Real-time imaging of glutamate clearance reveals normal striatal uptake in Huntington disease mouse models


It has become well accepted that Huntington disease (HD) is associated with impaired glutamate uptake, resulting in a prolonged time-course of extracellular glutamate that contributes to excitotoxicity. However, the data supporting this view come largely from work in synaptosomes, which may overrepresent nerve-terminal uptake over astrocytic uptake. Here, we quantify real-time glutamate dynamics in HD mouse models by high-speed imaging of an intensity-based glutamate-sensing fluorescent reporter (iGluSnFR) and electrophysiological recordings of synaptically activated transporter currents in astrocytes. These techniques reveal a disconnect between the results obtained in synaptosomes and those in situ. Exogenous glutamate uptake is impaired in synaptosomes, whereas real-time measures of glutamate clearance in the HD striatum are normal or even accelerated, particularly in the aggressive R6/2 model. Our results highlight the importance of quantifying glutamate dynamics under endogenous release conditions, and suggest that the widely cited uptake impairment in HD does not contribute to pathogenesis.


Glutamate transporters are responsible for the rapid uptake of extracellular glutamate following synaptic release. This ensures a low basal level of extracellular glutamate necessary to achieve a high signal-to-noise ratio during neurotransmission, and prevents overactivation of neuronal glutamate receptors that can promote cell-death signalling1. Various lines of evidence, notably from biochemical uptake assays in synaptosomal preparations, have suggested that several neurological conditions are characterized by impaired transporter-mediated glutamate uptake. This reduced capacity of synaptosomes to take up exogenous glutamate has been extrapolated to indicate a prolonged temporal profile of extracellular glutamate following synaptic release, thereby enhancing neuronal susceptibility to excitotoxic cell death2,3,4,5,6,7,8. As a result, the enhancement of transporter-mediated uptake is understood to be a viable therapeutic approach for a number of conditions, particularly Huntington disease (HD).

HD is a neurodegenerative disorder caused by a CAG repeat expansion in the gene encoding the huntingtin protein9. This mutation gives rise to a clinical triad of motor, cognitive and psychiatric symptoms as well as progressive brain atrophy that is particularly striking in the striatum. Huntingtin interacts with hundreds of proteins10, and the mutant protein has been implicated in altered protein and organelle trafficking, changes in cellular metabolism, disrupted mitochondrial function and calcium homeostasis, transcriptional dysregulation and synaptic dysfunction11. In addition, the earliest animal models of HD relied on intrastriatal injections of glutamate receptor agonists12,13, and evidence indicates that striatal neurons show increased susceptibility to glutamate-mediated excitotoxicity in early HD14. Several studies demonstrate a reduced uptake capacity when HD striatal tissue is exposed to exogenous glutamate or aspartate on a timescale of minutes (see Table 1 for references). These data have promulgated the view that glutamate uptake, particularly astrocytic uptake mediated by glutamate transporter-1 (GLT-1), is impaired in HD, resulting in extracellular glutamate build-up and excitotoxic signalling15,16,17,18,19,20. However, emerging data convincingly demonstrate that the uptake of externally supplied substrate in the brains slices and synaptosomal preparations largely occurs in the nerve terminals rather than in astrocytes21,22. This is an important finding, as a much higher density of uptake sites is found on astrocytes than on neurons1,22 and, accordingly, there appears to be a much greater physiological role of astrocytic uptake in comparison with nerve terminal uptake21. Together, these data highlight the need to revisit the well-accepted view of an uptake impairment in HD, as no study to date has tested whether the HD mutation influences the time course of extracellular glutamate following synaptic release.

Table 1 GLT-1 expression/function in HD.

Here, we use a rapid, intensity-based glutamate-sensing fluorescent reporter (iGluSnFR)23 to visualize the spatiotemporal dynamics of extracellular glutamate in the HD striatum following evoked synaptic release. By virally expressing iGluSnFR under the control of a neuronal promoter, we demonstrate that striatal neurons in HD are not exposed to a prolonged time course of extracellular glutamate following synaptic release, despite a significant reduction in 3H-labelled glutamate uptake in HD striatal synaptosomes as quantified by a standard biochemical assay. Surprisingly, endogenous glutamate clearance in the brain slices, as measured both by high-speed iGluSnFR imaging and electrophysiological measures of transporter-mediated currents recorded from striatal astrocytes, is consistently accelerated in the well-characterized aggressive R6/2 mouse model of HD. Our data suggest that biochemical measurements of exogenous glutamate uptake capacity do not necessarily correlate with glutamate clearance dynamics in situ, and highlight the need to re-evaluate our views on the contribution of, and therapeutic potential of targeting, glutamate transporters in disease.


Using iGluSnFR to quantify endogenous glutamate clearance

Slow glutamate clearance as a result of dysfunctional transporter-mediated uptake has been associated with neuronal cell death in disease via pathogenic activation of ionotropic glutamate receptors located on neurons. For this reason, we were interested in quantifying the temporal dynamics of glutamate sensed at the surface of striatal neurons (Fig. 1a) in mouse models of HD. iGluSnFR was expressed under the control of the synapsin promoter by viral delivery (AAV2/1-synapsin-iGluSnFR) into the dorsal striatum. Glutamate release was evoked in acute brain slices by local placement of a tungsten stimulating electrode in the dorsal striatum (Fig. 1b), and widefield iGluSnFR responses were imaged at 150 Hz (6.67 ms frame-rate) with a CCD camera. Rapid iGluSnFR responses, quantified within a 4 × 4 pixel region localized to the maximal response site, were readily observed under a variety of stimulation conditions, including brief bursts of ≥2 pulses at 100 μA or a single pulse at ≥200 μA (Fig. 1c). A typical response to a longer high-frequency stimulation (HFS) protocol consisting of 50 pulses at 100 Hz is shown in Fig. 1d. Single pulses at 100 μA were generally too weak to reliably elicit a detectable response.

Figure 1: Characterization of iGluSnFR responses in the dorsal striatum evoked by electrical stimulation.

(a) Simplified schematic depicting the basic spatial organization of a glutamatergic synapse in the striatum. For the majority of the experiments in the present study, iGluSnFR was expressed exclusively on neurons to measure the relative time course of extracellular glutamate sensed by these neurons. Glutamate uptake can occur through glutamate transporter-1 (GLT-1) and glutamate-aspartate transporter (GLAST), located predominantly on astrocytes, or through excitatory amino acid carrier 1 (EAAC1), located predominantly on neurons34. (b) Typical experimental setup showing the extent of iGluSnFR expression in the striatum (shown in green on the right) and the approximate placement of the stimulating electrode to evoke local glutamate release (arrow). Expression was generally strong along entire dorsal striatum immediately ventral to the corpus callosum. (c,d) Representative heat-maps showing specific frames of representative iGluSnFR responses following a single stimulus at 200 μA (c) or 50 pulses at 100 Hz (200 μA; d). The red-bordered frame in d is a magnified view of the panel immediately above it, with a 4 × 4 black box drawn to depict the region of interest corresponding to the region of maximal iGluSnFR signal that was used for quantification. (e) Grouped data (±s.e.m.) demonstrating the effect of dihydrokainic acid (DHK; 25 μM for 10 min) on iGluSnFR decay tau. Each response was normalized (norm) to its peak to emphasize the slowing effect DHK has on iGluSnFR decay. DHK had no significant effect on response size (before DHK: 4.6±1.7%ΔF/F; after DHK: 4.4±1.9%ΔF/F, n=5, P=0.81, paired t-test). (f) Paired values for the experiments in e. In all the cases, 25 μM DHK resulted in a robust increase in iGluSnFR decay time (paired t-test). (g) Grouped data showing that iGluSnFR responses, even following high-frequency stimulation (50 pulses, 100 Hz, 200 μA), were completely blocked by tetrodotoxin (TTX). TTX is shown in red, untreated (Un) is shown in black. Scale bar, 1 mm in b and applies to all square panels in b,c and d.

To assess the sensitivity of iGluSnFR to an impairment in transporter-mediated uptake, we bath applied a low concentration (25 μM; 10 min) of the GLT-1-specific inhibitor dihydrokainic acid (DHK). This resulted in a significant increase in the decay tau of evoked iGluSnFR responses (Fig. 1e,f), demonstrating the ability to detect relative changes in the temporal profile of extracellular glutamate with this experimental approach. All evoked responses were absent in the presence of TTX (1 μM; Fig. 1g, n=4), even when the slices were challenged with a HFS protocol (50 pulses, 100 Hz, 200 μA), indicating the action potential-dependent nature of the evoked signals. Despite resulting in larger peaks, increasing the number of pulses or the pulse intensity did not enhance the proportional spread of iGluSnFR signals from the central point of maximal release (Supplementary Fig. 2a–f), suggesting that the iGluSnFR response radius is unlikely to represent glutamate diffusion originating from the area of maximal release. Furthermore, the rise and decay kinetics of iGluSnFR responses were found to be nearly identical regardless of whether the 4 × 4 region of interest (ROI) was placed in the region of maximal glutamate release or 500 μm away from this central release site (Supplementary Fig. 2g,h), suggesting that electrical stimulation evokes a wide radius of simultaneous glutamate release in this preparation, at least as detected by the 6.67 ms frame-rate used here. Thus, all the future analyses were restricted to the central region of release adjacent to the stimulating electrode to optimize the signal-to-noise ratio.

In situ glutamate clearance in YAC128 mice

Numerous groups have demonstrated a reduction in GLT-1 mRNA and/or protein expression that associates with a significant reduction in glutamate uptake capacity in striatal tissue from HD mouse models (Table 1). For example, biochemical quantification of exogenous 3H-glutamate uptake in striatal synaptosomes from YAC128 mice expressing full-length human mutant huntingtin demonstrates a significant deficit in GLT-1-mediated uptake at 3 months of age17, and we report here that this effect is also robust when measured in striatal synaptosomes isolated from 1-month-old YAC128 mice (FVB/N: 35.1±4.3 nmol per mg per min, YAC128: 16.3±5.1 nmol per mg per min, n=6, P<0.0001, paired t-test; Table 1). To determine whether these biochemical findings translate to a prolonged time course of extracellular glutamate following endogenous release, we examined evoked iGluSnFR responses in the striatum from wild-type (WT; FVB/N) and age-matched YAC128 mice, before the onset of an overt motor phenotype (Supplementary Table 1). For these experiments, iGluSnFR was expressed under the control of the synapsin promoter to quantify relative differences in glutamate dynamics sensed at the extracellular surface of striatal neurons. iGluSnFR surface expression was not affected by the presence of mutant huntingtin (Supplementary Fig. 3a–c), and acute brain slices from WT and YAC128 mice responded similarly to known concentrations of exogenous glutamate (Supplementary Fig. 3d), demonstrating that sensor expression, membrane insertion and response to glutamate was not different between genotypes.

Contrary to our hypothesis, iGluSnFR response profiles were strikingly similar between genotypes when glutamate release was evoked by a variety of stimulation conditions at room temperature, including a HFS challenge (Fig. 2a–i). As both glutamate clearance and iGluSnFR dissociation kinetics are likely temperature dependent (Supplementary Fig. 4), we repeated the HFS experiment in slices perfused with ACSF clamped at a near-physiological temperature that also maintains optimal slice health (32±1 °C). Under such conditions, iGluSnFR fluorescence decayed faster in YAC128 striatum (Fig. 2j,l) despite larger peak amplitudes (Fig. 2k). Thus, we are able to detect a robust glutamate uptake deficit in YAC128 striatum through the use of a standard biochemical assay, yet we observe no evidence of slower extracellular glutamate clearance associated with neurotransmission.

Figure 2: Glutamate clearance in situ is not impaired in YAC128 dorsal striatum at 2 months of age.

(a) Grouped data showing the average iGluSnFR response (±s.e.m.) to a single pulse (200 μA) in the dorsal striatum from both WT (FVB/N) and age-matched YAC128 mice. The responses are normalized (norm) to their peaks to simplify comparisons of decay kinetics. (b,c) Bar graphs showing iGluSnFR response amplitude (b; WT n=12, 9, 9 from left to right; YAC128 n=14, 12, 12 from left to right, two-way ANOVA) and decay time (c; WT n=9 per bar; YAC128 n=12 per bar, RM two-way ANOVA) evoked by single pulses at increasing intensities. Response size but not decay is dependent on the pulse intensity (PI). No genotype differences are seen in either peak or decay. The responses were barely detectable following a single pulse at 100 μA and therefore no decay tau was calculated for this condition. (d) Average-normalized iGluSnFR response to a paired-pulse stimulation in the dorsal striatum from both WT (FVB/N) and age-matched YAC128 mice. (e,f) Bar graphs showing iGluSnFR response amplitude (e) and decay time (f) in response to paired pulses at decreasing inter-pulse intervals (IPI; WT n=12 per bar; YAC128 n=14 per bar). The response size but not decay is dependent on IPI (RM two-way ANOVA). No genotype differences are seen in either peak or decay (RM two-way ANOVA). (g) Average iGluSnFR response at room temperature (RT) to a high-frequency stimulation (HFS) consisting of 50 pulses over 500 ms. The responses are normalized to their value at the end of stimulation to simplify comparisons of the decay time course. (h,i) Bar graphs demonstrating no significant differences between WT (n=21) and YAC128 (n=17) for iGluSnFR amplitude (h) and decay (i) following HFS at RT. (jl) Same as gi, except that experiments were performed at 32 °C. Under these conditions, iGluSnFR responses from YAC128 striatum (n=11) were significantly larger (k) and decayed faster (l) in comparison with WT (n=13). An unpaired t-test was used for h,i,k and l.

As local stimulation within the striatum can evoke glutamate release from both cortical and thalamic terminals as well as promote the release of various local neuromodulators, we also imaged glutamate dynamics in the presence of extensive pharmacological blockade to rule out any potential effects of neuromodulator release. The blockade of dopaminergic, cholinergic, GABAergic and metabotropic glutamatergic signalling, combined with competitive antagonism of AMPA and NMDA ionotropic glutamate receptors, had no effect on iGluSnFR decay curves (0.3±5.29% change in decay tau (τ) from the pre-treatment value, n=4 slices from two mice, P=0.93, paired t-test). This suggests that local stimulation does not interfere with measurements of iGluSnFR decay as a result of neuromodulator release. As competitive antagonism of AMPA and NMDA receptors did not accelerate iGluSnFR decay, it is also unlikely that glutamate buffering by ionotropic glutamate receptors interferes with measures of iGluSnFR decay.

Previous studies highlight GLT-1 as the defective transporter in HD (see Table 1 for references) and many biochemical assays, including ours, measure the GLT-1-sensitive component of uptake through the use of DHK. Therefore, it is possible that we were unable to see an impairment in the overall glutamate clearance in YAC128 striatum as a result of compensation by non GLT-1 transporters, including GLAST or EAAC1 (ref. 24). To assess the contribution of GLT-1 to total glutamate clearance, we evoked glutamate release as above, and measured iGluSnFR fluorescence decay in the absence and then presence of increasing concentrations of DHK. We found that 500 μM DHK did not influence the decay tau following the application of 250 μM DHK; therefore, 250 μM was used as a saturating concentration. As expected, DHK increased the decay tau of iGluSnFR signals in both WT (FVB/N) and YAC128 striatum (Fig. 3a–c). However, the relative increase in iGluSnFR decay tau was similar for both the genotypes, suggestive of a similar GLT-1-mediated role in glutamate clearance. When the non-selective glutamate transporter inhibitor threo-β-benzyloxyaspartic acid (TBOA; 100 μM, ref. 25) was bath applied for 10 min to block all transporters, we observed a much larger increase in the decay tau in comparison with GLT-1-specific blockade. Again this effect was similar for both genotypes (Fig. 3a,d). Background fluorescence also increased in response to transporter blockade, likely the consequence of an increase in ambient extracellular glutamate26, and occurred equally in both genotypes (Supplementary Fig. 5a). Thus, when measuring the extracellular glutamate dynamics in a system with preserved synaptic structure, we see no evidence supporting an impairment of transporter-mediated glutamate uptake in the HD striatum.

Figure 3: Pharmacological inhibition of GLT-1 reveals no impairment of GLT-1-mediated glutamate clearance in 2-month-old YAC128 striatum.

(a) Bar graph showing the fold-increase in iGluSnFR decay tau following a 10-min bath application of the GLT-1-specific blocker dihydrokainic acid (DHK; 25, 100 and 250 μM) or the non-selective glutamate transporter inhibitor threo-β-benzyloxyaspartic acid (TBOA; 100 μM). Responses were evoked by a single pulse (200 μA) and are normalized to the genotype average in baseline (untreated) conditions. (bd) Average responses (±s.e.m.) for WT (black) and YAC128 (red) in baseline conditions (b) and after 250 μM DHK (c) and 100 μM TBOA (d). The responses are normalized (norm) to their peaks to simplify comparisons of decay kinetics. WT n=5; YAC128 n=5; RM two-way ANOVA.

As it is possible that the temporal profiles within the microenvironments immediately adjacent to the neuronal and astrocytic surface membranes may differ, we also repeated some experiments in 2-month-old WT (FVB/N) and YAC128 mice injected with iGluSnFR under the control of the astrocyte-specific GFAP promoter. For these experiments, the mice were injected intrastriatally with AAV2/1-GFAP-iGluSnFR, and the experiments were carried out as before. Again, we saw no evidence of impaired glutamate clearance following synaptic release evoked by single pulses or by HFS trains (50 pulses, 100 Hz, 200 μA; Supplementary Fig. 6a–d). As observed for synapsin-iGluSnFR, the application of DHK and TBOA failed to reveal a genotype difference in the GLT-1 and non GLT-1-mediated components of glutamate clearance (Supplementary Fig. 6e), and again, no differences in the DHK- or TBOA-induced increases in background fluorescence were observed (Supplementary Fig. 5b). We also noted a lack of correlation between the response peak and decay tau within a given stimulation paradigm (Supplementary Fig. 6f,g), suggesting that our results were not influenced by the magnitude of glutamate release.

It is possible that the previously reported uptake impairment in HD is progressive, with a greater dysfunction observed at later disease stages. Thus, we asked whether a slower clearance of synaptically released glutamate could be observed in YAC128 mice well after the onset of an overt motor phenotype27. To test this, we aged animals to approximately 14 months (Supplementary Table 1) before the intrastriatal injection of AAV2/1-synapsin-iGluSnFR. All the experiments from this group were performed at room temperature to ensure optimal slice viability from the aged animals. On a single pulse (200 and 300 μA), we saw no significant genotype differences in the response peak (200 μA; WT: 6.4±2.5%ΔF/F, YAC128: 6.3±2.7%ΔF/F; 300 μA; WT: 9.1±3.1%ΔF/F, YAC128: 9.0±3.6%ΔF/F, WT n=9, YAC128 n=8, P=0.96, repeated-measures (RM) two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)). However, in stark contrast to our original hypothesis, we observed a small but significant acceleration of iGluSnFR decay following single pulses (Fig. 4a,b). When slices were challenged with HFS (50 pulses, 100 Hz, 200 μA), there was a clear reduction in the peak response from YAC128 slices (Fig. 4c), in agreement with a loss of excitatory synapses and a reduction in glutamate release in late-stage HD striatum28,29. Although there was no significant difference in the decay tau between the two genotypes under these conditions (Fig. 4d), there was a decrease in the area under the curve of evoked iGluSnFR responses (Fig. 4e), suggesting that the total amount of glutamate sensed at the surface of neurons is lower in aged YAC128 mice. As with our experiments in younger YAC128 mice, we observed no evidence to support a deficit in glutamate clearance.

Figure 4: Striatal neurons are exposed to lower levels of synaptically released glutamate in 15-month-old YAC128 mice.

(a) Grouped data showing the average iGluSnFR response (±s.e.m.) to a single pulse (200 μA) in the dorsal striatum from WT (FVB/N; black) and age-matched, YAC128 (red) mice. Responses are normalized (norm) to their peaks for direct comparisons of decay time course. (b) Bar graph showing iGluSnFR decay in response to single pulses at different pulse intensities (PI; WT n=9 per bar; YAC128 n=8 per bar; RM two-way ANOVA). (c) Average iGluSnFR response to a high-frequency stimulation (HFS) consisting of 50 pulses over 500 ms (200 μA). The raw data are shown to highlight the dramatic difference in the response size between WT (n=20) and YAC128 (n=21) under these conditions. (d) Bar graph showing the decay tau from the experiments in c (unpaired t-test). (e) Bar graph showing the area under the curve (AUC) from the experiments shown in c (unpaired t-test).

In situ glutamate clearance in R6/2 HD mice

Biochemical quantification of glutamate uptake in synaptosomes as well as no-net-flux microdialysis experiments have also strongly suggested an uptake impairment in the R6/2 mouse model of HD (Table 1). This transgenic model, which expresses a toxic amino (N)-terminal fragment of the mutant huntingtin protein, is particularly aggressive and shows an HD-like phenotype starting as early as 1 month of age30. To assess the extracellular glutamate clearance following synaptic release in this model of HD, we injected 4–5-week-old R6/2 and age-matched WT (B6CBAF1/J) mice with AAV2/1-synapsin-iGluSnFR and imaged evoked responses 5–6 weeks later when they were approximately 10 weeks of age (Supplementary Table 1). To help ensure that we were not missing any potential genotype difference based on our stimulus parameters, we conducted a more extensive input–output profile of evoked iGluSnFR responses by varying both the stimulus number (at 100 Hz) and the intensity of a single pulse (Fig. 5a–c). Consistent with the loss of excitatory inputs to the striatum in this model31,32, iGluSnFR responses were generally smaller in the R6/2 mice (Fig. 5f). In both the genotypes, iGluSnFR peaks were dependent on both the stimulus intensity and the number of stimuli, whereas the decay was dependent on the number of stimuli but not the intensity (Fig. 5d–g). As we saw some evidence for in YAC128 mice, iGluSnFR decay taus were found to be significantly faster in R6/2 mice (Fig. 5e,g). This effect cannot be explained by the reduced response sizes in R6/2 mice as there was no significant correlation between peak and decay within a constant stimulation condition (Fig. 5h,i). This effect is also not explained by differences in iGluSnFR expression as there was no correlation between expression level and decay kinetics (Supplementary Fig. 7). We also observed no significant genotype difference in the decay of iGluSnFR intensity with increasing distance from the central region of maximal release (Supplementary Fig. 8).

Figure 5: Extracellular glutamate clearance is accelerated in the R6/2 model of HD at 10 weeks of age.

(ac) Grouped data showing the average iGluSnFR response (±s.e.m.) to 5 (a), 10 (b) and 50 (c) pulses (100 Hz, 100 μA) in the dorsal striatum from 2-month-old WT (B6CBAF1/J; black) and age-matched, R6/2 (red) mice. The responses are normalized (norm) to their peaks to simplify comparisons of decay time course. (d,e) Bar graphs of response size (d) and decay (e) to single pulses of varying pulse intensities (PI). WT n=16 per bar, R6/2 n=11, 12, 12 for 100, 200, 300 μA, respectively, two-way ANOVA. (f,g) Bar graphs of response size (f) and decay (g) to an increasing number of pulses with 10 ms interpulse intervals. WT n=15, 15, 16, 16, 16 for 1, 2, 5, 10, 50 pulses, respectively, R6/2 n=11 per bar, two-way ANOVA; **P<0.01 Bonferroni post hoc comparison. (h,i) Linear regression plots showing no correlation for either WT (black) or R6/2 (red) between iGluSnFR response size and decay tau following a single pulse at 200 μA (h; WT r2=0.011, P=0.575; R6/2 r2=0.059, P=0.264) or 50 pulses at 100 Hz (100 μA, i; WT r2=0.049, P=0.829, R6/2 r2=0.170, P=0.208). (j) Bar graph showing the fold-increase in iGluSnFR decay kinetics following a 10-min bath application of the GLT-1-specific blocker dihydrokainic acid (DHK; 250 μM) or the non-selective glutamate transporter inhibitor threo-β-benzyloxyaspartic acid (TBOA; 100 μM). The values are normalized to the genotype average in baseline (untreated) conditions. WT n=8 per bar; R6/2 n=6, 6, 5 from left to right; two-way ANOVA. **P<0.01 Bonferroni post hoc comparison.

When we assessed the relative contribution of GLT-1 and non-GLT-1-mediated uptake to the decay of iGluSnFR responses, we found that a saturating concentration of DHK (250 μM) increased the decay tau to the same extent in both genotypes. However, we observed a significantly larger increase in decay tau in the R6/2 mice upon addition of 100 μM TBOA to block all transporter-mediated uptake (Fig. 5j). The increases in basal fluorescence were not significantly different between the genotypes (Supplementary Fig. 5c). These pharmacological data suggest that the accelerated glutamate clearance observed under basal conditions in the R6/2 striatum may be a result of enhanced transporter-mediated uptake. As DHK alone affected both genotypes equally, we conclude that the enhanced uptake in R6/2 striatum is likely to be mediated by a transporter other than GLT-1.

The observed acceleration in synaptically evoked glutamate clearance in the R6/2 striatum was unexpected as it contrasts with the conclusions drawn from previous work and opposes general working models of the neurobiology of HD. Thus, we employed an additional technique that can be used to quantify relative changes in glutamate clearance in situ following synaptic release25. Glutamate uptake is electrogenic, and the associated cation current can be recorded from astrocytes using conventional whole-cell patch clamp techniques. We patched SR101-labelled astrocytes in the striatum from WT (B6CBAF1/J) and R6/2 mice at approximately 10 weeks of age; an age at which clear impairments in transporter-mediated glutamate uptake are detected by biochemical assays (Table 1). A passive response to both positive and negative current injections33 confirmed each recorded cell’s identity as an astrocyte (data not shown). Basic membrane properties recorded from both the genotypes are shown in Table 2. Glutamate release was evoked by a glass stimulating electrode placed 200–250 μm dorsal to the recorded astrocyte. Synaptically evoked transporter currents (STCs) were isolated by subtracting the evoked current in the presence of TBOA from that before TBOA application (Fig. 6a–c). Varying stimulation intensities were required to elicit a robust STC in each slice (see ‘Methods’ section), and there was no significant difference in peak amplitudes of the STCs evoked for each genotype (Fig. 6e). In agreement with our imaging data, we observed a significant acceleration of the decay of STCs recorded from R6/2 astrocytes compared with age-matched controls (Fig. 6d,f). The membrane resistance and capacitance were also found to be significantly different between the genotypes, although there was no significant correlation between either of these parameters and STC decay (r2=0.033, P=0.640 for membrane resistance and STC decay; r2=.0123, P=0.358 for membrane capacitance and STC decay), suggesting that the differences observed in STC decay cannot be accounted for by differences in these membrane properties.

Table 2 Membrane properties of astrocytes recorded from WT (B6CBAF1/J, n=9) and R6/2 (n=8) mice.
Figure 6: Synaptically activated currents decay faster in R6/2 astrocytes.

(a) Representative synaptically activated transporter current (STC) recorded in a striatal astrocyte, evoked by local electrical stimulation of glutamatergic afferents. The isolated STC (c) was obtained by subtracting the response in the presence of TBOA (100 μM, b) from that before TBOA application (a). Scale bars, 20 pA, 20 ms. (d) Average of all the isolated STCs recorded from WT (black, n=9) and R6/2 (red, n=8) astrocytes. The peaks are scaled for direct comparisons of the decay kinetics. Scale bar, 10 ms (e) Bar graph showing no difference in the average size of the isolated STCs (unpaired t-test). (f) Bar graph showing a significant reduction in the decay time of STCs recorded from R6/2 astrocytes (unpaired t-test).


On the basis of prior studies, a widely held view has emerged in the HD literature—that impaired glutamate uptake plays a key role in the associated neurodegeneration. Although glutamate clearance in HD had not been tested until now in the brain slice, with intact neuronal circuits and synapses, this view has rarely been questioned and is frequently mentioned in the literature as a key mechanism of disease pathogenesis. Here, we asked whether the clearance of synaptically released glutamate is slower in the HD striatum by using real-time, in situ measures of extracellular glutamate dynamics. To our surprise, we found no evidence of impaired glutamate uptake. In stark contrast, we observed a significant acceleration of glutamate clearance under certain experimental conditions, particularly in the R6/2 model of HD. Our data suggest that glutamate transporter dysfunction is not a major component of HD pathology and calls for a revision of our current model of synaptic dysfunction and contributors to excitotoxicity in this disease. Moreover, our results cast doubt on the potential use of glutamate uptake enhancement as a therapeutic strategy for the treatment of HD.

By far, the most common approach to quantify glutamate uptake in brain tissue is by liquid scintillation counting of radio-labelled glutamate or aspartate that is taken up by a synaptosomal preparation over a period of minutes. STC recording in situ has also been used to great effect; however, this technique is time consuming, technically demanding and is only routinely performed by a relatively small number of laboratories. The last few years have seen a rapid rise in the availability of optogenetic sensors, and with the introduction of iGluSnFR, a recent study has generated and characterized a sensitive and specific single-wavelength glutamate sensor with rapid on–off kinetics23. We show here that this sensor is highly sensitive to the relative differences in glutamate clearance capacity. The characteristics of iGluSnFR provide this approach with a number of advantages over standard biochemical uptake assays when quantifying the differences in glutamate clearance capacity. First, it allows for the comparison of glutamate dynamics in situ. Glutamate transporters are located on both neurons and glia and are generally found at a higher concentration near synaptic sites34,35. The rapid release from presynaptic terminals and reuptake by nearby transporters characterizes synaptic transmission, and both of these obligatory features are lost with biochemical uptake assays. Moreover, in synaptosomes, exogenous substrate appears to be predominantly taken up by GLT-1 located on the nerve terminals rather than astrocytes, despite the relatively negligible physiological importance of neuronal GLT-1 compared with astrocytic GLT-1 (refs 21, 22). These results question the precise physiological relevance of uptake assays that utilize exogenous glutamate or aspartate. Second, the time course of evoked iGluSnFR responses reflects not only transporter-mediated uptake but also diffusion, permitting an overall measure of glutamate clearance. Third, as a genetically encoded sensor, iGluSnFR expression can be driven under the control of a specific promoter. This allowed us to test a leading hypothesis in HD excitotoxicity by comparing the dynamics of glutamate sensed at the neuronal versus astrocytic extracellular surface.

On the other hand, imaging glutamate requires an exogenous glutamate binding site to be introduced into the brain, resulting in artificial competition with the natural time course of glutamate binding and unbinding to transporters and receptors. However, competitive glutamate receptor blockade did not alter the iGluSnFR decay time course, suggesting a negligible buffering effect by ionotropic glutamate receptors in these experiments. Thus, it is unlikely that the increase in surface NMDA receptors in the HD striatum36 influenced our measurements of iGluSnFR decay. There also appeared to be no significant correlation between iGluSnFR expression and decay tau, at least within the range of sensor expression located at the stimulation sites. Moreover, despite a significant difference in the magnitude of the glutamate decay time course measured by iGluSnFR imaging versus synaptically activated transporter currents recorded from astrocytes, relative differences in decay tau were preserved between the genotypes using the two methods.

In hindsight, perhaps the well-established notion of an uptake dysfunction in HD was unfounded. For example, a glutamate uptake impairment would be expected to increase the basal levels of extracellular glutamate in the striatum37,38, as demonstrated by the observed increase in basal (unstimulated) iGluSnFR intensity26 in response to glutamate transporter inhibition in the present study. However, this has not been reported in studies using microdialysis; in some cases, no differences in basal extracellular glutamate were detected in the R6/2 striatum16,18,39, while in others, a reduction was noted in both the R6/1 and R6/2 models of HD40,41. Furthermore, glutamate uptake blockade significantly slows the decay of NMDAR-mediated excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) recorded from the striatal spiny projection neurons, yet basal differences between the WT and YAC128 NMDAR EPSC decay kinetics are not readily detected36. Interestingly, EAAC1-mediated uptake is enhanced in a cellular model of HD42, consistent with our findings of accelerated uptake, which were particularly evident in the R6/2 model. Combined with the known reduction of functional excitatory synapses and release probability in late-stage HD43, it is likely that striatal neurons are exposed to less glutamate overall, particularly in late-stage HD. This is demonstrated here by the reduction in the area under the curve of iGluSnFR signals in aged HD mice. In sum, we conclude that while the biochemical data (see Table 1) may suggest an impairment in GLT-1-mediated uptake into nerve terminals21,22, our data clearly demonstrate that there is no deficit in the overall clearance of synaptically released glutamate in the HD striatum. There also appears to be no morphological evidence suggesting an impairment in extracellular glutamate diffusion; the number of tripartite synapses as well as the average synapse-to-astrocyte distance are similar in the WT and YAC128 striatum at 1 year of age36.

It was recently reported that depolarized astrocytes and poor extracellular potassium buffering are evident in late-stage HD mouse models, including the R6/2 mice44. It is known that astrocyte depolarization can impair transporter-mediated uptake45, which is opposite to our findings of enhanced glutamate clearance in the R6/2 striatum. Moreover, in the present study, we did not observe a significant difference in the resting membrane potential of striatal astrocytes recorded from the R6/2 mice at approximately 10 weeks of age, contrasting with this recent finding44. The reason for this discrepancy remains unclear, but may involve differences in the composition of the intra- and extracellular solutions. Nonetheless, our data regarding extracellular glutamate clearance in the HD mice were consistent regardless of whether we measured glutamate clearance with STC recordings, in which astrocytes are voltage clamped, or with iGluSnFR, in which astrocytes are left unperturbed.

If there is no uptake deficit in HD, then why would ceftriaxone, a beta-lactam antibiotic that increases GLT-1 expression, have a beneficial effect on the R6/2 HD phenotype18? One possibility is that increasing GLT-1 expression, even in the absence of an uptake deficit, would limit the activation of cell death-associated extrasynaptic NMDA receptors, which are upregulated in early-stage HD7,36. Another possibility, and one proposed by a recent study showing no exacerbation of the HD phenotype in the R6/2 mice that were also heterozygous for the gene encoding GLT-1 (ref. 46), is that ceftriaxone’s beneficial effect may be independent of GLT-1 expression and rather arise from its known effect on various cell-survival transcription factors47,48. From the point of view of a treatment for HD patients, enhancing uptake in the absence of a deficit is likely to result in unwanted side effects by interfering with physiological processes that depend upon glutamate spill-over49,50. Indeed, ceftriaxone has been shown to impair various forms of plasticity, as well as hippocampal-dependent learning, when administered to WT animals51,52. In light of these findings as well as those of the present study, we propose that a more effective therapeutic strategy for the prevention of excitotoxic cell death in HD may be to block extrasynaptic NMDA receptors or their downstream signalling7. Alternatively, studies providing insight into the precise mechanism of ceftriaxone’s protective effect in HD may uncover novel therapeutic avenues.

The data presented here oppose a well-accepted view of HD pathogenesis. We argue that the imaging and electrophysiological tools used here allow for a more physiologically relevant quantification of extracellular glutamate dynamics than previous measures of glutamate uptake in HD. On the basis of our findings, we propose that a deficit in glutamate clearance is unlikely to be a major contributor to excitotoxic cell death in HD and that therapeutic strategies should be revised, if necessary, as a result. We propose that excitotoxicity in HD is not a result of a double-edged sword consisting of the combination of elevated extrasynaptic NMDA receptors and impaired glutamate uptake. Despite the lack of a glutamate clearance deficit, robust extracellular glutamate signals, lasting for tens to hundreds of milliseconds, were indeed detected in both HD mouse models under a variety of physiologically relevant stimulation conditions, suggesting that extrasynaptic NMDA receptors do not require uptake impairments to become activated. Thus, these two different pathological mechanisms do not need to occur in tandem for a detrimental effect to ensue. On a broader scale, our data also demonstrate a lack of correlation between the results obtained from biochemical measures of glutamate uptake and real-time measurements of glutamate clearance in situ using optogenetic reporting and electrophysiology. The sensitivity of iGluSnFR to relative differences in glutamate clearance capacity suggests that this will prove to be an invaluable tool to the future study of glutamate transporters in both health and disease.



All the procedures were carried out in accordance with the Canadian Council on Animal Care and approved by the University of British Columbia Committee on Animal Care (Protocol A11-0012). The animals were housed on a 12 h:12 h light:dark cycle and had ad libitum access to standard lab chow and water. A total of 60 male mice were used in this study. The ages used for each set of experiments is summarized in Supplementary Table 1. Data from the YAC128 model were compared with age-matched control mice of the same background strain (FVB/N), while data from the R6/2 model were compared with their background strain, B6CBAF1/J. The FVB/N and YAC128 (line 55) mice were bred on site. The B6CBAF1/J (stock 100011) and R6/2 mice (stock 002810) were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory. In the manuscript, the term ‘wild-type’ (WT) is used to refer to control mice; either FVB/N (for comparisons with YAC128 mice) or B6CBAF1/J (for comparisons with R6/2 mice). A recent review provides a detailed description of the various mouse models of HD, including the YAC128 and R6/2 models53.

Virus injection and brain slice preparation

The mice were anaesthetized with isoflurane inhalation (2%) and maintained on 1.5% isoflurane for the duration of the surgical procedure. The body temperature was held constant at 37±1 °C with a heating pad. Then 1 μl of AAV2/1.hSyn.iGluSnFr.WPRE.SV40 or AAV2/1.GFAP.iGluSnFr.WPRE.SV40 (Penn Vector; provided by Dr Loren Looger, Janelia Farm Research Campus of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute) was injected into the dorsal striatum through a glass pipette attached to a Hamilton syringe and the injection rate was controlled over a 10-min period through the use of a micro-syringe pump (UMC4; World Precision Instruments). Stereotaxic co-ordinates with respect to Bregma were (in mm): 0.75 anterior, 2.0 lateral, 2.5 ventral. Approximately 1 month following the viral injections, the mice were anaesthetized with isoflurane, decapitated and the coronal brain slices (400 μm) containing the striatum were obtained as described previously54.

iGluSnFR imaging

The slices were transferred to a standard submerged recording chamber through which oxygenated ACSF54 (pH=7.3±0.1) was perfused at a flow rate of 2–3 ml per min at room temperature or at 32 °C±1 °C, as indicated. The ACSF consisted of (in mM): 125 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 25 NaHCO3, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 1 MgCl2, 2 CaCl2, 10 glucose. A 0.1 MΩ resistance monopolar tungsten stimulating electrode (Microprobes; tip diameter 2–3 μm) was positioned in the dorsal striatum at a depth of 50–100 μm, and electrical stimulation parameters were controlled by an A-M systems isolated pulse stimulator (Model 2100) and a World Precision Instruments stimulus isolator (A385). The stimulus duration was 0.1 ms. iGluSnFR fluorescence was excited by a 470 nm LED and visualized with a CCD camera (1M60, Pantera, Dalsa) coupled to a pair of back-to-back photographic lenses (50 mm, 1.4f; 135 mm, 2.8f) and a 530 nm bandpass filter. For each slice, the LED intensity was manually adjusted to generate a basal fluorescence level between 1,000 and 2,000 arbitrary units (12-bit scale). An 8 × 8 pixel binning was used to allow an image acquisition rate of 150 Hz (128 × 128 pixels per image). Clampex software was used to trigger LED activation and electrical stimulation, and images were acquired with XCAP software (EPIX, Inc.). For each experiment, the responses were evoked every 30 s for 7 min, with every third trial a blank trial without stimulation in order to enable subtraction of any bleaching artifact. In five randomly selected experiments from five different injections, 1,440 ms of LED exposure resulted in a 5.74±1.03%ΔF/F reduction in basal, unstimulated iGluSnFR fluorescence during that time period; all of which fully recovered before the start of the next trial 30 s later. The responses were averaged over the 10 stimulation trials and normalized to the basal fluorescence obtained from the five blank trials so that the LED-induced reduction in iGluSnFR intensity did not affect our measurements of decay kinetics in the evoked responses. The magnitude of all evoked iGluSnFR data are expressed as a percentage change in fluorescence above basal fluorescence and are denoted as %ΔF/F. Endogenous fluorescence55, was of little concern in the present study: a low-level fluorescence with kinetics much slower than that of iGluSnFR responses was observed only after prolonged HFS in the absence of TTX (50 pulses, 100 Hz, 200 μA; Supplementary Fig. 1) and not following single pulses or shorter bursts. Endogenous fluorescence was assessed by subjecting a brain slice from a non-iGluSnFR-injected FVB/N mouse to the same conditions as those used for iGluSnFR experiments.

To image iGluSnFR responses to exogenous glutamate, increasing concentrations of glutamate were supplied to the bath while iGluSnFR was illuminated with low LED intensity and imaged at 1 Hz. The glutamate was increased from (in μM) 0, 1, 10, 100, 300 to 1,000, and held ‘clamped’ at each concentration for a minimum of 5 min. To prevent ongoing uptake of the exogenous glutamate, 100 μM TBOA was co-applied throughout. To minimize excitotoxic damage and the effects of exogenous glutamate, TTX (1 μM), kynurenic acid (1 mM) and LY341495 (30 μM) were also bath applied throughout.

Primary neuronal co-cultures and immunofluorescence

Cortico-striatal co-cultures were prepared from E17–18 striatal and cortical tissues, as described previously54,56, although striatal neurons were not GFP-transfected on the day of plating in the present study. The cells were grown on poly-D-lysine-coated glass coverslips in 24-well plates with 1 ml of plating medium (Neurobasal medium, B27, glutamine and penicillin/streptomycin; Invitrogen) per well. On DIV4, 0.1 μl of the AAV2/1.hSyn.iGluSnFr.WPRE.SV40 virus (2.56 × 1013 GC per ml) was added to each well. On DIV7, the media were removed and replaced with 1 ml fresh plating media without virus, and subsequent half media changes occurred every 3 days thereafter. On DIV15-16, surface iGluSnFR was amplified by live staining with a chicken anti-GFP antibody (1:1,000; Abcam ab13970) for 10 min at 37 °C before fixation in 4% paraformaldehyde/sucrose for 10 min. Following fixation, the cells were washed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) before incubation with anti-chicken Alexa 568 secondary antibody (1:1,000; Invitrogen A11041, 1 h at room temperature). The cells were then washed and permeabilized with PBS containing 0.03% Triton X-100 (PBST). The coverslips were then exposed to a DARPP32 primary antibody (rabbit anti-DARPP32; #2306, Cell Signaling Technology; 1:1,000; dissolved in PBST containing 2% normal goat serum) for 1 h at room temperature to help identify the striatal spiny projection neurons ; morphological criteria were also used57. An AMCA-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibody was used to visualize DARPP32 (1:50; Jackson ImmunoResearch 711-155-152). The images were acquired with a Ziess Axiovert 200 M as described previously54. ImageJ was used to draw three ROIs around the dendrites for each DARRP-32-positive cell analysed. The average fluorescence intensity for the three ROIs for each of the red and green channels (representing surface and total iGluSnFR, respectively) was calculated and a ratio of surface:total staining was generated for each cell. The number of cells analysed is given as N, from three different batches each of YAC128 and WT co-cultures.

Visualizing iGluSnFR in single cells in fixed brain slice

To visualize iGluSnFR expression in single cells in vivo, we used a dilution strategy58 that avoids the high-density expression that we normally achieve with high titre iGluSnFR injections. We co-injected a mixture of diluted AAV2/1.hSyn.Cre.WPRE.hGH (1.46 × 109 GC per ml; Penn Vector Core) and Cre-dependent iGluSnFR virus (AAV2/1.hSyn.Flex.iGluSnFR.WPRE; Penn Vector; provided by Dr. Loren Looger, Janelia Farm Research Campus of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute). Approximately 3–4 weeks following the injection, the FVB/N and YAC128 mice were transcardially perfused with a 4% solution of paraformaldehyde in PBS. The perfused brains were post-fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 24 h, and then submerged in graded sucrose concentrations (24 h each at 10, 20 and 30% sucrose). The brains were embedded with O.C.T. compound (Sakura) and rapidly frozen in the bottom of the Cryomold, then sectioned at 18–20 μm on a cryostat (ThermoScientific Micron HM525) and submerged in PBS. The sections were then incubated in blocking solution (2.5% BSA, 0.1% Triton X-100, 0.02% sodium azide in PBS) for 45 min, followed by overnight 4 °C incubation in chicken anti-GFP primary antibody (1:500; Abcam ab13970) diluted in blocking solution. Following washing with PBST, the sections were incubated with anti-chicken Alexa488 secondary antibody (1:500 in blocking solution for 1 h at room temperature), washed and then slide-mounted with Fluoromount. The images were acquired with a Leica SP8 confocal microscope with a white light laser and hybrid photomultiplier detector with a × 63 oil immersion objective.


All the drugs were purchased from Tocris with the exception of tetrodotoxin (TTX), which was purchased from Affix Scientific. The cocktail of antagonists added to the ACSF for select experiments (described in the ‘Results’ section) were as follows: picrotoxin (100 μM), D-APV (50 μM), DNQX (10 μM), sulpiride (10 μM), SCH 23390 (4 μM), scopolamine (20 μM), hexamethonium bromide (100 μM), CGP 52432 (1 μM) and LY 341495 (3 μM). This cocktail of drugs was used to block GABAA, NMDA, AMPA, D2-like and D1-like dopamine, muscarinic and nicotinic acetylcholine, GABAB and metabotropic glutamate receptors, respectively. All the drugs, including transporter inhibitors DHK and TBOA, were bath applied for at least 10 min. The saturating effect of 250 μM DHK on GLT-1 inhibition was confirmed by a lack of further effect of 500 μM DHK on iGluSnFR decay time course (not shown).

iGluSnFR analysis

Evoked iGluSnFR responses were analysed in ImageJ by placing a 4 × 4 pixel (93.8 × 93.8 μm) ROI at the position where glutamate release was maximal, typically immediately adjacent to the stimulating electrode. All the quantifications, including peak fluorescence intensity, were obtained in ImageJ by averaging the iGluSnFR intensity within this 4 × 4 pixel region for each frame of a given response. When we quantified iGluSnFR dynamics outside of this central region of release, a 4 × 4 ROI was made 500 μm ventral to the region of greatest iGluSnFR peak intensity. All decay kinetics of evoked iGluSnFR responses were quantified through the use of a nonlinear regression single-exponential curve fit performed in GraphPad Prism. The curve fitting was applied from the peak of the response to the final frame of acquisition in all cases of single pulses and short bursts. For HFS trains consisting of 50 pulses at 100 Hz, curve fitting was applied immediately after stimulation offset until the end of acquisition. For presentation purposes in the figures, many traces were normalized to their peak value to allow for easier comparisons of the decay kinetics between groups; however, in such instances, all corresponding raw traces have also been provided as Supplementary Figs 9–13. To calculate the spread of iGluSnFR signals, all frames of a given response were z-projected as a single maximum intensity image and 585 μm (25 pixel) lines were drawn in the medial, lateral and ventral directions, originating from the pixel of highest intensity. iGluSnFR intensity values were calculated along the length of these lines in ImageJ and the resulting values were normalized to the pixel of greatest intensity. To measure iGluSnFR responses in WT and YAC128 striatal slices to exogenous glutamate, a ROI was drawn in the dorsal striatum around the extent of iGluSnFR expression and average pixel intensities within the ROI were calculated for each frame. For each glutamate concentration, the intensity values from a total of 11 frames, centred on the peak response for that concentration, were averaged and plotted. The data were calculated against the baseline value in the presence of TTX, TBOA, kynurenic acid and LY341495, before the addition of 1 μM glutamate.


The non-injected hemisphere from B6CBAF1/J controls or R6/2 HD mice was used for electrophysiological recordings. The slices were obtained as described above. After recovery, SR101 was added to the holding chamber for a minimum of 30 min to label astrocytes before transferring a hemisection to a recording chamber perfused with ACSF for 1–2 ml per min at a temperature of 32±1 °C. Astrocytes, identified by SR101 uptake, were patched with pipettes containing an intracellular solution that consisted of (in mM): 145 potassium gluconate, 1 MgCl2, 10 HEPES, 1 EGTA, 2 MgATP and 0.5 Na2GTP. Astrocytes at the surface of the slice were avoided in these experiments and only those deep in the tissue were targeted for STC recording. Upon successful break-in, the astrocyte phenotype was confirmed by their passive response to negative and positive current injection33. Synaptically activated transporter currents were evoked by single pulses through a glass stimulating electrode placed 150–200 μm dorsal to the recorded astrocyte. Responses were low-pass filtered at 1 kHz. From one slice to the next, the amount of current required to generate a measurable STC varied; thus, stimulus intensity was adjusted accordingly for each slice. The average current used to evoke an STC in these experiments did not differ between genotypes (WT: 362.5±60.3 μA, n=9; R6/2: 375.0±18.9 μA, n=8, P=0.85, t-test). An STC was evoked every 20 s. After establishing a baseline, TBOA (100 μM) was bath applied for 7–10 min. Pure STCs were isolated by subtracting the average of at least five responses in the presence of TBOA from that before TBOA. As astrocytes were prone to gradual increases in series resistance in our hands, we tolerated an increase in the series resistance up to a maximum of 35% from the baseline period to the time TBOA exerted its effect. Importantly, there was no genotype difference in the series resistance increase during this time (WT: 10.1±5.8%, n=9; R6/2: 19.1±3.6%, n=8, P=0.24, t-test).

Glutamate uptake assay

The glutamate uptake in synaptosomes from the brain tissue was measured as previously described17. The striatum was dissected from 1- and 3-month-old WT FVB/N and YAC128 mice and homogenized by mashing tissue in 1.4 ml ice-cold homogenizing buffer (5 mM Tris, 320 mM sucrose, 5 mM EDTA, 5 mM EGTA, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, protease inhibitors). The nuclei and debris were pelleted at 14,000g at 4 °C for 10 min. The pellet was vortexed and washed twice with 1 ml cold homogenizing buffer, then resuspended in 300 μl tissue buffer (5 mM Tris, 320 mM sucrose). The suspension was divided into three equal parts (100 μl each tube) and was washed with 1 ml cold tissue buffer and spun down at 14,000g at 4 °C for 10 min. The pellets in each tube were resuspended in 250 μl Na+-free Krebs buffer (120 mM choline chloride, 25 mM Tris, 5 mM KCl, 1 mM KH2PO4, 1 mM MgSO4, 10 g D-glucose, 2 mM CaCl2), Na+-plus Krebs buffer (120 mM NaCl, 25 mM Tris, 5 mM KCl, 1 mM KH2PO4, 1 mM MgSO4, 10 g D-glucose, 2 mM CaCl2) and DHK/Na+-plus Krebs buffer (500 μM DHK in Na+-plus Krebs buffer) respectively, as previously described (Rothstein et al., 1992). All the samples were pre-incubated for 10 min at 37 °C and returned onto cold ice. Each condition had duplicate tubes with 100 μl homogenate in each tube, and 50 μl was reserved for protein concentration determination. A 25 μl of 3H-labelled glutamate (PerkinElmer) mix (0.05 mM L-glutamate with 5μCi 3H glutamate in appropriate Krebs) was added to each sample (Na+- glutamate mix for Na+ plus samples, DHK-glutamate mix for DHK/Na+ plus samples and Na+-free glutamate mix for Na+-free samples). The samples were then incubated for 4 min in a 37 °C water bath. The uptake was stopped by quickly placing the tube back in iced water. The removal of the unincorporated radiolabelled glutamate was accomplished by centrifugation for 5 min at 10,000 r.p.m. The pellet was washed three times with 400 μl of cold-tissue buffer followed by centrifugation. Triton (0.8%) was added to the pellets. The radioactivity was assessed by performing a liquid scintillation count, and protein concentration was determined by BCA protein assay kit.


All the data are presented as mean±s.e.m and normality was formally assessed in Graphpad prism. As all the data were determined to be normally distributed, parametric statistics were used throughout. The statistical tests used include: t-test, paired t-test, two-way ANOVA and RM two-way ANOVA. All the t-tests were performed as two-tailed t-tests. RM two-way ANOVA was only used when all the data within a data set for a given factor were paired. For data sets containing both paired and unpaired data, two-way ANOVA was used. The statistical test used for each experiment is stated in the text and/or corresponding figure legend. The P values <0.05 were considered significant. The reported n-values indicate the total number of experiments that were obtained from the number of mice indicated in Supplementary Table 1. For every data set, at least three mice were used per group, unless otherwise indicated. No statistical methods were used to pre-determine the sample sizes but our sample sizes are similar to those reported in previous publications54,59,60.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Parsons, M. P. et al. Real-time imaging of glutamate clearance reveals normal striatal uptake in huntington disease mouse models. Nat. Commun. 7:11251 doi: 10.1038/ncomms11251 (2016).


  1. 1

    Danbolt, N. C. Glutamate uptake. Prog. Neurobiol. 65, 1–105 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Paoletti, P., Bellone, C. & Zhou, Q. NMDA receptor subunit diversity: impact on receptor properties, synaptic plasticity and disease. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 14, 383–400 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Robinson, M. B. The family of sodium-dependent glutamate transporters: a focus on the GLT-1/EAAT2 subtype. Neurochem. Int. 33, 479–491 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Maragakis, N. J. & Rothstein, J. D. Mechanisms of disease: astrocytes in neurodegenerative disease. Nat. Clin. Pract. Neurol. 2, 679–689 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Seifert, G., Schilling, K. & Steinhauser, C. Astrocyte dysfunction in neurological disorders: a molecular perspective. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 7, 194–206 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Yi, J. H. & Hazell, A. S. Excitotoxic mechanisms and the role of astrocytic glutamate transporters in traumatic brain injury. Neurochem. Int. 48, 394–403 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Parsons, M. P. & Raymond, L. A. Extrasynaptic NMDA receptor involvement in central nervous system disorders. Neuron 82, 279–293 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Soni, N., Reddy, B. V. & Kumar, P. GLT-1 transporter: an effective pharmacological target for various neurological disorders. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 127, 70–81 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    A novel gene containing a trinucleotide repeat that is expanded and unstable on Huntington's disease chromosomes. The Huntington's Disease Collaborative Research Group. Cell 72, 971–983 (1993).

  10. 10

    Shirasaki, D. I. et al. Network organization of the huntingtin proteomic interactome in mammalian brain. Neuron 75, 41–57 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Zuccato, C., Valenza, M. & Cattaneo, E. Molecular mechanisms and potential therapeutical targets in Huntington's disease. Physiol. Rev. 90, 905–981 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Beal, M. F. et al. Replication of the neurochemical characteristics of Huntington's disease by quinolinic acid. Nature 321, 168–171 (1986).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Coyle, J. T. & Schwarcz, R. Lesion of striatal neurones with kainic acid provides a model for Huntington's chorea. Nature 263, 244–246 (1976).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Fan, M. M. & Raymond, L. A. N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor function and excitotoxicity in Huntington's disease. Prog. Neurobiol. 81, 272–293 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Lievens, J. C. et al. Impaired glutamate uptake in the R6 Huntington's disease transgenic mice. Neurobiol. Dis. 8, 807–821 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Behrens, P. F., Franz, P., Woodman, B., Lindenberg, K. S. & Landwehrmeyer, G. B. Impaired glutamate transport and glutamate-glutamine cycling: downstream effects of the Huntington mutation. Brain 125, 1908–1922 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Huang, K. et al. Palmitoylation and function of glial glutamate transporter-1 is reduced in the YAC128 mouse model of Huntington disease. Neurobiol. Dis. 40, 207–215 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Miller, B. R. et al. Up-regulation of GLT1 expression increases glutamate uptake and attenuates the Huntington's disease phenotype in the R6/2 mouse. Neuroscience 153, 329–337 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Shin, J. Y. et al. Expression of mutant huntingtin in glial cells contributes to neuronal excitotoxicity. J. Cell Biol. 171, 1001–1012 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Faideau, M. et al. In vivo expression of polyglutamine-expanded huntingtin by mouse striatal astrocytes impairs glutamate transport: a correlation with Huntington's disease subjects. Hum. Mol. Genet. 19, 3053–3067 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Petr, G. T. et al. Conditional deletion of the glutamate transporter GLT-1 reveals that astrocytic GLT-1 protects against fatal epilepsy while neuronal GLT-1 contributes significantly to glutamate uptake into synaptosomes. J. Neurosci. 35, 5187–5201 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Furness, D. N. et al. A quantitative assessment of glutamate uptake into hippocampal synaptic terminals and astrocytes: new insights into a neuronal role for excitatory amino acid transporter 2 (EAAT2). Neuroscience 157, 80–94 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Marvin, J. S. et al. An optimized fluorescent probe for visualizing glutamate neurotransmission. Nat. Methods 10, 162–170 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Salvatore, M. F., Davis, R. W., Arnold, J. C. & Chotibut, T. Transient striatal GLT-1 blockade increases EAAC1 expression, glutamate reuptake, and decreases tyrosine hydroxylase phosphorylation at ser(19). Exp. Neurol. 234, 428–436 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Diamond, J. S. Deriving the glutamate clearance time course from transporter currents in CA1 hippocampal astrocytes: transmitter uptake gets faster during development. J. Neurosci. 25, 2906–2916 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Haustein, M. D. et al. Conditions and constraints for astrocyte calcium signaling in the hippocampal mossy fiber pathway. Neuron 82, 413–429 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Slow, E. J. et al. Selective striatal neuronal loss in a YAC128 mouse model of Huntington disease. Hum. Mol. Genet. 12, 1555–1567 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Joshi, P. R. et al. Age-dependent alterations of corticostriatal activity in the YAC128 mouse model of Huntington disease. J. Neurosci. 29, 2414–2427 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Singaraja, R. R. et al. Altered palmitoylation and neuropathological deficits in mice lacking HIP14. Hum. Mol. Genet. 20, 3899–3909 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Stack, E. C. et al. Chronology of behavioral symptoms and neuropathological sequela in R6/2 Huntington's disease transgenic mice. J. Comp. Neurol. 490, 354–370 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Cepeda, C. et al. Transient and progressive electrophysiological alterations in the corticostriatal pathway in a mouse model of Huntington's disease. J. Neurosci. 23, 961–969 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Klapstein, G. J. et al. Electrophysiological and morphological changes in striatal spiny neurons in R6/2 Huntington's disease transgenic mice. J. Neurophysiol. 86, 2667–2677 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Bergles, D. E. & Jahr, C. E. Synaptic activation of glutamate transporters in hippocampal astrocytes. Neuron 19, 1297–1308 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Rothstein, J. D. et al. Localization of neuronal and glial glutamate transporters. Neuron 13, 713–725 (1994).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Chaudhry, F. A. et al. Glutamate transporters in glial plasma membranes: highly differentiated localizations revealed by quantitative ultrastructural immunocytochemistry. Neuron 15, 711–720 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Milnerwood, A. J. et al. Early increase in extrasynaptic NMDA receptor signaling and expression contributes to phenotype onset in Huntington's disease mice. Neuron 65, 178–190 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Rothstein, J. D. et al. Knockout of glutamate transporters reveals a major role for astroglial transport in excitotoxicity and clearance of glutamate. Neuron 16, 675–686 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Massieu, L., Morales-Villagran, A. & Tapia, R. Accumulation of extracellular glutamate by inhibition of its uptake is not sufficient for inducing neuronal damage: an in vivo microdialysis study. J. Neurochem. 64, 2262–2272 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Gianfriddo, M., Melani, A., Turchi, D., Giovannini, M. G. & Pedata, F. Adenosine and glutamate extracellular concentrations and mitogen-activated protein kinases in the striatum of Huntington transgenic mice. Selective antagonism of adenosine A2A receptors reduces transmitter outflow. Neurobiol. Dis. 17, 77–88 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    Nicniocaill, B., Haraldsson, B., Hansson, O., O'Connor, W. T. & Brundin, P. Altered striatal amino acid neurotransmitter release monitored using microdialysis in R6/1 Huntington transgenic mice. Eur. J. Neurosci. 13, 206–210 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41

    Traficante, A. et al. Reduced activity of cortico-striatal fibres in the R6/2 mouse model of Huntington's disease. Neuroreport 18, 1997–2000 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42

    Petr, G. T. et al. Glutamate transporter expression and function in a striatal neuronal model of Huntington's disease. Neurochem. Int. 62, 973–981 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43

    Raymond, L. A. et al. Pathophysiology of Huntington's disease: time-dependent alterations in synaptic and receptor function. Neuroscience 198, 252–273 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44

    Tong, X. et al. Astrocyte Kir4.1 ion channel deficits contribute to neuronal dysfunction in Huntington's disease model mice. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 694–703 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45

    Barbour, B., Brew, H. & Attwell, D. Electrogenic glutamate uptake in glial cells is activated by intracellular potassium. Nature 335, 433–435 (1988).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46

    Petr, G. T. et al. Decreased expression of GLT-1 in the R6/2 model of Huntington's disease does not worsen disease progression. Eur. J. Neurosci. 38, 2477–2490 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47

    Lee, S. G. et al. Mechanism of ceftriaxone induction of excitatory amino acid transporter-2 expression and glutamate uptake in primary human astrocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 13116–13123 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48

    Lewerenz, J. et al. Induction of Nrf2 and xCT are involved in the action of the neuroprotective antibiotic ceftriaxone in vitro. J. Neurochem. 111, 332–343 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49

    Mitchell, S. J. & Silver, R. A. Glutamate spillover suppresses inhibition by activating presynaptic mGluRs. Nature 404, 498–502 (2000).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50

    Liu, D. D., Yang, Q. & Li, S. T. Activation of extrasynaptic NMDA receptors induces LTD in rat hippocampal CA1 neurons. Brain Res. Bull. 93, 10–16 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51

    Omrani, A. et al. Up-regulation of GLT-1 severely impairs LTD at mossy fibre—CA3 synapses. J. Physiol. 587, 4575–4588 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52

    Matos-Ocasio, F., Hernandez-Lopez, A. & Thompson, K. J. Ceftriaxone, a GLT-1 transporter activator, disrupts hippocampal learning in rats. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 122, 118–121 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53

    Pouladi, M. A., Morton, A. J. & Hayden, M. R. Choosing an animal model for the study of Huntington's disease. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 14, 708–721 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54

    Parsons, M. P. et al. Bidirectional control of postsynaptic density-95 (PSD-95) clustering by Huntingtin. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 3518–3528 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55

    Shibuki, K. et al. Dynamic imaging of somatosensory cortical activity in the rat visualized by flavoprotein autofluorescence. J. Physiol. 549, 919–927 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56

    Milnerwood, A. J. et al. Mitigation of augmented extrasynaptic NMDAR signaling and apoptosis in cortico-striatal co-cultures from Huntington's disease mice. Neurobiol. Dis. 48, 40–51 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57

    Kolodziejczyk, K. & Raymond, L. A. Differential changes in thalamic and cortical excitatory synapses onto striatal spiny projection neurons in a Huntington disease mouse model. Neurobiol. Dis. 86, 62–74 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58

    Chen, T. W. et al. Ultrasensitive fluorescent proteins for imaging neuronal activity. Nature 499, 295–300 (2013).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59

    Kolodziejczyk, K., Parsons, M. P., Southwell, A. L., Hayden, M. R. & Raymond, L. A. Striatal synaptic dysfunction and hippocampal plasticity deficits in the hu97/18 mouse model of huntington disease. PLoS ONE 9, e94562 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60

    Plotkin, J. L. et al. Impaired TrkB receptor signaling underlies corticostriatal dysfunction in Huntington's disease. Neuron 83, 178–188 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR MOP-12699 and FDN-143210). M.P.P is a recipient of a CIHR postdoctoral fellowship and M.P.V. is a recipient of a Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research postdoctoral fellowship. We thank Pumin Wang, Jeffrey LeDue and Cindy Jiang for their excellent technical assistance.

Author information




M.P.P., M.P.V. and C.L.W. carried out all the imaging experiments, R.K. performed the biochemical uptake assay and generated the immunostaining data in primary neuronal cultures and images in the fixed brain slice. M.P.P. performed the electrophysiology. All the experiments were conceived by M.P.P., M.P.V., T.H.M. and L.A.R. M.P.P. analysed the data and wrote the manuscript with assistance from L.A.R. and edits from M.P.V. and T.H.M.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lynn A. Raymond.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures 1-13 and Supplementary Table 1. (PDF 914 kb)

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Parsons, M., Vanni, M., Woodard, C. et al. Real-time imaging of glutamate clearance reveals normal striatal uptake in Huntington disease mouse models. Nat Commun 7, 11251 (2016).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing