Article | Published:

Kinetochore kinesin CENP-E is a processive bi-directional tracker of dynamic microtubule tips

Nature Cell Biology volume 15, pages 10791088 (2013) | Download Citation

Abstract

During vertebrate mitosis, the centromere-associated kinesin CENP-E (centromere protein E) transports misaligned chromosomes to the plus ends of spindle microtubules. Subsequently, the kinetochores that form at the centromeres establish stable associations with microtubule ends, which assemble and disassemble dynamically. Here we provide evidence that after chromosomes have congressed and bi-oriented, the CENP-E motor continues to play an active role at kinetochores, enhancing their links with dynamic microtubule ends. Using a combination of single-molecule approaches and laser trapping in vitro, we demonstrate that once reaching microtubule ends, CENP-E converts from a lateral transporter into a microtubule tip-tracker that maintains association with both assembling and disassembling microtubule tips. Computational modelling of this behaviour supports our proposal that CENP-E tip-tracks bi-directionally through a tethered motor mechanism, which relies on both the motor and tail domains of CENP-E. Our results provide a molecular framework for the contribution of CENP-E to the stability of attachments between kinetochores and dynamic microtubule ends.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    , & Centromeres and kinetochores: from epigenetics to mitotic checkpoint signaling. Cell 112, 407–421 (2003).

  2. 2.

    & Kinetochores are transported poleward along a single astral microtubule during chromosome attachment to the spindle in newt lung cells. J. Cell Biol. 110, 81–95 (1990).

  3. 3.

    , , & Kinetochore dynein is required for chromosome motion and congression independent of the spindle checkpoint. Curr. Biol. 17, 973–980 (2007).

  4. 4.

    et al. CENP-E, a novel human centromere-associated protein required for progression from metaphase to anaphase. EMBO J. 10, 1245–1254 (1991).

  5. 5.

    et al. Chromosomes can congress to the metaphase plate before biorientation. Science 311, 388–391 (2006).

  6. 6.

    , , & CENP-E combines a slow, processive motor and a flexible coiled coil to produce an essential motile kinetochore tether. J. Cell Biol. 181, 411–419 (2008).

  7. 7.

    , , & Chromosome congression in the absence of kinetochore fibres. Nat. Cell Biol. 11, 832–838 (2009).

  8. 8.

    , , & Aurora kinases and protein phosphatase 1 mediate chromosome congression through regulation of CENP-E. Cell 142, 444–455 (2010).

  9. 9.

    , , , & CENP-E function at kinetochores is essential for chromosome alignment. J. Cell Biol. 139, 1373–1382 (1997).

  10. 10.

    , , & CENP-E is a plus end-directed kinetochore motor required for metaphase chromosome alignment. Cell 91, 357–366 (1997).

  11. 11.

    et al. Unstable kinetochore-microtubule capture and chromosomal instability following deletion of CENP-E. Dev. Cell 3, 351–365 (2002).

  12. 12.

    , , , & CENP-E forms a link between attachment of spindle microtubules to kinetochores and the mitotic checkpoint. Nat. Cell Biol. 2, 484–491 (2000).

  13. 13.

    et al. Antitumor activity of an allosteric inhibitor of centromere-associated protein-E. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 5839–5844 (2010).

  14. 14.

    , & The kinesin-like protein CENP-E is kinetochore-associated throughout poleward chromosome segregation during anaphase-A. J. Cell Sci. 109, 961–969 (1996).

  15. 15.

    , , & Localization of CENP-E in the fibrous corona and outer plate of mammalian kinetochores from prometaphase through anaphase. Chromosoma 106, 446–455 (1997).

  16. 16.

    et al. CENP-E is essential for reliable bioriented spindle attachment, but chromosome alignment can be achieved via redundant mechanisms in mammalian cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 12, 2776–2789 (2001).

  17. 17.

    et al. Centromere-associated protein-E is essential for the mammalian mitotic checkpoint to prevent aneuploidy due to single chromosome loss. J. Cell Biol. 162, 551–563 (2003).

  18. 18.

    , , , & Antibodies to the kinesin motor domain and CENP-E inhibit microtubule depolymerization-dependent motion of chromosomes in vitro. J. Cell Biol. 128, 107–115 (1995).

  19. 19.

    , , & Kinesin superfamily motor proteins and intracellular transport. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 682–696 (2009).

  20. 20.

    , & Chromosome-microtubule interactions during mitosis. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 18, 193–219 (2002).

  21. 21.

    , & Mechanisms of chromosome behaviour during mitosis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11, 91–102 (2010).

  22. 22.

    & The vertebrate cell kinetochore and its roles during mitosis. Trends Cell Biol. 8, 310–318 (1998).

  23. 23.

    et al. XMAP215 is a processive microtubule polymerase. Cell 132, 79–88 (2008).

  24. 24.

    et al. The Dam1 kinetochore ring complex moves processively on depolymerizing microtubule ends. Nature 440, 565–569 (2006).

  25. 25.

    , & The Dam1 complex confers microtubule plus end-tracking activity to the Ndc80 kinetochore complex. J. Cell Biol. 189, 641–649 (2010).

  26. 26.

    et al. Phosphorylation relieves autoinhibition of the kinetochore motor Cenp-E. Mol. Cell 29, 637–643 (2008).

  27. 27.

    , , , & Diffusive movement of processive kinesin-1 on microtubules. Traffic 10, 1429–1438 (2009).

  28. 28.

    , , , & The mitotic kinesin CENP-E is a processive transport motor. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 6016–6021 (2008).

  29. 29.

    , , & Kinesin’s tail domain is an inhibitory regulator of the motor domain. Nat. Cell Biol. 1, 288–292 (1999).

  30. 30.

    & Interhead tension determines processivity across diverse N-terminal kinesins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 16253–16258 (2011).

  31. 31.

    , , , & Mitotic kinesin CENP-E promotes microtubule plus-end elongation. Curr. Biol. 20, 1648–1653 (2010).

  32. 32.

    , , & Force production by disassembling microtubules. Nature 438, 384–388 (2005).

  33. 33.

    The effect of colchicine on the microscopic and submicroscopic structure of the mitotic spindle. Exp. Cell Res. 2 (suppl.), 305–318 (1952).

  34. 34.

    & Structure of microtubular crystals induced by vinblastine in vitro. J. Cell Biol. 44, 234–238 (1970).

  35. 35.

    , & Mitotic regulation of microtubule cross-linking activity of CENP-E kinetochore protein. Science 265, 394–398 (1994).

  36. 36.

    , & Characterization of the kinetochore binding domain of CENP-E reveals interactions with the kinetochore proteins CENP-F and hBUBR1. J. Cell Biol. 143, 49–63 (1998).

  37. 37.

    et al. CENP-meta, an essential kinetochore kinesin required for the maintenance of metaphase chromosome alignment in Drosophila. J. Cell Biol. 150, 1–11 (2000).

  38. 38.

    et al. Motor-independent targeting of CLASPs to kinetochores by CENP-E promotes microtubule turnover and poleward flux. Curr. Biol. 19, 1566–1572 (2009).

  39. 39.

    et al. Cdk1 and Plk1 mediate a CLASP2 phospho-switch that stabilizes kinetochore-microtubule attachments. J. Cell Biol. 199, 285–301 (2012).

  40. 40.

    et al. Microtubule plus-end tracking by CLIP-170 requires EB1. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 492–497 (2009).

  41. 41.

    et al. Phosphoregulation and depolymerization-driven movement of the Dam1 complex do not require ring formation. Nat. Cell Biol. 10, 407–414 (2008).

  42. 42.

    et al. Different assemblies of the DAM1 complex follow shortening microtubules by distinct mechanisms. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 6918–6923 (2008).

  43. 43.

    et al. A tethering mechanism controls the processivity and kinetochore-microtubule plus-end enrichment of the kinesin-8 Kif18A. Mol. Cell 43, 764–775 (2011).

  44. 44.

    et al. Mechanisms underlying the dual-mode regulation of microtubule dynamics by Kip3/kinesin-8. Mol. Cell 43, 751–763 (2011).

  45. 45.

    , , & A non-motor microtubule binding site is essential for the high processivity and mitotic function of kinesin-8 Kif18A. PLoS ONE 6, e27471 (2011).

  46. 46.

    et al. Kif18A uses a microtubule binding site in the tail for plus-end localization and spindle length regulation. Curr. Biol. 21, 1500–1506 (2011).

  47. 47.

    , , & Comprehensive BiophysicsVol. 4, 93–117 (Elsevier B.V, 2012).

  48. 48.

    et al. Preparation of modified tubulins. Meth. Enzymol. 196, 478–485 (1991).

  49. 49.

    , , & CENP-E as an essential component of the mitotic checkpoint in vitro. Cell 102, 817–826 (2000).

  50. 50.

    , , , & Effect of tau on the vinblastine-induced aggregation of tubulin. J. Cell Biol. 89, 680–683 (1981).

  51. 51.

    , , , & The depolymerizing kinesin MCAK uses lattice diffusion to rapidly target microtubule ends. Nature 441, 115–119 (2006).

  52. 52.

    et al. The Dam1 ring binds microtubules strongly enough to be a processive as well as energy-efficient coupler for chromosome motion. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 15423–15428 (2008).

  53. 53.

    & Force and velocity measured for single kinesin molecules. Cell 77, 773–784 (1994).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank members of the Grishchuk and Ataullakhanov laboratories for stimulating discussions and technical assistance, A. Korbalev for help with the model videos, M. Porter for a kind gift of axonemes, M. Ostap, M. Lampson and J. R. McIntosh for critical reading of the manuscript, and E. Ballister and M. Lampson for assistance with live cell imaging. We thank University of California, San Diego, Neuroscience Microscopy Shared Facility (P30 NS047101) and J. R. McIntosh for help with the initial phase of this work (GM 033787). This work has been supported by grants from the NIH to E.L.G. (R01-GM098389) and to D.W.C. (R01-GM29513), and grants to F.I.A from Russian Fund for Basic Research (12-04-00111-a, 13-04-40188-H and RFBR 13-04-40190-H) and Presidium of Russian Academy of Sciences (Mechanisms of the Molecular Systems Integration and Molecular and Cell Biology programmes). B.V. has been supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Human Frontiers Science Program. E.L.G. is a Kimmel Scholar; her work is supported in part by the Pennsylvania Muscle Institute. D.W.C. receives salary support from the Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research.

Author information

Author notes

    • Nikita Gudimchuk
    •  & Benjamin Vitre

    These authors contributed equally to this work

    • Yumi Kim

    Present address: Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94704, USA

Affiliations

  1. Physiology Department, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA

    • Nikita Gudimchuk
    • , Anatoly Kiyatkin
    •  & Ekaterina L. Grishchuk
  2. Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research and Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, USA

    • Benjamin Vitre
    • , Yumi Kim
    •  & Don W. Cleveland
  3. Center for Theoretical Problems of Physicochemical Pharmacology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 119991, Russian Federation

    • Fazly I. Ataullakhanov
  4. Federal Research and Clinical Centre of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow 117513, Russian Federation

    • Fazly I. Ataullakhanov

Authors

  1. Search for Nikita Gudimchuk in:

  2. Search for Benjamin Vitre in:

  3. Search for Yumi Kim in:

  4. Search for Anatoly Kiyatkin in:

  5. Search for Don W. Cleveland in:

  6. Search for Fazly I. Ataullakhanov in:

  7. Search for Ekaterina L. Grishchuk in:

Contributions

N.G. performed in vitro experiments and mathematical modelling; B.V. and A.K. performed in vivo experiments; B.V. and Y.K. purified proteins; N.G., B.V., F.I.A., D.W.C. and E.L.G. designed research, analysed data and wrote the paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ekaterina L. Grishchuk.

Integrated supplementary information

Supplementary tables

  1. 1.

    Interactions between CENP-E and microtubule lattice, as determined with single molecule TIRF and bead assays. Here and in other tables the numbers are Mean±SEM, N, where N is the total number of observed events. For the beads assay only data from the microscopy chambers in which no more than 30% beads were motile are included. When bead motility is that infrequent, more than 80% of moving beads are likely to be driven by single motor molecules53. The velocity of single truncated CENP-E molecules reported here is consistent with findings in28,30, but it is faster than in6 due to the differences in assay conditions.

  2. 2.

    Interactions between CENP-E and microtubule tips. Data reported here were obtained with complexes containing 1-2 CENP-E dimers. The association time with stable tips was examined using Taxol-stabilized microtubules. The association time and travel distance with polymerizing tips were determined from single exponential fits of the respective histograms (Supplementary Fig. S4 panels a,c, red curves). The association time and travel distance with the depolymerizing tips (Supplementary Fig. S4 panels b,d) and the association times with stable microtubule tips are reported as mean values. Time and distance of full-length CENP-E motility with microtubule disassembly are likely to be underestimated because they were frequently limited by a short microtubule length. NA– not applicable.

  3. 3.

    Model parameters. Our mathematical model contains 11 independent parameters: 5 kinetic parameters to describe the rate of the transitions between different states, as illustrated in Fig. 7a,b, and 6 mechanical parameters. For further details about specifying the values of model parameters and model calibration see Mathematical Model of CENP-E Motility in Supplementary Note.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Information

Excel files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Table 1

    Supplementary Information

  2. 2.

    Supplementary Table 2

    Supplementary Information

  3. 3.

    Supplementary Table 3

    Supplementary Information

Videos

  1. 1.

    Loss of chromosome alignment in cells with inhibited CENP-E.

    HeLa cells expressing Tubulin–EYFP and Histone H2B–RFP (natural colours are inverted in this video for better visualization) were released from the metaphase arrest in the presence (upper panel) or absence (lower panel) of the CENP-E inhibitor GSK-923295 at the beginning of these sequences, played at 4 fps, 480x faster than recorded. In bi-polar spindles with rigor-locked CENP-E, several chromosomes lose their alignment and become stuck at the poles, leading to a prolonged cell cycle arrest.

  2. 2.

    Truncated CENP-E carries a bead along Taxol-stabilized microtubules.

    At the start of this sequence, a 0.5 μm bead coated with TR CENP-E is held with a weak optical trap near a coverslip-attached Taxol-stabilized microtubule. A piezo-stage is then repositioned to promote the bead’s contact with the microtubule. When the bead starts walking, the trap is turned off to record the velocity and run length of the bead motions. In such assays, the TR-coated beads moved similarly to the beads coated with FL CENP-E, demonstrating that the non-motor domains have little effect on CENP-E traditional transport along a microtubule wall. Video was recorded in DIC at 7 fps and 100 millisec exposure, and played 2x faster than recorded. Scale bar, 2 μm.

  3. 3.

    Truncated CENP-E motors moving on a dynamic microtubule.

    Two TR CENP-E dimers sequentially land on the microtubule lattice and quickly walk to its growing plus end, where they detach readily. The microtubule then starts shortening, while another TR motor lands, walks and falls off the disassembling tip. Images were acquired with two-colour TIRF, so the microtubule is dimmer towards the plus end where it is farther away from the coverslip. The coverslip-attached Rhodamine-labeled microtubule seed is green, because Rhodamine is excited with a 488 nm laser. The 640 nm laser was used to visualize ‘red’ Hilyte-647 tubulin. Time-lapse image sequence was acquired at 2 fps, played 5x faster than recorded. Scale bar, 2 μm.

  4. 4.

    Motility of a full-length CENP-E dimer on a disassembling microtubule.

    A single FL CENP-E dimer reaches and then tracks with a disassembling microtubule end, exhibiting processive motility in both plus- and minus-end directions. Motions were recorded as in Supplementary Video S3 but continuously at 100 millisec per channel, and played 5x faster than recorded. Scale bar, 2 μm.

  5. 5.

    Motility of full-length CENP-E complexes on a dynamic microtubule.

    A FL CENP-E tetramer lands on the microtubule lattice, reaches a growing tip and stays tip-associated during the phases of growth and shortening. Another FL CENP-E complex, likely to be a single dimer, joins the first complex as it tracks with the disassembling end, until both get stuck to the coverslip surface (see Supplementary Fig. S3b, left panel, for the respective kymograph). Motions were recorded as in Supplementary Video S4, and played 3.3x faster than recorded. Scale bar, 2 μm.

  6. 6.

    Motility of a full-length CENP-E dimer on a growing microtubule.

    Arrow points to a single FL CENP-E dimer walking to a growing microtubule tip. Subsequently, the arrow’s position is fixed; the GFP-labelled protein continues to move slowly with microtubule polymerization, while displaying visible diffusion near the tip (see Fig. 8c for the respective kymograph). This sequence was recorded using only a 488 nm laser, which excites both green and red fluorescence, subsequently separated using different emission. The coverslip-attached microtubule seed is seen as brighter red, because of a higher proportion of Rhodamine-labeled tubulin. Video is played 2x faster than recorded. Scale bar, 2 μm.

  7. 7.

    Long-lasting association of full-length CENP-E with a dynamic microtubule tip.

    A complex of 3–4 FL CENP-E dimers tracks a dynamic microtubule tip for several phases of microtubule growth and shortening. Motions were recorded as in Supplementary Video S6, and played 20x faster than recorded. Scale bar, 2 μm.

  8. 8.

    Lack of coupling between beads coated with truncated CENP-E and depolymerizing microtubule end.

    Motor-coated bead (0.5 μm) walks to the plus end of a microtubule, which was grown from a coverslip-attached axoneme and stabilized temporarily with a GMPCPP-containing, Rhodamine-labelled cap (arrowhead). With bright illumination, the Rhodamine-labelled microtubule cap is destroyed (images in red), triggering microtubule depolymerization and subsequent bead detachment. Time-lapse images were acquired with low-light DIC, so individual microtubules are hard to discern. Video was recorded at 1 fps with 60 millisec exposure, played 7.5x faster than recorded.

  9. 9.

    Processive motion of the bead coated with full-length CENP-E towards the microtubule plus and then minus end.

    This video shows an analogous experiment to that in Supplementary Video S8 but with the bead coated with FL CENP-E. The bead is seen moving on the microtubule wall towards the microtubule plus end, but when the microtubule begins to shorten, the bead moves in the minus-end direction in conjunction with microtubule disassembly. Arrow marks the initial position of the bead. Played 15x faster than recorded.

  10. 10.

    Live imaging of microtubule destabilization assay in cells with monopolar spindles.

    This video shows maximal projections of 3 confocal slices (0.5 μm per step) of HeLa cells expressing Mis12–GFP (kinetochore marker). Cells were treated with monastrol to create the mitotic configuration in which chromosomes are gathered in a rosette around the unseparated poles. Microtubule depolymerization was induced by nocodazole at the beginning of these two sequences and motions of the kinetochores were recorded every 10 sec for 5 min. The inward chromosome motion is greatly reduced in the cell treated with CENP-E inhibitor. Video is played 150x faster than recorded and repeated 3 times. Scale bar, 5 μm.

  11. 11.

    Computer model of the motility of a full-length CENP-E dimer on a growing microtubule.

    Motor domains are shown in blue and orange, CENP-E tails are pink and the coiled coil is grey. To simplify calculations, the motor walks along the same protofilament as the diffusing tail. Fluctuations in the length of microtubule protofilaments reflect fast tubulin exchange at the microtubule tip. This sequence shows the molecular events at a millisecond timescale, when microtubule elongation and motor walking appear much slower relative to the tubulin exchange and the diffusion and binding/unbinding of the tail. After reaching the end of the protofilament track, the motor domains dissociate rapidly (with the rate of tubulin exchange) but remain tethered to the microtubule lattice via the diffusing tail. The tail’s residency time on the microtubule lattice is 0.5 sec, whereas the motor re-binding to the lattice takes only 1 millisec, so the motor is highly likely to resume the plus-end-directed motion before the tail loses its microtubule association. Calculations were carried out with parameter values specified in Table S3 and with a 20 μsec time step; only 1 out of every 50 frames is shown. Video is played at 10 fps, so 1 sec of the video corresponds to 10 millisec of the ‘model’ time.

  12. 12.

    Computer model of the motility of full-length CENP-E dimer on a dynamic microtubule.

    This simulation is for a longer time than in Supplementary Video S11, and it is played ‘faster’ to show the relatively slow processes of microtubule elongation, shortening and CENP-E tip-tracking. For simplicity, the elongating and shortening microtubule ends were modeled similarly, but with different constants of tubulin exchange. The CENP-E motor repeatedly walks to the end of the protofilament and detaches, but it remains tethered and quickly resumes its walking. This ‘tethered motor’ tip-tracking mechanism requires both the motor and tail CENP-E domains, but it does not require that the CENP-E can discriminate between the microtubule wall and its growing or shortening ends. The video was generated as Supplementary Video S11, but only 1 out of every 2,500 frames is shown at 10 fps.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2831

Further reading