This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Are ladybird beetles (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) affected by Bt proteins expressed in genetically modified insect-resistant crops? A systematic review protocol
Environmental Evidence Open Access 13 June 2019
-
Bt cotton producing Cry1Ac and Cry2Ab does not harm two parasitoids, Cotesia marginiventris and Copidosoma floridanum
Scientific Reports Open Access 10 January 2018
-
Genetically modified crops in Switzerland: implications for agrosystem sustainability evidenced by multi-criteria model
Agronomy for Sustainable Development Open Access 02 May 2016
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
European Food Safety Authority. EFSA J. 1149, 1–85 (2009). <http://www.efsa.europa.eu/de/scdocs/doc/1149.pdf/>
Romeis, J. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 203–208 (2008).
Sanvido, O. et al. Environ. Sci. Policy 15, 82–91 (2012).
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Consensus document on safety information on transgenic plants expressing Bacillus thuringiensis - derived insect control protein. Series on Harmonisation of Regulatory Oversight in Biotechnology, No. 42 <http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/36/61/46815888.pdf/> (2007).
Romeis, J., Meissle, M. & Bigler, F. Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 63–71 (2006).
Marvier, M. et al. Science 316, 1475–1477 (2007).
Wolfenbarger, L.L. et al. PLoS ONE 3, e2118 (2008).
Naranjo, S.E. CAB Rev. Perspect. Agric. Vet. Sci. Nutr. Nat. Resour. 4, No. 011 (2009).
Romeis, J. et al. Transgenic Res. 20, 1–22 (2011).
Bøhn, T. et al. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 55, 584–592 (2008).
Rosi-Marshall, E.J. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 16204–16208 (2007).
Schmidt, J.E.U. et al. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 56, 221–228 (2009).
Hilbeck, A. et al. Environ. Entomol. 27, 1255–1263 (1998).
European Commission. Rules on GMOs in the EU—Ban on GMOs cultivation. <http://ec.europa.eu/food/food/biotechnology/gmo_ban_cultivation_en.htm/>
Anonymous. Germany: Minister Aigner bans MON810 Bt maize. GMO Compass <http://www.gmo-compass.org/eng/news/432.germany_aigner_bans_mon810_bt_maize.html/> (14 April 2009)
Jaffe, G. Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 748–749 (2006).
Shelton, A.M. & Sears, M.K. Plant J. 27, 483–488 (2001).
OGTR. Risk Analysis Framework <http://www.ogtr.gov.au/internet/ogtr/publishing.nsf/Content/raf-3/$FILE/raffinal4.pdf/> (Australian Government, Office of the Gene Technology Regulator, 2009).
Séralini, G.-E. et al. Food Chem. Toxicol. 50, 4221–4231 (2012).
European Food Safety Authority. EFSA J. 10, 2986 (2012).
Food Standards Australia New Zealand. Response to Séralini paper on the long term toxicity of Roundup herbicide and a Roundup-tolerant genetically modified maize. <http://www.foodstandards.gov.au/consumerinformation/gmfoods/gmfactsheetsandpublications/responsetosralinipap5676.cfm/> (2012).
Health Canada. Health Canada and Canadian Food Inspection Agency statement on the Séralini et al. (2012) publication on a 2-year rodent feeding study with glyphosate formulations and GM maize NK603. <http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/fn-an/gmf-agm/seralini-eng.php/> (2012).
Butler, D. Nature 490, 158 (2012).
Houllier, F. Nature 491, 327 (2012).
Acknowledgements
We thank S.E. Naranjo and R.L. Hellmich (USDA-ARS) for the many constructive discussions that helped to develop this paper and for critical comments on earlier drafts of the manuscript. Furthermore, we would like to acknowledge helpful comments provided by the following readers: F. Bigler and M. Meissle (Agroscope ART) and Y. Devos (European Food Safety Authority).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Text and Figures
Supplementary Notes (PDF 175 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Romeis, J., McLean, M. & Shelton, A. When bad science makes good headlines: Bt maize and regulatory bans. Nat Biotechnol 31, 386–387 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2578
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2578
This article is cited by
-
Are ladybird beetles (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) affected by Bt proteins expressed in genetically modified insect-resistant crops? A systematic review protocol
Environmental Evidence (2019)
-
Bt cotton producing Cry1Ac and Cry2Ab does not harm two parasitoids, Cotesia marginiventris and Copidosoma floridanum
Scientific Reports (2018)
-
Consumer acceptance of food crops developed by genome editing
Plant Cell Reports (2016)
-
The interaction of two-spotted spider mites, Tetranychus urticae Koch, with Cry protein production and predation by Amblyseius andersoni (Chant) in Cry1Ac/Cry2Ab cotton and Cry1F maize
Transgenic Research (2016)
-
Genetically modified crops in Switzerland: implications for agrosystem sustainability evidenced by multi-criteria model
Agronomy for Sustainable Development (2016)