Incentives and strategies of key players in the global food industry may be driving public acceptance of agrobiotechnology as much as consumer attitudes.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Ballenger, N, M. Bohman and M. Gehlhar . Biotechnology: implications for US corn and soybean trade. Agric. Outlook 270, 24–28 (April, 2000).
Kalaitzandonakes, N.G. Agrobiotechnology and Competitiveness. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 82, 1224–1233 (2000).
Fitzell, P. Private Label Marketing in the 1990s (Global Book Production, New York, 1992).
Gaskell, G. et al. Biotechnology and the European public. Nat. Biotechnol. 18, 935–938 (2000).
Kalaitzandonakes N.G. R. Maltsbarger and J. Barnes . The global costs of identity preservation. Can. J. of Agric. Econ. 49, 605–615 (2001).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kalaitzandonakes, N., Bijman, J. Who is driving biotechnology acceptance?. Nat Biotechnol 21, 366–369 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0403-366
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0403-366
This article is cited by
-
Will GM animals follow the GM plant fate?
Transgenic Research (2013)
-
Genetically modified crops for the bioeconomy: meeting public and regulatory expectations
Transgenic Research (2007)
-
Respecting The Autonomy of European and American Consumers: Defending Positive Labels on Gm Foods
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics (2005)
