Population genetics research collaborations are reaching increasingly across national boundaries to access human tissue repositories. Will discrepancies in national policies on informed consent and IP rights hinder progress?
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Qualitative study of knowledge and attitudes to biobanking among lay persons in Nigeria
BMC Medical Ethics Open Access 16 October 2012
-
A trial of consent procedures for future research with clinically derived biological samples
British Journal of Cancer Open Access 29 September 2009
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Change history
01 July 2005
Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 539–545 (2005) In Table 1, page 540, the source of funding for the Singapore Tissue Network was given as the “Singapore Biomedical Research Council, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Ministry of Health and the Genome Institute of Singapore.” It should have read the “Singapore's Biomedical Research Council of the Agency for Science Technology and Research.
References
Eiseman, E. & Haga, S.B. Handbook of Human Tissue Sources: A National Resource of Human Tissue Samples (RAND, Santa Monica, CA, 1999).
Bouchie, A. Coming soon—a global grid for cancer research. Nat. Biotechnol. 22, 1071–1073 (2004).
Árnason, V. Coding and consent: moral challenges of the database project in Iceland. Bioethics 18, 27–49 (2004).
Godard, B. et al. Strategies for consulting with the community: the cases of four large-scale genetic databases. Science and Engineering Ethics 10, 457–477 (2004).
Moore v. Regents of the University of California, 793 P.2d 479 (Cal. 1990).
Greenberg v. Miami Children's Hosp. Research Inst., Inc., 64 F. Supp. 2d 1064 (S.D.Fla. 2003).
Árnason, E. Personal identifiability in the Icelandic Health Sector Database. J. Inform. Law Technol. 2, (2002). http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/elj/jilt/2002_2/arnason/
Kaye, J. et al. Population genetic databases: a comparative analysis of the law in Iceland, Sweden, Estonia, and the UK. Trames 8, 15–13 (2004).
Bauer, K. et al. Ethical issues in tissue banking for research: a brief review of existing organizational policies. Theor. Med. Bioethics 25, 113–142 (2004).
Maschke, K.J. & Murray, T.H. Ethical issues in tissue banking for research: the prospects and pitfalls of setting international standards. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25, 142–155 (2004).
Andrews, L. Future Perfect: Confronting Decisions about Genetics (Columbia University Press, NY, 2002).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maschke, K. Navigating an ethical patchwork—human gene banks. Nat Biotechnol 23, 539–545 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0505-539
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0505-539
This article is cited by
-
Qualitative study of knowledge and attitudes to biobanking among lay persons in Nigeria
BMC Medical Ethics (2012)
-
The Bio-PIN: a concept to improve biobanking
Nature Reviews Cancer (2011)
-
Biobanking and public health: is a human rights approach the tie that binds?
Human Genetics (2011)
-
Biobanks: Importance, Implications and Opportunities for Genetic Counselors
Journal of Genetic Counseling (2010)
-
A trial of consent procedures for future research with clinically derived biological samples
British Journal of Cancer (2009)