Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Therapeutic targeting and rapid mobilization of endosteal HSC using a small molecule integrin antagonist

Abstract

The inherent disadvantages of using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) mobilization have driven efforts to identify alternate strategies based on single doses of small molecules. Here, we show targeting α9β14β1 integrins with a single dose of a small molecule antagonist (BOP (N-(benzenesulfonyl)-L-prolyl-L-O-(1-pyrrolidinylcarbonyl)tyrosine)) rapidly mobilizes long-term multi-lineage reconstituting HSC. Synergistic engraftment augmentation is observed when BOP is co-administered with AMD3100. Impressively, HSC in equal volumes of peripheral blood (PB) mobilized with this combination effectively out-competes PB mobilized with G-CSF. The enhanced mobilization observed using BOP and AMD3100 is recapitulated in a humanized NODSCIDIL2Rγ−/− model, demonstrated by a significant increase in PB CD34+ cells. Using a related fluorescent analogue of BOP (R-BC154), we show that this class of antagonists preferentially bind human and mouse HSC and progenitors via endogenously primed/activated α9β14β1 within the endosteal niche. These results support using dual α9β14β1 inhibitors as effective, rapid and transient mobilization agents with promising clinical applications.

Introduction

The transplant of mobilized peripheral blood (PB) hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) into patients undergoing treatment for blood diseases has essentially replaced traditional bone marrow (BM) transplants. Current clinical practice for HSC mobilization is achieved with an extended course of recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), which stimulates the production of proteases that cleave many interactions including CXCR4/SDF-1 (refs 1, 2). However, G-CSF-based mobilization requires multiple doses over a number of days, is known to alter the function of the HSC niche as well as bone formation3, can cause bone pain and spleen enlargement and on rare occasions G-CSF results in splenic rupture, myocardial infarction or cerebral ischaemia (reviewed in refs 4, 5). These inherent disadvantages of G-CSF have driven efforts to identify alternate mobilization strategies based on the use of single doses of small molecules6,7. For example, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved chemokine (C-X-C motif) receptor 4 (CXCR4) antagonist AMD3100 (Plerixafor; MozobilTM) has been shown to rapidly mobilize HSC with limited toxicity issues8,9. Nevertheless, clinical mobilization with AMD3100 is only effective in combination with G-CSF and the search for rapid, selective and G-CSF-independent mobilization regimes remains a topic of interest.

HSC regulation and retention within the BM stem cell niche is mediated through multiple interactions between HSC surface receptors and their respective ligands expressed or secreted by surrounding cells: including osteoblasts, sinusoidal endothelial cells and perivascular cells (reviewed in refs 10, 11, 12). Functional analysis of BM HSC demonstrate those with the greatest hematopoietic potential, which preferentially localize in the endosteal region (12 cell diameters from the bone surface13). Of note, HSC identical for the classic LinSca-1+ckit+CD150+CD48 phenotype, but isolated from endosteal BM have greater homing potential and enhanced long-term, multi-lineage hematopoietic reconstitution relative to HSC isolated from the central medullary cavity14. Thus, the therapeutic targeting of endosteal HSC for mobilization should provide better transplant outcomes.

Both α4β1 (VLA-4) and α9β1 expressed by HSC have been implicated in niche retention through binding to thrombin-cleaved osteopontin (trOpn) in the endosteal region15,16 and vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1) expressed by BM stromal cells17. While the role of α9β1 in HSC mobilization is unknown, the down regulation of Opn using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs as well as targeting α4 (for example, α4β1 antagonist BIO5192) with or without AMD3100 or G-CSF have validated trOpn/VCAM-1 binding to integrins as effective targets for HSC mobilization6,18,19,20. Nevertheless, the lack of suitable blocking antibodies and selective small molecules directed towards α9β1 has hindered our understanding of α9β1-dependent HSC mobilization. Furthermore, the specific cell types targeted for mobilization, as well as their location in BM have not previously been investigated.

We recently developed a fluorescent integrin antagonist, R-BC154 (ref. 21) based on the small molecule N-(benzenesulfonyl)-L-prolyl-L-O-(1-pyrrolidinylcarbonyl)tyrosine22 (BOP), which we previously demonstrated to bind effectively to α9β1 and α4β1 integrins in the presence of divalent metal cations21. Based on the interaction between α9β14β1 and trOpn being restricted to endosteal BM, we postulated that this family of compounds would target potent endosteal HSC for mobilization. Herein, we show that R-BC154 and BOP preferentially bind endosteally located human and murine BM HSC and progenitors in vitro and in vivo and this binding is highly dependent on α9β1. Consequently, administration of a single dose of BOP results in the rapid and preferential mobilization of HSC and progenitors in mice and humanized mouse models, and is synergistically augmented when used in combination with AMD3100. When BOP is co-administered with AMD3100, greater mobilization is observed relative to AMD3100 in combination with the selective α4β1 antagonist BIO5192, identifying an active role for α9β1 in small molecule-mediated mobilization. A single dose of BOP and AMD3100 is also shown to mobilize HSC with greater long-term repopulation potential than HSC following a 4-day G-CSF regime. Together, our results show therapeutic targeting of BM HSC using α9β14β1 inhibitors either alone or in combination with AMD3100 offers promising alternatives to current mobilization strategies.

Results

R-BC154 and BIO5192 reveals specific binding to HSC α9β1

To assess the specific targeting of α9β1 on HSC by small molecule antagonists, we developed an in vitro assay using the selective and potent (Kd<10 pM) α4β1 antagonist BIO5192 (ref. 23), the dual α9β14β1 antagonist BOP and its fluorescent analogue R-BC154 (Fig. 1a); which we have demonstrated to efficiently bind to both human21 and murine (Supplementary Fig. 1a) α9β1 and α4β1 integrins in a divalent metal cation-dependent manner. This is in contrast to BIO5192, which binds α4β1 in the presence and absence of divalent metal cations23. The co-labelling of both human and murine α9β14β1 with R-BC154 and excess BIO5192 allowed the specific detection of binding to α9β1 (Fig. 1b,c). In contrast, R-BC154 labelling in combination with excess BOP completely inhibited R-BC154 binding to both human and murine α9β14β1 integrins (Fig. 1b,c). Given the ubiquitous expression of α4β1 on all hematopoietic cells, the combination of R-BC154 with BIO5192 provides a convenient method of measuring specific binding to α9β1 on hematopoietic stem and progenitors.

Figure 1: R-BC154 and BOP preferentially bind human and murine HSC and progenitors in a divalent cation and integrin-dependent manner.
figure 1

(a) Chemical structure of R-BC154 (1) and BOP (2). (b) Use of R-BC154, BOP and BIO5192 to demonstrate specific detection of binding to α9 (grey) in human and (c) murine overexpressing cell lines (LN18 and CHO respectively) compared with α4 (black) in the presence of 1 mM Ca2+/Mg2+ n=3 and is representative of at least two independent experiments. (d) Dose response of R-BC154 binding to human CB MNC. n=3 and is representative of two independent experiments. Binding in the presence of cations is significantly greater at all concentrations except 0 nM (P<0.005). (e) Representative populations of CB HSC (CD34+CD38), progenitors (CD34+CD38+) and committed cells (CD34CD38+). (f) R-BC154 binding to CB MNC committed cells, progenitors and HSC in the presence of 1 mM Ca2+/Mg2+ alone, or in combination with BOP or BIO5192. Data are representative of three individual samples. US, unstained. α9—specific binding via α9β1, α4—specific binding via α4β1. (g) Specific binding of R-BC154 binding to α9β1 on CB-committed cells (CC), progenitors (prog) and HSC. n=3 (h) R-BC154 binding to human BM (huBM). Data are representative of three individual samples. (i) Specific binding of R-BC154 to huBM α9β1. n=3 (j) α9β1 expression on huBM progenitors and HSC (grey solid line, dashed line IgG1 isotype control). Data are representative of three individual samples. (k) R-BC154 binding to humanized NSG (huNSG) BM. Data are representative of three individual samples. (l) Specific binding of R-BC154 to huNSG BM α9β1. n=3. (m) α9β1 expression on huNSG BM progenitors and HSC (grey solid line, dashed line IgG1 isotype control). Data are representative of three individual samples. (n) R-BC154 binding to mu BM-committed cells, progenitors (LinSca-1+c-kit+; LSK) and HSC (LSKCD150+CD48; LSKSLAM). Data are representative of three individual samples. (o) Specific binding of R-BC154 to mu BM α9β1. n=3. CB CD34+ cells were transplanted into 6.5 week old male (n=1) and female (n=2) NSG mice (k,l). Around 7–8-week-old female C57 mice were used for n and o. All data are mean±s.e.m. Analysis using one-way ANOVA (g,i,l,o) or two-way ANOVA (d), *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.005, ****P<0.001.

R-BC154 and BOP preferentially bind HSC and progenitors

We have previously demonstrated human HSC express α9β1 and its interaction with trOpn regulates HSC quiescence16. To determine whether dual α9β14β1 antagonists bind human HSC via α9β1, R-BC154 binding to cord blood (CB) mononuclear cells (MNC) was assessed and shown to be divalent cation and dose dependent, and saturable (Fig. 1d). Analysis of CB HSC (CD34+CD38), progenitors (CD34+CD38+) and lineage-committed cells (CD34CD38+) (Fig. 1e) revealed high R-BC154 binding to HSC and progenitors, but only modest binding to committed cells in the presence of 1 mM Ca2+/Mg2+ (Fig. 1f). Furthermore, co-incubation of these populations with R-BC154 in combination with BIO5192 demonstrated partial inhibition of R-BC154 binding to HSC and progenitors (reflective of binding via both α9β1 and α4β1) and complete inhibition of binding to lineage-committed cells (reflective of binding only via α4β1) (Fig. 1f). In contrast, as BOP effectively binds both α9β1 and α4β1, its addition resulted in complete inhibition of R-BC154 binding to all cell populations (Fig. 1f). Together, these data demonstrate a significant proportion of R-BC154 binding to HSC and progenitors via α9β1, while binding to committed cells is mediated exclusively through α4β1 (Fig. 1g).

In addition, R-BC154 efficiently bound HSC and progenitors isolated from human BM in the presence of Ca2+/Mg2+(Fig. 1h) and similarly to that evident with CB cells, the majority of this binding was via α9β1 compared with committed cells that primarily bound via α4β1 (Fig. 1i). These data are consistent with the high α9β1 expression evident on human BM HSC and progenitors (Fig. 1j).

R-BC154 binding to human HSC was further evaluated using humanized NODSCIDIL2Rγ−/− (huNSG) mice (Supplementary Fig. 1b)24. R-BC154-bound human BM-committed cells, progenitors and HSC in the presence of Ca2+/Mg2+ (Fig. 1k), but significant binding through α9β1 only occurred on HSC (Fig. 1l), which is consistent with α9β1 expression being restricted to HSC (Fig. 1m). In contrast, α4β1 was highly expressed on all three populations (Supplementary Fig. 1c).

The ubiquitous expression of α4β1 on hematopoietic cells, together with the restricted expression of α9β1 on HSC resulted in an additive R-BC154 binding to HSC relative to progenitors and committed cells (Supplementary Fig. 1d). Furthermore, single-cell correlation analysis of scaled fluorescence intensity values for both R-BC154 binding to α9β1 in the presence of BIO5192 (to prevent any binding to α4β1) and α9β1 expression (Supplementary Fig. 1e) shows a positive correlation in specific binding of BOP to α9β1 on CB HSC with the expression of α9β1. Together these data highlight the potential for human HSC and/or progenitors to be targeted in preference to lineage-committed cells using selective α9β1 antagonists.

Consistent with their human counterparts, analysis of R-BC154 binding to murine BM progenitors and HSC (Supplementary Fig. 1f; Fig. 1n) revealed this to be cation (Supplementary Fig. 1g) and α49 (Supplementary Fig. 1h) dependent. Similarly to their human counterparts, a significant proportion of R-BC154 binding to murine HSC was via α9β1 whereas binding to lineage-committed cells was mediated primarily through α4β1 (Fig. 1o).

R-BC154 binding to murine BM progenitors and HSC was confirmed in vivo following subcutaneous administration of R-BC154, with similar levels of binding to that observed in the presence of exogenous Ca2+/Mg2+ in vitro (Supplementary Fig. 1i). The specific and reversible nature of R-BC154 binding in vivo was confirmed by efficient displacement of in situ-bound R-BC154 with the addition of excess competing BOP in vitro (Supplementary Fig. 1j,k).

Endosteal HSC α9β14β1 are endogenously activated

To date, a number of studies have demonstrated integrins adopt three conformational states: (1) inactive or low affinity; (2) activated (primed) or high affinity; and (3) ligand occupied (reviewed in ref. 25). This integrin activity is regulated via both inside-out activation or outside-in activation26,27. In the BM stem cell niche, the regulation of integrins on HSC is complex and has not been accurately mimicked or recapitulated in vitro28. In addition, we have previously shown that the region in which BM HSC reside has a profound influence on their function, with HSC isolated from the endosteal region having higher hematopoietic potential than their central counterparts14,29. Whilst the mechanisms of these differences remain poorly understood, significant differences in cellular and extracellular matrix molecules have been described in different BM regions, many of which are likely to play a role30,31.

To determine whether α9β14β1 integrins expressed by HSC and progenitors within different regions of BM are differentially primed/activated in situ, R-BC154 binding to endosteal and central human BM HSC in huNSG mice was assessed (Fig. 2a). Endosteal huCD34+ cells isolated from huNSG mice injected subcutaneously with R-BC154 exhibited significantly greater binding than their central counterparts (Fig. 2b). In addition, when huNSG BM cells from either endosteal or central regions were labelled with R-BC154 in vitro in the absence of exogenous cations, only binding to endosteal progenitors and HSC was detected (Fig. 2c,d) although no differences in the expression of α9β1 or α4β1 was evident on cells from the central or endosteal BM regions (Supplementary Fig. 1l). Similarly, R-BC154 binding in the absence of exogenous cations was also restricted to murine HSC and progenitors harvested from endosteal BM (Fig. 2e,f). These data demonstrate that integrins expressed by endosteal stem and progenitors are endogenously activated or primed and remain in this ligand-binding receptive conformational state post harvest.

Figure 2: R-BC154 targets HSC and progenitors via endogenously activated/primed α49 integrins in endosteal BM.
figure 2

(a) Schematic of central BM (cBM; blue) and endosteal BM (eBM; orange). (b) in vivo R-BC154 binding to huNSG central (blue) and endosteal (orange) BM huCD34+ cells compared with uninjected control (grey). Data are representative of three animals. (c) In vitro R-BC154 binding to huNSG central and endosteal BM progenitors (CD34+CD38+ cells) and HSC (CD34+CD38 cells) in the absence of exogenous cations compared with uninjected control. Data are the representative of three samples. (d) Quantified R-BC154 binding from c, n=3. (e) In vitro R-BC154 binding to murine central and endosteal BM progenitors (LSK cells) and HSC (LSKSLAM cells) in the absence of exogenous cations compared to uninjected control. Data are representative of >10 samples. (f) Quantified R-BC154 binding from e, n=5. (g) Representative XFM images depicting the elastic scattering, Compton scattering and calcium distribution profile of a diaphyseal cross-section of non-decalcified murine femur. White arrow depicts calcium gradient radiating away from the endosteal surface (red dotted line). The hashed white line at 100 μm from the bone surface represents the interface between eBM and cBM. (h) Calcium content across representative line a to b in g, which begins 20 μm and extends to 220 μm from the endosteal surface. Data are expressed as arbitrary units (a.u.) n=10 different lines a to b. Representative of three animals. (i) Quantitative analysis of calcium, magnesium and manganese in murine BM central and endosteal extracellular fluid, (j) membrane bound (k) and intracellular. n=3. The endosteal extracellular component has been corrected for mechanically caused release (Supplementary Fig. 2a). CB CD34+ cells were transplanted into 9-week-old female NSG mice (bd). Around 7–8-week-old female mice were used for eh. All data are mean±s.e.m. Analysis using t-test, *P<0.05, ***P<0.005, ****P<0.001.

Divalent metal cations are concentrated at the endosteum

The precise mechanisms leading to integrin priming/activation in vivo remain unclear, although previous studies have demonstrated activation of α4 in vitro via a number of mechanisms including ligand binding32,33, divalent cations34 and cytokines35,36.

In the in vivo endosteal BM region, differences in α9β14β1 activation states may in part be due to the binding of their ligands, such as trOpn, which we have previously demonstrated to be restricted to this region16. However, the endogenously primed integrin activation state may also be due to the higher concentrations of divalent metal cations (for example, Ca2+, Mg2+ and Mn2+) present in endosteal BM in situ. Elemental mapping of non-decalcified cross-sections of diaphyseal murine femoral BM using X-ray fluorescence microscopy (XFM) was used to assess calcium content. Areas of cortical bone and cells were verified by bright-field microscopy and could be distinguished by XFM based on their elastic, Compton and calcium scattering profiles. Specifically, bone is elastichigh/Comptonhigh/calciumhigh while marrow cells are elasticlow/Comptonhigh/calciumlow (Fig. 2g). Measurement of calcium in BM demonstrated a distinct concentration gradient, emanating from the endosteal bone/BM interface and decreasing towards the central BM and central vein (Fig. 2g,h). XFM was unable to distinguish magnesium due to strong absorption of Mg K shell fluorescence by the air path and the intense Fe K shell fluorescence severely limited sensitivity to manganese.

In addition, BM magnesium, manganese and calcium content were assessed using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), which revealed a greater abundance of calcium and manganese in endosteal extracellular fluid relative to central BM (Fig. 2i) as well calcium, magnesium and manganese bound to the cellular membranes of endosteal cells relative to central BM cells (Fig. 2j). To ensure the accuracy of these measurements, the proportion of each cation that was mechanically released by grinding the bone to isolate the endosteal cells was measured and subtracted from the raw extracellular measurements (Supplementary Fig. 2a). Furthermore, the ability of the combination of these mechanically released cation concentrations to activate integrins on central BM cells was assessed by measuring the binding of R-BC154 to progenitors and HSC after treatment with the endosteal extracellular fluid (as assessed in Fig. 2i). As a further control, the measured concentrations of ‘mechanically released’ cations were added to central marrow cells and their ability to activate integrins resulting in the binding of R-BC154 assessed. No evidence of R-BC154 was detected under any of these conditions (Supplementary Fig. 2b) confirming the endogenous activation of integrins before cell isolation.

In contrast, the concentrations of these three cations located intracellularly was equivalent in cells located in the endosteal and central BM regions (Fig. 2k). Collectively, these data demonstrate higher concentrations of divalent metal cations required for integrin function within endosteal BM. Together with extracellular matrix (ECM) ligands such as trOpn or VCAM-1 and other cytokines, this would result in integrins on endosteal HSC being maintained in an activated/primed/ligand-occupied conformational binding state, thus potentially forming the mechanism underpinning preferential targeting of endosteal HSC and progenitors by integrin antagonists such as R-BC154 and BOP.

BOP rapidly and preferentially mobilizes HSC and progenitors

As BOP rapidly and preferentially binds BM HSC, the ability of BOP to mobilize HSC to the PB was initially analysed in a dose and time response assay and by quantifying progenitors (LSK) and HSC (LSKSLAM) post-subcutaneous BOP administration (Fig. 3a,b). The administration of BOP resulted in a rapid, significant and dose-dependent increase in PB progenitors and HSC (Fig. 3a), which peaked 60 min after a single dose (Fig. 3b) and returned to baseline within 4 h post administration (Supplementary Fig. 2c,d). Furthermore, whilst there was an initial significant increase in total PB lymphocytes, these also decreased to baseline by 18 h (Supplementary Fig. 2e).

Figure 3: The α9β14β1 integrin antagonist BOP rapidly mobilizes murine long-term repopulating HSC.
figure 3

(a) Dose-dependent mobilization of murine progenitors (LSK, white square) and HSC (LSKSLAM, grey square) with BOP. Data are pooled from two biological repeats; n>3 per group. (b) Time-course of progenitor and HSC mobilization with 10 mg kg−1 BOP. Time 0 is the vehicle control group. Data are pooled from two biological repeats. n=5 Individual animals per time point, not repetitive analysis. (c) Representative dot plots of PB progenitors and (d) HSC 1 h after a single dose of vehicle, BOP, AMD3100 or BOP+AMD3100 in combination, n>3. (e) Analysis of progenitor and HSC content in PB after 1 h treatment with vehicle, BOP, AMD3100 or BOP+AMD3100 in combination. (f) Total PB progenitor and HSC content 1 h after a single dose of vehicle (n=5), BIO5192 alone (n=5) or in combination with AMD3100 (n=5), or BOP in combination with AMD3100 (n=3). (g) Schematic of limiting dilution transplant analysis of mobilized RFP PB (five recipients per group). Representative dot plots of recipient BM multi-lineage engraftment. (h) Survival of recipients transplanted with 30 μl of RFP-mobilized PB. (i) Long-term HSC frequency in PB mobilized following BOP (green line), AMD3100 (red line) or BOP+AMD3100 (blue line). Around 7–8-week-old female (ae) and male (f) C57 mice were used. 7–8 week old male (n=15) and female (n=10) RFP donors and male C57 recipients were used for gi. All data are mean±s.e.m. Analysis using one-way ANOVA, *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.005, ****P<0.001.

In contrast, R-BC154, although capable of efficiently binding BM progenitors (LSK cells) and HSC (LSKSLAM cells) in vitro (Supplementary Fig. 1h), only resulted in moderate increase in PB progenitors and HSC when administered in vivo (Supplementary Fig. 2f). The reduced in vivo efficacy of R-BC154 relative to BOP is most likely the result of the former having lower binding affinities as determined by association and dissociation kinetics studies in vitro21,22 and thus reduced inhibitory potency towards integrin-dependent adhesive interactions.

Using BOP and targeting CXCR4 enhances HSC mobilization

Previous studies have shown that the inhibition of α4β1 results in additive/synergistic HSC mobilization when used in combination with CXCR4 antagonists such as AMD3100 (refs 6, 37, 38). Administration of AMD3100 resulted in similar increase in WBC counts (7.8±1.5 × 106 ml−1) relative to BOP (7.0±0.8 × 106 ml−1) and comparable increases in the proportion of progenitors (LSK cells) in the PB (Fig. 3c). However, BOP resulted in a significantly greater increase in the proportion of HSC (LSKSLAM cells) in the PB relative to AMD3100 (Fig. 3d; P<0.05), suggesting AMD3100 predominantly mobilizes progenitors in addition to some HSC, while BOP predominantly mobilizes HSC in addition to some progenitors. In addition, the combination of BOP and AMD3100 synergistically mobilized WBC (16.4±1.9 × 106 ml−1), progenitors and HSC compared with BOP or AMD3100 alone (Fig. 3e). Interestingly, significantly greater binding of BOP to endosteal LSK was observed relative to their central counterparts in vivo (Supplementary Fig. 2g), further supporting the data obtained using R-BC154 (Fig. 2b–f).

Inhibiting α9β1, α4β1 and CXCR4 enhances HSC mobilization

To determine whether co-inhibition of α9β1 provides a mobilization advantage over the inhibition of α4β1 alone or in combination with CXCR4, the selective α4β1 inhibitor BIO5192 was used. BIO5192 has been reported to mobilize CFUs and long-term repopulating HSC with and without AMD3100 (ref. 6) but the specific cell types mobilized were not investigated. Intravenous administration of BIO5192 resulted in only moderate increase in WBC counts (Supplementary Fig. 2h), progenitors (LSK cells) and HSC (LSKSLAM cells) in the PB (Fig. 3f). Co-administration of BIO5192 with AMD3100 produced significant increases in total WBC (Supplementary Fig. 2h) but only a moderate 2.4-fold increase in progenitors and 1.4-fold increase in HSC compared with BIO5192 alone (Fig. 3f). This is in stark contrast to the combination of BOP and AMD3100, which mobilized significantly greater numbers of progenitors and HSC (Fig. 3f) despite inducing similar PB WBC counts (Supplementary Fig. 2h). These data demonstrate that concomitant binding to CXCR4 and α4β1 results in mobilization of predominantly committed WBC but in contrast, co-binding to α4β1 and α9β1 results in significantly increased HSC mobilization.

Inhibiting α9β1 and α4β1 mobilizes functional HSC

To confirm whether the LSKSLAM and LSK cell phenotype in mobilized PB was reflective of functional HSC and progenitors with long-term multi-lineage engraftment potential, limiting dilution transplant analysis was performed using BOP, AMD3100 or the combination thereof (Fig. 3g). Greater survival was observed in recipients receiving 30 μl PB mobilized using the combination of BOP and AMD3100 compared with both BOP and AMD3100 alone (P<0.05) (Fig. 3h). Furthermore, Poisson regression analysis following limiting dilution transplant revealed PB mobilized by the BOP and AMD3100 combination resulted in a greater repopulation frequency of 1 HSC in 23 μl PB (95% confidence interval (CI)=1 HSC in 10 μl to 1 HSC in 51 μl) compared with BOP (1 HSC in 327 μl; 95% CI=1 HSC in 150 μl to 1 HSC in 715 μl) or AMD3100 (1 HSC in 351 μl; 95% CI=1 HSC in 128 μl to 1 HSC in 958 μl) alone, highlighting a greater than 10-fold improvement to mono-therapy (P<0.005) (Fig. 3i). These results demonstrate that treatment with BOP either alone or in combination with AMD3100, mobilizes long-term repopulating HSC and validates flow cytometric monitoring of the LSKSLAM phenotype as a rapid method for assessing murine HSC mobilization39.

BOP+AMD3100 is an effective and rapid G-CSF alternative

Multiple reports have shown G-CSF-dependent mobilization can be synergistically augmented by co-treatment with cytotoxic agents, inhibitors of CXCR4 and inhibitors of α4, αL and β1 (refs 9, 18, 40, 41, 42). Consistent with these reports, the treatment of mice with a single dose of BOP following 4 days of G-CSF resulted in significant synergistic increases in the incidence and the total numbers of progenitors (LSK) and HSC (LSKSLAM cells) relative to G-CSF alone (Supplementary Fig. 3a,b and Fig. 4a, respectively).

Figure 4: BOP and AMD3100 combination is a rapid and effective alternative to G-CSF.
figure 4

(a) Analysis of PB progenitor (LSK) and HSC (LSKSLAM) content following a single dose of BOP (n=4), 4 days of G-CSF (n=3) or 4 days of G-CSF+1 dose of BOP (n=3). Data are representative of three independent experiments. (b) Analysis of PB progenitor and HSC content following a single dose of BOP+AMD3100 (n=8), 4 days of G-CSF (n=3), 4 days of G-CSF+1 dose of AMD3100 (n=9) or 4 days of G-CSF+1 dose of BOP+AMD3100 (n=8). Data are a pool of two independent experiments. (c) Schematic of serial competitive transplant assay. (d) Proportion of PB RFP+ white blood cells (WBC) in 1° recipients. Each data point is an individual recipient from one of two transplants. 1st=crosses, 2nd=circles. Dashed line is mathematically expected engraftment level. (e) Analysis of PB RFP+ and GFP+ lymphoid (B220+ and CD3+) and myeloid (Gr1+/Mac1+) engraftment in 1° recipients. n=8; pooled from 1st and 2nd experiments. (f) 2° recipient PB analysis. Each data point is an individual recipient. Dashed line is mathematically expected engraftment level. (g) Analysis of PB RFP+ and GFP+ lymphoid (B220+ and CD3+) and myeloid (Gr1+/Mac1+) engraftment in 2° recipients 20 weeks post transplant. Data are grouped based on the 5 individual 2° donors. n=4 2°recipients per donor. UD=undetectable. Around 7–8-week-old female C57 mice were used for a and b. Around 6–7-week-old male RFP and GFP and 9-week-old female C57 recipients were used for d and e. Secondary C57 recipients were 7 weeks old (f,g). All data are mean±s.e.m. Analysis using one-way ANOVA (a,b), or t-test (d,f) *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.005, ****P<0.001.

Importantly, in comparison to mobilization with 4 days of G-CSF, equivalent numbers of progenitors and equivalent proportion and number of HSC were mobilized using a single dose of the combination of BOP and AMD3100 (Fig. 4b and Supplementary Fig. 3c,d, respectively). In contrast, the combination of G-CSF and AMD3100 mobilized significantly more progenitors and HSC (Fig. 4b; Supplementary Fig. 3c,d). However, the greatest number of progenitors and HSC were mobilized with the combination of 4 days of G-CSF followed by a single dose of AMD3100 and BOP with a significant synergistic increase compared with G-CSF alone or the combination of AMD3100 and BOP (Fig. 4b).

To compare the hematopoietic potential of PB mobilized with multiple doses of G-CSF versus a single dose of BOP and AMD3100, a competitive long-term reconstitution assay was used (Fig. 4c). Despite equivalent numbers of HSC being mobilized following G-CSF and the combination of BOP and AMD3100 (Fig. 4b), significantly enhanced short and long-term multi-lineage engraftment was observed in the PB and BM using the latter (Fig. 4d,e and Supplementary Fig. 3e,f, respectively). Furthermore, this significantly greater engraftment than was mathematically expected was maintained in the PB and BM of secondary transplants (Fig. 4f,g and Supplementary Fig. 3g,h, respectively). The greater engraftment observed with BOP and AMD3100-mobilized PB suggests cells with the LSK/LSKSLAM phenotype mobilized by G-CSF have reduced hematopoietic potential, which is consistent with previous findings demonstrating G-CSF-mobilized LSK cells have significantly impaired engraftment potential relative to native BM LSK43.

BOP+AMD3100 mobilizes human CD34+ HSC in humanized mice

To determine whether HSC mobilization using BOP is equivalent in humans, we utilized huNSG mice (Fig. 5a)24,44. Treatment with a single dose of BOP or AMD3100, or multiple doses of G-CSF for 4 days alone did not result in a significant increase in PB human WBC (Supplementary Fig. 4) or human CD34+ stem and progenitors (Fig. 5b). In contrast, a single dose of BOP in combination with AMD3100 resulted in a significant increase in both human WBC (Supplementary Fig. 4) and stem and progenitors (Fig. 5b). These data demonstrate huNSG mice are a useful surrogate model for human HSC mobilization and demonstrate the promising efficacy of BOP and AMD3100 for rapid clinical mobilization of human CD34+ cells.

Figure 5: The combination of BOP and AMD3100 effectively mobilizes human CD34+ stem and progenitors in humanized NSG (huNSG) mice.
figure 5

(a) Representative flow cytometric plot of huNSG PB. (b) Analysis of huCD45+CD34+ cell content in huNSG PB following mobilization. Data are expressed as fold increase in CD34+ cells per ml PB relative to saline control and each data point represents an individual animal. Red bar, mean. CB CD34+ cells were transplanted into 6–10-week-old female and male NSG mice. Analysis using one-way ANOVA, **P<0.01, ****P<0.001.

Discussion

Mobilization of HSC and progenitors for PB stem cell transplants has been clinically adopted for over 30 years. In normal healthy donors, HSC mobilization is used in over three-quarters of allogeneic transplants and is predominantly achieved using standard multi-dose G-CSF over several days. In recent times, significant advances have been made to address the shortcomings of G-CSF (reviewed in ref. 45) such as the development of CXCR4 antagonists including the FDA-approved AMD3100 (refs 8, 9) and experimental agents such as ALT-1188 (ref. 38) and TG-0054 (ref. 46). For mobilizing healthy donors, identifying novel agents that effectively, safely, rapidly and selectively mobilize HSC in a single dose remains clinically important.

HSC are known to express a large number of integrins including α4β1 and α9β1, which have critical roles in HSC regulation in BM16. Previous studies have confirmed that the inhibition of integrin α4β1 and VCAM-1 interactions using neutralizing antibodies or specific small molecule inhibitors effectively mobilize HSC in both mice and primates6,18,19. However, the role of the related α9β1 in this context is unexplored, in large part due to the lack of effective anti-α9-blocking antibodies that target HSC in vivo or specific α9-targeting small molecules. However, given the role α4β1 plays in HSC mobilization and the fact that α9 and α4 share several ligands including VCAM-1 and trOpn, a role for α9β1 in HSC mobilization would not be unexpected. Previously, in vitro studies using α9-blocking antibodies were found to inhibit CD34+ cell proliferation, differentiation and adhesion to primary osteoblasts47. In addition, we demonstrated α9β1/trOpn interactions are potently chemotactic for HSC and blocking antibodies directed to α9β1 completely inhibits the migration of HSC in vitro16. α9β1 has also been reported to mediate G-CSF receptor signalling pathways and contribute to granulopoiesis, as mice lacking α9 have reduced BM granulocyte precursors as well as impaired neutrophil development in response to G-CSF48.

In this study, we demonstrate targeting of α9β14β1 using a single dose of BOP22, induces rapid mobilization of long-term repopulating HSC through inhibiting integrin-dependent binding, most likely to trOpn15,16 and VCAM-1 (ref. 17). Using the fluorescent BOP analogue, R-BC154, we demonstrate a significant proportion of binding to human and murine HSC occurs through α9β1, whereas binding to lineage-committed cells is almost exclusively through α4β1. Consequently, inhibition of α9β1 was found to provide an added advantage to HSC mobilization yields over inhibition of α4β1 alone as demonstrated by the significantly greater mobilization of HSC and progenitors using BOP in comparison to the selective α4β1 antagonist BIO5192; particularly when used in combination with AMD3100. The reduced synergism in HSC mobilization, but not WBC mobilization using BIO5192 in combination with AMD3100 compared with BOP in combination with AMD3100 supports targeting α4 biases towards progenitor mobilization whereas targeting α9 preferentially mobilizes HSC. The pronounced increase in AMD3100-mediated mobilization using BOP relative to BIO5192 suggests the role of integrin α9β1 in HSC mobilization is magnified with concomitant targeting of CXCR4.

As expected, with the distinct mechanisms of action between BOP, AMD3100 and G-CSF, the combination of these three agents resulted in the greatest increase in LSK and LSKSLAM mobilization when compared with any other combination. Thus, BOP in combination with G-CSF and AMD3100 is likely to have significant advantages over mobilization using the combination of G-CSF and AMD3100; although further research is required to define the functional capacity of these mobilized blood products. Currently, the combination of G-CSF and AMD3100 is most commonly used in autologous transplants, as the combination is effective and superior to G-CSF alone49. However, in a clinical context, the use of AMD3100 has advantages compared with G-CSF, as it directly targets HSC, without altering the function of the HSC niche, or bone formation3, which is especially important for the mobilization of normal donors. As a consequence, the use of BOP, which also directly targets HSC, will be most advantageous in combination with AMD3100 as opposed to BOP alone, as a potential rapid, single dose alternative to G-CSF for the specific targeting of HSC in the mobilization of normal donors for allogeneic transplants.

We have previously shown BM HSC residing within the endosteal region exhibit greater hematopoietic potential than HSC isolated from the central medullary region14,29. The functional characteristics of the endosteal BM have been a topic of great interest since the concept of a stem cell niche was originally postulated by Schofield50. Studies highlighted the endosteal niche as a hypoxic environment51 where cells such as osteoblasts52,53, endothelial cells54, perivascular cells12, megakaryocytes55 as well as their associated ECM proteins are important regulators of HSC maintenance and function. Herein, we show HSC and progenitors isolated from the endosteal region express α9β14β1 that are in a higher affinity, ligand-primed binding conformation relative to cells from the central compartment. Although the physiological relevance of this differential integrin activity remains unknown, these observations are consistent with previous reports that HSC-dependent binding between trOpn and α4β1 and α9β1 is restricted to endosteal BM15,16.

One possible explanation for the enhanced priming/activation of integrins on HSC in endosteal BM are their close proximity to bone. Bone has a very high mineral content and is the primary storage site of the inorganic salts of calcium and magnesium as well as trace metals such as manganese56,57: all of which are known to play a role in α9β1 and α4β1 adopting the conformational changes required for ligand binding21,22,58. Using XFM and quantitative ICP-MS, we demonstrate that endosteal BM harbours a significantly greater concentration of elemental calcium, magnesium and manganese relative to the central medullary region. The data strongly suggest this high divalent metal ion content plays a previously unrecognized role in differential integrin priming/activation within BM. Although direct evidence of divalent metal concentration gradients in BM have not been reported until now, the concept has previously been invoked to rationalize the preferential localization of HSC within endosteal BM via recognition of extracellular Ca2+ through the G protein-coupled calcium-sensing receptor59. Collectively, these observations further define the unique nature of the endosteal niche, the differential influence it confers in seemingly phenotypically identical cells and provides validation for therapeutic targeting of the endosteal stem cell niche for stem cell therapies60,61.

G-CSF induces the mobilization of BM HSC and progenitors by causing a ‘cytokine storm’ that results in the cleavage of key retentive HSC interactions such as CXCR4/SDF-1 (refs 1, 2) and VCAM-1/α4β1. In addition, evidence supports G-CSF and/or chemotherapy treatment causing a reduction in the homing and engraftment potential of mobilized PB compared with BM HSC, which has been suggested to be due to disruption of the HSC microenvironment62. In addition, previous studies in mice showed G-CSF-mobilized PB LSK cells have reduced colony-forming capacity and long-term reconstitution potential compared with their untreated BM counterparts43,63. Furthermore, in healthy human donors mobilized using G-CSF, apheresis products contained reduced frequencies of NOD/SCID repopulating cells compared with AMD3100-mobilized PB from the same donors64. The current study adds to these findings, demonstrating G-CSF mobilizes proportionally more phenotypic LSK progenitors than LSKSLAM HSC and following a transplant of equal volumes of mobilized PB, the use of G-CSF resulted in a reduced capacity to sustain long-term hematopoiesis relative to mobilized PB using the combination of BOP and AMD3100. Together, these results support previous findings that G-CSF-mobilized HSC and progenitors have reduced in vitro and in vivo capacity relative to their well-defined BM counterparts in steady state43.

Variability observed with HSC mobilization following G-CSF is well documented, both within patients and in different mouse strains65. For example, BALB/c mice are effectively mobilized by G-CSF, whereas C57BL/6 mice are considered ‘poor mobilizers’39. Although the NODSCIDIL2Rγ−/− mouse model has routinely and successfully been used to assess the hematopoietic potential of human HSC and progenitors24, previous studies have not assessed the ability of G-CSF to effectively mobilize CD34+ cells in humanized NODSCIDIL2Rγ−/− mice. The current data demonstrate significant impairment. In contrast, the combination of BOP and AMD3100 resulted in significant mobilization of human CD34+ cells, suggesting the use of this strategy may be effective in clinical mobilization of human donors.

In summary, we demonstrate that a single dose of BOP, a small molecule targeting α4β1 and α9β1 integrins, effectively and rapidly mobilizes HSC with long-term multi-lineage engraftment potential, identifying a previously unrecognized role for α9β1 in HSC mobilization. When used in combination with CXCR4 inhibitors such as AMD3100, significantly enhanced mobilization of long-term repopulating HSC was observed relative to G-CSF. The efficacy of HSC mobilization using the BOP and AMD3100 combination was recapitulated in the mobilization of CD34+ cells in humanized NODSCIDIL2Rγ−/− mice. Using the related fluorescently labelled integrin antagonist R-BC154, we show that this class of compounds bind murine and human HSC and progenitors via endogenously activated/primed α4β1 and α9β1 within the endosteal niche. Furthermore, we show that the majority of R-BC154/BOP binding to human HSC occurs via α9β1, which is absent on lineage-committed cells. These results highlight an effective and convenient strategy of therapeutically targeting endosteal HSC which address many of the shortcomings associated with G-CSF and paves the way for the development of additional selective small molecule α9β1 integrin antagonists for preferential HSC mobilization.

Methods

Compounds and reagents

R-BC154 and BOP were synthesized according to previously published methods21,22. BIO5192 (Tocris Bioscience), AMD3100 (octahydrochloride hydrate salt) (Sigma-Aldrich) and human G-CSF (Filgrastim, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA) were used without further purification. For in vivo experiments, lyophilized powders of R-BC154 and BOP sodium salts were dissolved in 10% hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (HPβCD) in saline (w/v). A stock solution of BIO5192 in DMSO (10 mg ml−1) was diluted to 0.1 mg ml−1 in 10% HPβCD/saline immediately before use.

Mice

C57BL/6, red fluorescent protein (RFP), green fluorescent protein (GFP), α4flox/floxα9flox/flox vav-cre, NODSCIDIL2Rγ−/− (NSG) mice were bred at Monash Animal Services (Monash University, Clayton, Australia). Conditional α4flox/floxα9flox/flox mice were initially generated by cross-breeding α4flox/flox mice with α9flox/flox mice and vav-cre mice. For transplants, irradiation was given in a split dose (5.25 Gy each) 6 h apart, 24 h before transplant for C57BL/6 mice and in a single dose (2.75 Gy) 5 h before transplant for NSG mice and a total of 2 × 105 irradiated (15 Gy) C57BL/6 BM cells or 2 × 106 irradiated (15 Gy) umbilical CB MNC given as support cells to each recipient, respectively. All experiments were approved by Monash Animal Services Ethics Committee.

Umbilical CB and human BM

Umbilical CB and human BM were obtained from the Mercy Hospital for Women (East Melbourne, Australia) and patients undergoing hip replacement at St Vincent’s Public Hospital or St Vincent’s Private Hospital (East Melbourne, Australia), respectively15. All experiments were following informed consent and approved by the ethics committee of each respective hospital and written consent was obtained from all subjects.

Human CD34+ cell isolation

Low-density MNC were isolated from human CB or BM by discontinuous density centrifugation using Ficoll-Hypaque (1.077 g ml−1, Pharmacia Biotech, Sweden). Lineage-negative cells were then isolated using mouse-anti-human CD3, CD11b, CD14, CD16, CD20, CD24 and CD235a (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), and Dynal sheep anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (IgG) beads (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Cells were then stained with CD34-FITC and CD38-PE (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) for subsequent fluorescence-activated cell separation15,16. All antibodies were used at optimal pre-titred concentrations (Supplementary Table 2).

Murine hematopoietic cell isolation

For the isolation of murine central marrow, the ends of femurs, tibias and iliac crests were removed and the bones flushed using a 21- or 23-gauge needle. For the isolation of endosteal cells, the marrow-depleted bones and the bone ends were ground in a mortar and pestle. The bone fragments were washed, incubated in 3 mg ml−1 Collagenase I (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) and 4 mg ml−1 Dispase II (Worthington, Lakewood, NJ), in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; 310 mOsm) in a shaking incubator (37 °C; 250 r.p.m. for 5 min), then washed by vigorously shaking66. RBC in collected PB were lysed using NH4Cl lysis buffer for 5 min at room temperature.

Generation of humanized NSG mice

Humanized NSG mice were generated by transplanting sorted CB CD34+ cells (1.5–2.0 × 105) with 2 × 106 irradiated (15 Gy) CB MNC. After 4 weeks, PB was assessed for the proportion of human CD45+ cells using anti-huCD45 and muCD45 antibodies.

Cell lines

LN18 and Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells were obtained from the ATCC. α4β1 and α9β1 expressing human LN18 cells were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine and 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS)21. CHO cells overexpressing murine α9 and α4 were generated by retroviral transduction using pMSCV-mα9-IRES-eGFP and pMSCV-mα4-IRES-eGFP16, and maintained in DMEM/F-12 medium supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine and 10% FBS.

Flow cytometry

Flow cytometric analysis was performed using an LSR II (BD Biosciences)16. R-BC154 was detected at either 582 or 610 nm and excited with the yellow-green laser (561 nm). For BM and PB analysis cells were analysed at 10–20,000 cells per s. Cell sorting was performed on a Cytopeia Influx (BD)16. All sorts were re-analysed with a purity of >98%.

Antibody cocktails

For analysis of human WBC from CB MNC or BM and PB from huNSG mice, cells were processed as described above and immunolabelled with anti-huCD34 and anti-huCD38 antibodies. For analysis of huNSG mice, anti-huCD45 and anti-muCD45 antibodies were also included. For analysis of murine progenitor cells (LSK; LineageSca-1+c-kit+) and HSC (LSKSLAM; LSKCD150+CD48), BM and PB cells were immunolabelled with a lineage cocktail (anti-B220, anti-CD3, anti-Gr-1, anti-Mac-1), anti-Sca-1, anti-c-kit, anti-CD48 and anti-CD150 antibodies. For lineage analysis, cells were stained with anti-CD3, anti-B220, anti-Mac-1 and anti-Gr-1 antibodies. A full list of antibodies and their working concentrations used in this work is detailed in Supplementary Tables 1 and 2.

Expression of α4 and α9β1 integrins on human HSC

The expression of human α4 (CD49d) and α9β1 on human HSC from CD34+ enriched human BM cells, BM from huNSG mice and CB MNC CD34+ cells were assessed by the sequential labelling of cells with purified mouse-anti-human α9β1, goat-anti-mouse-AF647 followed by a cocktail of mouse-anti-huCD49d-PECy7, anti-huCD34-FITC and anti-huCD38-BV421. Matching mouse IgG1 isotypes were used as controls.

In vitro and in vivo R-BC154 binding

For in vitro labelling experiments, up to 5 × 106 BM cells from C57 mice, conditional α4−/−9−/− vav-cre mice, huNSG, CB MNC and sorted CD34+ cells, were treated with R-BC154 (up to 300 nM) in PBS (0.5% BSA) or TBS (0.5% BSA) containing no exogenous cations or 1 mM CaCl2/MgCl2. In vitro labelling experiments were not conducted using Mn2+ in the binding buffer as BIO5192 has previously been shown to exhibit low levels of binding to α9β1 under these conditions23. R-BC154 staining in the presence of 10 mM EDTA was used as the negative control. For in vivo experiments, C57BL/6 and huNSG mice received subcutaneous injections of R-BC154 (5–10 mg kg−1) at 100 μl per 10 gm mouse weight and PB and BM analysed as described above. For competitive displacement of in situ-bound R-BC154, WBM cells were treated with 500 nM BOP in PBS containing 0.5% BSA and 1 mM CaCl2/MgCl2 for 45 min at 37 °C before flow cytometric analysis.

Determination of α9β1 contribution to R-BC154 binding

For the assessment of α9β1 contribution to R-BC154 binding, human and murine cells were stained with R-BC154 (100 nM) in the absence of competing antagonist or in the presence of excess amounts of the selective α4β1 antagonist BIO5192 (1 μM) or dual α4β19β1 antagonist BOP (1 μM) in PBS containing 0.5% BSA and 1 mM CaCl2/MgCl2 at 0 °C for 30 min. Cells were washed, immunolabelled as described above and analysed by flow cytometry. The contribution of α9β1 binding was calculated by measuring the difference in MFI between R-BC154+BIO5192 and R-BC154+BOP and expressed as a % of R-BC154 alone. Transduced LN18 cells and CHO cells incubated under identical conditions were used as controls, which confirmed BIO5192 inhibited >95% of R-BC154 binding to α4β1 but did not inhibit binding to α9β1. In contrast, BOP inhibited >95% of R-BC154 binding to both α4β1 and α9β1. For single-cell correlation analysis, scaled fluorescence intensity values for both R-BC154 binding to α9β1 in the presence of BIO5192 (to prevent any binding to α4β1) and α9β1 parameters were determined for individual CD34+CD38 cells using FlowJo X. Linear regression analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism.

Measurement of calcium gradients in BM

Sample preparation. C57BL/6 mice were perfusion fixed with 4% PFA, femurs excised and infiltrated and embedded in methacrylate as per the manufacturer’s instructions (JB-4 Plus embedding kit, ProSciTech, Australia). Sections (15 μm) of diaphyseal BM were cut using a tungsten carbide knife and transferred onto 10 × 10 mm silicon nitride (Si) windows (4 mm2 window size and 2 μm thickness; Melbourne Centre for Nanofabrication, Australia). Sections were dried and stored in a dehumidified environment before XFM analysis.

X-ray fluorescence microscopy. Specimens were analysed using the XFM beamline at the Australian Synchrotron67. Unlike full-field imaging common in optical microscopy, XFM is a scanning probe technique where the sample is translated through a focused beam of incident radiation. A beam of 12.7 keV X-rays was focused to a spot of 2.5 μm (full-width at half-maximum of the intensity) using a Kirkpatrick-Baez mirror pair. Using these settings, the intensity profile at the focal plane is a Gaussian distribution68 with a s.d. of 1.06 μm. The proportion of incident light which would illuminate from bone at a distance of 20 μm is determined as 10−81, excluding any possible signal contamination from the high levels of bone Ca. Nevertheless, analysis of calcium content directly at the bone/BM interface (0–20 μm from bone; shaded area in Fig. 2h) was avoided and quantitation of calcium was restricted to >20 μm from the bone surface. We have previously arbitrarily defined the interface between endosteal and central BM as 12 cell diameters (or 100 μm) from the bone surface13.

The X-ray energy was chosen to induce K-shell ionization of elements with atomic numbers below 34 (Z<Se). The specimen was continuously scanned through the focus using a virtual pixel size of 2 μm, well matched to the beam profile. Full x-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectral images were obtained at each pixel using an effective dwell time of 31.25 ms. The low-latency, large solid angle 384-channel Maia XRF detector was positioned in the back-scatter geometry and the resulting elemental maps ranged up to 142,129 pixels in size. Quantification using the Maia system is based on a fundamental parameter approach able to operate in real time and has no requirement for explicit per-element calibration69,70. Two single element foils, Mn and Pt (Micromatter, Canada), were scanned during the experiment and provided sufficient information for use as experimental references to establish elemental quantitation. Deconvolution of the X-ray fluorescence spectra was performed using GeoPIXE v6.3 (ref. 69; CSIRO, Australia) and calibrated using the metal foil measurements. Images were analysed using ImageJ and the relative calcium content quantified by measuring the pixel intensities from lines of interest (n=10) extending from the endosteum towards the central vein.

ICP-MS analysis of BM calcium, magnesium and manganese

Femurs, tibias and iliac crests (3 mice pooled per group, n=3) were excised, the epi- and metaphyseal regions removed and the bones flushed with a total of 1.2 ml of cation-free PBS to obtain central BM cellular fractions. The endosteal cellular fraction was harvested by gently grinding the flushed bones, and epi- and metaphyseal fragments in a small mortar and pestle using a total of 1.2 ml of PBS. This level of grinding has previously been demonstrated not to impact cell viability or function14,29.

The extracellular fractions were collected in the supernatant following cell centrifugation. To control for the grinding ‘selectively contaminating’ the eBM samples, bones were flushed in PBS to remove central marrow cells, then flushed and incubated in 3 mg per ml collagenase I and 4 mg per ml dispase II to release the residual-bound cells and proteins as per routine endosteal marrow isolation procedure, followed by further flushing with PBS. The empty bones were then vigorously ground in 0.5 ml PBS and the released cation concentrations were measured. This grinding was significantly more intensive than that which is normally used to release endosteal cells.

To separate the cell-associated cations into membrane-associated and intracellular fractions, half of the cell pellets were treated with 10 mM EDTA to remove any membrane-associated cations. All cell pellets were then frozen at −80 °C, freeze dried and digested with 50 μl of concentrated nitric acid 65% (Suprapur, Merck) overnight at room temperature followed by heating at 90 °C for 20 min to complete the digestion. The reduced volume after digestion was 35 μl and each sample was made up to 1 ml by the addition of 965 μl of 1% (v/v) of nitric acid diluent. The central and endosteal supernatants were centrifuged at 10,000g to remove any residual cellular debris and a 100 μl aliquot diluted 10-fold with 1% (v/v) nitric acid diluent. ICP-MS measurements were obtained on an Agilent 7700 series ICP-MS instrument under routine multi-element operating conditions using a Helium Reaction Gas Cell. The instrument was calibrated using 0, 5, 10, 50, 100 and 500 p.p.b. of certified multi- element ICP-MS standard calibration solutions (ICP-MS-CAL2-1, ICP-MS-CAL-3 and ICP-MS-CAL-4, Accustandard) for a range of elements. A certified internal standard solution containing 200 p.p.b. of Yttrium (Y89) was used as an internal control (ICP-MS-IS-MIX1-1, Accustandard). Results were calculated as micrograms of metal per gram of wet weight (μg g−1) or μmol l−1 for the cellular fraction and extracellular fraction, respectively, and then normalized to micrograms of metal per two hindlimbs or cell number, respectively.

HSC mobilization

Mice received subcutaneous injections at 100 μl per 10 gm body weight of: a single injection of BOP (up to 15 mg kg−1) for various timeframes, a single BIO5192 injection at 1 mg kg−1 for 1 h, a single AMD3100 injection at 3 mg kg−1 for 1 h (mice also receiving BOP or BIO5192 were injected with a single dose of BOP or BIO5192 1 h before harvest), or G-CSF at 250 μg kg−1 twice daily (500 μg kg−1 day−1), 6–8 h apart for 4 consecutive days (mice also receiving BOP and/or AMD3100 were injected with a single dose of BOP and/or AMD3100 1 h before harvest). Control mice received an equivalent volume of saline or 10% HPβCD/saline where appropriate.

Long-term transplant assays

Limiting dilution transplants. RFP mice were treated with either BOP, AMD3100 or a combination of BOP and AMD3100 and PB harvested after 1 h. Equal volumes of PB from each donor from each treatment group was pooled, red cells lysed and WBC resuspended in 200 μl PBS per recipient. Irradiated WBM filler cells were added and then resuspended in PBS for transplantation by tail vein injection. Multi-lineage RFP engraftment was assessed at 6, 12 and 20 weeks post transplant.

Competitive limiting dilution transplants. RFP and GFP mice were treated with BOP+AMD3100 and G-CSF, respectively, before PB was harvested and equivalent blood volumes pooled within each treatment group. Red cells were lysed and equal volumes (based on original pre-lysed blood volume) of RFP and GFP PB were transplanted with irradiated WBM filler cells in 200 μl per recipient. RFP and GFP engraftment assessed after 6, 12 and 20 weeks. After 20 weeks WBM cells (1/10th of a femur) from individual primary recipients (n=5) were transplanted into irradiated C57 secondary recipients (n=4 per primary recipient) and assessed for multi-lineage engraftment after 6, 12 and 20 weeks. Greater than 1% B220+, CD3+ and Gr1Mac1+ donor engraftment was considered multi-lineage.

Statistical analysis

Data were analysed using unpaired or paired student’s t-test or one-way analysis of variance where appropriate. If the difference between group means was statistically significant, post hoc analysis using the Tukey approach was performed. For determination of stem cell repopulation frequency, Poisson analysis using L-CALC software (Stem Cell Technologies) was used. A log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test was used to compare survival curves. P<0.05 was considered significant.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Cao, B. et al. Therapeutic targeting and rapid mobilization of endosteal HSC using a small molecule integrin antagonist. Nat. Commun. 7:11007 doi: 10.1038/ncomms11007 (2016).

References

  1. Petit, I. et al. G-CSF induces stem cell mobilization by decreasing bone marrow SDF-1 and up-regulating CXCR4. Nat. Immunol. 3, 687–694 (2002) .

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Levesque, J. P., Hendy, J., Takamatsu, Y., Simmons, P. J. & Bendall, L. J. Disruption of the CXCR4/CXCL12 chemotactic interaction during hematopoietic stem cell mobilization induced by GCSF or cyclophosphamide. J. Clin. Invest. 111, 187–196 (2003) .

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Winkler, I. G. et al. Hematopoietic stem cell mobilizing agents G-CSF, cyclophosphamide or AMD3100 have distinct mechanisms of action on bone marrow HSC niches and bone formation. Leukemia 26, 1594–1601 (2012) .

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cashen, A. F., Lazarus, H. M. & Devine, S. M. Mobilizing stem cells from normal donors: is it possible to improve upon G-CSF? Bone Marrow Transplant. 39, 577–588 (2007) .

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gertz, M. A. Current status of stem cell mobilization. Br. J. Haematol. 150, 647–662 (2010) .

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ramirez, P. et al. BIO5192, a small molecule inhibitor of VLA-4, mobilizes hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Blood 114, 1340–1343 (2009) .

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang, J. et al. Small molecule Me6TREN mobilizes hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells by activating MMP-9 expression and disrupting SDF-1/CXCR4 axis. Blood 123, 428–441 (2014) .

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Liles, W. C. et al. Mobilization of hematopoietic progenitor cells in healthy volunteers by AMD3100, a CXCR4 antagonist. Blood 102, 2728–2730 (2003) .

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Broxmeyer, H. E. et al. Rapid mobilization of murine and human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells with AMD3100, a CXCR4 antagonist. J. Exp. Med. 201, 1307–1318 (2005) .

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Adams, G. B. & Scadden, D. T. The hematopoietic stem cell in its place. Nat. Immunol. 7, 333–337 (2006) .

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kiel, M. J. & Morrison, S. J. Uncertainty in the niches that maintain haematopoietic stem cells. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 8, 290–301 (2008) .

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Morrison, S. J. & Scadden, D. T. The bone marrow niche for haematopoietic stem cells. Nature 505, 327–334 (2014) .

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Nilsson, S. K., Dooner, M. S., Tiarks, C. Y., Weier, H.-U. G. & Quesenberry, P. J. Potential and distribution of transplanted hematopoietic stem cells in a nonablated mouse model. Blood 89, 4013–4020 (1997) .

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Grassinger, J., Haylock, D. N., Williams, B., Olsen, G. H. & Nilsson, S. K. Phenotypically identical hemopoietic stem cells isolated from different regions of bone marrow have different biologic potential. Blood 116, 3185–3196 (2010) .

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nilsson, S. K. et al. Osteopontin, a key component of the hematopoietic stem cell niche and regulator of primitive hematopoietic progenitor cells. Blood 106, 1232–1239 (2005) .

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Grassinger, J. et al. Thrombin-cleaved osteopontin regulates hemopoietic stem and progenitor cell functions through interactions with alpha9beta1 and alpha4beta1 integrins. Blood 114, 49–59 (2009) .

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Papayannopoulou, T., Priestley, G. V. & Nakamoto, B. Anti-VLA4/VCAM-1 induced mobilization requires cooperative signaling through the kit/mkit ligand pathway. Blood 97, 2231–2239 (1998) .

    Google Scholar 

  18. Papayannopoulou, T. & Nakamoto, B. Peripheralization of hematopoietic progenitors in primates treated with Anti-Vla4 integrin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 90, 9374–9378 (1993) .

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Craddock, C. F., Nakamoto, B., Andrews, R. G., Priestley, G. V. & Papayannopoulou, T. Antibodies to VLA4 integrin mobilize long-term repopulating cells and augment cytokine-induced mobilization in primates and mice. Blood 90, 4779–4788 (1997) .

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hoggatt, J. et al. Differential stem- and progenitor-cell trafficking by prostaglandin E-2. Nature 495, 365–369 (2013) .

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Cao, B. et al. Design, synthesis and binding properties of a fluorescent alpha(9)beta(1)/alpha(4)beta(1) integrin antagonist and its application as an in vivo probe for bone marrow haemopoietic stem cells. Org. Biomol. Chem. 12, 965–978 (2014) .

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pepinsky, R. B. et al. Comparative assessment of the ligand and metal ion binding properties of integrins alpha 9 beta 1 and alpha 4 beta 1. Biochemistry 41, 7125–7141 (2002) .

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Leone, D. R. et al. An assessment of the mechanistic differences between two integrin alpha(4)beta(1) inhibitors, the monoclonal antibody TA-2 and the small molecule BIO5192, in rat experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 305, 1150–1162 (2003) .

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Shultz, L. D., Brehm, M. A., Garcia-Martinez, J. V. & Greiner, D. L. Humanized mice for immune system investigation: progress, promise and challenges. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 12, 786–798 (2012) .

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Askari, J. A., Buckley, P. A., Mould, A. P. & Humphries, M. J. Linking integrin conformation to function. J. Cell Sci. 122, 165–170 (2009) .

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Liddington, R. C. & Ginsberg, M. H. Integrin activation takes shape. J. Cell Biol. 158, 833–839 (2002) .

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Chigaev, A. et al. Alpha(4)beta(1) integrin affinity changes govern cell adhesion. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 38174–38182 (2003) .

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ye, F., Kim, C. & Ginsberg, M. H. Reconstruction of integrin activation. Blood 119, 26–33 (2012) .

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Haylock, D. N. et al. Hemopoietic stem cells with higher hemopoietic potential reside at the bone marrow endosteum. Stem Cells 25, 1062–1069 (2007) .

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wilson, A. & Trumpp, A. Bone-marrow haematopoietic-stem-cell niches. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 6, 93–106 (2006) .

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Yin, T. & Li, L. The stem cell niches in bone. J. Clin. Invest. 116, 1195–1201 (2006) .

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Masumoto, A. & Hemler, M. E. Multiple activation states of Vla-4—mechanistic differences between adhesion to Cs1 fibronectin and to vascular cell-adhesion molecule-1. J. Biol. Chem. 268, 228–234 (1993) .

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lee, J. L. et al. Osteopontin promotes integrin activation through outside-in and inside-out mechanisms: OPN-CD44(v) interaction enhances survival in gastrointestinal cancer cells. Cancer Res. 67, 2089–2097 (2007) .

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Jakubowski, A., Rosa, M. D., Bixler, S., Lobb, R. & Burkly, L. C. Vascular cell-adhesion molecule (Vcam)-Ig fusion protein defines distinct affinity states of the very late antigen-4 (Vla-4) receptor. Cell Adhes. Commun. 3, 131–142 (1995) .

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Levesque, J. P., Leavesley, D. I., Niutta, S., Vadas, M. & Simmons, P. J. Cytokines increase human hemopoietic cell adhesiveness by activation of very late antigen (VLA)-4 and VLA-5 integrins. J. Exp. Med. 181, 1805–1815 (1995) .

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kovach, N. L., Lin, N., Yednock, T., Harlan, J. M. & Broudy, V. C. Stem cell factor modulates avidity of a4b1 and a5b1 integrins expressed on hematopoietic cell lines. Blood 85, 159–167 (1995) .

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Bonig, H., Watts, K. L., Chang, K. H., Kiem, H. P. & Papayannopoulou, T. Concurrent blockade of alpha4-integrin and CXCR4 in hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell mobilization. Stem Cells 27, 836–837 (2009) .

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Rettig, M. P. et al. ALT-1188: a new CXCR4 antagonist in development for mobilization of HSPCs. Blood 122, 891 (2013) .

    Google Scholar 

  39. Herbert, K. E., Levesque, J. P., Haylock, D. N. & Prince, H. M. The use of experimental murine models to assess novel agents of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell mobilization. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 14, 603–621 (2008) .

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Velders, G. A. et al. Enhancement of G-CSF-induced stem cell mobilization by antibodies against the beta 2 integrins LFA-1 and Mac-1. Blood 100, 327–333 (2002) .

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Calandra, G. et al. AMD3100 plus G-CSF can successfully mobilize CD34+cells from non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, Hodgkin's disease and multiple myeloma patients previously failing mobilization with chemotherapy and/or cytokine treatment: compassionate use data. Bone Marrow Transplant. 41, 331–338 (2008) .

    MathSciNet  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Rettig, M. P., Ansstas, G. & DiPersio, J. F. Mobilization of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells using inhibitors of CXCR4 and VLA-4. Leukemia 26, 34–53 (2012) .

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Yeoh, J. S., Ausema, A., Wierenga, P., de Haan, G. & van Os, R. Mobilized peripheral blood stem cells provide rapid reconstitution but impaired long-term engraftment in a mouse model. Bone Marrow Transplant. 39, 401–409 (2007) .

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Ito, R., Takahashi, T., Katano, I. & Ito, M. Current advances in humanized mouse models. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 9, 208–214 (2012) .

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Bendall, L. J. & Bradstock, K. F. G-CSF: from granulopoietic stimulant to bone marrow stem cell mobilizing agent. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 25, 355–367 (2014) .

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Huang, Y. H. et al. Rapid mobilization of murine hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells with TG-0054, a novel CXCR4 antagonist. Blood 114, 1374–1375 (2009) .

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Schreiber, T. D. et al. The integrin α9β1 on hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells: involvement in cell adhesion, proliferation and differentiation. Haematologica 94, 1493–1501 (2009) .

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Chen, C. et al. The Integrin alpha9beta1 contributes to granulopoiesis by enhancing granulocyte colony-stimulating factor receptor signaling. Immunity 25, 895–906 (2006) .

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Flomenberg, N. et al. The use of AMD3100 plus G-CSF for autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization is superior to G-CSF alone. Blood 106, 1867–1874 (2005) .

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Schofield, R. The relationship between the spleen colony-forming cell and the haemopoietic stem cell. Blood Cells 4, 7–25 (1978) .

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Suda, T., Takubo, K. & Semenza, G. L. Metabolic regulation of hematopoietic stem cells in the hypoxic niche. Cell Stem Cell 9, 298–310 (2011) .

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Zhang, J. et al. Identification of the haematopoietic stem cell niche and control of the niche size. Nature 425, 836–841 (2003) .

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Calvi, L. M. et al. Osteoblastic cells regulate the haematopoietic stem cell niche. Nature 425, 841–846 (2003) .

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Kiel, M. J. et al. SLAM family receptors distinguish hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells and reveal endothelial niches for stem cells. Cell 121, 1109–1121 (2005) .

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Storan, M. J. et al. Brief report: factors released by megakaryocytes thrombin cleave osteopontin to negatively regulate hematopoietic stem cells. Stem Cells 33, 2351–2357 (2015) .

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Saltman, P. D. & Strause, L. G. The role of trace minerals in osteoporosis. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 12, 384–389 (1993) .

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Helliwell, T. R. et al. Elemental analysis of femoral bone from patients with fractured neck of femur or osteoarthrosis. Bone 18, 151–157 (1996) .

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Chen, L. L., Whitty, A., Lobb, R. R., Adams, S. P. & Pepinsky, R. B. Multiple activation states of integrin alpha(4)beta(1) detected through their different affinities for a small molecule ligand. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 13167–13175 (1999) .

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Adams, G. B. et al. Stem cell engraftment at the endosteal niche is specified by the calcium-sensing receptor. Nature 439, 599–603 (2006) .

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Adams, G. B. et al. Therapeutic targeting of a stem cell niche. Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 238–243 (2007) .

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Lane, S. W., Williams, D. A. & Watt, F. M. Modulating the stem cell niche for tissue regeneration. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 795–803 (2014) .

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Morrison, S. J., Wright, D. E. & Weissman, I. L. Cyclophosphamide/granulocyte colony-stimulating factor induces hematopoietic stem cells to proliferate prior to mobilization. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 1908–1913 (1997) .

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Grassinger, J., Williams, B., Olsen, G. H., Haylock, D. N. & Nilsson, S. K. Granulocyte colony stimulating factor expands hematopoietic stem cells within the central but not endosteal bone marrow region. Cytokine 58, 218–225 (2012) .

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Hess, D. A. et al. Human progenitor cells rapidly mobilized by AMD3100 repopulate NOD/SCID mice with increased frequency in comparison to cells from the same donor mobilized by granulocyte colony stimulating factor. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 13, 398–411 (2007) .

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. To, L. B., Levesque, J. P. & Herbert, K. E. How I treat patients who mobilize hematopoietic stem cells poorly. Blood 118, 4530–4540 (2011) .

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Grassinger, J. & Nilsson, S. K. Methods to analyze the homing efficiency and spatial distribution of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells and their relationship to the bone marrow endosteum and vascular endothelium. Methods Mol. Biol. 750, 197–214 (2011) .

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Paterson, D. et al. The X-ray fluorescence microscopy beamline at the Australian synchrotron. AIP Conf. Proc. 1365, 219–222 (2011) .

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Dimmock, M. R. et al. Validation of a Geant4 model of the X-ray fluorescence microprobe at the Australian synchrotron. J. Synchrotron Rad 22, 354–365 (2015) .

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Ryan, C. G. et al. Nuclear microprobe—synchrotron synergy: towards integrated quantitative real-time elemental imaging using PIXE and SXRF. Nucl. Instum. Methods Phys. Res. B 231, 183–188 (2005) .

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. de Boer, D. K. G., Borstrok, J. J. M., Leenaers, A. J. G., van Sprang, H. A. & Brouwer, P. N. How accurate is the fundamental paramater approach? XRF analysis of bulk and multilayer samples. X-ray Spectrom. 22, 33–38 (1993) .

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Dani Cardozo and Jessica Hatwell-Humble for animal assistance and Andrea Reitsma and Cheang Be for technical assistance. We acknowledge Paul Savage, David Haylock, Shen Heazlewood, Ana Oteiza and Oliver Hutt for their intellectual input, figure design and assistance in the original synthesis of the compounds. We acknowledge Dean Sheppard for the provision of the α9flox/flox mice, Warren Alexander for the provision of the vav-cre mice and Patrick Tam for the provision of RFP mice. We acknowledge Irene Volitakis for ICP-MS, Wioleta Kowalczyk for HPLC and FlowCore (Monash University) for flow cytometry services. This work was undertaken in part on the X-ray Fluorescence Microscopy beamline at the Australian Synchrotron, Victoria, Australia. This research was supported by the Science and Industry Endowment Fund, an ARC Future Fellowship and a CSIRO OCE Science Leader Fellowship to SKN and a CSIRO OCE post-doctoral fellowship to BC. The Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute is supported by grants from the State Government of Victoria and the Australian Government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

B.C., Z.Z., J.G., B.W., S.L. and S.K.N. designed and performed experiments. B.C., C.H., Q.I.C. and S.A.J. conducted XFM studies. T.P. provided essential reagents. B.C. and S.K.N. analysed the data and wrote the manuscript. B.C. conducted the chemical synthesis. All authors critically reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan K. Nilsson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures 1-4 and Supplementary Tables 1-2 (PDF 1036 kb)

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cao, B., Zhang, Z., Grassinger, J. et al. Therapeutic targeting and rapid mobilization of endosteal HSC using a small molecule integrin antagonist. Nat Commun 7, 11007 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11007

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11007

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing