Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advances in DNA sequencing lead to patent disputes

Will next-generation DNA sequencing technologies be hindered or helped by today's more aggressive patent acquisition and enforcement practices?

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. Rusert, B.M. Patented DNA Sequencing Methods 4 (19 July 2005) http://www.genome.duke.edu/search/?cx=018110843849616161307%3Ac7fkkfpm0uy&cof=FORID%3A11%3BNB%3A1&q=Britt+M.+Rusert+Patent+DNA+Sequencing+Methods&sa.x=0&sa.y=0

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cook-Deegan, R. & Heaney, C. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 11, 383–425 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Inc. v. The Perkin-Elmer Corp., No. 97-04203, 2000 WL 1897300 (N.D. Cal. December 22, 2000).

  4. Anonymous. The Paul Grossman Story, Part II. (Life Sciences Foundation, 2012) http://www.lifesciencesfoundation.org/stories-The_Paul_Grossman_Story_Part_II.html

  5. California Institute of Technology v. Enzo Life Sciences, Inc., Patent Interference No. 105,496 (B.P.A.I. Sept. 22, 2010).

  6. The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act of 2011, Pub. L. No. 112–29, 125 Stat. 284 (2011).

  7. Enzo Biochem, Inc. v. Applera Corp., 599 F.3d 1325 (Fed. Cir. 2010).

  8. 31 U.S.C.A. § 3730 (West 2010).

  9. United States v. Applera Corp., 155 F. App'x 291 (9th Cir. 2005).

  10. Huang v. California Institute of Technology et al. No.11-00703, 2004 WL 2296330 (C.D. Cal. Feb. 18, 2004).

  11. Mardis, E. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 9, 387–402 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Applera Corp.-Applied Biosystems Group v. Illumina, Inc., 375 F. App'x 12 (Fed. Cir. 2010).

  13. Life Technologies Corp. v. Illumina, Inc., Fed. Cir. 3:11-cv-00703-CAB-DHB, 2012 WL 4003429 (S.D. Cal. 2012).

  14. Helicos Biosciences Corp. v. Illuminia, Inc., et al., No. 10-735, 2012 WL 1556390 (D. Del. May 3, 2012).

  15. Helicos Biosciences Corp. v. Illuminia, Inc., et al., No. 10-735 (D. Del., August 28, 2012 memorandum) (August 28, 2012 memorandum).

  16. Esoterix Genetic Laboratories, LLC v. Life Technologies Corp, et al., No. 12-00 411 (Mid. D. N.C. April 26, 2012).

  17. Illumina, Inc., et al. v. Complete Genomics, Inc., No. 10-649 (D. Del. November 9, 2010).

  18. Illumina, Inc., et al. v. Complete Genomics, Inc., et al., No. 12-01465 (S.D. Cal. 2012) (filed June 15, 2012).

  19. Life Technologies Corp., et al v. Illumina, Inc., et al., No. 11-00703 (S.D. Cal. May 7, 2010).

  20. Helicos Biosciences Corp. v. Illumina, Inc. No. 10-00735 (D. Delaware, 2010)

  21. Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York v. Illumina, Inc., No. 12-00376 (D. Del. 2012).

  22. Helicos Biosciences Corp. v. Illumina, Inc. No. 10-00735 (D. Delaware, 2010).

  23. Hardin v. Williams, Patent Interference Number 105677 (B.P.A.I. Jan. 1, 2011).

  24. Life Technologies Corp. v. Pacific Biosciences of Cal., Inc., No. 11-1582 (N.D. Cal. March 31, 2011).

  25. Illumina, Inc. v. Life Technologies Corp., No. 11-03022 (S.D. Cal. December 27, 2011).

  26. Esoterix Genetics Laboratories, Inc. v. Life Technologies, Inc., et al., No. 12-00411 (Mid. D. N.C. April 26, 2012).

  27. Genetic Technologies Ltd. v. 454 Life Sciences Corp., No. 12-00461 (D. Conn. May 14, 2012).

  28. Nejentsev, S. et al. Science 324, 387–389 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Nottenburg, C. & Sharples, J. Analysis of “Junk DNA” Patents: “Intron Sequence Analysis Method for Detection of Adjacent and Remote Locus Alleles as Haplotypes” (Cambia, 2004) http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/patentscope/en/programs/patent_landscapes/documents/patentlens_techlandscape_junkdna.pdf

  30. Holman, C.M. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 240–244 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher M Holman.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Holman, C. Advances in DNA sequencing lead to patent disputes. Nat Biotechnol 30, 1054–1058 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2407

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2407

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing