Will next-generation DNA sequencing technologies be hindered or helped by today's more aggressive patent acquisition and enforcement practices?
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $8.25 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Rusert, B.M. Patented DNA Sequencing Methods 4 (19 July 2005) http://www.genome.duke.edu/search/?cx=018110843849616161307%3Ac7fkkfpm0uy&cof=FORID%3A11%3BNB%3A1&q=Britt+M.+Rusert+Patent+DNA+Sequencing+Methods&sa.x=0&sa.y=0
Cook-Deegan, R. & Heaney, C. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 11, 383–425 (2010).
Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Inc. v. The Perkin-Elmer Corp., No. 97-04203, 2000 WL 1897300 (N.D. Cal. December 22, 2000).
Anonymous. The Paul Grossman Story, Part II. (Life Sciences Foundation, 2012) http://www.lifesciencesfoundation.org/stories-The_Paul_Grossman_Story_Part_II.html
California Institute of Technology v. Enzo Life Sciences, Inc., Patent Interference No. 105,496 (B.P.A.I. Sept. 22, 2010).
The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act of 2011, Pub. L. No. 112–29, 125 Stat. 284 (2011).
Enzo Biochem, Inc. v. Applera Corp., 599 F.3d 1325 (Fed. Cir. 2010).
31 U.S.C.A. § 3730 (West 2010).
United States v. Applera Corp., 155 F. App'x 291 (9th Cir. 2005).
Huang v. California Institute of Technology et al. No.11-00703, 2004 WL 2296330 (C.D. Cal. Feb. 18, 2004).
Mardis, E. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 9, 387–402 (2008).
Applera Corp.-Applied Biosystems Group v. Illumina, Inc., 375 F. App'x 12 (Fed. Cir. 2010).
Life Technologies Corp. v. Illumina, Inc., Fed. Cir. 3:11-cv-00703-CAB-DHB, 2012 WL 4003429 (S.D. Cal. 2012).
Helicos Biosciences Corp. v. Illuminia, Inc., et al., No. 10-735, 2012 WL 1556390 (D. Del. May 3, 2012).
Helicos Biosciences Corp. v. Illuminia, Inc., et al., No. 10-735 (D. Del., August 28, 2012 memorandum) (August 28, 2012 memorandum).
Esoterix Genetic Laboratories, LLC v. Life Technologies Corp, et al., No. 12-00 411 (Mid. D. N.C. April 26, 2012).
Illumina, Inc., et al. v. Complete Genomics, Inc., No. 10-649 (D. Del. November 9, 2010).
Illumina, Inc., et al. v. Complete Genomics, Inc., et al., No. 12-01465 (S.D. Cal. 2012) (filed June 15, 2012).
Life Technologies Corp., et al v. Illumina, Inc., et al., No. 11-00703 (S.D. Cal. May 7, 2010).
Helicos Biosciences Corp. v. Illumina, Inc. No. 10-00735 (D. Delaware, 2010)
Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York v. Illumina, Inc., No. 12-00376 (D. Del. 2012).
Helicos Biosciences Corp. v. Illumina, Inc. No. 10-00735 (D. Delaware, 2010).
Hardin v. Williams, Patent Interference Number 105677 (B.P.A.I. Jan. 1, 2011).
Life Technologies Corp. v. Pacific Biosciences of Cal., Inc., No. 11-1582 (N.D. Cal. March 31, 2011).
Illumina, Inc. v. Life Technologies Corp., No. 11-03022 (S.D. Cal. December 27, 2011).
Esoterix Genetics Laboratories, Inc. v. Life Technologies, Inc., et al., No. 12-00411 (Mid. D. N.C. April 26, 2012).
Genetic Technologies Ltd. v. 454 Life Sciences Corp., No. 12-00461 (D. Conn. May 14, 2012).
Nejentsev, S. et al. Science 324, 387–389 (2009).
Nottenburg, C. & Sharples, J. Analysis of “Junk DNA” Patents: “Intron Sequence Analysis Method for Detection of Adjacent and Remote Locus Alleles as Haplotypes” (Cambia, 2004) http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/patentscope/en/programs/patent_landscapes/documents/patentlens_techlandscape_junkdna.pdf
Holman, C.M. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 240–244 (2012).
The author declares no competing financial interests.
About this article
Cite this article
Holman, C. Advances in DNA sequencing lead to patent disputes. Nat Biotechnol 30, 1054–1058 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2407
This article is cited by
Nature Biotechnology (2015)