Biologists have long been fascinated by the amazing diversity of animal colour patterns. Despite much interest, the underlying evolutionary and developmental mechanisms contributing to their rich variety remain largely unknown, especially the vivid and complex colour patterns seen in vertebrates. Here, we show that complex and camouflaged animal markings can be formed by the 'blending' of simple colour patterns. A mathematical model predicts that crossing between animals having inverted spot patterns (for example, 'light spots on a dark background' and 'dark spots on a light background') will necessarily result in hybrid offspring that have camouflaged labyrinthine patterns as 'blended' intermediate phenotypes. We confirmed the broad applicability of the model prediction by empirical examination of natural and artificial hybrids of salmonid fish. Our results suggest an unexplored evolutionary process by means of 'pattern blending', as one of the possible mechanisms underlying colour pattern diversity and hybrid speciation.
Animals have various colour patterns on their body surfaces, providing vivid examples of the enormous biodiversity1,2. Recent studies have revealed the evolutionary and developmental mechanisms underlying the diversity in some colour patterns, such as black spots on insect wings3,4. These spot patterns seem to be formed from genetically encoded blueprints: spatially restricted expression of certain genes that are controlled by multiple cis-regulatory elements4,5. Thus, these patterns can be thought of as 'fixed' traits within each species, and, therefore, a hybrid offspring between species that have different spot patterns will have a superimposed image of the parent patterns6 as a natural consequence of the 'sum' of two different cis-regulatory element sets from both parents.
On the other hand, some other colour patterns observed in nature (especially of vertebrates) seem to be more complicated and 'flexible'. For example, the markings of leopards or whale sharks are not fixed within species but rather specific to each individual: the exact position of each spot or stripe is variable and there are subtle differences within a species, or even between the left and right sides of an individual. Moreover, colour patterns of some animals are dynamically and autonomously rearranged to resolve pattern inconsistency caused by body growth or artificial disturbance7,8, indicating the flexible property of underlying mechanisms.
Multiple different factors have been identified that affect such 'flexible' colour patterns9,10, indicating the potentially quantitative nature of these traits. As for quantitative traits, hybrid offspring generally have intermediate phenotypes, which can be readily predicted if the traits are defined and measured as one-dimensional morphological variables (for example, length and/or number of body parts11,12, overall colour tone of the body13). However, it is unclear whether the flexible two-dimensional colour patterns also produce intermediate forms, and, if so, what pattern is the precise 'intermediate' between similar but different colourations, such as 'white spots on a black background' and 'black spots on a white background'.
So far, many attempts have been made to reproduce flexible colour patterns in animals by using mathematical modelling. Among them, a specific class of reaction-diffusion (RD) systems14 have been frequently used, which can account for many complex biological patterns15,16 on the basis of a simple rule: local self-activation and long-ranging inhibition17. The RD model also provided an unexpected prediction for the dynamic processes of colour pattern rearrangement on actual animals7,8, implying that it captures the very essence of the flexible colour pattern formation mechanisms. Here, we use the RD model for an 'in silico hybridization' experiment to explore the possible intermediate forms of the flexible two-dimensional traits, and demonstrate that, supported by the examination of actual hybrid animals, a complex and camouflaged pattern can be formed by 'blending' a set of simple spot patterns.
In silico hybridization predicts camouflaged colour patterns
By the gradual modulation of a certain parameter in the RD model equations, various two-dimensional patterns can be reproduced, including spot patterns and inverse spot patterns (Fig. 1). Assuming that one continuous parameter is determined by multiple 'genetic loci' (that is, polygenic inheritance) and that any 'individuals' having different parameter values can be 'crossed' with each other, the resultant 'hybrid' will have a parameter value that is intermediate between those of the 'parents'. On the basis of the simulation results, we focused on the following point: regardless of the model equations and parameters chosen for the simulation, if there are two parameter regions that yield spot and inverse spot patterns, an intermediate region must exist in which camouflaged 'labyrinthine' patterns will arise (Fig. 1). This type of pattern transition has been well recognized among theorists15, and when this is applied to the biological context, the following non-trivial prediction can be derived: if an animal having 'light spots on a dark background' is crossed with another animal having 'dark spots on a light background', the resultant hybrid offspring will necessarily have 'labyrinthine' patterns.
To test this prediction, we investigated the colour patterns of actual hybrid animals. The white-spotted charr (Salvelinus leucomaenis) and masu salmon (Oncorhynchus masou masou) are both salmonid fish with fluvial forms (as well as sea-run forms) seen in Japanese rivers. The former has light spots and the latter has dark spots on the sides of their bodies (Fig. 2a,b). They usually live in different habitats (the former lives more upstream), yet natural hybridization occasionally occurs between these species18. We observed natural and artificial hybrid individuals, all of which showed peculiar vermiculated stripe patterns, or labyrinthine patterns, in very good accordance with the simulation results (Fig. 2c,d).
Colour pattern dynamics in multidimensional trait space
In the model organism zebrafish, multiple factors have been identified that affect their stripe colour pattern in different ways9,10,19,20,21,22. The in silico hybridization can also be extended naturally to a multidimensional parameter space, in which multiple parameters of a model can be manipulated simultaneously, but independently (Fig. 3). In this situation, pattern modification caused by a change in one parameter could be largely compensated for by other parameters. For instance, in the two-dimensional parameter space depicted in Figure 3a, a change in the pattern because of the shift of parameter A (point P to P′) can be cancelled out by the counteractive shift of parameter C (point P′ to Q), which results in similar black spot patterns (P and Q). Under such conditions, the similarity or identity of colour pattern phenotypes does not necessarily imply the complete concordance of underlying parameter sets. On the contrary, in the case of actual animals, it is reasonable to expect certain differences in the 'parameter sets' (or genotypes) between different species, even though they have similar patterns (for example, W1 versus W2 and B1 versus B2 in Fig. 3a). However, from the in silico hybridization, we also predicted that any combination between 'white spots' and 'black spots' species, regardless of the underlying parameter sets, would always give birth to hybrid offspring with labyrinthine patterns (Fig. 3a, L1–4). In contrast, crossing within 'white spots' species or within 'black spots' species would never cause major changes in the colour patterns of their progeny (Fig. 3a, W3 and B3). Similar results can also be obtained with other parameter sets or models (Fig. 3b–e).
Evidence supporting these predictions was found in earlier studies. In the 1970s, Suzuki and Fukuda23 conducted a comprehensive and exhaustive analysis of artificial hybridizations among salmonid fish (62 heterologous combinations in total), aiming to develop suitable hybrid species for inland fish farming. We reexamined their data, focusing on the colour patterns of the hybrids (Fig. 4). According to their experiments, viable interspecific hybrids within the genus Salvelinus (2 combinations, 30 individuals each) showed 'light spots on dark background', as seen in their parents (Fig. 4a), and interspecific and intergeneric hybrids of the genera Oncorhynchus and Salmo (4 combinations, 11–30 individuals each) showed 'dark spots on light background', similar to their parents (Fig. 4d). On the other hand, all viable intergeneric hybrids between Salvelinus (light spots) and Oncorhynchus or Salmo (dark spots) (8 combinations, 12–30 individuals each) exhibited labyrinthine colour patterns (Fig. 4b,c). Compared with the simple spot patterns of the parent species, the labyrinthine patterns of the hybrids showed higher complexity in their shape, although they are intermediate in their overall colour tone (Fig. 4e). The same or similar examples have also been repeatedly reported among Japanese and North American species of the family Salmonidae18,24,25. All these observations are entirely consistent with our predictions derived from the 'in silico hybridization' using RD models (Fig. 4e).
We showed theoretically and empirically that camouflaged labyrinthine patterns can be formed by the 'blending' of simple spot patterns. Besides the salmonid hybrids, many organisms have labyrinthine patterns in nature (particularly among teleosts), and some of them are closely related to other species with spot/inverse spot patterns (for example, vermiculated spinefoot, Siganus vermiculatus and marine pufferfish, Takifugu exascurus). We speculate that at least some of the organisms with labyrinthine patterns may have resulted from the 'pattern blending' mechanism proposed here. Several cases have been reported in which previously recognized distinct species of marine fish were later identified as the F1 hybrid of other species26. Ongoing advances in comparative genomics of marine species may accelerate the detection of more such hybrids.
Furthermore, we considered another possibility that labyrinthine organisms may have evolved as species of hybrid origins, rather than be mere F1 hybrids. Accumulating evidence indicates that natural hybridization can contribute to the evolutionary process of animal speciation6,27,28,29,30,31. The labyrinthine phenotype we described here may be another conspicuous example of such cases, which fulfils the requirements for hybrid speciation. The complex and camouflaged pattern differs markedly from either pattern of the parent species and therefore is possibly more advantageous in some environments. This means that a natural 'intermediate' state of a two-dimensional quantitative trait can coincidentally represent a 'transgressive' phenotype, even without any special genetic mechanisms (a novel mode of 'transgressive segregation'32). At the same time, animal markings are known to be frequently used as visual cues for species recognition and mate choice33,34, including the form of assortative preferences6. In cases in which colour patterns (but not mere colour) are critically involved in assortative mating, a group of individuals with the same or similar 'blended' patterns will be prezygotically isolated from the parent species; thus, they may evolve as a distinct lineage of hybrid origin.
For a comprehensive appreciation of biodiversity, animal colour patterns are undoubtedly one of the most attractive targets. Further understanding of their diversity requires detailed analyses of the molecular and cellular mechanisms of the pattern formation processes. Comparative genomic studies among related species with divergent colourations35,36 will also have an important role. In addition, the 'pattern blending' model we proposed here may provide a platform for the integrated understanding of the flexible (and often reticulated) patterns on animal body surfaces and their (possibly reticulate) evolutionary processes.
Equations used for RD systems14 can be generally described as
where u and v are the concentrations of hypothetical factors, f and g are the reaction kinetics and Du and Dv are the hypothetical diffusion coefficients (or their mathematical equivalents) for u and v, respectively15,37. The reaction rate R was introduced for convenience of parameter adjustment. The reaction kinetics and parameters used for each simulation are as follows:
The linear model:14
where A=0.08 (Fig. 1), B=0.08, D=0.03, E=0.10, F=0.12, G=0.06, Du=0.5 (Fig. 1) and 1.0 (Fig. 3), Dv=10.0 (Fig. 1) and 20.0 (Fig. 3), R=20.0, and the lower and upper limits for the synthesis rates of u (Au+Bv+C) and v (Eu−F) are set as
where synUmax=0.23 and synVmax=0.50.
The Gierer–Meinhardt model:17
The Gray–Scott model:38
Simulations were carried out on two-dimensional square grids (Fig. 3) or on evenly distributed cells on a sphere (Fig. 1). The field sizes were 1,024×1,024 (Fig. 3), 128×128 (Fig. 3a insets) and 20,000 cells (Fig. 1). The initial conditions included random patterns of u and v. The Neumann boundary condition was used in Figure 3, and periodic boundary condition in Figure 3a insets. The time step for all simulations was set as dt=0.01. Calculations were performed with 20,000 (Fig. 1, the linear model and the Gierer–Meinhardt model), 50,000 (Fig. 3a,b,e), 80,000 (Fig. 3c,d) and 100,000 (Fig. 1, the Gray–Scott model) iterations. The POV-Ray is a computer program. was used for rendering (Fig. 1). Fortran and MATLAB codes are available from the authors on request.
Natural and artificial hybrids of salmonid fish
All animal experiments were conducted in accordance with the institutional guidelines of Osaka University and Sapporo Salmon Museum. A specimen of a natural hybrid of salmonid fish was collected in 2005 from Teine, Sapporo. The external characters of the hybrid specimen were intermediate between those of the two native salmonids, S. leucomaenis and O. masou masou. Artificial hybridization between S. leucomaenis and O. masou masou was conducted in 2006 at the Sapporo Salmon Museum, Sapporo. Eggs were stripped from two S. leucomaenis females and mixed with sperm obtained from two O. masou masou males. Water temperature was maintained at about 10 °C. Hybrids were observed 33 months after hatching. Crossing between female O. masou masou and male S. leucomaenis was unsuccessful, as reported previously39.
Quantification of colour patterns
Colour pattern complexity and overall tone were quantified from binarized images using the OpenCV library. The pattern simplicity score (PSS) is defined as the area-weighted mean isoperimetric quotient of the contours extracted from each image:
where is the isoperimetric quotient (or circularity) of each contour, is the area weight, Si and Li are the area and the perimeter of each contour, respectively. The overall colour tone of a pattern is defined and calculated as the ratio of unpigmented area (white pixels in the binarized image).
How to cite this article: Miyazawa, S. et al. Blending of animal colour patterns by hybridization. Nat. Commun. 1:66 doi: 10.1038/1071 (2010).
Murray, J. D. How the leopard gets its spots. Sci. Am. 258, 80–87 (1988).
Carroll, S. B. Endless Forms Most Beautiful (W.W. Norton, 2005).
Gompel, N., Prud'homme, B., Wittkopp, P. J., Kassner, V. A. & Carroll, S. B. Chance caught on the wing: cis-regulatory evolution and the origin of pigment patterns in Drosophila. Nature 433, 481–487 (2005).
Werner, T., Koshikawa, S., Williams, T. M. & Carroll, S. B. Generation of a novel wing colour pattern by the wingless morphogen. Nature 464, 1143–1148 (2010).
Prud'homme, B., Gompel, N. & Carroll, S. B. Emerging principles of regulatory evolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 8605–8612 (2007).
Mavarez, J. et al. Speciation by hybridization in Heliconius butterflies. Nature 441, 868–871 (2006).
Kondo, S. & Asai, R. A reaction-diffusion wave on the skin of the marine angelfish Pomacanthus. Nature 376, 765–768 (1995).
Yamaguchi, M., Yoshimoto, E. & Kondo, S. Pattern regulation in the stripe of zebrafish suggests an underlying dynamic and autonomous mechanism. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 4790–4793 (2007).
Kelsh, R. N., Harris, M. L., Colanesi, S. & Erickson, C. A. Stripes and belly-spots–a review of pigment cell morphogenesis in vertebrates. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 20, 90–104 (2009).
Mills, M. G. & Patterson, L. B. Not just black and white: pigment pattern development and evolution in vertebrates. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 20, 72–81 (2009).
Hubbs, C. L. Hybridization between fish species in nature. Syst. Zool. 4, 1–20 (1955).
Grant, P. R. & Grant, B. R. Hybridization of bird species. Science 256, 193–197 (1992).
Steiner, C. C., Weber, J. N. & Hoekstra, H. E. Adaptive variation in beach mice produced by two interacting pigmentation genes. PLoS Biol. 5, e219 (2007).
Turing, A. M. The chemical basis of morphogenesis. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 237, 37–72 (1952).
Meinhardt, H. Models of Biological Pattern Formation (Academic Press, 1982).
Barrio, R. A. et al. Modeling the skin pattern of fishes. Phys. Rev. E 79, 031908 (2009).
Gierer, A. & Meinhardt, H. A theory of biological pattern formation. Kybernetik 12, 30–39 (1972).
Kato, K. Natural hybrids of salmonid fishes from the Nippara River, Tokyo. Jpn. J. Ichthyol. 23, 225–232 (1977).
Parichy, D. M. & Turner, J. M. Temporal and cellular requirements for Fms signaling during zebrafish adult pigment pattern development. Development 130, 817–833 (2003).
Iwashita, M. et al. Pigment pattern in jaguar/obelix zebrafish is caused by a Kir7.1 mutation: implications for the regulation of melanosome movement. PLoS Genet. 2, e197 (2006).
Watanabe, M. et al. Spot pattern of leopard danio is caused by mutation in the zebrafish connexin41.8 gene. EMBO Rep. 7, 893–897 (2006).
Lang, M. R., Patterson, L. B., Gordon, T. N., Johnson, S. L. & Parichy, D. M. Basonuclin-2 requirements for zebrafish adult pigment pattern development and female fertility. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000744 (2009).
Suzuki, R. & Fukuda, Y. Appearance and numerical characters of F1 hybrids among salmonid fishes. Bull. Freshwater Fish. Res. Lab. 23, 5–32 (1973).
Crossman, E. J. & Buss, K. Artificial hybrid between kokanee (Oncorhynchus nerka) and brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis). Copeia 2, 357–359 (1966).
Koizumi, I., Kobayashi, H., Maekawa, K., Azuma, N. & Nagase, T. Occurrence of a hybrid between endemic miyabe charr Salvelinus malma miyabei and introduced masu salmon Oncorhynchus masou masou in the Lake Shikaribetsu system, Hokkaido, Japan. Ichthyol. Res. 52, 83–85 (2005).
Pyle, R. L. & Randall, J. E. A review of hybridization in marine angelfishes (Perciformes: Pomacanthidae). Environ. Biol. Fish. 41, 127–145 (1994).
Arnold, M. L. Natural Hybridization and Evolution (Oxford University Press, 1997).
Mallet, J. Hybrid speciation. Nature 446, 279–283 (2007).
Schwarz, D., Matta, B. M., Shakir-Botteri, N. L. & Mcpheron, B. A. Host shift to an invasive plant triggers rapid animal hybrid speciation. Nature 436, 546–549 (2005).
Gompert, Z., Fordyce, J. A., Forister, M. L., Shapiro, A. M. & Nice, C. C. Homoploid hybrid speciation in an extreme habitat. Science 314, 1923–1925 (2006).
Meyer, A., Salzburger, W. & Schartl, M. Hybrid origin of a swordtail species (Teleostei: Xiphophorus clemenciae) driven by sexual selection. Mol. Ecol. 15, 721–730 (2006).
Rieseberg, L. H., Archer, M. A. & Wayne, R. K. Transgressive segregation adaptation, and speciation. Heredity 83, 363–372 (1999).
Houde, A. E. & Endler, J. A. Correlated evolution of female mating preferences and male color patterns in the guppy Poecilia reticulata. Science 248, 1405–1408 (1990).
Seehausen, O. et al. Speciation through sensory drive in cichlid fish. Nature 455, 620–626 (2008).
Parichy, D. M. Evolution of danio pigment pattern development. Heredity 97, 200–210 (2006).
Yamanoue, Y. et al. Explosive speciation of Takifugu: another use of fugu as a model system for evolutionary biology. Mol. Biol. Evol. 26, 623–629 (2009).
Murray, J. D. Mathematical Biology (Springer-Verlag, 2003).
Gray, P. & Scott, S. K. Autocatalytic reactions in the isothermal continuous stirred tank reactor. Chem. Eng. Sci. 39, 1087–1097 (1984).
Suzuki, R. & Fukuda, Y. Survival potential of F1 hybrids among salmonid fishes. Bull. Freshwater Fish. Res. Lab. 21, 69–83 (1971).
We thank M. Yamashin from the Sapporo Touun High School Biology Club for providing a natural hybrid specimen. We are grateful to R. Suzuki, M. Kikuchi, M. Yamaguchi and S. Hayashi for their valuable discussions and suggestions. This work was supported by Grant-in-Aid Genome Tokutei and Gakujutu-Sousei from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology and by the Uehara Memorial Foundation.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
About this article
Cite this article
Miyazawa, S., Okamoto, M. & Kondo, S. Blending of animal colour patterns by hybridization . Nat Commun 1, 66 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1071
Linking genotype, cell behavior, and phenotype: multidisciplinary perspectives with a basis in zebrafish patterns
Current Opinion in Genetics & Development (2020)
Developmental Biology (2020)
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2020)
Journal of Physics: Conference Series (2019)