Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Protozoan genomics for drug discovery

Comparing the metabolic pathways of parasites and their hosts facilitates the identification of new drug targets.

As the world grows smaller through increasing economic integration and travel, health is becoming a global issue, particularly in the realm of infectious diseases. Infection with microorganisms now has international repercussions, as seen in the emergence of AIDS, SARS and avian influenza; the spread of antibiotic-resistant malaria, tuberculosis and nosocomial infections; and bioterrorism concerns. A series of papers in recent issues of Science report the complete genome sequences of five important protozoan parasites: two species of Theileria1,2, which cause East Coast fever and theileriosis in cattle, and three members of the phylum Kinetoplastida—Leishmania major3, which leads to skin lesions (and is related to L. donovani, which causes visceral leishmaniasis); Trypanosoma brucei4, which produces sleeping sickness in humans and wasting disease in cattle; and T. cruzi5, the cause of Chagas disease. Comparative study of the genomes of these and other parasites promises to elucidate the biology of many devastating tropical diseases and help identify parasite-specific targets for drug development.

Parasitic organisms are a major cause of disease worldwide, but because they are concentrated in poorer parts of the world, they receive relatively little attention from the pharmaceutical industry and major scientific funding agencies. Of the ten diseases targeted as research priorities by the World Health Organization's Special Program for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (http://www.who.int/tdr/), one is caused by a virus (dengue fever), two by bacterial pathogens (leprosy, tuberculosis), three by helminth parasites (filariasis, onchocerciasis, schistosomiasis) and four by protozoan parasites (malaria, leishmaniasis, Chagas disease, African trypanosomiasis). Malaria alone affects over 500 million individuals annually, with 1–3 million deaths6. Beyond their direct effects on human health, parasites such as Theileria and Trypanosoma brucei also exert a significant economic impact as veterinary pathogens of agriculturally important animals.

The five new genome sequences complement previously reported sequences of other apicomplexan parasites, including Plasmodium falciparum (malaria)7, several rodent malaria-causing species8,9, and Cryptosporidium parvum and C. hominis10,11. The sequences of Plasmodium vivax (http://www.tigr.org), Toxoplasma gondii (http://ToxoDB.org) and Eimeria tenella (http://www.sanger.ac.uk) are approaching completion. The genome of the amitochondrial eukaryote Entamoeba histolytica has also been published recently12, and sequencing of the Giardia lamblia (http://www.mbl.edu/Giardia) and Trichomonas vaginalis (http://www.tigr.org) genomes is in progress. In aggregate, this work helps fulfill a decade-old proposal to sequence all major parasitic pathogens, providing “the sequence of every virulence determinant, every protein antigen, and every drug target, for all time”13. But how is this information to be exploited to produce new therapeutics?

The development of drugs, vaccines and diagnostics can be pursued from an evolutionary perspective, taking advantage of comparative genomics to identify and exploit characteristics that distinguish pathogen and host. Contrary to popular opinion, there is no shortage of effective antibiotics, but those that kill the patient are not particularly useful! From this perspective, eukaryotic pathogens pose a more difficult challenge than prokaryotes, as they share many metabolic pathways with humans. For example, macrolides, tetracylines and many other inhibitors of prokaryotic protein synthesis do not inhibit cytoplasmic protein synthesis in eukaryotic parasites (but see below for a surprising twist on this story), and β-lactam antibiotics—specific inhibitors of bacterial cell-wall synthesis—are not active against eukaryotic pathogens, which lack a cell wall.

Building on available sequence data, phylogenetic analysis has defined five supergroups of eukaryotes (Fig. 1): the plant and red/green algal lineage; a clade comprised of animals, fungi, slime molds and amoebozoans; and three groups that are entirely protozoan14. The chromalveolates include the parasitic phylum apicomplexa (dark red), along with ciliates, diatoms and many taxa for which no complete genomes are available; excavates include the kinetoplastid parasites (dark blue) and other lineages (many anaerobic and/or parasitic). The availability of multiple apicomplexan and kinetoplastid sequences provide a rich resource for examining the evolution and biology of these pathogens and for developing antimicrobial agents based on parasite-specific targets.

Figure 1: Eukaryotic genome projects.
figure1

Bob Crimi

Effectively complete genomes are available or in preparation for each of the taxa shown; parentheses indicate availability of genomes for multiple species. Asterisks indicate genome sequences of parasitic organisms; crosses indicate taxa in which some of the available genomes are derived from parasites (in other cases related species are parasitic, e.g., Naegleria fowleri, Tetrahymena pyroformis). Shaded boxes represent five distinct eukaryotic groups; the precise relationship among these lineages, and where they diverged from prokaryotes, is uncertain14. The vast majority of eukaryotic diversity is protozoan, and most of the sequenced protozoa are parasitic. Recent publications report the genomes of kinetoplastida3,4,5,16 (Trypanosoma brucei, T. cruzi, Leishmania; dark blue) and apicomplexans1,2,6,7,8,9,10 (including Theileria, Plasmodium, Toxoplasma and Cryptosporidium; red).

Species- or genus-specific genes may help define unique aspects of parasite life-history strategies15,16, such as the striking lymphoproliferation induced by Theileria17 or the cytoadherence of erythrocytes infected by Plasmodium falciparum18—effects that underlie parasite virulence. Among the Kinetoplastida16, Leishmania is an intracellular parasite that has adapted to survival within the lysosomes of professional phagocytic cells (macrophages), whereas T. cruzi, another intracellular parasite, escapes into the cytoplasm. T. brucei lives in the blood, using its spectacular antigenic variability to evade the immune response19. More ancient taxon-specific features offer the prospect of developing broad-spectrum antiparasitic agents, such as inhibitors that block endocytosis through the distinctive flagellar pocket of kinteoplastid parasites20,21 or that inhibit the establishment or function of the intracellular parasitophorous vacuole within which most apicomplexans reside22.

Comparative genomic analysis identifies significant differences between parasites and their host or vector species. Metabolic pathways have traditionally provided attractive targets for drug deveopment and are therefore of particular interest4. Many parasites have dispensed with pathways that are essential for free-living organisms. For example, all parasites are purine auxotrophs, and the consequent dependence on salvage pathways underlies the use of allopurinol as a treatment for leishmaniasis (a toxic purine analog). In contrast, most parasites have lost the ability to salvage pyrimidines, relying on de novo pyrimidine biosynthesis—the target of sulfonamides. (Only Cryptoporidium can salvage pyrimidines, as discussed below.) All apicomplexan and kinetoplastid parasites also lack at least some components of the urea cycle, and several (Theileria, Cryptosporidium, trypanosomes) have lost the ability to synthesize heme. Theileria and Toxoplasma are unable to synthesize polyamines, and Cryptosporidium has even eliminated the TCA cycle.

Parasites have also developed several alternative strategies for sterol and lipid synthesis23. The Kinetoplastida synthesize isopentenyl pyrophosphate using HMG-CoA reductase, but they then convert squalene to ergosterol rather than cholesterol, providing a promising target for chemotherapeutic intervention. Antifungal agents already in the clinic (triazole inhibitors of C14α sterol demethylase) provide lead compounds against protozoan parasites. Apicomplexan parasites lack the HMG-CoA reductase pathway, but most are capable of synthesizing isoprenoids through the 1-deoxy-D-xylulose 5-phosphate (DOXP) pathway, which is attractive as the target of known herbicides24. Plasmodium, Toxoplasma and all of the kinetoplastids synthesize fatty acids using a type II fatty acyl synthase (FAS) complex, the target of triclosan and other antibiotics23. In contrast, Cryptosporidium, like humans, employs FAS-I. Surprisingly, the Toxoplasma genome encodes both FAS-I and FAS-II, whereas the Theileria genome has neither.

Striking differences also exist in parasite metabolism of amino acids. As shown in Figure 2, human cells synthesize 10 amino acids (green boxes), via the enzymatic steps indicated as green arrows above. Remarkably, each of these pathways is missing in one or more of the kinetoplastid or apicomplexan parasites (white arrows), resulting in many distinct patterns of auxotrophy (Fig. 2, blue boxes). Parasites with the most reduced genomes (Cryptosporidium, Theileria) have lost multiple pathways and presumably compensate by using proteases and permeases evident in their genomes. Another convenient parasitic strategy involves salvage from the host. Plasmodium, for example, eats hemoglobin, and the specialized proteases responsible for this activity provide a possible drug target25.

Figure 2: Comparative genomics reveals nutritional and metabolic diversity.
figure2

Bob Crimi

Humans require 10 amino acids in their diet (gray), and synthesize the remaining 10 (green) using the metabolic pathways indicated (green arrows). Each of the amino acid biosynthetic pathways found in humans is diminished or absent in one or more kinetoplastid and/or apicomplexan species (white arrows; compare with the green arrows above), resulting in distinct auxotrophic requirements (blue). Some parasites exhibit biosynthetic capabilities not found in humans (red arrows), reducing their dependence on salvage from the environment (pink). Parasite-specific pathways—often acquired by horizontal transfer from algae or bacteria27,28—provide attractive targets for drug development.

In some cases, gene losses within a single lineage account for the observed distribution of amino acid auxotrophy, as in the loss of enzymes that convert methionine to cysteine in all of the apicomplexans. In other cases, multiple independent losses are more likely, as in the loss of phenylalanine hydroxylase in the trypanosomes, the Plasmodium-Theileria lineage and Cryptosporidium. A gene encoding this enzyme appears to have been retained in the Leishmania genome, although its activity may be insufficient to meet all of the parasite's needs26.

Parasite genomes also reveal metabolic pathways that are lacking in humans1,2,3,4,5,7,8,9,10,11,12, including pathways for amino acid biosynthesis (Fig. 2, red arrows). The Kinetoplastida can synthesize cysteine from serine, and both methionine and threonine from aspartate semialdehyde. Cryptosporidium can metabolize serine to tryptophan, and Toxoplasma harbors the entire diaminopimelate pathway, enabling conversion of aspartate to lysine.

In many cases, such parasite-specific pathways bear a striking resemblance to prokaryotic metabolism, and phylogenetic reconstruction suggests their acquisition by horizontal gene transfer. For example, several genes in the glycolytic pathway and TCA cycle of kinetoplastids (including, GAPDH and isocitrate dehydrogenase) exhibit close phylogenetic affinity to bacterial orthologs4,16. As noted above, Cryptosporidium is highly unusual among protozoan parasites in expressing a thymidine kinase, suggesting a new way to target this devastating diarrheal disease–causing pathogen, for which no effective treatment exists.

The genes encoding tryptophan synthase (β subunit), thymidine kinase, IMPDH and several other proteins in Cryptosporidium appear to be derived from a eubacterial ancestor27. Such transfers are far more common in protozoa than in 'higher' eukaryotes, particularly in intestinal parasites such as Cryptosporidium. It may be that the coexistence of these pathogens with diverse gut flora provides a suitable environment for horizontal transfer. Overall, lateral gene transfer has significantly shaped the metabolic repertoire of protozoan parasites.

Perhaps the most intriguing instance of horizontal transfer is that of the apicomplexan plastid, or “apicoplast,” a secondary endosymbiotic organelle acquired when an ancient chromalveolate engulfed (or was invaded by) a eukaryotic alga and retained the algal plastid as a distinct organelle28. The apicoplast has lost all photosynthetic function but is nevertheless essential for parasite survival29 (except in Cryptosporidium, which has lost this organelle, but has retained several plant-like enzymes that may derive from the algal endosymbiont30). Approximately 15% of the P. falciparum genome encodes proteins destined for the apicoplast6, including those involved in producing isoprenoids and fatty acids through the DOXP and FAS-II pathways; in addition, the apicoplast has a crucial role in compartmentalizing heme biosynthesis31. Housekeeping enzymes associated with this organelle are particularly attractive as drug targets, as apicoplast DNA replication, RNA transcription and protein synthesis are all prokaryotic in nature, providing targets for drugs such as ciprofloxacin, rifamycin and clindamycin (used clinically to treat toxoplasmosis)29,31.

Genome sequences are being deciphered at an ever-increasing rate, with each new entry providing numerous opportunities for comparison with those already available. Comparative genomics applications are now driving the development of new bioinformatics tools32, making it possible to map entire metabolic pathways in silico and complementing methods for genetic, cell biological, biochemical and pharmacological validation at the bench33,34,35 and in the clinic. Such advances are bound to expedite the development of new drugs for old pathogens.

References

  1. 1

    Gardner, M.J. et al. Science 309, 134–137 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Pain, A. et al. Science 309, 131–133 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Ivens, A.C. et al. Science 309, 436–442 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Berriman, M. et al. Science 309, 416–422 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    El-Sayed, N.M. et al. Science 309, 409–415 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Snow, R.W. et al. Nature 434, 214–217 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Gardner, M.J. et al. Nature 419, 498–511 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Carlton, J.M. et al. Nature 419, 512–519 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Hall, N. et al. Science 307, 82–86 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Abrahamsen, M.S. et al. Science 304, 441–445 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Xu, P. et al. Nature 431, 1107–1112 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Loftus, B. et al. Nature 433, 865–868 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Bloom, B.R. Nature 378, 236 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Keeling, P.J. et al. Trends Ecol. Evol. (in the press).

  15. 15

    Roos, D.S. Science 309, 72–73 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    El-Sayed, N.M. et al. Science 309, 404–409 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Dobbeleare, D.A. & Kuenzi, P. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 16, 524–530 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Craig, A. & Scherf, A. Molec. Biochem. Parasitol. 115, 129–143 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Borst, P. Cell 109, 5–8 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Overath, P. & Engstler, M. Molec. Microbiol. 53, 735–744 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Gull, K. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 6, 365–370 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Sibley, L.D. Science 304, 248–253 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Roberts, C.W. et al. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 126, 129–142 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Borrman, S. et al. J. Infect. Dis. 190, 1534–1540 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Klemba, M. & Goldberg, D.E. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 71, 275–305 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Steiger, R.F. & Steiger, E. J. Protozool. 24, 437–441 (1977).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Striepen, B. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 3154–3159 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Roos, D.S. et al. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2, 426–432 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Fichera, M.E. & Roos, D.S. Nature 389, 407–409 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Zhu, G. et al. Microbiol. 146, 315–321 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Ralph, S.A. et al. Nature Rev. Microbiol. 2, 203–216 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Li, L. et al. Genome Res. 13, 2178–2190 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Beverley, S.M. Nature Rev. Genet. 4, 11–19 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Roos, D.S. et al. Methods Cell Biol. 45, 27–63 (1994).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Carvalho, T.G. & Menard, R. Curr. Issues Molec. Biol. 7, 39–55 (2005).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chaudhary, K., Roos, D. Protozoan genomics for drug discovery. Nat Biotechnol 23, 1089–1091 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0905-1089

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing