Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Feature
  • Published:

Navigating an ethical patchwork—human gene banks

An Erratum to this article was published on 01 July 2005

This article has been updated

Population genetics research collaborations are reaching increasingly across national boundaries to access human tissue repositories. Will discrepancies in national policies on informed consent and IP rights hinder progress?

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Change history

  • 01 July 2005

    Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 539–545 (2005) In Table 1, page 540, the source of funding for the Singapore Tissue Network was given as the “Singapore Biomedical Research Council, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Ministry of Health and the Genome Institute of Singapore.” It should have read the “Singapore's Biomedical Research Council of the Agency for Science Technology and Research.

References

  1. Eiseman, E. & Haga, S.B. Handbook of Human Tissue Sources: A National Resource of Human Tissue Samples (RAND, Santa Monica, CA, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bouchie, A. Coming soon—a global grid for cancer research. Nat. Biotechnol. 22, 1071–1073 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Árnason, V. Coding and consent: moral challenges of the database project in Iceland. Bioethics 18, 27–49 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Godard, B. et al. Strategies for consulting with the community: the cases of four large-scale genetic databases. Science and Engineering Ethics 10, 457–477 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Moore v. Regents of the University of California, 793 P.2d 479 (Cal. 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Greenberg v. Miami Children's Hosp. Research Inst., Inc., 64 F. Supp. 2d 1064 (S.D.Fla. 2003).

  7. Árnason, E. Personal identifiability in the Icelandic Health Sector Database. J. Inform. Law Technol. 2, (2002). http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/elj/jilt/2002_2/arnason/

  8. Kaye, J. et al. Population genetic databases: a comparative analysis of the law in Iceland, Sweden, Estonia, and the UK. Trames 8, 15–13 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bauer, K. et al. Ethical issues in tissue banking for research: a brief review of existing organizational policies. Theor. Med. Bioethics 25, 113–142 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Maschke, K.J. & Murray, T.H. Ethical issues in tissue banking for research: the prospects and pitfalls of setting international standards. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25, 142–155 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Andrews, L. Future Perfect: Confronting Decisions about Genetics (Columbia University Press, NY, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maschke, K. Navigating an ethical patchwork—human gene banks. Nat Biotechnol 23, 539–545 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0505-539

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0505-539

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing