A mildly relativistic wide-angle outflow in the neutron-star merger event GW170817


GW170817 was the first gravitational-wave detection of a binary neutron-star merger1. It was accompanied by radiation across the electromagnetic spectrum and localized2 to the galaxy NGC 4993 at a distance of 40 megaparsecs. It has been proposed that the observed γ-ray, X-ray and radio emission is due to an ultra-relativistic jet being launched during the merger (and successfully breaking out of the surrounding material), directed away from our line of sight (off-axis)3,4,5,6. The presence of such a jet is predicted from models that posit neutron-star mergers as the drivers of short hard-γ-ray bursts7,8. Here we report that the radio light curve of GW170817 has no direct signature of the afterglow of an off-axis jet. Although we cannot completely rule out the existence of a jet directed away from the line of sight, the observed γ-ray emission could not have originated from such a jet. Instead, the radio data require the existence of a mildly relativistic wide-angle outflow moving towards us. This outflow could be the high-velocity tail of the neutron-rich material that was ejected dynamically during the merger, or a cocoon of material that breaks out when a jet launched during the merger transfers its energy to the dynamical ejecta. Because the cocoon model explains the radio light curve of GW170817, as well as the γ-ray and X-ray emission (and possibly also the ultraviolet and optical emission)9,10,11,12,13,14,15, it is the model that is most consistent with the observational data. Cocoons may be a ubiquitous phenomenon produced in neutron-star mergers, giving rise to a hitherto unidentified population of radio, ultraviolet, X-ray and γ-ray transients in the local Universe.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: The radio light curve of GW170817.
Figure 2: Schematic of the various possible jet and dynamical ejecta scenarios in GW170817.
Figure 3: Off-axis jet models.
Figure 4: Quasi-spherical ejecta models.


  1. 1

    Abbott, B. P. et al. GW170817: observation of gravitational waves from a binary neutron star inspiral. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 161101 (2017)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Abbott, B. P. et al. Multi-messenger observations of a binary neutron star merger. Astrophys. J. 848, L12 (2017)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Alexander, K. D. et al. The electromagnetic counterpart of the binary neutron star merger LIGO/Virgo GW170817. VI. Radio constraints on a relativistic jet and predictions for late-time emission from the kilonova ejecta. Astrophys. J. 848, L21 (2017)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Margutti, R. et al. The electromagnetic counterpart of the binary neutron star merger LIGO/Virgo GW170817. V. Rising X-ray emission from an off-axis jet. Astrophys. J. 848, L20 (2017)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Troja, E. et al. The X-ray counterpart to the gravitational-wave event GW170817. Nature 551, 71–74 (2017)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Haggard, D. et al. A deep Chandra X-ray study of neutron star coalescence GW170817. Astrophys. J. 848, L25 (2017)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Eichler, D., Livio, M., Piran, T. & Schramm, D. N. Nucleosynthesis, neutrino bursts and γ-rays from coalescing neutron stars. Nature 340, 126–128 (1989)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Nakar, E. Short-hard gamma-ray bursts. Phys. Rep. 442, 166–236 (2007)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Gottlieb, O., Nakar, E. & Piran, T. The cocoon emission – an electromagnetic counterpart to gravitational waves from neutron star mergers. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 473, 576–584 (2018)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Lazzati, D., Deich, A., Morsony, B. J. & Workman, J. C. Off-axis emission of short γ-ray bursts and the detectability of electromagnetic counterparts of gravitational-wave-detected binary mergers. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 471, 1652–1661 (2017)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Kasliwal, M. M. et al. Illuminating gravitational waves: a concordant picture of photons from a neutron star merger. Science 358, 1559–1565 (2017)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Hallinan, G. et al. A radio counterpart to a neutron star merger. Science 358, 1579–1583 (2017)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Evans, P. A. et al. Swift and NuSTAR observations of GW170817: detection of a blue kilonova. Science 358, 1565–1570 (2017)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Gottlieb, O ., Nakar, E ., Piran, T. & Hotokezaka, K. A cocoon shock breakout as the origin of the gamma-ray emission in GW170817. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.05896 (2017)

  15. 15

    Piro, A. L. & Kollmeier, J. A. Evidence for cocoon emission from the early light curve of SSS17a. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.05822 (2017)

  16. 16

    Fong, W., Berger, E., Margutti, R. & Zauderer, B. A. A decade of short-duration gamma-ray burst broadband afterglows: energetics, circumburst densities, and jet opening angles. Astrophys. J. 815, 102 (2015)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Abbott, B. P. et al. Gravitational waves and gamma-rays from a binary neutron star merger: GW170817 and GRB 170817A. Astrophys. J. 848, L13 (2017)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Granot, J., Panaitescu, A., Kumar, P. & Woosley, S. E. Off-axis afterglow emission from jetted gamma-ray bursts. Astrophys. J. 570, L61–L64 (2002)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Nakar, E., Piran, T. & Granot, J. The detectability of orphan afterglows. Astrophys. J. 579, 699–705 (2002)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Bauswein, A., Goriely, S. & Janka, H.-T. Systematics of dynamical mass ejection, nucleosynthesis, and radioactively powered electromagnetic signals from neutron-star mergers. Astrophys. J. 773, 78 (2013)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Hotokezaka, K. et al. Mass ejection from the merger of binary neutron stars. Phys. Rev. D 87, 024001 (2013)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Kyutoku, K., Ioka, K. & Shibata, M. Ultrarelativistic electromagnetic counterpart to binary neutron star mergers. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 437, L6–L10 (2014)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Nissanke, S., Kasliwal, M. & Georgieva, A. Identifying elusive electromagnetic counterparts to gravitational wave mergers: an end-to-end simulation. Astrophys. J. 767, 124 (2013)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Moharana, R. & Piran, T. Observational evidence for mass ejection accompanying short gamma-ray bursts. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 472, L55–L59 (2017)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    McMullin, J. P ., Waters, B ., Schiebel, D ., Young, W. & Golap, K. CASA architecture and applications. ASP Conf. Ser. 376, 127–130 (2007)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Högbom, J. A. Aperture synthesis with a non-regular distribution of interferometer baselines. Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. 15, 417–426 (1974)

  27. 27

    Adams, S. M., Kasliwal, M. M. & Blagorodnova, N. LIGO/VIRGO G298048: precise position of SSS17a based on HST and Gaia. GCN Circ. 21816 (2017)

  28. 28

    Sault, R. J ., Teuben, P. J. & Wright, M. C. H. A retrospective view of MIRIAD. ASP Conf. Ser. 77, 433–436 (1995)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Shepherd, M. C. Difmap: an interactive program for synthesis imaging. ASP Conf. Ser. 125, 77–84 (1997)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Reddy, S. H. et al. A wideband digital back-end for the upgraded GMRT. J. Astron. Instrum. 6, 1641011 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Soderberg, A. M., Nakar, E., Berger, E. & Kulkarni, S. R. Late-time radio observations of 68 type Ibc supernovae: strong constraints on off-axis gamma-ray bursts. Astrophys. J. 638, 930–937 (2006)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Hotokezaka, K. & Piran, T. Mass ejection from neutron star mergers: different components and expected radio signals. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 450, 1430–1440 (2015)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    van Eerten, H. J. & MacFadyen, A. I. Observational implications of gamma-ray burst afterglow jet simulations and numerical light curve calculations. Astrophys. J. 751, 155 (2012)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Sari, R., Piran, T. & Narayan, R. Spectra and light curves of gamma-ray burst afterglows. Astrophys. J. 497, L17–L20 (1998)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Villar, V. A. et al. The combined ultraviolet, optical, and near-infrared light curves of the kilonova associated with the binary neutron star merger GW170817: homogenized data set, analytic models, and physical implications. Astrophys. J. 851, L21 (2017)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Nakar, E. & Piran, T. The observable signatures of GRB cocoons. Astrophys. J. 834, 28 (2016)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Lazzati, D. et al. Off-axis prompt X-ray transients from the cocoon of short gamma-ray bursts. Astrophys. J. 848, L6 (2017)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Cooke, R. J., Pettini, M., Nollett, K. M. & Jorgenson, R. The primordial deuterium abundance of the most metal-poor damped Lyman-α system. Astrophys. J. 830, 148 (2016)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Aver, E., Olive, K. A., Porter, R. L. & Skillman, E. D. The primordial helium abundance from updated emissivities. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11, 17 (2013)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    Planck Collaboration. Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters. Astron. Astrophys. 594, A13 (2016)

  41. 41

    Shull, M. J., Smith, B. D. & Danforth, C. W. The baryon census in a multiphase intergalactic medium: 30% of the baryons may still be missing. Astrophys. J. 759, 23 (2012)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42

    Tumlinson, J ., Peeples, M. S. & Werk, J. K. The circumgalactic medium. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 55, 389–432 (2017)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We acknowledge the support and dedication of the staff of the National Radio Astronomy Observatory and particularly thank the VLA Director, M. McKinnon, as well as A. Mioduszewski and H. Medlin, for making the VLA campaign possible. We thank B. Griswold (NASA/GSFC) for beautiful graphic arts (Fig. 2). S.R.K. thanks M. Shull for discussions. The National Radio Astronomy Observatory is a facility of the National Science Foundation operated under cooperative agreement by Associated Universities, Inc. We thank the GMRT staff for scheduling our observations. The GMRT is run by the National Centre for Radio Astrophysics of the Tata Institute of Fundamental Research. The Australia Telescope Compact Array is part of the Australia Telescope National Facility, which is funded by the Australian Government for operation as a National Facility managed by CSIRO. K.P.M. is a Hintze Fellow and so is supported by the Hintze Centre for Astrophysical Surveys, which is funded through the Hintze Family Charitable Foundation. E.N. acknowledges the support of an ERC starting grant (GRB/SN) and an ISF grant (1277/13). G.H. acknowledges the support of NSF award AST-1654815. A.C. acknowledges support from the National Science Foundation CAREER award number 1455090 titled ‘CAREER: Radio and gravitational-wave emission from the largest explosions since the Big Bang’. A.H. acknowledges support by the I-Core Program of the Planning and Budgeting Committee and the Israel Science Foundation. T.M. acknowledges the support of the Australian Research Council through grant FT150100099. Parts of this research were conducted by the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for All-sky Astrophysics (CAASTRO), through project number CE110001020. D.L.K. was supported by NSF grant AST-1412421. M.M.K.’s work was supported by the GROWTH (Global Relay of Observatories Watching Transients Happen) project funded by the NSF under PIRE grant number 1545949. This work is part of the research programme Innovational Research Incentives Scheme (Vernieuwingsimpuls), which is financed by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research through NWO VIDI grant number 639.042.612-Nissanke and NWO TOP grant number 62002444-Nissanke. P.C. acknowledges support from the Department of Science and Technology via SwarnaJayanti Fellowship awards (DST/SJF/PSA-01/2014-15). T.P. acknowledges the support of the Advanced ERC grant TReX. V.B. acknowledges the support of the Science and Engineering Research Board, Department of Science and Technology, India, for the GROWTH-India project.

Author information




K.P.M., E.N., K.H., G.H. and D.A.F. wrote the paper. A.C. compiled the references. A.C. and A.H. compiled Methods. D.D. and K.D. compiled the radio measurements table. K.P.M. managed the VLA observing programme and processed all of the VLA data. S.T.M., A.D. and S.B. helped to plan the VLA observations. E.N., K.H., D.L.K. and K.P.M. prepared the figures. T.M. planned and managed ATCA observations and data analysis and contributed to the manuscript text. D.L.K. helped to propose and plan the ATCA observations and contributed to the manuscript text. E.L., D.D., C.L. and K.W.B. helped with ATCA observations and data reduction. K.D. planned and managed GMRT observations and contributed to the manuscript text. K.P.M. and P.C. processed the GMRT data. V.B. helped with the GMRT observations. O.G. and E.N. provided the cocoon simulation. K.H. provided the spherical ejecta model. S.N. did the gravitational-wave and cocoon-rates analysis. S.R.K., T.P., M.M.K. and L.P.S. provided text for the paper. All co-authors discussed the results and provided comments on the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. P. Mooley.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Additional information

Reviewer Information Nature thanks S. Chatterjee and R. Wijers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Figure 1 GW170817 radio image cut-outs.

Image cut-outs (30″?×?30″) from uGMRT (a, d), VLA (b, e) and ATCA (c, f) are shown, centred on NGC 4993. The position of GW170817 is marked by two black lines. ac, Images from August–September 2017, using the data reported in ref. 12. df, Data from October and December 2017. The flux density is indicated by the colour scale in each column. The synthesized beam is shown as an ellipse in the lower right corner of each image. Dec, declination; RA, right ascension.

Extended Data Figure 2 Confidence region for the radio spectral and temporal indices.

Joint confidence contours for α (the spectral power-law index) and δ (the temporal power-law index) are shown. The contours are 1σ, 2σ and 3σ confidence contours, and the location of the best-fit values, α?=?−0.61?±?0.05 and δ?=?0.78?±?0.05, is indicated by the red cross.

Extended Data Figure 3 Radio-only spectral indices of GW170817.

Radio spectral indices between 0.6 GHz and 15 GHz spanning multiple epochs (colour-coded) are shown. The corresponding days after the merger was detected and spectral indices are given in the legend. Error bars are 1σ. The joint analysis of all radio data (Methods) implies α?=?−0.61?±?0.05.

Extended Data Figure 4 Comparison between the radio and X-ray flux densities of GW170817.

The X-ray data are compared to the radio upper limits (arrows) and detections (filled symbols) at different epochs (colour-coded, see legend, and marked with different symbols). The difference epochs are 2017 August 19, August 26–28, September 2–3 and November 18 (2 days, around 10 days, around 15 days and 93 days after the merger was detected, respectively). Error bars are 1σ. The spectral index α?=?−0.60?±?0.03 and corresponding electron power-law index p?=?2.20?±?0.06 (assuming that the cooling frequency is beyond 1018?Hz, as expected for a mildly relativistic outflow) between 3 GHz and 1018?Hz, as derived from the September 2–3 data, are consistent with the radio-only spectral indices, and shown here as a dashed grey line. This indicates that the radio and X-ray emission originate from the same synchrotron source. The corresponding predicted soft-X-ray flux density on November 18 (0.3–2.2 nJy) is shown as an open magenta circle with an error bar. Note that the Chandra X-ray observations from December 3–6, reported after the submission of this paper, confirm this prediction. The flux densities in the ultraviolet (around 1015?Hz) and near-infrared (around 1014 Hz) bands, which are dominated by thermal emission at early times, are shown for reference.

Extended Data Table 1 Radio data for GW170817

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mooley, K., Nakar, E., Hotokezaka, K. et al. A mildly relativistic wide-angle outflow in the neutron-star merger event GW170817. Nature 554, 207–210 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature25452

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing