Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Are university researchers at risk for patent infringement?

Academic researchers have regularly ignored patents on key technologies as a strategy to maneuver around patent thickets and freedom-to-operate issues, but they may be more at risk than they realize.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1

    Merges, R.P. & Duffy, J.F. Patent Law and Policy: Cases and Materials 3rd edn. 2–3 (LexisNexus, Mathew Bender, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    The Patent Act, 35 US Code.

  3. 3

    Diamond v. Chakrabarty, 447 US 303 (1980).

  4. 4

    Pray, C. Oehmke, J.F. & Naseem, A. AgBioForum 8, 52–63 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Shapiro, C. Navigating the patent thicket: cross licenses, patent pools, and standard-setting (paper presented at Innovation Policy and the Economy, Washington, DC; 1–4 April 2000).

  6. 6

    Cukier, K. Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 249–251 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Graff, G.D. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 21, 989–995 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Hansen, S.A., Kisielewski, M.R. & Asher, J.L. Intellectual property experiences in the United States scientific community (a report by the Project on Science and Intellectual Property in the Public Interest; 2007).

  9. 9

    Walsh, J., Cho, C. & Cohen, W.M. Patents, material transfers and access to Research inputs in biomedical research (Final Report to the National Academy of Sciences' Committee Intellectual Property Rights in Genomic and Protein-Related Research Inventions; 2005).

  10. 10

    Pray, C.E. & Naseem, A. AgBioForum 8, 108–117 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Mentewab, A. & Stewart, C.N. Jr. Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 1177–1180 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Stewart, C.N. Jr. Open-source agriculture. ISB News Report, December, 1–4 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    National Research Council, Committee on Intellectual Property Rights in Genomic and Protein Research and Innovation. Reaping the benefits of genomic and proteomic research: intellectual property rights, innovation, and public health. The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C. (2005).

  14. 14

    Andrews, L. et al. Science 314, 1395–1396 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    35 USC § 200.

  16. 16

    Boettiger S. & Bennett, A. Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 320–323 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Madey v. Duke University, 307 F.3d 1351 (2002).

  18. 18

    Florida Prepaid v. College Savings Bank, 527 U.S. 627 (1999).

  19. 19

    Malakoff, D. Science 289, 2267–2269 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Gillam, C. University group sues Monsanto over soybean patent. Reuters May 23 (2007).

  21. 21

    KSR International v. Teleflex, Inc., 550 US ___ (2007).

  22. 22

    Samardzija, M.R. Science 315, 190–191 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Anonymous. Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 633 (2005).

Download references


Thanks to Bill Park and Stacey Patterson for helpful discussions and comments on earlier drafts.

Author information



Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yancey, A., Stewart, C. Are university researchers at risk for patent infringement?. Nat Biotechnol 25, 1225–1228 (2007).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing