Letter | Published:

Photosynthetic artificial organelles sustain and control ATP-dependent reactions in a protocellular system

Nature Biotechnology volume 36, pages 530535 (2018) | Download Citation

Abstract

Inside cells, complex metabolic reactions are distributed across the modular compartments of organelles1,2. Reactions in organelles have been recapitulated in vitro by reconstituting functional protein machineries into membrane systems3,4,5. However, maintaining and controlling these reactions is challenging. Here we designed, built, and tested a switchable, light-harvesting organelle that provides both a sustainable energy source and a means of directing intravesicular reactions. An ATP (ATP) synthase and two photoconverters (plant-derived photosystem II and bacteria-derived proteorhodopsin) enable ATP synthesis. Independent optical activation of the two photoconverters allows dynamic control of ATP synthesis: red light facilitates and green light impedes ATP synthesis. We encapsulated the photosynthetic organelles in a giant vesicle to form a protocellular system and demonstrated optical control of two ATP-dependent reactions, carbon fixation and actin polymerization, with the latter altering outer vesicle morphology. Switchable photosynthetic organelles may enable the development of biomimetic vesicle systems with regulatory networks that exhibit homeostasis and complex cellular behaviors.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    & The second wave of synthetic biology: from modules to systems. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 410–422 (2009).

  2. 2.

    , , & Engineering genetic circuit interactions within and between synthetic minimal cells. Nat. Chem. 9, 431–439 (2017).

  3. 3.

    & Biology under construction: in vitro reconstitution of cellular function. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 644–650 (2009).

  4. 4.

    , & Reconstitution of cytoskeletal protein assemblies for large-scale membrane transformation. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 22, 18–26 (2014).

  5. 5.

    , , & Photosynthetic proteins in supported lipid bilayers: towards a biokleptic approach for energy capture. Small 11, 3306–3318 (2015).

  6. 6.

    , & Sugar synthesis in a protocellular model leads to a cell signalling response in bacteria. Nat. Chem. 1, 377–383 (2009).

  7. 7.

    , & Vesicle-based artificial cells as chemical microreactors with spatially segregated reaction pathways. Nat. Commun. 5, 5305 (2014).

  8. 8.

    , , & Influenza virus M2 protein mediates ESCRT-independent membrane scission. Cell 142, 902–913 (2010).

  9. 9.

    & Lipid rafts as a membrane-organizing principle. Science 327, 46–50 (2010).

  10. 10.

    et al. Topology and dynamics of active nematic vesicles. Science 345, 1135–1139 (2014).

  11. 11.

    et al. Cell-sized liposomes reveal how actomyosin cortical tension drives shape change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 16456–16461 (2013).

  12. 12.

    et al. Membrane-induced bundling of actin filaments. Nat. Phys. 4, 789–793 (2008).

  13. 13.

    & Artificial organelle: ATP synthesis from cellular mimetic polymersomes. Nano Lett. 5, 2538–2542 (2005).

  14. 14.

    , , , & Coassembly of photosystem II and ATPase as artificial chloroplast for light-driven ATP Synthesis. ACS Nano 10, 556–561 (2016).

  15. 15.

    et al. A recursive vesicle-based model protocell with a primitive model cell cycle. Nat. Commun. 6, 8352 (2015).

  16. 16.

    , , & Sustainable proliferation of liposomes compatible with inner RNA replication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 590–595 (2016).

  17. 17.

    , , , & Controlled transcription of exogenous mRNA in platelets using protocells. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 13590–13593 (2015).

  18. 18.

    & A vesicle bioreactor as a step toward an artificial cell assembly. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 17669–17674 (2004).

  19. 19.

    & Engineering bacterial efflux pumps for solar-powered bioremediation of surface waters. Nano Lett. 13, 2189–2193 (2013).

  20. 20.

    & Evolution of photosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 62, 515–548 (2011).

  21. 21.

    , , & Crystal structure of oxygen-evolving photosystem II at a resolution of 1.9 Å. Nature 473, 55–60 (2011).

  22. 22.

    et al. Bacterial rhodopsin: evidence for a new type of phototrophy in the sea. Science 289, 1902–1906 (2000).

  23. 23.

    , , & Proteorhodopsin. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1837, 614–625 (2014).

  24. 24.

    et al. Lipid bilayer composition can influence the orientation of proteorhodopsin in artificial membranes. Biophys. J. 105, 1388–1396 (2013).

  25. 25.

    , , & To flip or not to flip: lipid-protein charge interactions are a determinant of final membrane protein topology. J. Cell Biol. 182, 925–935 (2008).

  26. 26.

    , & The Escherichia coli F1F0 ATP synthase displays biphasic synthesis kinetics. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 4465–4470 (2004).

  27. 27.

    & Cellular motility driven by assembly and disassembly of actin filaments. Cell 112, 453–465 (2003).

  28. 28.

    & Cell mechanics and the cytoskeleton. Nature 463, 485–492 (2010).

  29. 29.

    & Building the cell: design principles of cellular architecture. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 593–602 (2008).

  30. 30.

    Building artificial cells and protocell models: experimental approaches with lipid vesicles. BioEssays 32, 296–303 (2010).

  31. 31.

    , , , & Functional architecture of higher plant photosystem II supercomplexes. EMBO J. 28, 3052–3063 (2009).

  32. 32.

    , , & Fast isolation of highly active photosystem II core complexes from spinach. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 52, 793–800 (2010).

  33. 33.

    , , & Screening and characterization of proteorhodopsin color-tuning mutations in Escherichia coli with endogenous retinal synthesis. Bba-Bioenergetics 1777, 504–513 (2008).

  34. 34.

    et al. Proton transfers in the photochemical reaction cycle of proteorhodopsin. Biochemistry 41, 5348–5358 (2002).

  35. 35.

    & Purification and reconstitution of the F1F0-ATP synthase from alkaliphilic Bacillus firmus OF4. Evidence that the enzyme translocates H+ but not Na+. J. Biol. Chem. 265, 20547–20554 (1990).

  36. 36.

    & Reconstitution of membrane proteins into liposomes. Methods Enzymol. 372, 65–86 (2003).

  37. 37.

    The chequered history of the development and use of simultaneous equations for the accurate determination of chlorophylls a and b. Photosynth. Res. 73, 149–156 (2002).

  38. 38.

    , , , & Proteorhodopsin phototrophy in the ocean. Nature 411, 786–789 (2001).

  39. 39.

    , , & Giant vesicles: preparations and applications. ChemBioChem 11, 848–865 (2010).

  40. 40.

    & Liposome electroformation. Faraday Discuss. Chem. Soc. 81, 303–311 (1986).

  41. 41.

    et al. A new method for the reconstitution of membrane proteins into giant unilamellar vesicles. Biophys. J. 87, 419–429 (2004).

  42. 42.

    , & Reconstitution of proteins on electroformed giant unilamellar vesicles. Methods Cell Biol. 128, 319–338 (2015).

  43. 43.

    et al. Order of lipid phases in model and plasma membranes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 16645–16650 (2009).

  44. 44.

    , , & SNARF-1 as an intracellular pH indicator in laser microspectrofluorometry: a critical assessment. Anal. Biochem. 193, 49–54 (1991).

  45. 45.

    , & Spectroscopic microscopy analysis of the interior pH of individual phospholipid vesicles. Anal. Chem. 83, 8230–8238 (2011).

  46. 46.

    , , , & Rapid screening of membrane protein activity: electrophysiological analysis of OmpF reconstituted in proteoliposomes. Lab Chip 8, 587–595 (2008).

  47. 47.

    , , , & Protein reconstitution into freestanding planar lipid membranes for electrophysiological characterization. Nat. Protoc. 10, 188–198 (2015).

  48. 48.

    , , , & ATP synthesis by the F0F1 ATP synthase from thermophilic Bacillus PS3 reconstituted into liposomes with bacteriorhodopsin. 1. Factors defining the optimal reconstitution of ATP synthases with bacteriorhodopsin. Eur. J. Biochem. 235, 769–778 (1996).

  49. 49.

    & Improved purification for thermophilic F1F0 ATP synthase using n-dodecyl beta-D-maltoside. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 407, 117–124 (2002).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Mid-Career Researcher Programs (2016R1A2B3015239 and 2011-0017539), Foreign Research Institute Recruitment Program (2013K1A4A3055268), 2015R1D1A1A01058917, and DRC-14-03-KRICT through the National Research Foundation, funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT, Korea. K.Y.L. and T.K.A. acknowledge the support provided by the Woo Jang Chun Special Project of the Rural Development Administration, Korea (PJ009106022013).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Institute of Biological Interfaces and Department of Chemistry, Sogang University, Seoul, Korea.

    • Keel Yong Lee
    • , Heeyeon Kim
    •  & Kwanwoo Shin
  2. Disease Biophysics Group, Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

    • Keel Yong Lee
    • , Sung-Jin Park
    •  & Kevin Kit Parker
  3. Department of Energy Science, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Korea.

    • Keel Yong Lee
    •  & Tae Kyu Ahn
  4. Sogang-Harvard Research Center for Disease Biophysics, Sogang University, Seoul, Korea.

    • Keel Yong Lee
    • , Sung-Jin Park
    • , Kevin Kit Parker
    •  & Kwanwoo Shin
  5. Department of Life Science and Institute of Biological Interfaces, Sogang University, Seoul, Korea.

    • Keon Ah Lee
    • , Se-Hwan Kim
    •  & Kwang-Hwan Jung
  6. John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

    • Yasmine Meroz
    •  & L Mahadevan
  7. Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Department of Physics, Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Kavli Institute for Nanobio Science and Technology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

    • L Mahadevan

Authors

  1. Search for Keel Yong Lee in:

  2. Search for Sung-Jin Park in:

  3. Search for Keon Ah Lee in:

  4. Search for Se-Hwan Kim in:

  5. Search for Heeyeon Kim in:

  6. Search for Yasmine Meroz in:

  7. Search for L Mahadevan in:

  8. Search for Kwang-Hwan Jung in:

  9. Search for Tae Kyu Ahn in:

  10. Search for Kevin Kit Parker in:

  11. Search for Kwanwoo Shin in:

Contributions

K.Y.L., S.-J.P., K.-H.J., T.K.A., K.K.P., and K.S. developed the concept and supervised experiments. K.Y.L., K.A.L., and S.-H.K. carried out purification of photoconverters and ATP synthase. K.Y.L. and H.K. calibrated intravesicular pH. K.Y.L. and S.-J.P. performed photocurrent measurements. K.Y.L., S.-J.P., and K.S. designed the photosynthetic protocellular system with artificial organelles and performed reconstitution experiments. Y.M., K.Y.L., S.-J.P., and L.M. worked out the theoretical description. All authors discussed the results and contributed to the writing of the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Kwang-Hwan Jung or Tae Kyu Ahn or Kevin Kit Parker or Kwanwoo Shin.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Text and Figures

    Supplementary Figures 1–24

  2. 2.

    Life Sciences Reporting Summary

  3. 3.

    Supplementary Notes

    Supplementary Notes 1–2

Videos

  1. 1.

    Regulation of intravesicular pH of a PSII-PR co-reconstituted proteoliposome by selectively activating PSII with red light and PR with green light.

    Time-lapse video of a PSII-PR co-reconstituted proteoliposome stimulated by alternating white (400–700 nm), red (660 ± 52 nm), and green (540 ± 27 nm) light. The intravesicular pH rapidly decreased from an initial pH of 8.2 with the activation of both PSII and PR with white light (0–28 min) and decreased further with the activation of PSII with red light (28–36 and 44–50 min) but increased with the activation of PR with green light (36–44 and 50–60 min). The intravesicular pH of the proteoliposome was measured using a ratiometric pH SNARF-1 indicator. Scale bar = 10 μm.

  2. 2.

    Three-dimensional reconstruction of microscopic images of actin filaments in a protocellular system.

    The actins (white lines) encapsulated inside a protocellular system were polymerized when they were coupled via ATP synthesis of the artificial organelles (green dots) inside the membrane system (membrane: red outer boundary).

  3. 3.

    Actin polymerization in the protocellular system during white light illumination.

    Time-lapse video of a protocellular system (red) containing photosynthetic organelles (green) and G-actin showing polymerization of actin filaments (white). Optical stimulation initiated G-actin nucleation (~15 min) and F-actin elongation (~60 min), leading to formation of a single F-actin sphere (~135 min). The F-actin sphere grew until the membrane ruptured (275 min). Scale bar = 10 μm.

  4. 4.

    Regulation of actin polymerization in a protocellular system via the organelle-based optical regulatory mechanism.

    ATP-dependent actin (white lines) polymerization in a protocellular system (membrane: red outer boundary) was coupled with the ATP regulatory mechanism of the artificial organelles (green dots). The projection area of a F-actin sphere increased when ATP synthesis was facilitated via PSII activation with red light (120–180 and 240–300 min), but the F-actin area remained the same or decreased when ATP synthesis was impeded via PR activation with green light (180–240 min). Scale bar = 10 μm.

  5. 5.

    Regulation of actin polymerization in a protocellular system via the light-on and light-off protocols.

    ATP-dependent actin (white lines) polymerization in a protocellular system (membrane: red outer boundary) was coupled with the ATP regulatory mechanism of the artificial organelles (green dots). The projection area of a F-actin sphere increased in the light-on condition (white light, 120–180 min), and the F-actin area continuously increased even after the start of the light-off condition (180–200 min). The quenching rate of actin polymerization in the light-off case was slower than that of the green-light case. Scale bar = 10 μm.

  6. 6.

    Failure of actin polymerization in a protocellular system in the absence of light stimulation (negative control).

    Time-lapse video of a protocellular system (red) containing photosynthetic organelles (green) and G-actins. Polymerization of actin filaments (white) was not initiated without light illumination, indicating that actin polymerization is completely dependent on ATP synthesized by the organelles. Scale bar = 10 μm

  7. 7.

    Failure of actin polymerization in a protocellular system in the absence of artificial organelles (negative control).

    Time-lapse video of a protocellular system (red) containing G-actins. Polymerization of actin filaments (white) was not initiated without the photosynthetic artificial organelles, indicating that actin polymerization is completely dependent on ATP synthesized by the organelles. Scale bar = 10 μm.

  8. 8.

    Failure of actin polymerization inside a protocellular system whose membrane lacked magnesium ionophores.

    Time-lapse video of a protocellular system (red) containing photosynthetic organelles (green) and G-actins. Upon illumination, F-actins (white) were polymerized outside the protocellular system. In contrast, actin polymerization inside the protocellular system was not initiated in the absence of magnesium ionophores because magnesium ions were not being transported into the protocellular system. When the membrane ruptured, F-actins inside the cell suddenly polymerized because diffusion of magnesium ions outside the membrane allowed polymerization to occur. Scale bar = 10 μm.

  9. 9.

    Initiation of actin polymerization in a protocellular system by magnesium influx.

    Time-lapse video of a protocellular system (red) containing ATP molecules, G-actin, and membrane-bound magnesium ionophores. Actin polymerization occurred when magnesium ions were added outside the protocellular system, showing that magnesium influx through the ionophores initiates actin polymerization. Scale bar = 10 μm.

  10. 10.

    Strong repulsive membrane–actin interaction in a single phase protocellular system made of Lo2 phase membrane mixture.

    Time-lapse video of a protocellular system containing photosynthetic organelles (green). The membrane system (red), made of the Lo2 phase mixture (sphingomyelin, polysaturated PEG-2000-PE, and cholesterol), induced a strong repulsive interaction between the membrane and actin filaments (white), resulting in a spherical membrane shape and a gap between the membrane and actin filaments. Scale bar = 10 μm.

  11. 11.

    Weak attractive membrane–actin interaction in a single phase protocellular system cell made of Lo1 phase membrane mixture.

    Time-lapse video of a protocellular system containing photosynthetic organelles (green). The membrane system (red), made of the Lo1 phase mixture (sphingomyelin and cholesterol), induced a weak attractive interaction between the outer membrane and actin filaments (white), resulting in attachment of actin filaments to the membrane. Notably, the membrane fragments remained attached to the F-actin sphere even after the membrane ruptured. Scale bar = 10 μm

  12. 12.

    Strong attractive membrane-actin interaction in a single phase protocellular system of Ld phase membrane mixture.

    Time-lapse video of a protocellular system containing photosynthetic organelles (green). The membrane system (red), made of the Ld phase mixture (polyunsaturated phospholipids), induced a strong attractive interaction between the membrane and actin filaments (white), resulting in attachment of actin filaments to the membrane and local membrane deformation (wrinkled shape). Scale bar = 10 μm.

  13. 13.

    Shape change in a phase-separated protocellular system made of Ld-Lo2 phase mixtures by membrane–actin interactions.

    Time-lapse video of a protocellular system containing photosynthetic organelles (green). The membrane system (red) was made of two different phase membrane mixtures (Ld and Lo2) using the phase-separation method. Polymerized actins (white) were strongly attached to the Ld phase membrane owing to the strong interaction between actin and the Ld phase membrane, but they did not attach to the Lo2 phase membrane owing to the repulsive interaction between actin and the Lo2 phase membrane. The difference between local filament–membrane interactions induced a change in the global protocellular system's curvature, deforming the spherical cell into an asymmetrical dumbbell shape as actin polymerization proceeded. Scale bar = 10 μm.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4140