Are university researchers at risk for patent infringement?

Academic researchers have regularly ignored patents on key technologies as a strategy to maneuver around patent thickets and freedom-to-operate issues, but they may be more at risk than they realize.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1

    Merges, R.P. & Duffy, J.F. Patent Law and Policy: Cases and Materials 3rd edn. 2–3 (LexisNexus, Mathew Bender, 2002).

  2. 2

    The Patent Act, 35 US Code.

  3. 3

    Diamond v. Chakrabarty, 447 US 303 (1980).

  4. 4

    Pray, C. Oehmke, J.F. & Naseem, A. AgBioForum 8, 52–63 (2005).

  5. 5

    Shapiro, C. Navigating the patent thicket: cross licenses, patent pools, and standard-setting (paper presented at Innovation Policy and the Economy, Washington, DC; 1–4 April 2000).

  6. 6

    Cukier, K. Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 249–251 (2006).

  7. 7

    Graff, G.D. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 21, 989–995 (2003).

  8. 8

    Hansen, S.A., Kisielewski, M.R. & Asher, J.L. Intellectual property experiences in the United States scientific community (a report by the Project on Science and Intellectual Property in the Public Interest; 2007).

  9. 9

    Walsh, J., Cho, C. & Cohen, W.M. Patents, material transfers and access to Research inputs in biomedical research (Final Report to the National Academy of Sciences' Committee Intellectual Property Rights in Genomic and Protein-Related Research Inventions; 2005).

  10. 10

    Pray, C.E. & Naseem, A. AgBioForum 8, 108–117 (2005).

  11. 11

    Mentewab, A. & Stewart, C.N. Jr. Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 1177–1180 (2005).

  12. 12

    Stewart, C.N. Jr. Open-source agriculture. ISB News Report, December, 1–4 (2005).

  13. 13

    National Research Council, Committee on Intellectual Property Rights in Genomic and Protein Research and Innovation. Reaping the benefits of genomic and proteomic research: intellectual property rights, innovation, and public health. The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C. (2005).

  14. 14

    Andrews, L. et al. Science 314, 1395–1396 (2006).

  15. 15

    35 USC § 200.

  16. 16

    Boettiger S. & Bennett, A. Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 320–323 (2006).

  17. 17

    Madey v. Duke University, 307 F.3d 1351 (2002).

  18. 18

    Florida Prepaid v. College Savings Bank, 527 U.S. 627 (1999).

  19. 19

    Malakoff, D. Science 289, 2267–2269 (2000).

  20. 20

    Gillam, C. University group sues Monsanto over soybean patent. Reuters May 23 (2007).

  21. 21

    KSR International v. Teleflex, Inc., 550 US ___ (2007).

  22. 22

    Samardzija, M.R. Science 315, 190–191 (2007).

  23. 23

    Anonymous. Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 633 (2005).

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Bill Park and Stacey Patterson for helpful discussions and comments on earlier drafts.

Author information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yancey, A., Stewart, C. Are university researchers at risk for patent infringement?. Nat Biotechnol 25, 1225–1228 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1107-1225

Download citation

Further reading