Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Removing Bt eggplant from the face of Indian regulators


This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. Ministry of Environment and Forests. Decision on commercialisation of Bt brinjal. (Government of India, 2010).

  2. Ministry of Environment and Forests. Citizen's/client's charter for 2011–2012 (Government of India, 2011)

  3. Genetic Engineering Approval Committee. Report of the expert committee on Bt brinjal and consideration of the proposal for environmental release of Bt brinjal event EE-I developed by M/s Mahyco, TNAU Coimbatore and UAS Dharwad, Agenda Item No. 4.1. Decisions taken in the 97th Meeting of the Genetic Engineering Approval Committee (GEAC) held on 14.10.2009. (MOEF, Government of India, 2009).

  4. Bagla, P. Science 327, 767 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ministry of Environment and Forests. Notification S.O. 1533. (Government of India, 2006).

  6. Barik, S. Don't hasten introduction of Bt brinjal: M.S. Swaminathan, The Hindu (1 February, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Choudhary, B. & Gaur, K. The development and regulation of Bt brinjal in India. ISAAA Brief No. 38 (International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications, 2009).

  8. Kumar, S. Nature 521, 138–139 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. James, C. The global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2013. ISAAA Brief No. 46 (International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications, 2013).

  10. Shiva, V. & Jalees, K. Seeds of Suicide: The Ecological and Human Costs of Seed Monopolies and Globalisation of Agriculture. (Navdanya, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Choudhary, B., Gheysen, G., Buysse, J., van der Meer, P. & Burssens, S. Plant Biotechnol. J. 12, 135–146 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Anonymous. Chaos, deep divisions at consultation on Bt brinjal. The Hindu (6 February 2010).

  13. Shantharam, S. Curr. Sci. 98, 996–997 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Séralini, G.-É. et al. Food Chem. Toxicol. 50, 4221–4423 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Indian Academy of Sciences et al. Inter-academy report on GM crops (updated) (2010).

  16. Shetty, P. Indian academies' GM crop report slammed. Nature News Blog (28 September 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Anonymous. From approval to appraisal. Business Standard (11 August (2010).

  18. Kurmanath, K.V. Over 100 GM crop trials pending as nodal body fails to meet. The Hindu Business Line (6 June 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bagla, P. Science 337, 789 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. The Supreme Court of India. Order, Writ Petition (C ivil) No. 260/2005 (10 May 2012).

  21. Press Information Bureau, Government of India. Meeting of Scientific Advisory Council of PM on biotechnology and agriculture. (9 October 2012).

  22. Anonymous. Foreign-aided NGOs are actively stalling development, IB tells PMO in a report. Indian Express (7 June 2014).

  23. Alberts, B. et al. Science 341, 1320 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mendelsohn, M., Kough, J., Vaituzis, Z. & Matthews, K. Nat. Biotechnol. 21, 1003–1009 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Government of India. The Biotechnology Regulatory Authority of India Bill (2013).

Download references


P.K.G. recognizes the award of INSA Senior Scientist, India. B.C. and G.G. acknowledge support of Marc Van Montagu, IPBO, Ghent University, Belgium.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bhagirath Choudhary.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gupta, P., Choudhary, B. & Gheysen, G. Removing Bt eggplant from the face of Indian regulators. Nat Biotechnol 33, 904–907 (2015).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing