Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Identification of carbon-encapsulated iron nanoparticles as active species in non-precious metal oxygen reduction catalysts

Abstract

The widespread use of fuel cells is currently limited by the lack of efficient and cost-effective catalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction. Iron-based non-precious metal catalysts exhibit promising activity and stability, as an alternative to state-of-the-art platinum catalysts. However, the identity of the active species in non-precious metal catalysts remains elusive, impeding the development of new catalysts. Here we demonstrate the reversible deactivation and reactivation of an iron-based non-precious metal oxygen reduction catalyst achieved using high-temperature gas-phase chlorine and hydrogen treatments. In addition, we observe a decrease in catalyst heterogeneity following treatment with chlorine and hydrogen, using Mössbauer and X-ray absorption spectroscopy. Our study reveals that protected sites adjacent to iron nanoparticles are responsible for the observed activity and stability of the catalyst. These findings may allow for the design and synthesis of enhanced non-precious metal oxygen reduction catalysts with a higher density of active sites.

Introduction

Fuel cells (FCs) offer a highly efficient method to convert chemical energy into electrical energy. Despite their advantages, fuel cells currently require the use of Pt-alloy catalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR), which makes such devices cost-prohibitive for many applications1,2. For this reason, non-precious metal (NPM) ORR catalysts have been intensely investigated, following the discovery of the ORR activity of Co phthalocyanines as early as 1964 (ref. 3). Pyrolysis of Fe- or Co-containing porphyrins and phthalocyanines affords catalysts of enhanced stability and activity4,5,6. Many other N-containing materials, when pyrolyzed in the presence of Fe salts, also exhibit promising activity7,8,9,10,11,12. Specifically, N-rich polymers such as polyaniline, lead to catalysts with ORR activity approaching that of Pt in acid13,14,15,16. However, progress towards making enhanced ORR materials is inhibited due to the lack of understanding regarding the ORR-active site.

Elucidating the nature of the catalytic centre in NPM ORR catalysts is challenging due to the heterogeneity introduced during the high-temperature synthesis that is also retained during ORR operation. Studies utilizing metal-binding ligands such as CN suggest that the activity in these catalysts is metal-centred17,18,19. Two models for the active site are suggested. The first model consists of a metal particle encapsulated by a carbon shell20,21. However, this model does not accommodate the requirement for nitrogen5,7,22. A second model invokes a porphyrin-like FeN4 (or FeN2+2) structure23,24,25,26. Studies of ORR-active materials show the presence of both metallic Fe and Fe–N species16,24,27,28. ORR catalysts containing a preponderance of either type of site have been recently synthesized, with catalysts suggested to feature FeN4 species exhibiting the highest activity to date26,29,30,31. However, the active species in the vast majority of reported NPM catalysts remains unknown due to the heterogeneity present.

Efforts to permanently deactivate a NPM ORR catalyst to locate the source of ORR activity have been unsuccessful. Treating the catalyst with strong acid does not remove all of the Fe metal and in fact leads to a more active catalyst8,23,27,32,33,34. The residual metal is assumed to be inactive for ORR, but the results are not definitive. Selective poisoning that could identify specific centres responsible for ORR activity is also problematic. NPM ORR catalysts exhibit a high tolerance to most anions, such as F, SCN, N3 and phosphate13,17,18. Both pyrolyzed and unpyrolyzed NPM ORR catalysts are insensitive to CO and while the inhibitory effect of CN has been demonstrated, it can be removed by simply placing the CN-exposed catalyst in fresh electrolyte without CN (refs 18, 35, 36). In contrast, the poisoning of the biological Fe heme-based ORR catalyst cytochrome c oxidase with CO has been observed36,37. The inconsistency in these results leaves room for further clarification into the active species found in the many pyrolyzed and unpyrolyzed ORR catalysts described in literature, including the role of the FeN4 site in pyrolyzed NPM catalysts due to the lack of poisoning that has been observed in some cases37,38. Interestingly, high-temperature treatments with H2S, H2 and NH3 have all increased NPM catalyst activity10,25,26,32,39. It has been noted that at high temperatures, NH3 would likely be decomposed to N2 and H2 (ref. 25). These conditions are reducing, but the chemical basis for this enhancement remains unclear32. We hypothesized that a high-temperature treatment in an oxidizing atmosphere such as Cl2 might be able to deactivate an NPM catalyst. Such treatments are used to oxidize and remove metallic impurities from carbon materials via the formation and sublimation of volatile metal chlorides40,41,42,43.

In this paper, we report the effects of high-temperature Cl2 and H2 treatments on a NPM ORR catalyst and show that a reproducible deactivation and reactivation of the catalyst are achieved via the respective treatments. In addition, we show that the heterogeneity of the catalyst is decreased by treatment with Cl2 and H2, which allows for the direct characterization of the species present in the deactivated and reactivated catalysts. Mössbauer spectroscopy, X-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES), extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) reveal the changes induced by the Cl2 and H2 treatments and clarify the nature of the ORR-active species.

Results

Effect of Cl2 and H2 treatments on ORR activity

For our work, we used a polyaniline-derived catalyst due to its reported high activity and stability, which we denote as the ‘as-prepared’ catalyst14. We subjected the as-prepared catalyst material to a high-temperature treatment with Cl2 at 900 °C. The ‘Cl2-treated’ catalyst was subsequently treated with H2 at 900 °C leading to the ‘H2-treated’ catalyst.

Figure 1 shows cyclic voltammetry (CV) on a rotating disk electrode (RDE) to evaluate the ORR activity of the three catalysts studied. The Cl2 treatment resulted in a negative shift of the ORR onset by ca. 170 mV. In addition, an increase in peroxide formation from 1.6 to 5.0% was observed after the Cl2 treatment using a rotating ring-disk electrode (RRDE) (Supplementary Fig. 1; Supplementary Table 1). These results indicate that the active site is poisoned or destroyed by the Cl2 treatment. After the H2 treatment, the ORR activity of the as-prepared catalyst was completely recovered, showing a similar onset potential and low peroxide yield. Repeated treatments with Cl2 and H2 on a single batch of as-prepared catalyst revealed that the observed effects are highly controllable (Supplementary Fig. 2).

Figure 1: Electrochemical characterization of catalysts.
figure1

Cyclic voltammograms of ORR on as-prepared, Cl2-treated and H2-treated catalysts in 0.1 M HClO4.

To explain the observed deactivation and reactivation of the NPM material, we used inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) to measure the Fe content in the as-prepared, Cl2-treated and H2-treated materials (Supplementary Table 2). Although the Fe content was decreased by the Cl2 treatment, some Fe remained and was never completely removed, similar to previous attempts to demetalate the catalyst8,28. This result suggests that the form of the Fe present affects the observed ORR activity and not the total Fe content. The oxidizing nature of the Cl2 treatment favours the formation of oxidized Fe species, while the reducing nature of the H2 treatment causes the formation of reduced Fe species. In addition, the presence of Cl in the Cl2-treated catalyst was observed using elemental analysis (Supplementary Table 2). Survey XPS spectra are shown in Fig. 2 that also indicate the presence of Cl in the Cl2-treated sample. Supplementary Fig. 3 shows the high-resolution scans taken in the C 1 s region, which show no change in the surface carbon species present before and after the Cl2 and H2 treatments.

Figure 2: X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy.
figure2

Spectra of as-prepared, Cl2-treated and H2-treated catalysts showing the surface species present on each catalyst studied.

To investigate the effects of the treatment temperature, we treated the as-prepared catalyst with Cl2 at 600 °C and observed that no deactivation occurred (Supplementary Fig. 4), consistent with a prior report that found slight ORR activity enhancement following treatment with Cl2 at 650 °C (ref. 8). Supplementary Fig. 5 shows the XPS survey spectrum of the catalyst following 600 °C Cl2 treatment that indicates the presence of Cl similar to the 900 °C Cl2-treated catalyst. This suggests that the presence of Cl is not responsible for the large deactivation that was observed following Cl2 treatment at 900 °C on the as-prepared catalyst.

To determine if the deactivation observed following the Cl2 treatment at 900 °C was related to the presence of Fe, we synthesized the catalyst without Fe and carried out the same gas treatments at 900 °C. Supplementary Fig. 6 shows the electrochemical activity of the metal-free catalyst before and after the treatment with Cl2 and H2. The overall activity of the metal-free catalyst is significantly lower than that of the catalyst containing Fe, and only a small deactivation and reactivation of the metal-free catalyst was observed. Supplementary Figs 7 and 8 show the XPS survey spectra and C 1 s region for the metal-free catalyst that displays the same presence of Cl after Cl2 treatment and the removal of Cl with the H2 treatment that were observed for the Fe-based catalyst. Because of the small effect observed after Cl2 treatment and the low initial activity of the metal-free catalyst, the presence of the metal in the Fe-containing catalyst must contribute to the higher activity and large deactivation that were observed. To discover the nature of the Fe species in the as-prepared and treated catalysts, we utilized several additional methods to further examine each catalyst and determine the species responsible for the appreciable ORR activity observed.

Mössbauer spectroscopy

We evaluated the as-prepared and treated catalysts using Mössbauer spectroscopy (Fig. 3). Assignments for each of the signals observed for the three spectra are given in Supplementary Table 3 based on the previous literature. The Mössbauer spectrum of the as-prepared catalyst (Fig. 3a) shows FeN4 species along with Fe3C and α-Fe in the form of both magnetically split and superparamagnetic species, consistent with the previous literature16. The presence of both oxidized and reduced Fe species in the as-prepared catalysts inhibits identification of the active Fe species. The spectrum of the Cl2-treated catalyst (Fig. 3b) shows a small amount of FexN and superparamagnetic α-Fe, with a significantly smaller absorption area than for the as-prepared and H2-treated catalyst. The spectrum of the H2-treated catalyst (Fig. 3c) shows only reduced Fe species, including the magnetically split signal of α-Fe and a singlet from superparamagnetic α-Fe with additional contributions from Fe3C. Noticeably, absent in the H2-treated catalyst is the signature of any Fe–N species, including FeN4 and FexN.

Figure 3: Mössbauer spectroscopy characterization of catalysts.
figure3

Spectra and peak fitting of as-prepared (a), Cl2-treated (b) and H2-treated (c) catalysts at 300 K. Both magnetically split (mag) and superparamagnetic (spm) metallic Fe species are observed.

The small absorption area observed for the Cl2-treated catalyst is not caused by the removal of Fe from the catalyst, because after H2 treatment (without the addition of Fe), the absorption area is relatively large. This indicates that the Fe species present after the Cl2 treatment are not tightly bound to the carbon matrix and are not in the form of large crystallites. Such species would be undetectable by Mössbauer spectroscopy, since the recoil-free absorption requires the Fe atoms to be fixed in a solid lattice44.

In addition, we performed Mössbauer spectroscopy on the catalyst treated with Cl2 at 600 °C, and a catalyst that was first treated with Cl2 at 900 °C and then with H2 at 600 °C. Both of these treated catalysts exhibited similar activity of the as-prepared catalyst as shown in Supplementary Figs 4 and 9 and their Mössbauer spectra reveal the presence of reduced Fe species (Supplementary Figs 10 and 11; Supplementary Table 4). These results indicate that Cl2 treatment at 600 °C does not remove all of the reduced Fe present and therefore does not alter the activity of the catalyst. Similarly, the recovered activity of the samples treated with H2 at 600 °C and the presence of regenerated reduced Fe show that these species can be correlated to the changes in activity that we have observed. Since the Cl2 treatment at 600 °C also introduces Cl into the surface of the catalyst as demonstrated by XPS in Supplementary Fig. 5, the lack of a deactivation at 600 °C indicates that the presence of Cl on the surface of the catalyst does not cause the deactivation observed with Cl2 treatment at 900 °C. Cl is removed by the H2 treatment at 600 °C as shown in Supplementary Fig. 12, but because surface Cl does not effect the catalyst activity the simultaneous reduction of Fe species must be responsible for the reactivation.

The magnetic nature of the samples was further investigated using vibrating sample magnetometry (VSM; Supplementary Fig. 13). Superparamagnetic Fe species are present in the as-prepared and H2-treated catalysts, as indicated by the sigmoidal curve and lack of a ferromagnetic hysteresis. In the Cl2-treated catalyst, the superparamagnetic signal is diluted by the presence of paramagnetic Fe species. Supplementary Fig. 14 displays the electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectra that indicate the presence of paramagnetic species in the as-prepared and Cl2-treated catalysts, but not in the H2-treated catalyst. In all EPR spectra superparamagnetic Fe species contribute a broad background signal.

X-ray absorption spectroscopy

Fe K-edge EXAFS and XANES spectra were used to determine the local bonding environment of the Fe in each sample. Figure 4a shows the normalized XANES spectra for the catalysts studied and standards with insets displaying the structural models of the standards that are used. The spectra of the as-prepared and the H2-treated catalysts both show strong metallic character, resembling the spectrum of metal Fe foil. The spectrum of the Cl2-treated catalyst shows Fe in a higher oxidation state with a structure very similar to hydrated FeCl3 (FeCl3·xH2O)45. Figure 4b,c shows the corresponding Fe K-edge EXAFS data in k-space and after their Fourier transform to R-space. It is evident that in the Cl2-treated catalyst the interatomic distances are shorter, compared with the as-prepared and H2-treated catalysts, and the nearest neighbours of Fe in the Cl2-treated catalyst are relatively light elements, similar to those in FeCl3·xH2O. These conclusions follow from the lower R-space peak distances (Fig. 4c), and the fact that EXAFS oscillations are peaked at lower values of wavenumber k (Fig. 4b), respectively. In the H2-treated catalyst EXAFS spectra show strong similarity to Fe foil that hints on the bcc structure of the former. Lower amplitudes of EXAFS oscillations for the H2-treated catalyst with respect to those of metallic foil reveal reduced coordination numbers and/or enhanced structural disorder. One can thus expect that metallic Fe is in a disordered and nanostructured form in H2-treated catalyst.

Figure 4: X-ray absorption spectra for as-prepared, Cl2-treated and H2-treated catalysts.
figure4

XANES (a), EXAFS (b) and Fourier transforms (FTs) of EXAFS (c). Dashed lines show spectra for reference materials: Fe foil (bcc structure) and hydrated Fe (III) chloride (FeCl3·xH2O). Structures of reference materials are shown in the insets of a.

Quantitative analysis of EXAFS data in the Cl2- and H2-treated catalysts was performed by non-linear least square fitting of theoretical EXAFS spectra to the data in R-space, using FEFFIT program46. Theoretical photoelectron scattering amplitudes and phases were calculated using ab initio FEFF8.5 code46,47. First coordination shell fitting was performed for the Cl2-treated catalyst, while advanced multiple-shell analysis was used for the H2-treated catalyst (see details in Supplementary Note 1). Data and best fits are displayed in Fig. 5. A summary of the best fit values of structural parameters are given in Table 1. For the Cl2-treated sample, the coordination numbers of Fe with O and Cl were found to be 2±1 and 4±1, respectively, and the Fe–Cl distance was obtained to match that of FeCl3˙xH2O. These values indicate the presence of hydrated FeCl3 and lack of metallic Fe in the sample following the Cl2 treatment.

Figure 5: FEFFIT analysis for Cl2-treated and H2-treated catalyst material.
figure5

Fourier transforms of experimental EXAFS spectra and best fit results.

Table 1 Best fit structural parameters obtained from the analysis of EXAFS data.

For the H2-treated catalyst, we find that bcc model provides a good fit, in support of our preliminary conclusions from examination of the raw data. The coordination numbers for the first two nearest neighbour Fe–Fe shells for the H2-treated catalyst were obtained to be 5.7±0.8 and 3±2, respectively, that is, significantly smaller than the corresponding values for bulk bcc Fe (8 and 6, respectively). This indicates that the Fe is present in the nanoparticle form48. From the best fit values of the coordination numbers of the first few shells, the nanoparticle size can be estimated, assuming particular structure and shape48. Assuming the bcc-type structure and cubic shape, the particle size in the H2-treated sample is calculated to be 1.0–1.5 nm (see Supplementary Fig. 15 for details). This finding is consistent with other recent reports on Fe-based electrocatalysts33,49. The values of the mean-square relative displacement for Fe–Fe pairs were slightly larger for the H2-treated catalyst compared with Fe foil, indicating the presence of larger structural disorder, which is expected in small particles.

To further evaluate the size and disorder of the Fe nanoparticles in the as-prepared and H2-treated catalysts, we used transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and scanning TEM (STEM). Supplementary Figs 16 and 17 show TEM and STEM images of all catalysts studied, respectively. Fe nanoparticles ranging from 10 to 30 nm are observed in the as-prepared and H2-treated samples, while in the Cl2-treated sample no nanoparticles are seen, but evidence of the graphitic carbon shells previously formed around Fe nanoparticles is visible. In addition, we carried out fitting of the VSM data for the as-prepared and H2-treated samples using the Langevin function for superparamagnetic particles giving a third measurement of particle size (Supplementary Fig. 18; Supplementary Note 2)33. For the as-prepared catalyst, the average particle size from fitting was 3.22 nm, while the average particle size for the H2-treated catalyst was 3.80 nm. Powder X-ray diffraction indicated the presence of reduced Fe species in the as-prepared and H2-treated catalysts; however, the signal from the carbon support prevented further analysis of the X-ray diffraction data (Supplementary Fig. 19).

The discrepancy in the size of the Fe particles for the as-prepared and H2-treated catalysts as measured using TEM/STEM, EXAFS and VSM can be explained by the size ranges that each technique is able to sample and indicates a high degree of heterogeneity and, possibly, disorder among the reduced Fe species that are observed. Similar results have been obtained in a recent study using EXAFS and (S)TEM on a material with heterogeneous particle sizes, which showed that these techniques complement and do not contradict each other50. In addition, disagreement between TEM and VSM has been reported previously for two types of NPM ORR catalysts, possibly due to granularity in the particles observed by TEM and by the presence of disordered Fe phases within the observed particles which are non-magnetic33.

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy

To determine the role of N in the Fe-containing and metal-free catalysts used in our study, we carried out high-resolution XPS in the N 1 s region. In recent work on NPM and metal-free catalysts, the direct involvement of N species during ORR, especially pyridinic N and Fe–N, has been implicated27,51,52. The resulting spectra for the Fe-containing catalyst are shown in Fig. 6 and the spectra for the metal-free catalyst are shown in Supplementary Fig. 20. For both the Fe-containing and metal-free catalysts oxydic, graphitic, pyrrolic and/or pyridinic N species were observed as assigned from the previous literature and given in Supplementary Table 5 (refs 24, 27). Following Cl2 treatment and H2 treatment, the bands associated with pyridinic species decreased slightly, but no major changes in N speciation occurred. The fact that there were no major changes in N speciation following the Cl2 and H2 treatments suggests that the type of N species that is present does not explain any of the changes in ORR activity that we have observed. Therefore, it is likely that the active site in these catalysts does not involve N or Fe–N moieties. Graphitic N is the dominant species in all of the catalysts that we studied, which indicates that N is doped into the graphitic carbon that surrounds and protects the Fe nanoparticles. The presence of graphitic N in active NPM ORR catalysts is also observed in other work16,27,33.

Figure 6: N 1 s XPS characterization of catalysts.
figure6

Spectra and peak fitting of as-prepared (a), Cl2-treated (b) and H2-treated (c) catalysts showing the presence of oxydic (red), graphitic (blue), pyrrolic (green) and pyridinic (pink) N species.

Discussion

Mössbauer and X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) show that in the as-prepared catalyst a combination of FeN4 and reduced Fe species is present, in agreement with previous reports, which makes the direct characterization of the active species difficult16,28,34. Through the use of a Cl2 treatment, we show that the metallic Fe and FeN4 species are converted into dispersed FeCl3·xH2O that is reformed into reduced Fe species by the H2 treatment as shown in Fig. 7. The absence of FeN4 sites in the H2-treated catalyst indicates that these sites are not required for the observed ORR activity. To confirm that metal centred sites are not involved in the ORR, we carried out the selective poisoning experiments using KCN similar to previous work by our group18. Supplementary Fig. 21 shows cyclic voltammograms in the absence and presence of CN, which confirm that the behaviour of the as-prepared, Cl2-treated and H2-treated catalysts is very different from that of unpyrolyzed Fe phthalocyanine. The lack of a significant poisoning effect supports our observation that FeN4 species are not the active species in the catalysts we studied. XPS in the N 1 s region shows oxydic, graphitic, pyrrolic and/or pyridinic N in all of the catalysts studied, with only minor changes in the relative amounts of each species, further indicating that N speciation does not play a major role in determining the ORR activity before and after the Cl2 and H2 treatments. From these results, we conclude that a reduced Fe phase, in the form of small superparamagnetic nanoparticles that are encapsulated by thin layers of N-doped carbon, can be linked to the ORR activity of the H2-treated catalyst. We note that although we show FeN4 are not required for ORR activity, FeN4 centres may be active in other systems26,31.

Figure 7: Effect of Cl2 and H2 treatments on Fe species and ORR activity.
figure7

Fe species identified in each catalyst demonstrating the selective removal of FeN4 sites and formation of encapsulated Fe nanoparticles in the H2-treated catalyst.

If FeN4 species are not the locus of ORR activity in the H2-treated material, the question remains as to the role of N in ORR catalyst preparation. To address this question, we omitted aniline during synthesis to make a N-free version of the as-prepared catalyst. The resultant N-free material displayed minimal ORR activity compared with the as-prepared catalyst made with aniline as shown in Supplementary Fig. 22. Interestingly, the N-free catalyst is ferromagnetic indicating the presence of larger Fe particles that are capable of forming magnetic domains as shown in Supplementary Fig. 23. Powder X-ray diffraction on the N-free catalyst shows that all of the Fe present is in the form of Fe-oxides (magnetite and haematite), which are inactive towards the ORR (Supplementary Fig. 24). Elemental analysis of the N-free catalyst shows that the material contains virtually no C or N, suggesting that the presence of the polymeric N species is required to prevent the complete removal of C during pyrolysis (Supplementary Table 6). The association of Fe with N and N with C in the catalyst during pyrolysis must play an important role in promoting the formation of the carbon-encapsulated Fe nanoparticles that are observed. The initial coordination of Fe to N should help to form the small superparamagnetic Fe particles within the carbon support. One possible explanation for this observation is that the N species function as nucleation sites for the formation of small superparamagnetic Fe particles. Another explanation is that the use of polymeric N-containing precursors helps to template and form small Fe particles during synthesis. In this way, the recent results reported utilizing extremely low Fe loading to achieve highly active Fe-based NPM catalysts could be explained by the formation of extremely small Fe nanoparticles or Fe clusters, which are contained within the carbon support and function as the active species26,31.

There are also other possible explanations for the role of N not excluded by this work. The formation of basic N sites, which tune the surface functionality, could increase the activity of the catalyst52. In addition, density functional theory (DFT) calculations suggest that N incorporation decreases the work function at the surface of the carbon-encapsulated nanoparticles helping to facilitate ORR29. It is possible that the incorporation of N may contribute to the enhanced ORR activity of NPM catalysts through one or more different effects. More work is needed to identify the specific roles of N in both the formation of catalytic sites during synthesis and possible participation of N species in the active sites during ORR.

We further characterized the catalysts before and after ORR operation to show that no new Fe or Fe–N species were formed in situ and that the Fe nanoparticles remain present in the material using CV, VSM and XPS (Supplementary Note 3; Supplementary Figs 25–28). These results confirm that the characterizations performed on the catalyst materials before their operation in acidic conditions for ORR remain valid while in use. Our experimental results and characterization of the catalyst materials show that reduced Fe particles encapsulated by N-doped carbon are the locus of ORR activity in the H2-treated catalyst. These Fe particles are disordered and nanostructured, which enhances their catalytic properties due to the increased surface to bulk ratio, and are made stable in acid by their encapsulation.

In situ XAS studies of other NPM ORR catalysts show the stability of the protected Fe particles from oxidation, as well as the absence of the formation of FeN4 structures29,30. EXAFS reports that Fe particles encapsulated by carbon stored in ambient conditions for over 2 years are not oxidized53. The lack of FeN4 sites and the encapsulation of Fe particles could possibly help to explain the puzzling observation that CO does not poison pyrolyzed NPM ORR catalysts35. The absence of strong sensitivity to small molecule poisons can be explained by the electronic interaction of the active species with molecular O2. In this case, the donation of electron density from the Fe particle to the carbon shell allows for efficient ORR catalysis. This model for shell-encapsulated Fe nanoparticles has been implicated in the hydrogen evolution reaction, where DFT suggests that electron density is donated from the Fe particle to individual atoms in the graphitic shell49,54. DFT calculations have also been used to explain the catalytic activity of encapsulated Fe particles for the ORR that are present in many NPM ORR catalysts29. Furthermore, recent work has shown the important role of N doping in enhancing the catalytic activity of carbon-encapsulated Fe nanoparticles30.

In summary, we utilized a purification process with Cl2 and H2 treatments to produce active ORR catalysts with catalytic centres of improved definition. Two clear conclusions can be drawn: (i) FeN4 sites are not required to generate an active ORR catalyst and (ii) reduced Fe species protected by carbon are active catalytic species for the ORR. We showed that Fe particles encapsulated by graphitic C and N, which are present in the H2-treated catalyst, exhibit the same ORR activity as the as-prepared catalyst leading us to identify them as the active species. Our findings reveal that synthetic methods favouring the formation of a large number of small Fe particles encapsulated by N-doped carbon may lead to the discovery of improved NPM ORR catalysts.

Methods

Preparation of Catalyst Material

Synthesis of the Fe-based NPM ORR catalyst was carried out following the procedure described in the previous literature13,14,15. Carbon black (Ketjenblack EC 300 J) was treated in 0.1 M HCl for 24 h and then in 70% HNO3 at 80 °C for 8 h before being filtered and dried in an oven at 80 °C overnight. In a large round bottom flask, 2.5 ml of aniline was dispersed in 500 ml of 2.0 M HCl. The mixture was cooled in an ice bath until it was <10 °C, at which point 10 g of FeCl3 and 5 g of ammonium peroxydisulfate were added. After stirring for 3 h, 0.4 g of the treated carbon support was added and mixed for 48 h. The suspension was evaporated at 80 °C until dry and the resulting solid material was ground using a mortar and pestle into a fine powder. The powder was placed in a tube furnace and pyrolyzed under flowing N2 at 900 °C for 1 h. The sample was then ground a second time and leached in 500 ml of 0.5 M H2SO4 at 80 °C for 8 h followed by a second pyrolysis under flowing N2 at 900 °C for 3 h. The resulting material was labelled as ‘as-prepared’ catalyst.

Cl2 and H2 treatments

Warning: Cl2 is highly corrosive and toxic. H2 is flammable and explosion may occur. For the Cl2 treatment the ‘as-prepared’ catalyst material was placed in a tube furnace and heated under an inert Ar atmosphere to 900 °C, at which point Cl2 (Matheson, 99.999%) was flowed over the catalyst for 30 min. The treated sample was then allowed to cool to room temperature under Ar and labelled as ‘Cl2 treated’. For the H2 treatment, the Cl2-treated catalyst was heated to 900 °C under Ar, at which point a 50:50 mixture of Ar and H2 was flowed over the catalyst for 30 min before cooling to room temperature under Ar. The resulting material was labelled as ‘H2 treated’. The same treatment under pure Ar resulted in only partial recovery of catalyst activity (Supplementary Fig. 29) and significant removal of Cl (Supplementary Table 7). To study temperature effects, the same procedure was carried out using Cl2 at 600 °C on the as-prepared catalyst and a H2 treatment at 600 °C was carried out on the Cl2-treated (900 °C) catalyst. We note that treatment at >900 °C resulted in activity loss, even under Ar (Supplementary Fig. 30), hence treatments at >900 °C were not used.

Electrochemical activity measurements

The ORR activity of the prepared samples was measured using a RDE and a RRDE in a three-compartment electrochemical cell. Aqueous electrolyte solutions were prepared using Milli-Q purified water (>18 MΩ cm) and HClO4 (70 wt%, Fisher). Solutions were sparged with either Ar or O2 for 30 min before each experiment. Catalyst inks were prepared by dispersing 5 mg of catalyst powder in 175 μl of EtOH and 47.5 μl of 5% Nafion solution (Sigma Aldrich) using sonication. In all tests, 5 μl of the catalyst ink was drop-cast onto a glassy carbon electrode (A=0.196 cm2) and allowed to dry under a stream of N2. The glassy carbon disk was polished sequentially with 0.25 and 0.05 μm diamond polish (Buehler) and sonicated in water before use. For RRDE experiments, the Pt ring was electrochemically polished before each experiment by cycling the electrode in dilute HNO3 solution. The ring potential was held at 1.23 V versus RHE during RRDE experiments to efficiently oxidize peroxide to oxygen. RDE and RRDE electrodes were attached to an MSRX rotator (Pine Instruments) and rotated at 1,600 r.p.m. during all experiments. Cyclic voltammetry was carried out using a CH Instruments 760 D Electrochemical Workstation (Austin, TX) at room temperature with a ‘no-leak’ Ag/AgCl (3 M KCl) reference electrode (EDAQ) separated from the working electrode by a Luggin capillary. A carbon rod counter electrode was separated from the working electrode by a glass frit. All potentials were converted to RHE by measuring the open-circuit potential of a Pt wire working electrode in H2-saturated electrolyte immediately following catalyst testing.

Physical characterization

Mössbauer measurements were performed on a constant acceleration spectrometer (Knox College) at 300 K. X-ray absorption spectroscopy was carried out at sector 9 beamline sector (BM) at the Advanced Photon Source at Argonne National Lab with a beam cross section of 2.6 × 0.75 mm. Samples were studied ex situ by pressing the catalyst powder into a pellet. All measurements were recorded in transmission mode using a double-crystal Si (111) monochromator run at 50% detuning and ion chamber detectors filled with a mixture of He/N2. XPS was performed using a Kratos AXIS Ultra spectrometer with a monochromatic Al Kα (1486.6 eV) X-ray source. All binding energies were referenced to graphitic carbon at 284.5 eV. VSM was performed at 300 K using the Magnetic Property Measurement System (Quantum Design) with the sample placed in a plastic capsule and inserted into a brass rod. EPR spectra were recorded on a Varian E-line 12’ Century Series X-band CW spectrometer. Powder X-ray diffraction was performed using a Siemens/Bruker D5000 diffractometer with Cu K-α radiation (λ=0.15418, nm). ICP-OES was carried out on a PerkinElmer 2000DV ICP-OES. Sample powders were digested using 4 ml HNO3, 1 ml HCl and 1 ml HF in a commercial microwave digestion until the solution became clear and no solids remained present. TEM was performed on a JEOL 2010 TEM with a LaB6 filament at 200 kV and STEM was performed using a JEOL 2010 F STEM with a Schottky field emitter at 200 kV.

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Varnell, J. A. et al. Identification of carbon-encapsulated iron nanoparticles as active species in non-precious metal oxygen reduction catalysts. Nat. Commun. 7:12582 doi: 10.1038/ncomms12582 (2016).

References

  1. 1

    Stamenkovic, V. R. et al. Improved oxygen reduction activity on Pt3Ni(111) via increased surface site availability. Science 315, 493–497 (2007).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Gewirth, A. A. & Thorum, M. S. Electroreduction of dioxygen for fuel-cell applications: materials and challenges. Inorg. Chem. 49, 3557–3566 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Jasinski, R. A new fuel cell cathode catalyst. Nature 201, 1212–1213 (1964).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    van Veen, J. A. R., van Baar, J. F. & Kroese, K. J. Effect of heat treatment on the performance of carbon-supported transition-metal chelates in the electrochemical reduction of oxygen. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 77, 2827–2843 (1981).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Gojković, S. L., Gupta, S. & Savinell, R. F. Heat-treated iron(III) tetramethoxyphenyl porphyrin chloride supported on high-area carbon as an electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction: part ii. Kinetics of oxygen reduction. J. Electroanal. Chem. 462, 63–72 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Scherson, D. et al. Transition metal macrocycles supported on high area carbon: pyrolysis—mass spectrometry studies. Electrochim. Acta 31, 1247–1258 (1986).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Lalande, G. et al. Is nitrogen important in the formulation of Fe-based catalysts for oxygen reduction in solid polymer fuel cells? Electrochim. Acta 42, 1379–1388 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Faubert, G. et al. Activation and characterization of Fe-based catalysts for the reduction of oxygen in polymer electrolyte fuel cells. Electrochim. Acta 43, 1969–1984 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Gupta, S., Tryk, D., Bae, I., Aldred, W. & Yeager, E. Heat-treated polyacrylonitrile-based catalysts for oxygen electroreduction. J. Appl. Electrochem. 19, 19–27 (1989).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Meng, H. et al. Iron porphyrin-based cathode catalysts for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells: effect of NH3 and Ar mixtures as pyrolysis gases on catalytic activity and stability. Electrochim. Acta 55, 6450–6461 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Proietti, E. et al. Iron-based cathode catalyst with enhanced power density in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. Nat. Commun. 2, 416 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Médard, C., Lefèvre, M., Dodelet, J. P., Jaouen, F. & Lindbergh, G. Oxygen reduction by Fe-based catalysts in PEM fuel cell conditions: activity and selectivity of the catalysts obtained with two Fe precursors and various carbon supports. Electrochim. Acta 51, 3202–3213 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Li, Q. et al. Phosphate-tolerant oxygen reduction catalysts. ACS Catal. 4, 3193–3200 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Wu, G., Chen, Z., Artyushkova, K., Garzon, F. H. & Zelenay, P. Polyaniline-derived non-precious catalyst for the polymer electrolyte fuel cell cathode. ECS Trans. 16, 159–170 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Wu, G., More, K. L., Johnston, C. M. & Zelenay, P. High-performance electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction derived from polyaniline, iron, and cobalt. Science 332, 443–447 (2011).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Ferrandon, M. et al. Multitechnique characterization of a polyaniline–iron–carbon oxygen reduction catalyst. J. Phys. Chem. C 116, 16001–16013 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Oberst, J. L., Thorum, M. S. & Gewirth, A. A. Effect of pH and azide on the oxygen reduction reaction with a pyrolyzed Fe phthalocyanine catalyst. J. Phys. Chem. C 116, 25257–25261 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Thorum, M. S., Hankett, J. M. & Gewirth, A. A. Poisoning the oxygen reduction reaction on carbon-supported Fe and Cu electrocatalysts: evidence for metal-centered activity. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2, 295–298 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Tylus, U. et al. Elucidating oxygen reduction active sites in pyrolyzed metal–nitrogen coordinated non-precious-metal electrocatalyst systems. J. Phys. Chem. C 118, 8999–9008 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Faubert, G. et al. Heat-treated iron and cobalt tetraphenylporphyrins adsorbed on carbon black: physical characterization and catalytic properties of these materials for the reduction of oxygen in polymer electrolyte fuel cells. Electrochim. Acta 41, 1689–1701 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Lalande, G. et al. Catalytic activity and stability of heat-treated iron phthalocyanines for the electroreduction of oxygen in polymer electrolyte fuel cells. J. Power Sources 61, 227–237 (1996).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Faubert, G., Côté, R., Dodelet, J. P., Lefèvre, M. & Bertrand, P. Oxygen reduction catalysts for polymer electrolyte fuel cells from the pyrolysis of FeII acetate adsorbed on 3,4,9,10-perylenetetracarboxylic dianhydride. Electrochim. Acta 44, 2589–2603 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Kramm, U. I. et al. Structure of the catalytic sites in Fe/N/C-catalysts for O2-reduction in PEM fuel cells. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 14, 11673–11688 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Kramm, U. I. et al. New insight into the nature of catalytic activity of pyrolysed iron porphyrin based electro-catalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) in acidic media. ECS Trans 25, 93–104 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Jaouen, F., Lefèvre, M., Dodelet, J.-P. & Cai, M. Heat-treated Fe/N/C catalysts for O2 electroreduction: Are active sites hosted in micropores? J. Phys. Chem. B 110, 5553–5558 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Zitolo, A. et al. Identification of catalytic sites for oxygen reduction in iron- and nitrogen-doped graphene materials. Nat. Mater. 14, 937–942 (2015).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Kramm, U. I. et al. Influence of the electron-density of FeN4-centers towards the catalytic activity of pyrolyzed FeTMPPCl-based ORR-electrocatalysts. J. Electrochem. Soc. 158, B69–B78 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Matter, P. H., Wang, E., Millet, J.-M. M. & Ozkan, U. S. Characterization of the iron phase in CNx-based oxygen reduction reaction catalysts. J. Phys. Chem. C 111, 1444–1450 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Deng, D. et al. Iron encapsulated within pod-like carbon nanotubes for oxygen reduction reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 371–375 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Strickland, K. et al. Highly active oxygen reduction non-platinum group metal electrocatalyst without direct metal-nitrogen coordination. Nat. Commun. 6, 7343 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Kramm, U. I. et al. On an easy way to prepare metal–nitrogen doped carbon with exclusive presence of MeN4-type sites active for the ORR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 635–640 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    von Deak, D. et al. Investigation of sulfur poisoning of CNx oxygen reduction catalysts for PEM fuel cells. J. Catal. 285, 145–151 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Singh, D. et al. A comparison of N-containing carbon nanostructures (CNx) and N-coordinated iron–carbon catalysts (FeNC) for the oxygen reduction reaction in acidic media. J. Catal. 317, 30–43 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Koslowski, U. I., Abs-Wurmbach, I., Fiechter, S. & Bogdanoff, P. Nature of the catalytic centers of porphyrin-based electrocatalysts for the orr: a correlation of kinetic current density with the site density of Fe−N4 centers. J. Phys. Chem. C 112, 15356–15366 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Birry, L., Zagal, J. H. & Dodelet, J.-P. Does CO poison Fe-based catalysts for ORR? Electrochem. Commun. 12, 628–631 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Gupta, S., Fierro, C & Yeager, E. The effects of cyanide on the electrochemical properties of transition metal macrocycles for oxygen reduction in alkaline solutions. J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial Electrochem. 306, 239–250 (1991).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Collman, J. P., Brauman, J. I., Halbert, T. R. & Suslick, K. S. Nature of O2 and CO binding to metalloporphyrins and heme proteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 73, 3333–3337 (1976).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Collman, J. P., Dey, A., Barile, C. J., Ghosh, S. & Decréau, R. A. Inhibition of electrocatalytic O2 reduction of functional CCO models by competitive, non-competitive, and mixed inhibitors. Inorg. Chem. 48, 10528–10534 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Kramm, U. I., Herrmann-Geppert, I., Bogdanoff, P. & Fiechter, S. Effect of an ammonia treatment on structure, composition, and oxygen reduction reaction activity of Fe–N–C catalysts. J. Phys. Chem. C 115, 23417–23427 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    Ambrosi, A. et al. Chemically reduced graphene contains inherent metallic impurities present in parent natural and synthetic graphite. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 12899–12904 (2012).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41

    Pumera, M. Carbon nanotubes contain residual metal catalyst nanoparticles even after washing with nitric acid at elevated temperature because these metal nanoparticles are sheathed by several graphene sheets. Langmuir 23, 6453–6458 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42

    Mercier, G. et al. Selective removal of metal impurities from single walled carbon nanotube samples. New J. Chem. 37, 790–795 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43

    Chng, E. L. K., Poh, H. L., Sofer, Z. & Pumera, M. Purification of carbon nanotubes by high temperature chlorine gas treatment. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15, 5615–5619 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44

    Drago, R. S. Physical Methods in Chemistry 660 (Saunders (1977).

  45. 45

    Lind, M. D. Crystal structure of ferric chloride hexahydrate. J. Chem. Phys. 47, 990–993 (1967).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46

    Newville, M. et al. Analysis of multiple-scattering XAFS data using theoretical standards. Physica B Cond. Matter 208–209, 154–156 (1995).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47

    Ankudinov, A. L., Ravel, B., Rehr, J. J. & Conradson, S. D. Real-space multiple-scattering calculation and interpretation of x-ray-absorption near-edge structure. Phys. Rev. B 58, 7565–7576 (1998).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48

    Frenkel, A. Solving the structure of nanoparticles by multiple-scattering EXAFS analysis. J. Synchrotron. Rad. 6, 293–295 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49

    Tavakkoli, M. et al. Single-shell carbon-encapsulated iron nanoparticles: synthesis and high electrocatalytic activity for hydrogen evolution reaction. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 54, 4535–4538 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50

    Li, Y. et al. Complex structural dynamics of nanocatalysts revealed in operando conditions by correlated imaging and spectroscopy probes. Nat. Commun. 6, 7583 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51

    Guo, D. et al. Active sites of nitrogen-doped carbon materials for oxygen reduction reaction clarified using model catalysts. Science 351, 361–365 (2016).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52

    Herranz, J. et al. Unveiling N-protonation and anion-binding effects on Fe/N/C catalysts for O2 reduction in proton-exchange-membrane fuel cells. J. Phys. Chem. C 115, 16087–16097 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53

    Kappen, P., Rider, A., Pigram, P. J. & Brack, N. Long-term stability of metallic iron inside carbon nanotubes. J. Phys. Chem. C 115, 21083–21087 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54

    Taubert, S. & Laasonen, K. The molecular and magnetic structure of carbon-enclosed and partially covered Fe55 particles. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16, 3648–3660 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

J.A.V. acknowledges a Buhrke Fellowship from the Chemistry Department at the University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign. E.C.M.T. acknowledges a Croucher Foundation Scholarship. We thank the US National Science Foundation (Grant CHE-1309731) for support of this research. A.I.F. and J.T. acknowledge support from the US National Science Foundation Grant CHE-1534184. This work was carried out in part in the Frederick Seitz Materials Research Laboratory Central Facilities, which are partially supported by the US Department of Energy (DE-FG02-07ER46453 and DE-FG02-07ER46471). T.T.F. was supported by the Joint Center for Energy Storage Research, an Energy Innovation Hub funded by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science. XAFS measurements at Materials Research Collaborative Access Team (MRCAT) were supported by the Department of Energy and the MRCAT member institutions. This research used resources of the Advanced Photon Source, a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science User Facility operated for the DOE Office of Science by Argonne National Laboratory under contract no. DE-AC02-06CH11357. We thank James Sotiropoulos and Therese Brown for help with catalyst preparation and RDE measurements, Angela DiAscro for help with chlorine treatments and Jing Liu for her help with XAS measurements at the beamline 5-BM-D.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J.A.V., E.C.M.T. and A.A.G. designed the experiments and analysed the data. J.A.V., E.C.M.T., C.E.S., T.T.F. and R.T.H. performed the experiments. A.I.F. and J.T. performed quantitative EXAFS analysis. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew A. Gewirth.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures 1-30, Supplementary Tables 1-7, Supplementary Notes 1-3 and Supplementary References. (PDF 3392 kb)

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Varnell, J., Tse, E., Schulz, C. et al. Identification of carbon-encapsulated iron nanoparticles as active species in non-precious metal oxygen reduction catalysts. Nat Commun 7, 12582 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12582

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing