Leptin is an adipocyte-secreted hormone, the circulating levels of which correlate closely with overall adiposity. Although rare mutations in the leptin (LEP) gene are well known to cause leptin deficiency and severe obesity, no common loci regulating circulating leptin levels have been uncovered. Therefore, we performed a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of circulating leptin levels from 32,161 individuals and followed up loci reaching P<10−6 in 19,979 additional individuals. We identify five loci robustly associated (P<5 × 10−8) with leptin levels in/near LEP, SLC32A1, GCKR, CCNL1 and FTO. Although the association of the FTO obesity locus with leptin levels is abolished by adjustment for BMI, associations of the four other loci are independent of adiposity. The GCKR locus was found associated with multiple metabolic traits in previous GWAS and the CCNL1 locus with birth weight. Knockdown experiments in mouse adipose tissue explants show convincing evidence for adipogenin, a regulator of adipocyte differentiation, as the novel causal gene in the SLC32A1 locus influencing leptin levels. Our findings provide novel insights into the regulation of leptin production by adipose tissue and open new avenues for examining the influence of variation in leptin levels on adiposity and metabolic health.
Leptin is an adipocyte-secreted hormone that influences long-term regulation of energy homeostasis by informing the brain about the amount of stored body fat1,2. Circulating leptin levels correlate closely with measures of adiposity, such as body fat mass and body mass index (BMI)3. Yet, at any given level of adiposity, there is substantial variation in circulating leptin levels4, of which estimated 30–50% is explained by genetic factors5,6,7.
Rare homozygous loss-of-function mutations in the leptin-encoding gene (LEP) cause leptin deficiency that leads to hyperphagia and severe obesity, which can be corrected by exogenous leptin administration8. Leptin-deficient children are born with a normal birth weight but exhibit rapid weight gain in the first few months of life. They show marked abnormalities of T-cell number and function, and have high rates of childhood infection9. Hypothalamic hypothyroidism is present, characterized by a low free thyroxine and high serum thyroid-stimulating hormone levels10. Pubertal development generally does not occur due to hypogonadotropic hypogonadism10. Individuals heterozygous for leptin mutations exhibit a partial leptin deficiency with higher body fat than control individuals11.
Candidate gene studies, typically small in size, have reported associations of two common variants (A19G (rs2167270, minor allele frequency (MAF) 35%) and G2548A (rs7799039, MAF 49%)) in the promoter or 5′-untranslated region of LEP with circulating leptin levels in the general population, but these results are inconclusive12,13,14,15,16. The same LEP variants have been studied for association with obesity, but a meta-analysis of the published results (nA19G=918 and nG2548A=2,174) found no evidence of such association17. Candidate gene studies of LEP were published before the human genome sequence was extensively characterized and are therefore restricted to the variants known at that time. Furthermore, although LEP is an obvious candidate, variants in other genes may also influence circulating leptin levels by regulating leptin production, secretion, clearance or response. Identification of such leptin-regulating genes could provide novel insights into mechanisms that regulate energy homeostasis and neuro-endocrine function1,2.
In this study, we sought to identify genetic loci associated with circulating leptin levels by a genome-wide meta-analysis. Given the strong correlation between leptin and adiposity, we also examined genome-wide associations with circulating leptin levels adjusted for BMI, to identify loci associated with leptin levels independent of BMI.
Stage 1 genome-wide meta-analysis in 32,161 individuals
We first performed a meta-analysis of the results from genome-wide associations between ∼2.5 million genotyped and HapMap-imputed single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and circulating leptin levels, including up to 32,161 individuals of European descent from 23 studies (Supplementary Table 1). After logarithmic transformation that normalized the distribution of leptin levels and adjusting for age and sex, we carried out association analyses within each study and subsequently meta-analysed the study-specific results. To identify loci associated with circulating leptin levels independently of adiposity, we performed a meta-analysis of genome-wide associations in which we additionally adjusted for BMI. We also performed secondary genome-wide meta-analyses in men (n=13,363) and women (n=18,698) separately, as women generally have higher leptin levels than men, primarily due to larger percentage of body fat and greater subcutaneous fat storage18.
Two loci, near the LEP and SLC32A1 genes, reached genome-wide significance (P<5 × 10−8) in the BMI-adjusted meta-analysis of men and women combined (Table 1). To confirm these associations and to identify additional leptin-associated loci, we took forward all independent (pairwise distance >500 kb and r2<0.1) SNPs reaching P<10−6 with leptin levels with or without adjustment for BMI in meta-analyses of all individuals combined, men only or women only, for follow-up in stage 2 (Supplementary Tables 2–4).
Stage 2 follow-up in 19,979 individuals identifies five loci
We examined the associations of the loci taken forward from stage 1 in up to 19,979 additional individuals of European descent from 13 studies (Supplementary Table 5). All studies performed the same association analyses as described in Stage 1; that is, with and without adjustment for BMI and in men and women combined, as well as separately. Finally, after performing a joint meta-analysis of the stage 1 and stage 2 results, five independent SNPs reached genome-wide significance (P<5 × 10−8) in the combined meta-analyses of men and women (Table 1). In the BMI-adjusted meta-analysis, we confirmed genome-wide significant associations for the loci near LEP and SLC32A1, and identified an additional locus in GCKR. In the BMI-unadjusted meta-analysis, we identified two additional loci near CCNL1 and in FTO. A locus in COBLL1, previously identified for association with BMI-adjusted waist–hip ratio (WHRadjBMI)19, blood triglycerides20 and risk of type 2 diabetes21, reached P=1 × 10−6 with BMI-unadjusted leptin and P=2 × 10−6 with BMI-adjusted leptin levels, with the leptin-increasing allele being associated with lower WHRadjBMI, triglycerides and risk of type 2 diabetes.
