Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Patents
  • Published:

Australia experiments with 'experimental use' exemption

Nature Biotechnology volume 22, pages 1023–1025 (2004)Cite this article

Lawmakers are asking whether Australian researchers need an express 'experimental use' defense against patent infringement.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Ducor, P. Nat. Biotechnol. 17, 1027–1028 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 307 F3d 1351 (2002). The US Supreme Court refused an appeal in June 2003.

  3. See for example section 60(5)(b), Patents Act 1977 (UK); Article 11.2 Patent Act (Germany), in force since 1981.

  4. Section 55.2(6), Patent Act 1985 (Canada).

  5. See Monsanto Co. v. Stauffer Chemical Co. (NZ) [1984] FSR 559; Smith Kline & French Laboratories Ltd v. Attorney-General (NZ) [1991] 2 NZLR 560.

  6. Australian Law Reform Commission. Issues Paper 27, December 2002 (http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/other/alrc/publications/issues/27) at 226.

  7. ALRC. Discussion Paper 68, February 2004 (http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/other/alrc/publications/dp68).

  8. Advisory Council on Intellectual Property. Patents and Experimental Use Issues Paper, February 2004 (http://www.acip.gov.au/library/patentsexpuse.PDF).

  9. Dwyer, J.W., Dufty, A., Lahore, J. & Garnsey, J. Patents, Trade Marks & Related Rights (Butterworths, Sydney; 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Discussion Paper 68, at 408.

  11. Ludwig, S.P. & Chumney, J.C. Nat. Biotechnol. 21, 453 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Walsh, J.P., Arora, A. & Cohen, W.M. Effects of research tool patents and licensing on biomedical innovation, in Patents in the Knowledge-Based Economy (eds Cohen, W. M. & Merrill, S.) 285–340 (National Academy Press, Washington; 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Walsh, J.P., Arora, A. & Cohen, W.M. Science 299, 1021 (14 February 2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lanjouw, J.O. & Schankerman M. Enforcement of patent rights in the United States, in Patents in the Knowledge-Based Economy (eds. Cohen, W.M. & Merrill, S.) 143–179 (National Academy Press, Washington, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  15. See for example the arguments on sections 9 and 13 of the Patents Act in the ALRC Discussion Paper, 378–389; and in the ACIP Issues Paper, 1.

  16. 9 ChD 48 (1876).

  17. Anaesthetic Supplies Pty Ltd v. Rescare Ltd (1994) 28 IPR 383 at 399 per Lockhart J. Emphasis added.

  18. See Michel, S. 7 High Technol. L.J. 369–398 (1992). See also Heller, M. & Eisenberg, R. Science 280, 698–700 (1998); Eisenberg R. 56 Univ. Chicago L.R. 1056 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Issues Paper 27, at 224. Emphasis in original.

  20. Discussion Paper 68, at 398, 400, 412.

  21. Id. at 408.

  22. Id. at 409–410.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. T.C. Beirne School of Law, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

    Amanda McBratney

  2. IMBcom Pty Ltd, Brisbane, Australia

    Katherine Nielsen & Fiona McMillan

Authors
  1. Amanda McBratney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Katherine Nielsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fiona McMillan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McBratney, A., Nielsen, K. & McMillan, F. Australia experiments with 'experimental use' exemption. Nat Biotechnol 22, 1023–1025 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0804-1023

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0804-1023

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing