Correspondence

Removing Bt eggplant from the face of Indian regulators

  • Subscribe to Nature Biotechnology for full access:

    $250

    Subscribe

Additional access options:

Already a subscriber?  Log in  now or  Register  for online access.

References

  1. 1.

    Ministry of Environment and Forests. Decision on commercialisation of Bt brinjal. (Government of India, 2010).

  2. 2.

    Ministry of Environment and Forests. Citizen's/client's charter for 2011–2012 (Government of India, 2011)

  3. 3.

    Genetic Engineering Approval Committee. Report of the expert committee on Bt brinjal and consideration of the proposal for environmental release of Bt brinjal event EE-I developed by M/s Mahyco, TNAU Coimbatore and UAS Dharwad, Agenda Item No. 4.1. Decisions taken in the 97th Meeting of the Genetic Engineering Approval Committee (GEAC) held on 14.10.2009. (MOEF, Government of India, 2009).

  4. 4.

    Science 327, 767 (2010).

  5. 5.

    Ministry of Environment and Forests. Notification S.O. 1533. (Government of India, 2006).

  6. 6.

    Don't hasten introduction of Bt brinjal: M.S. Swaminathan, The Hindu (1 February, 2010).

  7. 7.

    & The development and regulation of Bt brinjal in India. ISAAA Brief No. 38 (International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications, 2009).

  8. 8.

    Nature 521, 138–139 (2015).

  9. 9.

    The global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2013. ISAAA Brief No. 46 (International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications, 2013).

  10. 10.

    & Seeds of Suicide: The Ecological and Human Costs of Seed Monopolies and Globalisation of Agriculture. (Navdanya, 2006).

  11. 11.

    , , , & Plant Biotechnol. J. 12, 135–146 (2014).

  12. 12.

    Anonymous. Chaos, deep divisions at consultation on Bt brinjal. The Hindu (6 February 2010).

  13. 13.

    Curr. Sci. 98, 996–997 (2010).

  14. 14.

    et al. Food Chem. Toxicol. 50, 4221–4423 (2012).

  15. 15.

    Indian Academy of Sciences et al. Inter-academy report on GM crops (updated) (2010).

  16. 16.

    Indian academies' GM crop report slammed. Nature News Blog (28 September 2010).

  17. 17.

    Anonymous. From approval to appraisal. Business Standard (11 August (2010).

  18. 18.

    Over 100 GM crop trials pending as nodal body fails to meet. The Hindu Business Line (6 June 2013).

  19. 19.

    Science 337, 789 (2012).

  20. 20.

    The Supreme Court of India. Order, Writ Petition (C ivil) No. 260/2005 (10 May 2012).

  21. 21.

    Press Information Bureau, Government of India. Meeting of Scientific Advisory Council of PM on biotechnology and agriculture. (9 October 2012).

  22. 22.

    Anonymous. Foreign-aided NGOs are actively stalling development, IB tells PMO in a report. Indian Express (7 June 2014).

  23. 23.

    et al. Science 341, 1320 (2013).

  24. 24.

    , , & Nat. Biotechnol. 21, 1003–1009 (2003).

  25. 25.

    Government of India. The Biotechnology Regulatory Authority of India Bill (2013).

Download references

Acknowledgements

P.K.G. recognizes the award of INSA Senior Scientist, India. B.C. and G.G. acknowledge support of Marc Van Montagu, IPBO, Ghent University, Belgium.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Chaudhary Charan Singh University, Meerut, India.

    • Pushpendra Kumar Gupta
  2. Department of Molecular Biotechnology, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.

    • Bhagirath Choudhary
    •  & Godelieve Gheysen
  3. Institute of Plant Biotechnology Outreach, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.

    • Bhagirath Choudhary
    •  & Godelieve Gheysen

Authors

  1. Search for Pushpendra Kumar Gupta in:

  2. Search for Bhagirath Choudhary in:

  3. Search for Godelieve Gheysen in:

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bhagirath Choudhary.