The estimated effects of five of the six loci (in/near LEP, SLC32A1, GCKR, CCNL1 or COBLL1) on leptin levels did not markedly differ in magnitude between the BMI-unadjusted and BMI-adjusted models, suggesting that these associations are not mediated by adiposity per se (Fig. 1). In contrast, the association between the FTO locus and leptin levels was completely abolished after adjusting for BMI, indicating that the association with leptin is entirely mediated by the well-established association between FTO and BMI22 (Fig. 1).
BMI is the most commonly used index of adiposity, but it is not a direct measure of adiposity and it does not distinguish between lean and fat body mass. To assess whether adjustment for a more direct measure of adiposity could enhance our ability to identify adiposity-independent loci, we performed secondary analyses in 13 studies that had data on both BMI and body fat percentage assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry or bioimpedance analysis (n=18,980 or 59% of stage 1 sample). The analysis showed no marked differences in the effect sizes between the BMI and body fat percentage-adjusted results for the leptin-associated LEP, SLC32A1, CCNL1, GCKR, COBLL1 and FTO loci (Supplementary Table 6), suggesting that adjustment for BMI as compared with a more direct measure of adiposity did not compromise our ability to identify adiposity-independent leptin-associated loci.
Effects on other traits and potential functional roles
We took forward the genome-wide significant leptin loci near LEP, near SLC32A1, in GCKR and near CCNL1, to examine their associations with obesity-related and metabolic traits and to more directly assess their putative roles in the control of circulating leptin. We also took forward the locus near COBLL1, given its robust association with WHRadjBMI19, even though it just missed the genome-wide significance threshold for association with BMI-adjusted and BMI-unadjusted leptin levels (Table 1). As the FTO-leptin association was completely accounted for by FTO’s association with BMI (Fig. 1), extensively described in the literature23, we did not include this locus in our follow-up analyses.
To examine the associations of the identified loci with obesity-related and metabolic traits, we performed look-ups in the data from relevant genetic consortia (Supplementary Table 7). To study the associations of the leptin-associated loci with the expression of nearby genes, we performed cis-expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) analyses in several human tissues, including the subcutaneous (n=776) and omental fat (n=742), liver (n=567), lymphocytes (n=778), brain (n=193) and skin (n=667) (Supplementary Table 8). We also examined the regulatory functions of these loci by studying their enrichment with functional genomic elements in data from the Roadmap Epigenomics Project24. Finally, to identify the causal genes in the leptin-associated loci, we performed ex vivo knockdown studies of adipocyte-expressed genes using small interfering RNA (siRNA) in explanted mouse adipose tissue.
Common variation near LEP regulates leptin levels
The rs10487505 variant (MAF 49%) is located 21 kb from LEP (Fig. 2a) and is in modest linkage disequilibrium (LD) (r2=0.4, D′=0.8) with the A19G (rs2167270, MAF 35%) variant that has been extensively studied in candidate gene studies but whose associations with increased levels of leptin and obesity have been inconclusive13,16. The leptin-increasing allele of the rs10487505 variant has been nominally associated with weight regain after bariatric surgery in a candidate gene-based analysis of 1,443 patients25. Look-ups in consortium data showed a nominally significant association for the leptin-decreasing allele of rs10487505 with higher BMI in the GIANT Consortium (P=0.03, N=221,677), as well as with increased risk of early-onset obesity (P=0.04, N=13,848) and higher birth weight (P=0.02, N=26,836) in the EGG Consortium (Supplementary Table 7). Although LEP is an obvious candidate gene to account for the association with circulating leptin levels, the rs10487505 variant was not associated with LEP messenger RNA expression in the omental or subcutaneous adipose tissue (SCAT), liver, lymphocytes, brain or skin (Supplementary Tables 8 and 9).
A variant in strong LD with rs10487505 (rs6979832, r2=0.98) overlapped with predicted enhancer elements in all three adipose cell lines of the Roadmap Epigenomics Project24. Further, a previous study identified a 465-bp adipocyte-specific enhancer region 4.5 kb upstream from the LEP transcription start site by using luciferase assays and chromatin state mapping26. This region harbours rs10249476 that is in modest LD with rs10487505 (r2=0.4, D′=0.8) and reached the second most significant association with BMI-adjusted leptin levels in stage 1 meta-analysis (P=3 × 10−10; n=30,810) (Fig. 2a).
Collectively, although the locus near LEP overlaps with predicted enhancer elements, the lack of association with LEP transcript expression in the fasting state suggests that other mechanisms may be involved in mediating the association of this locus with leptin levels, such as an effect on LEP expression in the fed state27 or an effect on leptin protein secretion.
To validate our knockdown strategy for subsequent analyses of candidate genes in loci other than the locus near LEP, we used siRNA against Lep in mouse adipose tissue explants. Electroporation of the perigonadal adipose tissue (PGAT) explants with siRNA against Lep resulted in a 92% decrease in Lep mRNA (P<1 × 10−4) and a 92% decrease in secreted leptin (P=4 × 10−4) (Fig. 4a,b, Supplementary Fig. 1C,D and Supplementary Table 10). In addition, to determine whether electroporation with siRNA altered other secretory function(s) of the perigonadal explants, we measured secretion of adiponectin and found no changes associated with Lep knockdown (Fig. 4d and Supplementary Fig. 1E).
ADIG may regulate leptin expression
The intergenic rs6071166 variant, ∼20 kb from the SLC32A1 gene (Fig. 2c), reached genome-wide significance for association with BMI-adjusted leptin levels and has not been previously identified for association with any other traits. In look-ups of genome-wide association study (GWAS) consortium data, we did not find significant association with other obesity-related or metabolic traits (Supplementary Table 7). The rs6071166 variant was not associated with the mRNA expression of nearby genes in the adipose tissue, liver, lymphocytes, brain or skin (Supplementary Tables 8 and 9).
To identify the potential causal gene in this locus using the mouse PGAT explant model described above, we first measured the expression levels of murine homologues of genes surrounding the lead variant associated with circulating leptin levels. We tested PGAT and SCAT of 4-month-old C57BL/6J mice fed chow or high-fat diet (Fig. 3c,d). In addition, we analysed candidate gene expression in other tissues (liver and hypothalamus) that we predicted could play a role in circulating leptin levels via effects on leptin clearance or response (Supplementary Fig. 7). Genes were considered strong candidates if they were highly expressed in adipose tissue and/or if they were regulated by high-fat diet feeding in a manner similar to Lep. This analysis identified adipogenin (Adig) as a candidate gene in the SLC32A1 locus; Adig is highly expressed in the adipose tissue, in contrast to other nearby genes. To test whether Adig affected Lep expression, we performed ex vivo knockdown studies using siRNA against Adig in mouse PGAT explants. We found that knockdown of Adig decreased Lep expression by 26% (P=4 × 10−4) and leptin secretion by 23% (P=0.003), consistent with a causal role for ADIG in control of circulating leptin levels (Fig. 4a,b and Supplementary Fig. 2C,D).
ADIG is located ∼116 kb from the rs6071166 variant and encodes a cytoplasmic adipocyte protein adipogenin, that is, similar to leptin, highly and specifically expressed in the adipose tissue28,29,30 and upregulated by treatment with insulin and glucose30. Adig expression is also strongly upregulated in murine 3T3-L1 preadipocytes during in vitro differentiation into adipocytes28,29. Two studies have investigated the effect of Adig knockdown on the differentiation of 3T3-L1 cells and expression of Pparγ2, a master regulator of adipocyte differentiation, but with conflicting results; whereas the first study found Adig knockdown to block adipocyte differentiation and decrease Pparγ2 expression28, a later study found no similar changes30. When we measured Pparγ2 expression following Adig knockdown in PGAT explants containing mature adipocytes, we did not see a change as compared with controls (Supplementary Fig. 2F).
Common variation in GCKR regulates leptin levels
Variants (r2≥0.9 with our lead SNP rs780093) of the leptin-associated locus in GCKR have previously shown genome-wide significant associations with more than 25 metabolic traits; the leptin-increasing allele has been associated with increased fasting glucose and fasting insulin but decreased 2-h glucose and higher high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and lower total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, C-reactive protein and circulating uric acid levels, among others (Supplementary Table 11). The GCKR gene encodes a regulatory protein in the liver that inhibits the activity of glucokinase, the enzyme responsible for regulating the uptake, metabolism and storage of circulating glucose31. A putative causal variant in this gene is the common nonsynonymous Pro446Leu variant (rs1260326), for which rs780093 acts as a good proxy (r2=0.9). Carriers of the glucose-lowering Leu allele have a reduced ability to sequester and inhibit glucokinase and a blunted response to fructose 6-phosphate, both of which favour the generation of free and active cytoplasmic glucokinase32.
The mechanisms that might link changes in GCKR function to leptin levels are not known. As insulin increases leptin secretion from adipocytes33 and the GCKR locus is strongly associated with circulating levels of insulin34, the association of the GCKR locus with leptin levels could be the consequence of the GCKR locus’ effect on insulin levels. The leptin-increasing allele of the rs780093 variant was significantly associated with higher levels of fasting insulin in studies included in our stage 2 meta-analyses (P=2 × 10−5, N=8,953). To test whether insulin mediated the association of rs780093 with circulating leptin levels, we analysed the association of rs780093 with leptin, while adjusting for fasting insulin levels. Although the effect size was somewhat attenuated, the association of rs780093 with BMI-adjusted leptin levels remained significant after adjustment for fasting insulin (β=0.047, P=2 × 10−4 versus β=0.034, P=0.004 before and after the adjustment, respectively), suggesting that the association of the GCKR locus with leptin is at least in part independent of effects on insulin levels.
Although GCKR’s function renders it a potential candidate among the genes in this region, cis-eQTL analyses showed association of the leptin-increasing allele of rs780093 with increased expression of the nearby IFT172 in the liver (P=7 × 10−30), omental fat (P=6 × 10−64) and subcutaneous fat (P=3 × 10−52) (Supplementary Table 9). The rs780093 variant is, however, only in moderate LD (r2=0.4) with the peak SNP influencing IFT172 expression in the region and the peak SNP remained significantly associated with IFT172 expression after adjustment for rs780093, whereas the association of rs780093 was abolished after adjustment for the peak SNP (Supplementary Table 9).
Because of the observations in human tissues, we examined Ift172 in the mouse explant model. Ift172 was not highly expressed in mouse PGAT or SCAT and levels were not upregulated by high-fat diet (Fig. 3e,f). Ift172 was, however, upregulated in the liver under high-fat diet feeding (Supplementary Fig. 7E). Knockdown of Ift172 in PGAT explants decreased Lep mRNA expression by 22% (P=0.02), but did not decrease leptin protein secretion (P=0.6) (Fig. 4a,b and Supplementary Fig. 3C,D). IFT172 is known to play a major role in assembly and maintenance of primary cilia that act as critical signalling hubs for cellular pathways during development35. Knockout of Ift genes in central neurons causes obesity in mice36 and obesity is a clinical feature in two human ciliopathic syndromes, the Alström and Bardet–Biedl syndromes37,38. In the hypothalamus, alterations in the function of the primary cilium lead to impaired leptin signalling39. Therefore, we cannot exclude a role for IFT172 in the regulation of circulating leptin levels.
Another nearby gene, MpV17 mitochondrial inner membrane protein, is a potential candidate in the region based on its expression in mice fed chow or high-fat diet; Mpv17 expression was increased by high-fat diet, in a manner similar to Lep (Fig. 3c,d). However, knockdown of Mpv17 did not change Lep mRNA expression (P=0.2) or leptin secretion (P=0.2) by PGAT explants (Fig. 4a,b and Supplementary Fig. 4C,D), suggesting that the involvement of MPV17 in leptin regulation is unlikely.
Locus near CCNL1 regulates leptin levels and birth weight
The leptin-decreasing allele of rs900400, located 67 kb upstream from CCNL1 (Fig. 2d), was previously reported for its association with lower birth weight40. This cross-phenotype association could indicate a mechanism that is shared between birth weight and leptin levels in adulthood. Fetal adipose tissue is capable of producing leptin41 and fetal leptin levels are correlated with fetal fat mass42,43. Placenta provides an additional source of leptin for the fetus, however, and it has been suggested that leptin could mediate fetal growth44,45. Assuming that leptin levels track from birth through adulthood, increased leptin levels could drive the association of the CCNL1 locus with birth weight. Other studies suggest that leptin production is decreased in cultured adipocytes from men born with a low birth weight46. Therefore, the association of the CCNL1 locus with leptin levels in adulthood could be mediated by its association with birth weight.
Although CCNL1 is the nearest gene to rs900400, our cis-eQTL analyses identified rs900400 as the variant most significantly associated with the expression of another nearby gene, TIPARP (Supplementary Table 9). The TIPARP gene encodes a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase involved in DNA repair. The leptin-increasing allele of rs900400 was associated with lower TIPARP expression in omental fat (3 × 10−30) and subcutaneous fat (P=7 × 10−58) (Supplementary Table 9). Tiparp was also implicated as a causal gene by our expression analysis of mouse adipose tissue and its expression was increased in SCAT and liver in mice fed with high-fat diet (Fig. 3h and Supplementary Fig. 7G). Knockdown of Tiparp in mouse PGAT explants did not, however, significantly alter the expression of Lep mRNA (P=0.7) or leptin secretion (P=0.8) (Fig. 4a,b and Supplementary Fig. 5D,E). Although we attempted to use SCAT for explant knockdown studies, high intra-depot variability compromised this approach. Interestingly, stimulation of the explants with insulin and dexamethasone increased explant expression of Tiparp by 50% (P=0.003) over incubation in basal media alone, in a manner similar to Lep expression (Fig. 4c and Supplementary Fig. 5A). Collectively, although TIPARP remains a putative causal gene within the locus near CCNL1, further evidence is required to confirm its role in the regulation of circulating leptin levels.
COBLL1 or GRB14 may regulate leptin levels
The intronic rs6738627 variant in COBLL1 (Fig. 2e) did not reach genome-wide significance for the association with leptin levels (Fig. 1 and Table 1). However, as previous GWAS have shown robust associations of the leptin-increasing allele with a lower WHRadjBMI19, we chose to take it forward for follow-up analyses, to examine the role of leptin levels in the previous associations.
Look-ups in data from genetic consortia showed a strong association of the leptin-increasing allele of rs6738627 with higher body fat percentage (P=2 × 10−8, n=76,338; Supplementary Table 7). As reported previously, the rs6738627 variant was also strongly associated with decreased WHRadjBMI (P=2 × 10−8, n=174,672; Supplementary Table 7), suggestive of a preferential gluteal rather than abdominal fat storage, which may contribute to the association of rs6738627 with increased leptin levels47.
In PGAT and SCAT expression analyses in mice, we found an upregulation of Cobll1 in high-fat diet-fed mice in both depots (Fig. 3i,j). Although knockdown of Cobll1 in the perigonadal explants did not influence Lep mRNA expression (P=0.2), it did decrease leptin protein secretion by 16% (P=3 × 10−4, Fig. 4a,b), suggesting a potential causal role for Cobll1. In addition, stimulation of explants with insulin and dexamethasone increased explant expression of Cobll1 by 78% (P=0.004) over incubation in basal media alone (Fig. 4c and Supplementary Fig. 6A). COBLL1 is known to be involved in neural tube formation48, but its possible functions in adipose tissue are unknown.
In human eQTL analyses, the leptin-increasing allele of the COBLL1 locus showed an association with lower expression of GRB14 in omental fat (P=5 × 10−12) and subcutaneous fat (P=3 × 10−5) (Supplementary Table 9). We did not, however, find high expression of Grb14 in PGAT or SCAT explants from mice and the levels were not regulated by high-fat diet feeding (Fig. 3i,j). The protein product of GRB14 is the growth factor receptor-bound protein 14 that binds directly to the insulin receptor and inhibits insulin signalling49. The adipose tissue expression of GRB14 may play a role in regulating insulin sensitivity50. Grb14-deficient mice exhibit improved glucose tolerance, lower circulating insulin levels and increased incorporation of glucose into glycogen in the liver and skeletal muscle51. Both COBLL1 and GRB14 are thus possible candidates to account for the association of the COBLL1 locus with leptin levels.
Enrichment with pathways and regulatory elements
We used the Data-driven Expression Prioritized Integration for Complex Traits (DEPICT) software52 to identify enrichment of gene sets and pathways across loci reaching P<1 × 10−5 for association with leptin levels. However, none of our findings reached the false discovery rate threshold of 5% (Supplementary Tables 12–17). Next, we used the Gene Relationships Across Implicated traits (GRAIL) tool53 to identify genes near the leptin-associated loci having similarities in the text describing them within published article abstracts. However, no statistically significant results were found in these analyses either (Supplementary Tables 18 and 19). Finally, we used the Uncovering Enrichment Through Simulation method54 to test for the overall enrichment of leptin-associated loci reaching P<10−5 with ChromHMM annotations for adipose and brain tissues available from the Roadmap Epigenomics Project24. However, we did not find significant enrichment of our leptin-associated loci in any chromatin states once corrected for multiple testing (Supplementary Table 20). The lack of significant findings may be due to the small number of loci identified and the limited knowledge available on leptin-regulating pathways in adipose tissue.
Established adiposity loci and leptin
Circulating leptin levels correlate closely with BMI and other measures of adiposity3. The most recent GWAS meta-analysis for BMI, including nearly 340,000 individuals, identified 97 loci that reached genome-wide significance22. Of the 97 BMI-increasing loci, 89 showed a directionally concordant association with increased BMI-unadjusted leptin levels (Pbinomal=2 × 10−18), of which 25 reached nominal significance (Supplementary Table 21). Previous GWAS of extreme and early-onset obesity have identified 12 genome-wide significant loci55,56,57,58. Of these, ten showed a directionally consistent association with increased BMI-unadjusted leptin levels (Pbinomal=0.04), of which five reached nominal significance (Supplementary Table 21).
We also examined leptin associations for 49 loci identified in GWAS for WHRadjBMI, a measure of body fat distribution independent of overall adiposity19. Of the 49 WHRadjBMI-increasing loci, only 24 showed a directionally concordant association with increased BMI-adjusted leptin levels (Supplementary Table 22). As the distribution of body fat differs between men and women, we also examined the leptin associations for the 49 WHRadjBMI loci in men and women separately. There was no enrichment of leptin associations in either of the sexes, with 27 loci showing a directionally concordant association with increased leptin levels in men and 20 loci in women (Supplementary Table 22).
In a meta-analysis of genetic association data in up to 52,126 individuals, we identified 5 common loci associated with circulating leptin levels. In addition, a locus near COBLL1, previously identified for association with a lower WHRadjBMI19, reached P=1 × 10−6 for association with increased leptin levels. Even though leptin correlates strongly with adiposity, we did not identify loci previously associated with BMI, other than FTO, despite having a sample size similar to early GWAS meta-analyses of BMI that identified multiple loci59. On the contrary, five of the six loci we identified were associated with leptin independently of BMI or body fat percentage. Our findings indicate that genetic mechanisms not influencing adiposity may have an important role in the regulation of circulating leptin levels.
Our strongest adiposity-independent leptin signal was near LEP, but we also identified leptin-associated variants in four other genomic loci, providing evidence that mechanisms other than those that involve LEP per se may regulate leptin production and release from adipose tissue. In one of these loci, near SLC32A1, our knockdown studies indicated a role for adipogenin, a gene involved in the regulation of adipocyte differentiation28,29. Although adipogenin was identified as a potent regulator of adipogenesis a decade ago28,29, our results provide the first evidence linking this function to leptin regulation. We anticipate that our findings will motivate and inform eventual testing of Adig by transgenic manipulation in mice.
No clear effect on leptin production was seen following knockdown of candidate genes in the GCKR and CCNL1 loci, which may indicate that the gene implicated by position plays no role in the phenotype, or that the effect was undetectable in our experimental conditions. Alternatively, the association with leptin levels may be explained by effects of non-coding elements on other genes outside the implicated genetic interval, or by inter-species differences. Furthermore, although adipose tissue is the most direct contributor to circulating leptin levels, the effect of the causal gene may be conveyed by another tissue; leptin production and secretion are influenced by insulin, catecholamines and other hormones, as well as paracrine effects of local inflammatory cells on adipocytes60.
Although the locus near SLC32A1 had not been identified previously for association with other traits, the leptin-associated loci in/near GCKR, CCNL1 and COBLL1 have been associated with multiple obesity-related and metabolic traits19,20,34,40,61. These cross-phenotype associations may either reflect pleiotropy, where a gene product influences multiple traits, and/or mediation effects, where one phenotype is causally related to a second phenotype. For example, the association of the pleiotropic GCKR locus with leptin levels may be partly mediated through GCKR’s role in the regulation of glucose homeostasis and insulin levels34,61, which may influence leptin production and secretion in adipose tissue33. The COBLL1 locus is strongly associated with decreased WHRadjBMI, indicative of a preferential accumulation of gluteal subcutaneous fat, which may contribute to the observed association with circulating leptin levels47. The identification of the birth weight locus, CCNL1, as a leptin-regulating locus may provide an intriguing link between leptin regulation and fetal growth, albeit such a link remains to be more firmly established45.
Unravelling the polygenic basis of leptin production could provide opportunities for targeted leptin supplementation in obese individuals. Although leptin therapy is an efficient weight-loss treatment for obese individuals with congenital leptin deficiency, the beneficial effects of leptin supplementation do not translate to all obese patients62. Sensitivity to changes in circulating concentration of leptin may be enhanced at very low values11 where a relatively small increase in leptin production may be sensed by the homeostatic feedback system that controls energy balance. As a substantial minority of individuals with common forms of obesity, not associated with leptin mutations, have relatively low levels of circulating leptin63, augmenting leptin levels in this subgroup could be therapeutically worthwhile. Identification of leptin-regulating loci may provide new tools for identifying obese individuals with susceptibility to low leptin levels and who may benefit of leptin treatment.
In 2010, Sun et al.64 identified two common non-synonymous SNPs in the leptin receptor (LEPR) gene associated with leptin receptor levels. Leptin receptor plays an essential role in mediating the physiological effects of leptin. Although some studies have described abnormally high circulating leptin levels in carriers of rare LEPR mutations65, others have not66. We did not find association between LEPR variants and circulating leptin levels, suggesting that common variants in LEPR are not important regulators of circulating leptin levels.
Our meta-analyses were limited by the number of available studies with leptin data, imputation by HapMap reference panel for autosomal chromosomes and the fact that we examined additive effects only. In addition, we corrected for adiposity by adjusting for BMI, which is a heterogeneous measure of adiposity as it does not account for individual differences in body fat and lean mass. Future discovery efforts in extended sample sizes based on genome-wide imputation of 1000 Genomes reference panels, which include X and Y chromosomes and which also test for recessive and dominant inheritance, will allow for the discovery of more and lower-frequency variants, and for refining association signatures of already established leptin-associated loci.
In summary, we identified six genetic loci associated with circulating leptin levels, of which five showed associations independently of adiposity. Our findings represent a step forward in the understanding of biological mechanisms regulating leptin production in adipose tissue and open new avenues for examining the influence of variation in leptin levels on adiposity and metabolic health.
Study design. We conducted a two-stage meta-analysis to identify leptin-associated loci in adults of European ancestry. In stage 1, we performed a meta-analysis of 23 GWAS (n=32,161) (Supplementary Table 1) for BMI-unadjusted and BMI-adjusted circulating levels of leptin. Stage 2 included 13 additional studies (n=19,979), which provided either de novo or in silico data for the lead SNPs of the independent loci reaching P<1 × 10−6 in Stage 1 (Supplementary Table 5). Secondary meta-analyses were conducted in men (n=13,363) and women (n=18,698) separately, and with adjustment for body fat percentage (assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry or bioimpedance analysis) instead of BMI (n=18,980). The study-specific descriptive statistics are presented in Supplementary Table 23.
Stage 1 genome-wide association analyses. Following study-specific quality control measures, the genotype data were imputed using the HapMap Phase II CEU reference panel (Supplementary Table 24). Directly genotyped and imputed variants were then tested for association with logarithmically transformed leptin (ng ml−1), adjusting for age, age2 and any necessary study-specific covariates (for example, genotype-derived principal components) in a linear regression model. The analyses were performed with and without additional adjustment for BMI. In studies that had assessed body fat percentage with bioimpedance analysis or dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, additional analyses were performed with adjustment for body fat percentage. The analyses were performed in men and women separately. In studies that included closely related individuals, regression coefficients were also estimated in the context of a variance component model that modelled relatedness in men and women combined, with sex as a covariate.
Before performing meta-analyses on the data from individual studies, SNPs with poor imputation quality scores (r2-hat <0.3 in MACH, proper-info <0.4 in IMPUTE, INFO <0.8 in PLINK) or with a minor allele count <6 were excluded for each study (Supplementary Table 24). The genotype data for the leptin-associated lead SNPs was of high quality with a median imputation score of ≥0.94 (Supplementary Table 26). The fifth percentile for all SNPs was ≥0.80, except for the previously established rs900400 SNP near CCNL1.
All individual GWAS were genomic control corrected before meta-analyses. Individual study-specific genomic control values ranged from 0.977 to 1.051. Fixed effects meta-analyses were then conducted using the inverse variance-weighted method implemented in METAL. The genomic control values for the meta-analysed results were 1.050, 1.026 and 1.022 in the BMI-unadjusted meta-analyses of all individuals, men and women, and 1.046, 1.022 and 1.015 in the BMI-adjusted meta-analyses, respectively. Using the LD score regression method67 in the Stage 1 meta-analyses suggests that the observed inflation is not due to population substructure. The regression intercept, which estimates inflation after removing polygenic signals, was 0.994 for BMI-unadjusted and 1.004 for BMI-adjusted meta-analyses of men and women combined.
Selection of SNPs for follow-up. We used a pairwise distance criterion of ±500 kb and r2<0.1 between SNPs that reached P<10−6 in the meta-analysis of BMI-adjusted or -unadjusted meta-analysis of leptin levels in Stage 1 in men and women combined or separately, to select loci forward for follow-up in Stage 2. We tested the association of the lead SNPs in up to 19,929 adults of white European ancestry in Stage 2.
Stage 2 follow-up of the loci reaching P<10−6 in Stage 1. Association results were obtained from 13 studies that had not been included in the Stage 1 meta-analyses (Supplementary Table 5). Samples and SNPs that did not meet the quality control criteria defined by each individual study were excluded. Minimum genotyping quality control criteria were defined as Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium P>10−7, call rate >90% and concordance >99% in duplicate samples in each of the follow-up studies.
We tested the association between the SNPs and leptin in each Stage 2 study using approaches similar to those described for the Stage 1 studies. We subsequently performed a meta-analysis of β-coefficients and s.e. from Stage 2 using the inverse variance fixed effects method. The final meta-analysis combined GWAS results from Stage 1 with the Stage 2 results. The conventional P-value threshold of <5 × 10−8 in the combined Stage 1 and Stage 2 meta-analysis was used to determine genome-wide significance.
Identifying genes and biological pathways at associated loci
Cross-trait look-ups. To further examine the relationship between the leptin-associated loci and anthropometric and metabolic parameters, we acquired association results for the loci in or near LEP, SLC32A1, GCKR, CCNL1 and COBLL1 from nine GWAS meta-analysis consortia: ADIPOGen (BMI-adjusted adiponectin), BCGC (body fat percentage), DIAGRAM (type 2 diabetes), Early growth genetics (birth weight, early-onset obesity), ICBP (systolic and diastolic blood pressure), GIANT (height, BMI, waist–hip ratio adjusted for BMI), GLGC (circulating levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides and total cholesterol), MAGIC (fasting glucose, fasting insulin) and ReproGen (age at menarche) (Supplementary Table 7).
National Human Genome Research Institute GWAS Catalog look-ups. To identify the associations of the leptin-associated loci in published GWAS, we extracted previously reported GWAS associations within 500 kb and r2>0.7 with any of the lead leptin-associated SNPs, from the GWAS Catalog of the National Human Genome Research Institute ( www.genome.gov/gwastudies) (Supplementary Table 11).
Overlap with functional regulatory elements. We used the Uncovering Enrichment Through Simulation method to combine the leptin association data with the Roadmap Epigenomics Project segmentation data54. The pipeline chose 10,000 sets of random SNPs among HapMap2 SNPs with a MAF>0.05 and that matched the original input SNPs based on proximity to a transcription start site and the number of LD partners (r2>0.8 in individuals of European ancestry in the 1000 Genomes Project). The LD partners were combined with their original lead SNP to create 10,000 sets of matched random SNPs and their respective LD partners. These sets were intersected with the 15-state ChromHMM data from the Roadmap Epigenomics Project and resultant co-localizations were collapsed from total SNPs down to loci, which were then used to calculate an empirical P-value when comparing the original SNPs with the random sets. In addition to examining overall enrichment for all leptin-associated loci combined, we examined the variant-specific overlap with regulatory elements for each of the leptin-associated index SNPs and variants in strong LD (r2>0.8).
Expression quantitative trait loci. We examined the cis-associations of the leptin-associated loci with the expression of nearby genes in the lymphocytes, skin, liver, omental fat, subcutaneous fat and brain tissue (Supplementary Table 8). Conditional analyses were performed by including both the leptin-associated SNP and the most significant cis-associated SNP in the association model for a given transcript. To minimize the potential for false positives, we only considered associations that reached study-specific Bonferroni-corrected significance threshold (P<0.05/(total number of transcripts tested)).
GRAIL analyses: We used GRAIL to identify genes near the leptin-associated loci having similarities in the published scientific text using PubMed abstracts as of December 2006 (ref. 53). The leptin loci were queried against HapMap release 22 for the European panel and we controlled for gene size.
DEPICT analyses: We used DEPICT to identify the most probable causal gene at a given associated locus, reconstituted gene sets enriched for BMI associations, and tissues and cell types in which genes from associated loci are highly expressed52. We clumped GWAS-based meta-analysis summary statistics using 500 kb flanking regions, LD r2>0.1 and excluded SNPs with P≥1 × 10−5. HapMap Project Phase II CEU genotype data were used to compute LD and genomic coordinates were defined by genome build GRCh37.
Knockdown of genes in mouse adipose tissue explants
Materials. Expression analyses were performed on PGAT and SCAT from 4-month-old C57BL/6J mice (derived from Jackson, Stock number 000664) fed chow (Purina PicoLab 5058) or high-fat diet (Research Diets, Inc., D12492i, 60% kcal from fat), to increase adiposity and circulating leptin levels. We measured expression of genes located ±100 kb of each lead variant or genes including SNPs with r2>0.4 with the lead variant. Tiparp was included after its identification by eQTL analysis, and Ucn and Mpv17 were included based on their proximity to variants with r2>0.4 with the lead variant.
For knockdown experiments, 15-week-old male C57BL/6J mice fed high-fat diet ad libitum starting at 6 weeks of age were purchased from Jackson Laboratory (Stock Number 380050, Bar Harbor, ME). Animals were maintained at Columbia University animal facility for up to an additional 5 weeks until they reached ∼30% fat mass as determined by time-domain NMR (Minispec Analyst AD; Bruker Optics, Silberstreifen, Germany).
Mice were maintained at an ambient temperature of 22 °C–24 °C with a 12-h dark–light cycle (lights on at 0700, h) in a pathogen-free barrier facility. The protocol was approved by the Columbia University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
Electroporation and culture of adipose tissue explants. Non-fasted mice were killed at around 20 weeks of age at ∼1000, h. PGAT was dissected and minced into 1- to 2-mm fragments. These fragments were evenly distributed into three replicates per control or knockdown condition. Approximately 7–11 fragments were added per well (for a total amount of ∼80 mg tissue) in 12-well culture dishes containing 1 ml M199 with Antibiotic-Antimycotic (Anti-Anti, 5 × ; Invitrogen). Following a 20-min incubation in 5 × Anti-Anti media, tissue fragments were washed twice with 1 ml PBS and then transferred to 4 mm Gene Pulser cuvettes (Bio-Rad) and electroporated in 400 μl PBS with 1 nmol siRNA against Lep, Adig, Ift172, Mpv17, Tiparp or Cobll1 (Stealth siRNA, Invitrogen). Non-targeting sequences were used as negative controls (Invitrogen). Electroporation was performed with a Gene Pulser XceII (Bio-Rad) using 50 V, 102 wave pulses, with a pulse length of 30 ms and 0.1 ms between pulses68. The tissue fragments were subsequently cultured at 37 °C in 5% CO2 in 12-well plates for 20 h in basal media consisting of M199 media with 10% fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen) plus 1 × Anti-Anti before stimulation for 12 h with basal media plus 7 nM insulin and 25 nM dexamethasone (both from Sigma), to maintain leptin expression in the explants at levels comparable to those of in vivo tissues69. Knockdown was considered successful if candidate expression was decreased by ≥30%. The effect of insulin and dexamethasone on expression of candidate genes was determined using the same mincing and culturing strategy without electroporation.
Measuring mRNA levels and leptin and adiponectin secretion. Total RNA was isolated using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) and reverse transcribed using Transcriptor First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Roche) using both OligoDT and random hexamer primers. Lightcycler 480 SYBR Green I Master was used for quantitative PCR assays (Roche). Expression of murine homologues of candidate genes in PGAT and SCAT was determined using the 2(−ΔΔC(T)) method70. Gene expression in the knockdown experiments was calculated by Lightcycler 480 software (Roche) based on a standard curve. Primers used are listed in Supplementary Table 25. Culture media was collected from the same samples used for RNA analyses. Following the 12 h insulin/dexamethasone stimulation, secreted leptin and adiponectin were measured using the Perkin-Elmer AlphaLISA kits for mouse leptin and adiponectin (according to the manufacturer’s protocol). Not all samples were included for adiponectin measurement due to the discontinuation of the AlphaLISA kit by Perkin-Elmer.
Statistics. Each gene knockdown was tested on tissue from 5 to 13 different mice, as indicated. Control and knockdown samples from each mouse were treated as matched pairs. Each data point represents the mean of three replicates from a single mouse. Differences between control and knockdown conditions were calculated by two-way repeated measures analysis of variance using GraphPad Prism 6. P-values <0.05 were considered significant.
How to cite this article: Kilpeläinen, T. O. et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis uncovers novel loci influencing circulating leptin levels. Nat. Commun. 7:10494 doi: 10.1038/ncomms10494 (2016).
The full list of acknowledgements appears in the Supplementary Information. Funding for this study was provided by the Academy of Finland (41071, 117787, 118065, 121584, 124282, 126925, 129494, 129322, 129378, 130326, 134309, 134791, 136895, 139635, 250207, 263836, 286284 and 263924); Ahokas Foundation; ALF/LUA research grant in Gothenburg; Amgen; Augustinus Foundation; Becket Foundation; Bristol-Myers Squibb; British Heart Foundation programme (PG/13/66/30442 and PG/07/131/24254); Canadian Institutes of Health Research (FRCN-CCT-83028); Centre for Medical Systems Biology; Danish Centre for Health Technology Assessment; Danish Council for Independent Research (DFF-1333-00124 and DFF-1331-00730B); Danish Diabetes Association; Danish Heart Foundation; Danish Pharmaceutical Association; Danish Research Council; Department of Health Policy Research Programme (0090049); Diabetes UK; Donald W. Reynolds Foundation; Dutch Arthritis Association (DAA 2010_017); Dutch government (NWO 184.021.007); Emil Aaltonen Foundation; Erasmus MC; Erasmus University; European Commission (FP6-LSHG-CT-2006-018947, FP6-LSHG-CT-2006-01947, HEALTH-F2-2008-201865-GEFOS, FP7-201668, FP7-223004, FP7-259679, FP7-305739 and FP7-IDEAS-ERC-323195); European Regional Development Fund; EUROSPAN; Faculty of Biology and Medicine of Lausanne; Finnish Centre for Pensions; Finnish Cultural Foundation; Finnish Diabetes Research Society; Finnish Foundation of Cardiovascular Research; Finnish Foundation for Pediatric Research; Finnish National Institute for Health and Welfare; Finnish Special Governmental Subsidy for Health Sciences; Finska Läkaresällskapet; Folkhälsan Research Foundation; Genetic Laboratory of the Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC; German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD); German Federal Ministry of Education and Research; GlaxoSmithKline; Göran Gustafsson Foundation; Heart Foundation of Northern Sweden; Helmholtz Zentrum München; Ib Henriksen Foundation; Innovation-Oriented Research Program on Genomics (SenterNovem IGE05007); Italian Ministry of Health (ICS110.1/RF97.71); John W. Barton Sr. Chair in Genetics and Nutrition; Juho Vainio Foundation; King’s College London; Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation; Kuopio, Tampere and Turku University Hospital Medical Funds (X51001, 9M048, 9N035); Leiden University Medical Centre; Li Ka Shing Foundation; Liv och Hälsa; Local Government Pensions Institution; Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität; Lundbeck Foundation; Lundberg Foundation; Medical Research Council (MC_U106179471, MC_UU_12013/3, and MC_UU_12013/8); Medical Research Council-GlaxoSmithKline pilot programme grant (G0701863); Ministry of Education, Culture and Science of the Netherlands; Ministry of health, Welfare and Sports of the Netherlands; Ministry of Health and Department of Educational Assistance, University and Research of the Autonomous Province of Bolzano; Danish Ministry of Internal Affairs and Health; Munich Center of Health Sciences; Municipality of Rotterdam; National Cancer Institute (CA047988); National Eye Institute; National Institute on Aging (Intramural research programme, N01AG62101, N01AG62103, N01AG62106, 1R01AG032098-01A1, 263MD9164 and 263 MD 821336); National Institute for Health Research; National Institutes of Health (DK52431, HG004399, HG004446, CA087969, CA055075, DK058845, CA65725, CA49449, CA67262, CA50385 and UO1CA098233); Netherlands Brain Foundation (HersenStichting Nederland); Netherlands Consortium for Healthy Aging (050-060-810); Netherlands Genomics Initiative; Netherlands Heart Foundation (2001 D 032); Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (175-010-2005-011, 904-61-095, 911-03-012, 911-03-016, 917-66-344 and 911-03-012); Netherlands Organization for the Health Research and Development; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (5R01HL068891, 5R01HL087700, R01HL117078, HHSN26800625226C, HHSN268200782096C, HL-043851, HL-045670, HL080467, N01-HC95159, N01-HC-95160, N01-HC-95161, N01-HC-95162, N01-HC-95163, N01-HC-95164, N01-HC-95165, N01-HC-95166, N01-HC-95167, N01-HC-95168, N01-HC-95169, N02-HL-64278, N01-HC-65226, R01-HL-071051, R01-HL-071205, R01-HL-071250, R01-HL-071251, R01-HL-071252, R01-HL-071258, R01-HL-071259, R01-HL-088451, R00-HL-098459, U01-HG007033, UL1-RR-24156, UL1-RR-25005, UL1-TR-000040 and UL1-TR-001079); National Health Service Foundation Trust; National Institutes of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (1R01DK080015, R01DK089256, 5R01DK068336, 5R01DK075681 and 5R01DK07568102); Novo Nordisk; Novo Nordisk Foundation; New York Obesity Nutrition Research Center Pilot and Feasilibity Grant (DK-26687); Orion-Farmos Research Foundation; Pfizer Inc.; Paavo Nurmi Foundation; Påhlssons Foundation; Research Foundation of Copenhagen County; Roche Pharmaceuticals; Research Institute for Diseases in the Elderly (014-93-015; RIDE2); Samfundet Folkhälsan; Signe and Ane Gyllenberg Foundation; Sigrid Jusélius Foundation; Social Insurance Institution of Finland; South Tyrolean Sparkasse Foundation; Swedish Diabetes Association; Swedish Diabetes Foundation; Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research; Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation (20140422); Swedish Research Council (2012-1397); Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics; Swiss National Science Foundation (3100AO-116323/1, 33CSCO-122661, 33CS30-139468 and 33CS30-148401); Tampere Tuberculosis Foundation; Torsten and Ragnar Söderberg’s Foundation; Umeå University Career Development Award; Unilever Colworth; Wellcome Trust (WT064890, WT089062, WT090532, WT098017, WT098051, WT091551, 081917/Z/07/Z and 086596/Z/08/Z); Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics core funding (090532); Wissenschaftsoffensive TMO; Yrjö Jahnsson Foundation.
Supplementary Figures 1-7, Supplementary Tables 1-26, Supplementary Note 1 and Supplementary References
About this article
World Journal of Pediatrics (2018)