Abstract
A risk-based approach to rationalizing field trial regulations.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
The evolving EU regulatory framework for precision breeding
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Open Access 17 October 2018
-
Time for a New EU Regulatory Framework for GM Crops?
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Open Access 01 June 2017
-
Regulatory hurdles for genome editing: process- vs. product-based approaches in different regulatory contexts
Plant Cell Reports Open Access 03 May 2016
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Udelman, M. et al. 1994. Feeding 10 Billion People in 2050: A Report by the Action Group on Food Security. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC.
Miller, H.I. 1997. Chapters 2 and 4 in Policy Controversy in Biotechnology: An Insider's View, Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
Huttner, S.L. 1995. overnment, researchers and activists: The crucial public policy interface, pp. 459–494 in Biotechnology, Vol. 12, Brauer, D. (ed.). VCH, Weinheim, Germany.
Anon. 1989. Field Testing Genetically Modified Organisms: Framework for Decisions. Washington DC, National Academy Press.
Miller, H.I., Altman, D.W., Barton, J.H. and Huttner, S.L. 1995. Biotechnology oversight in developing countries: A risk-based algorithm. Bio/Technology 13: 955–958.
Frommer, W., Ager, B., Archer, L. et al. 1989. Safe biotechnology: III. Safety precautions for handling microorganisms of different risk classes. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 30: 541–548.
Anon. 1988. Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories. Centers for Disease Control/National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health & Human Services. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
Anon. 1987. Introduction of Recombinant DMA-Engineered Organisms into the Environment: Key Issues. Washington, DC, National Academy Press.
Miller, M. and Aplet, G. Biological control: A little knowledge is a dangerous thing. Rutgers Law Rev. 45: 285–334.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barton, J., Crandon, J., Kennedy, D. et al. A model protocol to assess the risks of agricultural introductions. Nat Biotechnol 15, 845–848 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0997-845
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0997-845
This article is cited by
-
The evolving EU regulatory framework for precision breeding
Theoretical and Applied Genetics (2019)
-
Time for a New EU Regulatory Framework for GM Crops?
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics (2017)
-
A risk-based approach to the regulation of genetically engineered organisms
Nature Biotechnology (2016)
-
Regulatory hurdles for genome editing: process- vs. product-based approaches in different regulatory contexts
Plant Cell Reports (2016)
-
Regulating transgenic crops sensibly: lessons from plant breeding, biotechnology and genomics
Nature Biotechnology (2005)