Semiconductors with strong spin–orbit interaction as the underlying mechanism for the generation of spin-polarized electrons are showing potential for applications in spintronic devices. Unveiling the full spin texture in momentum space for such materials and its relation to the microscopic structure of the electronic wave functions is experimentally challenging and yet essential for exploiting spin–orbit effects for spin manipulation. Here we employ a state-of-the-art photoelectron momentum microscope with a multichannel spin filter to directly image the spin texture of the layered polar semiconductor BiTeI within the full two-dimensional momentum plane. Our experimental results, supported by relativistic ab initio calculations, demonstrate that the valence and conduction band electrons in BiTeI have spin textures of opposite chirality and of pronounced orbital dependence beyond the standard Rashba model, the latter giving rise to strong optical selection-rule effects on the photoelectron spin polarization. These observations open avenues for spin-texture manipulation by atomic-layer and charge carrier control in polar semiconductors.
The coupling between spin and orbital degrees of freedom has emerged as a crucial feature in the electronic structure of semiconductors and low-dimensional materials1,2,3. The fundamental influence of spin–orbit interaction on the electronic wave functions gives rise to topologically protected surface states and to characteristic spin textures, in both real and momentum space. Making use of these effects to control the electron spin is a central goal in spintronics. In particular, the Rashba effect4, allowing for spin manipulation via electric fields, is often used in proposed devices, such as spin-field and spin Hall effect transistors5,6,7,8. Rashba-type spin–orbit interaction induces chiral spin textures in the electronic structure by coupling the electron momentum and spin degrees of freedom9. Identifying materials with large spin splittings where the spin texture at the Fermi surface can be modified by external parameters will introduce enhanced versatility in controlling spin-dependent transport properties. Recent proposals in this direction include, for example, ferroelectric semiconductors where spin–orbit coupling is influenced by the switchable electric polarization10,11.
Layered van-der-Waals materials are studied extensively due to their extraordinary bulk and surface electronic properties, which are considered to be promising for various technological applications12,13. Strong spin–orbit effects can be achieved in these compounds by incorporation of heavy atoms, such as in Bi2Te3 and Bi2Se3 that realize topological insulators with non-trivial spin-polarized surface states3. A related class of layered semiconductors is represented by BiTeI whose polar bulk crystal structure is built of ionically bound (BiTe)+ and I− layers. The resulting electric polarization along the layer stacking axis facilitates a giant Rashba effect in the electronic structure of BiTeI and related materials14,15,16,17. It also gives rise to a pronounced n-type or p-type band bending at the surface in dependence of the nominal charge of the terminating atomic layer18,19. This makes it possible to place either valence or conduction band states at the Fermi level by choice of the surface termination18.
In this work we directly image the full momentum-dependent spin textures of the valence and conduction band-derived states in BiTeI by the use of spin-resolved photoelectron momentum microscopy, a highly efficient technique for determining spin-dependent band structures in solids that only recently has become available20,21,22. Surprisingly, our measurements reveal opposite spin chiralities for electronic states at the valence band top and at the conduction band bottom, despite the fixed polar electric field vector determined by the (BiTe)+-I− stacking sequence. This implies the possibility to modify the spin texture through control of the charge carrier type, which, in BiTeI, could be realized through n-type and p-type band bending in dependence of surface termination18. Our observations strongly support a previous theory that predicts Rashba parameters of opposite sign in the conduction and valence band as a generic feature in semiconductors with giant spin–orbit interaction23. Furthermore, our measurements provide evidence for an additional orbital dependence of the Rashba effect in these materials24,25. This manifests itself in pronounced changes of the measured photoelectron spin textures depending on the polarization of the exciting light, which are in sharp contrast to the metallic Rashba system Au(111)22,26 but in remarkable correspondence to recent findings in the topological insulator Bi2Se3 (refs 26, 27).
Rashba splitting of conduction and valence band states in BiTeI
Our analysis concentrates on the two surface states shown in Fig. 1a. Both states host a large Rashba-type spin splitting demonstrated by the black and white markers that trace the dispersion of the states. The upper band derives from the conduction band and has a positive effective mass ; the second band, with a negative effective mass , develops from the valence band. The conduction and valence band surface states have been shown to be located on Te- and I-terminated surface areas, respectively. The latter correspond to two types of stacking-fault-induced domains in the bulk of BiTeI in which the atomic stacking order and thus the crystalline z axis are inverted, as illustrated in Fig. 1b (refs 18, 28). Owing to the presence of both domain types in the bulk, the natural cleavage plane between Te and I layers exposes Te- and I-terminated areas on the same surface. Both terminations occur to the same extent on the sample surface with domain widths of 10–100 nm (refs 19, 28, 29). The momentum microscope employed for our experiments probes a sample area of ∼20 μm in diameter. Therefore, in our measurements we are able to probe both states simultaneously.
Spin-texture inversion and sign change of the Rashba parameter
We performed band structure calculations based on density functional theory, to capture the ground-state spin polarization in the surface electronic structure. The calculated spin-resolved Rashba-split surface state dispersions for the Te- and I-terminated BiTeI surfaces are shown in Fig. 2a by open circles superimposed onto the experimentally obtained electronic structure. The calculated binding energies were adjusted individually for the two terminations, to match the respective experimental binding energies. Calculated constant energy contours for the conduction band surface state and valence band surface state are displayed in Fig. 2b,c, respectively. Here, the red and blue colours indicate the positive/negative sign of the Sy cartesian spin component. The conduction band surface state (Fig. 2b) and the valence band surface state (Fig. 2c) show a circular inner structure and a slightly warped outer one. Between the outer sub-bands of the two states, a reversal of the spin polarization occurs. More precisely, we find a clockwise spin chirality in the outer sub-band of the conduction band state and a anti-clockwise chirality in the outer branch of the valence band state. The inner contour of the conduction band state shows a reversed spin polarization compared with the outer one, whereas for the valence band state both branches have the same spin polarization as expected for energies above the Rashba degeneracy point.
The theoretical result is nicely reproduced by our measured spin polarization obtained with an imaging spin filter installed in a momentum microscope. The data are shown in Fig. 2d,e where the red (blue) colour code once again represents the spin polarization along the y axis. The conduction band state was probed at a binding energy of 100 meV as illustrated by the red horizontal line in Fig. 2a. The measured spin polarization is highest along the two dotted circles in Fig. 2d, which indicate the two sub-bands of the spin-split state. It is reversed between the outer and inner circle, reflecting an opposite spin chirality of the two branches in line with the general Rashba picture. The switch of the spin polarization between the two branches can be inferred in more detail from the polarization plot along the wave vectors kx at ky=0 Å−1 shown above the momentum map. The spin polarization is opposite at ∼+0.12 and −0.12 Å−1, which corresponds to the outer branch. It also switches between ∼+0.04 and −0.04 Å−1 where the inner structure lies.
The spin polarization of the valence band state, measured at a binding energy of 650 meV, is shown in Fig. 2e. Black dotted circles serve as guides to the eye. The data show an opposite spin texture compared with the outer branch of the conduction band state. The spin polarization along kx shown above the colour plot reveals the sign switch at ∼kx=0 Å−1 from negative to positive polarization.
Based on the excellent agreement between the experimental and calculated spin chiralities, we will now discuss the relative sign of the spin textures in the probed bands. In general, the Rashba splitting in BiTeI originates from the polar atomic-layer stacking along the crystalline z direction that gives rise to a net electric field Ez across the unit cell, as sketched in Fig. 1b. This holds for the Rashba splitting of the bulk electronic bands but also for one of the surface bands17. The latter split off in energy from the respective bulk bands due to modifications in the near-surface potential and thereby inherit the Rashba splitting and spin texture from the bulk states. For the present measurements it is therefore important to take into consideration that the two probed surface states are located in domains with reversed atomic stacking order, which inverts the electric field Ez generating the Rashba splitting (see Fig. 1b). This reversal of the crystalline z axis in one of the domains naturally implies an inversion of the spin textures of electronic states located in this domain16, which needs be taken into account in a comparison between the two states.
Within the Rashba model the spin splitting is described by the Rashba parameter αR. Its magnitude determines the size of the splitting, whereas its sign αR/|αR| defines the spin chirality30. More precisely, the sign of αR determines whether the upper branch E+ of a Rashba split band has anti-clockwise or clockwise spin chirality and conversely for the lower branch E−. Therefore, by determining the chiralities in the valence and conduction band states, one can identify the relative sign between the Rashba parameters that characterize the conduction band bottom and valence band top. Doing so in Fig. 2 we find, in both the experiment and the calculation, that the upper branch of the conduction band state , located in a Te-terminated domain, and the upper branch of the valence band state , located in an I-terminated domain, have the same chirality. Taking into account the spin-texture reversal originating from the opposite orientation of the crystalline z axis in the two domains, we thus infer opposite Rashba parameters for the valence band state and the conduction band state.
In a simplified picture where the Rashba parameter is proportional to the symmetry-breaking electric field, αR∝Ez, this result may appear surprising. However, model calculations predicted that Rashba parameters of opposite sign in the topmost valence and lowest conduction band are indeed a generic feature of the band structure of BiTeI23, in agreement with the present observations. In fact, it is the coupling between these two bands, being mediated by spin–orbit interaction, which gives rise to Rashba parameters of large magnitude and of opposite sign.
It is noteworthy that in the experimental data of the valence band state (Fig. 2e) the outer and inner branch cannot be resolved due to the fact that the measurement was taken at an energy above the Rashba degeneracy point where the spin polarization should have the same sign. In addition, the I termination is highly liable to ageing effects that gradually shift the state to higher binding energies during the timescale of the experiment28,29, which leads to a smearing out of the measured spin polarization. We therefore show a calculation at 150 meV above the Rashba degeneracy point for the valence band surface state in Fig. 2c, which represents the spin polarization in the measured energy range. The ageing effect also explains the differences between the measured surface states shown in Figs 1a and 2a.
Orbital dependence of the spin texture
To gather insight into the interplay between the electron spin and the involved orbitals, we performed an additional set of spin-resolved measurements on the conduction band state where we used linearly polarized light with a photon energy of hν=6 eV. Switching the polarization from s- to p-polarization allows to address different p-orbitals, as the photoemission dipole matrix element changes with light polarization . The initial state wave function along kx can be written as , where the spin ↑, ↓ is quantized along the y axis31,32. It follows that s-polarized light mainly excites electrons from the py orbital, while the px and pz orbitals are excited by p-polarized light33. A strong dependence of the photoelectron spin polarization on the polarization of the incoming light has been predicted for different spin–orbit coupled materials34,35 and shown for topological surface states26,27,36 and for the case of unpolarized ground states37,38.
Indeed, the results of the measurements that are shown in Fig. 3a,b clearly shows a different spin texture when the light polarization is changed. The two-dimensional (2D) photoelectron spin texture is almost symmetric when measured with s-polarized light, whereas a large asymmetry occurs for p-polarized light. This corresponds to the light polarization , which obeys mirror symmetry along ±kx for s-polarization but breaks mirror symmetry for p-polarization. When measured with s-polarized light, the detected spin polarization Sy switches from positive (red) at −kx to negative (blue) at +kx. At ∼kx=0 Å−1, the spin polarization becomes zero. It is noteworthy that only the outer branch is resolved, which we attribute to bulk bands that overlap with the surface state at small k|| (ref. 15). For the measurement with p-polarized light, the situation is different; in particular the spin polarization at −kx is negative, whereas we find a positive spin polarization at positive kx values. This result already provides evidence for a coupling between the spin and the different p-orbitals.
To understand precisely how this coupling is realized, we analyse the calculated cartesian spin components projected onto the px, py and pz orbitals as shown in Fig. 3c,d, respectively. Here, the black arrows adjacent to the contours indicate the in-plane spin polarization, while orange and green colours stand for the positive/negative sign of the Sz component. The in-plane spin polarization at points along high-symmetry directions is additionally highlighted by bold arrows. The corresponding points in momentum space are marked by grey dots in the experimental data and labelled with k1–k4.
Along – at k1 and k2, the calculated in-plane spin polarization is aligned parallel to the y axis. The spin polarization in the py orbital has opposite sign when compared with the px and the pz orbital at these points. This corresponds to the experimental data where Sy has opposite sign for s- and p-polarized light. At k3 and k4, which lie along −, the calculated ground-state spin polarization has an in-plane component Sx parallel to the x axis, which has the same sign for the py and pz orbital and is reversed for the px orbital.
A similar photoelectron spin-texture inversion between s- and p-polarized light has been observed for the spin-polarized topological surface state on Bi2Se3 (refs 26, 27, 39, 40). It is absent, however, for the Rashba-split surface state of Au(111)22,26, a longstanding paradigm for spin–orbit splitting at surfaces41,42. It has therefore been unclear whether such manipulation of the photoelectron spin polarization is a generic feature due to spin–orbit coupling or related also to material-specific details of Bi2Se3, as in particular its non-trivial topology43. The present experimental results show that topology plays no significant role, and that very strong spin–orbit interaction, as introduced by heavy elements as for instance Bi, may be necessary to generate sufficient spin–orbital mixing.
In the experimental data we find a spin polarization close to zero at k3 and k4 for the s-polarized light. Therefore, no Sy contribution is measured in line with the calculated result for py. For the p-polarized light on the other hand, a spin polarization signal Sy of equal sign is measured at k3 and k4. This spin component parallel to the wave vector differs from the ground-state calculations and the general expectation from a simple Rashba picture. Radial components in the spin polarization have, for instance, been measured in the topological insulator Bi2Se3 and explained by a layer-dependent interference effect between different orbital contributions during the photoemission process27,44.
It is worth noting that the photoelectron spin polarization measured with an unpolarized light source with a photon energy of hν=21.2 eV (shown in Fig. 2d) has the same sign as the spin polarization measured at hν=6 eV with s-polarized light. For unpolarized light—at least for metallic surfaces—we expect a p-like polarization inside the sample according to the Fresnel equations45. This result therefore suggests a possible photon energy dependence of the spin polarization. The spin-up and spin-down parts of the wave function are coupled to different spatial parts with possibly different photon energy-dependent cross-sections. Therefore, such a change in the spin polarization, even for the same light polarization, is in general conceivable46,47. A dependence of the photoelectron spin polarization on photon energy has, for instance, been predicted for layered spin–orbital textures and certain geometries27,48, and was also shown in the case of circularly polarized light36. A complete switch of the spin polarization has on the other hand not been experimentally established.
Our polarization-dependent measurements establish the concept of orbital-selective spin textures in 2D momentum space in non-topological Rashba-split electron systems. This is important for possible opto-spintronic applications and from a conceptual point of view26,43. It is also of particular relevance in the context of other materials where spin and orbital textures and their momentum-dependent coupling are currently widely discussed, such as topological crystalline insulators49, transition metal dichalcogenides50,51 and transition metal oxides52, with importance, for example, for electron scattering and optical excitation phenomena. In particular, in the case of giant Rashba semiconductors the orbital dependence may open additional possibilities to modify the spin textures, for example, through photoexcitation as shown in the present work.
Furthermore, the observation of opposite spin chiralities for the conduction and valence band electrons in BiTeI opens pathways to manipulate the spin polarization through choice of the charge carrier type. In particular, in BiTeI and related polar semiconductors this can be realized via different surface terminations and thus through control of electrostatic fields at the surface or interface18. Interestingly, lateral p–n junctions, recently imaged in BiTeI by scanning tunnelling microscopy29, could therefore provide the opportunity to not only switch the carrier type but also the spin chirality at the Fermi level. In general, the band- and orbital-selective spin textures reported here for BiTeI provide degrees of freedom to control spin-polarized electronic states in polar semiconductors.
The spin-resolved angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy experiments were performed using a spin-resolving momentum microscope, which is able to simultaneously capture the complete 2D momentum space22. An additional imaging spin filter installed behind the k-resolving optics exploits the spin-selective mirror-like reflection of the photoelectrons at a gold passivated iridium surface20 to measure the y-component of the photoelectron spin polarization. A non-monochromatized He-discharge lamp (21.2 eV) and the fourth harmonic of a Ti:Sa (6 eV) oscillator served as light sources. The measurement geometry is shown in Fig. 1c, where Θ=30° and φ=22° for the He-light source and Θ=0° and φ=8° for the Ti:Sa oscillator. The energy resolution in the spin-resolved momentum maps was set to 80 meV for measurements with the He light source (Fig. 2) and 20 meV for the laser light source (Fig. 3). All experiments were performed at T=130 K and at pressures of the order of p=10−10 mbar. The spin-resolved data were processed as described in refs 22, 21. Single crystals of BiTeI were prepared by in situ cleaving with adhesive tape at pressures below 10−9 mbar. The samples have been grown by a modified Bridgman method with rotating heat field as described in refs 28, 53.
For electronic band structure calculations, we employed DFT with the generalized gradient approximation54 for the exchange correlation potential as implemented in the Vienna Ab Initio Simulation Package55,56. The interaction between the ion cores and valence electrons was described by the projector augmented-wave method57,58. The Hamiltonian contained the scalar relativistic corrections and the spin–orbit coupling was taken into account by the second variation method. For the simulation of the BiTeI surfaces, we used 24 atomic layer slabs that were terminated on one side by a monolayer of hydrogen to clearly separate the surface states localized on opposite sides of the slab.
How to cite this article: Maaß, H. et al. Spin-texture inversion in the giant Rashba semiconductor BiTeI. Nat. Commun. 7:11621 doi: 10.1038/ncomms11621 (2016).
This work was supported by DFG (through SFB 1170 ‘ToCoTronics’) and through FOR1162 (P3). We acknowledge the support by the Basque Departamento de Educacion, UPV/EHU (Grant Number IT-756-13), Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (MINECO Grant Number FIS2013-48286-C2-2-P), Tomsk State University Academic D.I. Mendeleev Fund Program in 2015 (Research Grant Number 8.1.05.2015), the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (Grant Numbers 15-02-01797 and 15-02-589 02717). Partial support by the Saint Petersburg State University (Grant Number 188.8.131.525) is also acknowledged.