Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Claim Language in Biotechnology Patents

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it


Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout


  1. Radio Steel and Mfg. v. MTD Products, 221 USPQ 657 (CAFC 1984), quoting from a Supreme Court decision, Graver Tank and Mfg. v. Linde Air Products, 339 US 605, 85 USPQ 328 (1950).

  2. Texas Instruments v. U.S. International Trade Commission, 231 USPQ 833 (CAFC 1986).

  3. 3 USPQ2d 1481 (N.D.Cal. 1987), rehearing at 6 USPQ2d 1018 (N.D. Cal. 1988).

  4. 4.8 USPQ2d 1377 (N.D. Cal., 1988).

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. by Patrick D. Kelly, a patent attorney specializing in biotechnology with Haverstock, Garrett and Roberts, 611 Olive St., St. Louis, MO 63101. He is the author of four books and the inventor of one issued and several pending patents.

    • Patrick D. Kelly

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kelly, P. Claim Language in Biotechnology Patents. Nat Biotechnol 7, 138–140 (1989).

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing