News Feature | Published:

Under wraps

Nature Biotechnology volume 27, pages 880882 (2009) | Download Citation

Are the crop industry's strong-arm tactics and close-fisted attitude to sharing seeds holding back independent research and undermining public acceptance of transgenic crops? Emily Waltz investigates.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    & Biotechnol. Genet. Eng. Rev. 21, 299–324 (2004).

  2. 2.

    Ecol. Appl. 12, 1119–1124 (2002).

  3. 3.

    et al. Science 316, 1475–1477 (2007).

  4. 4.

    Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 47, 721–733 (2007).

  5. 5.

    Committee on Environmental Impact Associated with Commercialization of Transgenic Plants, National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences. Environmental Effects of Transgenic Plants: The Scope and Adequacy of Regulation (The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2002).

Download references

Author information


  1. Nashville

    • Emily Waltz


  1. Search for Emily Waltz in:

About this article

Publication history



Further reading

Newsletter Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing