The features of a US post-grant patent opposition system are now being determined.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
See Derzko, N.M. & Behringer, J.W. Nat. Biotechnol. 21, 823–825 (2003).
These reports can by found at http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/strat21/action/sr2.htm (PTO report); http://www.ftc.gov/os/2003/10/innovationrpt.pdf (FTC report) and http://www.nap.edu/html/patentsystem/ (NAS report).
See Cornish, K.V.J. Nat. Biotechnol. 18, 899–890 (2000).
The text of HR 5299 can be found at http://www.townsend.com/files/patentreform.pdf
In statutory terms, the issues of validity that could be considered during an opposition proceeding are the requirements for patentability set forth in 35 USC sections 101, 102, 103, 112 and 251 ¶4 (improperly broadened reissue claims) except 102 (c) (f) or (g) and the best mode requirement of section 112. Issues related to double patenting could also be considered.
A patent interference is an administrative proceeding to determine who is entitled to a patent when multiple parties file patent applications for the same invention.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Author notes
The views expressed in this article are those of the author and not of Townsend and Townsend and Crew LLP or clients of the firm.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Apple, T. The coming US patent opposition. Nat Biotechnol 23, 245–247 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0205-245
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0205-245