Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Ocean carbon uptake and storage influenced by wind bias in global climate models

Abstract

In global climate model pre-industrial control simulations the Southern Hemisphere westerly winds show a systematic bias in position and strength relative to estimates of their actual position and strength. These wind-stress biases impact the simulated transport of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current1 and the nature of Southern Ocean water-mass formation1 and may affect the rate of meridional overturning of the global ocean2. The effect they have on oceanic carbon uptake and storage is unknown, however. Here we demonstrate, using a coupled carbon–climate model3, that the wind-stress biases reduce equilibrium ocean carbon storage, redistribute carbon within the ocean and increase oceanic carbon uptake in climate change simulations. The wind-stress biases act directly by influencing Ekman pumping dynamics in the Southern Ocean and also seem to have an indirect effect on the overturning circulation and carbon distribution through the Agulhas leakage and Indo–Atlantic salt flux. Our results indicate that carbon–climate model simulations with the typical pre-industrial wind-stress bias will over-estimate ocean carbon sequestration, and thereby under-estimate atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations in the twenty-first century, relative to unbiased simulations. The new generation of coupled carbon–climate models may be subject to these wind biases, which could alter their carbon–climate response, although it is worth noting that the uncertainty arising from wind biases that we demonstrate here is one of several uncertainties that affect modelled ocean carbon uptake4.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Evolution of ocean carbon to equilibrium.
Figure 2: Equilibrium ocean carbon storage.
Figure 3: Equilibrium carbon–circulation relations.
Figure 4: Transient ocean carbon uptake.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Russell, J., Stouffer, R. J. & Dixon, K. Intercomparison of the Southern Ocean circulations in IPCC coupled model control simulations. J. Clim. 19, 4560–4575 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sijp, W. & England, M. The effect of a northward shift in the Southern Hemisphere westerlies on the global ocean. Prog. Oceanogr. 79, 1–19 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Weaver, A. et al. The UVic Earth System Climate Model: Model description, climatology, and applications to past, present and future climates. Atmos. Ocean 39, 1–68 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Friedlingstein, P. et al. Climate–carbon cycle feedback analysis: Results from the C4MIP model intercomparison. J. Clim. 19, 3337–3353 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Meredith, M., Naveira Garabato, A., Hogg, A. M. & Farneti, R. Sensitivity of the overturning circulation in the Southern Ocean to decadal changes in wind forcing. J. Clim. (in the press).

  6. Fyfe, J. & Saenko, O. Simulated changes in the extratropical Southern Hemisphere winds and currents. Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L06701 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Russell, J., Dixon, K., Gnanadesikan, A., Stouffer, R. & Toggweiler, J. The Southern Hemisphere Westerlies in a warming world: Propping open the door to the deep ocean. J. Clim. 19, 6382–6390 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Eby, M. et al. Lifetime of anthropogenic climate change: Millennial time scales of potential CO2 and surface temperature perturbations. J. Clim. 22, 2501–2511 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Meehl, G. A. et al. The WCRP CMIP3 multi-model dataset: A new era in climate change research. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 88, 1383–1394 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hibbard, K., Meehl, G. A., Cox, P. M. & Friedlingstein, P. A strategy for climate change stabilization experiments. Eos 88, 217–221 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Beal, L. et al. On the role of the Agulhas system in ocean circulation and climate. Nature 472, 429–436 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Peeters, F. et al. Vigorous exchange between the Indian and Atlantic oceans at the end of the past five glacial periods. Nature 430, 661–665 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Biastoch, A., Boning, C. W., Schwarzkopf, F. U. & Lutjeharms, J. R. E. Increase in Agulhas leakage due to poleward shift of Southern Hemisphere westerlies. Nature 462, 495–498 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Weijer, W., de Ruijter, W., Dijkstra, H. & van Leeuwen, P. Impact of interbasin exchange on the Atlantic overturning circulation. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 29, 2266–2284 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Biastoch, A., Boning, C. W. & Lutjeharms, J. R. E. Agulhas leakage dynamics affects decadal variability in Atlantic overturning circulation. Nature 456, 489–492 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sijp, W. & England, M. Southern Hemisphere westerly wind control over the ocean’s thermohaline circulation. J. Clim. 22, 1277–1286 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Meehl, G. A. et al. in IPCC Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis (eds Solomon, S. et al.) 747–845 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zickfeld, K., Fyfe, J., Saenko, O., Eby, M. & Weaver, A. Response of the global carbon cycle to human-induced changes in Southern Hemisphere winds. Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, L12712 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kidston, J. & Gerber, E. Intermodel variability of the poleward shift of the austral jet stream in the CMIP3 integrations linked to biases in 20th century climatology. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37, L09708 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Compo, G. P. et al. The twentieth century reanalysis project. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 137, 1–28 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kushner, P., Held, I. & Delworth, T. Southern Hemisphere atmospheric circulation response to global warming. J. Clim. 14, 2238–2249 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pacanowski, R. Mom 2 Documentation, User’s Guide and Reference Manual GFDL Ocean group Tech. Rep. 3 (NOAA/GFDL, 1995).

  23. Bryan, K. & Lewis, L. A water mass model of the world ocean. J. Geophys. Res. 84, 2503–2517 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gent, P. & McWilliams, J. Isopycnal mixing in ocean circulation models. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 20, 150–155 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Schmittner, A., Oschlies, A., Giraud, X., Eby, M. & Simmons, H. L. A global model of the marine ecosystem for long-term simulations: Sensitivity to ocean mixing, buoyancy forcing, particle sinking, and dissolved organic matter cycling. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 19, GB3004 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Meissner, K. J., Weaver, A. J., Matthews, H. D. & Cox, P. M. The role of land surface dynamics in glacial inception: A study with the UVic Earth System Model. Clim. Dyn. 21, 515–537 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Weber, S. L. et al. The modern and glacial overturning circulation in the Atlantic ocean in PMIP coupled model simulations. Clim. Past 3, 51–64 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

N.C.S. received financial support from the National Research Foundation of South Africa, and through the NSERC CREATE training programme in interdisciplinary climate science at the University of Victoria, Canada. We thank the UVic Climate Modelling Group, in particular M. Eby, A. Weaver and E. Wiebe, for help with the UVic ESCM. This research has been enabled by the use of computing resources provided by WestGrid and Compute/Calcul Canada. We acknowledge the modelling groups, the Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison and the WCRP’s Working Group on Coupled Modelling for their roles in making available the WCRP CMIP3 multi-model data set. Support of this data set is provided by the Office of Science, US Department of Energy. J. Christian, M. Eby, N. Gillet and J. Scinocca provided useful comments on an early draft of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J.C.F. conceived of the experiment, advised on the analysis, helped to interpret the results and edited the paper. N.C.S. designed the experiment, conducted the model runs, analysed the output, interpreted the results and wrote most of the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. C. Swart.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Swart, N., Fyfe, J. Ocean carbon uptake and storage influenced by wind bias in global climate models. Nature Clim Change 2, 47–52 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1289

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1289

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing AI and Robotics

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics newsletter — what matters in AI and robotics research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics