Abstract
Mapping the strong interaction between Rydberg atoms onto single photons via electromagnetically induced transparency enables manipulation of light at the singlephoton level and fewphoton devices such as alloptical switches and transistors operated by individual photons. Here we demonstrate experimentally that Starktuned Förster resonances can substantially increase this effective interaction between individual photons. This technique boosts the gain of a singlephoton transistor to over 100, enhances the nondestructive detection of single Rydberg atoms to a fidelity beyond 0.8, and enables highprecision spectroscopy on Rydberg pair states. On top, we achieve a gain larger than 2 with gate photon readout after the transistor operation. Theory models for Rydberg polariton propagation on Förster resonance and for the projection of the stored spinwave yield excellent agreement to our data and successfully identify the main decoherence mechanism of the Rydberg transistor, paving the way towards photonic quantum gates.
Introduction
Rydberg excitations of ultracold atoms^{1} are currently attracting tremendous attention because of possible applications in quantum computing^{2,3,4,5} and simulation^{6,7,8,9,10}. One particular aspect is the realization of fewphoton nonlinearities mediated by Rydberg interaction^{11,12,13,14}, enabling novel schemes for highly efficient singlephoton generation^{15,16}, entanglement creation between light and atomic excitations^{17}, singlephoton alloptical switches^{18} and transistors^{19,20}, singlephoton absorbers^{21} and interactioninduced photon phase shifts^{22,23}. Interacting Rydberg polaritons also enable attractive forces between single photons^{24}, crystallization of photons^{25} and photonic scattering resonances^{26}. The above experiments and proposals make use of the longrange electric dipole–dipole interaction between Rydberg atoms^{27,28,29,30,31}. A highly useful tool for controlling the interaction are Starktuned Förster resonances, where two dipolecoupled pair states are shifted into resonance by a dc^{32} or microwave^{33,34} electric field. Förster resonances have been studied by observation of dipole blockade^{35}, line shape analysis^{36}, doubleresonance spectroscopy^{37}, excitation statistics^{38} and Ramsey spectroscopy^{39,40}. Recently, resonant fourbody interaction^{41} and the anisotropic blockade on Förster resonance^{42} and quasiforbidden Förster resonances^{43} have been observed, and Förster resonances between different atomic species have been predicted^{44}. For Rydbergmediated singlephoton transistors, the nearresonance in zero field for specific pair states has been used to enhance the transistor gain^{20}, while in experiments on Rydberg atom imaging^{45,46} an increase in Rydberg excitation hopping has been observed on resonance^{47}.
In this work, we use Starktuned Förster resonances to greatly increase the interaction between individual photons inside a Rydberg medium. We achieve this by tuning pair states S^{(g)},S^{(s)}〉 containing two different Rydberg Sstates into resonance with P^{(g)},P^{(s)}〉 pair states by an electric field. We show that for gate and source Rydberg states 50S_{1/2},48S_{1/2}〉, we can boost the performance of a Rydberg singlephoton transistor. When operated classically, we achieve , enabling highfidelity detection of single Rydberg atoms. This improved transistor can be operated such that the gate photon is read out with finite efficiency, reaching a gain . We develop theoretical models for the dynamics of Rydberg polaritons in the presence of Förster resonances and the loss of coherence due to photon scattering. Excellent agreement with our experimental data is found. Finally, our alloptical probe represents a novel approach for the highresolution study of the substructure of Förster resonances caused by fine structure and Stark/Zeeman splitting of the P^{(g)},P^{(s)}〉 pair states. We demonstrate this technique by resolving the multiresonance structure of the 66S_{1/2},64S_{1/2}〉 pair state.
Results
Experimental setup
Our experimental scheme^{13,19,20,45} is shown in Fig. 1a,b: by coupling the excited state e〉 and the Rydberg state S^{(g)}〉 with a strong light field Ω_{g} with detuning δ_{g}, a gate photon is converted into a Rydberg excitation inside a cloud of ultracold ^{87}Rb atoms. We then probe the presence of this gate excitation by monitoring the transmission of source photons coupled via electromagnetically induced transparency (EIT) to the source Rydberg state S^{(s)}. Specifically, we use (δ_{g}=40 MHz) for efficient Raman absorption of the gate photon in the experiments without retrieval, while we use EITbased slow light techniques (δ_{g}=0) for photon storage in experiments with gate photon retrieval. At zero electric field, the interaction between the S^{(g)},S^{(s)}〉 pair is of van der Waals type. The difference in electric polarizability between S and Pstates enables the shift of the initial pair state into degeneracy with specific P^{(g)},P^{(s)}〉 pairs, resulting in resonant dipole–dipole interaction. We shift the Rydberg levels by applying a homogeneous electric field along the direction of beam propagation. Active cancellation of stray electric fields is done with eight electric field plates in Löw configuration^{48}, while the homogeneous field results from additional voltages V^{+},V^{−} to four electrodes (Fig. 1a).
Starktuned optical nonlinearities
We first study the pair state S^{(g)},S^{(s)}〉=66S_{1/2},64S_{1/2}〉. Due to the fine structure splitting of the Rydberg Pstates, this pair is near resonant with two Pstate pairs 65P_{1/2},64P_{3/2}〉 and 65P_{3/2},64P_{1/2}〉^{20}. Both P^{(g)},P^{(s)}〉 pairs can be tuned into resonance at electric fields . The full pair state Stark map in the presence of a magnetic field B=1 G (Fig. 1c, gray lines) reveals a large number of closely spaced resonances arising from the nondegenerate combinations. The strength of individual resonances depends on the angle θ between the interatomic axis and the quantization axis defined by the external fields, resulting in a nonspherical blockade volume^{29}. We explore these resonances by measuring the optical gain
that is, the mean number of source photons scattered by a single incident gate photon^{20}, as a function of applied electric field (Fig. 1c). Our highresolution spectroscopy indeed reveals four resonances, matching with the calculated crossings of different pair state groups. In between resonances, the coupling of S^{(g)},S^{(s)}〉 to multiple P^{(g)},P^{(s)}〉 pair states with positive and negative Förster defects results in smaller blockade than in the zerofield case. This interplay between different resonances actually decreases the measured gain with respect to the fieldfree value. This situation does not occur for the Förster resonance 50S_{1/2},48S_{1/2}〉↔49P_{1/2},48P_{1/2}〉 at (Fig. 1d). For this state combination there is one isolated resonance, resulting in the single peak in the optical gain.
Rydberg polaritons near Förster resonance
To quantitatively describe the observed resonances, we include in the microscopic description of polariton propagation^{13,14,26} the special character of the interaction close to Förster resonance, see Supplementary Note 1. For illustration, we consider the 50S_{1/2},48S_{1/2}〉 pair and angle θ=0, which results in the selection rule for the magnetic quantum numbers of the involved states. We then need to include four pair states: {50S_{1/2},48S_{1/2}〉, 49P_{1/2},48P_{1/2}〉, 48P_{1/2},49P_{1/2}〉, 48S_{1/2},50S_{1/2}〉} with . In this basis, the interaction Hamiltonian reduces to
with two dipolar coupling parameters C_{3}, C_{3}′. Since the interaction is dominated by the Förster resonance, we neglect any residual van der Waals interactions. In general, the Hamiltonian (2) gives rise to flipflop (hopping) processes of type 50S_{1/2},48S_{1/2}〉→{49P_{1/2},48P_{1/2}〉, 48P_{1/2},49P_{1/2}〉}→48S_{1/2},50S_{1/2}〉. However, for this choice of Rydberg states the dipolar coupling parameters satisfy C_{3}≫C_{3}′, and therefore provide a strong suppression of hopping^{49}. This behaviour is in contrast to the results in ref. 47, where hopping processes strongly influenced the interactionmediated imaging of Rydberg excitations. In the experimentally relevant regime with ω, γ_{s}, γ_{p}<<Ω, γ, where ω is the source photon detuning, while γ_{s} and γ_{p} describe the decoherence rates of S^{(s)}〉 and P^{(s)}〉 excitations, the equation describing a single polariton and its interaction with the gate Rydberg excitation S^{(g)}〉 at position r_{j} simplifies to
as derived in our Supplementary Note 1. Here is the collective coupling strength with g_{0} being the singleatom–photon coupling strength and n_{at} is the atomic density. The effective interaction simplifies to
where Δ_{D} is the Förster defect. It is remarkable that, regardless of Δ_{D}, our microscopic derivation provides an effective interaction always based on van der Waals type interaction.
For comparison with experiment, we generalize our calculation to nonzero angles θ between the quantization and interatomic axis, as well as to the larger number of states involved for the 66S_{1/2}, 64S_{1/2}〉 pair. We then integrate equation (3) over the cloud shape and average over the stored spinwave. We also take into account the Poissonian statistics of the gate and source photons, the storage efficiency, the fact that the blockade radius is comparable to the beam waist and the finite experimental resolution in electric field , see Supplementary Note 1. The comparison, without any free parameters, with experimental results for the gain is shown in Fig. 1. We find very good agreement for all electric fields except very close to the resonances. One reason for the discrepancy is the following: Close to the Förster resonance and for distances on the order of r_{b} between gate and source, the atomic part of the polaritonexcitation pair initially in 50S_{1/2},48S_{1/2}〉 is converted into the superposition of 49P_{1/2},48P_{1/2}〉 and 50S_{1/2},48S_{1/2}〉. This results in additional slowing down of the polariton, and, consequently, an accumulation of polaritons close to r_{b}. Then, the assumption to study the propagation of individual polaritons breaks down as the interaction between the polaritons has to be included.
Resonant singlephoton transistor
Next, we investigate to what extent these Förster resonances can be used to improve the Rydberg singlephoton transistor^{19,20}. We find that for this application, the 50S_{1/2}, 48S_{1/2}〉 resonance is ideal. It enables largesource photon input rates, because of the relatively weak van der Waals interaction between two source photons. On the other hand, the Förster resonance provides sufficient gate–source interaction to observe high transistor gain. For source photon rate R_{in}=35 μs^{−1}, we reach a maximal gain of . At such high source rates, we observe small temporal changes in transmission, which we attribute to an accumulation of stationary Rydberg excitations in the medium caused by dephasing of singlesource polaritons. This effect has been previously observed for Rydberg Sstates^{14} and differs from the interactioninduced dephasing of Dstate polariton pairs^{50}. This accumulation sets an upper limit on the source photon rate for the nondestructive imaging of single Rydberg excitations^{45}, since the creation of additional Rydberg atoms also ‘destroys’ the original system. We thus restrict our analysis in Fig. 2 to nondestructive source input rates for which the maximum temporal change in source transmission remains <10%. In this regime, we observe a linear increase of the optical gain with R_{in} both at zero electric field and on the Förster resonance (Fig. 2a). Exploiting the Förster resonance, we can improve the optical gain by a factor >2 on resonance (blue dots) compared with the zerofield case (blue squares). The large number of source photons scattered from a singlegate excitation enables the singleshot detection of a stored gate photon with high fidelity^{18,19,51}, see Methods. In Fig. 2, we show this fidelity as a function of the applied electric field for two source photon rates. The Förster resonance enables a substantial increase of the fidelity to a maximal value of . This number is mainly limited by the fact that our beam waist w_{0} is slightly larger than the gate–source blockade distance. For spatially resolved Rydberg detection^{45,46}, even higher fidelities are possible using imaging systems with better optical resolution than our beam size w_{0}=6.2 μm.
Singlephoton transistor with gate photon readout
The improved gate–source interaction on Förster resonance enables us for the first time to operate our transistor with retrieval of the stored gate photon after the transistor operation^{51}. To store the gate photon, we stop the polariton inside the medium by ramping down the control field Ω_{g} to zero for δ_{g}=0. Conversely, to read out the gate photon, Ω_{g} is turned on again. Without any source photon input between the storage and the readout, we measure a lifetime of 3.6 μs for the atomic coherence of the stored gate spinwave, mainly limited by the finite temperature of our atomic sample. Next, we apply a source pulse containing a mean number of photons and pulse length T=3.2 μs during a storage time of 4.2 μs. On Förster resonance, we achieve a mean number of scattered source photons within this time of up to 2.7 photons for a single stored gate photon (Fig. 3a). This is the first demonstration of a transistor with gain and readout, a fundamental step towards quantum circuits employing feedback and gain or the nondestructive detection of the gate photon^{52}.
The overall fidelity of the transistor is limited by projection and dephasing of the gate spinwave due to scattered and transmitted source photons^{51,53}. In Fig. 3a, we show the absolute retrieval efficiency versus incident and scattered source photons at a mean number of incident gate photons on and off the Förster resonance. Interestingly, both cases collapse onto one exponential decay if plotted versus the number of scattered source photons. The black curve in Fig. 3a assumes zero retrieval fidelity for one or more scattered source photons. The dotted line and the dashed line, on the other hand, investigate the other hypothetic cases that the coherence of the gate spinwave is destroyed by one photon of incident mean photons (dashed) and by one photon of mean photons incident on the blockade sphere (dotted), respectively. By applying established theory to our data in the next section, we will show that both transmitted photons and scattered photons contribute to the coherence and thus to the retrieval efficiency of the stored spinwave.
Theory on coherent spinwaves
For more quantitative analysis we follow ref. 53, considering a onedimensional (1D) model of the zerofield case for a singlesource photon passing through the atomic cloud with Gaussian density profile. The gate photon is stored in the initial spinwave state and interacts with source photons via the potential from equation (4). After the source photon has left the atomic cloud, the state of the atomic ensemble is , and the quantum mechanical fidelity between the initial and final state is given by (ref. 54). Here, F_{p} accounts for transmitted and F_{s} for scattered source polaritons. Both contributions are shown in Fig. 3b as a function of the blockade radius r_{b}=(γC_{6}/Ω^{2})^{1/6} for our experimental parameters. For large blockade radii, F_{p} becomes negligible because source photons are rarely transmitted through the blockaded region. To describe the experimental 3D situation, we average the fidelities from Fig. 3b over the spatial transversal distribution of gate and source photons. With this approach, we obtain the blue solid line in Fig. 3a, which is in very good agreement with our data, despite the simplifications of our model. We consider this as evidence for the assumed mechanisms for the spinwave decoherence to be correct. By identifying the decoherence mechanisms, we can isolate the required improvements for a highfidelity coherent Rydberg transistor: the blockade volume of a singlegate excitation must be larger than the stored gate spinwave to avoid the projection, while the optical depth OD_{B} inside the blockaded region must be large to prevent the dephasing due to transmitted photons. Meeting both requirements simultaneously is challenging due to limits on the atomic density because of Rydbergground state interaction^{18,55}.
Discussion
Rydbergmediated singlephoton nonlinearities can be greatly enhanced by electrically tuning adjacent pair states to Förster resonance. By carefully choosing the employed Förster resonance, we have simultaneously improved the Rydberg transistor gain and the fidelity of single Rydberg atom detection. We identify the 50S_{1/2},48S_{1/2}〉↔49P_{1/2},48P_{1/2}〉 resonance in ^{87}Rb as ideal both for the Rydberg singlephoton transistor and nondestructive imaging of Rydberg atoms^{45,46}. Exploiting this resonance, we have demonstrated the first operation of the Rydberg transistor with readout of the gate photon. Our quantitative analysis of the reduction of retrieval efficiency caused by source photons points the way towards highfidelity Rydbergbased photonic gates and transistors. Our polariton propagation theory correctly accounts for the enhanced source–gate interaction and is in excellent agreement with the experiment. It also reveals unexpected and rich properties close to Förster resonances. This regime enables study of the transition from two to manybody interaction and propagation with excitation hopping^{47,56}. The complexity of the resonances due to the Rydberglevel structure provides a wide range of tuning options. The gate–source interaction can be reduced or even switched off between individual resonances. Similarly, by addressing different Zeeman pair state resonances with the external field the angular dependence of the interaction can be greatly varied. This provides a rich set of new tools for tailoring the interaction of photons coupled to different Rydberg states inside the medium.
Methods
Preparation of the ultracold atomic sample
We load ^{87}Rb from a constant Rubidium background pressure of 10^{−9} mbar atoms into a magnetooptical trap (MOT). Simultaneously, a crossed optical dipole trap (ODT) from a fibre laser at a wavelength of 1,070 nm superimposes the MOT and attracts atoms of both 5^{2}S_{1/2} hyperfine ground states (F=1,2). After 1 s of loading, the MOT is compressed by ramping up the quadrupole magnetic field by a factor of 8 during 40 ms followed by an optical molasses phase of 5 ms, to maximize the number of atoms loaded into the ODT. The intensity of the ODT laser is ramped down within 200 ms to perform forced evaporation yielding 2 × 10^{4} atoms with a temperature 3 μK in a cigar shaped trapping potential with a 1/e half length of L=40 μm and a radius of R=10 μm. Finally, by shining in two pumping lasers, we transfer atoms from the F=1 state to the F=2 state and optically pump the population to the stretched state m_{F}=2.
Probing the optical nonlinearity
The gate excitation and the source EIT are realized with four independent laser systems, with the lower transition gate and source photons (near)resonant to the MOT transition to achieve a maximum optical depth and thus highest efficiency of singlephoton absorption. The upper transition is at 480 nm. All four laser beams are overlapped on one axis with polarization optics and dichroic mirrors. Achromatic lenses are used from both sides to focus and collimate the laser beams. The transmitted source and gate photons are coupled through singlemode fibres and detected on commercial avalanche photodiodes. Taking loss at optics and fibre coupling into account, photons in the experiment are detected with an efficiency of 30%.
Data acquisition
To reduce the statistical error, we average over multiple experiments. For instance, the data points in Fig. 1c are gathered during 23 transistor measurements per MOT cycle. We measure at 1 electric field during 20 MOT cycles. The same procedure is repeated for the reference measurement which contains no gate photons. The fields are scanned in a triangular electric field scan which was repeated 15 times. That way, systematic errors are suppressed. In addition, by monitoring the source transmission we make sure that electric field drifts are negligible during the measurement. A similar procedure was done to measure the data in Fig. 2, but with yet another scan dimension, the source photon rate.
Single Rydberg detection
The attenuation of many source photons due to one gate photon (gain) is used to predict the singleshot existence of a gate Rydberg excitation via the number of detected source photons. If a low number of source photons is detected, probably a gate excitation was present which attenuated the source. Likewise, if a high number of source photons is detected, probably the gate excitation was absent. To quantify the minimum probability of the correct prediction (detection fidelity), we take two histograms of detected source photons, with and without incident gate photons, respectively. With the knowledge of the storage efficiency (60%) and the Poissonian statistics of the coherent gate photons (mean value ), it is possible to separate the histogram with this mean gate photon input into two histograms, one corresponding to the events with no gate excitations present and one with gate excitations. With a discrimination line, we set a threshold value for the decision whether or not the excitation was present. Any overlap of both histograms through this line results in a fidelity .
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Additional information
How to cite this article: Gorniaczyk, H. et al. Enhancement of Rydbergmediated singlephoton nonlinearities by electrically tuned Förster resonances. Nat. Commun. 7:12480 doi: 10.1038/ncomms12480 (2016).
References
 1
Saffman, M., Walker, T. G. & Mølmer, K. Quantum information with Rydberg atoms. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 2313 (2010).
 2
Wilk, T. et al. Entanglement of two individual neutral atoms using Rydberg blockade. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 010502 (2010).
 3
Isenhower, L. et al. Demonstration of a neutral atom controlledNOT quantum gate. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 010503 (2010).
 4
Weimer, H., Müller, M., Lesanovsky, I., Zoller, P. & Büchler, H. P. A Rydberg quantum simulator. Nat. Phys. 6, 382–388 (2010).
 5
Jau, Y.Y., Hankin, A. M., Keating, T., Deutsch, I. H. & Biedermann, G. W. Entangling atomic spins with a Rydbergdressed spinflip blockade. Nat. Phys. 12, 71–74 (2015).
 6
Schauß, P. et al. Observation of spatially ordered structures in a twodimensional Rydberg gas. Nature 491, 87–91 (2012).
 7
Schauß, P. et al. Crystallization in Ising quantum magnets. Science 347, 1455–1458 (2015).
 8
Weber, T. M. et al. Mesoscopic Rydbergblockaded ensembles in the superatom regime and beyond. Nat. Phys. 11, 157–161 (2015).
 9
Glaetzle, A. W. et al. Designing frustrated quantum magnets with laserdressed Rydberg atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 173002 (2015).
 10
van Bijnen, R. M. W. & Pohl, T. Quantum magnetism and topological ordering via Rydberg dressing near Förster resonances. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 243002 (2015).
 11
Friedler, I., Petrosyan, D., Fleischhauer, M. & Kurizki, G. Longrange interactions and entanglement of slow singlephoton pulses. Phys. Rev. A 72, 043803 (2005).
 12
Pritchard, J. D. et al. Cooperative atomlight interaction in a blockaded Rydberg ensemble. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 193603 (2010).
 13
Gorshkov, A. V., Otterbach, J., Fleischhauer, M., Pohl, T. & Lukin, M. D. Photonphoton interactions via Rydberg blockade. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 133602 (2011).
 14
Peyronel, T. et al. Quantum nonlinear optics with single photons enabled by strongly interacting atoms. Nature 488, 57–60 (2012).
 15
Dudin, Y. O. & Kuzmich, A. Strongly interacting Rydberg excitations of a cold atomic gas. Science 336, 887–889 (2012).
 16
Maxwell, D. et al. Storage and control of optical photons using Rydberg polaritons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 103001 (2013).
 17
Li, L., Dudin, Y. O. & Kuzmich, A. Entanglement between light and an optical atomic excitation. Nature 498, 466–469 (2013).
 18
Baur, S., Tiarks, D., Rempe, G. & Dürr, S. Singlephoton switch based on Rydberg blockade. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 073901 (2014).
 19
Gorniaczyk, H., Tresp, C., Schmidt, J., Fedder, H. & Hofferberth, S. Singlephoton transistor mediated by interstate Rydberg interactions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 053601 (2014).
 20
Tiarks, D., Baur, S., Schneider, K., Dürr, S. & Rempe, G. Singlephoton transistor using a Förster resonance. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 053602 (2014).
 21
Tresp, C. et al. Singlephoton absorber based on strongly interacting Rydberg atoms. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1605.04456 (2016).
 22
Parigi, V. et al. Observation and measurement of interactioninduced dispersive optical nonlinearities in an ensemble of cold Rydberg atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 233602 (2012).
 23
Tiarks, D., Schmidt, S., Rempe, G. & Dürr, S. Optical π phase shift created with a singlephoton pulse. Sci. Adv. 2, e1600036 (2016).
 24
Firstenberg, O. et al. Attractive photons in a quantum nonlinear medium. Nature 502, 71–75 (2013).
 25
Otterbach, J., Moos, M., Muth, D. & Fleischhauer, M. Wigner crystallization of single photons in cold Rydberg ensembles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 113001 (2013).
 26
Bienias, P. et al. Scattering resonances and bound states for strongly interacting Rydberg polaritons. Phys. Rev. A 90, 053804 (2014).
 27
Singer, K., Stanojevic, J., Weidemüller, M. & Côté, R. Longrange interactions between alkali Rydberg atom pairs correlated to the n sn s, n pn p and n dn d asymptotes. J. Phys. B 38, S295–S307 (2005).
 28
Schwettmann, A., Crawford, J., Overstreet, K. R. & Shaffer, J. P. Cold cs Rydberggas interactions. Phys. Rev. A 74, 020701 (2006).
 29
Walker, T. G. & Saffman, M. Consequences of Zeeman degeneracy for the van der Waals blockade between Rydberg atoms. Phys. Rev. A 77, 032723 (2008).
 30
Gallagher, T. F. & Pillet, P. In Advances in Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, Vol. 56 161–218Academic Press (2008).
 31
Comparat, D. & Pillet, P. Dipole blockade in a cold Rydberg atomic sample. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 27, A208–A232 (2010).
 32
Lukin, M. D. et al. Dipole blockade and quantum information processing in mesoscopic atomic ensembles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 037901 (2001).
 33
Afrousheh, K. et al. Spectroscopic observation of resonant electric dipole–dipole interactions between cold Rydberg atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 233001 (2004).
 34
BohlouliZanjani, P., Petrus, J. A. & Martin, J. D. D. Enhancement of Rydberg atom interactions using ac stark shifts. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 203005 (2007).
 35
Vogt, T. et al. Dipole blockade at Förster resonances in high resolution laser excitation of Rydberg states of cesium atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 083003 (2006).
 36
Ryabtsev, I. I., Tretyakov, D. B., Beterov, I. I. & Entin, V. M. Observation of the starktuned förster resonance between two Rydberg atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 073003 (2010).
 37
Reinhard, A. et al. Doubleresonance spectroscopy of interacting Rydbergatom systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 233201 (2008).
 38
Reinhard, A., Younge, K. C. & Raithel, G. Effect of Förster resonances on the excitation statistics of manybody Rydberg systems. Phys. Rev. A 78, 060702 (2008).
 39
Nipper, J. et al. Highly resolved measurements of starktuned Förster resonances between Rydberg atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 113001 (2012).
 40
Nipper, J. et al. Atomic pairstate interferometer: controlling and measuring an interactioninduced phase shift in Rydbergatom pairs. Phys. Rev. X 2, 031011 (2012).
 41
Gurian, J. H. et al. Observation of a resonant fourbody interaction in cold cesium Rydberg atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 023005 (2012).
 42
Ravets, S., Labuhn, H., Barredo, D., Lahaye, T. & Browaeys, A. Measurement of the angular dependence of the dipole–dipole interaction between two individual Rydberg atoms at a Förster resonance. Phys. Rev. A 92, 020701 (2015).
 43
Pelle, B. et al. Quasiforbidden twobody Förster resonances in a cold Cs Rydberg gas. Phys. Rev. A 93, 023417 (2016).
 44
Beterov, I. I. & Saffman, M. Rydberg blockade, Förster resonances, and quantum state measurements with different atomic species. Phys. Rev. A 92, 042710 (2015).
 45
Günter, G. et al. Interaction enhanced imaging of individual Rydberg atoms in dense gases. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 013002 (2012).
 46
Olmos, B., Li, W., Hofferberth, S. & Lesanovsky, I. Amplifying single impurities immersed in a gas of ultracold atoms. Phys. Rev. A 84, 041607 (2011).
 47
Günter, G. et al. Observing the dynamics of dipolemediated energy transport by interactionenhanced imaging. Science 342, 954–956 (2013).
 48
Löw, R. et al. An experimental and theoretical guide to strongly interacting Rydberg gases. J. Phys. B 45, 113001 (2012).
 49
ParisMandoki, A., Gorniaczyk, H., Tresp, C., Mirgorodskiy, I. & Hofferberth, S. Tailoring Rydberg interactions via Förster resonances: state combinations, hopping and angular dependence. J. Phys. B 49, 164001 (2016).
 50
Tresp, C. et al. Dipolar dephasing of Rydberg Dstate polaritons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 083602 (2015).
 51
Chen, W. et al. Alloptical switch and transistor gated by one stored photon. Science 341, 768–770 (2013).
 52
Reiserer, A., Ritter, S. & Rempe, G. Nondestructive detection of an optical photon. Science 342, 1349–1351 (2013).
 53
Li, W. & Lesanovsky, I. Coherence in a coldatom photon switch. Phys. Rev. A 92, 043828 (2015).
 54
Uhlmann, A. The ‘transition probability’ in the state space of a *algebra. Rep. Math. Phys. 9, 273–279 (1976).
 55
Gaj, A. et al. From molecular spectra to a density shift in dense Rydberg gases. Nat. Commun. 5, 4546 (2014).
 56
Li, W., Viscor, D., Hofferberth, S. & Lesanovsky, I. Electromagnetically induced transparency in an entangled medium. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 243601 (2014).
Acknowledgements
We thank Johannes Schmidt for construction of the electric field control; Sebastian Weber for calculation of Rydberg potentials; and Christian Zimmer for contribution to the experiment. This work is funded by the German Research Foundation through EmmyNoethergrant HO 4787/11 and within the SFB/TRR21. H.G. acknowledges support from the CarlZeiss Foundation. I.L. acknowledges funding from the European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP/2007–2013)/ERC Grant Agreement No. 335266 (ESCQUMA), the EUFET Grant No. 512862 (HAIRS), the H2020FETPROACT2014 Grant No. 640378 (RYSQ) and EPSRC Grant No. EP/M014266/1. W.L. is supported through the Nottingham Research Fellowship by the University of Nottingham and acknowledges access to the University of Nottingham HPC Facility.
Author information
Affiliations
Contributions
The experiment was conceived by H.G., C.T. and S.H. and carried out by H.G., C.T., A.P.M., and I.M.; data analysis was done by H.G., A.P.M. and C.T.; theory models and calculations were contributed by P.B., W.L., H.P.B., and I.L.; H.G. and S.H. wrote the manuscript with contributions from all authors.
Corresponding authors
Correspondence to H. Gorniaczyk or S. Hofferberth.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Note 1 and Supplementary References (PDF 167 kb)
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Received
Accepted
Published
DOI
Further reading

Singlephoton transistor based on cavity electromagnetically induced transparency with Rydberg atomic ensemble
Scientific Reports (2019)

Unidirectional and controllable higherorder diffraction by a Rydberg electromagnetically induced grating
Physical Review A (2019)

Solitary waves in strongly nonlocal media with a harmonic potential
Pramana (2019)

Stable single light bullets and vortices and their active control in cold Rydberg gases
Optica (2019)

Nonlinear quantum optics for spinor slow light
Physical Review A (2018)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.