/− cells, indicative of end-ligation defects (Supplementary Fig. 4A and Fig. 6c). Ectopic expression of either PAXX or XLF protein in Xlf−/−PaxxΔ/Δ B cells restored V(D)J recombination, supporting the specificity of Paxx deletion by CRISPR/Cas9 (Fig. 6d, Supplementary Fig. 4C). Moreover, Xlf−/−PaxxΔ/Δ B cells, similar to Xrcc4−/− cells, also failed to repair chromosomal DSBs generated by Ppo1 endonuclease, indicating that their end-ligation defects are not limited to V(D)J recombination (Fig. 6e). These findings, together with the severe neuronal apoptosis of Xlf−/−Paxx−/− mice, reveal a critical function for PAXX in NHEJ-mediated end-ligation that is otherwise masked by XLF.

Figure 6: V(D)J recombination and end-joining defects in Xlf−/−PaxxΔ/Δ cells.
figure6

(a) Schematic of pMX-INV V(D)J recombination substrates15 (diagram modified from Zha et al.12). The unrearranged substrate (UR), hybrid joins (HJs), coding/signal end (CE/SE) intermediates and coding/signal joins (CJs/SJs) are diagrammed. The recombination signal sequence (RSS, triangle), GFP probe (solid lines) and hCD4 probe (dash lines) are indicated. Positions of EcoRV (RV) sites and NcoI (N) sites are shown. The red box shows the isolated SE–CE fragments resulting from complete end-ligation defects. The blue box shows the SJ–CE fragments resulting from isolated CJ formation defects (for example, hairpin opening defects in DNA-PKcs−/− cells)3. (bd) Southern blot analyses of pMX-INV rearrangement products and intermediates. The digestion and probes are marked on the side of the blots. The WT and the two independently derived PaxxΔ/Δ lines in b have the pMX-INV substrates integrated at the same genomic location. And the Xlf−/− and isogenic Xlf−/−PaxxΔ/Δ derivative have their pMX-INV integrated in the same genomic locus. Xrcc4−/− cells were included as a control. (e) Diagram of PpoI-mediated cleavage in one mouse genomic DNA site on chromosome 1. H3=Hind III. The dark line indicates the position of the probe designed to detect DNA ends. Lower: Southern blot analyses for unrepaired ends from representative cells with HindIII-digested DNA.

PAXX and XLF have distinct functions during NHEJ

Given their structural similarities, it is conceivable that PAXX and XLF are functionally equivalent. However, ATM (KU55933) or DNA-PK (NU7441) kinase inhibitors did not block the formation of CJ products or the expression of GFP in Paxx−/− cells, despite the fact that Xlf−/− pre-B cells require both ATM and DNA-PK kinase activity for efficient V(D)J recombination (Figs 6b and 7a, and Supplementary Fig. 4A)12,28. Moreover, overexpression of PAXX was not sufficient to rescue the end-ligation defects caused by ATM inhibition in Xlf-deficient cells (Supplementary Fig. 4A). Together these findings suggest that PAXX cannot replace XLF, and XLF and PAXX likely have distinct functions during NHEJ.

Figure 7: PAXX and XLF have distinct functions during NHEJ.
figure7

(a) Southern blot analyses of the product and intermediates of pMX-INV V(D)J recombination reporter in WT, Xlf−/− and PaxxΔ/Δ cells with or without ATM kinase inhibitor (KU55933, 15 μM) or DNA-PKcs inhibitor (NU7441, 5 μM) added 1 h before STI571 (3 μM). (b) Western blot for phosphorylated KAP1, total KAP1 and β-actin in total lysate from pre-B cells immediately after irradiation (at 1, 5 or 10 Gy). (c) Extrachromosomal SJ formation efficiencies in WT, PaxxΔ/Δ, Xlf−/− and Xlf−/−PaxxΔ/Δ Pre-B cells. Each box represents the average and s.d. of four independent repeats. Box centre line is plotted at the median and the box extends from the 25th to 75th percentiles. Whiskers go down to the smallest value and up to the largest value. The raw data were summarized in Supplementary Fig. 5A. The P value was calculated by two-tailed Student’s t-test. (d) Laser-induced recruitment of GFP-PAXX or DsRed-PCNA in immortalized Ku80−/− MEFs with or without ectopic expression of full-length (FL) Ku80 or C-terminal truncated Ku80 (ΔCTD). Ten cells were tested for each genotype and representive images are shown here. (e) Laser-induced recruitment of GFP-Ku70 in immortalized WT, Xlf−/−, Paxx−/− and Xlf−/− Paxx−/− MEFs 1 min after damage. P<0.001 between Paxx−/− and WT cells, P<0.05 between Xlf−/− Paxx−/− and WT cells, two-way ANOVA (f) Laser-induced recruitment of GFP-Lig4 in immortalized WT, Xlf−/−, Paxx−/− and Xlf−/− Paxx−/− MEFs 1 min after damage. P<0.001 between Xlf−/− and WT cells, P<0.01 between Paxx−/− and WT cells, P<0.001 between Xlf−/− Paxx−/− and WT cells, two-way ANOVA. The bar graphs of e,f represent the average and error bars stand for s.d. (see Methods for details), same experiments were repeated for at least two times. The scale bar in d stands for 10 μm. (g) Working model. In this model, we propose that XLF (diagrammed as red bean sprout shape) enhances the efficient accumulation of Lig4 in complex with XRCC4 at the DNA ends, while PAXX (diagrammed as green bean sprout shape) promotes the accumulation of KU at the DNA ends. Together PAXX and XLF promote efficient DNA end-ligation through distinct mechanisms. XR4, XRCC4; Art, Artemis.

Given Xlf−/− cells require ATM as well as PAXX for end-ligation, we asked whether PAXX affects ATM activation. IR- or camptothecin (CPT)-induced phosphorylation of specific ATM substrate KAP1 was unaffected in Paxx−/− cells (Fig. 7b and Supplementary Fig. 5B). Moreover, while ATM is required for chromosomal end-ligation and dispensable for end-ligation of extra-chromosomal (episomal) DNA in XLF-deficient cells12, both chromosomal and extra-chromosomal SJs formation decreased nearly 100-fold in Xlf−/−PaxxΔ/Δ cells, in comparison with WT or Xlf−/− or PaxxΔ/Δ single deficient cells (Fig. 7c and Supplementary Fig. 5A). Together, these results suggest a direct function of PAXX in DNA end-ligation that is distinct from both ATM and XLF.

PAXX promotes the accumulation of KU at DNA ends in vivo

KU, especially the conserved N-terminal regions required for hetero-dimerization, is conserved through evolution and is essential for DNA end-ligation in vivo and in vitro. PAXX binds to KU directly16,17 and is rapidly recruited to DNA damage sites. So we tested whether KU is essential for the recruitment of PAXX to the DSB in vivo. GFP-PAXX was efficiently recruited to the site of laser-induced DNA lesions in Ku80+/+, but not in Ku80−/− MEFs (Fig. 7d). Moreover both full-length KU80 and a truncated KU80 lacking the flexible C-terminal domain (ΔCTD) implicated in DNA-PKcs binding, fully restored PAXX recruitment (Fig. 7d and Supplementary Fig. 5C), suggesting PAXX binds to the conserved N-terminal region of KU. Given the importance of KU in end-ligation, we next asked whether PAXX affects KU dynamics in vivo and found that loss of PAXX, but not the loss of XLF, significantly reduced the intensity of GFP-KU70 at DSBs in vivo (Fig. 7e). Correspondingly, the intensity of GFP-KU70 also reduced significantly in Xlf−/−Paxx−/− MEFs, although consistently higher than in Paxx−/− cells, likely caused by the continuous recruitment of KU due to persistent breaks in Xlf−/−Paxx−/− cells (Fig. 7e). Meanwhile, the level of GFP-Lig4 is markedly reduced in Xlf−/− MEFs and nearly absent in Xlf−/−Paxx−/− cells (Fig. 7f). At the same time, the recruitment of GFP-Lig4 is at most moderately affected in Paxx−/− cells, which is likely secondary to the KU-recruitment defects (Fig. 7f). Together these data suggest a model in which PAXX promotes robust recruitment of KU, while XLF enhances the recruitment of Lig4, and together they ensure efficient end-ligation through distinct yet complementary mechanisms (Fig. 7g).

Discussion

PAXX was recently proposed to function as a NHEJ factor on the basis of its structural homology to XRCC4 and XLF, and the IR sensitivity of PAXX-depleted human tumour lines. Unexpectedly, we found that PAXX is largely dispensable for NHEJ in mice under physiological conditions. Lymphocyte development, including both V(D)J recombination and CSR, as well as the general NHEJ repair activity required for maintenance and expansion of peripheral lymphocytes, are not affected by the loss of PAXX. Accordingly, PAXX-deficient primary MEFs proliferated well in culture and did not accumulate significantly more spontaneous chromosomal breaks than WT controls. Yet PAXX-deficient primary MEFs or v-abl kinase-transformed B cells displayed a moderate, but significant, sensitivity to IR. These data indicate that PAXX serves as a genomic caretaker that is largely dispensable under physiological conditions, and instead functions to ensure genomic integrity under stresses or in selective genetic backgrounds. One of these conditions would be XLF deficiency. While neither PAXX nor XLF alone is essential for murine development or lymphocyte V(D)J recombination, Paxx−/− mice require XLF and Xlf−/− mice require PAXX for end-ligation. As such, Xlf−/−Paxx−/− mice died during late embryonic development with severe neuronal apoptosis similar to Lig4−/− or Xrcc4−/− mice10,11. Xlf−/−Paxx−/− primary MEFs accumulate high levels of chromosomal breaks, leading to cell cycle arrest, and eventually fail to thrive. Xlf−/−PaxxΔ/Δ lymphocytes cannot complete V(D)J recombination and thus accumulate unrepaired SEs and CEs. Notably, both chromosomal and extra-chromosomal end-joining were abolished in Xlf−/−PaxxΔ/Δ cells, supporting a role of PAXX in DNA end-ligation directly. Accordingly, we found that PAXX, but not XLF promotes the maximal recruitment of KU to DNA ends in vivo. Taken together, our findings identified distinct, yet complementary functions of two core NHEJ factors—PAXX and XLF in end-ligation and revealed an intricate regulation of the NHEJ pathway. Consistent with our findings, two recent studies using B-cell lines with CRISPR-Cas9 knockout of PAXX and XLF also revealed their redundant function in end-joining32,33.

PAXX shares structural similarity with both XRCC4 and XLF. Unlike XRCC4 (refs 34, 35), both PAXX and XLF have relatively short coiled-coil stalks that cannot bind to Lig4 directly and are not absolutely required for end-ligation. In vivo, loss of either XLF or PAXX has negligible effects on the survival of post-mitotic neurons (Fig. 3e), proliferation of primary MEFs (Fig. 4a), or chromosomal V(D)J recombination in developing lymphocytes (Fig. 6). While these phenotypes are strikingly similar, there are notable differences. Loss of XLF reduced the cellularity of peripheral lymphoid organs and caused a 50% reduction in CSR30, while PAXX deficiency has no measurable impact on CSR or the cellularity and growth of lymphoid organs (Fig. 2)32. In addition, XLF-deficient MEFs exhibit spontaneous genomic instability, while PAXX-deficiency did not lead to statistically significant increases in genomic instability (Fig. 4). Moreover, PAXX-deficient MEFs exhibit little, if any, sensitivity to IR, in contrast to the moderate IR sensitivity of XLF-deficient cells (Figs 4 and 5). Most strikingly, ATM and DNA-PKcs kinase activities are required for chromosomal end-joining in XLF-deficient cells, but are dispensable in PAXX-deficient cells (Fig. 7). At the molecular level, XLF forms filamental structures with XRCC4, which promotes Lig4 re-adenylation in vitro36. Here we found that XLF also promotes efficient recruitment of Lig4 in vivo without affecting KU (Fig. 7f). In contrast, PAXX binds directly to DNA-bound KU and promotes accumulation of KU at DSBs in a reciprocal manner (Fig. 7e). Based on these data, we proposed that while XLF and PAXX have important complementary activities, they function in distinct protein complexes, and through different mechanisms to ensure end-ligation (Fig. 7g).

So what is the role of PAXX in end-joining? Like DNA-PKcs, PAXX interacts with DNA bound KU, but not free KU. But in contrast to DNA-PKcs, which interacts with the C-terminal tails of Ku80, PAXX requires the core of KU, but not the Ku80 C-terminal domain, for its recruitment to DNA damage sites (Fig. 7). We found that in the absence of PAXX, the maximum intensity of GFP-Ku70 at the DNA damage site reduced significantly (Fig. 7). Given KU is essential for the initial recruitment of PAXX, we postulate that PAXX might stabilize KU at the DNA ends, rather than affecting the initial recruitment of KU to DNA. Since Ku deletion rescues the embryonic lethality of Lig4-deficient mice37, presumably by allowing the alternative end-joining (A-EJ) pathway to access the DNA ends, this role of PAXX in stabilizing KU might explain why knockout of Paxx in Xrcc4−/− chicken DT40 cells partially rescues the severe IR sensitivity17. If so, why do Xlf−/−Paxx−/− embryos die of severe neuronal apoptosis? We note that the intensity of Lig4 foci is lowest in Xlf−/−Paxx−/− cells, while the intensity of Ku foci is actually higher in Xlf−/−Paxx−/− cells than in Paxx−/− cells (Fig. 7e,f), likely due to the continuous recruitment of KU in the absence of DNA repair. This recruitment pattern in Xlf−/−Paxx−/− cells (the presence of KU without Lig4) is similar to that found in the Lig4−/− cells, where both NHEJ (due to Lig4 deficiency) and A-EJ (due to the presence of KU) are limited, and might explain the severe end-ligation defects and embryonic lethality of Xlf−/−Paxx−/− mice. In this context, the sensitivity to genotoxic agents or spontaneous damages would be determined by a balance and availability of NHEJ and A-EJ to given types of breaks. Given the robust NHEJ in Paxx−/− mice, PAXX-dependent stabilization of KU at DNA ends is clearly not essential for NHEJ in otherwise WT cells. This function of PAXX becomes critical when XLF is also absent in the cells. XLF-deficient cells also require ATM, DNA-PKcs, 53BP1 and H2AX for end ligation5,12,13,14,24,28. In addition, the C terminus of the RAG2 protein is required for chromosomal V(D)J recombination specifically in XLF-deficient cells28. ATM and its substrates are thought to increase DNA end stability while the C terminus of RAG has been proposed to facilitate end-ligation in XLF-deficient cells during V(D)J recombination by stabilizing the post-cleavage complex embracing the DNA ends15,38. Therefore, it is conceivable that PAXX might also facilitate end-ligation by promoting end stability and synapsis similar to RAG2 during V(D)J recombination and to ATM/DNA-PK through their chromatin-bound substrates. Consistent with their similar function, end-ligation in the PAXX-deficient cells is not further affected by loss of ATM or DNA-PK kinase activity or in RAG-independent breaks (Figs 6e and 7a)32,33. KU has been proposed to have synaptic function through the recruitment and intermolecular phosphorylation of DNA-PKcs39,40. Given the direct interaction between PAXX and KU and the role of PAXX in the accumulation of KU at DSBs in vivo (Fig. 7d,e), it is tempting to speculate that PAXX modulates the stability of the DNA-PKcs/KU-DNA complex to promote end-synapsis and support end-ligation in XLF-deficient cells. Consistent with this model, inhibiting DNA-PK kinase activity has no additional impact on end-ligation in Paxx−/− cells (Fig. 7a).

PAXX is the first bona fide NHEJ factor that was not firstly identified in patients or as naturally occurring mutations in another organism. Patients with loss-of-function mutations of Lig4, XRCC4, XLF, Artemis and DNA-PKcs develop SCID and variable levels of microcephaly1,2. Given the severe IR sensitivity observed in PAXX-depleted human tumour lines, patients with PAXX deficiencies have been expected. Yet, the mild phenotype of Paxx−/− mice suggests that PAXX deficiency might not be readily recognized. While the precise reason for the strong dependence on PAXX in NHEJ in human cancer cell lines and the dispensable role of PAXX in mice in vivo is yet to be determined, species differences are unlikely to be the only explanation. While in U2OS cells and 293H cells, PAXX deficiency causes severe IR sensitivity, loss of PAXX causes only moderate, if any, IR sensitivity in human colorectal cancer HCT116 cells and 293 cells17,24. It is possible that genetic heterogeneity, including the availability of other repair factors might contribute to this variability. So what would be the physiologic function of the evolutionarily conserved PAXX gene? One possibility is that PAXX may promote tumour suppression or prevent premature aging in long-living organisms. While lymphocyte numbers are only moderately reduced in young XLF-deficient mice, old XLF-deficient mice (24 mos.) display rapid reduction of lymphocyte numbers owing to decreased renewal and function of the hematopoietic cells41. If a similar phenotype is observed in older Paxx−/− mice, then PAXX-deficient patients, if they exist, might present premature ageing phenotypes such as late-onset immunodeficiency or myeloid proliferative diseases. Except rare truncating mutations in the C-terminal KU-binding region of PAXX, the PAXX (C9Orf142) gene is amplified and overexpressed in several human cancers (cBioPortal), suggesting that PAXX function might modulate the therapeutic responses to genotoxic cancer therapies, such as radiation.

Methods

Mice

To generate Paxx−/− mice, a targeting construct was made to replace part of Exon 1 (after ATG) and exons 2–7 of the Paxx gene with a neomycin resistance gene. To generate the Paxx targeting construct, 5′ (2 kb) and 3′ (3.4 kb, with HindIII linker) arms were PCR amplified from 129/Sv murine ES cell DNA with high fidelity DNA polymerase (Phusion, NEB), cloned into pGEMT shuttle vectors (Promega) and sequenced (Genewiz). The primers used for the PCR are listed in Supplementary Table 2. The 5′arm and 3′arm were then released and subcloned to the pEMC targeting vector with NeoR flanked by frt sites using HindIII or NotI respectively. The final vector was validated by sequencing and restriction digestions. ClaI-linearized pEMC-PAXX plasmid was electroporated into CSL3 murine ES cells (129/Sv) and selected with G418 (300 μg ml−1) and Ganciclovir (Sigma G2566, 2 μM) for 7 days. The correct targeted clones were identified by Southern blotting analyses using EcoRV-digested genomic DNA and a 3′ genomic probe as outlined in Fig. 1a (the primers used to generate the probe are listed in Supplementary Table.2). The WT band is 4.7 kb, and the targeting destroys one of the EcoRV site in Exon 3, resulting in a 7.0 kb band. A total of eight independent targeted ES cells were obtained and two were injected for germline transmission and yielded identical phenotypes. Genotyping was performed with primers listed in Supplementary Table 2. Primers used to generate the mPAXX probes are also listed in Supplementary Table 2. Xlf−/− mice7,42 were bred to Paxx−/− mice to generate Xlf−/−Paxx−/− mice and 53BP1−/− mice43 (Supplementary Fig. 1D) were used as a control for thymocyte development defects. Both male and female mice were used in all experiments. All animal work has been conducted in a specific pathogen-free facility and all the procedures were approved by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at Columbia University Medical Center.

Lymphocyte development and recombination

Single-cell suspensions were prepared from lymphocytes of thymus (Thy), bone marrow (BM), spleen (Spl) and lymph node (LN) from 7-week-old mice of the described genotypes and 1 × 105 cells were stained using fluorescence-conjugated antibodies as indicated before analysed by flow cytometry. For Class Switch Recombination assay, single-cell suspensions of spleen cells were sorted with CD43 magnetic beads (MACS, Miltenyi), and B cells were cultured at a density of 5 × 105 cells per ml in RPMI medium supplemented with 10% FBS and 25 ng ml−1 of LPS plus 25 ng ml−1 of IL-4 (R&D). Cultured cells were maintained daily at a density of 1 × 106 cells per ml. Cells were collected on various days for flow cytometry. Single-cell suspensions from spleens were prepared according to the standard methods from mice 6 to 12 weeks old. Cells from cultures on day 4 were washed twice in PBS plus 2% FBS and were stained with various antibodies conjugated with fluorescein isothiocyanate (IgG1, BD Pharmingen and B220, eBioscience). Flow cytometry was performed on a FACS Calibur flow cytometer (BD Bioscience) and data were processed using FlowJo software package.

Endogenous Vbeta14DJbeta1 junction analyses

Vbeta14DJbeta1 coding joins were amplified from total thymocyte DNA with the following primers: Vbeta14F: 5′-AGAGTCGGTGGTGCAACTGAACCT-3′ and Jb1.2 R: 5′-CCTGACTTCCACCCGAGGTTC-3′. Two amplicons were identified from each sample corresponding to rearrangement involving Jβ1.1 or Jβ1.2. The two amplicons were gel-purified separately and cloned into a pGEM-T Easy Vector (Promega) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Individual clones were sequenced with the built-in T7 primer site and aligned with the Vβ14 and Jβ sequence (accession no. AE000665). Sequence analyses identified the V, D, J coding region first, then identified Palindromic (P) element and non-template nucleotide addition (N). The number of nucleotide deletions for the V–D junction and D–J junctions were also calculated (Supplementary Table.1).

Histological analyses

Embryo heads were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, paraffin embedded, serially sectioned (sagittal, 5 μm) and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) or cleaved Caspase-3 (Cat#9664, Cell Signaling) in the standard histopathology core of Columbia University.

Proliferation and chemosensitivity

Primary MEFs isolated from E14.5 embryos were designated passage 0 (P0) and were cultured in DMEM medium (GIBCO, Life Technology) containing 15% fetal bovine serum, 100 mM L-glutamine, and penicillin–streptomycin on a gelatinized plate until they reached confluence. Equal numbers of cells (1 × 104) were plated into a well of a six-well plate. The medium was changed daily and MEFs were counted at different time points in triplicate using a hemocytometer.

For IR, etoposide and HU sensitivity assays, cells were plated on 96-well plates 24 h before irradiation or the addition of genotoxic agents (etoposide: 0.01, 0.1 and 1 μM; hydroxyurea: 20, 200 and 2,000 mM. The drug was washed away 24 h after the treatment). The relative cell density was determined 7 days after irradiation or drug treatment by fluorescence nucleotide dye CyQuant (MEFs) or by hemocytometer (v-abl transformed pre-B cells).

For cell cycle analyses, proliferating primary MEF cells were incorporated with 10 μM BrdU for 30 min and fixed and then stained with Anti-BrdU FITC (Cat# 11-5071-41, eBioscience) and propidium iodide (PI) and analysed by flow cytometry

Metaphase preparation and telomere-FISH staining

The metaphase was prepared as previously described3. Briefly, cells were cultured for 6 (primary MEF) or 3 (v-abl transformed pre-B cells) hours with colcemid (KaryoMAX Colcemid Solution, GIBCO) to the final concentration of 100 ng ml−1. The treated cells were then collected and swollen using hypotonic solution at room temperature and fixed (fresh fixative made by 3:1 v/v methanol: acetic acid). Metaphase spreads were obtained by dropping fixed cells onto pre-cleaned slides. Slides were fixed in 4% (w/v) formaldehyde/PBS, followed by three washes with PBS and digestion with pepsin/PBS (0.1%; Sigma). The slides were then washed three times in PBS and dehydrated through ethanol, serially. A Cy3-labelled (CCCTAA)3 peptide nucleic acid (PNA) probe (customer synthesized, Biosynthesis Inc.) was used to hybridize the metaphases under denaturing conditions (heating for 3 min at 80 °C on a heat block) and incubated in a dark humidity chamber for 2 h. The slides were washed and dehydrated in ethanol and air dried. DNA was counterstained with DAPI. A minimum of 100 cells with telomere signals were captured by Metafer4 using Metasystems automatic Metaphase search and scan system equipped with a Plan Fluor Nikon Lens (× 63/1.30 Oil, Japan) and counted for breaks.

Cas9-mediated deletion of Paxx

A pair of guide RNAs (gRNA) targeting the mouse Paxx gene were designed and cloned into the pX330 CRISPR plasmid (generously provided by Dr Feng Zhang through Addgene) (gRNA1: 5′-CACCGCTAAGGTGTTCGCTCGGCGG-3′; gRNA2: 5′-CACCGCAGTTTATTTGACGGAGAA-3′). The pair of gRNA containing plasmids were electroporated into v-abl kinase-transformed WT or Xlf−/− v-abl transformed pre-B cells using the 4D Nucleofector apparatus (Buffer SF, program DN100, Lonza, Walkersville, MD). The cells were plated for single clones, and PCR (5′-ATTGAAGAGCGGCAGATATGT-3′ and 5′-ACGCAGAATCAACACAGTAGGT-3′) was performed on each single clone to identify the deletion. When necessary, heterozygous targeted clones were targeted a second time to remove the second allele. Complete deletion was verified by PCR, Southern blot and western blot.

Construction of plasmids

pBMN-IRES-GFP was purchased from Addgene and the GFP was replaced by a truncated humanCD2 fragment to generate pBMN-IRES-hCD2, a Flag sequence was then inserted in front of the multiple cloning site of pBMN-IRES-hCD2 to generate pBMNFlag-IRES-hCD2. Full-length mouse PAXX was inserted into the EcoRI digested pBMNFlag-IRES-hCD2. pBMN-XLF-IRES-hCD2 and pBMN-FLAG-KU80-IRES-hCD2 and pBMN-FLAG-KU80ΔCTD-IRES-hCD2 were described previously3,13.

Western blot and antibodies

Cell or tissue lysates were prepared in RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% SDS and 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 1% NP40 and fresh proteinase inhibitor cocktail). Protein extracts were analysed by western blotting according to the standard protocols using primary antibodies specific for PAXX (ab126353, Abcam, 1:1,000 dilution), XLF (A300-730A-1, Bethyl Laboratories, 1:1,000 dilution), Flag (M2, Sigma-Aldrich, 1:10,000 dilution), KAP1 (ab10484, Abcam, 1:1,000 dilution), phospho-KAP1 (ab70369, Abcam, 1:1,000 dilution). HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit and mouse secondary antibodies (GE Healthcare) were used and signal was detected using an ECL western blotting detection system (GE Healthcare). Uncropped images of all blots are available in Supplementary Fig. 6.

Laser-induced recruitment of non-homologous end-joining factors

Immortalized WT, Ku80−/−, Xlf−/−, Paxx−/− or Xlf−/−Paxx−/− MEFs were seeded onto glass bottom 35 mm diameter plates at about 104cells per plate. Transient transfection of 1 μg GFP-Ku70 or 1 μg GFP-PAXX or 1 μg GFP-Lig4, respectively, with 1 μg DsRed-PCNA were conducted using Lipofectamine 2000 (ThermoFisher) following the manufacturer’s instruction. To obtain reliable recruitment of GFP-Lig4 with the 405 nm laser, the transfected cells were sensitized with 10 μM of BrdU overnight before imaging. Live cell imaging combining laser micro-irradiation with confocal microscope was carried out using Nikon Ti Eclipse inverted microscope (Nikon, Inc.) equipped with A1 RMP (Nikon, Inc.) confocal microscope system (Nikon, Inc.) and Lu-N3 Laser Units (Nikon, Inc.). Laser micro-irradiation manipulation and time-lapse imaging was performed with the NIS Element High Content Analysis software (Nikon, Inc.), using a 405 nm laser with 100% energy level (output power on sample 110 μW, adequate for Ku70 accumulation). Relative intensity at laser-damaged sites was calculated as the mean value of the ratio of intensity of each micro-irradiation damaged sites to whole nucleus background. More than 10 individual cells were randomly chosen, tested and analysed for each data point. Mean value, standard deviation and outliers were calculated with Excel and GraphPad Prism online tools. For GFP-Ku70 recruitment, WT shows the average of 9 cells, Xlf−/− shows the average of 12 cells, Paxx−/− shows the average of 21 cells and Xlf−/− Paxx−/− shows the average of 12 cells. For GFP-Lig4 recruitment, WT shows the average of 10 cells, Xlf−/− shows the average of 8 cells, Paxx−/− shows the average of 11 cells and Xlf−/− Paxx−/− shows the average of 10 cells. In both GFP-Ku70 and GFP-lig4 recruitment, results of Xlf−/−, Paxx−/− and Xlf−/− Paxx−/− MEFs were compared with WT with two-way ANOVA to calculate the P value.

Transient V(D)J recombination assay

Extra-chromosomal V(D)J recombination assays were performed in v-abl transformed cell lines by transfection with JH200 (signal join) substrate plasmids as previously described.3 V(D)J recombination efficiency was determined by the number of chloramphenicol–ampicillin double-resistant bacterial colonies among the total ampicillin-resistant colonies. The relative efficiency of SJ formation was calculated by setting the chloramphenicol–ampicillin double-resistant/total ampicillin-resistant colonies in the WT cells in each biological replicate as 100%.

Data availability

Vβ14 and Jβ sequence is available from the NCBI under Accession No. AE000665. The authors declare that all data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Liu, X. et al. PAXX promotes KU accumulation at DNA breaks and is essential for end-joining in XLF-deficient mice. Nat. Commun. 8, 13816 doi: 10.1038/ncomms13816 (2017).

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1

    Lieber, M. R. The mechanism of double-strand DNA break repair by the nonhomologous DNA end-joining pathway. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 79, 181–211 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Woodbine, L., Gennery, A. R. & Jeggo, P. A. The clinical impact of deficiency in DNA non-homologous end-joining. DNA Repair 16, 84–96 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Jiang, W. et al. Differential phosphorylation of DNA-PKcs regulates the interplay between end-processing and end-ligation during nonhomologous end-joining. Mol. Cell 58, 172–185 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Bassing, C. H., Swat, W. & Alt, F. W. The mechanism and regulation of chromosomal V(D)J recombination. Cell 109, (Suppl) S45–S55 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Lescale, C. et al. RAG2 and XLF/Cernunnos interplay reveals a novel role for the RAG complex in DNA repair. Nat. Commun. 7, 10529 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Franco, S., Alt, F. W. & Manis, J. P. Pathways that suppress programmed DNA breaks from progressing to chromosomal breaks and translocations. DNA Repair 5, 1030–1041 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Li, G. et al. Lymphocyte-specific compensation for XLF/cernunnos end-joining functions in V(D)J recombination. Mol. Cell 31, 631–640 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Boboila, C. et al. Alternative end-joining catalyzes class switch recombination in the absence of both Ku70 and DNA ligase 4. J. Exp. Med. 207, 417–427 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Frank, K. M. et al. Late embryonic lethality and impaired V(D)J recombination in mice lacking DNA ligase IV. Nature 396, 173–177 (1998).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Frank, K. M. et al. DNA ligase IV deficiency in mice leads to defective neurogenesis and embryonic lethality via the p53 pathway. Mol. Cell 5, 993–1002 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Gao, Y. et al. A critical role for DNA end-joining proteins in both lymphogenesis and neurogenesis. Cell 95, 891–902 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Zha, S. et al. ATM damage response and XLF repair factor are functionally redundant in joining DNA breaks. Nature 469, 250–254 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Liu, X. et al. Overlapping functions between XLF repair protein and 53BP1 DNA damage response factor in end joining and lymphocyte development. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 3903–3908 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Oksenych, V. et al. Functional redundancy between repair factor XLF and damage response mediator 53BP1 in V(D)J recombination and DNA repair. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 2455–2460 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Bredemeyer, A. L. et al. ATM stabilizes DNA double-strand-break complexes during V(D)J recombination. Nature 442, 466–470 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Ochi, T. et al. DNA repair. PAXX, a paralog of XRCC4 and XLF, interacts with Ku to promote DNA double-strand break repair. Science 347, 185–188 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Xing, M. et al. Interactome analysis identifies a new paralogue of XRCC4 in non-homologous end joining DNA repair pathway. Nat. Commun. 6, 6233 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Craxton, A. et al. XLS (c9orf142) is a new component of mammalian DNA double-stranded break repair. Cell Death Differ. 22, 890–897 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Li, Y. et al. Crystal structure of human XLF/Cernunnos reveals unexpected differences from XRCC4 with implications for NHEJ. EMBO J. 27, 290–300 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Andres, S. N., Modesti, M., Tsai, C. J., Chu, G. & Junop, M. S. Crystal structure of human XLF: a twist in nonhomologous DNA end-joining. Mol. Cell 28, 1093–1101 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Ahnesorg, P., Smith, P. & Jackson, S. P. XLF interacts with the XRCC4-DNA ligase IV complex to promote DNA nonhomologous end-joining. Cell 124, 301–313 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Buck, D. et al. Cernunnos, a novel nonhomologous end-joining factor, is mutated in human immunodeficiency with microcephaly. Cell 124, 287–299 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Ropars, V. et al. Structural characterization of filaments formed by human Xrcc4-Cernunnos/XLF complex involved in nonhomologous DNA end-joining. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 12663–12668 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Roy, S. et al. XRCC4/XLF interaction is variably required for DNA repair and is not required for ligase IV stimulation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 35, 3017–3028 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Farley, F. W., Soriano, P., Steffen, L. S. & Dymecki, S. M. Widespread recombinase expression using FLPeR (flipper) mice. Genesis 28, 106–110 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Borghesani, P. R. et al. Abnormal development of Purkinje cells and lymphocytes in Atm mutant mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 3336–3341 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Difilippantonio, S. et al. 53BP1 facilitates long-range DNA end-joining during V(D)J recombination. Nature 456, 529–533 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Oksenych, V. et al. Functional redundancy between the XLF and DNA-PKcs DNA repair factors in V(D)J recombination and nonhomologous DNA end joining. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 2234–2239 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Orii, K. E., Lee, Y., Kondo, N. & McKinnon, P. J. Selective utilization of nonhomologous end-joining and homologous recombination DNA repair pathways during nervous system development. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 10017–10022 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Li, G. et al. Lymphocyte-specific compensation for XLF/Cernunnos end-joining functions in V(D)J recombination. Mol. Cell 31, 631–640 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Franco, S. et al. H2AX prevents DNA breaks from progressing to chromosome breaks and translocations. Mol. Cell 21, 201–214 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Kumar, V., Alt, F. W. & Frock, R. L. PAXX and XLF DNA repair factors are functionally redundant in joining DNA breaks in a G1-arrested progenitor B-cell line. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 10619–10624 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Lescale, C. et al. Specific roles of XRCC4 paralogs PAXX and XLF during V(D)J recombination. Cell Rep. 16, 2967–2979 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Sibanda, B. L. et al. Crystal structure of an Xrcc4-DNA ligase IV complex. Nat. Struct. Biol. 8, 1015–1019 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Bryans, M., Valenzano, M. C. & Stamato, T. D. Absence of DNA ligase IV protein in XR-1 cells: evidence for stabilization by XRCC4. Mutat. Res. 433, 53–58 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Riballo, E. et al. XLF-Cernunnos promotes DNA ligase IVXRCC4 re-adenylation following ligation. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, 482–492 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Karanjawala, Z. E. et al. The embryonic lethality in DNA ligase IV-deficient mice is rescued by deletion of Ku: implications for unifying the heterogeneous phenotypes of NHEJ mutants. DNA Repair 1, 1017–1026 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Deriano, L. et al. The RAG2 C terminus suppresses genomic instability and lymphomagenesis. Nature 471, 119–123 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Douglas, P. et al. Polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1) and protein phosphatase 6 (PP6) regulate DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNA-PKcs) phosphorylation in mitosis. Biosci. Rep. 34, e00113 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    Graham, T. G., Walter, J. C. & Loparo, J. J. Two-stage synapsis of DNA ends during non-homologous end joining. Mol. Cell 61, 850–858 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41

    Avagyan, S. et al. Hematopoietic stem cell dysfunction underlies the progressive lymphocytopenia in XLF/Cernunnos deficiency. Blood 124, 1622–1625 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42

    Zha, S., Alt, F. W., Cheng, H. L., Brush, J. W. & Li, G. Defective DNA repair and increased genomic instability in Cernunnos-XLF-deficient murine ES cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 4518–4523 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43

    Ward, I. M., Minn, K., van, D. J. & Chen, J. p53 binding protein 53BP1 is required for DNA damage responses and tumor suppression in mice. Mol. Cell Biol. 23, 2556–2563 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr Richard Baer for his comments and critical review of the manuscript. We thank Dr Andre Nussenzweig for providing the Ku80-deficient mice, from which we derived Ku80-deficient MEFs. We also thank Drs. Xiaochun Yu, Li Lan and David J. Chen for providing plasmids encoding tagged NHEJ factors used for live cell imaging. We also wish to thank Chen Li and Dr Chyuan-Sheng Lin for exceptional technical assistances in creating genetically modified mouse models. We apologize to colleagues, whose work could not be cited due to space limitations and was covered by reviews instead. This work is in part supported by NIH 5R01CA158073, 5R01CA184187, 1P01CA174653 and American Cancer Society Research Scholar Grant (RSG-13-038-01 DMC) to S.Z. S.Z. is the recipient of the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society Scholar Award. X.L. is a recipient of the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society Career Development Program Fellowship Award. W.J. was supported by NIH/NCI T32 training grant on Cancer Biology (NIH/NCI 5T32CA09503).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

X.L., Z.S., W.J. and B.J.L. conducted the experiments. X.L., Z.S. and S.Z. designed the experiments and analysed the data. X.L., Z.S. and S.Z. wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shan Zha.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures 1-6 and Supplementary Tables 1-2 (PDF 1818 kb)

Peer Review File (PDF 367 kb)

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, X., Shao, Z., Jiang, W. et al. PAXX promotes KU accumulation at DNA breaks and is essential for end-joining in XLF-deficient mice. Nat Commun 8, 13816 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13816

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links