Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Quadrupolar and anisotropy effects on dephasing in two-electron spin qubits in GaAs


Understanding the decoherence of electron spins in semiconductors due to their interaction with nuclear spins is of fundamental interest as they realize the central spin model and of practical importance for using them as qubits. Interesting effects arise from the quadrupolar interaction of nuclear spins with electric field gradients, which have been shown to suppress diffusive nuclear spin dynamics and might thus enhance electron spin coherence. Here we show experimentally that for gate-defined GaAs quantum dots, quadrupolar broadening of the nuclear Larmor precession reduces electron spin coherence by causing faster decorrelation of transverse nuclear fields. However, this effect disappears for appropriate field directions. Furthermore, we observe an additional modulation of coherence attributed to an anisotropic electronic g-tensor. These results complete our understanding of dephasing in gated quantum dots and point to mitigation strategies. They may also help to unravel unexplained behaviour in self-assembled quantum dots and III–V nanowires.


Electron spin qubits in GaAs quantum dots have played a central role in demonstrating the key operations of semiconductor spin qubits1,2,3,4. A prominent and often dominant dephasing mechanism in these devices as well as other semiconductor spin qubits5,6 is the interaction of the electron spin with 104–106 nuclear spins of the host lattice. While the fundamentals of this interaction have been studied quite extensively7,8,9,10,11, and theory and experiments are in reasonable agreement12,13, the theory predicts a potential for much longer dephasing times14 than observed so far and it remains an open question as to what ultimately limits electron spin coherence. Remarkable progress has also been made in eliminating dephasing from nuclear spins using Si-based systems15 that can be isotopically purified, but this route is not open for III–V semiconductor systems, where all isotopes carry nuclear spin. Nevertheless, the latter remain of practical interest because of their lower effective mass, single conduction band valley and potential for optical coupling.

The role of quadrupolar coupling of nuclear spins with electric field gradients (EFGs) from charged impurities or strain has been investigated, both experimentally and theoretically16,17,18,19,20,21, mostly in self-assembled quantum dots, which exhibit large quadrupolar splittings due to strain intrinsic to their epitaxial growth. But its influence on electron spin coherence was unclear and it was first thought to enhance coherence due to quadrupolar suppression of nuclear spin flip-flops.

In contrast to this prediction, we find that Hahn echo coherence of our gate-defined quantum dots deteriorates when the magnetic field is rotated to maximize quadrupolar broadening of nuclear levels. This degradation of coherence is similar to very recent findings in self-assembled quantum dots22,23, although in our case, quadrupolar splittings arise from local electric fields rather than strain and are orders of magnitude weaker. In addition, we find a complex pattern of collapses and revivals of the echo signal unless the magnetic field is aligned with specific crystal axes, which we explain with an anisotropic g-tensor causing a coupling of the nuclear Larmor precession with the electron spin.


ST0 qubit

The qubit studied here is a two-electron spin qubit1,24, using the mz=0 subspace of the spin singlet S and spin triplet T0 of two-electron spins. These electrons are confined in a GaAs double quantum dot formed by electrostatic gating (Fig. 1a) of a two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG). The effects explored in this work apply equally to single electron spins.

Figure 1: Device layout and quadrupole broadening.

(a) Gates used for pulsed qubit control are depicted in blue; the energy of the conduction band edge ECB is shown on the left. (b) Nuclear spins 3/2 with magnetic moment μ in the proximity of the quantum dot experience quadrupolar coupling with electric field gradients Vxx induced by crystal distortion due to the electric field of the triangular quantum well. (c) While the centre transition, with splitting ω0, stays unchanged, the satellite transitions, distorted by the electron’s own charge, exhibit a quadrupolar shift by ωQ. (d) The resulting frequency distribution F(ω) consists of two Gaussians with different variances, one showing an excess quadrupolar broadening of δωQ. (e) Echo amplitude for magnetic fields along the [110] axis, showing oscillations with the relative Larmor frequencies of the three nuclear spins. A semi-classical model (solid line) is used to fit the data (dots, offset for clarity).

A random configuration of the nuclear spins introduces an effective magnetic field of a few mT, the Overhauser field, whose dynamics cause qubit dephasing. Hahn echo measurements that eliminate dephasing from slow fluctuations allow studying these dynamics, as they become the dominant dephasing mechanism.

We follow the experimental procedure from ref. 12 (see also Methods), implementing the required π-pulse to invert the state of the qubit halfway through the evolution time , using the exchange interaction between the two spins. Figure 1e shows the spin echo signals as a function of separation time for magnetic fields aligned along the [110] crystal axis. (Note that we experimentally cannot distinguish between the [110] and axes, but refer to the direction parallel to the dot connection line as the axis throughout the paper for ease of reading.) Similar results to refs 12, 25 are obtained, but with approximately a factor two shorter coherence times (Supplementary Note 1). At fields <500 mT, a second-order coupling with the oscillating, transverse nuclear field (that is, its component perpendicular to the external field) leads to periodic collapses and revivals of the echo amplitude10,11,12,13. Revivals occur at times corresponding to the periods of the relative Larmor precession of the three species 69Ga, 71Ga and 75As. The overall envelope decay can be modelled by assuming a phenomenological broadening δB of the nuclear Larmor frequencies. Because of this variation of the precession rates, the total transverse hyperfine field of each species decorrelates on the timescale of 1/δB. Due to the above-mentioned quadratic contribution of the transverse hyperfine field to the electronic Zeeman splitting, these fluctuations contribute to the dephasing of the electrons.

Quadrupolar interaction

While such a broadening is expected from dipolar interaction between the nuclei, fitting the current and earlier12 data requires a value of δB=1.4 and 0.3 mT, respectively, at least a factor three larger than the intrinsic dipolar nuclear linewidth of 0.1 mT obtained from NMR measurements in pure GaAs (ref. 26). More direct measurements of the nuclear dynamics based on correlation of rapid single-shot measurements27 are consistent with these values.

NMR experiments on GaAs samples with impurities as well as studies in single self-assembled quantum dots21,28 revealed a similar excess line broadening, which was found to depend on the field direction and explained by quadrupolar effects26,29. Strain as well as electric fields from charged impurities or the triangular quantum well, used here to confine electrons (Fig. 1a), distort the valence orbitals and crystal lattice, thus creating EFGs at the nuclear sites (Fig. 1b). These EFGs couple with the quadrupolar momentum of the nuclei with spin I=3/2 and (to lowest order) modify the splitting of the Iz=±3/2↔±1/2 satellite Larmor transitions by26

where Qα is the quadrupolar moment of nuclear species α, e the elementary charge and Vxx denotes the component of the EFG tensor in the direction of the external field (Fig. 1b,c). For in-plane fields as considered here, the relevant longitudinal local field gradient induced by an electric field is given by26 (Supplementary Note 2)

R14,α is the species-dependent response tensor component relating electric fields to EFGs at the nuclear site due to lattice and orbital distortions, θ is the angle between the magnetic field and the [110] axis and Ez is the electric field component in the z-direction. The angular dependence and the fact that only the z-component of the electric field contributes, arise from the crystal symmetry of the host material. Hence, the local electric field Ez and its variation across the electronic wavefunction due to the electron’s own charge density introduce a broadening of the precession frequencies. The dependence of ωQ,α on θ, implies a suppression of the effect for a field along the [100] and [010] axis.

The Hahn echo amplitude as a function of separation time is shown in Fig. 2 for different in-plane field directions θ between the [110] and the axes (Methods). Indeed, a factor two longer coherence is seen for θ=45°, parallel to the [100] (or [010]) direction. Apart from this enhancement, another oscillatory modulation appears, reaching a maximum at the same angle.

Figure 2: B-field direction dependence.

Echo amplitude at 300 mT as a function of separation time for different in-plane magnetic field directions θ, with 0° corresponding to the [110] direction. Curves are offset for clarity. At 45°, parallel to the crystallographic [100] axis, the coherence time is enhanced as quadrupolar couplings are suppressed. When rotating the field, a g-factor anisotropy leads to oscillations, associated with the three different nuclear Larmor frequencies. A semi-classical model (solid line) is used to fit the data (dots).

g-factor anisotropy

To further investigate the origin of these oscillations, we aligned Bext along the [100]-axis and varied its magnitude in Fig. 3. With decreasing Bext, the frequency of the modulation decreases, until at 100 mT only a very fast decay of the echo amplitude followed by a revival at ≈13 μs occurs. This envelope modulation can be explained by an electronic g-factor anisotropy, arising from an asymmetric confinement of the electron in the 2DEG and spin–orbit coupling30,31,32. The main axes of the g-tensor are expected to be the [110] and crystal axis, consistent with the absence of a fast echo modulation with B along these directions. For other field directions, the quantization axis of the electron differs from the external field around which the nuclear spins precess. A linear coupling with the transverse nuclear magnetic field thus appears in the effective magnetic field determining the electronic Zeeman splitting (Fig. 4a; Supplementary Fig. 1; Supplementary Note 3):

Figure 3: B-field magnitude dependence.

Echo amplitude for magnetic field magnitudes along the [100] axis. A g-factor anisotropy causing different quantization axes for electron and nuclei spins leads to oscillations with the three nuclear Larmor frequencies. For small magnetic fields, the echo signal is strongly suppressed in the first hundreds of nanoseconds, but revives at later times. A semi-classical model (solid line) is used to fit the data (dots).

Figure 4: g-factor anisotropy and fit parameters.

(a) Due to an anisotropic g-tensor electron and nuclear spins have different quantization axes, Beff and Bext, respectively. This leads to a linear contribution of the transverse Overhauser field to the electronic Zeeman splitting, oscillating with the Larmor frequencies of the nuclear spins. (b,c) Fit parameters extracted for different in-plane magnetic field directions θ. The quadrupolar contribution to nuclear broadening δBα=ħδωQ,α/γα, expressed in terms of an equivalent linewidth for the three isotopes using equation (1), vanishes at 45° along the [100] direction. At the same angle, the sin(2θ) dependence of the coupling g with the transverse hyperfine field reaches a maximum.

where denotes the (off-)diagonal entries of the g-tensor. During the free evolution part of the spin echo, the qubit acquires a phase arising from . Due to the dynamics of that phase is not eliminated by the echo pulse and hence leads to dephasing. But whenever the evolution time is a multiple of all three Larmor frequencies, the net phase accumulated vanishes and the echo amplitude recovers. Partial recovery occurs if the evolution time only matches a multiple of the Larmor period of two or one species.

Semi-classical fit model

To obtain a quantitative description of quadrupolar and anisotropy effects, we adapt the semi-classical model of ref. 12, based on computing the total electronic phase accumulated due to the precessing nuclear spins and averaging13 over the initial nuclear state. The transverse hyperfine field is modelled as the vector sum of Gaussian distributed contributions arising from the three nuclear species and the spread of quadrupolar shifts. The distribution of nuclear precession frequencies F(ω) is chosen such that the correlation function of the transverse field is that obtained from an ensemble of independent nuclear spins 3/2 subjected to a Gaussian distribution of quadrupolar shifts (Supplementary Note 4). F(ω) is taken as the weighted sum of two Gaussians centred on the Larmor frequency, reflecting the contributions from the unperturbed centre transition and the quadrupole broadened satellite transitions as schematically depicted in Fig. 1d. The root mean squared width of the quadrupolar broadened distribution is given by the variation of electric fields via equations (1) and (2).

Using this model, we fit the data (Figs 1, 2, 3) with most free parameters being independent of the magnetic field (Supplementary Note 4).

Most relevant for this work are the quadrupolar broadenings of nuclear transition and the linear coupling with transverse hyperfine fields g (both depending on field direction only) shown in Fig. 4b,c. As predicted, the quadrupolar broadening approximately vanishes at θ=45° and is maximal at θ=0° and θ=90°. The maximum magnitude of δBα is consistent with the electric field variation generated by the electron in the dot (Supplementary Note 4). The off-diagonal g-tensor element g shows the predicted sin(2θ) dependence, and its maximum anisotropy of 5% is comparable with that found in quantum wells31.


One of our key results is that quadrupole broadening of nuclear spins can contribute to electronic dephasing by increasing the nuclear linewidth and hence leading to faster decorrelation of the transverse nuclear polarization, which contributes to the electronic Zeeman splitting to second order. While in principle another source of anisotropy with the same angular dependence could explain the observed variation of the coherence time, we are not aware of any other plausible mechanism. Anisotropic diffusion33 shows a different angular dependence with the longest coherence times along the [110] direction. Our interpretation is further supported by the good quantitative agreement with the model and NMR measurements26,29. This result does not contradict the reported suppression of nuclear spin diffusion20 by quadrupole effects19 as spin diffusion mostly affects electron coherence via the longitudinal polarization, whereas in our case the transverse coupling is dominant. An isotropic g-factor in combination with an anisotropic hyperfine interaction would lead to the same echo modulation when rotating Bext, but the anisotropy of the hyperfine interaction is usually assumed to be negligible as the conduction band wavefunction of GaAs is predominantly s-type.

While in the present sample g-factor anisotropy and quadrupolar effects cannot be eliminated simultaneously, symmetric, possibly back-gated quantum wells31 should allow the elimination of any g-factor anisotropy. The back gate could also be used to tune quadrupolar interaction, as it depends on the electric field, thus allowing further studies.

Given that the strain-induced quadrupole broadening in self-assembled dots was found to be three to four orders of magnitudes larger19,21,28, it likely also has pronounced effects on the coherence22 of this type of quantum dot, which is currently less well understood than that of gated dots. In addition to the above-mentioned second-order coupling with the transverse Overhauser fields, a linear coupling of the parallel field components with the effective spin splitting due to the very large and non-uniformly distributed quadrupole splitting in these systems results in a similar, but more complex echo envelope modulation23.

Furthermore, the echo modulation due to an anisotropic g-factor may also play an important role in III–V nanowire qubits, where strong g-factor anisotropies and short coherence times have been measured34,35.


Qubit system and experimental set-up

The quantum dots used in this work were fabricated on a GaAs/Al0.69Ga0.31As heterostructure with Si-δ doping 50 nm below the surface and a spacer thickness of 40 nm, leaving the 2DEG at 90-nm depth, as shown in Fig. 1a.

Using fast voltage pulses provided by an arbitrary waveform generator (AWG) Tektronix AWG5014C to detune the qubit for manipulation requires thoughtful radio frequency (RF) engineering of the experimental set-up. To avoid any excess pulse distortion, apart from attenuation and skin effect of coaxial cables, we abandon the bias tee and use separate d.c.-coupled static and control gates. Static voltages of order 1 V are applied to the heavily filtered static gates to define and tune the quantum dots. The control gates are used exclusively to apply the mV-scale signals for qubit manipulation. This separation eliminates the need for bias tees and thus provides a nearly flat frequency response of the control gates from d.c. to a few hundred MHz (discussed in Supplementary Note 5 and shown in Supplementary Fig. 2). The control gates are d.c. coupled with the AWG outputs, although heavily attenuated by −33 dBm to reduce thermal noise from room temperature.

Echo sequence

Following the experimental procedure for Hahn spin echo measurements from ref. 12, we first initialize the qubit system in the spin singlet groundstate S by pulsing both electrons into one dot. Rapidly separating the electrons into both dots lets them evolve in different Zeeman fields arising from the external magnetic field Bext and the fluctuating local Overhauser field BL(R) of the left (right) dot for a time . A gradient ΔBz=|BLBR|/2 in the hyperfine field of the two dots leads to coherent rotations between S and T0 and fluctuations in ΔBz cause dephasing. An exchange splitting between the spin singlet S and triplet state T0 arises from inter-dot tunnel coupling. This exchange allows electric control of the qubit by varying the difference in electrostatic potential between the two dots, on the nanosecond timescale with an AWG. Using this exchange interaction to perform a π-pulse by driving rotations between the eigenstates and , we swap the two electrons halfway through the evolution time . Last, we read out the final qubit state by pulsing the electrons into one dot. Using Pauli spin blockade, we distinguish between the singlet and triplet states by measuring the resistance of a nearby sensing dot via RF reflectometry36. Such a pulse cycle with varying evolution times is repeated several million times and the average echo amplitude is recorded. Simultaneous histogramming of individual measurement outcomes is used for normalization2 (see Supplementary Figs 2, 3 and 4 and Supplementary Note 6 for details). The fine tuning of the pulses that was necessary in ref. 12 to avoid artefacts from shifts of the wavefunction has been eliminated due to improved RF engineering.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Botzem, T. et al. Quadrupolar and anisotropy effects on dephasing in two-electron spin qubits in GaAs. Nat. Commun. 7:11170 doi: 10.1038/ncomms11170 (2016).


  1. 1

    Petta, J. R. et al. Coherent manipulation of coupled electron spins in semiconductor quantum dots. Science 309, 2180–2184 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Barthel, C., Reilly, D. J., Marcus, C. M., Hanson, M. P. & Gossard, A. C. Rapid single-shot measurement of a singlet-triplet qubit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 160503 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Foletti, S., Bluhm, H., Mahalu, D., Umansky, V. & Yacoby, A. Universal quantum control of two-electron spin quantum bits using dynamic nuclear polarization. Nat. Phys. 5, 903–908 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Shulman, M. D. et al. Demonstration of entanglement of electrostatically coupled singlet-triplet qubits. Science 336, 202–205 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Press, D. et al. Ultrafast optical spin echo in a single quantum dot. Nat. Photon. 4, 367–370 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Greilich, A. et al. Mode locking of electron spin coherences in singly charged quantum dots. Science 313, 341–345 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Chen, G., Bergman, D. L. & Balents, L. Semiclassical dynamics and long-time asymptotics of the central-spin problem in a quantum dot. Phys. Rev. B 76, 045312 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Cywinski, L., Witzel, W. M. & Das Sarma, S. Pure quantum dephasing of a solid-state electron spin qubit in a large nuclear spin bath coupled by long-range hyperfine-mediated interactions. Phys. Rev. B 79, 245314 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Cywinski, L., Witzel, W. M. & Das Sarma, S. Electron spin dephasing due to hyperfine interactions with a nuclear spin bath. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 057601 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Witzel, W. M. & Das Sarma, S. Quantum theory for electron spin decoherence induced by nuclear spin dynamics in semiconductor quantum computer architectures: Spectral diffusion of localized electron spins in the nuclear solid-state environment. Phys. Rev. B 74, 035322 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Yao, W., Liu, R.-B. & Sham, L. J. Theory of electron spin decoherence by interacting nuclear spins in a quantum dot. Phys. Rev. B 74, 195301 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Bluhm, H. et al. Dephasing time of GaAs electron-spin qubits coupled to a nuclear bath exceeding 200 μs. Nat. Phys. 7, 109–113 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Neder, I. et al. Semiclassical model for the dephasing of a two-electron spin qubit coupled to a coherently evolving nuclear spin bath. Phys. Rev. B 84, 035441 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Lee, B., Witzel, W. M. & Das Sarma, S. Universal pulse sequence to minimize spin dephasing in the central spin decoherence problem. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 160505 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Zwanenburg, F. A. et al. Silicon quantum electronics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 961–1019 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Welander, E., Chekhovich, E., Tartakovskii, A. & Burkard, G. Influence of nuclear quadrupole moments on electron spin coherence in semiconductor quantum dots Preprint at (2014).

  17. 17

    Sinitsyn, N. A., Li, Y., Crooker, S. A., Saxena, A. & Smith, D. L. Role of nuclear quadrupole coupling on decoherence and relaxation of central spins in quantum dots. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 166605 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Munsch, M. et al. Manipulation of the nuclear spin ensemble in a quantum dot with chirped magnetic resonance pulses. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 671–675 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Chekhovich, E. A., Hopkinson, M., Skolnick, M. S. & Tartakovskii, A. I. Suppression of nuclear spin bath fluctuations in self-assembled quantum dots induced by inhomogeneous strain. Nat. Commun. 6, 6348 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Maletinsky, P., Badolato, A. & Imamoglu, A. Dynamics of quantum dot nuclear spin polarization controlled by a single electron. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 056804 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Chekhovich, E. A. et al. Structural analysis of strained quantum dots using nuclear magnetic resonance. Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 646–650 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Bechtold, A. et al. Three-stage decoherence dynamics of an electron spin qubit in an optically active quantum dot. Nat. Phys. 11, 1005–1008 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Stockill, R. et al. Intrinsic limit to electron spin coherence in InGaAs quantum dots featuring strain-induced nuclear dispersion Preprint at (2015).

  24. 24

    Levy, J. Universal quantum computation with spin-1/2 pairs and Heisenberg exchange. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 147902 (2002).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Medford, J. et al. Scaling of dynamical decoupling for spin qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 086802 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Sundfors, R. K. Exchange and quadrupole broadening of nuclear acoustic resonance line shapes in the III-V semiconductors. Phys. Rev. 185, 458–472 (1969).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Dickel, C., Foletti, S., Umansky, V. & Bluhm, H. Characterization of ST+ transition dynamics via correlation measurements. Phys. Rev. B 92, 125402 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Gammon, D. et al. Nuclear spectroscopy in single quantum dots: nanoscopic raman scattering and nuclear magnetic resonance. Science 277, 85–88 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Hester, R. K., Sher, A., Soest, J. F. & Weisz, G. Nuclear-magnetic-resonance detection of charge defects in gallium arsenide. Phys. Rev. B 10, 4262–4273 (1974).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Kalevich, V. K. & Korenev, V. L. Electron g-factor anisotropy in asymmetric GaAs/AlGaAs quantum well. JETP Lett. 57, 571–575 (1993).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Nefyodov, Y. A., Shchepetilnikov, A. V., Kukushkin, I. V., Dietsche, W. & Schmult, S. Electron g-factor anisotropy in GaAsAl1−x Ga x As quantum wells of different symmetry. Phys. Rev. B 84, 233302 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Snelling, M. J. et al. Magnetic g factor of electrons in GaAsAl1−x Ga x As quantum wells. Phys. Rev. B 44, 11345–11352 (1991).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Witzel, W. M. & Das Sarma, S. Wavefunction considerations for the central spin decoherence problem in a nuclear spin bath. Phys. Rev. B 77, 165319 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Nadj-Perge, S. et al. Spectroscopy of spin-orbit quantum bits in indium antimonide nanowires. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 166801 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Nadj-Perge, S., Frolov, S. M., Bakkers, E. P. a. M. & Kouwenhoven, L. P. Spin-orbit qubit in a semiconductor nanowire. Nature 468, 1084–1087 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Reilly, D. J., Marcus, C. M., Hanson, M. P. & Gossard, A. C. Fast single-charge sensing with a RF quantum point contact. Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 162101 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by the Alfried Krupp von Bohlen und Halbach Foundation and DFG grant BL 1197/2-1, BL 1197/4-1 and SFB 689.

Author information




Molecular beam epitaxy growth of the sample was carried out by D.S. and D.B. T.B. and R.P.G.M. set-up the experiment. J.-M.M. extended the data acquisition protocol. T.B. fabricated the sample and conducted the experiment. T.B. and H.B. developed the theoretical model, analysed the data and wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hendrik Bluhm.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures 1-4, Supplementary Notes 1-6 and Supplementary References (PDF 376 kb)

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Botzem, T., McNeil, R., Mol, JM. et al. Quadrupolar and anisotropy effects on dephasing in two-electron spin qubits in GaAs. Nat Commun 7, 11170 (2016).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing